Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 7
According to ancient Indian literature like the Mahabharata, the Abhiras lived near the seashore and the Sarasvati River in Gujarat.
Answer: True
Ancient texts such as the Mahabharata place the Abhiras in proximity to the seashore and the Sarasvati River in the Gujarat region.
The core territory of the Abhira dynasty was centered around modern-day Indore in Madhya Pradesh.
Answer: False
The core territory of the Abhira dynasty was primarily centered around Nasik and adjoining areas in western Maharashtra.
The Abhira dynasty's rule is mapped in South Asia, alongside entities like the Sasanian Hind and the Gupta Empire.
Answer: True
Cartographic representations place the Abhira dynasty within South Asia, contemporary with polities such as the Sasanian Hind and the Gupta Empire.
Patanjali's Mahabhashya differentiates the Abhiras from the Shudras.
Answer: True
Patanjali's Mahabhashya mentions the Abhiras as a distinct tribe, thereby differentiating them from the Shudras.
According to ancient texts like the Mahabharata, where were the Abhiras located?
Answer: Near the seashore and the Sarasvati River in Gujarat
Ancient Indian literature, including the Mahabharata, indicates that the Abhiras resided near the seashore and the Sarasvati River in Gujarat.
Which of the following was NOT part of the Abhira kingdom's extensive territory?
Answer: The coastal region of Kerala
The Abhira kingdom's territory encompassed regions like Maharashtra, Gujarat, and parts of southern Madhya Pradesh, but not the coastal region of Kerala.
Who proposed the theory that the Abhiras migrated by sea from Sindh and conquered the western coast?
Answer: Bhagwan Lal Indraji
Scholar Bhagwan Lal Indraji theorized that the Abhiras migrated via sea from Sindh and subsequently conquered the western coast of India.
The Abhira dynasty primarily ruled over the western Deccan region of India.
Answer: True
The source identifies the Abhira dynasty's primary rule as being in the western Deccan region.
Ishwarsena is recognized as the first independent king of the Abhira dynasty.
Answer: True
Historical records identify Ishwarsena as the inaugural independent monarch of the Abhira dynasty.
Most Puranic texts suggest the Abhira dynasty ruled for approximately one hundred and sixty-seven years.
Answer: False
Most Puranic texts estimate the duration of the Abhira rule at sixty-seven years, although the Vayu Purana suggests a longer period of one hundred and sixty-seven years.
The Abhira dynasty's rule began around 203 AD and ended around 370 AD.
Answer: True
The provided timeline indicates the Abhira dynasty's rule commenced circa 203 AD and concluded approximately by 370 AD.
The Abhira dynasty employed a democratic form of government.
Answer: False
The Abhira dynasty operated under a monarchy, not a democratic form of government.
The Abhira dynasty is associated with the medieval period of Indian history.
Answer: False
The Abhira dynasty is associated with the Early Classical period of Indian history, not the medieval period.
Which region was the primary domain of the Abhira dynasty?
Answer: The Western Deccan, centered around Nasik
The primary domain of the Abhira dynasty was the western Deccan, with its core territory centered around Nasik.
What is the approximate duration of the Abhira rule according to *most* Puranic texts?
Answer: About 67 years
The majority of Puranic texts estimate the duration of the Abhira dynasty's rule to be approximately sixty-seven years.
What was the approximate end date for the rule of the Abhira dynasty?
Answer: 315 AD or 370 AD
The rule of the Abhira dynasty is generally considered to have concluded around 315 AD or 370 AD.
Abhira Rudrabhuti served as the *senapati* (commander-in-chief) for the Saka satrap Rudrasimha.
Answer: True
According to the Gunda inscription, Abhira Rudrabhuti held the position of *senapati* under the Saka satrap Rudrasimha, not under the Gupta Emperor Samudragupta.
The Allahabad Pillar inscription of Samudragupta lists the Abhira kingdom as a major independent kingdom within the Gupta Empire.
Answer: False
The Allahabad Pillar inscription categorizes the Abhira kingdom as a frontier kingdom paying tribute, indicating subordination rather than independence within the Gupta Empire.
V.V. Mirashi identified the Traikutakas as feudatories or subordinate rulers under the Abhiras.
Answer: True
Scholar V.V. Mirashi posited that the Traikutaka dynasty served as feudatories or subordinate rulers under the Abhira dynasty.
The Abhiras were instrumental in the rise of the Satavahana dynasty in the third century AD.
Answer: False
The Abhiras played a key role in the downfall, not the rise, of the Satavahana dynasty in the third century AD.
The Traikutaka rule in Aparanta began around the same time Ishwarsena started his rule, suggesting a potential connection.
Answer: True
The temporal overlap between the commencement of Traikuta rule in Aparanta and Ishwarsena's reign supports the hypothesis of a connection between the dynasties.
The Abhiras clashed with and were defeated by the Kadamba king Mayurasarman.
Answer: True
The Abhiras eventually came into conflict with the Kadamba king Mayurasarman, resulting in their defeat and contributing to their declining regional influence.
Who held the position of *senapati* (commander-in-chief) under the Saka satrap Rudrasimha, according to the Gunda inscription?
Answer: Abhira Rudrabhuti
The Gunda inscription explicitly names Abhira Rudrabhuti as the *senapati* serving the Saka satrap Rudrasimha.
How did Emperor Samudragupta's Allahabad Pillar inscription categorize the Abhira kingdom?
Answer: As a frontier kingdom paying tribute.
The inscription lists the Abhira kingdom as a frontier kingdom that acknowledged Samudragupta's suzerainty and paid tribute.
Which dynasty did V.V. Mirashi identify as feudatories of the Abhiras?
Answer: The Traikutakas
V.V. Mirashi identified the Traikutakas, among other dynasties, as feudatories or subordinate rulers under the Abhiras.
What role did the Abhiras play concerning the Satavahana dynasty?
Answer: They succeeded the Satavahana dynasty, contributing to its decline.
The Abhiras played a significant role in the decline and eventual succession of the Satavahana dynasty in the third century AD.
What temporal overlap suggests a connection between the Traikutaka and Abhira dynasties?
Answer: The Traikuta rule in Aparanta began around the same time as Ishwarsena's rule.
The contemporaneous start of Ishwarsena's rule and the Traikuta rule in Aparanta suggests a significant connection or continuity between the two dynasties.
Against which Kadamba king did the Abhiras eventually clash and suffer defeat?
Answer: Mayurasarman
The Abhiras experienced a significant defeat when they clashed with the Kadamba king Mayurasarman.
What role did some Abhiras play in relation to the Western Satraps?
Answer: They served as generals and gained influence at their court.
Certain Abhiras entered the service of the Western Satraps, functioning as generals and acquiring considerable influence within their administration.
The term 'Gavali rajas' suggests that the Abhira kings were primarily merchants before ascending to kingship.
Answer: False
The term 'Gavali rajas' suggests that the Abhira kings were originally cowherds, not merchants.
The Abhiras exclusively spoke Sanskrit and did not use any other languages.
Answer: False
Evidence indicates that the Abhiras spoke Apabhramsha and Maharashtri Prakrit, in addition to using Sanskrit, rather than exclusively Sanskrit.
The flourishing of guilds in the Abhira kingdom suggests a period of economic instability and insecurity.
Answer: False
The flourishing of guilds indicates a stable economic environment, not instability or insecurity.
The Abhiras primarily used Prakrit languages, with no evidence of Sanskrit usage.
Answer: False
While the Abhiras used Prakrit languages, there is also evidence of their usage and patronage of Sanskrit, as seen in inscriptions.
What does the term 'Gavali rajas' imply about the Abhira rulers?
Answer: They were originally cowherds.
The term 'Gavali rajas' suggests that the Abhira rulers had a background as cowherds prior to their ascension to kingship.
What languages were spoken by the Abhira people, according to the provided text?
Answer: Apabhramsha, Sanskrit, and Prakrit
The Abhira people utilized Apabhramsha and Maharashtri Prakrit, alongside Sanskrit, in their linguistic practices.
The presence of flourishing guilds during the Abhira period suggests what about their society?
Answer: A stable economic environment with peace and order.
The existence of prosperous guilds indicates a societal condition marked by stability, order, and security, fostering economic activity.
What does the Nasik cave inscription of Isvarsena primarily demonstrate about the language used during his reign?
Answer: The significant patronage and use of Sanskrit.
The Nasik cave inscription of Ishwarsena, predominantly written in Sanskrit, highlights the importance and use of Sanskrit for official purposes during his rule.
The later Abhiras established their capital at Junagadh in Western Saurashtra.
Answer: False
The capital of the later Abhiras in Saurashtra was Vamanshtali (modern Vanthali), not Junagadh.
Graharipu was an Abhira ruler in Saurashtra known for defeating the Saindhavas and Chaulukyas.
Answer: True
Graharipu, an influential Abhira ruler in Saurashtra, achieved prominence by defeating regional rivals such as the Saindhavas and Chaulukyas.
Where was the capital of the later Abhira rulers in Saurashtra?
Answer: Vamanshtali (modern Vanthali)
The capital of the later Abhira rulers in Saurashtra was Vamanshtali, identified with modern Vanthali.
Which ruler among the later Abhiras in Saurashtra gained significant power and defeated regional rivals?
Answer: Graharipu
Graharipu was a notable Abhira ruler in Saurashtra who consolidated power by defeating regional adversaries like the Saindhavas and Chaulukyas.
The Abhira dynasty's influence diminished significantly after the reign of Abhira Vashishthiputra Vasusena.
Answer: True
The dynasty's sovereign status and influence likely declined following the reign of Abhira Vashishthiputra Vasusena.
The Vakataka and Kadamba dynasties were subordinate to the Abhiras during their peak.
Answer: False
The Vakataka and Kadamba dynasties rose to prominence as the Abhira dynasty's influence declined, rather than being subordinate during the Abhira peak.
The Abhiras were ultimately supplanted by their own feudatories, the Traikutakas.
Answer: True
Historical analysis indicates that the Traikutakas, who were feudatories of the Abhiras, eventually supplanted them as rulers.
Petty Abhira chieftains continued to rule in the Vidarbha and Khandesh regions until around 500 AD.
Answer: False
Petty Abhira chieftains continued to rule in Vidarbha and Khandesh until approximately 370 AD, not 500 AD.
Which neighboring dynasties rose to prominence as the Abhira dynasty's paramount status declined?
Answer: The Vakatakas and Kadambas
As the Abhira dynasty's influence waned, the Vakataka dynasty in the north and the Kadamba dynasty in the southwest emerged as significant regional powers.
Who ultimately took over the domains of the main Abhira dynasty?
Answer: The Traikutakas
The Traikutakas, previously feudatories of the Abhiras, ultimately assumed control over the domains of the main Abhira dynasty.
What happened to the Abhira domains after the death of Abhira Vashishthiputra Vasusena?
Answer: They were diminished due to the rise of powerful neighboring dynasties.
Following the reign of Abhira Vashishthiputra Vasusena, the Abhira domains experienced a decline due to the ascendancy of neighboring powers.
Historian Yaaminey Mubayi believes the Kalachuris and Chalukyas have no connection to the Abhiras.
Answer: False
Historian Yaaminey Mubayi believes that the Kalachuris and Chalukyas, among other dynasties, *do* have a connection to the Abhiras, tracing their origins back to them.
According to historian Yaaminey Mubayi, which prominent later dynasties are believed to have descended from the Abhiras?
Answer: The Kalachuris, Chalukyas, Rashtrakutas, and the Seuna Yadavas
Historian Yaaminey Mubayi posits that the Kalachuris, Chalukyas, Rashtrakutas, and Seuna Yadavas trace their lineage back to the Abhiras.
What does the lineage tracing of later dynasties back to the Abhiras signify regarding ancient Indian social structures?
Answer: The assimilation of politically strong groups into the Brahmanical caste order.
The integration of dynasties tracing their origins to the Abhiras into the Brahmanical caste order illustrates complex processes of social mobility and assimilation in ancient India.