Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


All-Women Shortlists: Policies and Political Representation

At a Glance

Title: All-Women Shortlists: Policies and Political Representation

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Foundations of All-Women Shortlists: 7 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Implementation in the UK: 11 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Legal Framework and Debates: 9 flashcards, 7 questions
  • Impact and Outcomes: 13 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Criticisms and Controversies: 7 flashcards, 8 questions
  • International Perspectives and Alternatives: 7 flashcards, 9 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 54
  • True/False Questions: 28
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 26
  • Total Questions: 54

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about All-Women Shortlists: Policies and Political Representation

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "All-women shortlist" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: All-Women Shortlists: Policies and Political Representation

Study Guide: All-Women Shortlists: Policies and Political Representation

Foundations of All-Women Shortlists

In the 1990s, preceding the widespread adoption of AWS, women constituted less than 10% of Members of Parliament in the UK House of Commons.

Answer: True

Prior to the significant implementation of all-women shortlists in the 1990s, the representation of women in the UK House of Commons was notably low, accounting for less than 10% of all MPs.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the mention of Jacqui Smith relate to the use of AWS?: The source notes that Jacqui Smith, who became the UK's first female Home Secretary, was elected to Parliament utilizing an all-women shortlist, serving as an example of the policy's potential to advance women into prominent political roles.
  • What was the representation of women in the UK House of Commons in the 1990s before the widespread adoption of AWS?: In the 1990s, prior to the significant implementation of all-women shortlists, women constituted less than 10% of the Members of Parliament in the House of Commons. This low representation prompted political parties to explore strategies for increasing female participation.

What is the fundamental definition and primary objective of 'all-women shortlists' (AWS) as delineated in the provided source material?

Answer: An affirmative action practice in the UK aimed at increasing the proportion of female MPs by allowing only women candidates in specific constituencies.

The source identifies all-women shortlists (AWS) as an affirmative action practice in the United Kingdom. Their principal aim is to augment the proportion of female Members of Parliament (MPs) by permitting only women to contend as candidates in designated constituencies for a given political party. This approach constitutes a form of positive discrimination intended to mitigate the historical underrepresentation of women in political spheres.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article imply about the long-term sustainability of AWS in light of the Equality Act 2010?: The article implies that the legal basis for all-women shortlists, as established by the Equality Act 2010, is temporary due to a sunset clause extending the allowance until 2030, suggesting potential future phasing out or evolution of the practice.
  • What is the fundamental definition and primary objective of 'all-women shortlists' (AWS)?: All-women shortlists (AWS) constitute an affirmative action practice implemented within the United Kingdom. Their principal objective is to enhance the proportion of female Members of Parliament (MPs) by designating specific constituencies where only women are permitted to stand as candidates for a given political party. This strategy functions as a form of positive discrimination, designed to address the historical underrepresentation of women in political life.
  • What is the 'shortdescription' provided at the beginning of the article regarding all-women shortlists?: The 'shortdescription' states that 'All-women shortlist' is an affirmative action practice implemented in the United Kingdom.

Prior to the significant implementation of AWS in the 1990s, what proportion of MPs in the UK House of Commons were women?

Answer: Less than 10%

Before the widespread adoption of all-women shortlists in the 1990s, the representation of women in the UK House of Commons was below 10%, highlighting the historical underrepresentation that such policies sought to address.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the mention of Jacqui Smith relate to the use of AWS?: The source notes that Jacqui Smith, who became the UK's first female Home Secretary, was elected to Parliament utilizing an all-women shortlist, serving as an example of the policy's potential to advance women into prominent political roles.
  • What was the representation of women in the UK House of Commons in the 1990s before the widespread adoption of AWS?: In the 1990s, prior to the significant implementation of all-women shortlists, women constituted less than 10% of the Members of Parliament in the House of Commons. This low representation prompted political parties to explore strategies for increasing female participation.
  • How did David Cameron's position on all-women shortlists evolve over time?: David Cameron initially opposed all-women shortlists but later reversed his stance, indicating a willingness to consider their imposition due to the slow progress in achieving adequate representation for women.

What does the concept of 'critical mass,' mentioned in the article, refer to in the context of representation?

Answer: The minimum number of women needed within a body to influence decision-making.

In the context of representation, 'critical mass' refers to the minimum threshold of individuals from a particular group, such as women, required within an institution to exert influence on decision-making processes and policy outcomes.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the 'critical mass' concept, referenced in the 'See also' section, pertain to in the context of representation?: The 'critical mass' concept refers to the minimum number or proportion of individuals from a specific group, such as women, required within an institution to exert influence on decision-making processes and policy outcomes. Achieving critical mass is often a goal of representation-enhancing policies.

Implementation in the UK

The Labour Party ceased utilizing all-women shortlists for general elections in March 2022.

Answer: True

In March 2022, the Labour Party discontinued the use of all-women shortlists for general election purposes, reportedly due to legal advice concerning potential unlawfulness under the Equality Act, particularly after achieving a majority of female MPs.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the Labour Party discontinue the use of all-women shortlists for general elections, and what was the reported reason?: The Labour Party ceased utilizing all-women shortlists for general election purposes in March 2022. This decision was reportedly influenced by legal advice suggesting potential contravention of the Equality Act, particularly after the party had achieved a majority of female MPs.
  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.
  • How did the Labour Party's approach to candidate selection evolve leading up to the 1997 general election?: For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party initially implemented a policy ensuring at least one statutory female candidate on each shortlist. Following polling data indicating lower female support, the party formally introduced all-women shortlists at their 1993 conference, aiming to increase female representation significantly.

