Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


Americanist Phonetic Notation: Principles, History, and Application

At a Glance

Title: Americanist Phonetic Notation: Principles, History, and Application

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Foundations and Historical Context: 10 flashcards, 21 questions
  • General Principles and Comparison with IPA: 4 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Vowel Transcription: Diacritics and Length: 7 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Consonant Transcription: Articulation and Modification: 13 flashcards, 20 questions
  • Prosodic Features and Boundary Marking: 5 flashcards, 10 questions
  • Contemporary Usage and Linguistic Debates: 6 flashcards, 10 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 45
  • True/False Questions: 32
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 50
  • Total Questions: 82

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Americanist Phonetic Notation: Principles, History, and Application

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Americanist phonetic notation" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Americanist Phonetic Notation: Principles, History, and Application

Study Guide: Americanist Phonetic Notation: Principles, History, and Application

Foundations and Historical Context

The primary purpose for the development of Americanist phonetic notation was the transcription of European languages.

Answer: False

Americanist phonetic notation was primarily developed for the phonetic and phonemic transcription of indigenous languages of the Americas, although it also found use for European languages.

Related Concepts:

  • Who originally developed Americanist phonetic notation and for what purpose?: This notation system was originally developed by European and American anthropologists and language scientists, many of whom were Neogrammarians. Its primary purpose was the phonetic and phonemic transcription of indigenous languages of the Americas, as well as languages of Europe.

John Wesley Powell was one of the earliest figures to use phonetic symbols in publications on American language families.

Answer: True

John Wesley Powell utilized an early set of phonetic symbols in his 1880 publications concerning American language families, making him a pioneering figure in this field.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was one of the earliest figures to use phonetic symbols in American language family publications?: John Wesley Powell used an early set of phonetic symbols in his publications, particularly in Powell 1880, on American language families. His choices were influenced by the work of other phoneticians and American writers.

The vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916 was based on the classification of H. Sweet.

Answer: True

The 1916 vowel chart adopted by the American Anthropological Association was indeed based on the classification system developed by H. Sweet.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a notable characteristic of the vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916?: The vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916 was based on the classification of H. Sweet. A notable characteristic was that high central vowels were differentiated by moving the centralizing dot to the left, rather than using a cross stroke.

The 1916 AAA consonant chart used the term 'surd' to refer to voiced sounds.

Answer: False

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, 'surd' referred to voiceless sounds, while 'sonant' referred to voiced sounds.

Related Concepts:

  • What does 'surd,' 'sonant,' and 'intermed.' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'surd' refers to voiceless sounds, 'sonant' refers to voiced sounds, and 'intermed.' refers to partially voiced sounds. These terms describe the presence or absence of vocal fold vibration during sound production.

The *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet, foundational to Sapir and Boas's system, presented transcriptions in bold font.

Answer: False

The *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet presented transcriptions in italic font without any other delimiters, not in bold font.

Related Concepts:

  • How is transcription presented in the *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet?: In the *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet, transcription is presented in italic font, without any other delimiters. This simple formatting convention distinguishes phonetic transcriptions within the text.
  • Which journal published an alphabet in 1907 that was foundational to Sapir and Boas's system?: The journal *Anthropos* published the alphabet to be used in its articles in 1907. This system formed the basic framework that Edward Sapir and Franz Boas later introduced to the United States for linguistic transcription.

Franz Boas used the exact same set of phonetic symbols as John Wesley Powell in his 1911 work.

Answer: False

Franz Boas utilized a 'somewhat different set of symbols' in his 1911 work compared to John Wesley Powell's earlier publications, indicating an evolution in transcription practices.

Related Concepts:

  • Which influential anthropologist used a different set of symbols in 1911?: The influential anthropologist Franz Boas used a somewhat different set of symbols in 1911. His work contributed to the evolving standards of phonetic transcription in American linguistics.
  • Who was one of the earliest figures to use phonetic symbols in American language family publications?: John Wesley Powell used an early set of phonetic symbols in his publications, particularly in Powell 1880, on American language families. His choices were influenced by the work of other phoneticians and American writers.

The American Anthropological Society's 1916 publication significantly expanded Franz Boas's alphabet.

Answer: True

The American Anthropological Society's 1916 publication indeed greatly expanded upon Franz Boas's alphabet, aiming to establish a more comprehensive system for linguistic transcription.

Related Concepts:

  • How was Boas's alphabet expanded in 1916?: In 1916, a publication by the American Anthropological Society greatly expanded upon Franz Boas's alphabet. This expansion aimed to create a more comprehensive system for transcribing indigenous languages.
  • Which journal published an alphabet in 1907 that was foundational to Sapir and Boas's system?: The journal *Anthropos* published the alphabet to be used in its articles in 1907. This system formed the basic framework that Edward Sapir and Franz Boas later introduced to the United States for linguistic transcription.

The 1916 AAA consonant chart defined 'Laryngeal' as sounds produced in the nasal cavity.

Answer: False

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, 'Laryngeal' referred to pharyngeal or epiglottal sounds, not sounds produced in the nasal cavity.

Related Concepts:

  • What does 'Laryngeal' refer to in the context of the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the context of the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'Laryngeal' refers to either pharyngeal or epiglottal sounds. These are sounds produced in the pharynx or with the epiglottis.
  • What does 'surd,' 'sonant,' and 'intermed.' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'surd' refers to voiceless sounds, 'sonant' refers to voiced sounds, and 'intermed.' refers to partially voiced sounds. These terms describe the presence or absence of vocal fold vibration during sound production.

Who primarily developed Americanist phonetic notation?

Answer: European and American anthropologists and language scientists

Americanist phonetic notation was primarily developed by European and American anthropologists and language scientists, many of whom were Neogrammarians.

Related Concepts:

  • Who originally developed Americanist phonetic notation and for what purpose?: This notation system was originally developed by European and American anthropologists and language scientists, many of whom were Neogrammarians. Its primary purpose was the phonetic and phonemic transcription of indigenous languages of the Americas, as well as languages of Europe.

