Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



The 2010 U.S. Census: Key Facts and Analysis

At a Glance

Title: The 2010 U.S. Census: Key Facts and Analysis

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Purpose and Legal Framework: 4 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Operational Execution and Methodology: 12 flashcards, 16 questions
  • Data Collection Evolution: 3 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Demographic Findings and Representation: 22 flashcards, 17 questions
  • Financial Aspects and Costs: 5 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Social and Political Context: 10 flashcards, 8 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 56
  • True/False Questions: 29
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 32
  • Total Questions: 61

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The 2010 U.S. Census: Key Facts and Analysis

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "2010 United States census" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The 2010 U.S. Census: Key Facts and Analysis

Study Guide: The 2010 U.S. Census: Key Facts and Analysis

Purpose and Legal Framework

The 2010 United States census was constitutionally mandated primarily to count residents for determining Congressional representation and for governmental planning.

Answer: True

The U.S. Constitution mandates the decennial census primarily to enumerate all residents within the nation. This count is fundamental for the constitutionally required reapportionment of Congressional seats among the states and serves as a critical basis for federal, state, and local governmental planning and resource allocation.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

Participation in the U.S. Census is legally mandated under Title 13 of the United States Code.

Answer: True

Title 13 of the United States Code establishes the legal requirement for individuals residing in the United States to participate in the decennial census, making response mandatory.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the legal requirement regarding participation in the U.S. Census?: Participation in the U.S. Census is mandated by law under Title 13 of the United States Code. This means that individuals residing in the United States are legally required to respond to census inquiries.

The primary purpose of the 2010 census was solely to update mailing lists for government agencies.

Answer: False

While census data aids government agencies, its primary constitutional purpose extends beyond merely updating mailing lists; it is fundamentally for determining Congressional representation and informing broad governmental planning.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.
  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.

Responding to the census is optional, and individuals cannot face legal penalties for refusal.

Answer: False

Participation in the U.S. Census is legally mandated under Title 13 of the U.S. Code, and while prosecutions are rare, penalties can be imposed for refusal to respond.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Census Bureau's stance on prosecuting individuals who refused to complete the 2010 census form?: While federal law includes penalties for refusing to complete the census form (a $100 fine in 2010), the Census Bureau stated it rarely prosecuted such failures. The Bureau's message emphasized the 'common good benefits of participation' rather than the penalty.
  • What is the legal requirement regarding participation in the U.S. Census?: Participation in the U.S. Census is mandated by law under Title 13 of the United States Code. This means that individuals residing in the United States are legally required to respond to census inquiries.

What was the primary constitutional purpose of the 2010 United States census?

Answer: To count every resident for Congressional representation and governmental planning.

The U.S. Constitution mandates the decennial census primarily to enumerate all residents within the nation. This count is fundamental for the constitutionally required reapportionment of Congressional seats among the states and serves as a critical basis for federal, state, and local governmental planning and resource allocation.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

What legal requirement mandates participation in the U.S. Census?

Answer: Title 13 of the United States Code

Title 13 of the United States Code establishes the legal requirement for individuals residing in the United States to participate in the decennial census, making response mandatory.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the legal requirement regarding participation in the U.S. Census?: Participation in the U.S. Census is mandated by law under Title 13 of the United States Code. This means that individuals residing in the United States are legally required to respond to census inquiries.
  • What was the Census Bureau's stance on prosecuting individuals who refused to complete the 2010 census form?: While federal law includes penalties for refusing to complete the census form (a $100 fine in 2010), the Census Bureau stated it rarely prosecuted such failures. The Bureau's message emphasized the 'common good benefits of participation' rather than the penalty.

What was the Census Bureau's general approach to prosecuting individuals who refused to complete the 2010 census form?

Answer: They rarely prosecuted failures, emphasizing participation benefits instead.

While federal law permits penalties for census non-response, the Census Bureau's approach focused on promoting the benefits of participation rather than actively prosecuting refusals, which were rarely pursued.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Census Bureau's stance on prosecuting individuals who refused to complete the 2010 census form?: While federal law includes penalties for refusing to complete the census form (a $100 fine in 2010), the Census Bureau stated it rarely prosecuted such failures. The Bureau's message emphasized the 'common good benefits of participation' rather than the penalty.
  • What was the penalty for reporting false information on the 2010 census, compared to not responding?: The penalty for reporting false information on the 2010 census was $500, which was significantly higher than the $100 fine for failing to respond to the census.

What penalty was associated with reporting false information on the 2010 census form?

