Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
BoxRec is a website exclusively dedicated to maintaining records for professional male boxers.
Answer: False
BoxRec maintains records for both professional and amateur boxers, encompassing both male and female athletes, not exclusively professional male boxers.
The primary function of BoxRec is to provide a platform for live streaming boxing matches.
Answer: False
The primary function of BoxRec is to maintain updated records for professional and amateur boxers, not to provide live streaming of matches.
BoxRec hosts a MediaWiki-based encyclopedia that offers extensive information about boxing.
Answer: True
BoxRec indeed hosts a MediaWiki-based encyclopedia that provides extensive information about various aspects of boxing.
The main objective of BoxRec is to document every professional boxer and boxing match since the year 2000.
Answer: False
BoxRec's main objective is to document every professional boxer and boxing match from the inception of the Queensberry Rules, which date back to 1867, not just since the year 2000.
BoxRec publishes ratings only for non-active boxers, categorizing them by weight division.
Answer: False
BoxRec publishes ratings for all active boxers, categorized by weight division, and also maintains all-time ratings, not solely for non-active boxers.
Since 2012, BoxRec has been the host for Barry Hugman's History of World Championship Boxing.
Answer: True
The source confirms that BoxRec has hosted Barry Hugman's History of World Championship Boxing since 2012, providing a valuable historical resource.
Registration is not required to access the official BoxRec website.
Answer: False
User registration is required to access the official BoxRec website and utilize its features.
The official web address for BoxRec is boxrec.org.
Answer: False
The official web address for BoxRec is boxrec.com, not boxrec.org.
BoxRec operates as a non-profit organization.
Answer: False
BoxRec is a commercial website, indicating it operates with a business model, rather than as a non-profit organization.
BoxRec is currently an active and operational website.
Answer: True
BoxRec is currently active and fully operational, continuously updated with boxing records and information.
BoxRec is generally classified as a general sports news website.
Answer: False
BoxRec is classified as a specialized boxing and sports website, focusing specifically on boxing, rather than a general sports news website.
What is the primary function of BoxRec?
Answer: To maintain updated records for professional and amateur boxers.
BoxRec's primary function is to serve as a comprehensive online database for maintaining updated records for both professional and amateur boxers, encompassing male and female athletes.
Besides boxer records, what additional resource does BoxRec offer?
Answer: A MediaWiki-based encyclopedia about boxing.
In addition to its boxer records, BoxRec hosts a MediaWiki-based encyclopedia that provides extensive information about various aspects of boxing.
From what historical point does BoxRec aim to document every professional boxer and boxing match?
Answer: The inception of the Queensberry Rules.
BoxRec's main objective is to document every professional boxer and boxing match from the inception of the Queensberry Rules, which were drafted in 1867 and form the basis of modern boxing.
What kind of ratings does BoxRec publish for boxers?
Answer: Ratings for active boxers by weight division and all-time ratings.
BoxRec publishes ratings for all active boxers, categorized by weight division, and also maintains comprehensive all-time ratings.
What significant historical boxing content has BoxRec hosted since 2012?
Answer: Barry Hugman's History of World Championship Boxing.
Since 2012, BoxRec has hosted Barry Hugman's History of World Championship Boxing, providing users with a valuable historical resource.
Is registration required to access the official BoxRec website?
Answer: Yes, registration is required.
User registration is required to access the official BoxRec website and fully utilize its features.
What is the official web address for BoxRec?
Answer: boxrec.com
The official web address for BoxRec, providing direct access to its comprehensive boxing records and encyclopedia, is boxrec.com.
What is the general classification of BoxRec as a website?
Answer: A boxing and sports website.
BoxRec is generally classified as a specialized boxing and sports website, focusing specifically on the sport of boxing.
Which of the following statements about BoxRec's operational status is true?
Answer: It is a commercial website and currently active.
BoxRec is a commercial website that is currently active and continuously updated with boxing records and information.
John Sheppard always viewed boxing as an art form before founding BoxRec.
Answer: False
Before founding BoxRec, John Sheppard initially viewed boxing as a barbaric and degrading spectacle, not as an art form.
John Sheppard's change of heart about boxing occurred after attending a Mike Tyson fight in 1998.
Answer: False
John Sheppard's perspective on boxing changed after attending a Prince Naseem Hamed fight in 1995, not a Mike Tyson fight in 1998.
During Naseem Hamed's fight, John Sheppard realized the subtlety and genius of Hamed's actions, transforming his view of boxing into an art form.
Answer: True
John Sheppard's profound realization during Naseem Hamed's fight led him to perceive the subtlety and genius of Hamed's actions, thereby transforming his view of boxing into an art form.
In 2000, John Sheppard began working for Frank Warren after Naseem Hamed's split with Prince Promotions.
Answer: False
In 2000, John Sheppard began working for Naseem Hamed at Prince Promotions, following Hamed's split with promoter Frank Warren, not for Frank Warren.
John Sheppard initially compiled records of British boxers to assist in the matchmaking process.
Answer: True
John Sheppard's initial motivation for compiling records of active British boxers was indeed to assist in the matchmaking process.
John Sheppard started working full-time on BoxRec in 2008.
Answer: False
John Sheppard committed to working full-time on BoxRec starting in 2005, not 2008.
Who founded BoxRec?
Answer: John Sheppard.
BoxRec was founded by John Sheppard, an Englishman, who is also the website's owner and creator.
What was John Sheppard's initial perspective on boxing before he founded BoxRec?
Answer: He viewed it as a barbaric and degrading spectacle.
Before founding BoxRec, John Sheppard initially viewed boxing as a barbaric and degrading spectacle, highlighting a significant shift in his later appreciation for the sport.
What specific event led to John Sheppard's change of heart about boxing?
Answer: Attending a Prince Naseem Hamed fight in 1995.
John Sheppard's perspective on boxing changed significantly after he attended a Prince Naseem Hamed fight in 1995.
How did John Sheppard describe his realization during Naseem Hamed's fight?
Answer: He perceived the subtlety and genius of Hamed's actions, transforming his view of boxing into an art form.
During Naseem Hamed's fight, John Sheppard realized the subtlety and genius of Hamed's actions, which profoundly transformed his view of boxing from a spectacle into an art form.
What role did John Sheppard take on in 2000 after Naseem Hamed's split with Frank Warren?
Answer: He started working for Hamed at Prince Promotions.
In 2000, John Sheppard began working for Naseem Hamed at Prince Promotions, following Hamed's separation from promoter Frank Warren.
What was John Sheppard's initial motivation for compiling records of British boxers?
Answer: To assist in the matchmaking process.
John Sheppard's initial motivation for compiling records of active British boxers was to assist in the matchmaking process, a practical need that eventually led to the creation of BoxRec.
When did John Sheppard transition to working full-time on BoxRec?
Answer: 2005
John Sheppard transitioned to working full-time on BoxRec in 2005, reflecting the website's growing importance and demand.
As of December 2008, BoxRec received approximately 500,000 visitors per day.
Answer: False
As of December 2008, BoxRec typically received around 50,000 visitors per day, not 500,000.
In December 2008, BoxRec's database contained records for 1,300,000 bouts.
Answer: True
In December 2008, BoxRec's database indeed contained records for 1,300,000 bouts, alongside approximately 700,000 daily page views.
BoxRec is organized and updated by a centralized team of paid employees in England.
Answer: False
BoxRec is organized and updated by a global network of volunteer editors assigned to specific countries or regions, not by a centralized team of paid employees in England.
Approximately how many visitors did BoxRec receive per day as of December 2008?
Answer: 50,000
As of December 2008, BoxRec received approximately 50,000 visitors per day, indicating its significant user base within the boxing community.
How many bouts were recorded in BoxRec's database as of December 2008?
Answer: 1,300,000
In December 2008, BoxRec's database contained records for an extensive 1,300,000 bouts, demonstrating its comprehensive coverage.
How is the BoxRec website primarily organized and updated?
Answer: By a global network of volunteer editors assigned to specific regions.
BoxRec is organized and updated by a global network of volunteer editors, each assigned to specific countries or regions to maintain accurate boxing records.
As of December 2008, how many active fighters were documented on BoxRec?
Answer: 17,000
As of December 2008, BoxRec's database included records for 17,000 active fighters, alongside 345,000 non-active fighters.
What was the approximate number of non-active fighters documented on BoxRec as of December 2008?
Answer: 345,000
As of December 2008, BoxRec's database included records for 345,000 non-active fighters, in addition to 17,000 active fighters.
A primary criticism of BoxRec is its consistent accuracy, especially concerning historical data.
Answer: False
A primary criticism of BoxRec is its *inconsistent* accuracy, particularly concerning historical data, rather than consistent accuracy.
BoxRec first applied for official recognition as a record-keeper from the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) in 2005.
Answer: True
BoxRec first formally applied for official recognition as a record-keeper from the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) in 2005.
In 2005, BoxRec's main competitor for official ABC recognition was CompuBox.
Answer: False
In 2005, BoxRec's main competitor for official ABC recognition was Fight Fax, not CompuBox.
The ABC panel unanimously voted to award BoxRec the position of official record-keeper in 2005.
Answer: False
In 2005, the ABC panel unanimously voted to award Fight Fax the position of official record-keeper, not BoxRec.
In 2005, ABC tests showed Fight Fax's records were 100% accurate, while BoxRec's were substantially less accurate.
Answer: True
ABC tests conducted in 2005 indeed revealed that Fight Fax's records were 100% accurate, whereas BoxRec's records demonstrated substantially lower accuracy at that specific time.
The Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) eventually recognized BoxRec as an official record-keeper in 2016.
Answer: True
The Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) eventually voted in 2016 to recognize BoxRec as an official record-keeper, a significant milestone for the website's credibility.
Boxing promoter J. Russell Peltz stated that BoxRec's historical records were entirely without error.
Answer: False
Boxing promoter J. Russell Peltz acknowledged that while few things are 100% accurate, he had encountered 'glaring errors' on BoxRec, particularly within its historical records, indicating they were not entirely without error.
ESPN's Dan Rafael praised BoxRec for its flawless accuracy, citing Ricardo Mayorga's record as an example.
Answer: False
ESPN's Dan Rafael noted that BoxRec's records are not always accurate due to many contributors, citing Ricardo Mayorga's and Derrick Gainer's records as examples of long-standing mistakes, thus not praising it for flawless accuracy.
Lou DiBella, a boxing promoter, suggested that using BoxRec is optional for professionals in the sport.
Answer: False
Lou DiBella emphatically stated that anyone in boxing who claims not to use BoxRec is either 'a complete imbecile or being dishonest,' indicating its perceived indispensability, not optionality.
Bruce Trampler, a matchmaker for Top Rank, considers BoxRec the best available source of information, short of being present at a fight.
Answer: True
Bruce Trampler, a matchmaker for Top Rank, indeed praised BoxRec as the best available source of information, second only to direct observation of a fight.
Ron Scott Stevens, chairman of the New York State Athletic Commission, believes Fight Fax always surpasses BoxRec in data scope.
Answer: False
Ron Scott Stevens acknowledged that while Fight Fax is mandated, BoxRec often surpasses Fight Fax in many respects, suggesting it offers a broader or more detailed scope of data, contrary to the statement.
Boxer David Haye expressed indifference towards his record displayed on BoxRec.
Answer: False
Boxer David Haye commented on how his single professional loss 'truly stood out' on his BoxRec record, indicating a personal engagement rather than indifference.
What is a primary criticism directed at BoxRec, particularly concerning its historical data?
Answer: It does not consistently maintain accurate records, especially historically.
A primary criticism of BoxRec is its inconsistent accuracy, particularly concerning historical data, which has led to questions about its reliability for older records.
When did BoxRec first apply to be recognized as an official record-keeper by the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC)?
Answer: 2005
BoxRec first formally applied for official recognition as a record-keeper from the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) in 2005.
Who was BoxRec's main competitor for official ABC recognition in 2005?
Answer: Fight Fax
In 2005, BoxRec's main competitor for official recognition by the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) was Fight Fax.
What was the outcome of the ABC's decision regarding official record-keeper status in 2005?
Answer: Fight Fax was unanimously awarded the status.
In 2005, the ABC panel unanimously voted to award Fight Fax the position of official record-keeper, indicating a preference for its established accuracy at that time.
How did the ABC assess the accuracy of BoxRec's records compared to Fight Fax in 2005?
Answer: Fight Fax's records were 100% accurate, while BoxRec's were substantially lower.
ABC tests in 2005 showed Fight Fax's records were 100% accurate, whereas BoxRec's records were found to have substantially lower accuracy at that time.
When did the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) eventually recognize BoxRec as an official record-keeper?
Answer: 2016
The Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) eventually voted in 2016 to recognize BoxRec as an official record-keeper, a significant development for the website's credibility.
Which boxing promoter raised concerns about 'glaring errors' in BoxRec's historical records?
Answer: J. Russell Peltz
Boxing promoter J. Russell Peltz raised concerns about 'glaring errors' he encountered on BoxRec, particularly within its historical records.
Which ESPN journalist pointed out inaccuracies in BoxRec's records, citing Ricardo Mayorga's and Derrick Gainer's records as examples?
Answer: Dan Rafael
ESPN's Dan Rafael specifically pointed out inaccuracies in BoxRec's records, citing Ricardo Mayorga's and Derrick Gainer's records as examples of long-standing mistakes.
How did boxing promoter Lou DiBella express the importance of BoxRec to professionals in the sport?
Answer: He emphatically stated that anyone in boxing who claims not to use BoxRec is either a complete imbecile or being dishonest.
Lou DiBella emphatically stated that BoxRec is indispensable for professionals in boxing, suggesting that denying its use indicates either incompetence or dishonesty.
What was Bruce Trampler's assessment of BoxRec's information quality?
Answer: He praised it as the best available source of information, short of actually being present at a fight.
Bruce Trampler, a matchmaker for Top Rank, praised BoxRec as the best available source of information, second only to direct observation of a fight, highlighting its high utility.
What was Ron Scott Stevens' view on BoxRec's capabilities compared to Fight Fax?
Answer: He acknowledged BoxRec often surpasses Fight Fax in many respects.
Ron Scott Stevens acknowledged that BoxRec often surpasses Fight Fax in many respects, suggesting it offers a broader or more detailed scope of data, even though Fight Fax is the mandated record-keeper.
How did boxer David Haye personally relate to his record on BoxRec?
Answer: He commented on his single professional loss, noting how it stood out.
Boxer David Haye personally related to his BoxRec record by commenting on how his single professional loss at the time 'truly stood out' to him, indicating its personal significance.
As of August 2024, BoxRec announced it would no longer recognize World Boxing Association (WBA) world championship fights as being for world titles.
Answer: True
BoxRec indeed announced in August 2024 that it would no longer recognize WBA world championship fights as being for world titles, reflecting a change in its validation criteria.
Following BoxRec's August 2024 decision, WBA world champions will still be recognized by the website as having been world champions for their WBA titles.
Answer: False
Following BoxRec's August 2024 decision, individuals who held WBA world championships will no longer be recognized by the website as having been world champions for their WBA titles.
What significant policy change did BoxRec announce regarding the World Boxing Association (WBA) in August 2024?
Answer: It would no longer recognize WBA world championship fights as being for world titles.
As of August 2024, BoxRec announced a policy change stating it would no longer recognize World Boxing Association (WBA) world championship fights as being for legitimate world titles.
What is the consequence of BoxRec's August 2024 decision for WBA world champions?
Answer: Individuals who held WBA world championships will no longer be recognized by the website as having been world champions for their WBA titles.
Following BoxRec's August 2024 decision, individuals who held WBA world championships will no longer be recognized by the website as having been world champions, specifically concerning their WBA titles.