Who was one of the earliest figures to use phonetic symbols in American language family publications, notably in Powell 1880?

Answer: John Wesley Powell

John Wesley Powell is recognized as one of the earliest figures to employ phonetic symbols in publications concerning American language families, as evidenced in his 1880 work.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was one of the earliest figures to use phonetic symbols in American language family publications?: John Wesley Powell used an early set of phonetic symbols in his publications, particularly in Powell 1880, on American language families. His choices were influenced by the work of other phoneticians and American writers.

What was a notable characteristic of the vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916?

Answer: High central vowels were differentiated by moving the centralizing dot to the left.

A notable feature of the 1916 AAA vowel chart was its method of differentiating high central vowels by shifting the centralizing dot to the left, rather than employing a cross stroke.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a notable characteristic of the vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916?: The vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916 was based on the classification of H. Sweet. A notable characteristic was that high central vowels were differentiated by moving the centralizing dot to the left, rather than using a cross stroke.

What does 'sonant' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?

Answer: Voiced sounds

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, the term 'sonant' was used to refer to voiced sounds, characterized by vocal fold vibration.

Related Concepts:

  • What does 'surd,' 'sonant,' and 'intermed.' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'surd' refers to voiceless sounds, 'sonant' refers to voiced sounds, and 'intermed.' refers to partially voiced sounds. These terms describe the presence or absence of vocal fold vibration during sound production.
  • How were weakly and strongly glottalized stops distinguished in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, a weakly glottalized stop (i.e., weakly ejective) was represented by a consonant plus an overhead single quotation mark (e.g., <k̓>). A strongly glottalized stop, articulated very forcefully, was represented by a different symbol (e.g., <kʼ>). This convention applied to all glottalized consonants.

How was a weakly glottalized stop represented in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?

Answer: By a consonant plus an overhead single quotation mark (e.g., <k̓>)

The 1916 AAA consonant chart represented a weakly glottalized stop by adding an overhead single quotation mark to the consonant, as in <k̓>.

Related Concepts:

  • How were weakly and strongly glottalized stops distinguished in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, a weakly glottalized stop (i.e., weakly ejective) was represented by a consonant plus an overhead single quotation mark (e.g., <k̓>). A strongly glottalized stop, articulated very forcefully, was represented by a different symbol (e.g., <kʼ>). This convention applied to all glottalized consonants.
  • What does 'surd,' 'sonant,' and 'intermed.' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'surd' refers to voiceless sounds, 'sonant' refers to voiced sounds, and 'intermed.' refers to partially voiced sounds. These terms describe the presence or absence of vocal fold vibration during sound production.

What does 'Laryngeal' refer to in the context of the 1916 AAA consonant chart?

Answer: Pharyngeal or epiglottal sounds

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, 'Laryngeal' was a classification referring to sounds produced in the pharynx or with the epiglottis.

Related Concepts:

  • What does 'Laryngeal' refer to in the context of the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the context of the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'Laryngeal' refers to either pharyngeal or epiglottal sounds. These are sounds produced in the pharynx or with the epiglottis.
  • What does 'surd,' 'sonant,' and 'intermed.' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'surd' refers to voiceless sounds, 'sonant' refers to voiced sounds, and 'intermed.' refers to partially voiced sounds. These terms describe the presence or absence of vocal fold vibration during sound production.

Which journal published an alphabet in 1907 that formed the basic framework for Edward Sapir and Franz Boas's system?

Answer: *Anthropos*

The journal *Anthropos* published an alphabet in 1907 that served as the foundational framework for the linguistic transcription system later adopted by Edward Sapir and Franz Boas.

Related Concepts:

  • Which journal published an alphabet in 1907 that was foundational to Sapir and Boas's system?: The journal *Anthropos* published the alphabet to be used in its articles in 1907. This system formed the basic framework that Edward Sapir and Franz Boas later introduced to the United States for linguistic transcription.

How is transcription presented in the *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet?

Answer: In italic font without any other delimiters

The *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet stipulated that transcriptions be presented in italic font, without the use of any additional delimiters.

Related Concepts:

  • How is transcription presented in the *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet?: In the *Anthropos* (1907) alphabet, transcription is presented in italic font, without any other delimiters. This simple formatting convention distinguishes phonetic transcriptions within the text.
  • Which journal published an alphabet in 1907 that was foundational to Sapir and Boas's system?: The journal *Anthropos* published the alphabet to be used in its articles in 1907. This system formed the basic framework that Edward Sapir and Franz Boas later introduced to the United States for linguistic transcription.

Which influential anthropologist used a 'somewhat different set of symbols' in 1911, contributing to the evolving standards of phonetic transcription?

Answer: Franz Boas

Franz Boas, an influential anthropologist, utilized a 'somewhat different set of symbols' in 1911, thereby contributing to the ongoing development of phonetic transcription standards.

Related Concepts:

  • Which influential anthropologist used a different set of symbols in 1911?: The influential anthropologist Franz Boas used a somewhat different set of symbols in 1911. His work contributed to the evolving standards of phonetic transcription in American linguistics.

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, what does 'intermed.' refer to?

Answer: Partially voiced sounds

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, 'intermed.' was the term used to denote partially voiced sounds.

Related Concepts:

  • What does 'surd,' 'sonant,' and 'intermed.' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'surd' refers to voiceless sounds, 'sonant' refers to voiced sounds, and 'intermed.' refers to partially voiced sounds. These terms describe the presence or absence of vocal fold vibration during sound production.

How was Franz Boas's alphabet expanded in 1916?

Answer: By a publication from the American Anthropological Society.

Franz Boas's alphabet was significantly expanded in 1916 through a publication issued by the American Anthropological Society.

Related Concepts:

  • How was Boas's alphabet expanded in 1916?: In 1916, a publication by the American Anthropological Society greatly expanded upon Franz Boas's alphabet. This expansion aimed to create a more comprehensive system for transcribing indigenous languages.