The Conservative Party actively implemented mandatory all-women shortlists across a majority of constituencies during the 1990s.

Answer: False

The Conservative Party did not actively implement mandatory all-women shortlists across most constituencies in the 1990s; instead, they favored alternative strategies such as encouraging voluntary selection of female candidates.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the representation of women in the UK House of Commons in the 1990s before the widespread adoption of AWS?: In the 1990s, prior to the significant implementation of all-women shortlists, women constituted less than 10% of the Members of Parliament in the House of Commons. This low representation prompted political parties to explore strategies for increasing female participation.
  • Beyond all-women shortlists, what alternative strategies did political parties employ in the 1990s to augment female representation?: In addition to all-women shortlists, political parties in the UK utilized other strategies during the 1990s, including actively encouraging women to pursue candidacies, urging constituency associations to select female candidates, and providing specialized training for potential female candidates.
  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.

For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats.

Answer: True

In preparation for the 1997 general election, the Labour Party implemented all-women shortlists for candidate selection in approximately 50% of its winnable constituencies.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.
  • How did the Labour Party's approach to candidate selection evolve leading up to the 1997 general election?: For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party initially implemented a policy ensuring at least one statutory female candidate on each shortlist. Following polling data indicating lower female support, the party formally introduced all-women shortlists at their 1993 conference, aiming to increase female representation significantly.
  • How successful were Labour's AWS candidates in securing election during the 1997 general election?: During the 1997 general election, a substantial majority of Labour candidates selected through all-women shortlists achieved electoral success, with 35 out of 38 candidates being elected to Parliament.

The Liberal Democrats employed a 'zipping' method, alternating male and female candidates, prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections.

Answer: True

Prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections, the Liberal Democrats utilized a 'zipping' strategy, which involved alternating male and female candidates on their electoral lists to ensure gender balance.

Related Concepts:

  • What method did the Liberal Democrats adopt to enhance female representation prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections?: Prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections, the Liberal Democrats implemented a 'zipping' system, which involved alternating male and female candidates on party lists to ensure balanced gender representation.
  • What is the 'zipper quota' system, as referenced in relation to Scandinavian countries?: The 'zipper quota' is a system where male and female candidates are alternated on a party list. For instance, the Swedish Social Democratic Workers' Party mandated this system in 1994, requiring 'every second on the list a woman' to ensure balanced representation.

In 2001, the Liberal Democrats adopted all-women shortlists as their primary strategy to enhance female representation.

Answer: False

In 2001, the Liberal Democrats rejected the use of all-women shortlists, deeming them 'illiberal,' and instead focused on setting targets for female candidates in winnable seats.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Liberal Democrats' approach to female representation in 2001 contrast with Labour's AWS policy?: In 2001, the Liberal Democrats rejected all-women shortlists as 'illiberal.' They instead focused on setting a target of 40% female candidates in winnable seats, arguing that the primary issue was a lack of female candidates rather than overt discrimination.
  • How did the Liberal Democrats' approach to candidate selection differ from Labour's AWS policy in the early 2000s?: In contrast to Labour's AWS policy, the Liberal Democrats rejected all-women shortlists in 2001, viewing them as illiberal. They instead set a target of 40% female candidates in winnable seats, arguing the issue was a lack of candidates rather than overt discrimination.
  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.

David Cameron reversed his initial opposition to AWS and later indicated he would consider imposing them due to the slow pace of representation progress.

Answer: True

David Cameron, initially opposed to all-women shortlists, later reversed his stance, stating he would consider their imposition due to the perceived slow progress in achieving adequate representation for women.

Related Concepts:

  • How did David Cameron's position on all-women shortlists evolve over time?: David Cameron initially opposed all-women shortlists but later reversed his stance, indicating a willingness to consider their imposition due to the slow progress in achieving adequate representation for women.

For the 2015 general election, the Conservative Party utilized all-women shortlists for the selection of all its candidates.

Answer: False

The Conservative Party used all-women shortlists for the selection of only a limited number of candidates for the 2015 general election, not for all its candidates.

Related Concepts:

  • What action did the Conservative Party take regarding AWS for the 2015 general election?: For the 2015 general election, the Conservative Party utilized all-women shortlists for the selection of a limited number of candidates.
  • What was the Conservative Party's stance on gender quotas and candidate selection during the period Labour employed AWS?: The Conservative Party maintained an opposition to gender quotas, preferring to persuade constituencies to select female candidates in winnable seats voluntarily, rather than imposing mandatory measures like all-women shortlists.

In March 2022, the Labour Party decided to cease utilizing all-women shortlists. What was the reported rationale for this decision?

Answer: Legal advice suggested potential unlawfulness under the Equality Act, particularly after achieving a majority of female MPs.

The Labour Party's decision in March 2022 to discontinue all-women shortlists was reportedly influenced by legal counsel indicating potential contravention of the Equality Act, especially given the party's attainment of a majority of female MPs.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the Labour Party discontinue the use of all-women shortlists for general elections, and what was the reported reason?: The Labour Party ceased utilizing all-women shortlists for general election purposes in March 2022. This decision was reportedly influenced by legal advice suggesting potential contravention of the Equality Act, particularly after the party had achieved a majority of female MPs.
  • What positive impacts have been attributed to all-women shortlists?: All-women shortlists have been credited with dismantling prejudices that hindered women's selection as candidates and discouraged their political participation. They are also associated with increased parliamentary focus on issues like women's health and childcare, and potentially enhanced female support for the Labour Party.
  • What were the principal criticisms directed at all-women shortlists?: All-women shortlists faced criticism for being undemocratic, bypassing meritocratic principles, and constituting a form of discrimination against men. The Labour Party's policy, for instance, was challenged and found unlawful under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 on these grounds.

For the 1997 general election, what specific policy did the Labour Party implement regarding candidate shortlists?

Answer: They ensured at least one statutory female candidate was on each shortlist.

For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party implemented a policy ensuring that at least one statutory female candidate was included on each shortlist. This was a precursor to the more extensive use of all-women shortlists.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Labour Party's approach to candidate selection evolve leading up to the 1997 general election?: For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party initially implemented a policy ensuring at least one statutory female candidate on each shortlist. Following polling data indicating lower female support, the party formally introduced all-women shortlists at their 1993 conference, aiming to increase female representation significantly.
  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.
  • How successful were Labour's AWS candidates in securing election during the 1997 general election?: During the 1997 general election, a substantial majority of Labour candidates selected through all-women shortlists achieved electoral success, with 35 out of 38 candidates being elected to Parliament.

Which strategy did the Conservative Party prefer over mandatory gender quotas like AWS for increasing female representation?

Answer: Actively persuading constituencies to select female candidates voluntarily.

The Conservative Party favored a strategy of actively persuading constituency associations to voluntarily select female candidates, rather than implementing mandatory gender quotas or all-women shortlists.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Conservative Party's stance on gender quotas and candidate selection during the period Labour employed AWS?: The Conservative Party maintained an opposition to gender quotas, preferring to persuade constituencies to select female candidates in winnable seats voluntarily, rather than imposing mandatory measures like all-women shortlists.
  • What is the fundamental definition and primary objective of 'all-women shortlists' (AWS)?: All-women shortlists (AWS) constitute an affirmative action practice implemented within the United Kingdom. Their principal objective is to enhance the proportion of female Members of Parliament (MPs) by designating specific constituencies where only women are permitted to stand as candidates for a given political party. This strategy functions as a form of positive discrimination, designed to address the historical underrepresentation of women in political life.
  • How did David Cameron's position on all-women shortlists evolve over time?: David Cameron initially opposed all-women shortlists but later reversed his stance, indicating a willingness to consider their imposition due to the slow progress in achieving adequate representation for women.

What system did the Liberal Democrats employ before the 1999 European Parliament elections to ensure gender balance?

Answer: A 'zipping' method of alternating candidates

Prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections, the Liberal Democrats utilized a 'zipping' method, which involved alternating male and female candidates on their electoral lists to achieve gender balance.

Related Concepts:

  • What method did the Liberal Democrats adopt to enhance female representation prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections?: Prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections, the Liberal Democrats implemented a 'zipping' system, which involved alternating male and female candidates on party lists to ensure balanced gender representation.
  • How did the Liberal Democrats' approach to candidate selection differ from Labour's AWS policy in the early 2000s?: In contrast to Labour's AWS policy, the Liberal Democrats rejected all-women shortlists in 2001, viewing them as illiberal. They instead set a target of 40% female candidates in winnable seats, arguing the issue was a lack of candidates rather than overt discrimination.
  • How did the Liberal Democrats' approach to female representation in 2001 contrast with Labour's AWS policy?: In 2001, the Liberal Democrats rejected all-women shortlists as 'illiberal.' They instead focused on setting a target of 40% female candidates in winnable seats, arguing that the primary issue was a lack of female candidates rather than overt discrimination.

How did the Liberal Democrats' approach to increasing female representation in 2001 differ from Labour's AWS policy?

Answer: They rejected AWS as 'illiberal' and set a target of 40% female candidates in winnable seats.

In 2001, the Liberal Democrats rejected all-women shortlists, characterizing them as 'illiberal.' Instead, they established a target of selecting 40% female candidates in winnable seats, arguing the issue was a lack of candidates rather than overt discrimination.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Liberal Democrats' approach to candidate selection differ from Labour's AWS policy in the early 2000s?: In contrast to Labour's AWS policy, the Liberal Democrats rejected all-women shortlists in 2001, viewing them as illiberal. They instead set a target of 40% female candidates in winnable seats, arguing the issue was a lack of candidates rather than overt discrimination.
  • How did the Liberal Democrats' approach to female representation in 2001 contrast with Labour's AWS policy?: In 2001, the Liberal Democrats rejected all-women shortlists as 'illiberal.' They instead focused on setting a target of 40% female candidates in winnable seats, arguing that the primary issue was a lack of female candidates rather than overt discrimination.
  • What was the rationale behind the Labour Party's initial policy for the 1992 general election concerning female candidates?: For the 1992 general election, the Labour Party's policy was to ensure at least one statutory female candidate was included on each shortlist, representing an initial step towards increasing female representation.

Which political party utilized all-women shortlists for the selection of a limited number of candidates in the 2015 general election?

Answer: Conservative Party

The Conservative Party employed all-women shortlists for the selection of a restricted number of candidates during the 2015 general election.

Related Concepts:

  • What action did the Conservative Party take regarding AWS for the 2015 general election?: For the 2015 general election, the Conservative Party utilized all-women shortlists for the selection of a limited number of candidates.
  • What is the fundamental definition and primary objective of 'all-women shortlists' (AWS)?: All-women shortlists (AWS) constitute an affirmative action practice implemented within the United Kingdom. Their principal objective is to enhance the proportion of female Members of Parliament (MPs) by designating specific constituencies where only women are permitted to stand as candidates for a given political party. This strategy functions as a form of positive discrimination, designed to address the historical underrepresentation of women in political life.

Legal Framework and Debates

In December 1995, an industrial tribunal ruled that Labour's all-women shortlist policy was lawful under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

Answer: False

Contrary to the statement, an industrial tribunal ruled in January 1996 (following a challenge initiated in December 1995) that Labour's all-women shortlist policy was unlawful under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, as it prevented men from consideration.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, and why was it significant in relation to AWS?: The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 was a UK law preventing sex-based discrimination. It became significant when an industrial tribunal ruled in 1996 that Labour's all-women shortlists were unlawful under this Act, as they excluded male candidates.
  • What was the outcome of the legal challenge against Labour's all-women shortlist policy in 1996?: In January 1996, an industrial tribunal unanimously ruled Labour's all-women shortlists unlawful under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, as they prevented male applicants from entering the profession. While existing selections were permitted, unfinished AWS selections were suspended.
  • What legal challenge did the Labour Party's all-women shortlist policy confront in the mid-1990s?: In December 1995, the Labour Party's all-women shortlist policy faced a legal challenge from Peter Jepson and Roger Dyas-Elliott, who argued they were illegally barred from consideration due to their gender. The Equal Opportunities Commission supported their claim.

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 prohibited political parties from utilizing positive discrimination in candidate selection.

Answer: False

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 did not prohibit positive discrimination; rather, it legalized the use of such practices, including all-women shortlists, by political parties in candidate selection.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permit political parties to do regarding candidate selection?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permitted political parties to employ positive discrimination in the selection of candidates, thereby legalizing practices such as all-women shortlists that had previously been deemed unlawful.
  • What legislative change occurred in 2002 concerning positive discrimination in candidate selection?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 was introduced, which legalized the use of positive discrimination by political parties in the selection of candidates, thereby providing a legal framework for practices such as all-women shortlists.
  • What was the duration for which all-women shortlists were legalized under the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 legalized all-women shortlists with a 'sunset clause' that set an expiration date at the end of 2015. This period was later extended to 2030 under the Equality Act 2010.

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 initially legalized AWS with a 'sunset clause' expiring at the end of 2015.

Answer: True

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 included a 'sunset clause' that initially permitted the legalization of all-women shortlists only until the conclusion of 2015.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permit political parties to do regarding candidate selection?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permitted political parties to employ positive discrimination in the selection of candidates, thereby legalizing practices such as all-women shortlists that had previously been deemed unlawful.
  • What does the article imply about the long-term sustainability of AWS in light of the Equality Act 2010?: The article implies that the legal basis for all-women shortlists, as established by the Equality Act 2010, is temporary due to a sunset clause extending the allowance until 2030, suggesting potential future phasing out or evolution of the practice.
  • How did David Cameron's position on all-women shortlists evolve over time?: David Cameron initially opposed all-women shortlists but later reversed his stance, indicating a willingness to consider their imposition due to the slow progress in achieving adequate representation for women.

The Equality Act 2010 extended the legal allowance for practices like AWS until the year 2030.

Answer: True

The Equality Act 2010 incorporated a 'sunset clause' that extended the legal permissibility of practices such as all-women shortlists, originally set to expire in 2015, to the year 2030.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article imply about the long-term sustainability of AWS in light of the Equality Act 2010?: The article implies that the legal basis for all-women shortlists, as established by the Equality Act 2010, is temporary due to a sunset clause extending the allowance until 2030, suggesting potential future phasing out or evolution of the practice.
  • What is the Equality Act 2010, and what is its relevance to AWS?: The Equality Act 2010 is a UK law consolidating anti-discrimination legislation. It is relevant to all-women shortlists as it extended the legal allowance for such practices, including a sunset clause originally set for 2015, later extended to 2030.

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 had a significant effect on candidate selection policies. What was its primary impact?

Answer: It legalized the use of positive discrimination, such as AWS, by political parties.

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 legalized the practice of positive discrimination by political parties in candidate selection, thereby providing a legal basis for measures like all-women shortlists.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permit political parties to do regarding candidate selection?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permitted political parties to employ positive discrimination in the selection of candidates, thereby legalizing practices such as all-women shortlists that had previously been deemed unlawful.
  • What legislative change occurred in 2002 concerning positive discrimination in candidate selection?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 was introduced, which legalized the use of positive discrimination by political parties in the selection of candidates, thereby providing a legal framework for practices such as all-women shortlists.
  • What is the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, and why was it significant in relation to AWS?: The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 was a UK law preventing sex-based discrimination. It became significant when an industrial tribunal ruled in 1996 that Labour's all-women shortlists were unlawful under this Act, as they excluded male candidates.

What was the initial expiration date stipulated by the 'sunset clause' within the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002?

Answer: End of 2015

The 'sunset clause' within the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 initially set the expiration date for the legalization of practices like all-women shortlists to the end of 2015.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'sunset clause' mentioned in relation to the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002?: The 'sunset clause' in the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 indicated that the legalization of practices like all-women shortlists was temporary, scheduled to expire at the end of 2015. This deadline was later extended to 2030 under the Equality Act 2010.
  • What was the duration for which all-women shortlists were legalized under the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 legalized all-women shortlists with a 'sunset clause' that set an expiration date at the end of 2015. This period was later extended to 2030 under the Equality Act 2010.
  • What did the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permit political parties to do regarding candidate selection?: The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 permitted political parties to employ positive discrimination in the selection of candidates, thereby legalizing practices such as all-women shortlists that had previously been deemed unlawful.

What does the 'sunset clause' associated with the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 imply regarding the legality of AWS?

Answer: It indicated that the legalization of AWS was temporary and scheduled to expire.

The 'sunset clause' within the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 signified that the legalization of practices like all-women shortlists was intended to be temporary, with a predetermined expiration date.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article imply about the long-term sustainability of AWS in light of the Equality Act 2010?: The article implies that the legal basis for all-women shortlists, as established by the Equality Act 2010, is temporary due to a sunset clause extending the allowance until 2030, suggesting potential future phasing out or evolution of the practice.
  • What is the significance of the 'sunset clause' mentioned in relation to the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002?: The 'sunset clause' in the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 indicated that the legalization of practices like all-women shortlists was temporary, scheduled to expire at the end of 2015. This deadline was later extended to 2030 under the Equality Act 2010.

Impact and Outcomes

Labour's objective of achieving 100 female MPs following the 1997 general election was successfully attained.

Answer: True

The Labour Party's strategic use of all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election contributed to the successful achievement of its goal to have 100 female MPs elected.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.
  • How successful were Labour's AWS candidates in securing election during the 1997 general election?: During the 1997 general election, a substantial majority of Labour candidates selected through all-women shortlists achieved electoral success, with 35 out of 38 candidates being elected to Parliament.
  • How did the Labour Party's approach to candidate selection evolve leading up to the 1997 general election?: For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party initially implemented a policy ensuring at least one statutory female candidate on each shortlist. Following polling data indicating lower female support, the party formally introduced all-women shortlists at their 1993 conference, aiming to increase female representation significantly.

In the 1997 general election, the majority of Labour candidates selected via AWS were unsuccessful in securing election.

Answer: False

In the 1997 general election, a significant majority of Labour candidates selected through all-women shortlists were successful, with 35 out of 38 candidates elected to Parliament.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Labour Party's approach to candidate selection evolve leading up to the 1997 general election?: For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party initially implemented a policy ensuring at least one statutory female candidate on each shortlist. Following polling data indicating lower female support, the party formally introduced all-women shortlists at their 1993 conference, aiming to increase female representation significantly.
  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.
  • How successful were Labour's AWS candidates in securing election during the 1997 general election?: During the 1997 general election, a substantial majority of Labour candidates selected through all-women shortlists achieved electoral success, with 35 out of 38 candidates being elected to Parliament.

Labour's AWS policy contributed to an increase in the total number of female MPs to 128 following the 2005 general election.

Answer: True

The implementation of Labour's all-women shortlist policy was a contributing factor to the rise in the total number of female MPs to 128 after the 2005 general election.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article suggest about the impact of AWS on women's support for the Labour Party?: The article suggests that the increased number of women MPs resulting from AWS and the enhanced focus on women's concerns may have led to increased electoral support for the Labour Party among female voters.
  • How did David Cameron's position on all-women shortlists evolve over time?: David Cameron initially opposed all-women shortlists but later reversed his stance, indicating a willingness to consider their imposition due to the slow progress in achieving adequate representation for women.
  • What impact did Labour's AWS policy have on the number of female MPs following the 2005 general election?: Labour's all-women shortlist policy contributed to an increase in the total number of female MPs, reaching 128 after the 2005 general election, with Labour's own women MPs constituting a significant majority of this total.

By the 2019 general election, the percentage of female representation in the UK House of Commons had surpassed 33%.

Answer: True

The data indicates that by the 2019 general election, the proportion of women serving as MPs in the UK House of Commons had exceeded 33%.

Related Concepts:

  • What trend in female representation within Parliament was observed by the 2017 and 2019 general elections?: By the 2017 and 2019 general elections, a notable increase in female representation was observed in Parliament, with the 2019 election marking the first time female representation exceeded 33% in the House of Commons.
  • According to the provided table, what was the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019?: According to the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019 was 34%.
  • What is the overall trend in female representation in the UK House of Commons from 2010 to 2019, based on the table?: Based on the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons shows a consistent upward trend, increasing from 22% in 2010 to 34% in 2019.

According to the provided table, the Liberal Democrats had the highest percentage of women MPs among their elected members in 2019.

Answer: True

The table data shows that in 2019, the Liberal Democrats recorded the highest proportion of women MPs within their parliamentary contingent, with 64% of their elected members being women.

Related Concepts:

  • Which party exhibited the highest percentage of female MPs represented in 2019, according to the table?: According to the table, the Liberal Democrats had the highest percentage of female MPs represented in 2019, with 64% of their elected members being women.
  • What was the outcome for the Liberal Democrats in the 2015 general election concerning the percentage of women MPs, according to the table?: According to the table, the Liberal Democrats had 0% women MPs in the 2015 general election, representing a notable decline from previous elections and contrasting with trends in other parties.
  • According to the provided table, what was the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019?: According to the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019 was 34%.

A credited positive impact of AWS is that they reinforced societal prejudices that previously hindered women's selection as candidates.

Answer: False

A credited positive impact of AWS is the dismantling, rather than reinforcement, of societal prejudices that previously impeded women's selection as candidates. The statement incorrectly posits reinforcement of prejudices.

Related Concepts:

  • What unintended consequences or criticisms regarding merit have been associated with AWS?: While AWS can address systemic barriers, they may foster the perception that female candidates are selected based on quotas rather than merit. This perception could potentially undermine the legitimacy of the candidates or the policy itself.
  • How does the mention of Jacqui Smith relate to the use of AWS?: The source notes that Jacqui Smith, who became the UK's first female Home Secretary, was elected to Parliament utilizing an all-women shortlist, serving as an example of the policy's potential to advance women into prominent political roles.
  • What does the article suggest about the impact of AWS on women's support for the Labour Party?: The article suggests that the increased number of women MPs resulting from AWS and the enhanced focus on women's concerns may have led to increased electoral support for the Labour Party among female voters.

Jacqui Smith, who became the first female UK Home Secretary, was elected to Parliament utilizing an all-women shortlist.

Answer: True

The source indicates that Jacqui Smith, who later served as the UK's first female Home Secretary, was elected to Parliament through the mechanism of an all-women shortlist.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the mention of Jacqui Smith relate to the use of AWS?: The source notes that Jacqui Smith, who became the UK's first female Home Secretary, was elected to Parliament utilizing an all-women shortlist, serving as an example of the policy's potential to advance women into prominent political roles.

The overall percentage of women MPs in the UK House of Commons increased from approximately 22% in 2010 to 34% in 2019.

Answer: True

Data indicates a progressive increase in female representation within the UK House of Commons, rising from approximately 22% in 2010 to 34% by the 2019 general election.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the overall trend in female representation in the UK House of Commons from 2010 to 2019, based on the table?: Based on the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons shows a consistent upward trend, increasing from 22% in 2010 to 34% in 2019.
  • According to the provided table, what was the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019?: According to the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019 was 34%.
  • What trend in female representation within Parliament was observed by the 2017 and 2019 general elections?: By the 2017 and 2019 general elections, a notable increase in female representation was observed in Parliament, with the 2019 election marking the first time female representation exceeded 33% in the House of Commons.

How many Labour candidates selected via all-women shortlists were elected in the 1997 general election?

Answer: 35

In the 1997 general election, 35 out of the 38 candidates selected by Labour through all-women shortlists were successful in gaining election to Parliament.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Labour Party's objective with all-women shortlists for the 1997 general election, and was this objective achieved?: The Labour Party utilized all-women shortlists to select candidates in half of its winnable seats for the 1997 general election. Their objective was to achieve 100 female MPs, a goal that was successfully met.
  • How successful were Labour's AWS candidates in securing election during the 1997 general election?: During the 1997 general election, a substantial majority of Labour candidates selected through all-women shortlists achieved electoral success, with 35 out of 38 candidates being elected to Parliament.
  • How did the Labour Party's approach to candidate selection evolve leading up to the 1997 general election?: For the 1997 general election, the Labour Party initially implemented a policy ensuring at least one statutory female candidate on each shortlist. Following polling data indicating lower female support, the party formally introduced all-women shortlists at their 1993 conference, aiming to increase female representation significantly.

Which of the following is identified in the source as a positive impact of all-women shortlists?

Answer: Increased parliamentary focus on issues such as women's health and childcare.

A positively attributed impact of all-women shortlists is the increased attention within Parliament dedicated to issues pertinent to women, including healthcare and childcare.

Related Concepts:

  • What positive impacts have been attributed to all-women shortlists?: All-women shortlists have been credited with dismantling prejudices that hindered women's selection as candidates and discouraged their political participation. They are also associated with increased parliamentary focus on issues like women's health and childcare, and potentially enhanced female support for the Labour Party.
  • What is the 'shortdescription' provided at the beginning of the article regarding all-women shortlists?: The 'shortdescription' states that 'All-women shortlist' is an affirmative action practice implemented in the United Kingdom.
  • What does the article imply about the long-term sustainability of AWS in light of the Equality Act 2010?: The article implies that the legal basis for all-women shortlists, as established by the Equality Act 2010, is temporary due to a sunset clause extending the allowance until 2030, suggesting potential future phasing out or evolution of the practice.

According to the table data, what percentage of MPs were women in the House of Commons in 2019?

Answer: 34%

The data presented in the table indicates that by the 2019 general election, 34% of the Members of Parliament in the House of Commons were women.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the provided table, what was the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019?: According to the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019 was 34%.
  • What is the overall trend in female representation in the UK House of Commons from 2010 to 2019, based on the table?: Based on the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons shows a consistent upward trend, increasing from 22% in 2010 to 34% in 2019.
  • What was the percentage of women MPs for the Conservative Party in 2019, according to the table?: According to the table, the percentage of women MPs for the Conservative Party in 2019 was 24%.

In 2019, which party, according to the table, had the highest proportion of its own MPs being women?

Answer: Liberal Democrats

According to the table data for 2019, the Liberal Democrats exhibited the highest proportion of women among their elected Members of Parliament, with 64% of their MPs being women.

Related Concepts:

  • Which party exhibited the highest percentage of female MPs represented in 2019, according to the table?: According to the table, the Liberal Democrats had the highest percentage of female MPs represented in 2019, with 64% of their elected members being women.
  • What was the percentage of women MPs for the Conservative Party in 2019, according to the table?: According to the table, the percentage of women MPs for the Conservative Party in 2019 was 24%.
  • According to the provided table, what was the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019?: According to the table, the overall percentage of women MPs in the House of Commons in 2019 was 34%.

What connection does the article suggest between an increase in female MPs and parliamentary priorities?

Answer: Increased attention to issues such as women's health and childcare.

The article posits a connection between the rise in the number of female MPs and a subsequent increase in parliamentary focus on issues such as women's health and childcare.

Related Concepts:

  • What connection does the article suggest between an increase in female MPs and parliamentary priorities?: The article suggests that the increase in female representation, partly facilitated by measures like AWS, led to greater parliamentary attention on issues such as women's health, domestic violence, and childcare.

Criticisms and Controversies

All-women shortlists (AWS) are primarily employed in the United Kingdom with the objective of increasing the representation of male Members of Parliament.

Answer: False

The primary purpose of all-women shortlists (AWS) is to increase the proportion of female Members of Parliament, not male MPs, by allowing only women candidates in designated constituencies. This affirmative action strategy aims to address historical underrepresentation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition and primary objective of 'all-women shortlists' (AWS)?: All-women shortlists (AWS) constitute an affirmative action practice implemented within the United Kingdom. Their principal objective is to enhance the proportion of female Members of Parliament (MPs) by designating specific constituencies where only women are permitted to stand as candidates for a given political party. This strategy functions as a form of positive discrimination, designed to address the historical underrepresentation of women in political life.
  • What was the representation of women in the UK House of Commons in the 1990s before the widespread adoption of AWS?: In the 1990s, prior to the significant implementation of all-women shortlists, women constituted less than 10% of the Members of Parliament in the House of Commons. This low representation prompted political parties to explore strategies for increasing female participation.
  • What positive impacts have been attributed to all-women shortlists?: All-women shortlists have been credited with dismantling prejudices that hindered women's selection as candidates and discouraged their political participation. They are also associated with increased parliamentary focus on issues like women's health and childcare, and potentially enhanced female support for the Labour Party.

The loss of the Blaenau Gwent seat for Labour in the 2005 election was attributed to the strong performance of their AWS candidate.

Answer: False

The loss of the Blaenau Gwent seat for Labour in the 2005 election was attributed to the success of an independent candidate running on an anti-AWS platform, rather than the performance of the AWS candidate.

Related Concepts:

  • What incident during the 2005 general election became associated with controversy surrounding AWS?: The loss of the Labour-held seat in Blaenau Gwent during the 2005 general election was linked to controversy over AWS, as an independent candidate running on an anti-AWS platform successfully defeated Labour's AWS candidate.

Diane Abbott praised AWS for effectively recruiting numerous ethnic minority women into politics.

Answer: False

Diane Abbott, while an early supporter, criticized all-women shortlists for inadvertently becoming 'all white women shortlists,' failing to adequately recruit ethnic minority women into politics.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticism was articulated by Diane Abbott regarding the effect of AWS on ethnic minority representation?: Diane Abbott criticized all-women shortlists for inadvertently becoming 'all white women shortlists,' highlighting their failure to effectively recruit ethnic minority women into politics.
  • How does the mention of Jacqui Smith relate to the use of AWS?: The source notes that Jacqui Smith, who became the UK's first female Home Secretary, was elected to Parliament utilizing an all-women shortlist, serving as an example of the policy's potential to advance women into prominent political roles.

Ann Widdecombe argued that all-women shortlists represented the type of special privileges the suffragettes actively opposed.

Answer: True

Ann Widdecombe articulated a critique of all-women shortlists, positing that they constituted special privileges, which she argued the suffragettes would have opposed in their fight for equal opportunities.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Ann Widdecombe's critique of all-women shortlists?: Ann Widdecombe criticized all-women shortlists by arguing they represented special privileges, which she contended the suffragettes would have opposed in their pursuit of equal opportunities.

A primary criticism of AWS is that they are inherently democratic and consistently uphold meritocratic principles in candidate selection.

Answer: False

A principal criticism leveled against all-women shortlists is that they are considered undemocratic and potentially undermine meritocratic principles in candidate selection, rather than upholding them.

Related Concepts:

  • What unintended consequences or criticisms regarding merit have been associated with AWS?: While AWS can address systemic barriers, they may foster the perception that female candidates are selected based on quotas rather than merit. This perception could potentially undermine the legitimacy of the candidates or the policy itself.

The loss of the Blaenau Gwent seat for Labour in the 2005 general election was notably linked to what factor concerning AWS?

Answer: An independent candidate ran successfully on an anti-AWS platform.

The loss of the Labour seat in Blaenau Gwent during the 2005 general election was significantly linked to the successful campaign of an independent candidate who ran on an anti-all-women shortlist platform.

Related Concepts:

  • What incident during the 2005 general election became associated with controversy surrounding AWS?: The loss of the Labour-held seat in Blaenau Gwent during the 2005 general election was linked to controversy over AWS, as an independent candidate running on an anti-AWS platform successfully defeated Labour's AWS candidate.

What criticism did Diane Abbott voice regarding the impact of AWS on ethnic minority representation?

Answer: AWS had inadvertently become 'all white women shortlists,' failing to include ethnic minority women.

Diane Abbott expressed criticism that all-women shortlists had inadvertently resulted in 'all white women shortlists,' highlighting their failure to adequately incorporate ethnic minority women into political representation.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticism was articulated by Diane Abbott regarding the effect of AWS on ethnic minority representation?: Diane Abbott criticized all-women shortlists for inadvertently becoming 'all white women shortlists,' highlighting their failure to effectively recruit ethnic minority women into politics.

What was a primary criticism directed at all-women shortlists?

Answer: They were considered undemocratic and potentially discriminatory against men.

A principal criticism leveled against all-women shortlists is that they are perceived as undemocratic and potentially discriminatory against men, as they restrict candidacy based on gender.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the principal criticisms directed at all-women shortlists?: All-women shortlists faced criticism for being undemocratic, bypassing meritocratic principles, and constituting a form of discrimination against men. The Labour Party's policy, for instance, was challenged and found unlawful under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 on these grounds.
  • What was Ann Widdecombe's critique of all-women shortlists?: Ann Widdecombe criticized all-women shortlists by arguing they represented special privileges, which she contended the suffragettes would have opposed in their pursuit of equal opportunities.
  • What positive impacts have been attributed to all-women shortlists?: All-women shortlists have been credited with dismantling prejudices that hindered women's selection as candidates and discouraged their political participation. They are also associated with increased parliamentary focus on issues like women's health and childcare, and potentially enhanced female support for the Labour Party.

International Perspectives and Alternatives

The 'zipper quota' system involves alternating male and female candidates on a party's list of preferred candidates.

Answer: True

The 'zipper quota' system is characterized by the alternating placement of male and female candidates on a political party's list, ensuring a balanced gender representation in the order of selection.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'zipper quota' system, as referenced in relation to Scandinavian countries?: The 'zipper quota' is a system where male and female candidates are alternated on a party list. For instance, the Swedish Social Democratic Workers' Party mandated this system in 1994, requiring 'every second on the list a woman' to ensure balanced representation.
  • What method did the Liberal Democrats adopt to enhance female representation prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections?: Prior to the 1999 European Parliament elections, the Liberal Democrats implemented a 'zipping' system, which involved alternating male and female candidates on party lists to ensure balanced gender representation.

In Iraq's January 2005 parliamentary elections, the electoral law mandated the compulsory integration of women onto candidate lists.

Answer: True

Iraq's electoral legislation for the January 2005 parliamentary elections stipulated the mandatory inclusion of women on candidate lists as a measure to enhance female representation.

Related Concepts:

  • What measure did Iraq implement in its January 2005 parliamentary elections to increase female representation?: Iraq's electoral law for its January 2005 parliamentary elections mandated the compulsory integration of women onto candidate lists, a strategy similar to those employed in several European countries with proportional representation systems.

South Korea's National Assembly requires women to hold 50% of the seats in single-member constituencies.

Answer: False

South Korea's National Assembly requires women to hold 30% of the seats in single-member constituencies, not 50%. The 50% requirement applies to proportionally elected seats.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the gender quota requirement for South Korea's National Assembly concerning single-member constituencies?: South Korea's National Assembly requires women to hold 30% of the seats in single-member constituencies. However, major parties often nominate fewer women for these seats, impacting overall representation.
  • What challenges affect the effective implementation of gender quotas in South Korea's National Assembly?: Challenges in South Korea include the lack of routinized candidate selection processes, which allows party leaders significant discretion to circumvent gender quotas, resulting in fewer women nominated for key positions.

What does the 'zipper quota' system, mentioned in relation to Scandinavian countries, entail?

Answer: Alternating male and female candidates on party lists.

The 'zipper quota' system, observed in contexts like Scandinavian countries, involves the practice of alternating male and female candidates on political party lists to ensure balanced gender representation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'zipper quota' system, as referenced in relation to Scandinavian countries?: The 'zipper quota' is a system where male and female candidates are alternated on a party list. For instance, the Swedish Social Democratic Workers' Party mandated this system in 1994, requiring 'every second on the list a woman' to ensure balanced representation.

What measure did Iraq adopt in its January 2005 parliamentary elections to enhance female representation?

Answer: Compulsorily including women on candidate lists.

In its January 2005 parliamentary elections, Iraq implemented a measure requiring the compulsory inclusion of women on candidate lists, a strategy aimed at increasing female representation.

Related Concepts:

  • What measure did Iraq implement in its January 2005 parliamentary elections to increase female representation?: Iraq's electoral law for its January 2005 parliamentary elections mandated the compulsory integration of women onto candidate lists, a strategy similar to those employed in several European countries with proportional representation systems.

According to the source, approximately how many Latin American countries have implemented legislative gender quotas?

Answer: Fourteen

The source indicates that fourteen Latin American countries have implemented gender quotas within their legislative frameworks.

Related Concepts:

  • Approximately how many Latin American countries have implemented legislative gender quotas, according to the source?: According to the source, fourteen Latin American countries have implemented gender quotas for their legislatures.

What challenge impedes the effective implementation of gender quotas in South Korea's National Assembly, according to the text?

Answer: Party leaders can often circumvent the quotas during candidate selection.

A significant challenge to the effective implementation of gender quotas in South Korea's National Assembly stems from the candidate selection process, where party leaders possess considerable influence and can circumvent established quotas.

Related Concepts:

  • What challenges affect the effective implementation of gender quotas in South Korea's National Assembly?: Challenges in South Korea include the lack of routinized candidate selection processes, which allows party leaders significant discretion to circumvent gender quotas, resulting in fewer women nominated for key positions.
  • What is the gender quota requirement for South Korea's National Assembly concerning single-member constituencies?: South Korea's National Assembly requires women to hold 30% of the seats in single-member constituencies. However, major parties often nominate fewer women for these seats, impacting overall representation.

Which Canadian federal political parties initiated targets for female candidates during the 1990s?

Answer: Liberal Party and New Democratic Party (NDP)

During the 1990s, the Liberal Party and the New Democratic Party (NDP) at both federal and provincial levels in Canada began establishing targets to increase the number of female candidates, utilizing informal and internal mechanisms.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Canadian federal political parties began setting targets for female candidates in the 1990s?: In the 1990s, the Liberal Party and the New Democratic Party (NDP) at both federal and provincial levels in Canada began establishing targets to increase the number and percentage of female candidates, utilizing informal and internal mechanisms.

In 2020, the Ontario Liberal Party instituted a specific rule concerning candidate nominations. What was this rule?

Answer: A 'Women-only' nomination rule for designated electoral districts.

In 2020, the Ontario Liberal Party implemented a 'Women-only Nomination' rule, which permitted the designation of specific electoral districts where only female nomination contestants were eligible to participate in the nomination process.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific 'Women-only Nomination' rule did the Ontario Liberal Party institute in 2020?: In 2020, the Ontario Liberal Party formally instituted 'Women-only Nomination' rules, allowing the designation of specific electoral districts where only female nomination contestants were eligible to participate in the nomination process.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy