Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



The Chief Justice of Australia: Role, History, and Appointment

At a Glance

Title: The Chief Justice of Australia: Role, History, and Appointment

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Foundational Aspects and Constitutional Framework: 7 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Functions, Powers, and Remuneration: 5 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Evolution of the Office and Tenure: 2 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Appointment Traditions and Notable Cases: 6 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Profiles of Australian Chief Justices: 17 flashcards, 37 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 37
  • True/False Questions: 37
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 38
  • Total Questions: 75

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The Chief Justice of Australia: Role, History, and Appointment

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Chief Justice of Australia" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The Chief Justice of Australia: Role, History, and Appointment

Study Guide: The Chief Justice of Australia: Role, History, and Appointment

Foundational Aspects and Constitutional Framework

The Chief Justice of Australia holds the highest judicial office in the Commonwealth and presides over the High Court.

Answer: True

The Chief Justice of Australia is the presiding justice of the High Court and holds the highest-ranking judicial office in the Commonwealth, as established by the Constitution.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental role of the Chief Justice of Australia within the Australian legal system?: The Chief Justice of Australia serves as the presiding justice of the High Court of Australia, holding the highest judicial office in the Commonwealth. This position is central to the country's judicial branch, overseeing the highest court in the land.
  • What specific section of the Australian Constitution establishes the office of Chief Justice and the High Court?: The office of Chief Justice and the High Court itself are established under Section 71 of the Constitution of Australia. This section mandates that the High Court consist of a Chief Justice and at least two other justices.

The Governor-General of Australia appoints the Chief Justice based on the advice of the Attorney-General.

Answer: True

The Governor-General of Australia appoints the Chief Justice, acting on the advice of the Attorney-General of Australia.

Related Concepts:

  • Which governmental authority is responsible for appointing the Chief Justice of Australia?: The Chief Justice of Australia is appointed by the Governor-General of Australia, acting on the advice of the Attorney-General of Australia. This process ensures that the appointment is made by the head of state based on the recommendation of the federal government's chief legal officer.
  • Describe the general process by which all justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed.: All Justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed by the Governor-General of Australia. This appointment is made on the advice of the federal government, specifically the Attorney-General, ensuring a governmental recommendation process.

The office of Chief Justice of Australia was formally established in 1901, coinciding with the federation of Australia.

Answer: False

The office of Chief Justice of Australia was formally established on 5 October 1903, not 1901.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the office of Chief Justice of Australia formally established?: The office of Chief Justice of Australia was formally established on 5 October 1903. This date marks the commencement of the High Court's operations and the appointment of its first members.

Section 71 of the Australian Constitution establishes the office of Chief Justice and mandates that the High Court consist of a Chief Justice and at least two other justices.

Answer: True

Section 71 of the Constitution of Australia establishes the office of Chief Justice and mandates the composition of the High Court.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific section of the Australian Constitution establishes the office of Chief Justice and the High Court?: The office of Chief Justice and the High Court itself are established under Section 71 of the Constitution of Australia. This section mandates that the High Court consist of a Chief Justice and at least two other justices.

The High Court's first members were appointed under the Commonwealth Courts Act 1903.

Answer: False

The High Court was constituted by, and its first members were appointed under, the Judiciary Act 1903, not the Commonwealth Courts Act 1903.

Related Concepts:

  • Which legislative act was instrumental in constituting the High Court and appointing its initial members?: The High Court was constituted by, and its first members were appointed under, the Judiciary Act 1903. This Act provided the legislative framework for the establishment and initial operation of Australia's highest court.

All Justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed by the Prime Minister of Australia.

Answer: False

All Justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed by the Governor-General of Australia on the advice of the federal government, specifically the Attorney-General, not the Prime Minister directly.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the general process by which all justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed.: All Justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed by the Governor-General of Australia. This appointment is made on the advice of the federal government, specifically the Attorney-General, ensuring a governmental recommendation process.
  • Which governmental authority is responsible for appointing the Chief Justice of Australia?: The Chief Justice of Australia is appointed by the Governor-General of Australia, acting on the advice of the Attorney-General of Australia. This process ensures that the appointment is made by the head of state based on the recommendation of the federal government's chief legal officer.

A Chief Justice can be removed from office by a simple majority vote in either house of the federal parliament.

Answer: False

A Chief Justice can only be removed from office by the Governor-General, following a request from both houses of the federal parliament, which is a more stringent process than a simple majority vote in one house.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the constitutional mechanism for removing a Chief Justice or any other High Court justice from office?: A Chief Justice or any other High Court justice can only be removed from office by the Governor-General, following a request from both houses of the federal parliament. This is a stringent process designed to ensure judicial independence, and it has never been exercised in Australia's history.

What is the fundamental role of the Chief Justice of Australia within the Australian legal system?

Answer: To act as the highest-ranking judicial officer and presiding justice of the High Court.

The Chief Justice of Australia serves as the presiding justice of the High Court of Australia, making them the highest-ranking judicial officer in the Commonwealth.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental role of the Chief Justice of Australia within the Australian legal system?: The Chief Justice of Australia serves as the presiding justice of the High Court of Australia, holding the highest judicial office in the Commonwealth. This position is central to the country's judicial branch, overseeing the highest court in the land.

Which governmental authority is responsible for appointing the Chief Justice of Australia?

Answer: The Governor-General of Australia, on the advice of the Attorney-General.

The Chief Justice of Australia is appointed by the Governor-General of Australia, acting on the advice of the Attorney-General of Australia.

Related Concepts:

  • Which governmental authority is responsible for appointing the Chief Justice of Australia?: The Chief Justice of Australia is appointed by the Governor-General of Australia, acting on the advice of the Attorney-General of Australia. This process ensures that the appointment is made by the head of state based on the recommendation of the federal government's chief legal officer.
  • Describe the general process by which all justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed.: All Justices of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, are appointed by the Governor-General of Australia. This appointment is made on the advice of the federal government, specifically the Attorney-General, ensuring a governmental recommendation process.

When was the office of Chief Justice of Australia formally established?

Answer: 5 October 1903

The office of Chief Justice of Australia was formally established on 5 October 1903, marking the commencement of the High Court's operations.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the office of Chief Justice of Australia formally established?: The office of Chief Justice of Australia was formally established on 5 October 1903. This date marks the commencement of the High Court's operations and the appointment of its first members.

Which section of the Australian Constitution establishes the office of Chief Justice and the High Court?

Answer: Section 71

Section 71 of the Constitution of Australia establishes the office of Chief Justice and the High Court, mandating its composition.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific section of the Australian Constitution establishes the office of Chief Justice and the High Court?: The office of Chief Justice and the High Court itself are established under Section 71 of the Constitution of Australia. This section mandates that the High Court consist of a Chief Justice and at least two other justices.

Which legislative act was instrumental in constituting the High Court and appointing its initial members?

Answer: The Judiciary Act 1903

The High Court was constituted by, and its first members were appointed under, the Judiciary Act 1903.

Related Concepts:

  • Which legislative act was instrumental in constituting the High Court and appointing its initial members?: The High Court was constituted by, and its first members were appointed under, the Judiciary Act 1903. This Act provided the legislative framework for the establishment and initial operation of Australia's highest court.

What is the constitutional mechanism for removing a Chief Justice or any other High Court justice from office?

Answer: A request from both houses of the federal parliament, followed by action from the Governor-General.

A Chief Justice or any other High Court justice can only be removed from office by the Governor-General, following a request from both houses of the federal parliament.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the constitutional mechanism for removing a Chief Justice or any other High Court justice from office?: A Chief Justice or any other High Court justice can only be removed from office by the Governor-General, following a request from both houses of the federal parliament. This is a stringent process designed to ensure judicial independence, and it has never been exercised in Australia's history.

Functions, Powers, and Remuneration

The official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia is 'Your Honour'.

Answer: False

The official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia is 'The Honourable', not 'Your Honour'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia?: The official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia is 'The Honourable'. This honorific is commonly used for high-ranking judicial and political figures in Australia and other Commonwealth realms.

The annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia, as per the 2024 determination, is over $650,000.

Answer: True

According to the Remuneration Tribunal's 2024 determination, the annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia is $672,630, which is over $650,000.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia, according to the 2024 determination?: According to the Remuneration Tribunal's 2024 determination, the annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia is $672,630. This figure reflects the significant responsibility and prestige associated with the role.

The Chief Justice's primary distinction from other High Court justices is a tie-breaking vote in all court jurisdictions.

Answer: False

The Chief Justice's tie-breaking vote applies only when the court's opinion is evenly divided in its original jurisdiction, not in all court jurisdictions.

Related Concepts:

  • In what specific judicial context is the Chief Justice considered 'first among equals' and possesses a distinct power?: The Chief Justice is considered 'first among equals' among the High Court justices, meaning their position differs little from that of other justices in most respects. However, the one substantial difference is that when the court's opinion is evenly divided in its original jurisdiction (not appellate jurisdiction), the side supported by the Chief Justice prevails. This grants the Chief Justice a tie-breaking vote in specific circumstances.

The Chief Justice's ceremonial duties include acting as the Governor-General's deputy and administering oaths to the Governor-General-designate.

Answer: True

The Chief Justice performs significant ceremonial duties, including acting as the Governor-General's deputy and administering the oath of allegiance and oath of office to the Governor-General-designate.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific oaths does the Chief Justice administer to an incoming Governor-General-designate?: The Chief Justice administers both the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate when they take up their appointment. This is a crucial ceremonial duty that formalizes the Governor-General's assumption of their constitutional responsibilities.
  • Beyond their judicial duties, what significant ceremonial and advisory functions does the Chief Justice perform?: The Chief Justice often acts as the Governor-General's deputy, particularly during ceremonies such as the opening of Parliament after an election. Additionally, the Chief Justice administers the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate when they assume their appointment.

The Chief Justice administers only the oath of allegiance to an incoming Governor-General-designate.

Answer: False

The Chief Justice administers both the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific oaths does the Chief Justice administer to an incoming Governor-General-designate?: The Chief Justice administers both the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate when they take up their appointment. This is a crucial ceremonial duty that formalizes the Governor-General's assumption of their constitutional responsibilities.
  • Beyond their judicial duties, what significant ceremonial and advisory functions does the Chief Justice perform?: The Chief Justice often acts as the Governor-General's deputy, particularly during ceremonies such as the opening of Parliament after an election. Additionally, the Chief Justice administers the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate when they assume their appointment.

What is the official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia?

Answer: The Honourable

The official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia is 'The Honourable'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia?: The official style of address for the Chief Justice of Australia is 'The Honourable'. This honorific is commonly used for high-ranking judicial and political figures in Australia and other Commonwealth realms.

According to the 2024 determination, what is the annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia?

Answer: $672,630

The Remuneration Tribunal's 2024 determination sets the annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia at $672,630.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia, according to the 2024 determination?: According to the Remuneration Tribunal's 2024 determination, the annual salary for the Chief Justice of Australia is $672,630. This figure reflects the significant responsibility and prestige associated with the role.

What is the primary distinction in judicial power for the Chief Justice, making them 'first among equals'?

Answer: The Chief Justice's side prevails if the court's opinion is evenly divided in its original jurisdiction.

The Chief Justice's primary distinction is a tie-breaking vote when the court's opinion is evenly divided in its original jurisdiction.

Related Concepts:

  • In what specific judicial context is the Chief Justice considered 'first among equals' and possesses a distinct power?: The Chief Justice is considered 'first among equals' among the High Court justices, meaning their position differs little from that of other justices in most respects. However, the one substantial difference is that when the court's opinion is evenly divided in its original jurisdiction (not appellate jurisdiction), the side supported by the Chief Justice prevails. This grants the Chief Justice a tie-breaking vote in specific circumstances.

Beyond judicial duties, what significant ceremonial function does the Chief Justice perform regarding the Governor-General?

Answer: Administering the oath of allegiance and oath of office to the Governor-General-designate.

The Chief Justice administers both the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate when they take up their appointment.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific oaths does the Chief Justice administer to an incoming Governor-General-designate?: The Chief Justice administers both the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate when they take up their appointment. This is a crucial ceremonial duty that formalizes the Governor-General's assumption of their constitutional responsibilities.
  • Beyond their judicial duties, what significant ceremonial and advisory functions does the Chief Justice perform?: The Chief Justice often acts as the Governor-General's deputy, particularly during ceremonies such as the opening of Parliament after an election. Additionally, the Chief Justice administers the oath of allegiance and the oath of office to the Governor-General-designate when they assume their appointment.

Evolution of the Office and Tenure

All Chief Justices of Australia have been appointed for life, with no mandatory retirement age ever being introduced.

Answer: False

Prior to 1977, appointments were for life, but a constitutional amendment in that year introduced a mandatory retirement age of 70.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the conditions regarding the term of office for the Chief Justice of Australia, particularly concerning retirement?: There is no set term length for the Chief Justice of Australia; however, retirement is mandatory at the age of 70. Prior to a constitutional amendment in 1977, appointments were for life, but this amendment introduced the compulsory retirement age.

The mandatory retirement age of seventy for High Court justices was introduced in 1977 through a constitutional amendment.

Answer: True

A constitutional amendment in 1977 introduced a mandatory retirement age of seventy for High Court justices, replacing lifetime appointments.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the mandatory retirement age for High Court justices change with the 1977 constitutional amendment?: Before 1977, appointments for High Court justices were for life. However, a constitutional amendment in 1977 introduced a mandatory retirement age of seventy, meaning all appointments since then are until the justice reaches that age.

What is the mandatory retirement age for the Chief Justice of Australia, as established by a constitutional amendment in 1977?

Answer: 70

A constitutional amendment in 1977 introduced a mandatory retirement age of seventy for High Court justices, replacing lifetime appointments.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the conditions regarding the term of office for the Chief Justice of Australia, particularly concerning retirement?: There is no set term length for the Chief Justice of Australia; however, retirement is mandatory at the age of 70. Prior to a constitutional amendment in 1977, appointments were for life, but this amendment introduced the compulsory retirement age.
  • How did the mandatory retirement age for High Court justices change with the 1977 constitutional amendment?: Before 1977, appointments for High Court justices were for life. However, a constitutional amendment in 1977 introduced a mandatory retirement age of seventy, meaning all appointments since then are until the justice reaches that age.

How did the mandatory retirement age for High Court justices change in 1977?

Answer: A mandatory retirement age of seventy was introduced, replacing lifetime appointments.

Before 1977, appointments for High Court justices were for life; a constitutional amendment in 1977 introduced a mandatory retirement age of seventy.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the mandatory retirement age for High Court justices change with the 1977 constitutional amendment?: Before 1977, appointments for High Court justices were for life. However, a constitutional amendment in 1977 introduced a mandatory retirement age of seventy, meaning all appointments since then are until the justice reaches that age.
  • What are the conditions regarding the term of office for the Chief Justice of Australia, particularly concerning retirement?: There is no set term length for the Chief Justice of Australia; however, retirement is mandatory at the age of 70. Prior to a constitutional amendment in 1977, appointments were for life, but this amendment introduced the compulsory retirement age.

Appointment Traditions and Notable Cases

Chief Justice Samuel Griffith established a precedent for the Chief Justice providing constitutional advice to the Governor-General on the exercise of reserve powers.

Answer: True

Chief Justice Samuel Griffith was consulted several times by governors-general on the exercise of their reserve powers, establishing an early precedent for this advisory role.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Chief Justice Samuel Griffith's actions establish a precedent for the Chief Justice's advisory role to the Governor-General?: Chief Justice Samuel Griffith was consulted several times by governors-general on the exercise of their reserve powers. These consultations established an early precedent for the Chief Justice providing constitutional advice to the Governor-General, highlighting the close relationship between the judiciary and the executive in certain circumstances.

During the 1975 constitutional crisis, Chief Justice Garfield Barwick's advice to Governor-General Sir John Kerr was widely praised for upholding the separation of powers.

Answer: False

Chief Justice Garfield Barwick's advice to Governor-General Sir John Kerr during the 1975 constitutional crisis was controversial, particularly because the Prime Minister had refused permission for consultation, raising questions about the separation of powers.

Related Concepts:

  • What notable controversy involved Chief Justice Garfield Barwick and Governor-General Sir John Kerr during the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis?: Chief Justice Garfield Barwick created controversy during the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis when he advised Governor-General Sir John Kerr on the constitutional legality of dismissing a prime minister. This was particularly contentious because the then-Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, had refused Kerr's request for permission to consult Barwick or to act on any advice other than Whitlam's own, raising questions about the separation of powers and appropriate advisory roles.
  • Provide information on Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, including his tenure and previous government position.: Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, served from 27 April 1964 to 11 February 1981, a tenure of 16 years and 9 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, was from New South Wales, and his previous post was Attorney-General of Australia from 1958 to 1964.

A majority of Chief Justices have been appointed directly from outside the High Court, such as from state chief justiceships or private practice.

Answer: False

There is a strong tradition of appointing new Chief Justices from within the existing ranks of the High Court; eight out of fourteen were incumbent puisne justices.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the different types of previous professional roles held by individuals who were appointed as Chief Justice.: Individuals appointed as Chief Justice have held various previous professional roles, including incumbent puisne justices of the High Court, incumbent chief justices of states, and incumbent attorneys-general of Australia. This demonstrates a pathway to the chief justiceship from different high-level legal and governmental positions.
  • What is the strong tradition observed in the appointment of new Chief Justices of Australia?: There is a strong tradition of appointing new Chief Justices from within the existing ranks of the High Court. Out of the fourteen Chief Justices, eight were incumbent puisne (junior) justices on the High Court prior to their elevation.

Individuals appointed as Chief Justice have exclusively held prior roles as either incumbent puisne justices or state chief justices.

Answer: False

Individuals appointed as Chief Justice have held various previous professional roles, including incumbent puisne justices of the High Court, incumbent chief justices of states, and incumbent attorneys-general of Australia. Additionally, one was appointed directly from private practice and another from a lower federal court.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the different types of previous professional roles held by individuals who were appointed as Chief Justice.: Individuals appointed as Chief Justice have held various previous professional roles, including incumbent puisne justices of the High Court, incumbent chief justices of states, and incumbent attorneys-general of Australia. This demonstrates a pathway to the chief justiceship from different high-level legal and governmental positions.

Robert French was unique among Chief Justices for being appointed directly from a lower federal court.

Answer: True

Robert French was uniquely appointed directly to the chief justiceship from a lower federal court, specifically as a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Chief Justice was uniquely appointed directly from a lower federal court, bypassing the High Court's existing ranks or state chief justiceships?: Uniquely, Robert French was appointed directly to the chief justiceship from a lower federal court, specifically as a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia. This was a departure from the more common tradition of appointing from within the High Court or from state chief justices.
  • Describe the tenure and prior federal judicial role of Robert French, the twelfth Chief Justice.: Robert French served as the twelfth Chief Justice from 1 September 2008 to 29 January 2017, a tenure of 8 years and 4 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, was from Western Australia, and his previous post was Judge of the Federal Court of Australia from 1986 to 2008.

Adrian Knox was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private legal practice without any prior judicial experience.

Answer: True

Adrian Knox was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private practice as a barrister, without any prior judicial experience.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private legal practice without prior judicial experience?: Adrian Knox was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private practice as a barrister, without any prior judicial experience. This makes his appointment particularly distinctive in the history of the High Court.
  • Describe the tenure and unique previous professional background of Sir Adrian Knox, the second Chief Justice.: Sir Adrian Knox served as the second Chief Justice from 18 October 1919 to 31 March 1930, a period of 10 years and 5 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Billy Hughes, was from New South Wales, and notably, his previous post was a barrister in private practice, making him the only Chief Justice appointed without prior judicial experience.

Which Chief Justice established an early precedent for providing constitutional advice to the Governor-General on the exercise of reserve powers?

Answer: Sir Samuel Griffith

Chief Justice Samuel Griffith was consulted several times by governors-general on the exercise of their reserve powers, establishing this precedent.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Chief Justice Samuel Griffith's actions establish a precedent for the Chief Justice's advisory role to the Governor-General?: Chief Justice Samuel Griffith was consulted several times by governors-general on the exercise of their reserve powers. These consultations established an early precedent for the Chief Justice providing constitutional advice to the Governor-General, highlighting the close relationship between the judiciary and the executive in certain circumstances.

What was the core of the controversy involving Chief Justice Garfield Barwick during the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis?

Answer: His advice to the Governor-General on dismissing a prime minister, despite the PM's refusal for consultation.

Chief Justice Garfield Barwick's advice to Governor-General Sir John Kerr on dismissing a prime minister was controversial, especially as the Prime Minister had refused permission for consultation.

Related Concepts:

  • What notable controversy involved Chief Justice Garfield Barwick and Governor-General Sir John Kerr during the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis?: Chief Justice Garfield Barwick created controversy during the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis when he advised Governor-General Sir John Kerr on the constitutional legality of dismissing a prime minister. This was particularly contentious because the then-Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, had refused Kerr's request for permission to consult Barwick or to act on any advice other than Whitlam's own, raising questions about the separation of powers and appropriate advisory roles.
  • Provide information on Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, including his tenure and previous government position.: Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, served from 27 April 1964 to 11 February 1981, a tenure of 16 years and 9 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, was from New South Wales, and his previous post was Attorney-General of Australia from 1958 to 1964.

What is a strong tradition observed in the appointment of new Chief Justices of Australia?

Answer: Appointing individuals from within the existing ranks of the High Court.

There is a strong tradition of appointing new Chief Justices from within the existing ranks of the High Court, with eight out of fourteen having been incumbent puisne justices.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the different types of previous professional roles held by individuals who were appointed as Chief Justice.: Individuals appointed as Chief Justice have held various previous professional roles, including incumbent puisne justices of the High Court, incumbent chief justices of states, and incumbent attorneys-general of Australia. This demonstrates a pathway to the chief justiceship from different high-level legal and governmental positions.
  • What is the strong tradition observed in the appointment of new Chief Justices of Australia?: There is a strong tradition of appointing new Chief Justices from within the existing ranks of the High Court. Out of the fourteen Chief Justices, eight were incumbent puisne (junior) justices on the High Court prior to their elevation.

Which of the following is NOT a previous professional role from which individuals have been appointed as Chief Justice?

Answer: Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Individuals appointed as Chief Justice have held roles as puisne justices of the High Court, chief justices of states, and attorneys-general of Australia, but not Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the different types of previous professional roles held by individuals who were appointed as Chief Justice.: Individuals appointed as Chief Justice have held various previous professional roles, including incumbent puisne justices of the High Court, incumbent chief justices of states, and incumbent attorneys-general of Australia. This demonstrates a pathway to the chief justiceship from different high-level legal and governmental positions.

Which Chief Justice was appointed directly from private legal practice without any prior judicial experience?

Answer: Sir Adrian Knox

Adrian Knox was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private practice as a barrister, without any prior judicial experience.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private legal practice without prior judicial experience?: Adrian Knox was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private practice as a barrister, without any prior judicial experience. This makes his appointment particularly distinctive in the history of the High Court.

The strong tradition of appointing new Chief Justices from within the existing ranks of the High Court accounts for how many of the fourteen Chief Justices?

Answer: Eight

Out of the fourteen Chief Justices, eight were incumbent puisne justices on the High Court prior to their elevation, reflecting a strong tradition of internal appointments.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the strong tradition observed in the appointment of new Chief Justices of Australia?: There is a strong tradition of appointing new Chief Justices from within the existing ranks of the High Court. Out of the fourteen Chief Justices, eight were incumbent puisne (junior) justices on the High Court prior to their elevation.

Profiles of Australian Chief Justices

Stephen Gageler became the Chief Justice of Australia in early 2023, making him the thirteenth individual to hold the position.

Answer: False

Stephen Gageler assumed office on 6 November 2023, not early 2023, and he is the fourteenth individual to hold the position, not the thirteenth.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is the current Chief Justice of Australia, and when did their term commence?: Stephen Gageler is the incumbent Chief Justice of Australia, having assumed office on 6 November 2023. He is the fourteenth individual to hold this significant judicial position.
  • Who is the current (fourteenth) Chief Justice, Stephen Gageler, and what was his previous judicial role before his appointment?: The current (fourteenth) Chief Justice is Stephen Gageler, whose tenure began on 6 November 2023 and is ongoing. He was nominated by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, is from New South Wales, and his previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2012 to 2023.

Sir Samuel Griffith was instrumental in the early establishment of the High Court as its inaugural Chief Justice.

Answer: True

Sir Samuel Griffith was the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia and played a pivotal role in the early establishment and functioning of the High Court.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide details about Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice, including his tenure, nominating Prime Minister, state, and previous post.: Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice of Australia, served from 5 October 1903 to 17 October 1919, a tenure of 16 years. He was nominated by Prime Minister Alfred Deakin, hailed from Queensland, and his previous post was Chief Justice of Queensland from 1893 to 1903.
  • Who was the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia?: Sir Samuel Griffith was the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia. He played a pivotal role in the early establishment and functioning of the High Court.

Sir Samuel Griffith served as Chief Justice for over 15 years, having previously been the Chief Justice of Queensland.

Answer: True

Sir Samuel Griffith served for 16 years and was previously Chief Justice of Queensland.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide details about Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice, including his tenure, nominating Prime Minister, state, and previous post.: Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice of Australia, served from 5 October 1903 to 17 October 1919, a tenure of 16 years. He was nominated by Prime Minister Alfred Deakin, hailed from Queensland, and his previous post was Chief Justice of Queensland from 1893 to 1903.

Sir Adrian Knox was nominated by Prime Minister Alfred Deakin and had prior experience as a Justice of the High Court.

Answer: False

Sir Adrian Knox was nominated by Prime Minister Billy Hughes, and he was appointed directly from private practice without any prior judicial experience.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the tenure and unique previous professional background of Sir Adrian Knox, the second Chief Justice.: Sir Adrian Knox served as the second Chief Justice from 18 October 1919 to 31 March 1930, a period of 10 years and 5 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Billy Hughes, was from New South Wales, and notably, his previous post was a barrister in private practice, making him the only Chief Justice appointed without prior judicial experience.
  • Who was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private legal practice without prior judicial experience?: Adrian Knox was the only Chief Justice appointed directly from private practice as a barrister, without any prior judicial experience. This makes his appointment particularly distinctive in the history of the High Court.

Sir Isaac Isaacs served as Chief Justice for a tenure of 9 months, having previously been a Justice of the High Court.

Answer: True

Sir Isaac Isaacs served for 9 months and had previously been a Justice of the High Court.

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Isaac Isaacs, the third Chief Justice.: Sir Isaac Isaacs held the position of Chief Justice for a relatively short tenure, from 2 April 1930 to 21 January 1931, serving for 9 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin, was from Victoria, and his previous judicial experience included serving as a Justice of the High Court from 1906 to 1930 before his elevation.

Sir Frank Gavan Duffy was nominated by Prime Minister Joseph Lyons and served as Chief Justice for over five years.

Answer: False

Sir Frank Gavan Duffy was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin and served for 4 years and 8 months, which is less than five years.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the tenure and previous judicial role of Sir Frank Gavan Duffy, the fourth Chief Justice.: Sir Frank Gavan Duffy served as the fourth Chief Justice from 22 January 1931 to 1 October 1935, a tenure of 4 years and 8 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin, was from Victoria, and had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1913 to 1931.

Sir John Latham's previous role before becoming Chief Justice was Attorney-General of Australia.

Answer: True

Sir John Latham's previous role was Attorney-General of Australia from 1932 to 1934.

Related Concepts:

  • Summarize the tenure and previous government role of Sir John Latham, the fifth Chief Justice.: Sir John Latham served as the fifth Chief Justice from 11 October 1935 to 7 April 1952, a significant tenure of 16 years and 5 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Joseph Lyons, was from Victoria, and his previous role was Attorney-General of Australia from 1932 to 1934.

Sir Owen Dixon served as Chief Justice for nearly 12 years, having been nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies.

Answer: True

Sir Owen Dixon served for 11 years and 11 months (nearly 12 years) and was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Owen Dixon, the sixth Chief Justice?: Sir Owen Dixon served as the sixth Chief Justice from 18 April 1952 to 13 April 1964, a tenure of 11 years and 11 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, was from Victoria, and had extensive prior judicial experience as a Justice of the High Court from 1929 to 1952.

Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser.

Answer: False

Sir Garfield Barwick was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, not Malcolm Fraser.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide information on Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, including his tenure and previous government position.: Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, served from 27 April 1964 to 11 February 1981, a tenure of 16 years and 9 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, was from New South Wales, and his previous post was Attorney-General of Australia from 1958 to 1964.

Sir Harry Gibbs, the eighth Chief Justice, was from Queensland and had served as a Justice of the High Court prior to his elevation.

Answer: True

Sir Harry Gibbs was from Queensland and had served as a Justice of the High Court from 1970 to 1981 before becoming Chief Justice.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Harry Gibbs, the eighth Chief Justice.: Sir Harry Gibbs served as the eighth Chief Justice from 12 February 1981 to 5 February 1987, a tenure of 5 years and 11 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser, was from Queensland, and had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1970 to 1981.

Sir Anthony Mason's tenure as Chief Justice lasted for over 8 years, and he was nominated by Prime Minister Bob Hawke.

Answer: True

Sir Anthony Mason served for 8 years and 2 months and was nominated by Prime Minister Bob Hawke.

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the tenure and previous judicial role of Sir Anthony Mason, the ninth Chief Justice.: Sir Anthony Mason served as the ninth Chief Justice from 6 February 1987 to 20 April 1995, a tenure of 8 years and 2 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Bob Hawke, was from New South Wales, and his previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 1972 to 1987.

Sir Gerard Brennan was the tenth Chief Justice and was nominated by Prime Minister John Howard.

Answer: False

Sir Gerard Brennan was nominated by Prime Minister Paul Keating, not John Howard.

Related Concepts:

  • Summarize the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Gerard Brennan, the tenth Chief Justice.: Sir Gerard Brennan served as the tenth Chief Justice from 21 April 1995 to 21 May 1998, a tenure of 3 years and 1 month. He was nominated by Prime Minister Paul Keating, was from Queensland, and had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1981 to 1995.

Murray Gleeson, the eleventh Chief Justice, previously held the position of Chief Justice of New South Wales.

Answer: True

Murray Gleeson's previous post was Chief Justice of New South Wales from 1988 to 1998.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the tenure and previous state judicial leadership role of Murray Gleeson, the eleventh Chief Justice?: Murray Gleeson served as the eleventh Chief Justice from 22 May 1998 to 29 August 2008, a tenure of 10 years and 3 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister John Howard, was from New South Wales, and his previous post was Chief Justice of New South Wales from 1988 to 1998.

Robert French was the twelfth Chief Justice and was nominated by Prime Minister John Howard.

Answer: False

Robert French was nominated by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, not John Howard.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the tenure and prior federal judicial role of Robert French, the twelfth Chief Justice.: Robert French served as the twelfth Chief Justice from 1 September 2008 to 29 January 2017, a tenure of 8 years and 4 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, was from Western Australia, and his previous post was Judge of the Federal Court of Australia from 1986 to 2008.

Susan Kiefel, the thirteenth Chief Justice, served for over 6 years and was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Answer: True

Susan Kiefel served for 6 years and 9 months and was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide details about Susan Kiefel, the thirteenth Chief Justice, including her tenure and previous judicial role.: Susan Kiefel served as the thirteenth Chief Justice from 30 January 2017 to 5 November 2023, a tenure of 6 years and 9 months. She was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, was from Queensland, and her previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2007 to 2017.

Stephen Gageler, the current Chief Justice, was previously a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia before his appointment.

Answer: False

Stephen Gageler's previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2012 to 2023, not a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is the current Chief Justice of Australia, and when did their term commence?: Stephen Gageler is the incumbent Chief Justice of Australia, having assumed office on 6 November 2023. He is the fourteenth individual to hold this significant judicial position.
  • Who is the current (fourteenth) Chief Justice, Stephen Gageler, and what was his previous judicial role before his appointment?: The current (fourteenth) Chief Justice is Stephen Gageler, whose tenure began on 6 November 2023 and is ongoing. He was nominated by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, is from New South Wales, and his previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2012 to 2023.

Sir John Latham took a leave of absence to serve as Australia's first ambassador to Japan, during which Sir George Rich acted as Chief Justice.

Answer: True

Chief Justice Sir John Latham took a leave of absence from 1940 to 1941 to serve as Australia's first ambassador to Japan, and Sir George Rich served as Acting Chief Justice during this period.

Related Concepts:

  • During which period did Chief Justice Sir John Latham take a leave of absence, and who served as Acting Chief Justice in his stead?: Chief Justice Sir John Latham took a leave of absence from his office from 1940 to 1941 to serve as Australia's first ambassador to Japan. During his absence, Sir George Rich served as the Acting Chief Justice.
  • Summarize the tenure and previous government role of Sir John Latham, the fifth Chief Justice.: Sir John Latham served as the fifth Chief Justice from 11 October 1935 to 7 April 1952, a significant tenure of 16 years and 5 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Joseph Lyons, was from Victoria, and his previous role was Attorney-General of Australia from 1932 to 1934.

Who currently holds the position of Chief Justice of Australia, and when did their term commence?

Answer: Stephen Gageler, 6 November 2023.

Stephen Gageler is the incumbent Chief Justice of Australia, having assumed office on 6 November 2023.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is the current Chief Justice of Australia, and when did their term commence?: Stephen Gageler is the incumbent Chief Justice of Australia, having assumed office on 6 November 2023. He is the fourteenth individual to hold this significant judicial position.
  • Who is the current (fourteenth) Chief Justice, Stephen Gageler, and what was his previous judicial role before his appointment?: The current (fourteenth) Chief Justice is Stephen Gageler, whose tenure began on 6 November 2023 and is ongoing. He was nominated by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, is from New South Wales, and his previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2012 to 2023.

Who was the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia?

Answer: Sir Samuel Griffith

Sir Samuel Griffith was the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia, serving from 1903 to 1919.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia?: Sir Samuel Griffith was the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia. He played a pivotal role in the early establishment and functioning of the High Court.
  • Provide details about Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice, including his tenure, nominating Prime Minister, state, and previous post.: Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice of Australia, served from 5 October 1903 to 17 October 1919, a tenure of 16 years. He was nominated by Prime Minister Alfred Deakin, hailed from Queensland, and his previous post was Chief Justice of Queensland from 1893 to 1903.

Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice, served for a tenure of approximately how many years?

Answer: 16 years

Sir Samuel Griffith served from 5 October 1903 to 17 October 1919, a tenure of 16 years.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide details about Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice, including his tenure, nominating Prime Minister, state, and previous post.: Sir Samuel Griffith, the first Chief Justice of Australia, served from 5 October 1903 to 17 October 1919, a tenure of 16 years. He was nominated by Prime Minister Alfred Deakin, hailed from Queensland, and his previous post was Chief Justice of Queensland from 1893 to 1903.

Who nominated Sir Adrian Knox as the second Chief Justice?

Answer: Prime Minister Billy Hughes

Sir Adrian Knox was nominated by Prime Minister Billy Hughes.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the tenure and unique previous professional background of Sir Adrian Knox, the second Chief Justice.: Sir Adrian Knox served as the second Chief Justice from 18 October 1919 to 31 March 1930, a period of 10 years and 5 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Billy Hughes, was from New South Wales, and notably, his previous post was a barrister in private practice, making him the only Chief Justice appointed without prior judicial experience.

Sir Isaac Isaacs served as Chief Justice for a tenure of how long?

Answer: 9 months

Sir Isaac Isaacs held the position of Chief Justice for 9 months.

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Isaac Isaacs, the third Chief Justice.: Sir Isaac Isaacs held the position of Chief Justice for a relatively short tenure, from 2 April 1930 to 21 January 1931, serving for 9 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin, was from Victoria, and his previous judicial experience included serving as a Justice of the High Court from 1906 to 1930 before his elevation.

Before becoming the fourth Chief Justice, Sir Frank Gavan Duffy had served in what judicial role?

Answer: Justice of the High Court

Sir Frank Gavan Duffy had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1913 to 1931.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the tenure and previous judicial role of Sir Frank Gavan Duffy, the fourth Chief Justice.: Sir Frank Gavan Duffy served as the fourth Chief Justice from 22 January 1931 to 1 October 1935, a tenure of 4 years and 8 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin, was from Victoria, and had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1913 to 1931.

Sir John Latham, the fifth Chief Justice, previously held which government position?

Answer: Attorney-General of Australia

Sir John Latham's previous role was Attorney-General of Australia from 1932 to 1934.

Related Concepts:

  • Summarize the tenure and previous government role of Sir John Latham, the fifth Chief Justice.: Sir John Latham served as the fifth Chief Justice from 11 October 1935 to 7 April 1952, a significant tenure of 16 years and 5 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Joseph Lyons, was from Victoria, and his previous role was Attorney-General of Australia from 1932 to 1934.

Who nominated Sir Owen Dixon as the sixth Chief Justice?

Answer: Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies

Sir Owen Dixon was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Owen Dixon, the sixth Chief Justice?: Sir Owen Dixon served as the sixth Chief Justice from 18 April 1952 to 13 April 1964, a tenure of 11 years and 11 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, was from Victoria, and had extensive prior judicial experience as a Justice of the High Court from 1929 to 1952.

Sir Garfield Barwick served as Chief Justice for approximately how long?

Answer: 16 years and 9 months

Sir Garfield Barwick served from 27 April 1964 to 11 February 1981, a tenure of 16 years and 9 months.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide information on Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, including his tenure and previous government position.: Sir Garfield Barwick, the seventh Chief Justice, served from 27 April 1964 to 11 February 1981, a tenure of 16 years and 9 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, was from New South Wales, and his previous post was Attorney-General of Australia from 1958 to 1964.

From which state did Sir Harry Gibbs, the eighth Chief Justice, hail?

Answer: Queensland

Sir Harry Gibbs was from Queensland.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Harry Gibbs, the eighth Chief Justice.: Sir Harry Gibbs served as the eighth Chief Justice from 12 February 1981 to 5 February 1987, a tenure of 5 years and 11 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser, was from Queensland, and had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1970 to 1981.

Sir Anthony Mason, the ninth Chief Justice, was nominated by which Prime Minister?

Answer: Bob Hawke

Sir Anthony Mason was nominated by Prime Minister Bob Hawke.

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the tenure and previous judicial role of Sir Anthony Mason, the ninth Chief Justice.: Sir Anthony Mason served as the ninth Chief Justice from 6 February 1987 to 20 April 1995, a tenure of 8 years and 2 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Bob Hawke, was from New South Wales, and his previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 1972 to 1987.

What was Sir Gerard Brennan's previous judicial role before becoming the tenth Chief Justice?

Answer: Justice of the High Court

Sir Gerard Brennan had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1981 to 1995.

Related Concepts:

  • Summarize the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Gerard Brennan, the tenth Chief Justice.: Sir Gerard Brennan served as the tenth Chief Justice from 21 April 1995 to 21 May 1998, a tenure of 3 years and 1 month. He was nominated by Prime Minister Paul Keating, was from Queensland, and had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1981 to 1995.

Murray Gleeson, the eleventh Chief Justice, previously held the position of Chief Justice of which state?

Answer: New South Wales

Murray Gleeson's previous post was Chief Justice of New South Wales.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the tenure and previous state judicial leadership role of Murray Gleeson, the eleventh Chief Justice?: Murray Gleeson served as the eleventh Chief Justice from 22 May 1998 to 29 August 2008, a tenure of 10 years and 3 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister John Howard, was from New South Wales, and his previous post was Chief Justice of New South Wales from 1988 to 1998.

Who nominated Robert French as the twelfth Chief Justice?

Answer: Prime Minister Kevin Rudd

Robert French was nominated by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the tenure and prior federal judicial role of Robert French, the twelfth Chief Justice.: Robert French served as the twelfth Chief Justice from 1 September 2008 to 29 January 2017, a tenure of 8 years and 4 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, was from Western Australia, and his previous post was Judge of the Federal Court of Australia from 1986 to 2008.

Susan Kiefel, the thirteenth Chief Justice, served as a Justice of the High Court before her elevation from what year?

Answer: 2007

Susan Kiefel served as a Justice of the High Court from 2007 to 2017 before becoming Chief Justice.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide details about Susan Kiefel, the thirteenth Chief Justice, including her tenure and previous judicial role.: Susan Kiefel served as the thirteenth Chief Justice from 30 January 2017 to 5 November 2023, a tenure of 6 years and 9 months. She was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, was from Queensland, and her previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2007 to 2017.

What was Stephen Gageler's previous judicial role before becoming the current (fourteenth) Chief Justice?

Answer: Justice of the High Court

Stephen Gageler's previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2012 to 2023.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is the current (fourteenth) Chief Justice, Stephen Gageler, and what was his previous judicial role before his appointment?: The current (fourteenth) Chief Justice is Stephen Gageler, whose tenure began on 6 November 2023 and is ongoing. He was nominated by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, is from New South Wales, and his previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2012 to 2023.
  • Who is the current Chief Justice of Australia, and when did their term commence?: Stephen Gageler is the incumbent Chief Justice of Australia, having assumed office on 6 November 2023. He is the fourteenth individual to hold this significant judicial position.

During Sir John Latham's leave of absence from 1940 to 1941, who served as Acting Chief Justice?

Answer: Sir George Rich

During Sir John Latham's leave of absence from 1940 to 1941, Sir George Rich served as the Acting Chief Justice.

Related Concepts:

  • During which period did Chief Justice Sir John Latham take a leave of absence, and who served as Acting Chief Justice in his stead?: Chief Justice Sir John Latham took a leave of absence from his office from 1940 to 1941 to serve as Australia's first ambassador to Japan. During his absence, Sir George Rich served as the Acting Chief Justice.
  • Summarize the tenure and previous government role of Sir John Latham, the fifth Chief Justice.: Sir John Latham served as the fifth Chief Justice from 11 October 1935 to 7 April 1952, a significant tenure of 16 years and 5 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister Joseph Lyons, was from Victoria, and his previous role was Attorney-General of Australia from 1932 to 1934.

Sir Isaac Isaacs was nominated as the third Chief Justice by which Prime Minister?

Answer: James Scullin

Sir Isaac Isaacs was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin.

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the tenure and prior judicial experience of Sir Isaac Isaacs, the third Chief Justice.: Sir Isaac Isaacs held the position of Chief Justice for a relatively short tenure, from 2 April 1930 to 21 January 1931, serving for 9 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin, was from Victoria, and his previous judicial experience included serving as a Justice of the High Court from 1906 to 1930 before his elevation.

Sir Frank Gavan Duffy's tenure as Chief Justice lasted for how long?

Answer: 4 years and 8 months

Sir Frank Gavan Duffy served as Chief Justice for 4 years and 8 months.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the tenure and previous judicial role of Sir Frank Gavan Duffy, the fourth Chief Justice.: Sir Frank Gavan Duffy served as the fourth Chief Justice from 22 January 1931 to 1 October 1935, a tenure of 4 years and 8 months. He was nominated by Prime Minister James Scullin, was from Victoria, and had previously served as a Justice of the High Court from 1913 to 1931.

Susan Kiefel was nominated as the thirteenth Chief Justice by which Prime Minister?

Answer: Malcolm Turnbull

Susan Kiefel was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide details about Susan Kiefel, the thirteenth Chief Justice, including her tenure and previous judicial role.: Susan Kiefel served as the thirteenth Chief Justice from 30 January 2017 to 5 November 2023, a tenure of 6 years and 9 months. She was nominated by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, was from Queensland, and her previous judicial role was a Justice of the High Court from 2007 to 2017.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy