Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?

History of Cavite's At-Large Congressional Representation

At a Glance

Title: History of Cavite's At-Large Congressional Representation

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Understanding At-Large Representation and Early Philippine Legislatures: 11 flashcards, 11 questions
  • The American Colonial Period: Philippine Assembly and Legislatures (1907-1935): 15 flashcards, 24 questions
  • The Commonwealth and Wartime Republics (1935-1946): 8 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Post-War National Legislatures and the Batasang Pambansa (1946-1986): 10 flashcards, 12 questions
  • The End of At-Large Representation in Cavite: 5 flashcards, 2 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 49
  • True/False Questions: 31
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 26
  • Total Questions: 57

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about History of Cavite's At-Large Congressional Representation

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Cavite's at-large congressional district" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: History of Cavite's At-Large Congressional Representation

Study Guide: History of Cavite's At-Large Congressional Representation

Understanding At-Large Representation and Early Philippine Legislatures

The article 'Cavite's at-large congressional district' primarily details the historical evolution of Cavite's representation in national legislatures, rather than its current system.

Answer: True

The source material indicates that the article focuses on the historical representation of Cavite in various national legislatures where representatives were elected province-wide, contrasting this with the later creation of distinct congressional districts.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of the article 'Cavite's at-large congressional district'?: The article 'Cavite's at-large congressional district' details the historical representation of the province of Cavite in various Philippine national legislatures where representatives were elected province-wide, rather than from specific districts. This system was in place before the creation of distinct congressional districts in 1987.

The term 'at-large' in legislative representation signifies election to serve an entire province or region, rather than a specific, smaller geographical subdivision.

Answer: True

As defined in the source, 'at-large' representation means a legislator is elected to serve an entire province or region, not a specific subdivision within it.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'at-large' signify in the context of legislative representation?: In legislative terms, 'at-large' means that a representative is elected to serve an entire province or region, rather than being elected from a specific, smaller geographical subdivision within that area, such as a city or municipality. This contrasts with district-based representation where each representative serves a defined district.

Cavite elected representatives at-large for the Malolos Congress, the Philippine Commonwealth, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa.

Answer: True

Cavite's history of at-large representation includes the Malolos Congress (First Philippine Republic), the Philippine Commonwealth, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa, as documented in the provided information.

Related Concepts:

  • For which legislative bodies did Cavite elect representatives at-large?: Cavite elected representatives at-large for several legislative bodies throughout its history. These include the Malolos Congress of the First Philippine Republic, various legislatures during the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands, the Philippine Commonwealth, the Second Philippine Republic, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?: Cavite's at-large district was established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on September 16, 1935.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Regular Batasang Pambansa?: Cavite's at-large district was re-established for the Regular Batasang Pambansa on February 1, 1984.

Four representatives were elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress.

Answer: True

The Malolos Congress, the national assembly of the First Philippine Republic, saw Cavite elect four representatives on an at-large basis.

Related Concepts:

  • How many representatives did Cavite send at-large to the Malolos Congress?: Cavite sent four representatives at-large to the National Assembly of the First Philippine Republic, known as the Malolos Congress, which convened from 1898 to 1901.

Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca were the representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress.

Answer: True

The four individuals elected as at-large representatives for Cavite to the Malolos Congress were Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress?: The four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress were Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca. All were elected in 1898 and served until March 23, 1901.

The four representatives elected to the Malolos Congress from Cavite were affiliated with the Independent party, not the Nacionalista Party.

Answer: True

Contrary to the assertion, the four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress were affiliated with the Independent party.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the political party affiliation of the representatives elected to the Malolos Congress?: All four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress, Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca, were affiliated with the Independent party.

Cavite elected multiple representatives at-large for the Malolos Congress and the Second Philippine Republic, but not for the 7th Philippine Congress.

Answer: True

While Cavite did elect multiple representatives at-large for the Malolos Congress and the Second Philippine Republic, the provided information does not indicate multiple at-large representatives for the 7th Philippine Congress.

Related Concepts:

  • Which legislative bodies had multiple representatives elected at-large from Cavite?: Cavite elected multiple representatives at-large on three occasions: four representatives for the Malolos Congress (1898-1901), two representatives for the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), and three representatives for the Regular Batasang Pambansa (1984-1986).
  • For which legislative bodies did Cavite elect representatives at-large?: Cavite elected representatives at-large for several legislative bodies throughout its history. These include the Malolos Congress of the First Philippine Republic, various legislatures during the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands, the Philippine Commonwealth, the Second Philippine Republic, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa.
  • How many representatives did Cavite send at-large to the Malolos Congress?: Cavite sent four representatives at-large to the National Assembly of the First Philippine Republic, known as the Malolos Congress, which convened from 1898 to 1901.

What does the term 'at-large' signify in the context of legislative representation?

Answer: Representation elected to serve an entire province or region, rather than a specific subdivision.

In legislative contexts, 'at-large' signifies representation elected to serve an entire province or region, rather than a specific subdivision within it.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'at-large' signify in the context of legislative representation?: In legislative terms, 'at-large' means that a representative is elected to serve an entire province or region, rather than being elected from a specific, smaller geographical subdivision within that area, such as a city or municipality. This contrasts with district-based representation where each representative serves a defined district.

Which legislative body convened from 1898 to 1901, for which Cavite elected four representatives at-large?

Answer: The Malolos Congress

The Malolos Congress, convened from 1898 to 1901, was the legislative body for which Cavite elected four representatives at-large.

Related Concepts:

  • How many representatives did Cavite send at-large to the Malolos Congress?: Cavite sent four representatives at-large to the National Assembly of the First Philippine Republic, known as the Malolos Congress, which convened from 1898 to 1901.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created on January 9, 1907, for the Philippine Assembly, which was part of the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands.
  • For which legislative bodies did Cavite elect representatives at-large?: Cavite elected representatives at-large for several legislative bodies throughout its history. These include the Malolos Congress of the First Philippine Republic, various legislatures during the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands, the Philippine Commonwealth, the Second Philippine Republic, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa.

Who were among the four Independent party representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress?

Answer: Severino de las Alas and Hugo Ilagan

Severino de las Alas and Hugo Ilagan were among the four Independent party representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the political party affiliation of the representatives elected to the Malolos Congress?: All four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress, Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca, were affiliated with the Independent party.
  • Who were the four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress?: The four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress were Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca. All were elected in 1898 and served until March 23, 1901.

Which of the following legislative bodies did NOT have representatives elected at-large from Cavite, according to the article?

Answer: Senate of the Philippines

According to the article, the Senate of the Philippines did not have representatives elected at-large from Cavite, unlike the Malolos Congress and the Philippine Assembly.

Related Concepts:

  • For which legislative bodies did Cavite elect representatives at-large?: Cavite elected representatives at-large for several legislative bodies throughout its history. These include the Malolos Congress of the First Philippine Republic, various legislatures during the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands, the Philippine Commonwealth, the Second Philippine Republic, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa.
  • Which legislative bodies had multiple representatives elected at-large from Cavite?: Cavite elected multiple representatives at-large on three occasions: four representatives for the Malolos Congress (1898-1901), two representatives for the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), and three representatives for the Regular Batasang Pambansa (1984-1986).
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created on January 9, 1907, for the Philippine Assembly, which was part of the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands.

The American Colonial Period: Philippine Assembly and Legislatures (1907-1935)

Cavite's at-large congressional district did not cease to exist in 1907; rather, it was re-established for the Philippine Assembly in that year.

Answer: True

The source indicates that Cavite's at-large district was re-established in 1907 for the Philippine Assembly, rather than ceasing to exist.

Related Concepts:

  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created on January 9, 1907, for the Philippine Assembly, which was part of the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands.

Rafael Palma was not the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress; he was the first for the Philippine Assembly.

Answer: True

Rafael Palma served as the first at-large representative for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly, not the Malolos Congress.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly?: Rafael Palma was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly. He served from October 16, 1907, until July 1, 1908, when he resigned upon his appointment as a Philippine commissioner.

Rafael Palma represented the Nacionalista Party during his term in the Philippine Assembly.

Answer: True

During his tenure as the at-large representative for Cavite in the Philippine Assembly, Rafael Palma was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party.

Related Concepts:

  • What party did Rafael Palma represent during his term in the Philippine Assembly?: Rafael Palma represented the Nacionalista Party during his term as the at-large representative for Cavite in the Philippine Assembly.

Emiliano Tria Tirona was initially elected to the Philippine Assembly to fill a vacancy caused by Rafael Palma's resignation.

Answer: True

Emiliano Tria Tirona's entry into the Philippine Assembly as Cavite's at-large representative occurred via a special election in 1909, necessitated by Rafael Palma's resignation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Emiliano Tria Tirona become a representative for Cavite's at-large district?: Emiliano Tria Tirona was elected to represent Cavite's at-large district in the Philippine Assembly in a special election in 1909 to fill the vacancy left by Rafael Palma. He was subsequently re-elected in the general election of 1909 and served until October 16, 1912.

Emiliano Tria Tirona was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party during his service in the Philippine Assembly, not the Demócrata Party.

Answer: True

Sources indicate that Emiliano Tria Tirona was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party during his service in the Philippine Assembly, contradicting the notion of continuous affiliation with the Demócrata Party during that period.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Emiliano Tria Tirona's party affiliation during his service in the Philippine Assembly?: Emiliano Tria Tirona was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party when he was first elected in the special election of 1909 and continued to represent this party after being re-elected in the general election of 1909.

Florentino Joya represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature, belonging to the Nacionalista Party.

Answer: True

Florentino Joya served as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 3rd Philippine Legislature and was a member of the Nacionalista Party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature?: Florentino Joya represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1912 and served his term from October 16, 1912, to October 16, 1916.

Cavite's representation did not shift entirely to single-member districts with the 4th Philippine Legislature in 1916; the article suggests a transition period or specific circumstances involving at-large representation continuing.

Answer: True

The transition to single-member districts was not absolute in 1916 with the commencement of the 4th Philippine Legislature, as the article notes Emiliano Tría Tirona was elected for the at-large district in that year.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Cavite's representation shift to a single-member district system within the House of Representatives of the Philippine Islands?: Cavite's representation shifted to a single-member district system within the House of Representatives of the Philippine Islands starting with the 4th Philippine Legislature, which began on October 16, 1916. However, the article indicates that Emiliano Tría Tirona was elected for the at-large district in 1916, suggesting a transition period or specific circumstances.

Emiliano Tría Tirona belonged to the Demócrata Party when he represented Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature.

Answer: True

During his representation of Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature, Emiliano Tría Tirona was a member of the Demócrata Party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature?: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature. His term began on October 16, 1916, and concluded on June 3, 1919. He belonged to the Demócrata Party.

Emilio P. Virata succeeded Emiliano Tria Tirona, not Emiliano P. Virata, as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature.

Answer: True

Emilio P. Virata took over the role of at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature, succeeding Emiliano Tria Tirona.

Related Concepts:

  • Who succeeded Emiliano Tría Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature?: Emilio P. Virata succeeded Emiliano Tría Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1919 and served from June 3, 1919, to June 6, 1922, representing the Nacionalista Party.

Pedro F. Espiritu, a member of the Demócrata Party, represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature.

Answer: True

Pedro F. Espiritu represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature, and he was affiliated with the Demócrata Party.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the party affiliation of Pedro F. Espiritu, who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature?: Pedro F. Espiritu represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature as a member of the Demócrata Party. He served from June 6, 1922, to June 2, 1925.

Antero Soriano was elected to fill a vacancy in the 7th Philippine Legislature, but it was caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes, not Emiliano Tria Tirona.

Answer: True

Antero Soriano's election to the 7th Philippine Legislature filled a vacancy created by the death of Augusto A. Reyes, not Emiliano Tria Tirona.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was elected to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes in the 7th Philippine Legislature?: Antero Soriano was elected to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes in the 7th Philippine Legislature. Soriano served from August 15, 1925, to June 15, 1929, and was a member of the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.

Fidel Ibáñez represented Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature, belonging to the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.

Answer: True

Fidel Ibáñez served as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 8th Philippine Legislature, affiliated with the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the electoral history of Fidel Ibáñez in the 8th Philippine Legislature?: Fidel Ibáñez was elected to represent Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature on August 24, 1929, to complete the term of Antero Soriano, who had died. Ibáñez was a member of the Nacionalista Party Consolidado and served until June 2, 1931.

Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature, but he was a member of the Nacionalista Party Democrático, not the Demócrata Party.

Answer: True

Francisco Arca's affiliation during his representation of Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature was with the Nacionalista Party Democrático, not the Demócrata Party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature, and what was their party?: Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1934 and served from June 5, 1934, until the legislature's dissolution on September 16, 1935. He was a member of the Nacionalista Party Democrático.

When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?

Answer: 1907

Cavite's at-large district was re-established for the Philippine Assembly on January 9, 1907.

Related Concepts:

  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created on January 9, 1907, for the Philippine Assembly, which was part of the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Regular Batasang Pambansa?: Cavite's at-large district was re-established for the Regular Batasang Pambansa on February 1, 1984.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-created for the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created for the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on May 24, 1945.

Rafael Palma, the first at-large representative for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly, resigned due to what?

Answer: Appointment as a Philippine commissioner

Rafael Palma resigned from his position as the first at-large representative for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly upon his appointment as a Philippine commissioner.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly?: Rafael Palma was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly. He served from October 16, 1907, until July 1, 1908, when he resigned upon his appointment as a Philippine commissioner.
  • What party did Rafael Palma represent during his term in the Philippine Assembly?: Rafael Palma represented the Nacionalista Party during his term as the at-large representative for Cavite in the Philippine Assembly.

Which party did Emiliano Tria Tirona primarily represent during his terms in the Philippine Assembly?

Answer: Nacionalista Party

Emiliano Tria Tirona primarily represented the Nacionalista Party during his terms in the Philippine Assembly.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature?: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature. His term began on October 16, 1916, and concluded on June 3, 1919. He belonged to the Demócrata Party.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature?: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1931 and served from June 2, 1931, to June 5, 1934, representing the Demócrata Party.
  • What was Emiliano Tria Tirona's party affiliation during his service in the Philippine Assembly?: Emiliano Tria Tirona was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party when he was first elected in the special election of 1909 and continued to represent this party after being re-elected in the general election of 1909.

Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature (1912-1916)?

Answer: Florentino Joya

Florentino Joya represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature, serving from 1912 to 1916.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature?: Florentino Joya represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1912 and served his term from October 16, 1912, to October 16, 1916.
  • Who were the four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress?: The four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress were Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca. All were elected in 1898 and served until March 23, 1901.
  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature, and what was their party?: Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1934 and served from June 5, 1934, until the legislature's dissolution on September 16, 1935. He was a member of the Nacionalista Party Democrático.

In which legislative body did Emiliano Tría Tirona represent Cavite as a member of the Demócrata Party?

Answer: 4th Philippine Legislature

Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite as a member of the Demócrata Party during the 4th Philippine Legislature.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature?: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature. His term began on October 16, 1916, and concluded on June 3, 1919. He belonged to the Demócrata Party.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature?: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1931 and served from June 2, 1931, to June 5, 1934, representing the Demócrata Party.
  • How did Emiliano Tria Tirona become a representative for Cavite's at-large district?: Emiliano Tria Tirona was elected to represent Cavite's at-large district in the Philippine Assembly in a special election in 1909 to fill the vacancy left by Rafael Palma. He was subsequently re-elected in the general election of 1909 and served until October 16, 1912.

Who succeeded Emiliano Tría Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature?

Answer: Emilio P. Virata

Emilio P. Virata succeeded Emiliano Tria Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature.

Related Concepts:

  • Who succeeded Emiliano Tría Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature?: Emilio P. Virata succeeded Emiliano Tría Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1919 and served from June 3, 1919, to June 6, 1922, representing the Nacionalista Party.
  • Who were the three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa?: The three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa, serving from July 23, 1984, to March 25, 1986, were Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata. All were members of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature?: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1931 and served from June 2, 1931, to June 5, 1934, representing the Demócrata Party.

What party affiliation did Pedro F. Espiritu have during his representation in the 6th Philippine Legislature?

Answer: Demócrata Party

Pedro F. Espiritu was affiliated with the Demócrata Party during his representation of Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the party affiliation of Pedro F. Espiritu, who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature?: Pedro F. Espiritu represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature as a member of the Demócrata Party. He served from June 6, 1922, to June 2, 1925.

Antero Soriano was elected to the 7th Philippine Legislature to fill a vacancy caused by the death of which representative?

Answer: Augusto A. Reyes

Antero Soriano was elected to the 7th Philippine Legislature to fill a vacancy caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was elected to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes in the 7th Philippine Legislature?: Antero Soriano was elected to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes in the 7th Philippine Legislature. Soriano served from August 15, 1925, to June 15, 1929, and was a member of the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.

Fidel Ibáñez represented Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature and was a member of which party?

Answer: Nacionalista Party Consolidado

Fidel Ibáñez represented Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature as a member of the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the electoral history of Fidel Ibáñez in the 8th Philippine Legislature?: Fidel Ibáñez was elected to represent Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature on August 24, 1929, to complete the term of Antero Soriano, who had died. Ibáñez was a member of the Nacionalista Party Consolidado and served until June 2, 1931.

Which representative served Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature (1931-1934) as a member of the Demócrata Party?

Answer: Emiliano Tria Tirona

Emiliano Tria Tirona served Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature (1931-1934) as a member of the Demócrata Party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature?: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1931 and served from June 2, 1931, to June 5, 1934, representing the Demócrata Party.
  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature, and what was their party?: Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1934 and served from June 5, 1934, until the legislature's dissolution on September 16, 1935. He was a member of the Nacionalista Party Democrático.
  • What was the party affiliation of Pedro F. Espiritu, who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature?: Pedro F. Espiritu represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature as a member of the Demócrata Party. He served from June 6, 1922, to June 2, 1925.

Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature until its dissolution on what date?

Answer: September 16, 1935

Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature until its dissolution on September 16, 1935.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature, and what was their party?: Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature. He was elected in 1934 and served from June 5, 1934, until the legislature's dissolution on September 16, 1935. He was a member of the Nacionalista Party Democrático.

The Commonwealth and Wartime Republics (1935-1946)

Justiniano Montano was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth.

Answer: True

Justiniano Montano holds the distinction of being the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth?: Justiniano Montano was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines. He was elected in 1935 and served until October 11, 1939, representing the Nacionalista Party Democrático.

Justiniano Montano's 1938 election to the 2nd National Assembly was annulled, and Manuel S. Rojas was declared the winner.

Answer: True

The 1938 election for Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd National Assembly resulted in Justiniano Montano's election being annulled, with Manuel S. Rojas subsequently declared the victor.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to Justiniano Montano's election in 1938 for the 2nd National Assembly?: Justiniano Montano was re-elected in 1938 for the 2nd National Assembly of the Commonwealth, but his election was annulled following an electoral protest. Manuel S. Rojas was declared the winner of the 1938 elections.

During the Second Philippine Republic, Cavite sent two representatives at-large, Demetrio B. Encarnación and Luis Y. Ferrer, both affiliated with the KALIBAPI party, not the Nacionalista Party.

Answer: True

The Second Philippine Republic saw Cavite represented by two at-large delegates, Demetrio B. Encarnación and Luis Y. Ferrer, who were members of the KALIBAPI party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic?: During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), Cavite sent two representatives at-large: Demetrio B. Encarnación, who was elected in 1943, and Luis Y. Ferrer, who was appointed as an ex officio member. Both were members of the KALIBAPI party.

Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth after its re-creation in 1945.

Answer: True

Following the re-creation of Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth in 1945, Justiniano Montano served as its representative.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth after its re-creation in 1945?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth from June 9, 1945, to May 25, 1946. He was elected in 1941 and represented the Nacionalista Party.

When was Cavite's at-large district established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?

Answer: 1935

Cavite's at-large district was established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on September 16, 1935.

Related Concepts:

  • When was Cavite's at-large district established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?: Cavite's at-large district was established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on September 16, 1935.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created on January 9, 1907, for the Philippine Assembly, which was part of the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-created for the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created for the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on May 24, 1945.

Justiniano Montano was first elected at-large for Cavite to the Commonwealth's National Assembly in 1935, representing which party?

Answer: Nacionalista Party Democrático

Justiniano Montano was first elected at-large for Cavite to the Commonwealth's National Assembly in 1935, representing the Nacionalista Party Democrático.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth?: Justiniano Montano was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines. He was elected in 1935 and served until October 11, 1939, representing the Nacionalista Party Democrático.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth after its re-creation in 1945?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth from June 9, 1945, to May 25, 1946. He was elected in 1941 and represented the Nacionalista Party.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms, serving in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines. He was first elected in 1957 and re-elected in 1961 and 1965, representing the Nacionalista Party.

Manuel S. Rojas was declared the winner of the 1938 elections for Cavite's at-large district after an electoral protest against whom?

Answer: Justiniano Montano

Manuel S. Rojas was declared the winner of the 1938 elections for Cavite's at-large district following an electoral protest lodged against Justiniano Montano.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Manuel S. Rojas's party affiliation when he represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines?: Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines from December 30, 1949, to December 30, 1953. He was a member of the Liberal Party.

During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), Cavite sent two representatives at-large. What party were they affiliated with?

Answer: KALIBAPI

During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), the two representatives elected at-large for Cavite were affiliated with the KALIBAPI party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic?: During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), Cavite sent two representatives at-large: Demetrio B. Encarnación, who was elected in 1943, and Luis Y. Ferrer, who was appointed as an ex officio member. Both were members of the KALIBAPI party.
  • Which legislative bodies had multiple representatives elected at-large from Cavite?: Cavite elected multiple representatives at-large on three occasions: four representatives for the Malolos Congress (1898-1901), two representatives for the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), and three representatives for the Regular Batasang Pambansa (1984-1986).
  • What was the electoral history of Demetrio B. Encarnación?: Demetrio B. Encarnación was elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic in 1943 and served until February 2, 1944. He was a member of the KALIBAPI party.

Post-War National Legislatures and the Batasang Pambansa (1946-1986)

Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines as a member of the Liberal Party, not the Nacionalista Party.

Answer: True

Manuel S. Rojas, during his tenure representing Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines, was affiliated with the Liberal Party.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Manuel S. Rojas's party affiliation when he represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines?: Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines from December 30, 1949, to December 30, 1953. He was a member of the Liberal Party.

José T. Cajulis represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines as a member of the Nacionalista Party.

Answer: True

José T. Cajulis served as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines, belonging to the Nacionalista Party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines?: José T. Cajulis represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines. He served from December 30, 1953, to December 30, 1957, and was a member of the Nacionalista Party.

Justiniano Montano served in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses, representing the Nacionalista Party, not the Liberal Party.

Answer: True

Justiniano Montano's service in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses was as a representative of the Nacionalista Party, not the Liberal Party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms, serving in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines. He was first elected in 1957 and re-elected in 1961 and 1965, representing the Nacionalista Party.

Justiniano Montano's term in the 7th Congress was cut short by the imposition of martial law.

Answer: True

The term of Justiniano Montano in the 7th Congress was indeed curtailed due to the imposition of martial law.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to the representation of Cavite's at-large district during the 7th Congress of the Philippines?: During the 7th Congress of the Philippines, Justiniano Montano was re-elected in 1969, representing the Liberal Party. However, his term, along with the district's representation, was cut short by the imposition of martial law under Proclamation No. 1081.

The dissolution of Cavite's at-large district led to its replacement by the twenty-seat Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)'s at-large district for the Interim Batasang Pambansa.

Answer: True

The dissolution of Cavite's at-large district led to its replacement by the twenty-seat Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)'s at-large district for the Interim Batasang Pambansa.

Related Concepts:

  • When was Cavite's at-large district dissolved and replaced by regional representation?: Cavite's at-large district was dissolved after the 7th Congress of the Philippines ended in 1972. It was replaced by the twenty-seat Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)'s at-large district for the Interim Batasang Pambansa.

Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata were elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa, but they belonged to the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party, not the Nacionalista Party.

Answer: True

The representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa—Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata—were members of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa?: The three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa, serving from July 23, 1984, to March 25, 1986, were Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata. All were members of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party.

Which representative served Cavite's at-large district in the 1st Congress of the Philippines (1946-1949)?

Answer: Justiniano Montano

Justiniano Montano served as the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 1st Congress of the Philippines (1946-1949).

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic?: During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), Cavite sent two representatives at-large: Demetrio B. Encarnación, who was elected in 1943, and Luis Y. Ferrer, who was appointed as an ex officio member. Both were members of the KALIBAPI party.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-created for the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created for the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on May 24, 1945.
  • How many representatives did Cavite send at-large to the Malolos Congress?: Cavite sent four representatives at-large to the National Assembly of the First Philippine Republic, known as the Malolos Congress, which convened from 1898 to 1901.

Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines (1949-1953) as a member of which party?

Answer: Liberal Party

Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines (1949-1953) as a member of the Liberal Party.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Manuel S. Rojas's party affiliation when he represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines?: Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines from December 30, 1949, to December 30, 1953. He was a member of the Liberal Party.

Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines (1953-1957)?

Answer: José T. Cajulis

José T. Cajulis represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines (1953-1957).

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines?: José T. Cajulis represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines. He served from December 30, 1953, to December 30, 1957, and was a member of the Nacionalista Party.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the National Assembly of the Second Philippine Republic?: During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), Cavite sent two representatives at-large: Demetrio B. Encarnación, who was elected in 1943, and Luis Y. Ferrer, who was appointed as an ex officio member. Both were members of the KALIBAPI party.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms, serving in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines. He was first elected in 1957 and re-elected in 1961 and 1965, representing the Nacionalista Party.

Justiniano Montano was re-elected for the 7th Congress in 1969, representing which party?

Answer: Liberal Party

Justiniano Montano was re-elected for the 7th Congress in 1969, representing the Liberal Party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district for multiple terms, serving in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses of the Philippines. He was first elected in 1957 and re-elected in 1961 and 1965, representing the Nacionalista Party.
  • Who was the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 1st Congress of the Philippines?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district in the 1st Congress of the Philippines, serving from May 25, 1946, to December 30, 1949. He was elected in 1946 and belonged to the Nacionalista Party.
  • Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth after its re-creation in 1945?: Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth from June 9, 1945, to May 25, 1946. He was elected in 1941 and represented the Nacionalista Party.

Cavite's at-large district was dissolved after the 7th Congress and replaced by representation for which region in the Interim Batasang Pambansa?

Answer: Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)

Following the dissolution of Cavite's at-large district after the 7th Congress, representation for the Interim Batasang Pambansa was established for the Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A) region.

Related Concepts:

  • When was Cavite's at-large district dissolved and replaced by regional representation?: Cavite's at-large district was dissolved after the 7th Congress of the Philippines ended in 1972. It was replaced by the twenty-seat Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)'s at-large district for the Interim Batasang Pambansa.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?: Cavite's at-large district was re-created on January 9, 1907, for the Philippine Assembly, which was part of the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Regular Batasang Pambansa?: Cavite's at-large district was re-established for the Regular Batasang Pambansa on February 1, 1984.

Who were the three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa (1984-1986), all members of the KBL party?

Answer: Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, Cesar Virata

Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata were the three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa (1984-1986), all members of the KBL party.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa?: The three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa, serving from July 23, 1984, to March 25, 1986, were Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata. All were members of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party.
  • What was the electoral history of Cesar Virata?: Cesar Virata was elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa in 1984 and served until March 25, 1986. He was a member of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party.
  • What was the electoral history of Renato P. Dragon?: Renato P. Dragon was elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa in 1984 and served until March 25, 1986. He was a member of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party.

The End of At-Large Representation in Cavite

After the dissolution of the Regular Batasang Pambansa, Cavite's representation was divided into distinct congressional districts.

Answer: True

Following the dissolution of the Regular Batasang Pambansa, Cavite's legislative representation transitioned to distinct congressional districts.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to Cavite's representation after the dissolution of the Regular Batasang Pambansa?: After the dissolution of the Regular Batasang Pambansa in 1986, Cavite's representation was divided into distinct congressional districts. Specifically, the province was divided into Cavite's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd congressional districts.

When did Cavite's at-large congressional district officially cease to exist with the creation of distinct districts?

Answer: 1987

Cavite's at-large congressional district officially ceased to exist with the creation of distinct districts on February 2, 1987.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the article, when did Cavite begin electing representatives from distinct congressional districts?: Cavite began electing representatives from distinct congressional districts, specifically its first, second, and third districts, on February 2, 1987. Prior to this, the province had utilized an at-large representation system for various national legislatures.
  • When was Cavite's at-large district established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?: Cavite's at-large district was established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on September 16, 1935.
  • When did Cavite's at-large congressional district cease to exist?: Cavite's at-large congressional district ceased to exist after February 2, 1987, with the creation of Cavite's first, second, and third congressional districts. Prior to this, the province had utilized an at-large representation system for various national legislatures.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy