Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a monthly publication of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a quarterly publication, not monthly, and is published by the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is an independent publication with no formal ties to the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a publication of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, indicating a formal affiliation.
The 'Canadian Region' designation for the *Review* signifies its exclusive focus on the federal parliament of Canada.
Answer: False
The 'Canadian Region' designation signifies the *Review*'s focus on parliamentary affairs relevant to Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial legislatures, connecting them to the broader Commonwealth network, not an exclusive focus on the federal parliament.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* supports the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association in Canada by informing Canadian legislators about the activities of its various branches.
Answer: True
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* supports the CPA in Canada by informing Canadian legislators about the activities of its federal, provincial, and territorial branches, strengthening inter-parliamentary ties.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* exclusively focuses on municipal legislative institutions within Canada.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* focuses on Canadian parliamentary institutions at the federal, provincial, and territorial levels, as well as broader legislative institutions relevant to the Commonwealth, not exclusively municipal ones.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is published bi-annually, providing two updates per year.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a quarterly publication, meaning it is released four times a year, not bi-annually.
Which organization is responsible for publishing the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: The Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a publication of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
What is the overarching goal of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, as mentioned in the context of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: To foster good governance and democratic principles across the Commonwealth.
The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association serves as a network for parliaments and parliamentarians across the Commonwealth, fostering good governance and democratic principles.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a publication of which specific entity?
Answer: The Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a publication of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
The 'Canadian Region' designation of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* signifies its focus on:
Answer: Parliamentary affairs relevant to Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial legislatures, connecting them to the broader Commonwealth.
The 'Canadian Region' designation means the *Review* focuses on parliamentary affairs relevant to Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial legislatures, while also connecting them to the broader Commonwealth network.
How frequently is the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* published?
Answer: Quarterly
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is a quarterly publication, released four times a year.
How does the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* contribute to strengthening inter-parliamentary communication within Canada?
Answer: By informing Canadian legislators about the activities of the federal, provincial, and territorial branches of the CPA Canadian Region.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* strengthens inter-parliamentary communication by informing Canadian legislators about the activities of the federal, provincial, and territorial branches of the CPA Canadian Region.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* focuses on legislative institutions at which levels?
Answer: Canadian federal, provincial, and territorial levels, as well as broader legislative institutions relevant to the Commonwealth.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* focuses on Canadian parliamentary institutions at the federal, provincial, and territorial levels, and broader legislative institutions relevant to its distribution throughout the Commonwealth.
The publication that eventually became the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* was initially launched under the name *Canadian Regional Review* in 1978.
Answer: True
The publication began as a newsletter called the *Canadian Regional Review* in 1978, before being renamed and undergoing a format change.
The provisional editorial board responsible for the *Canadian Regional Review* at its inception consisted of ten members.
Answer: False
The provisional editorial board at the inception of the *Canadian Regional Review* consisted of six members, not ten.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* adopted its current name in 1982, four years after its initial launch.
Answer: False
The publication was officially renamed the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* in 1980, two years after its initial launch in 1978.
Gary Levy was the first editor of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* after its renaming in 1980, overseeing a significant format change.
Answer: True
Gary Levy served as the first editor of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* following its renaming in 1980, during which period it also adopted a new format.
The publication evolved from a journal format in 1978 to a newsletter in 1980.
Answer: False
The publication began as a newsletter in 1978 and evolved into a more established journal format in 1980, the opposite of the statement.
The provisional editorial board's main role in 1978 was to manage the financial aspects of the *Canadian Regional Review*.
Answer: False
The provisional editorial board was responsible for overseeing the initial content and direction of the *Canadian Regional Review* newsletter, not its financial management.
The format change in 1980, under Gary Levy, marked a shift from a newsletter to a more established journal format for the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*.
Answer: True
In 1980, under Gary Levy, the publication underwent a format change, evolving from its original newsletter form to a more established journal format.
The *Canadian Regional Review* was initially launched as a full-fledged academic journal.
Answer: False
The publication initially began as a newsletter called the *Canadian Regional Review* in 1978, not a full-fledged academic journal.
How many members comprised the provisional editorial board at the inception of the *Canadian Regional Review* in 1978?
Answer: Six
At its beginning in 1978, the *Canadian Regional Review* was overseen by a provisional editorial board consisting of six members.
What was the primary responsibility of the six-member provisional editorial board in 1978?
Answer: To oversee the initial content and direction of the *Canadian Regional Review* newsletter.
The provisional six-member editorial board was responsible for overseeing the initial content and strategic direction of the *Canadian Regional Review* newsletter.
The format change in 1980 for the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* primarily involved a shift from:
Answer: A newsletter to a more established journal format.
In 1980, the publication adopted a format change, evolving from its original newsletter form to a more established journal format.
What was the initial format of the publication that would become the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: A newsletter.
The publication initially began as a newsletter called the *Canadian Regional Review* in 1978.
In which year was the publication officially renamed the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: 1980
The publication was officially renamed the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* in 1980.
Who served as the first editor of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* after its renaming and format change in 1980?
Answer: Gary Levy
Gary Levy served as the first editor of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* following its renaming in 1980.
The evolution of the publication involved starting as a newsletter in 1978, then being renamed and undergoing a format change in what year?
Answer: 1980
The publication started as a newsletter in 1978, and was renamed the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* and underwent a format change in 1980.
In what year did the publication, then known as the *Canadian Regional Review*, first commence?
Answer: 1978
The publication, then known as the *Canadian Regional Review*, commenced in 1978.
The primary objective of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is to inform international legislators about global parliamentary developments.
Answer: False
The primary objective of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is to inform *Canadian* legislators about the activities of the *Canadian Region* of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, not international legislators about global developments broadly.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aims to promote the study of and interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
Answer: True
A secondary objective of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is to promote the study of and foster interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
Articles in the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* are exclusively written by current legislators and academic professors.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* features articles by a diverse group including current and former legislators, legislative staff, professors, journalists, and others interested in legislative institutions.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* primarily publishes content focused on international economic policies.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* publishes articles by and about legislators, staff, professors, and journalists interested in legislative institutions, focusing on Canadian parliamentary institutions and CPA activities, not primarily international economic policies.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* contributes to the study of Canadian parliamentary institutions by publishing diverse articles from various contributors.
Answer: True
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* promotes the study of Canadian parliamentary institutions by featuring articles from a diverse range of contributors, including academics and legislative experts.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* informs legislators primarily about historical parliamentary debates.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aims to inform Canadian legislators about the activities of the federal, provincial, and territorial branches of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, focusing on current developments rather than primarily historical debates.
The overall mission of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is solely to publish academic research on legislative processes.
Answer: False
The overall mission of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is dual-faceted: to inform Canadian legislators about CPA activities and to foster the study of and interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions, not solely to publish academic research.
Will Stos is the current editor of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*.
Answer: True
Will Stos is the current editor of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aims to inform Canadian legislators about the activities of all international parliamentary associations.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aims to inform Canadian legislators about the activities of the *Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association*, not all international parliamentary associations.
What is a primary objective of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* regarding Canadian legislators?
Answer: To inform them about the activities of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
A key objective of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is to inform Canadian legislators about the activities of the federal, provincial, and territorial branches of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
Which group is explicitly mentioned as contributing articles to the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: Current and former legislators.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* features articles written by and about current and former legislators, legislative staff, professors, journalists, and others interested in legislative institutions.
What kind of information does the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aim to provide to Canadian legislators?
Answer: Information regarding the activities of the federal, provincial, and territorial branches of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aims to provide Canadian legislators with information regarding the activities of the federal, provincial, and territorial branches of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
Who currently holds the position of editor for the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: Will Stos
Will Stos is the current editor of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*.
What secondary objective does the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aim to achieve?
Answer: To promote the study of and interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* aims to promote the study of and foster interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions as a secondary objective.
What kind of content is *not* typically found in the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: Articles on international sports events.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* publishes articles by and about legislators, legislative staff, professors, and journalists interested in legislative institutions, focusing on parliamentary life and study, not international sports events.
How does the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* foster a deeper understanding of Canadian parliamentary institutions?
Answer: By publishing articles from a diverse range of contributors, including academics and legislative experts.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* promotes the study of Canadian parliamentary institutions by publishing articles from a diverse range of contributors, including academics and legislative experts.
The dual mission of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* involves informing legislators and what other key objective?
Answer: To foster the study of and interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
The dual mission of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is to inform Canadian legislators about CPA activities and to foster the study of and interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
Within Canada, the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed only to federal legislators.
Answer: False
Within Canada, the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed to all federal, provincial, and territorial legislators.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is available in both English and a separate French language edition titled *La Revue parlementaire canadienne*.
Answer: True
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is published in both English and a separate French edition, *La Revue parlementaire canadienne*, reflecting Canada's official bilingualism.
The geographical scope of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*'s distribution is limited to Canada and the United Kingdom.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed to all Canadian legislators, and by subscription to individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the broader Commonwealth.
The publication of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* in both English and French reflects Canada's official bilingualism and ensures wider accessibility.
Answer: True
The publication of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* in both English and French reflects Canada's official bilingualism and ensures accessibility to a wider audience across the country and internationally.
The primary benefit of distributing the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* to all Canadian legislators is to generate subscription revenue.
Answer: False
The primary benefit of distributing the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* to all Canadian legislators is to ensure they are informed about CPA activities and to foster interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions, not to generate subscription revenue.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* extends its reach beyond legislators solely through distribution to government libraries.
Answer: False
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* extends its reach beyond legislators by offering subscriptions to interested individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the Commonwealth, not solely through government libraries.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed to interested individuals and institutions in the United States through subscription.
Answer: True
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed by subscription to interested individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the broader Commonwealth.
To whom is the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* primarily distributed within Canada?
Answer: All federal, provincial, and territorial legislators.
Within Canada, the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed to all federal, provincial, and territorial legislators.
What is the significance of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* being published in both English and French?
Answer: It reflects Canada's official bilingualism and ensures accessibility to a wider audience.
The publication of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* in both English and French reflects Canada's official bilingualism and ensures accessibility to a wider audience across the country and internationally.
In addition to Canadian legislators, where else is the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* distributed by subscription?
Answer: To interested individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the broader Commonwealth.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed by subscription to interested individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the broader Commonwealth.
The broad geographical reach of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* includes distribution to all Canadian legislators, and by subscription to individuals and institutions in the United States and:
Answer: Throughout the broader Commonwealth.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is distributed by subscription to interested individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the broader Commonwealth.
What is the title of the separate French language edition of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: *La Revue parlementaire canadienne*
The separate French language edition of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is titled *La Revue parlementaire canadienne*.
What is a key benefit of distributing the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* to all federal, provincial, and territorial legislators in Canada?
Answer: To ensure key decision-makers are informed about CPA activities and foster interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
The primary benefit of distributing the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* to all federal, provincial, and territorial legislators is to ensure these key decision-makers are informed about CPA activities and to foster interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
How does the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* broaden its readership beyond Canadian legislators?
Answer: By offering subscriptions to interested individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the Commonwealth.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review* broadens its readership by offering subscriptions to interested individuals and institutions in Canada, the United States, and throughout the Commonwealth.
Only current issues of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* are accessible online; back issues require a special request.
Answer: False
All back issues of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* are made available on the web, hosted on the current website.
The current *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website serves as the primary online portal, hosting both current and back issues in English and French.
Answer: True
The current *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website hosts both current and all back issues of the publication, available in both English and French.
The Wikipedia article about the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is praised for its balanced use of primary and secondary sources.
Answer: False
The Wikipedia article about the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is noted for relying excessively on primary sources and would benefit from secondary or tertiary sources for a more balanced perspective.
The Wikipedia article on the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is classified as a 'stub,' indicating it is incomplete and requires further expansion.
Answer: True
The Wikipedia article about the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is categorized as a 'stub,' meaning it is a short, incomplete article requiring further expansion.
The practical implication of all back issues being online is that it creates a comprehensive digital archive, enhancing research capabilities.
Answer: True
The availability of all back issues online creates a comprehensive digital archive, making historical content easily accessible for research and enhancing transparency.
The current *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website only features articles published within the last year.
Answer: False
The current *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website hosts both current and all back issues of the publication, not just those from the last year.
The former *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website now functions as an archive for older content, distinct from the current website which hosts both current and back issues.
Answer: True
The former *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website serves as an archive for older content, while the current website hosts both current and all back issues.
Adding secondary or tertiary sources to the Wikipedia article on the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* would decrease its verifiability.
Answer: False
Adding secondary or tertiary sources to the Wikipedia article would improve its verifiability and provide a more balanced and authoritative perspective, as it currently relies excessively on primary sources.
The 'stub' classification of the Wikipedia article implies that it is a highly specialized and niche topic.
Answer: False
The 'stub' classification of a Wikipedia article indicates that it is a short, incomplete article requiring further expansion, not that it is a highly specialized or niche topic.
The current *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website serves as the primary online portal for what content?
Answer: Current and back issues of the publication in both English and French.
The current *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website hosts both current and all back issues of the publication, available in both English and French.
What is the practical implication of all back issues of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* being available on the web?
Answer: It provides a comprehensive digital archive, making historical content easily accessible for research.
The availability of all back issues on the web creates a comprehensive digital archive, making historical content and research on Canadian parliamentary institutions easily accessible.
What is the function of the *former* *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website?
Answer: It serves as an archive for older content in both English and French.
The former *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website now functions as an archive, providing access to older content in both English and French.
The Wikipedia article about the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is criticized for relying excessively on what type of sources?
Answer: Primary sources
The Wikipedia article about the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is noted for relying excessively on primary sources.
The Wikipedia article about the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* is classified as a 'stub,' meaning it is:
Answer: An article that is too short and incomplete, requiring expansion.
The 'stub' classification of a Wikipedia article means it is a short article that provides only basic information and is considered incomplete, requiring further expansion.
What is true regarding the online accessibility of past issues of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: All back issues are made available on the web.
All back issues of the *Canadian Parliamentary Review* are made available on the web, hosted on the current website.
What kind of content is typically found on the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*'s current website?
Answer: Current and back issues of the publication, available in both English and French.
The *Canadian Parliamentary Review*'s current website features both current and all back issues of the publication, available in both English and French.
The distinction between the current and former *Canadian Parliamentary Review* websites is that the former now serves as:
Answer: An archive for older content.
The former *Canadian Parliamentary Review* website now functions as an archive for older content, while the current website hosts both current and all back issues.
Why is the inclusion of secondary or tertiary sources recommended for the Wikipedia article on the *Canadian Parliamentary Review*?
Answer: To provide a more balanced and authoritative perspective and improve verifiability.
The Wikipedia article relies excessively on primary sources; adding secondary or tertiary sources would improve its verifiability and provide a more balanced and authoritative perspective.
What does the 'stub' classification of the Wikipedia article imply for its content?
Answer: It is a short article that provides only basic information and is considered incomplete.
The 'stub' classification implies that the Wikipedia article is a short article providing only basic information and is considered incomplete, requiring further expansion.