Answer: A $500 fine

Reporting false information on the 2010 census form carried a penalty of $500, which was distinct from the $100 fine associated with failing to respond.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the penalty for reporting false information on the 2010 census, compared to not responding?: The penalty for reporting false information on the 2010 census was $500, which was significantly higher than the $100 fine for failing to respond to the census.
  • What was the Census Bureau's stance on prosecuting individuals who refused to complete the 2010 census form?: While federal law includes penalties for refusing to complete the census form (a $100 fine in 2010), the Census Bureau stated it rarely prosecuted such failures. The Bureau's message emphasized the 'common good benefits of participation' rather than the penalty.

Operational Execution and Methodology

National Census Day, April 1, 2010, was established to determine the residency status of individuals for the count.

Answer: True

National Census Day, designated as April 1, 2010, served as the official reference date for the 2010 U.S. Census. The residency status of individuals was determined based on their location on this specific day to ensure an accurate enumeration.

Related Concepts:

  • What date was designated as National Census Day for the 2010 U.S. Census?: National Census Day, serving as the official reference date for the 2010 U.S. Census, was designated as April 1, 2010. This date was crucial for establishing the residency status of individuals for enumeration purposes.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.

The 2010 census primarily relied on mail-in self-reporting, supplemented by enumerators for non-respondents and spot checks.

Answer: True

The primary method for data collection in the 2010 census involved households self-reporting via mail-in forms. Enumerators were subsequently deployed to conduct follow-up interviews with non-responding households and to perform spot checks in selected areas to ensure comprehensive coverage.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.
  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.

The 2010 census enumeration was inaugurated by Census Bureau Director Robert Groves in Noorvik, Alaska.

Answer: True

The official enumeration process for the 2010 U.S. Census commenced with Census Bureau Director Robert Groves conducting the first count in Noorvik, Alaska.

Related Concepts:

  • Who inaugurated the 2010 census enumeration, and where did it begin?: The official enumeration process for the 2010 U.S. Census commenced with Census Bureau Director Robert Groves conducting the first count in Noorvik, Alaska.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

The national mail participation rate for the 2010 U.S. census was 74%.

Answer: True

The 2010 U.S. Census achieved a national mail participation rate of 74%, indicating the proportion of households that returned their census forms via mail.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the national mail participation rate for the 2010 census?: The national mail participation rate for the 2010 U.S. census was 74%.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.

Lockheed Martin's contract for data capture and standardization for the 2010 census ultimately exceeded one billion dollars.

Answer: True

The contract awarded to Lockheed Martin for the crucial tasks of data capture and standardization for the 2010 census ultimately surpassed an initial value of one billion dollars.

Related Concepts:

  • Which company was contracted for data capture and standardization for the 2010 census, and what was the contract's value?: Lockheed Martin won a contract valued at $500 million in 2005 for data capture and standardization for the 2010 census. The final value of this contract exceeded one billion dollars.

High-speed document scanning technology and GPS-enabled handheld devices were key technologies used to improve the 2010 census's accuracy and efficiency.

Answer: True

The 2010 census leveraged advanced technologies, including high-speed document scanners for data processing and GPS-equipped handheld devices for address canvassing, to enhance both accuracy and operational efficiency.

Related Concepts:

  • What technology was used for the address canvassing operation in the 2010 census?: Hand-held computing devices equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) capability were utilized for the address canvassing operation during the 2010 census.
  • How was technology used to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the 2010 census?: High-speed document scanning technology, such as ImageTrac scanners, was employed to capture and standardize data efficiently. Additionally, research on cell-phone usage informed media and advertising strategies to target non-respondent populations, and handheld computing devices with GPS were used for the address canvassing operation.

The 2010 census was primarily conducted using paper forms mailed directly to households, with no online option available.

Answer: True

The primary mode of response for the 2010 U.S. Census involved mail-in paper forms, as an online response option was not provided during that census cycle.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.
  • Was an internet response option available for the 2010 census?: No, unlike some later censuses, an internet response option was not offered for the 2010 census, nor was the form available for download. Participation was primarily through mail-in forms or by enumerators.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

The Non-Response Follow-up (NRFU) operation was completed entirely by mail before National Census Day.

Answer: False

The Non-Response Follow-up (NRFU) operation involved enumerators visiting households that did not return their forms, and it occurred after National Census Day, not before, and was conducted in person, not solely by mail.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'non-response follow-up' (NRFU) operation in the 2010 census?: The non-response follow-up (NRFU) was an operation conducted from April through July 2010 where census takers visited households that had not returned their census forms by mail. This was a crucial step to ensure as complete a count as possible.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.

What date served as the official reference point, or National Census Day, for the 2010 United States census?

Answer: April 1, 2010

National Census Day, designated as April 1, 2010, served as the official reference date for the 2010 U.S. Census. The residency status of individuals was determined based on their location on this specific day to ensure an accurate enumeration.

Related Concepts:

  • What date was designated as National Census Day for the 2010 U.S. Census?: National Census Day, serving as the official reference date for the 2010 U.S. Census, was designated as April 1, 2010. This date was crucial for establishing the residency status of individuals for enumeration purposes.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

How was the 2010 census primarily conducted?

Answer: Primarily via mail-in self-reporting by households.

The primary method for data collection in the 2010 census involved households self-reporting via mail-in forms. Enumerators were subsequently deployed to conduct follow-up interviews with non-responding households and to perform spot checks in selected areas to ensure comprehensive coverage.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

Who inaugurated the 2010 census enumeration, and where did it begin?

Answer: Census Bureau Director Robert Groves in Noorvik, Alaska.

The official enumeration process for the 2010 U.S. Census commenced with Census Bureau Director Robert Groves conducting the first count in Noorvik, Alaska.

Related Concepts:

  • Who inaugurated the 2010 census enumeration, and where did it begin?: The official enumeration process for the 2010 U.S. Census commenced with Census Bureau Director Robert Groves conducting the first count in Noorvik, Alaska.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.
  • What date was designated as National Census Day for the 2010 U.S. Census?: National Census Day, serving as the official reference date for the 2010 U.S. Census, was designated as April 1, 2010. This date was crucial for establishing the residency status of individuals for enumeration purposes.

What was the national mail participation rate for the 2010 U.S. census?

Answer: 74%

The 2010 U.S. Census achieved a national mail participation rate of 74%, indicating the proportion of households that returned their census forms via mail.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the national mail participation rate for the 2010 census?: The national mail participation rate for the 2010 U.S. census was 74%.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.
  • How were census forms distributed for the 2010 census?: Census forms were distributed by the U.S. Post Office starting on March 15, 2010, with over 120 million forms delivered. By April 1, 2010, approximately 134 million forms had been mailed out or hand-delivered by the Census Bureau.

What was the purpose of the Non-Response Follow-up (NRFU) operation during the 2010 census?

Answer: To follow up with households that did not return their census forms by mail.

The Non-Response Follow-up (NRFU) was an operation conducted where census takers visited households that had not returned their census forms by mail. This was a crucial step to ensure as complete a count as possible.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'non-response follow-up' (NRFU) operation in the 2010 census?: The non-response follow-up (NRFU) was an operation conducted from April through July 2010 where census takers visited households that had not returned their census forms by mail. This was a crucial step to ensure as complete a count as possible.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

Was an internet response option available for the 2010 U.S. Census?

Answer: No, it was not offered for the 2010 census.

An internet response option was not available for the 2010 U.S. Census; participation was primarily conducted through mail-in forms or enumerator follow-up.

Related Concepts:

  • Was an internet response option available for the 2010 census?: No, unlike some later censuses, an internet response option was not offered for the 2010 census, nor was the form available for download. Participation was primarily through mail-in forms or by enumerators.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

What company was awarded a significant contract for data capture and standardization for the 2010 census?

Answer: Lockheed Martin

The contract awarded to Lockheed Martin for the crucial tasks of data capture and standardization for the 2010 census ultimately surpassed an initial value of one billion dollars.

Related Concepts:

  • Which company was contracted for data capture and standardization for the 2010 census, and what was the contract's value?: Lockheed Martin won a contract valued at $500 million in 2005 for data capture and standardization for the 2010 census. The final value of this contract exceeded one billion dollars.

Which technology was utilized for the address canvassing operation during the 2010 census?

Answer: Hand-held computing devices with GPS

The 2010 census leveraged advanced technologies, including GPS-equipped handheld devices for address canvassing, to enhance both accuracy and operational efficiency.

Related Concepts:

  • What technology was used for the address canvassing operation in the 2010 census?: Hand-held computing devices equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) capability were utilized for the address canvassing operation during the 2010 census.
  • How was technology used to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the 2010 census?: High-speed document scanning technology, such as ImageTrac scanners, was employed to capture and standardize data efficiently. Additionally, research on cell-phone usage informed media and advertising strategies to target non-respondent populations, and handheld computing devices with GPS were used for the address canvassing operation.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.

Data Collection Evolution

The elimination of the census 'long form' and the transition of detailed data collection to the American Community Survey (ACS) were significant methodological changes for the 2010 census.

Answer: True

A significant methodological alteration for the 2010 census was the discontinuation of the 'long form' questionnaire, which had previously collected detailed socioeconomic data. This data collection responsibility was subsequently transferred to the American Community Survey (ACS).

Related Concepts:

  • What was a major change in the methodology of the 2010 census compared to previous censuses?: A significant change in the 2010 census was the elimination of the 'long form'. Unlike previous censuses where a portion of households received a long form for detailed socio-economic data, the 2010 census exclusively used a short form with ten basic questions.
  • How was detailed socioeconomic information collected in 2010, replacing the census long form?: Detailed socioeconomic information, previously collected via the census long form, was transitioned to the American Community Survey (ACS). The ACS collects data on a rolling basis (1-year or 3-year cycles) from a small percentage of the population annually, providing more current community data.
  • What kind of information was collected on the short form of the 2010 census?: The 2010 census short form asked ten basic questions covering household occupancy status, number of residents, telephone number, and personal details for up to twelve residents, including name, sex, age, date of birth, Hispanic/Latino origin, race, and whether the person lived elsewhere. This focused approach aimed to streamline data collection.

What significant change was made to the census methodology in 2010, eliminating the need for a separate 'long form'?

Answer: Elimination of the long form; detailed data moved to ACS.

A significant methodological alteration for the 2010 census was the discontinuation of the 'long form' questionnaire. This data collection responsibility was subsequently transferred to the American Community Survey (ACS).

Related Concepts:

  • What was a major change in the methodology of the 2010 census compared to previous censuses?: A significant change in the 2010 census was the elimination of the 'long form'. Unlike previous censuses where a portion of households received a long form for detailed socio-economic data, the 2010 census exclusively used a short form with ten basic questions.
  • What kind of information was collected on the short form of the 2010 census?: The 2010 census short form asked ten basic questions covering household occupancy status, number of residents, telephone number, and personal details for up to twelve residents, including name, sex, age, date of birth, Hispanic/Latino origin, race, and whether the person lived elsewhere. This focused approach aimed to streamline data collection.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

How was detailed socioeconomic information collected in 2010, replacing the census long form?

Answer: It was gathered through the American Community Survey (ACS).

Detailed socioeconomic information, previously collected via the census long form, was transitioned to the American Community Survey (ACS). The ACS collects data on a rolling basis from a small percentage of the population annually.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a major change in the methodology of the 2010 census compared to previous censuses?: A significant change in the 2010 census was the elimination of the 'long form'. Unlike previous censuses where a portion of households received a long form for detailed socio-economic data, the 2010 census exclusively used a short form with ten basic questions.
  • How was detailed socioeconomic information collected in 2010, replacing the census long form?: Detailed socioeconomic information, previously collected via the census long form, was transitioned to the American Community Survey (ACS). The ACS collects data on a rolling basis (1-year or 3-year cycles) from a small percentage of the population annually, providing more current community data.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.

The 2010 census saw the elimination of the 'long form'. What was the primary consequence of this change?

Answer: The collection of detailed socioeconomic data shifted to the American Community Survey (ACS).

The primary consequence of eliminating the census 'long form' in 2010 was the transfer of detailed socioeconomic data collection to the American Community Survey (ACS), which operates on an ongoing annual basis.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a major change in the methodology of the 2010 census compared to previous censuses?: A significant change in the 2010 census was the elimination of the 'long form'. Unlike previous censuses where a portion of households received a long form for detailed socio-economic data, the 2010 census exclusively used a short form with ten basic questions.
  • What kind of information was collected on the short form of the 2010 census?: The 2010 census short form asked ten basic questions covering household occupancy status, number of residents, telephone number, and personal details for up to twelve residents, including name, sex, age, date of birth, Hispanic/Latino origin, race, and whether the person lived elsewhere. This focused approach aimed to streamline data collection.

Demographic Findings and Representation

The total population count for the United States in the 2010 census was 308,745,538.

Answer: True

The official total population count for the United States, as determined by the 2010 census conducted on April 1, 2010, was 308,745,538 individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total population count for the United States in the 2010 census?: The total population of the United States as counted in the 2010 census was 308,745,538 people.
  • What was the total population of the United States as of April 1, 2010?: As of April 1, 2010, the total population of the United States was 308,745,538.
  • What was the percentage increase in the U.S. population from the 2000 census to the 2010 census?: The U.S. population increased by 9.7% between the 2000 census and the 2010 census.

Texas experienced a larger population increase in absolute numbers than California between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Answer: True

For the first time since 1930, Texas surpassed California in population growth in absolute numbers between the 2000 and 2010 censuses. Texas added 4.3 million residents, while California added 3.4 million.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state had the largest population increase in absolute numbers in the 2010 census?: Texas recorded the largest population increase in absolute numbers, adding 4,293,741 people between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.
  • How did California's population growth compare to Texas's in the 2010 census?: For the first time since 1930, Texas surpassed California in population growth in absolute numbers between the 2000 and 2010 censuses. Texas added 4.3 million residents, while California added 3.4 million.

Texas gained four seats in the U.S. House of Representatives based on the 2010 census results.

Answer: True

The reapportionment following the 2010 census resulted in Texas being allocated four additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the 2010 census results affect the representation of states in the U.S. House of Representatives?: The results of the 2010 census determined the number of seats each state would hold in the U.S. House of Representatives starting with the 2012 elections. This reapportionment process led to changes in congressional representation for 18 states, with eight gaining seats and ten losing seats.

Nevada had the highest percentage rate of population growth between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Answer: True

Nevada recorded the highest percentage increase in population between the 2000 and 2010 decennial censuses.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state had the highest percentage rate of population growth according to the 2010 census?: Nevada experienced the highest percentage rate of population growth, increasing by 35.1% between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Michigan was the only state that experienced a population decrease between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Answer: True

Michigan was the sole state to register a decline in population between the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Censuses.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state was the only one to lose population according to the 2010 census?: Michigan was the only state that experienced a population decrease, losing 54,804 residents between the 2000 and 2010 censuses. Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory, also saw a population decline.

New York City was ranked as the most populous city in the United States in the 2010 census.

Answer: True

According to the 2010 census data, New York City maintained its position as the most populous city within the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • Which city was ranked as the most populous in the United States based on the 2010 census?: New York City remained the most populous city in the United States, with a population of 8,175,133 recorded in the 2010 census.
  • What was the population density of New York City according to the 2010 census?: New York City had a population density of 27,016.3 people per square mile, based on its population of 8,175,133 and a land area of 302.6 square miles recorded in the 2010 census.

For the first time, all 100 most populous cities recorded populations greater than 500,000 in the 2010 census.

Answer: False

The 2010 census marked the first time that all 100 most populous cities recorded populations exceeding 200,000, not 500,000. Additionally, it was the first census where every state had a population over 500,000.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant demographic milestones were achieved for the first time in the 2010 census?: The 2010 census marked two significant firsts: it was the first census where every state recorded a population exceeding 500,000 people, and it was also the first time that all of the 100 most populous cities recorded populations greater than 200,000.

The U.S. Census Bureau delivered complete redistricting data to the states in December 2010.

Answer: False

While population counts for apportionment were delivered in December 2010, the complete redistricting data was provided to the states in March 2011, not December 2010.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the results of the 2010 census used for apportionment and redistricting?: The U.S. Census Bureau delivered population information for apportionment to the U.S. President in December 2010. Subsequently, complete redistricting data was provided to the states in March 2011.
  • How did the 2010 census results affect the representation of states in the U.S. House of Representatives?: The results of the 2010 census determined the number of seats each state would hold in the U.S. House of Representatives starting with the 2012 elections. This reapportionment process led to changes in congressional representation for 18 states, with eight gaining seats and ten losing seats.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

What was the total population count for the United States in the 2010 census?

Answer: 308,745,538

The official total population count for the United States, as determined by the 2010 census conducted on April 1, 2010, was 308,745,538 individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total population count for the United States in the 2010 census?: The total population of the United States as counted in the 2010 census was 308,745,538 people.
  • What was the total population of the United States as of April 1, 2010?: As of April 1, 2010, the total population of the United States was 308,745,538.
  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.

Which state surpassed California in population growth in absolute numbers for the first time since 1930, according to the 2010 census?

Answer: Texas

For the first time since 1930, Texas surpassed California in population growth in absolute numbers between the 2000 and 2010 censuses. Texas added 4.3 million residents, while California added 3.4 million.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state had the largest population increase in absolute numbers in the 2010 census?: Texas recorded the largest population increase in absolute numbers, adding 4,293,741 people between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.
  • Which state had the highest population in the 2010 census?: California was the most populous state in the 2010 census, with a population of 37,253,956.
  • Which state had the highest percentage rate of population growth according to the 2010 census?: Nevada experienced the highest percentage rate of population growth, increasing by 35.1% between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

When did the U.S. Census Bureau deliver population information for apportionment to the President?

Answer: December 2010

The U.S. Census Bureau delivered population information for apportionment to the U.S. President in December 2010. Subsequently, complete redistricting data was provided to the states in March 2011.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the results of the 2010 census used for apportionment and redistricting?: The U.S. Census Bureau delivered population information for apportionment to the U.S. President in December 2010. Subsequently, complete redistricting data was provided to the states in March 2011.

Which of the following states gained congressional seats as a result of the 2010 census reapportionment?

Answer: Texas and Florida

Based on the 2010 census reapportionment, Texas gained four seats and Florida gained two seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the 2010 census results affect the representation of states in the U.S. House of Representatives?: The results of the 2010 census determined the number of seats each state would hold in the U.S. House of Representatives starting with the 2012 elections. This reapportionment process led to changes in congressional representation for 18 states, with eight gaining seats and ten losing seats.
  • How did the 2010 census reapportionment affect the number of congressional seats for New York and Ohio?: Based on the 2010 census reapportionment, both New York and Ohio lost two congressional seats each due to population shifts relative to other states.

Which state had the highest percentage rate of population growth between the 2000 and 2010 censuses?

Answer: Nevada

Nevada recorded the highest percentage increase in population between the 2000 and 2010 decennial censuses, growing by 35.1%.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state had the largest population increase in absolute numbers in the 2010 census?: Texas recorded the largest population increase in absolute numbers, adding 4,293,741 people between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.
  • Which state had the highest percentage rate of population growth according to the 2010 census?: Nevada experienced the highest percentage rate of population growth, increasing by 35.1% between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.
  • Which state had the highest population in the 2010 census?: California was the most populous state in the 2010 census, with a population of 37,253,956.

According to the 2010 census, which state was the only one to experience a population decrease?

Answer: Michigan

Michigan was the sole state to register a decline in population between the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Censuses, losing 54,804 residents.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state was the only one to lose population according to the 2010 census?: Michigan was the only state that experienced a population decrease, losing 54,804 residents between the 2000 and 2010 censuses. Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory, also saw a population decline.

What was the population of New York City as recorded in the 2010 census?

Answer: 8,175,133

New York City maintained its position as the most populous city in the United States, with a recorded population of 8,175,133 in the 2010 census.

Related Concepts:

  • Which city was ranked as the most populous in the United States based on the 2010 census?: New York City remained the most populous city in the United States, with a population of 8,175,133 recorded in the 2010 census.
  • What was the population density of New York City according to the 2010 census?: New York City had a population density of 27,016.3 people per square mile, based on its population of 8,175,133 and a land area of 302.6 square miles recorded in the 2010 census.

Which major metropolitan statistical area (MSA) was the most populous in the United States according to the 2010 census?

Answer: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA

The New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) was the most populous in the United States, with a total of 19,567,410 residents counted in the 2010 census.

Related Concepts:

  • Which city was ranked as the most populous in the United States based on the 2010 census?: New York City remained the most populous city in the United States, with a population of 8,175,133 recorded in the 2010 census.
  • Which metropolitan statistical area (MSA) ranked second in population according to the 2010 census?: The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area ranked second in population with 12,828,837 residents in the 2010 census.
  • What significant demographic milestones were achieved for the first time in the 2010 census?: The 2010 census marked two significant firsts: it was the first census where every state recorded a population exceeding 500,000 people, and it was also the first time that all of the 100 most populous cities recorded populations greater than 200,000.

Which city ranked second in population in the United States based on the 2010 census?

Answer: Los Angeles

Los Angeles ranked second in population among U.S. cities in the 2010 census, with a recorded population of 3,792,621.

Related Concepts:

  • Which city ranked second in population in the 2010 census, and what was its population?: Los Angeles ranked second in population, with 3,792,621 residents counted in the 2010 census. It is located in California.
  • Which metropolitan statistical area (MSA) ranked second in population according to the 2010 census?: The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area ranked second in population with 12,828,837 residents in the 2010 census.
  • Which city was ranked as the most populous in the United States based on the 2010 census?: New York City remained the most populous city in the United States, with a population of 8,175,133 recorded in the 2010 census.

Financial Aspects and Costs

The total cost of the 2010 census was approximately $13 billion, amounting to about $42 per capita.

Answer: True

The 2010 U.S. Census incurred a total expenditure of approximately $13 billion, resulting in a per capita cost of roughly $42.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total cost of the 2010 census, and how did it compare internationally?: The 2010 census cost $13 billion, which amounted to approximately $42 per capita. This cost was significantly higher than the per capita costs for censuses in China (about US$1) and India (US$0.40).
  • What did the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding the cost of censuses?: In December 2010, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970. The GAO had previously estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion in a 2004 report.
  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.

The operational costs for the 2010 census were significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget, totaling $5.4 billion.

Answer: True

The operational expenses for the 2010 census were substantially below the allocated budget of $7 billion, concluding at $5.4 billion.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.
  • What did the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding the cost of censuses?: In December 2010, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970. The GAO had previously estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion in a 2004 report.
  • What was the total cost of the 2010 census, and how did it compare internationally?: The 2010 census cost $13 billion, which amounted to approximately $42 per capita. This cost was significantly higher than the per capita costs for censuses in China (about US$1) and India (US$0.40).

Higher-than-expected mail-in response rates and lower-than-planned costs in certain areas contributed to the 2010 census operational costs being under budget.

Answer: True

Factors such as elevated mail-in response rates and reduced costs in specific operational areas contributed to the 2010 census's final operational expenditures falling below the projected budget.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.
  • Describe the primary methodology employed for the 2010 U.S. Census and the role of enumerators within this process.: The 2010 U.S. Census was predominantly executed via mail-in self-reporting by households. A contingent of 635,000 temporary enumerators was employed to conduct spot checks in randomized areas and to perform non-response follow-up (NRFU) for households that did not return their forms.
  • What did the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding the cost of censuses?: In December 2010, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970. The GAO had previously estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion in a 2004 report.

The 2010 census cost per capita was significantly lower than that of the censuses conducted in China and India during the same period.

Answer: False

The 2010 U.S. census per capita cost of approximately $42 was significantly higher than the per capita costs for censuses in China (around US$1) and India (US$0.40).

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total cost of the 2010 census, and how did it compare internationally?: The 2010 census cost $13 billion, which amounted to approximately $42 per capita. This cost was significantly higher than the per capita costs for censuses in China (about US$1) and India (US$0.40).
  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.
  • What did the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding the cost of censuses?: In December 2010, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970. The GAO had previously estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion in a 2004 report.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that census costs had roughly stayed the same each decade since 1970.

Answer: False

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970, indicating a significant increase, not stability.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding the cost of censuses?: In December 2010, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970. The GAO had previously estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion in a 2004 report.
  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.

What was the total cost of the 2010 census?

Answer: $13 billion

The 2010 U.S. Census incurred a total expenditure of approximately $13 billion.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.
  • What was the total cost of the 2010 census, and how did it compare internationally?: The 2010 census cost $13 billion, which amounted to approximately $42 per capita. This cost was significantly higher than the per capita costs for censuses in China (about US$1) and India (US$0.40).
  • What did the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding the cost of censuses?: In December 2010, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970. The GAO had previously estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion in a 2004 report.

Which of the following factors contributed to the 2010 census operational costs being under budget?

Answer: Higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.

Factors such as elevated mail-in response rates and reduced costs in specific operational areas contributed to the 2010 census's final operational expenditures falling below the projected budget.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the operational costs of the 2010 census compare to its budget?: The operational costs for the 2010 census were $5.4 billion, which was significantly under the allocated $7 billion budget. This underspending was attributed to several factors, including higher-than-expected mail-in response rates.

What was the approximate cost per capita for the 2010 U.S. census?

Answer: $42.00

The total cost per capita for the 2010 U.S. Census was approximately $42.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total cost per capita for the 2010 U.S. census?: The total cost per capita for the 2010 U.S. census was approximately $42.
  • What did the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding the cost of censuses?: In December 2010, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the cost of conducting the U.S. census had approximately doubled each decade since 1970. The GAO had previously estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion in a 2004 report.
  • What was the total cost of the 2010 census, and how did it compare internationally?: The 2010 census cost $13 billion, which amounted to approximately $42 per capita. This cost was significantly higher than the per capita costs for censuses in China (about US$1) and India (US$0.40).

Social and Political Context

The Census Bureau announced in 2009 that same-sex married couples would be counted, although the form lacked a specific category for them.

Answer: True

Prior to the 2010 census, the Census Bureau confirmed that same-sex married couples would be included in the count, despite the absence of a dedicated category on the form, allowing them to be listed as 'Husband or wife'.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the 2010 census address the counting of same-sex married couples?: The Census Bureau announced in June 2009 that it would count same-sex married couples. While the final form did not have a specific 'same-sex married couple' option, married same-sex partners could be listed as 'Husband or wife', similar to opposite-sex married couples. An 'unmarried partner' option was also available.

Celebrities such as Demi Lovato and Eva Longoria were featured in marketing campaigns to encourage participation in the 2010 census.

Answer: True

Public service announcements and marketing campaigns for the 2010 census featured various celebrities, including Demi Lovato and Eva Longoria, to promote participation among diverse demographic groups.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the principal constitutional objective of the 2010 United States census?: The 2010 United States census, the 23rd decennial enumeration, was constitutionally mandated to count every resident. This fundamental objective serves to determine Congressional representation and inform critical governmental planning and resource allocation.
  • What role did celebrities play in the marketing of the 2010 census?: Various American celebrities were utilized in public service announcements (PSAs) to encourage participation, particularly among younger demographics and specific ethnic groups. Notable participants included Demi Lovato, Eva Longoria, Wilmer Valderrama, Rosario Dawson, and Ludacris, who helped spread awareness.

The inclusion of 'Negro' as a race option was primarily intended to capture data from younger African American respondents.

Answer: False

The Census Bureau stated that the inclusion of 'Negro' as a race option was intended to accommodate older African American respondents who identified with the term, not younger ones.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Census Bureau's rationale for including 'Negro' as a race option in the 2010 census?: The Census Bureau explained that 'Negro' was included as a race option because many older African Americans identified with and still used the term, and the Bureau aimed to include all individuals who identified themselves that way.
  • What controversy arose regarding the inclusion of the term 'Negro' in the 2010 census questionnaire?: The term 'Negro' was included as an option for African Americans in Question 9 of the 2010 census race categories. While the Census Bureau stated it was to accommodate older respondents who identify with the term, it drew complaints, and the Bureau subsequently decided to remove it from future forms starting with the 2014 American Community Survey.

How did the 2010 census handle the counting of same-sex married couples?

Answer: They could be listed as 'Husband or wife', similar to opposite-sex couples.

The Census Bureau confirmed that same-sex married couples would be included in the 2010 count. While the form lacked a specific category, they could be listed as 'Husband or wife,' mirroring the option for opposite-sex couples.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the 2010 census address the counting of same-sex married couples?: The Census Bureau announced in June 2009 that it would count same-sex married couples. While the final form did not have a specific 'same-sex married couple' option, married same-sex partners could be listed as 'Husband or wife', similar to opposite-sex married couples. An 'unmarried partner' option was also available.

Why did the Census Bureau target advertising towards conservative populations for the 2010 census?

Answer: To address concerns about potential undercounts among this demographic.

The Census Bureau targeted advertising towards conservative populations due to concerns about potential undercounts among this demographic, aiming to encourage their participation and ensure a more accurate enumeration.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose of the Census Bureau's advertising campaign targeting political conservatives?: The advertising campaign targeting political conservatives aimed to encourage their participation in the census and prevent an undercount of this demographic, as participation rates had been declining and some conservatives had expressed privacy concerns.
  • Why did the Census Bureau target advertising towards conservative populations for the 2010 census?: The Census Bureau targeted advertising towards conservative populations, including sponsoring NASCAR events and using Marie Osmond in promotions, due to concerns about potential undercounts among this demographic. Marketing surveys indicated that NASCAR fans, in particular, leaned politically conservative, and participation rates had been declining since 1970.

What controversy arose regarding the inclusion of the term 'Negro' in the 2010 census race categories?

Answer: It was included for older respondents but later removed due to complaints.

The inclusion of 'Negro' as a race option in the 2010 census, intended for older respondents, generated controversy and complaints, leading to its subsequent removal from future census forms.

Related Concepts:

  • What controversy arose regarding the inclusion of the term 'Negro' in the 2010 census questionnaire?: The term 'Negro' was included as an option for African Americans in Question 9 of the 2010 census race categories. While the Census Bureau stated it was to accommodate older respondents who identify with the term, it drew complaints, and the Bureau subsequently decided to remove it from future forms starting with the 2014 American Community Survey.
  • What was the Census Bureau's rationale for including 'Negro' as a race option in the 2010 census?: The Census Bureau explained that 'Negro' was included as a race option because many older African Americans identified with and still used the term, and the Bureau aimed to include all individuals who identified themselves that way.

Which of the following cities challenged its 2010 census results, citing issues like census tracts losing population but few housing units?

Answer: Detroit

Detroit, Michigan, was among the cities that challenged their 2010 census results, citing discrepancies such as census tracts showing population loss despite minimal changes in housing units, suggesting potential enumeration errors.

Related Concepts:

  • Which major cities challenged their 2010 census results, and why?: Detroit, Michigan; New York City, New York; and the District of Columbia challenged their census results. Detroit cited inconsistencies like a census tract losing many people but few housing units, suggesting a missed jail or dormitory. New York cited implausibly low growth rates in Queens and Brooklyn and high vacancy numbers. The District of Columbia pointed to 'nonsensical' data, such as housing units in non-existent streets.

The Census Bureau enlisted intermediaries like churches and charities for the 2010 census primarily to:

Answer: Ensure a more accurate count by emphasizing participation among specific populations.

The Census Bureau engaged intermediaries such as churches and charities to emphasize the importance of census participation and to help ensure a more accurate count, particularly among populations historically subject to undercounts.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Census Bureau address allegations of undercounts for specific populations in the 2010 census?: To address allegations of undercounts among poor people and non-whites in previous censuses, the Census Bureau enlisted tens of thousands of intermediaries, such as churches and charities, to emphasize the importance of participation and ensure a more accurate count.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy