Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
The term 'arable land' is derived from the Latin word 'arabilis,' which signifies 'suitable for planting'.
Answer: False
The etymological origin of 'arable land' is the Latin word 'arabilis,' which specifically denotes 'able to be ploughed,' not merely 'suitable for planting.'
The general definition of arable land posits it as land capable of being ploughed and subsequently utilized for crop cultivation.
Answer: True
This statement aligns with the established definition, which characterizes arable land as land possessing the capability for ploughing and subsequent utilization for crop growth.
According to the FAO, land left fallow for more than five years is considered arable land for statistical purposes.
Answer: False
The FAO's statistical definition of arable land excludes land left fallow for more than five years; it must be under temporary crops, temporary meadows, or fallowed for less than five years.
Eurostat defines arable land primarily based on its regular working through methods like ploughing or tilling, often within a crop rotation system.
Answer: True
Eurostat's definition emphasizes the regular cultivation of land through methods such as ploughing or tilling, typically integrated within a crop rotation framework.
In traditional British classification, arable land was synonymous with pasturable land like heaths.
Answer: False
Within traditional British land classification systems, arable land was distinguished from pasturable land; arable land was designated for crop cultivation, whereas pasturable land, like heaths, was primarily used for grazing.
Meadows and pastures used for grazing are classified as arable land.
Answer: False
Meadows and pastures primarily used for grazing are generally classified as agricultural land but not arable land, which is specifically designated for crop cultivation.
Insufficient freshwater is a common limitation that renders land non-arable.
Answer: True
Lack of sufficient freshwater for irrigation is a primary environmental constraint that can render land unsuitable for cultivation, thus classifying it as non-arable.
Non-arable land, such as rangelands, cannot possess agricultural value.
Answer: False
Non-arable land, including rangelands, can retain significant agricultural value, particularly for livestock grazing, even if it is unsuitable for crop production.
What is the precise etymological meaning of the Latin term 'arabilis,' the root of 'arable land'?
Answer: Able to be ploughed
The Latin word 'arabilis' directly translates to 'able to be ploughed,' underscoring the fundamental characteristic of land suitable for cultivation.
Which of the following best describes the general definition of arable land?
Answer: Land capable of being ploughed and used for crop cultivation.
The general definition of arable land emphasizes its capacity for ploughing and subsequent utilization for growing crops.
According to the FAO's statistical definition, which type of land is included as arable land?
Answer: Temporary meadows intended for mowing or pasture.
The FAO's statistical definition of arable land includes temporary meadows designated for mowing or pasture, alongside land under temporary crops and land fallowed for less than five years.
What distinguishes the Eurostat definition of arable land from the general definition?
Answer: Eurostat emphasizes regular working and crop rotation.
Eurostat's definition specifically highlights the regular cultivation through ploughing or tilling, often within a crop rotation system, as a key characteristic of arable land.
How did traditional British land classification differentiate arable land from other types of land, such as heaths?
Answer: Arable land was specifically for crop cultivation, distinct from pasturable land.
Traditionally, arable land was designated for crop cultivation, differentiating it from pasturable land like heaths, which were primarily utilized for livestock grazing.
Which of the following is typically classified as agricultural land but NOT arable land?
Answer: Permanent pastures used for grazing
Permanent pastures, primarily used for grazing livestock, are considered agricultural land but are typically excluded from the definition of arable land, which is reserved for crop cultivation.
What is a common limitation that makes land non-arable?
Answer: Presence of stones or steep topography
Physical constraints such as the presence of stones, steep topography, or excessive wetness are common factors that render land non-arable.
In 2013, the total global arable land was approximately 1.407 billion hectares, according to the FAO.
Answer: True
According to data from the FAO, the global extent of arable land in 2013 was approximately 1.407 billion hectares.
The 1.407 billion hectares of arable land reported globally in 2013 represented the majority of the total land used for agriculture worldwide.
Answer: False
In 2013, the 1.407 billion hectares of arable land represented a portion, not the majority, of the total 4.924 billion hectares used for agriculture globally.
In 2019, China possessed the largest area of arable land globally.
Answer: False
Data from 2019 indicates that the United States held the largest area of arable land globally, followed closely by India, with China ranking fourth.
India's arable land area in 2019 was slightly less than that of the United States.
Answer: True
In 2019, India's arable land area was recorded at 156,067 thousand hectares, which was marginally less than the United States' figure of 157,737 thousand hectares for the same year.
The top five countries for arable land area in 2019 included Brazil but not Russia.
Answer: False
The top five countries for arable land area in 2019 included both Brazil and Russia. The list comprised the United States, India, Russia, China, and Brazil.
Australia had the highest amount of arable land per person in 2013 among the countries listed.
Answer: True
Based on the 2013 data presented for arable land per person, Australia recorded the highest amount at 1.999 hectares per person among the listed nations.
In 2013, Canada had significantly more arable land per person than Kazakhstan.
Answer: False
In 2013, Kazakhstan had 1.726 hectares of arable land per person, while Canada had 1.306 hectares per person, indicating Kazakhstan had more.
Countries like Singapore and Hong Kong reported zero hectares of arable land per person in 2013.
Answer: True
Several countries, including Singapore and Hong Kong, reported negligible or zero hectares of arable land per person in 2013 due to their high population density and limited land resources.
What was the approximate total area of arable land globally in 2013, according to the FAO?
Answer: 1.407 billion hectares
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported the global arable land area in 2013 to be approximately 1.407 billion hectares.
How did the total global arable land in 2013 compare to the total land used for agriculture?
Answer: Arable land was a smaller portion of the total agricultural land.
The 1.407 billion hectares of arable land in 2013 represented a fraction of the total 4.924 billion hectares utilized for agriculture worldwide during that year.
Which country held the largest area of arable land in 2019?
Answer: United States
In 2019, the United States possessed the largest area of arable land globally, with 157,737 thousand hectares.
In 2019, India's arable land area was approximately how much, and how did it rank globally?
Answer: 156,067 thousand hectares, ranking second.
India's arable land area in 2019 was approximately 156,067 thousand hectares, positioning it as the second-largest globally for that metric.
Which of the following countries was NOT among the top five globally for arable land area in 2019?
Answer: Canada
The top five countries for arable land area in 2019 were the United States, India, Russia, China, and Brazil. Canada was not among this group.
Which country recorded the highest amount of arable land per person in 2013?
Answer: Australia
In 2013, Australia recorded the highest amount of arable land per person among the listed countries, with 1.999 hectares per person.
What was the per capita arable land availability in Canada in 2013?
Answer: 1.306 hectares
In 2013, Canada had 1.306 hectares of arable land available per person.
Which of these countries reported extremely low levels of arable land per person in 2013?
Answer: Bahrain
Countries such as Bahrain, Singapore, and Hong Kong reported extremely low levels of arable land per person in 2013 due to their limited land area and high population density.
Arable land is vulnerable to land degradation, climate change, and biodiversity loss.
Answer: True
Arable land faces significant vulnerabilities, including susceptibility to land degradation, the impacts of climate change, and the loss of biodiversity, all of which can compromise its productivity.
Which of the following is identified as a major vulnerability for arable land?
Answer: Land degradation
Land degradation is a primary vulnerability that diminishes the health and productivity of arable land, alongside threats from climate change and biodiversity loss.
It is impossible to convert non-arable land into arable land.
Answer: False
Certain types of non-arable land can indeed be rendered arable through various improvement techniques, rendering the assertion of impossibility incorrect.
Converting non-arable land to arable land can potentially help alleviate starvation and increase national self-sufficiency.
Answer: True
The transformation of non-arable land into arable land can enhance food production capacity, thereby contributing to the alleviation of starvation and bolstering national food self-sufficiency.
A significant drawback of converting non-arable land is that the artificial modifications do not change the land's fundamental nature and can lead to environmental issues.
Answer: True
Artificial modifications for land conversion may not alter the land's inherent characteristics and can result in environmental consequences, such as pollution from excessive fertilizer use.
The use of seaweed and sand to grow crops on rocky terrain in the Aran Islands is an example of land degradation.
Answer: False
The cultivation on rocky terrain in the Aran Islands using seaweed and sand is an example of successful land management and adaptation, not land degradation.
What is a potential benefit of converting non-arable land into arable land?
Answer: Enhanced national self-sufficiency in food production
Converting non-arable land to arable land can significantly increase domestic food production, thereby enhancing national self-sufficiency and reducing dependence on food imports.
What is a significant drawback associated with converting non-arable land into arable land using artificial methods?
Answer: Artificial modifications may not alter the land's fundamental nature and can cause pollution.
Artificial interventions in converting non-arable land may not fundamentally change its nature and can lead to environmental issues, including pollution from excessive chemical inputs.
Which technology is mentioned as a way to use solar energy for desalination in converting non-arable land?
Answer: Seawater greenhouses
Seawater greenhouses are cited as a technology that utilizes solar energy for desalination, enabling the cultivation of crops in arid or non-arable regions.
Land degradation refers to the improvement of land's health and productivity over time.
Answer: False
Land degradation is defined as a decline in the health and productivity of land, not an improvement.
Human actions, particularly unsustainable land management, are considered the main drivers of land degradation.
Answer: True
Unsustainable land management practices are widely recognized as the primary anthropogenic drivers of land degradation globally.
Land degradation can lead to improved water storage and filtration capabilities in the soil.
Answer: False
Land degradation typically impairs the soil's capacity for water storage and filtration, often exacerbating water scarcity and quality issues.
Approximately 30% of the world's land is estimated to be degraded.
Answer: True
Current estimates indicate that approximately 30% of the global land area is affected by degradation.
The global economy was projected to gain up to $23 trillion by 2050 due to land degradation.
Answer: False
Projections indicate that land degradation could result in substantial global economic losses, estimated to be up to $23 trillion by 2050, rather than gains.
Soil salinization, caused by improper irrigation, can lead to the migration of salts to the soil surface, harming crop productivity.
Answer: True
Improper irrigation practices can indeed cause soil salinization by facilitating the upward movement of salts, which accumulate at the surface and impede crop growth.
The image of cattle is used to illustrate overgrazing as a factor contributing to land degradation.
Answer: True
The visual representation of cattle is employed to exemplify overgrazing as a significant contributing factor to land degradation, leading to soil erosion and reduced vegetation cover.
What is the primary cause of land degradation, according to the source?
Answer: Unsustainable land management practices
The source identifies unsustainable land management practices as the principal drivers of land degradation, surpassing natural processes or sudden climatic events.
Which of the following is a significant consequence of land degradation?
Answer: Reduced agricultural productivity
A primary consequence of land degradation is the diminished capacity of the land to support agriculture, leading to reduced crop yields and overall productivity.
What percentage of the world's land is estimated to be degraded?
Answer: Approximately 30%
Current estimates indicate that approximately 30% of the global land area is affected by degradation.
What economic impact was projected for the year 2050 due to land degradation?
Answer: Global economic losses of up to $23 trillion
Projections suggest that land degradation could lead to substantial global economic losses, potentially reaching up to $23 trillion by the year 2050.
How does improper irrigation contribute to land degradation?
Answer: By causing salts to migrate upwards, concentrating in the root zone.
Improper irrigation can lead to soil salinization, where salts accumulate in the root zone due to upward migration, thereby degrading the land's productivity.
The image from East Riding of Yorkshire, England, depicts mechanized agriculture focused on crop cultivation.
Answer: False
The image originating from East Riding of Yorkshire, England, illustrates a pasture used for grazing animals, not mechanized agriculture focused on crop cultivation.
The image of mechanized agriculture in Dorset, England, primarily illustrates:
Answer: Efficient cultivation of large fields using modern machinery.
The depiction of mechanized agriculture in Dorset, England, showcases the efficiency and scale achievable in cultivating large fields using contemporary machinery.
What agricultural practice is shown in the image featuring water buffalo in Indonesia?
Answer: Traditional agricultural methods involving animal power.
The image of water buffalo in Indonesia illustrates traditional agricultural methods, specifically the use of animal power for ploughing rice fields.
The image from East Riding of Yorkshire, England, depicts which type of land use?
Answer: A pasture used for grazing
The image from East Riding of Yorkshire, England, depicts a pasture, indicating land primarily utilized for grazing animals rather than crop cultivation.