Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
The Battle of Helsingborg was a naval engagement fought in 1362, marking a key event in the Danish-Hanseatic War which concluded in 1370.
Answer: False
While the Danish-Hanseatic War is described as spanning from 1361 to 1370, the provided source explicitly states that it officially concluded with the signing of the peace treaty of Vordingborg on November 22, 1365.
The Danish-Hanseatic War was a brief conflict lasting only a few months in 1362.
Answer: False
The Danish-Hanseatic War spanned from 1361 to 1370, officially concluding in 1365, indicating it was a prolonged conflict, not a brief one lasting only a few months.
The Danish-Hanseatic War was primarily caused by religious differences between the warring parties.
Answer: False
The Danish-Hanseatic War was primarily caused by ongoing trading and territorial disputes, not religious differences.
The Danish-Hanseatic War concluded with the signing of the peace treaty of Vordingborg on November 22, 1365.
Answer: True
The Danish-Hanseatic War officially concluded on November 22, 1365, with the signing of the peace treaty of Vordingborg.
The peace treaty of Vordingborg was signed in 1370, marking the end of the Danish-Hanseatic War.
Answer: False
The peace treaty of Vordingborg was signed on November 22, 1365, officially concluding the Danish-Hanseatic War, not in 1370.
Lübeck was a Free City and a significant member of the Hanseatic League during this period.
Answer: True
Lübeck was a Free City and a prominent, influential member of the Hanseatic League, playing a significant role in its military and economic endeavors.
The Hanseatic League's main motivation for conflict with Denmark was to expand its territorial control into Scandinavia.
Answer: False
The primary motivation for the Hanseatic League's conflict with Denmark stemmed from ongoing trading and territorial disputes, not solely to expand territorial control into Scandinavia.
The Battle of Helsingborg was a key event within which larger conflict?
Answer: The Danish-Hanseatic War
The Battle of Helsingborg was a key event within the Danish-Hanseatic War, a conflict that lasted from 1361 to 1370.
What was the broader context that led to the Danish-Hanseatic War?
Answer: Ongoing trading and territorial disputes
The Danish-Hanseatic War arose from ongoing trading and territorial disputes among the Hanseatic League, Sweden, and Denmark.
When and how did the Danish-Hanseatic War conclude?
Answer: November 22, 1365, with the peace treaty of Vordingborg
The Danish-Hanseatic War officially concluded on November 22, 1365, with the signing of the peace treaty of Vordingborg.
What was the purpose of the peace treaty of Vordingborg?
Answer: To bring an official end to the Danish-Hanseatic War.
The peace treaty of Vordingborg, signed on November 22, 1365, served to formally conclude the Danish-Hanseatic War (1361-1370).
What was the political status of Lübeck during this period?
Answer: A Free City and prominent member of the Hanseatic League
Lübeck was a Free City, signifying its self-governing autonomy within the Holy Roman Empire, and a prominent and influential member of the Hanseatic League.
What was the primary motivation for the Hanseatic League to engage in conflict with Denmark?
Answer: Ongoing trading and territorial disputes
The primary motivation for the Hanseatic League's conflict with Denmark stemmed from persistent trading and territorial disputes, as both entities sought to control lucrative trade routes and exert influence within the Baltic Sea region.
Prior to the battle, the Hanseatic cities allied with Sweden and Holstein to launch a joint attack on Denmark.
Answer: True
Before the battle, the Hanseatic cities formed an agreement with Sweden and Holstein to launch a joint attack on Denmark.
Johann Wittenborg's initial objective was to attack Helsingborg directly, bypassing Copenhagen.
Answer: False
Wittenborg's fleet initially intended to attack Copenhagen, but he was later persuaded to alter his course and attack Helsingborg instead.
Wittenborg changed his fleet's target from Copenhagen to Helsingborg due to a direct order from King Magnus Eriksson of Sweden.
Answer: False
Wittenborg was persuaded to alter his course and attack Helsingborg, but the source does not state this was a direct order from King Magnus Eriksson.
Upon arriving at Helsingborg, Johann Wittenborg immediately engaged the Danish fleet in a naval battle.
Answer: False
Upon arriving at Helsingborg, Johann Wittenborg disembarked his men and initiated a siege against the town's stronghold, rather than immediately engaging in a naval battle.
Holstein was an ally of Denmark during the Danish-Hanseatic War.
Answer: False
Holstein was an ally of the Hanseatic cities and Sweden, forming an agreement to jointly attack Denmark.
The siege of Helsingborg by Hanseatic forces lasted for several weeks before the Danish naval counter-attack.
Answer: True
The Hanseatic forces besieged the stronghold of Helsingborg for several weeks before Valdemar Atterdag launched his surprise naval attack.
Which entities formed an agreement with the Hanseatic cities to launch a joint attack on Denmark prior to the battle?
Answer: Sweden and Holstein
The Hanseatic cities formed an agreement with Sweden and Holstein to launch a joint attack on Denmark.
How many ships did King Magnus Eriksson of Sweden contribute funds for to the Hanseatic fleet?
Answer: Five
King Magnus Eriksson of Sweden contributed funds for five of the 50 ships that made up the Hanseatic attack force.
What was Wittenborg's fleet's initial objective as it sailed through the Øresund?
Answer: To attack Copenhagen
Wittenborg's fleet initially intended to sail through the Øresund strait to attack Copenhagen.
Why did Johann Wittenborg's fleet change its initial target from Copenhagen to Helsingborg?
Answer: He was persuaded to alter his course and attack Helsingborg.
As Wittenborg's fleet passed through the Øresund, he was persuaded to alter his course and attack Helsingborg and its fortified citadel instead of proceeding directly to Copenhagen.
What action did Wittenborg take upon arriving at Helsingborg?
Answer: He disembarked his men and initiated a siege against the town's stronghold.
Upon arriving at Helsingborg, Johann Wittenborg disembarked his fighting men and initiated a siege against the town's stronghold.
What was the role of Holstein in the alliance against Denmark?
Answer: It made an agreement with the Hanseatic cities and Sweden to jointly attack Denmark.
Holstein was one of the entities that made an agreement with the Hanseatic cities and Sweden to jointly attack Denmark.
How long did the siege of Helsingborg last before the naval battle occurred?
Answer: Several weeks
The Hanseatic forces under Johann Wittenborg besieged the stronghold of Helsingborg for several weeks before Valdemar Atterdag launched his surprise naval attack.
The Battle of Helsingborg was primarily a land-based conflict, with minimal naval involvement.
Answer: False
The Battle of Helsingborg is explicitly described as a significant naval engagement, not a primarily land-based conflict.
The Hanseatic League achieved a decisive victory over the Danish forces at Helsingborg.
Answer: False
The Battle of Helsingborg resulted in a decisive Danish victory, not a Hanseatic one.
The primary belligerents in the Battle of Helsingborg were Medieval Denmark and the Hanseatic League, with Lübeck playing a key role.
Answer: True
The primary belligerents were Medieval Denmark and the Hanseatic League, with the Free City of Lübeck being a prominent and influential member of the Hanseatic League.
The Danish fleet was significantly smaller than the Hanseatic fleet, carrying only 1,000 men.
Answer: False
The Danish fleet was capable of carrying 2,500 men, while the Hanseatic forces consisted of 3,000 men, indicating the Danish fleet was not significantly smaller in troop capacity and certainly not 'only 1,000 men'.
The Hanseatic League's forces included 50 ships and approximately 3,000 men, with some funding from the King of Sweden.
Answer: True
The Hanseatic League's forces comprised 50 ships and approximately 3,000 men, with King Magnus Eriksson of Sweden funding five of these ships.
Valdemar Atterdag responded to the Hanseatic siege by launching a surprise naval attack on their fleet.
Answer: True
While Wittenborg's forces were besieging Helsingborg, Valdemar Atterdag assembled his fleet and launched a surprise attack on the Hanseatic Fleet.
The Danish victory was largely due to the Hanseatic fleet being left vulnerable while most of their soldiers were besieging Helsingborg.
Answer: True
The Danish achieved victory primarily because the majority of Wittenborg's soldiers were engaged in the siege within Helsingborg, leaving the Hanseatic fleet vulnerable to a surprise naval assault.
The Hanseatic League's defeat at Helsingborg was primarily due to a lack of naval experience among its commanders.
Answer: False
The Hanseatic League's defeat was primarily due to their commander diverting the main fighting force to besiege the town, leaving the fleet vulnerable, not a lack of naval experience.
The Battle of Helsingborg occurred on July 8, 1362, a date that is significant for marking the beginning of the Danish-Hanseatic War.
Answer: False
July 8, 1362, marks the precise date of the Battle of Helsingborg, but the Danish-Hanseatic War began in 1361, not 1362.
When did the Battle of Helsingborg take place?
Answer: July 8, 1362
The Battle of Helsingborg was fought on July 8, 1362.
What was the outcome of the Battle of Helsingborg?
Answer: A decisive Danish victory
The Battle of Helsingborg resulted in a decisive Danish victory over the Hanseatic forces.
Which two parties were the primary belligerents in the Battle of Helsingborg?
Answer: Medieval Denmark and the Hanseatic League
The primary belligerents in the Battle of Helsingborg were Medieval Denmark and the Hanseatic League.
What was the approximate troop capacity of the Danish fleet?
Answer: 2,500 men
The Danish fleet was composed of ships capable of carrying an army of 2,500 men.
How many ships did the Hanseatic League's forces consist of in the battle?
Answer: 50 ships
The Hanseatic League's forces consisted of 50 ships and approximately 3,000 men.
How did Valdemar Atterdag respond to the Hanseatic siege of Helsingborg?
Answer: He assembled his own fleet and launched a surprise attack on the Hanseatic Fleet.
While Wittenborg's forces were engaged in besieging Helsingborg, Valdemar Atterdag swiftly assembled his own fleet and launched a surprise naval attack on the Hanseatic Fleet.
What factor primarily contributed to the Danish victory in the Battle of Helsingborg?
Answer: Most of Wittenborg's soldiers were engaged in the siege on land, leaving the fleet vulnerable.
The Danish achieved victory primarily because the majority of Wittenborg's soldiers were committed to the siege within Helsingborg, rendering the Hanseatic fleet vulnerable to Valdemar Atterdag's unexpected naval assault.
How did the Hanseatic League's strategy contribute to their defeat at Helsingborg?
Answer: Their commander diverted the main fighting force to besiege the town, leaving the fleet vulnerable.
The Hanseatic League's strategy was a critical factor in their defeat because their commander, Johann Wittenborg, committed his primary fighting force to besiege the town of Helsingborg, thereby leaving the Hanseatic fleet exposed and vulnerable to a surprise attack.
Valdemar IV, King of Denmark, commanded the Hanseatic League forces during the battle.
Answer: False
Valdemar IV, King of Denmark, commanded the Danish forces, while Johann Wittenborg led the Hanseatic League forces.
Johann Wittenborg, the Mayor of Lübeck, led the Hanseatic League forces.
Answer: True
Johann Wittenborg, the Mayor of Lübeck, was appointed to command the Hanseatic attack force and led their forces in the battle.
Denmark suffered the loss of 12 cogs and several nobles captured during the Battle of Helsingborg.
Answer: False
The Hanseatic League, not Denmark, suffered the loss of 12 cogs and had several nobles captured. The specific casualties for Denmark are unknown.
Specific casualties and losses for Denmark during the Battle of Helsingborg are well-documented in the provided source.
Answer: False
The provided source material explicitly states that the specific casualties and losses for Denmark during the Battle of Helsingborg are unknown.
Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was a Hanseatic commander who was killed in action during the battle.
Answer: False
Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was the son of the Danish King Valdemar IV and was wounded in action, not a Hanseatic commander killed in action.
Swedish Henrik Smith's chronicle from the early 16th century states that Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was hit by a rock while fighting at sea.
Answer: True
Swedish Henrik Smith's chronicle from the early 16th century explicitly states that Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was struck by a rock while fighting at sea.
Johann Wittenborg was celebrated as a hero upon his return to Lübeck for his leadership during the war.
Answer: False
Upon his return to Lübeck, Johann Wittenborg was tried and executed for his perceived poor performance and leadership during the war, not celebrated as a hero.
The nobles captured by the Danish forces were executed shortly after the battle.
Answer: False
The nobles captured by the Danish forces were later ransomed, not executed.
The abbreviation 'WIA' indicates that Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was 'Witnessed in Action'.
Answer: False
The abbreviation 'WIA' stands for 'Wounded in Action,' not 'Witnessed in Action'.
According to 'Nordisk familjebok,' Christopher, Duke of Lolland, suffered a mental disorder after being shot in the head with a rock.
Answer: True
The 'Nordisk familjebok' reports that Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was struck in the head with a rock and subsequently suffered from a mental disorder.
Valdemar IV of Denmark played a minor role in the battle, primarily observing from a distance.
Answer: False
Valdemar IV played a crucial and decisive role by assembling his fleet and launching a surprise attack, leading to the Danish victory.
Who was one of the primary commanders for Denmark during the Battle of Helsingborg?
Answer: Valdemar IV
Valdemar IV, the King of Denmark, was a primary commander for Denmark during the battle.
Who led the Hanseatic League forces in the Battle of Helsingborg?
Answer: Johann Wittenborg
Johann Wittenborg, the Mayor of Lübeck, led the Hanseatic League forces.
What were the casualties and losses for the Hanseatic League?
Answer: Loss of 12 cogs and several nobles captured
The Hanseatic League suffered the loss of 12 cogs and had several of their nobles captured.
What is known about the casualties and losses for Denmark during the Battle of Helsingborg?
Answer: The specific casualties and losses for Denmark are unknown.
The provided source material explicitly states that the specific casualties and losses for Denmark during the Battle of Helsingborg are unknown.
What was Johann Wittenborg's role in the Hanseatic attack?
Answer: Mayor of Lübeck and commander of the attack force
Johann Wittenborg was the Mayor of Lübeck and was appointed to command the Hanseatic attack force.
Who was Christopher, Duke of Lolland, and what happened to him during the battle?
Answer: The son of Valdemar IV who was injured.
Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was the son of King Valdemar IV of Denmark and sustained injuries during the Battle of Helsingborg.
According to Swedish Henrik Smith's chronicle, what caused Christopher, Duke of Lolland's injury?
Answer: Being hit by a rock while fighting at sea
Swedish Henrik Smith's chronicle states that Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was struck by a rock while engaged in combat at sea.
What was the fate of Johann Wittenborg after the battle?
Answer: He was tried and executed for poor performance.
Upon his return to Lübeck, Johann Wittenborg was tried and subsequently executed due to his perceived inadequate performance and leadership during the war.
What happened to the nobles captured by the Danish forces?
Answer: They were later ransomed.
The nobles captured by the Danish forces during the Battle of Helsingborg were later ransomed.
What does the term 'WIA' next to Christopher, Duke of Lolland's name signify?
Answer: Wounded in Action
The abbreviation 'WIA' stands for 'Wounded in Action,' indicating that Christopher, Duke of Lolland, sustained injuries during the Battle of Helsingborg.
According to 'Nordisk familjebok,' what was a long-term effect of Christopher, Duke of Lolland's injury?
Answer: He suffered from a mental disorder.
The 'Nordisk familjebok' reports that Christopher, Duke of Lolland, was struck in the head with a rock and subsequently suffered from a mental disorder as a result of his injury.
What was the role of Valdemar IV of Denmark in the battle?
Answer: He assembled his fleet and launched a surprise attack, leading to Danish victory.
Valdemar IV, King of Denmark, played a crucial role by assembling his fleet and launching a surprise attack on the Hanseatic forces, which directly led to the Danish victory.
The Battle of Helsingborg took place in the Øresund, the strait separating Zealand from Scania.
Answer: True
The battle is explicitly stated to have occurred in the Øresund, the strait separating the Danish island of Zealand from the southern Swedish province of Scania.
The image of Helsingborg in 1588 shows a town dominated by its bustling port rather than a citadel.
Answer: False
The 1588 image of Helsingborg is notably dominated by its citadel, a fortified structure, not a bustling port.
The Øresund was strategically important as a route for maritime trade and military movements.
Answer: True
The Øresund is described as a narrow strait that was strategically important for maritime trade and military movements in the region.
Cogs were small, fast warships primarily used for scouting, and their loss was minor for the Hanseatic League.
Answer: False
Cogs were single-masted sailing ships used for both trade and warfare, and the loss of 12 cogs was a substantial blow to the Hanseatic League's naval and economic power, not a minor loss.
A 'citadel' in Helsingborg refers to a fortified part of the town, serving as a defensive stronghold.
Answer: True
A 'citadel' refers to a fortress or a heavily fortified section of a town, typically built on high ground, serving as a primary defensive stronghold.
Where was the Battle of Helsingborg fought?
Answer: In the Øresund, off Helsingborg
The battle took place in the Øresund, the strait separating Zealand from Scania, specifically off the coast of Helsingborg.
What does the image of Helsingborg in 1588 depict as its dominant feature?
Answer: Its citadel
The 1588 image of Helsingborg is notably dominated by its citadel, a fortified structure.
What was the significance of the Øresund in the context of the battle?
Answer: It was a strategically important strait for maritime trade and military movements.
The Øresund is a narrow strait that was strategically important for maritime trade and military movements in the region.
What type of ship was a 'cog,' and why were their losses significant for the Hanseatic League?
Answer: A single-masted sailing ship used for trade and warfare; losses were a substantial blow to naval and economic power.
A 'cog' was a single-masted sailing ship used for trade and warfare. The loss of 12 cogs represented a substantial blow to the Hanseatic League's naval and economic power.
What does the term 'citadel' refer to in the context of Helsingborg?
Answer: A fortified part of the town, serving as a defensive stronghold
A 'citadel' refers to a fortress or a heavily fortified section of a town, typically constructed on elevated terrain, serving as a primary defensive stronghold.