What was a notable characteristic of the 1916 AAA vowel chart regarding high central vowels?

Answer: They were differentiated by moving the centralizing dot to the left.

A notable characteristic of the 1916 AAA vowel chart was its method of differentiating high central vowels by shifting the centralizing dot to the left.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a notable characteristic of the vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916?: The vowel chart agreed upon by the American Anthropological Association in 1916 was based on the classification of H. Sweet. A notable characteristic was that high central vowels were differentiated by moving the centralizing dot to the left, rather than using a cross stroke.

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, what term refers to voiceless sounds?

Answer: Surd

In the 1916 AAA consonant chart, the term 'surd' was specifically used to refer to voiceless sounds.

Related Concepts:

  • What does 'surd,' 'sonant,' and 'intermed.' refer to in the 1916 AAA consonant chart?: In the 1916 American Anthropological Association (AAA) consonant chart, 'surd' refers to voiceless sounds, 'sonant' refers to voiced sounds, and 'intermed.' refers to partially voiced sounds. These terms describe the presence or absence of vocal fold vibration during sound production.

General Principles and Comparison with IPA

The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) utilizes more diacritics than Americanist notation to achieve phonemic distinctions.

Answer: False

Americanist notation employs diacritics more widely than the IPA, as the IPA aims to minimize diacritic use for phonemic distinctions, whereas Americanist notation relies on them more extensively.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the use of diacritics in Americanist notation compare to the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)?: Diacritics are more widely used in Americanist notation than in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). While the IPA aims to use as few diacritics as possible for phonemic distinctions, Americanist notation relies on them to distinguish many other phonemic distinctions in the languages it transcribes.

Over time, Americanist phonetic notation has become less similar to the IPA, retaining many of its unique and obscure symbols.

Answer: False

Americanist phonetic notation has, over time, grown increasingly similar to the IPA, abandoning many of its more obscure symbols in a trend towards standardization.

Related Concepts:

  • How has Americanist phonetic notation evolved in relation to the IPA over time?: Over the years, Americanist phonetic notation has grown increasingly similar to the IPA, and it has abandoned many of the more obscure letters it once employed. This suggests a trend towards greater standardization and ease of use in phonetic transcription.

The Americanist tradition prioritized creating phonetic notation from new, unique character designs, similar to the IPA.

Answer: False

The Americanist tradition, unlike the IPA, prioritized creating phonetic notation from characters easily derived from existing orthographies, such as Greek and East European typefaces, for practicality and cost-efficiency.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a key philosophical difference between the Americanist tradition and the IPA regarding character design?: The Americanist tradition was interested in a phonetic notation that could be easily created from typefaces of existing orthographies, prioritizing practicality and cost-efficiency by using characters already present in Greek and East European orthographies. In contrast, the IPA gave Greek and Latin letters new shapes to represent sounds.

What is one of the alternative names for Americanist phonetic notation?

Answer: North American Phonetic Alphabet

The North American Phonetic Alphabet (NAPA) is one of the recognized alternative names for Americanist phonetic notation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Americanist phonetic notation, and what are its alternative names?: Americanist phonetic notation is a system of phonetic notation also known as the North American Phonetic Alphabet (NAPA), the Americanist Phonetic Alphabet, or the American Phonetic Alphabet (APA). It is a specialized set of symbols used to represent the sounds of human speech.

How does the use of diacritics in Americanist notation generally compare to the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)?

Answer: Americanist notation uses more diacritics than IPA.

Americanist notation generally employs diacritics more extensively than the IPA, which aims to minimize their use for phonemic distinctions.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the use of diacritics in Americanist notation compare to the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)?: Diacritics are more widely used in Americanist notation than in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). While the IPA aims to use as few diacritics as possible for phonemic distinctions, Americanist notation relies on them to distinguish many other phonemic distinctions in the languages it transcribes.

What has been the general trend in the evolution of Americanist phonetic notation in relation to the IPA over time?

Answer: It has grown increasingly similar to the IPA.

Over time, Americanist phonetic notation has evolved to become increasingly similar to the IPA, having abandoned many of its previously obscure symbols.

Related Concepts:

  • How has Americanist phonetic notation evolved in relation to the IPA over time?: Over the years, Americanist phonetic notation has grown increasingly similar to the IPA, and it has abandoned many of the more obscure letters it once employed. This suggests a trend towards greater standardization and ease of use in phonetic transcription.

What was a key philosophical difference for the Americanist tradition regarding character design compared to the IPA?

Answer: Americanist tradition aimed for characters easily created from existing orthographies.

A key philosophical difference was the Americanist tradition's emphasis on using characters easily derived from existing orthographies, such as Greek and East European typefaces, for practical and cost-efficient transcription.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a key philosophical difference between the Americanist tradition and the IPA regarding character design?: The Americanist tradition was interested in a phonetic notation that could be easily created from typefaces of existing orthographies, prioritizing practicality and cost-efficiency by using characters already present in Greek and East European orthographies. In contrast, the IPA gave Greek and Latin letters new shapes to represent sounds.

Which of the following is NOT an alternative name for Americanist phonetic notation?

Answer: International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)

The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) is a distinct system of phonetic notation, not an alternative name for Americanist phonetic notation, which includes names like NAPA, Americanist Phonetic Alphabet, and APA.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Americanist phonetic notation, and what are its alternative names?: Americanist phonetic notation is a system of phonetic notation also known as the North American Phonetic Alphabet (NAPA), the Americanist Phonetic Alphabet, or the American Phonetic Alphabet (APA). It is a specialized set of symbols used to represent the sounds of human speech.

Vowel Transcription: Diacritics and Length

In Americanist notation, a dot placed over a vowel indicates that the vowel sound is produced closer to the center of the mouth.

Answer: True

A dot placed over a vowel in Americanist notation specifically indicates centering, signifying that the vowel sound is articulated closer to the central region of the oral cavity.

Related Concepts:

  • How are centering and fronting indicated for vowels in Americanist notation?: A dot placed over a vowel indicates centering, meaning the vowel sound is produced closer to the center of the mouth. Two dots, or a diaeresis, over a vowel are used to change its fronting, affecting whether the vowel is produced towards the front or back of the mouth.

The ogonek diacritic in Americanist notation is used to indicate a retracted consonant.

Answer: False

The ogonek diacritic in Americanist notation is used to indicate nasalization, particularly of vowels, not a retracted consonant.

Related Concepts:

  • Which diacritic is used for nasalization in Americanist notation?: The ogonek diacritic is used for nasalization in Americanist notation. This mark indicates that a vowel or consonant is produced with air flowing through the nose as well as the mouth.
  • What are the WIELD (2016) recommendations for representing diphthongs and nasal vowels?: WIELD (2016) recommends representing diphthongs, which are vowel sounds that involve a glide from one vowel quality to another, as, for example, <ai> or <ay>, depending on the phonological analysis. Nasal vowels are indicated with an ogonek, such as <ą>.

Pike (1947) indicates nasalization of vowels exclusively with a superscript 'n'.

Answer: False

Pike (1947) indicates nasalization of vowels with either a dot below the vowel (Ṿ) or a superscript 'n' (Vⁿ), not exclusively with the latter.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Pike (1947) conventions for nasalization and vowel length?: Pike (1947) indicates nasalization of vowels with either a dot below the vowel (Ṿ) or a superscript 'n' (Vⁿ). For vowel length, a long vowel is represented by Vː or Vˑ, and a half-long vowel by a raised dot (V·).

Pike (1947) uses a raised dot (V·) to represent a half-long vowel.

Answer: True

Pike (1947) indeed employs a raised dot (V·) as the convention for indicating a half-long vowel.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Pike (1947) conventions for nasalization and vowel length?: Pike (1947) indicates nasalization of vowels with either a dot below the vowel (Ṿ) or a superscript 'n' (Vⁿ). For vowel length, a long vowel is represented by Vː or Vˑ, and a half-long vowel by a raised dot (V·).

Bloch & Trager (1942) proposed a vowel schema that became widely adopted in American linguistics.

Answer: False

The vowel schema proposed by Bloch & Trager (1942), which used a single dot for central vowels and a diaeresis to reverse backness, was never widely adopted in the linguistic community.

Related Concepts:

  • Which vowel schema proposed by Bloch & Trager (1942) was never widely adopted?: Bloch & Trager (1942) proposed a vowel schema that was never used. This system utilized a single dot for central vowels and a diaeresis to reverse backness, but it did not gain traction in the linguistic community.

Which diacritic is used for nasalization in Americanist notation?

Answer: The ogonek diacritic

The ogonek diacritic is the primary mark used for indicating nasalization in Americanist phonetic notation.

Related Concepts:

  • Which diacritic is used for nasalization in Americanist notation?: The ogonek diacritic is used for nasalization in Americanist notation. This mark indicates that a vowel or consonant is produced with air flowing through the nose as well as the mouth.
  • What are the WIELD (2016) recommendations for representing diphthongs and nasal vowels?: WIELD (2016) recommends representing diphthongs, which are vowel sounds that involve a glide from one vowel quality to another, as, for example, <ai> or <ay>, depending on the phonological analysis. Nasal vowels are indicated with an ogonek, such as <ą>.

What does a dot placed over a vowel indicate in Americanist notation?

Answer: Centering

In Americanist notation, a dot placed over a vowel specifically denotes centering, indicating that the vowel is articulated closer to the center of the mouth.

Related Concepts:

  • How are centering and fronting indicated for vowels in Americanist notation?: A dot placed over a vowel indicates centering, meaning the vowel sound is produced closer to the center of the mouth. Two dots, or a diaeresis, over a vowel are used to change its fronting, affecting whether the vowel is produced towards the front or back of the mouth.

How does WIELD (2016) recommend representing nasal vowels?

Answer: With an ogonek

WIELD (2016) recommends the use of an ogonek diacritic, such as <ą>, to represent nasal vowels.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the WIELD (2016) recommendations for representing diphthongs and nasal vowels?: WIELD (2016) recommends representing diphthongs, which are vowel sounds that involve a glide from one vowel quality to another, as, for example, <ai> or <ay>, depending on the phonological analysis. Nasal vowels are indicated with an ogonek, such as <ą>.

What does Pike (1947) use to indicate a half-long vowel?

Answer: V·

Pike (1947) employs a raised dot (V·) as the specific symbol for indicating a half-long vowel.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Pike (1947) conventions for nasalization and vowel length?: Pike (1947) indicates nasalization of vowels with either a dot below the vowel (Ṿ) or a superscript 'n' (Vⁿ). For vowel length, a long vowel is represented by Vː or Vˑ, and a half-long vowel by a raised dot (V·).

Which vowel schema proposed by Bloch & Trager (1942) was never widely adopted?

Answer: A system using a single dot for central vowels and a diaeresis to reverse backness.

The vowel schema proposed by Bloch & Trager (1942), which featured a single dot for central vowels and a diaeresis for reversing backness, ultimately did not achieve widespread adoption.

Related Concepts:

  • Which vowel schema proposed by Bloch & Trager (1942) was never widely adopted?: Bloch & Trager (1942) proposed a vowel schema that was never used. This system utilized a single dot for central vowels and a diaeresis to reverse backness, but it did not gain traction in the linguistic community.

How are two dots, or a diaeresis, used over a vowel in Americanist notation?

Answer: To change its fronting

In Americanist notation, a diaeresis (two dots) placed over a vowel serves to modify its fronting, influencing whether the vowel is articulated towards the front or back of the mouth.

Related Concepts:

  • How are centering and fronting indicated for vowels in Americanist notation?: A dot placed over a vowel indicates centering, meaning the vowel sound is produced closer to the center of the mouth. Two dots, or a diaeresis, over a vowel are used to change its fronting, affecting whether the vowel is produced towards the front or back of the mouth.

According to Pike (1947), how is nasalization of vowels indicated using a superscript?

Answer: Vⁿ

Pike (1947) indicates nasalization of vowels using a superscript 'n' (Vⁿ) as one of the conventions.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Pike (1947) conventions for nasalization and vowel length?: Pike (1947) indicates nasalization of vowels with either a dot below the vowel (Ṿ) or a superscript 'n' (Vⁿ). For vowel length, a long vowel is represented by Vː or Vˑ, and a half-long vowel by a raised dot (V·).

What positional variant for vowels is marked with V̂ by Pike (1947)?

Answer: Fronted vowels

Pike (1947) uses the diacritic V̂ to specifically mark fronted vowels, indicating a forward shift in their articulation.

Related Concepts:

  • What positional variants for vowels are provided by Pike (1947)?: Pike (1947) provides symbols for several positional variants of vowels: fronted vowels are marked with V̂, backed vowels with V̌, raised vowels with V̝, and lowered vowels with V̞. These diacritics specify subtle shifts in vowel articulation.

Consonant Transcription: Articulation and Modification

WIELD's 2016 recommendations for NAPA consonants distinguish ejectives from other types of glottalization.

Answer: False

WIELD's 2016 recommendations for glottalization, while providing symbols like <č̓> or <m̓>, do not differentiate ejectives from other forms of glottalization.

Related Concepts:

  • How does WIELD's 2016 recommendation for glottalization differ from distinguishing ejectives?: WIELD's 2016 recommendations indicate glottalization with symbols like <č̓> or <m̓>, but they do not distinguish ejectives from other types of glottalization. Glottalization refers to the modification of a sound by the glottis, the opening between the vocal cords.
  • What organization provides recommendations for NAPA consonants since 2016?: The Western Institute for Endangered Language Documentation (WIELD) has recommended specific conventions for NAPA consonants since 2016. These recommendations are designed specifically for Native American languages, though NAPA is used more broadly.

In Americanist notation, the dental fricatives <θ ð> are considered sulcalized, while <s̮ z̮> are slit fricatives.

Answer: False

In Americanist notation, the dental fricatives <θ ð> are classified as slit fricatives, whereas <s̮ z̮> are considered sulcalized fricatives.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the distinction between dental fricatives <θ ð> and <s̮ z̮> in Americanist notation?: In Americanist notation, the dental fricatives <θ ð> are considered slit fricatives, meaning they are non-sibilant sounds produced with a narrow opening. In contrast, <s̮ z̮> are sulcalized, indicating they are sibilant sounds produced with a groove in the tongue.

Pullum & Ladusaw (1996) state that in Americanist notation, the ejective apostrophe is placed below the base letter, unlike IPA.

Answer: False

Pullum & Ladusaw (1996) note that in Americanist notation, the ejective apostrophe is placed *above* the base letter, consistent with IPA conventions for ejectives, but specifically above the letter.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the typical Americanist usage for ejectives and implosives, according to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996)?: According to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996), ejectives and implosives follow the same conventions as in the IPA, with the specific difference that the ejective apostrophe is placed above the base letter in Americanist notation. Ejectives are consonants produced with an egressive glottalic airstream, while implosives use an ingressive glottalic airstream.

Americanist notation typically uses digraphs for most coronal affricates, whereas the IPA generally uses single letters.

Answer: False

Americanist notation typically uses single letters for most coronal affricates, while the IPA generally employs digraphs for these sounds.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a key difference in how Americanist notation and IPA represent coronal affricates?: Americanist notation typically uses single letters for most coronal affricates, which are sounds produced by stopping airflow and then releasing it through a narrow opening. In contrast, the IPA generally requires digraphs, which are pairs of letters, to represent these same sounds.

In Americanist notation, an advancing diacritic (inverted breve) is used for retroflex and uvular sounds.

Answer: False

In Americanist notation, an advancing diacritic (inverted breve) is used for dental and palatal distinctions, while a retracting diacritic (a dot) is used for retroflex and uvular sounds.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Americanist notation use diacritics for dental, palatal, retroflex, and uvular distinctions?: Americanist notation uses an advancing diacritic (an inverted breve) for dentals and palatals, with the exception of non-sibilant dental <θ ð>. For retroflex and uvular sounds, it employs a retracting diacritic (a dot), except for the uvular <q>.

WIELD (2016) recommends representing geminate consonants only as <CC>.

Answer: False

WIELD (2016) recommends representing geminate consonants as either <Cː> or <CC>, not exclusively as <CC>.

Related Concepts:

  • How are geminate consonants represented in WIELD's 2016 recommendations?: In WIELD's 2016 recommendations, geminate consonants, which are sounds held for a longer duration than single consonants, are represented as either <Cː> or <CC>. Both notations indicate a lengthened consonant sound.

In Americanist notation, rhotic consonants are generally transcribed with the <r> character because most languages have multiple phonemic rhotic consonants.

Answer: False

Rhotic consonants in Americanist notation are generally transcribed with the <r> character because approximately 90% of languages possess only one phonemic rhotic consonant, simplifying transcription.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the general practice for transcribing rhotic consonants in Americanist notation, and what does this imply?: In Americanist notation, rhotic consonants are generally transcribed with the <r> character, as about 90% of languages have only one phonemic rhotic consonant. This economical practice means that a more careful reading of a given language's phonological description is required to determine the precise phonetics of the rhotic sound.

What is a key difference in how Americanist notation and IPA represent most coronal affricates?

Answer: Americanist notation uses single letters, while IPA generally requires digraphs.

A key distinction is that Americanist notation typically uses single letters for most coronal affricates, whereas the IPA generally employs digraphs for these sounds.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a key difference in how Americanist notation and IPA represent coronal affricates?: Americanist notation typically uses single letters for most coronal affricates, which are sounds produced by stopping airflow and then releasing it through a narrow opening. In contrast, the IPA generally requires digraphs, which are pairs of letters, to represent these same sounds.

In Americanist notation, which symbol represents the IPA's [j] sound?

Answer: <y>

In Americanist notation, the symbol <y> is used to represent the IPA's [j] sound.

Related Concepts:

  • Can you provide examples of specific symbols where NAPA differs significantly from the IPA?: Significant differences include <y> for the IPA's [j] sound, <ñ> for [ɲ], <c> or <¢> for [t͡s], <ƛ> for [t͡ɬ], and <ł> for [ɬ]. Additionally, NAPA uses palato-alveolar <č ǯ š ž> and sometimes alveopalatal <ć ś ź ń>.

Which organization provides recommendations for NAPA consonants specifically for Native American languages since 2016?

Answer: Western Institute for Endangered Language Documentation (WIELD)

The Western Institute for Endangered Language Documentation (WIELD) has been responsible for providing specific recommendations for NAPA consonants for Native American languages since 2016.

Related Concepts:

  • What organization provides recommendations for NAPA consonants since 2016?: The Western Institute for Endangered Language Documentation (WIELD) has recommended specific conventions for NAPA consonants since 2016. These recommendations are designed specifically for Native American languages, though NAPA is used more broadly.

How does WIELD's 2016 recommendation for glottalization differ regarding ejectives?

Answer: It does not distinguish ejectives from other types of glottalization.

WIELD's 2016 recommendations for glottalization, while providing symbols for glottalized sounds, do not make a specific distinction between ejectives and other forms of glottalization.

Related Concepts:

  • How does WIELD's 2016 recommendation for glottalization differ from distinguishing ejectives?: WIELD's 2016 recommendations indicate glottalization with symbols like <č̓> or <m̓>, but they do not distinguish ejectives from other types of glottalization. Glottalization refers to the modification of a sound by the glottis, the opening between the vocal cords.

In WIELD's 2016 recommendations, what does the diacritic <C̮> represent?

Answer: An advanced consonant

In WIELD's 2016 recommendations, the diacritic <C̮> is specifically used to represent an advanced consonant, indicating a forward shift in its articulation.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the WIELD (2016) recommendations for advanced and retracted consonants?: WIELD (2016) recommends <C̮> for an advanced consonant, meaning the articulation is moved forward in the mouth, and <C̣> for a retracted consonant, where the articulation is moved backward. These diacritics provide precise phonetic detail.

What is the general practice for transcribing rhotic consonants in Americanist notation?

Answer: Generally transcribing them with the <r> character.

The general practice in Americanist notation is to transcribe rhotic consonants using the <r> character, given that most languages typically feature only one phonemic rhotic.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the general practice for transcribing rhotic consonants in Americanist notation, and what does this imply?: In Americanist notation, rhotic consonants are generally transcribed with the <r> character, as about 90% of languages have only one phonemic rhotic consonant. This economical practice means that a more careful reading of a given language's phonological description is required to determine the precise phonetics of the rhotic sound.

In Americanist notation, what is the distinction between dental fricatives <θ ð> and <s̮ z̮>?

Answer: <θ ð> are slit fricatives, while <s̮ z̮> are sulcalized.

In Americanist notation, <θ ð> are distinguished as slit fricatives, characterized by a narrow, non-sibilant opening, whereas <s̮ z̮> are sulcalized, indicating sibilant production with a grooved tongue.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the distinction between dental fricatives <θ ð> and <s̮ z̮> in Americanist notation?: In Americanist notation, the dental fricatives <θ ð> are considered slit fricatives, meaning they are non-sibilant sounds produced with a narrow opening. In contrast, <s̮ z̮> are sulcalized, indicating they are sibilant sounds produced with a groove in the tongue.

According to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996), how does Americanist notation typically represent the ejective apostrophe compared to the IPA?

Answer: It is placed above the base letter.

Pullum & Ladusaw (1996) specify that in Americanist notation, the ejective apostrophe is conventionally placed above the base letter, aligning with IPA conventions but with this specific placement.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the typical Americanist usage for ejectives and implosives, according to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996)?: According to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996), ejectives and implosives follow the same conventions as in the IPA, with the specific difference that the ejective apostrophe is placed above the base letter in Americanist notation. Ejectives are consonants produced with an egressive glottalic airstream, while implosives use an ingressive glottalic airstream.

What type of diacritic does Americanist notation use for dental and palatal distinctions, excluding non-sibilant dental fricatives?

Answer: An advancing diacritic (inverted breve)

Americanist notation employs an advancing diacritic, specifically an inverted breve, for dental and palatal distinctions, with the exception of non-sibilant dental fricatives.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Americanist notation use diacritics for dental, palatal, retroflex, and uvular distinctions?: Americanist notation uses an advancing diacritic (an inverted breve) for dentals and palatals, with the exception of non-sibilant dental <θ ð>. For retroflex and uvular sounds, it employs a retracting diacritic (a dot), except for the uvular <q>.

In WIELD's 2016 recommendations, how are geminate consonants represented?

Answer: As either <Cː> or <CC>

WIELD's 2016 recommendations permit the representation of geminate consonants using either a colon-like symbol (<Cː>) or by doubling the consonant letter (<CC>).

Related Concepts:

  • How are geminate consonants represented in WIELD's 2016 recommendations?: In WIELD's 2016 recommendations, geminate consonants, which are sounds held for a longer duration than single consonants, are represented as either <Cː> or <CC>. Both notations indicate a lengthened consonant sound.

What symbols does Americanist notation use for a flap sound?

Answer: <r> or <ř>

Americanist notation represents a flap sound using either the symbol <r> or <ř>.

Related Concepts:

  • What symbols does Americanist notation use for a flap and a trill?: In Americanist notation, a flap sound is represented by <r> or <ř>, while a trill sound is indicated by <r̃>. These symbols denote specific types of rhotic consonants.

What are the WIELD (2016) recommendations for a retracted consonant?

Answer: <C̣>

WIELD's 2016 recommendations specify <C̣> as the diacritic for a retracted consonant, indicating a backward shift in articulation.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the WIELD (2016) recommendations for advanced and retracted consonants?: WIELD (2016) recommends <C̮> for an advanced consonant, meaning the articulation is moved forward in the mouth, and <C̣> for a retracted consonant, where the articulation is moved backward. These diacritics provide precise phonetic detail.

What does the general practice of transcribing rhotic consonants with <r> in Americanist notation imply?

Answer: That a careful reading of a language's phonological description is needed for precise phonetics.

The practice of transcribing most rhotic consonants with <r> in Americanist notation necessitates a careful consultation of a language's specific phonological description to ascertain the precise phonetic realization of the rhotic sound.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the general practice for transcribing rhotic consonants in Americanist notation, and what does this imply?: In Americanist notation, rhotic consonants are generally transcribed with the <r> character, as about 90% of languages have only one phonemic rhotic consonant. This economical practice means that a more careful reading of a given language's phonological description is required to determine the precise phonetics of the rhotic sound.

Prosodic Features and Boundary Marking

In Pike (1947) notation, a single vertical bar <|> marks a long or final pause.

Answer: False

In Pike (1947) notation, a single vertical bar <|> marks a short or intermediate pause, while a double vertical bar <||> indicates a long or final pause.

Related Concepts:

  • How are short, intermediate, and long or final pauses marked in Pike (1947) notation?: In Pike (1947) notation, short or intermediate pauses are marked with a single vertical bar <|>, while long or final pauses are indicated by a double vertical bar <||>, similar to IPA conventions. These symbols denote breaks in speech flow.

Acute and grave accents are placed over vowels in Americanist notation to indicate stress.

Answer: True

Acute and grave accents are indeed used in Americanist notation, placed over vowels, to signify primary and secondary stress, respectively.

Related Concepts:

  • What accents are used to denote stress over vowels in Americanist notation?: Acute and grave accents are placed over vowels to indicate stress in Americanist notation. An acute accent typically marks primary stress, while a grave accent often denotes secondary stress.

In Pike (1947) notation, primary stress is indicated by ˈCV or V́.

Answer: True

Pike (1947) notation specifies that primary stress is indicated by either ˈCV or V́.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Pike (1947) indicate primary and secondary stress?: Pike (1947) indicates primary stress with <ˈCV> or <V́>, and secondary stress with <ˌCV> or <V̀>. Stress refers to the emphasis placed on certain syllables within a word.

In Pike (1947) notation, how is a Low tone indicated?

Answer: V̀ or V⁴

Pike (1947) notation specifies that a Low tone is indicated by either V̀ or V⁴.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Pike (1947) tone marks for high, mid, norm, and low tones?: Pike (1947) provides specific tone marks: High tone is indicated by <V́> or <V¹>, Mid tone by <V̄> or <V²>, Norm tone by <V̅> or <V³>, and Low tone by <V̀> or <V⁴>. These marks help represent the pitch contours of spoken language.

How does Pike (1947) indicate secondary stress?

Answer: ˌCV or V̀

Pike (1947) indicates secondary stress using the symbols ˌCV or V̀.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Pike (1947) indicate primary and secondary stress?: Pike (1947) indicates primary stress with <ˈCV> or <V́>, and secondary stress with <ˌCV> or <V̀>. Stress refers to the emphasis placed on certain syllables within a word.

In Pike (1947) notation, what does a double vertical bar <||> signify?

Answer: A long or final pause

In Pike (1947) notation, a double vertical bar <||> is used to signify a long or final pause in speech.

Related Concepts:

  • How are short, intermediate, and long or final pauses marked in Pike (1947) notation?: In Pike (1947) notation, short or intermediate pauses are marked with a single vertical bar <|>, while long or final pauses are indicated by a double vertical bar <||>, similar to IPA conventions. These symbols denote breaks in speech flow.

According to Pike (1947), what symbol is used for a Mid tone?

Answer: V̄ or V²

Pike (1947) designates V̄ or V² as the symbols used to indicate a Mid tone.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Pike (1947) tone marks for high, mid, norm, and low tones?: Pike (1947) provides specific tone marks: High tone is indicated by <V́> or <V¹>, Mid tone by <V̄> or <V²>, Norm tone by <V̅> or <V³>, and Low tone by <V̀> or <V⁴>. These marks help represent the pitch contours of spoken language.

In Pike (1947) notation, how are morpheme boundaries indicated?

Answer: With a hyphen (CV-CV)

Pike (1947) notation uses a hyphen (CV-CV) to clearly delineate morpheme boundaries within a word.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the convention for syllable division and morpheme boundaries in Pike (1947) notation?: In Pike (1947) notation, syllable division is indicated by a period, as in CV.CV, similar to IPA. Morpheme boundaries, which mark the divisions between meaningful units in a word, are shown with a hyphen, as in CV-CV.

What type of accent typically marks primary stress over vowels in Americanist notation?

Answer: Acute accent

In Americanist notation, an acute accent is typically placed over vowels to indicate primary stress.

Related Concepts:

  • What accents are used to denote stress over vowels in Americanist notation?: Acute and grave accents are placed over vowels to indicate stress in Americanist notation. An acute accent typically marks primary stress, while a grave accent often denotes secondary stress.

In Pike (1947) notation, how are short or intermediate pauses marked?

Answer: A single vertical bar <|>

Pike (1947) notation employs a single vertical bar <|> to indicate short or intermediate pauses in speech.

Related Concepts:

  • How are short, intermediate, and long or final pauses marked in Pike (1947) notation?: In Pike (1947) notation, short or intermediate pauses are marked with a single vertical bar <|>, while long or final pauses are indicated by a double vertical bar <||>, similar to IPA conventions. These symbols denote breaks in speech flow.

Contemporary Usage and Linguistic Debates

Americanist phonetic notation is exclusively used for transcribing indigenous languages of the Americas.

Answer: False

Americanist phonetic notation, while developed for indigenous languages of the Americas, is also commonly used by linguists working on Slavic, Uralic, Semitic, Caucasian, Indian, and African languages.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond the Americas, where is Americanist phonetic notation still commonly used by linguists?: Despite its name, Americanist phonetic notation is still commonly used by linguists working on Slavic, Uralic, and Semitic languages, as well as languages of the Caucasus, India, and much of Africa. This demonstrates its broad applicability in linguistic research.
  • Who originally developed Americanist phonetic notation and for what purpose?: This notation system was originally developed by European and American anthropologists and language scientists, many of whom were Neogrammarians. Its primary purpose was the phonetic and phonemic transcription of indigenous languages of the Americas, as well as languages of Europe.

According to Carl Voegelin, Edward Sapir strongly preferred Americanist conventions over IPA symbols for transcribing American Indian languages.

Answer: True

Carl Voegelin's anecdote illustrates Edward Sapir's strong preference for Americanist conventions, as Sapir insisted on the use of 's wedge' (š) over the IPA symbol for the 'sh' sound in American Indian language transcription.

Related Concepts:

  • What anecdote did Carl Voegelin share about Edward Sapir's reaction to IPA notation?: Carl Voegelin recounted that when he used IPA symbols in his work on an American Indian language for Edward Sapir in the early 1930s, Sapir 'simply blew up' and demanded that Voegelin use 's wedge' (š) instead of the IPA symbol for the 'sh' sound in 'ship'. This illustrates a strong preference for Americanist conventions.

The IETF language tag subtag fonnapa is used to identify text written in Americanist phonetic notation.

Answer: True

The IETF language tags officially register fonnapa as the subtag specifically for text encoded using Americanist phonetic notation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the IETF language tag subtag for Americanist phonetic notation?: The IETF language tags register fonnapa as a subtag for text written in Americanist phonetic notation. This tag helps in identifying and processing linguistic data encoded using this specific system.

Uralicists commonly use a specialized variant of Americanist phonetic notation known as the Uralic Phonetic Alphabet.

Answer: True

Uralicists indeed utilize a specialized variant of Americanist phonetic notation, specifically termed the Uralic Phonetic Alphabet, for their linguistic work.

Related Concepts:

  • Is there a specific variant of Americanist phonetic notation used by Uralicists?: Yes, Uralicists commonly use a variant of Americanist phonetic notation known as the Uralic Phonetic Alphabet. This indicates a specialized adaptation of the system for a particular language family.

The journals *American Anthropologist* and *Language* are known to feature Americanist notation.

Answer: True

The journals *American Anthropologist*, *International Journal of American Linguistics*, and *Language* are recognized venues where Americanist notation is commonly featured in linguistic research.

Related Concepts:

  • Which journals commonly feature Americanist notation?: Americanist notation may be seen in the journals *American Anthropologist*, *International Journal of American Linguistics*, and *Language*. These publications serve as key outlets for linguistic research utilizing this system.

Abercrombie suggested that hostility towards IPA notation in America was partly due to a desire by linguists to avoid association with prescriptive Speech Departments.

Answer: True

Abercrombie posited that some American linguists harbored hostility towards IPA notation due to a desire to distance themselves from the perceived prescriptive nature of university Speech Departments.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Abercrombie, what was a suggested reason for the hostility towards IPA notation in America?: Abercrombie suggested that the hostility stemmed from the existence of well-endowed and powerful Speech Departments in American universities, which were perceived as predominantly prescriptive and less scholarly by some in Linguistics Departments. Using IPA notation might lead a linguist to be mistaken for a member of a Speech Department, which was undesirable.

Beyond the Americas, in which language family is Americanist phonetic notation still commonly used by linguists?

Answer: Uralic languages

Americanist phonetic notation remains commonly used by linguists working on Uralic languages, among others, demonstrating its broader application beyond the Americas.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond the Americas, where is Americanist phonetic notation still commonly used by linguists?: Despite its name, Americanist phonetic notation is still commonly used by linguists working on Slavic, Uralic, and Semitic languages, as well as languages of the Caucasus, India, and much of Africa. This demonstrates its broad applicability in linguistic research.
  • Is there a specific variant of Americanist phonetic notation used by Uralicists?: Yes, Uralicists commonly use a variant of Americanist phonetic notation known as the Uralic Phonetic Alphabet. This indicates a specialized adaptation of the system for a particular language family.

According to Abercrombie, what was a suggested reason for hostility towards IPA notation in America among some linguists?

Answer: Using IPA might lead a linguist to be mistaken for a member of a prescriptive Speech Department.

Abercrombie suggested that hostility towards IPA notation in America stemmed from a concern among linguists that using IPA symbols might lead to an undesirable association with prescriptive Speech Departments in universities.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Abercrombie, what was a suggested reason for the hostility towards IPA notation in America?: Abercrombie suggested that the hostility stemmed from the existence of well-endowed and powerful Speech Departments in American universities, which were perceived as predominantly prescriptive and less scholarly by some in Linguistics Departments. Using IPA notation might lead a linguist to be mistaken for a member of a Speech Department, which was undesirable.

What is the IETF language tag subtag for text written in Americanist phonetic notation?

Answer: fonnapa

The IETF language tag subtag fonnapa is the designated identifier for text written using Americanist phonetic notation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the IETF language tag subtag for Americanist phonetic notation?: The IETF language tags register fonnapa as a subtag for text written in Americanist phonetic notation. This tag helps in identifying and processing linguistic data encoded using this specific system.

Which of the following journals commonly features Americanist notation?

Answer: *International Journal of American Linguistics*

The *International Journal of American Linguistics* is one of the prominent academic journals known for featuring research that employs Americanist phonetic notation.

Related Concepts:

  • Which journals commonly feature Americanist notation?: Americanist notation may be seen in the journals *American Anthropologist*, *International Journal of American Linguistics*, and *Language*. These publications serve as key outlets for linguistic research utilizing this system.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy