Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



Foundations of Christology

At a Glance

Title: Foundations of Christology

Total Categories: 7

Category Stats

  • Foundations of Christology: 3 flashcards, 5 questions
  • Early Christian Titles and Concepts: 6 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Historical Development and Councils: 9 flashcards, 18 questions
  • Key Christological Doctrines: 8 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Christological Models and Theologians: 16 flashcards, 31 questions
  • Atonement Theories: 7 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Intersections with Other Doctrines: 1 flashcards, 3 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 50
  • True/False Questions: 55
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 39
  • Total Questions: 94

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Foundations of Christology

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Christology" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Foundations of Christology

Study Guide: Foundations of Christology

Foundations of Christology

Christology is exclusively concerned with the historical Jesus and his ethical teachings, disregarding his divine attributes.

Answer: False

Christology encompasses the study of Jesus Christ's nature, person, and work, including both his historical existence and his divine attributes.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.
  • What are the central questions addressed by Christology regarding Jesus's nature?: Christology grapples with fundamental questions about Jesus's identity, such as whether he was solely human, solely divine, or both human and divine. It also explores the relationship between these two natures and their union within a single person.
  • What is meant by 'Christology from above' or 'high Christology'?: High Christology, also known as Christology from above, emphasizes Jesus's divine attributes, including his pre-existence as the Logos and his divine titles like 'Son of God'. This approach interprets his earthly works through the lens of his divinity.

The term 'Christology' originates from Greek words meaning 'study of the anointed one'.

Answer: True

The term 'Christology' derives from the Greek words 'khristos' (anointed one) and '-logia' (study or discourse), signifying the study of Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'Christology' literally mean, based on its Greek roots?: The term 'Christology' originates from the Greek words 'khristos' (anointed one) and '-logia' (study or discourse). Literally, it means 'the study of Christ' or 'the understanding of Christ'.
  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.
  • What are the central questions addressed by Christology regarding Jesus's nature?: Christology grapples with fundamental questions about Jesus's identity, such as whether he was solely human, solely divine, or both human and divine. It also explores the relationship between these two natures and their union within a single person.

The term 'Christology' originates from Greek words meaning 'study of the human nature'.

Answer: False

The term 'Christology' originates from the Greek words 'khristos' (anointed one) and '-logia' (study or discourse), meaning 'the study of Christ'.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'Christology' literally mean, based on its Greek roots?: The term 'Christology' originates from the Greek words 'khristos' (anointed one) and '-logia' (study or discourse). Literally, it means 'the study of Christ' or 'the understanding of Christ'.
  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.
  • What are the central questions addressed by Christology regarding Jesus's nature?: Christology grapples with fundamental questions about Jesus's identity, such as whether he was solely human, solely divine, or both human and divine. It also explores the relationship between these two natures and their union within a single person.

What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?

Answer: The study of Jesus Christ's nature, person, and work, including his divinity and humanity.

Christology is the theological discipline dedicated to understanding the person, nature, and work of Jesus Christ, encompassing his divine and human dimensions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.
  • What are the central questions addressed by Christology regarding Jesus's nature?: Christology grapples with fundamental questions about Jesus's identity, such as whether he was solely human, solely divine, or both human and divine. It also explores the relationship between these two natures and their union within a single person.
  • How are ontological, functional, and soteriological Christologies distinguished?: Ontological Christology analyzes the fundamental nature or being of Jesus Christ. Functional Christology examines his works and actions, while soteriological Christology focuses on his role and significance in salvation.

What does the Greek root '-logia' in 'Christology' signify?

Answer: Study or discourse

The Greek suffix '-logia' signifies 'study' or 'discourse,' indicating that Christology is the systematic study of Jesus Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'Christology' literally mean, based on its Greek roots?: The term 'Christology' originates from the Greek words 'khristos' (anointed one) and '-logia' (study or discourse). Literally, it means 'the study of Christ' or 'the understanding of Christ'.
  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.
  • What are the central questions addressed by Christology regarding Jesus's nature?: Christology grapples with fundamental questions about Jesus's identity, such as whether he was solely human, solely divine, or both human and divine. It also explores the relationship between these two natures and their union within a single person.

Early Christian Titles and Concepts

Early Christian titles for Jesus, such as Son of Man and Son of God, were derived from Hebrew scripture.

Answer: True

Titles like 'Son of Man' and 'Son of God,' used for Jesus in early Christian writings, have roots and parallels within Hebrew scripture.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the source, what were some of the earliest titles given to Jesus in Christian writings?: The earliest Christian writings bestowed several titles upon Jesus, drawing from Hebrew scripture. These included Son of Man, Son of God, Messiah, and the Greek term Kyrios (Lord).
  • What were the two opposing themes that early Christian titles for Jesus centered around?: Early Christian titles for Jesus generally revolved around two main themes: one portraying Jesus as a pre-existent divine figure who became human and returned to God, and the other, known as adoptionism, suggesting Jesus was a human adopted by God at a significant point in his life, such as his baptism or resurrection.

The title 'Kyrios' (Lord) is significant because it translates the Tetragrammaton, the holy name of God, in the Septuagint.

Answer: True

The Greek title 'Kyrios' (Lord) is significant as it translates the Tetragrammaton (YHWH), the sacred name of God in the Septuagint, thereby associating Jesus with divine authority.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the title 'Kyrios' in New Testament Christology?: The title 'Kyrios' (Lord) is central to New Testament Christology because in the Septuagint, it translates the Tetragrammaton, the holy name of God. Using this title for Jesus closely links him with God, implying divine status and lordship over the world.

The Synoptic Gospels primarily emphasize Jesus's divinity, identifying him as the pre-existent Logos.

Answer: False

The Synoptic Gospels tend to emphasize Jesus's humanity and earthly ministry, while the Gospel of John prominently identifies Jesus with the pre-existent Logos.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John differ in their Christological emphasis?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) generally emphasize the humanity of Jesus, focusing on his teachings, parables, and miracles. In contrast, the Gospel of John places a strong emphasis on Jesus's divinity, identifying him as the pre-existent Logos, the divine Word made flesh.
  • What is the concept of the 'pre-existence of Christ'?: The pre-existence of Christ is the theological idea that Jesus existed before his earthly incarnation. This concept is rooted in Jewish thought and is particularly evident in the Gospel of John, where Jesus is identified with the eternal Logos.

The 'Angel of the Lord' in the Old Testament is interpreted by some as manifestations of the post-incarnate Christ.

Answer: False

Interpretations of the 'Angel of the Lord' in the Old Testament vary, but some theologians consider these appearances as pre-incarnate manifestations of Christ, not post-incarnate.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Angel of the Lord' in Old Testament Christophany discussions?: Some theologians interpret the 'Angel of the Lord' appearances in the Old Testament as Christophanies, meaning manifestations of the pre-incarnate Christ. This view suggests that these divine appearances were not merely angelic but were prefigurations of Jesus himself.

The Gospel of John emphasizes Jesus's humanity and earthly ministry more than his divinity.

Answer: False

The Gospel of John places a significant emphasis on Jesus's divinity, identifying him with the pre-existent Logos, often more so than his humanity and earthly ministry.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John differ in their Christological emphasis?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) generally emphasize the humanity of Jesus, focusing on his teachings, parables, and miracles. In contrast, the Gospel of John places a strong emphasis on Jesus's divinity, identifying him as the pre-existent Logos, the divine Word made flesh.

The concept of the pre-existence of Christ is particularly evident in the Gospel of John, identifying Jesus with the eternal Logos.

Answer: True

The concept of Christ's pre-existence, particularly his identification with the eternal Logos, is a prominent theme in the Gospel of John.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the concept of the 'pre-existence of Christ'?: The pre-existence of Christ is the theological idea that Jesus existed before his earthly incarnation. This concept is rooted in Jewish thought and is particularly evident in the Gospel of John, where Jesus is identified with the eternal Logos.
  • How did the Alexandrian and Antiochian schools of thought differ in their Christological approaches?: The Alexandrian school, influenced by the Gospel of John, viewed Jesus Christ as the eternal Logos who possessed unity with the Father prior to the Incarnation. In contrast, the Antiochian school emphasized Christ as a distinct, unified human person, separate from his divine relationship.

Which of the following was NOT among the earliest titles given to Jesus in Christian writings, according to the source?

Answer: Savior

While titles like Son of Man, Son of God, Messiah, and Kyrios (Lord) are noted as early, 'Savior' is not explicitly listed among the earliest titles derived from Hebrew scripture in the provided context.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the source, what were some of the earliest titles given to Jesus in Christian writings?: The earliest Christian writings bestowed several titles upon Jesus, drawing from Hebrew scripture. These included Son of Man, Son of God, Messiah, and the Greek term Kyrios (Lord).
  • What were the two opposing themes that early Christian titles for Jesus centered around?: Early Christian titles for Jesus generally revolved around two main themes: one portraying Jesus as a pre-existent divine figure who became human and returned to God, and the other, known as adoptionism, suggesting Jesus was a human adopted by God at a significant point in his life, such as his baptism or resurrection.
  • What is the significance of the title 'Kyrios' in New Testament Christology?: The title 'Kyrios' (Lord) is central to New Testament Christology because in the Septuagint, it translates the Tetragrammaton, the holy name of God. Using this title for Jesus closely links him with God, implying divine status and lordship over the world.

The title 'Kyrios' (Lord) is significant in New Testament Christology because it:

Answer: Translates the Tetragrammaton (God's holy name) in the Septuagint.

The title 'Kyrios' is significant as it translates the Tetragrammaton (God's holy name) in the Septuagint, thereby linking Jesus to divine status and lordship.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the title 'Kyrios' in New Testament Christology?: The title 'Kyrios' (Lord) is central to New Testament Christology because in the Septuagint, it translates the Tetragrammaton, the holy name of God. Using this title for Jesus closely links him with God, implying divine status and lordship over the world.
  • According to the source, what were some of the earliest titles given to Jesus in Christian writings?: The earliest Christian writings bestowed several titles upon Jesus, drawing from Hebrew scripture. These included Son of Man, Son of God, Messiah, and the Greek term Kyrios (Lord).

How are the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John distinguished in their Christological emphasis?

Answer: Synoptics emphasize humanity; John emphasizes divinity.

The Synoptic Gospels tend to focus more on Jesus's humanity and earthly ministry, whereas the Gospel of John prominently emphasizes his divinity and pre-existence as the Logos.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John differ in their Christological emphasis?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) generally emphasize the humanity of Jesus, focusing on his teachings, parables, and miracles. In contrast, the Gospel of John places a strong emphasis on Jesus's divinity, identifying him as the pre-existent Logos, the divine Word made flesh.

Historical Development and Councils

The adoptionist theme in early Christology suggested Jesus was a divine being who became human.

Answer: False

Adoptionism was an early Christological view that posited Jesus was a human being who was divinely 'adopted' by God at a significant point in his life, rather than being divine from conception.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the two opposing themes that early Christian titles for Jesus centered around?: Early Christian titles for Jesus generally revolved around two main themes: one portraying Jesus as a pre-existent divine figure who became human and returned to God, and the other, known as adoptionism, suggesting Jesus was a human adopted by God at a significant point in his life, such as his baptism or resurrection.
  • What is the 'evolutionary model' of Christology development?: The 'evolutionary model' suggests that the Christological understanding of Jesus developed over time, starting with a 'low' or adoptionist view (Jesus as a human exalted by God) and gradually evolving towards a 'high' or incarnation Christology (Jesus as pre-existent and divine). This model was notably proposed by Wilhelm Bousset.

The prevailing scholarly view prior to 2007 was that the divinity of Christ was a late development in Christian thought.

Answer: True

Prior to approximately 2007, a significant scholarly consensus held that the concept of Christ's divinity emerged later in Christian history, but this view has been increasingly challenged.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the scholarly consensus regarding the development of Christ's divinity?: Prior to 2007, the prevailing scholarly view was that the divinity of Christ was a later development. However, most scholars now argue that a high Christology, emphasizing Jesus's divine aspects, existed even before the writings of Paul.
  • What is the counter-argument to the 'evolutionary model' of Christology?: Counter-arguments, often termed 'Explosion Theories' or the 'big-bang theory of Christology', propose that a high Christology, recognizing Jesus's divinity and pre-existence, was present from the very beginning of Christianity. Scholars like Larry Hurtado and Richard Bauckham support this view, citing early devotional practices directed towards Jesus.

The 'evolutionary model' of Christology development suggests a gradual shift from a high Christology to a low Christology.

Answer: False

The 'evolutionary model' suggests a development from an initial 'low' Christology (emphasizing Jesus's humanity) towards a 'high' Christology (emphasizing his divinity).

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'evolutionary model' of Christology development?: The 'evolutionary model' suggests that the Christological understanding of Jesus developed over time, starting with a 'low' or adoptionist view (Jesus as a human exalted by God) and gradually evolving towards a 'high' or incarnation Christology (Jesus as pre-existent and divine). This model was notably proposed by Wilhelm Bousset.
  • What is the starting point for 'Christology from below' or 'low Christology'?: Low Christology, or Christology from below, begins by examining the human aspects of Jesus's life and ministry, such as his teachings and miracles. It then moves towards understanding his divinity and the mystery of the Incarnation.
  • What is meant by 'Christology from above' or 'high Christology'?: High Christology, also known as Christology from above, emphasizes Jesus's divine attributes, including his pre-existence as the Logos and his divine titles like 'Son of God'. This approach interprets his earthly works through the lens of his divinity.

The 'big-bang theory of Christology' posits that a high Christology was present from the very beginning of Christianity.

Answer: True

The 'big-bang theory of Christology' proposes that a high Christology, recognizing Jesus's divinity, was present from the earliest stages of Christianity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the counter-argument to the 'evolutionary model' of Christology?: Counter-arguments, often termed 'Explosion Theories' or the 'big-bang theory of Christology', propose that a high Christology, recognizing Jesus's divinity and pre-existence, was present from the very beginning of Christianity. Scholars like Larry Hurtado and Richard Bauckham support this view, citing early devotional practices directed towards Jesus.
  • What is the scholarly consensus regarding the development of Christ's divinity?: Prior to 2007, the prevailing scholarly view was that the divinity of Christ was a later development. However, most scholars now argue that a high Christology, emphasizing Jesus's divine aspects, existed even before the writings of Paul.
  • What is meant by 'Christology from above' or 'high Christology'?: High Christology, also known as Christology from above, emphasizes Jesus's divine attributes, including his pre-existence as the Logos and his divine titles like 'Son of God'. This approach interprets his earthly works through the lens of his divinity.

The First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) affirmed that the Son was 'homoousios' (of the same being) as the Father.

Answer: True

Both the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) affirmed the Son's consubstantiality with the Father, using the term 'homoousios'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) regarding Christology?: These councils defined the relationship within the Godhead, affirming that the Son was 'homoousios' (of the same being) as the Father. The Nicene Creed, ratified at Constantinople, declared the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus.
  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.

The Council of Ephesus (431) condemned Nestorianism and affirmed a view that led to schisms with the Church of the East.

Answer: True

The Council of Ephesus in 431 condemned Nestorianism, a Christological position that contributed to later schisms, particularly with the Church of the East.

Related Concepts:

  • What controversy did the First Council of Ephesus (431) address, and what was its Christological outcome?: The Council of Ephesus primarily addressed issues related to the title 'Theotokos' (God-bearer) for Mary, stemming from debates initiated by Nestorius. Christologically, it debated miaphysitism versus dyophysitism and ultimately condemned Nestorianism, affirming a view that led to schisms, particularly with the Church of the East.

The Second Council of Constantinople in 553 condemned Monothelitism.

Answer: False

The Second Council of Constantinople in 553 focused on interpreting Chalcedonian decrees and condemning certain teachings, but Monothelitism was condemned later at the Third Council of Constantinople.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the main Christological debate addressed by the Second Council of Constantinople in 553?: The Second Council of Constantinople in 553 interpreted and further explained the decrees of Chalcedon concerning the relationship between Christ's two natures. It also condemned certain teachings attributed to Origen, including those on the pre-existence of the soul.
  • What doctrine did the Third Council of Constantinople (681) condemn?: The Third Council of Constantinople condemned Monothelitism, a doctrine that proposed Christ had only one will, despite having two natures. The council affirmed that Christ possessed two wills—one divine and one human—with the divine will guiding the human will.

The Third Council of Constantinople (681) affirmed that Christ possessed two wills, one divine and one human.

Answer: True

The Third Council of Constantinople (681) affirmed that Christ, possessing two natures, also possessed two distinct wills, one divine and one human, with the human will subordinate to the divine.

Related Concepts:

  • What doctrine did the Third Council of Constantinople (681) condemn?: The Third Council of Constantinople condemned Monothelitism, a doctrine that proposed Christ had only one will, despite having two natures. The council affirmed that Christ possessed two wills—one divine and one human—with the divine will guiding the human will.
  • What was the main Christological debate addressed by the Second Council of Constantinople in 553?: The Second Council of Constantinople in 553 interpreted and further explained the decrees of Chalcedon concerning the relationship between Christ's two natures. It also condemned certain teachings attributed to Origen, including those on the pre-existence of the soul.
  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.

The Second Council of Nicaea (787) affirmed the veneration of icons and related it to the Incarnation.

Answer: True

The Second Council of Nicaea (787) affirmed the veneration of icons, linking this practice to the Incarnation and the possibility of depicting Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the Second Council of Nicaea (787) in relation to Christology?: The Second Council of Nicaea affirmed the veneration of icons, often referred to as the 'Triumph of Orthodoxy.' While not directly defining Christ's natures, its affirmation of icons relates to the veneration of Christ's image and the Incarnation.

The Nicene Creed, ratified at Constantinople, declared the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus.

Answer: True

The Nicene Creed, finalized at the Council of Constantinople (381), affirmed both the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) regarding Christology?: These councils defined the relationship within the Godhead, affirming that the Son was 'homoousios' (of the same being) as the Father. The Nicene Creed, ratified at Constantinople, declared the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus.

The Second Council of Nicaea (787) affirmed the veneration of icons, often referred to as the 'Triumph of Orthodoxy'.

Answer: True

The Second Council of Nicaea (787) affirmed the veneration of icons, linking this practice to the Incarnation and the possibility of depicting Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the Second Council of Nicaea (787) in relation to Christology?: The Second Council of Nicaea affirmed the veneration of icons, often referred to as the 'Triumph of Orthodoxy.' While not directly defining Christ's natures, its affirmation of icons relates to the veneration of Christ's image and the Incarnation.

What does the adoptionist theme in early Christology suggest about Jesus?

Answer: Jesus was a human adopted by God at a significant point in his life.

Adoptionism posits that Jesus was a human being who was divinely adopted by God, often at his baptism or resurrection, thereby receiving divine status.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the two opposing themes that early Christian titles for Jesus centered around?: Early Christian titles for Jesus generally revolved around two main themes: one portraying Jesus as a pre-existent divine figure who became human and returned to God, and the other, known as adoptionism, suggesting Jesus was a human adopted by God at a significant point in his life, such as his baptism or resurrection.

What was the prevailing scholarly view regarding Christ's divinity prior to 2007?

Answer: It was a later development influenced by Greek philosophy.

Prior to 2007, many scholars believed that the doctrine of Christ's divinity was a later development, influenced by Hellenistic philosophy, but this view has been increasingly challenged.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the scholarly consensus regarding the development of Christ's divinity?: Prior to 2007, the prevailing scholarly view was that the divinity of Christ was a later development. However, most scholars now argue that a high Christology, emphasizing Jesus's divine aspects, existed even before the writings of Paul.

The 'evolutionary model' of Christology development suggests:

Answer: A development from a low or adoptionist view towards a high Christology.

The 'evolutionary model' suggests a development from an initial 'low' Christology (emphasizing Jesus's humanity) towards a 'high' Christology (emphasizing his divinity).

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'evolutionary model' of Christology development?: The 'evolutionary model' suggests that the Christological understanding of Jesus developed over time, starting with a 'low' or adoptionist view (Jesus as a human exalted by God) and gradually evolving towards a 'high' or incarnation Christology (Jesus as pre-existent and divine). This model was notably proposed by Wilhelm Bousset.

Which of the following is a key outcome of the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) regarding Christology?

Answer: Affirmation of the Son being 'homoousios' (of the same being) as the Father.

These councils affirmed the Son's consubstantiality with the Father ('homoousios') and established foundational doctrines regarding Christ's divinity and humanity.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) regarding Christology?: These councils defined the relationship within the Godhead, affirming that the Son was 'homoousios' (of the same being) as the Father. The Nicene Creed, ratified at Constantinople, declared the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus.
  • What is the significance of the Second Council of Nicaea (787) in relation to Christology?: The Second Council of Nicaea affirmed the veneration of icons, often referred to as the 'Triumph of Orthodoxy.' While not directly defining Christ's natures, its affirmation of icons relates to the veneration of Christ's image and the Incarnation.
  • What was the main Christological debate addressed by the Second Council of Constantinople in 553?: The Second Council of Constantinople in 553 interpreted and further explained the decrees of Chalcedon concerning the relationship between Christ's two natures. It also condemned certain teachings attributed to Origen, including those on the pre-existence of the soul.

The Council of Ephesus (431) primarily addressed issues related to which title for Mary?

Answer: Mother of God (Theotokos)

The Council of Ephesus (431) addressed controversies surrounding the title 'Theotokos' (God-bearer) for Mary, affirming its appropriateness in relation to Christ's divine nature.

Related Concepts:

  • What controversy did the First Council of Ephesus (431) address, and what was its Christological outcome?: The Council of Ephesus primarily addressed issues related to the title 'Theotokos' (God-bearer) for Mary, stemming from debates initiated by Nestorius. Christologically, it debated miaphysitism versus dyophysitism and ultimately condemned Nestorianism, affirming a view that led to schisms, particularly with the Church of the East.

What doctrine did the Third Council of Constantinople (681) condemn?

Answer: Monothelitism

The Third Council of Constantinople condemned Monothelitism, the doctrine asserting Christ had only one will, affirming instead two wills (divine and human) in Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What doctrine did the Third Council of Constantinople (681) condemn?: The Third Council of Constantinople condemned Monothelitism, a doctrine that proposed Christ had only one will, despite having two natures. The council affirmed that Christ possessed two wills—one divine and one human—with the divine will guiding the human will.

What is the significance of the Second Council of Nicaea (787) in relation to Christology?

Answer: It affirmed the veneration of icons and related it to the Incarnation.

The Second Council of Nicaea (787) affirmed the veneration of icons, linking this practice to the Incarnation and the possibility of depicting Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the Second Council of Nicaea (787) in relation to Christology?: The Second Council of Nicaea affirmed the veneration of icons, often referred to as the 'Triumph of Orthodoxy.' While not directly defining Christ's natures, its affirmation of icons relates to the veneration of Christ's image and the Incarnation.
  • What was the main Christological debate addressed by the Second Council of Constantinople in 553?: The Second Council of Constantinople in 553 interpreted and further explained the decrees of Chalcedon concerning the relationship between Christ's two natures. It also condemned certain teachings attributed to Origen, including those on the pre-existence of the soul.
  • What was the outcome of the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) regarding Christology?: These councils defined the relationship within the Godhead, affirming that the Son was 'homoousios' (of the same being) as the Father. The Nicene Creed, ratified at Constantinople, declared the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus.

Key Christological Doctrines

The Council of Chalcedon in 451 defined Christ as having one nature, a union of the divine and human.

Answer: False

The Council of Chalcedon (451) defined Christ as having two distinct natures, divine and human, united in one person without confusion or division (the hypostatic union).

Related Concepts:

  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • What was the central teaching of the Council of Chalcedon (451) concerning Christ's natures?: The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the dyophysite understanding of the hypostatic union, defining that Christ has two distinct and complete natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition became a reference point for many subsequent Christologies.
  • How did the Council of Chalcedon's definition impact the unity of the early Church?: While the Chalcedonian definition clarified Christology for many, it led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.

The Oriental Orthodox Churches accepted the Chalcedonian definition of Christ's two natures.

Answer: False

The Oriental Orthodox Churches rejected the Chalcedonian definition, adhering to Miaphysitism, which posits a single, unified nature of Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Christian traditions rejected the Chalcedonian definition of Christ's natures?: The Oriental Orthodox Churches rejected the Chalcedonian definition, adhering instead to Miaphysitism, which posits that the divine and human natures unite into a single, composite nature. This position was affirmed by the Second Council of Ephesus.
  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • How did the Council of Chalcedon's definition impact the unity of the early Church?: While the Chalcedonian definition clarified Christology for many, it led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.

The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the miaphysite understanding of the hypostatic union.

Answer: False

The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the dyophysite understanding of the hypostatic union, affirming two natures in one person, which was rejected by Miaphysite traditions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the central teaching of the Council of Chalcedon (451) concerning Christ's natures?: The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the dyophysite understanding of the hypostatic union, defining that Christ has two distinct and complete natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition became a reference point for many subsequent Christologies.
  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • How did the Council of Chalcedon's definition impact the unity of the early Church?: While the Chalcedonian definition clarified Christology for many, it led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.

The 'extra calvinisticum' suggests Christ's divine nature was limited by his human nature after the Incarnation.

Answer: False

The 'extra calvinisticum' is a theological concept asserting that Christ's divine nature is not limited by his human nature, meaning the divine attributes remain infinite and omnipresent.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'extra calvinisticum'?: The 'extra calvinisticum' is a concept within Calvinist theology that states that while Christ's divine nature is united with his human nature, the divine nature is not limited or contained by the human nature. In essence, the divine nature of Christ remains infinite and omnipresent even after the Incarnation.

The Council of Chalcedon's definition of the hypostatic union led to greater unity among all early Christian traditions.

Answer: False

While the Chalcedonian definition clarified Christology for many, it led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.

Related Concepts:

  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • What was the central teaching of the Council of Chalcedon (451) concerning Christ's natures?: The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the dyophysite understanding of the hypostatic union, defining that Christ has two distinct and complete natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition became a reference point for many subsequent Christologies.
  • How did the Council of Chalcedon's definition impact the unity of the early Church?: While the Chalcedonian definition clarified Christology for many, it led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.

Article 10 of the Belgic Confession emphasizes the eternal generation of the Son and his co-essential nature with the Father.

Answer: True

Article 10 of the Belgic Confession aligns with Nicene orthodoxy by emphasizing the eternal generation of the Son and his co-essential, co-eternal nature with the Father.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of Article 10 of the Belgic Confession regarding Christology?: Article 10 of the Belgic Confession aligns with Nicene orthodoxy concerning Christ's deity. It emphasizes the eternal generation of the Son and his co-essential and co-eternal nature with the Father, affirming his role as Creator.

The Council of Chalcedon affirmed that Christ possesses two natures united in one person without confusion or division.

Answer: True

The Council of Chalcedon (451) affirmed the hypostatic union, stating Christ possesses two natures (divine and human) united in one person without confusion or division.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the central teaching of the Council of Chalcedon (451) concerning Christ's natures?: The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the dyophysite understanding of the hypostatic union, defining that Christ has two distinct and complete natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition became a reference point for many subsequent Christologies.
  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • How did the Council of Chalcedon's definition impact the unity of the early Church?: While the Chalcedonian definition clarified Christology for many, it led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.

The 'extra calvinisticum' is a concept that limits Christ's divine nature to his human nature.

Answer: False

The 'extra calvinisticum' posits that Christ's divine nature is not limited by his human nature, maintaining its infinite and omnipresent qualities.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'extra calvinisticum'?: The 'extra calvinisticum' is a concept within Calvinist theology that states that while Christ's divine nature is united with his human nature, the divine nature is not limited or contained by the human nature. In essence, the divine nature of Christ remains infinite and omnipresent even after the Incarnation.
  • How did John Calvin approach Christology?: John Calvin maintained that there was no human element in Christ's person that could be separated from the divine Person of the Word. He also stressed the importance of understanding Christ's 'Work' when attempting to comprehend his 'Person'.

The Council of Chalcedon in 451 established the doctrine of the hypostatic union, defining Christ as:

Answer: Having two natures, human and divine, united in one person without confusion or division.

The Council of Chalcedon defined the hypostatic union, stating Christ is one person in whom two natures (divine and human) are united without confusion or division.

Related Concepts:

  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • What was the central teaching of the Council of Chalcedon (451) concerning Christ's natures?: The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the dyophysite understanding of the hypostatic union, defining that Christ has two distinct and complete natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition became a reference point for many subsequent Christologies.

Which Christian tradition rejected the Chalcedonian definition and adheres to Miaphysitism?

Answer: Oriental Orthodox Churches

The Oriental Orthodox Churches rejected the Chalcedonian definition, adhering to Miaphysitism, which posits a single, unified nature of Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Christian traditions rejected the Chalcedonian definition of Christ's natures?: The Oriental Orthodox Churches rejected the Chalcedonian definition, adhering instead to Miaphysitism, which posits that the divine and human natures unite into a single, composite nature. This position was affirmed by the Second Council of Ephesus.
  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.

The 'extra calvinisticum' is a concept within Calvinist theology stating that:

Answer: Christ's divine nature is not limited by his human nature.

The 'extra calvinisticum' asserts that Christ's divine nature is not limited by his human nature, maintaining its infinite and omnipresent qualities.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'extra calvinisticum'?: The 'extra calvinisticum' is a concept within Calvinist theology that states that while Christ's divine nature is united with his human nature, the divine nature is not limited or contained by the human nature. In essence, the divine nature of Christ remains infinite and omnipresent even after the Incarnation.

How did the Council of Chalcedon's definition impact the unity of the early Church?

Answer: It led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches.

The Chalcedonian definition, while defining the hypostatic union for many, caused significant divisions, notably with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Council of Chalcedon's definition impact the unity of the early Church?: While the Chalcedonian definition clarified Christology for many, it led to significant schisms, particularly with the Oriental Orthodox Churches who rejected its formulation.
  • What was the central teaching of the Council of Chalcedon (451) concerning Christ's natures?: The Council of Chalcedon promulgated the dyophysite understanding of the hypostatic union, defining that Christ has two distinct and complete natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition became a reference point for many subsequent Christologies.
  • What key formulation regarding the union of Christ's natures was established at the Council of Chalcedon in 451?: The Council of Chalcedon in 451 issued the formulation of the hypostatic union, stating that Christ possesses two natures—one human and one divine—united in one person without confusion or division. This definition was affirmed by most major branches of Western and Eastern Orthodoxy.

Article 10 of the Belgic Confession aligns with Nicene orthodoxy concerning Christ's deity by emphasizing:

Answer: The eternal generation of the Son and his co-essential nature with the Father.

Article 10 of the Belgic Confession aligns with Nicene orthodoxy by emphasizing the eternal generation of the Son and his co-essential, co-eternal nature with the Father.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of Article 10 of the Belgic Confession regarding Christology?: Article 10 of the Belgic Confession aligns with Nicene orthodoxy concerning Christ's deity. It emphasizes the eternal generation of the Son and his co-essential and co-eternal nature with the Father, affirming his role as Creator.

Christological Models and Theologians

Functional Christology focuses on the fundamental nature or being of Jesus Christ.

Answer: False

Functional Christology examines Jesus Christ's works and actions, whereas ontological Christology focuses on his fundamental nature or being.

Related Concepts:

  • How are ontological, functional, and soteriological Christologies distinguished?: Ontological Christology analyzes the fundamental nature or being of Jesus Christ. Functional Christology examines his works and actions, while soteriological Christology focuses on his role and significance in salvation.
  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.
  • What are the central questions addressed by Christology regarding Jesus's nature?: Christology grapples with fundamental questions about Jesus's identity, such as whether he was solely human, solely divine, or both human and divine. It also explores the relationship between these two natures and their union within a single person.

Christology from above, or high Christology, begins by examining the human aspects of Jesus's life and ministry.

Answer: False

High Christology ('from above') emphasizes Jesus's divine attributes and pre-existence, interpreting his life through his divinity, while 'low Christology' ('from below') starts with his humanity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is meant by 'Christology from above' or 'high Christology'?: High Christology, also known as Christology from above, emphasizes Jesus's divine attributes, including his pre-existence as the Logos and his divine titles like 'Son of God'. This approach interprets his earthly works through the lens of his divinity.
  • What is the starting point for 'Christology from below' or 'low Christology'?: Low Christology, or Christology from below, begins by examining the human aspects of Jesus's life and ministry, such as his teachings and miracles. It then moves towards understanding his divinity and the mystery of the Incarnation.
  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.

The Alexandrian school of thought emphasized Christ as a distinct, unified human person separate from his divine relationship.

Answer: False

The Alexandrian school, influenced by the Gospel of John, emphasized Christ as the eternal Logos united with the Father prior to the Incarnation, not as a distinct human person.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Alexandrian and Antiochian schools of thought differ in their Christological approaches?: The Alexandrian school, influenced by the Gospel of John, viewed Jesus Christ as the eternal Logos who possessed unity with the Father prior to the Incarnation. In contrast, the Antiochian school emphasized Christ as a distinct, unified human person, separate from his divine relationship.
  • What does the 'Person of Christ' refer to in Christological discussions?: In Christological discussions, the 'Person of Christ' refers to the concept that Jesus Christ, possessing both divine and human natures, exists as a single, unified individual or hypostasis. Debates have centered on how these two natures coexist without confusion or division.

The 'threefold office' of Jesus Christ refers to his roles as prophet, priest, and king.

Answer: True

The 'threefold office' of Christ encompasses his roles as prophet, priest, and king, reflecting his messianic functions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'threefold office' of Jesus Christ?: The threefold office, developed by theologians like Eusebius and John Calvin, describes Jesus Christ fulfilling three functions: prophet, priest, and king. These roles are rooted in Old Testament concepts of anointing and are central to understanding his messianic identity.
  • What is the significance of the 'threefold office' of Christ in relation to the term 'Messiah'?: The threefold office (prophet, priest, king) is linked to the term 'Messiah' (anointed one) because, in the Old Testament, individuals were anointed for these roles. Jesus, as the Messiah, fulfills all three offices, with his kingship being the most frequently associated role, though his priestly function is detailed in the Book of Hebrews.

Thomas Aquinas's Christology emphasized the imperfection of Christ's human attributes.

Answer: False

Thomas Aquinas's Christology, particularly his 'Christology from above,' emphasized the perfection of Christ's human attributes and provided a systematic theological framework.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Thomas Aquinas contribute to Western medieval Christology?: Thomas Aquinas provided one of the first systematic Christologies that addressed existing theological issues. His 'Christology from above' also emphasized the perfection of Christ's human attributes, contributing significantly to scholastic Christology.
  • What is meant by 'popular Christology' versus 'scholastic Christology' in the medieval period?: 'Popular Christology' refers to the devotional expressions and piety, particularly among the Franciscans in the 12th and 13th centuries, that focused on a more personal and emotional image of Jesus. 'Scholastic Christology,' exemplified by Thomas Aquinas, involved systematic and philosophical approaches to defining Christ's nature and work.

Medieval piety saw a shift towards emphasizing Jesus as a distant, purely divine figure.

Answer: False

Medieval piety, especially influenced by Franciscan spirituality, shifted towards emphasizing Jesus as a relatable figure of love and comfort, rather than solely a distant divine entity.

Related Concepts:

  • What shift in the portrayal of Jesus occurred in the Middle Ages?: During the Middle Ages, particularly influenced by Franciscan piety, there was a shift towards a more 'popular Christology' that emphasized Jesus as a friend and a source of love and comfort, moving beyond the earlier 'Kyrios' (Lord) image.

Liberal Protestant theology in the 19th century generally reinforced the traditional emphasis on Jesus's divinity.

Answer: False

Liberal Protestant theology in the 19th century typically de-emphasized Jesus's divinity, focusing instead on his ethical teachings and historical significance.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Liberal Protestant theology in the 19th century approach Christology?: Liberal Protestant theology in the 19th century questioned traditional dogmatic foundations and employed critical-historical methods. It often de-emphasized Jesus's divinity, focusing instead on the ethical aspects of his teachings.

The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew emphasizes Jesus's divine presence, meaning 'God with us'.

Answer: True

The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel highlights Jesus's divine presence, signified by the name 'Emmanuel' meaning 'God with us'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Emmanuel Christology' in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel, highlighted by the name 'Emmanuel' meaning 'God with us', emphasizes Jesus's divine presence. Matthew builds on this theme throughout his Gospel, indicating Jesus's enduring presence with believers until the end of the age.
  • What is the 'Emmanuel Christology' found in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel centers on the name 'Emmanuel,' meaning 'God with us.' This theme underscores Jesus's divine presence and his ongoing relationship with believers throughout history, as seen in Matthew 1:23 and 28:20.

The 'threefold office' of Christ is linked to the term 'Messiah' because anointed individuals in the Old Testament held these roles.

Answer: True

The 'threefold office' (prophet, priest, king) is linked to the term 'Messiah' because these were roles fulfilled by individuals anointed in the Old Testament.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'threefold office' of Christ in relation to the term 'Messiah'?: The threefold office (prophet, priest, king) is linked to the term 'Messiah' (anointed one) because, in the Old Testament, individuals were anointed for these roles. Jesus, as the Messiah, fulfills all three offices, with his kingship being the most frequently associated role, though his priestly function is detailed in the Book of Hebrews.
  • What is the 'threefold office' of Jesus Christ?: The threefold office, developed by theologians like Eusebius and John Calvin, describes Jesus Christ fulfilling three functions: prophet, priest, and king. These roles are rooted in Old Testament concepts of anointing and are central to understanding his messianic identity.

Cosmic Christology, found in Paul's epistles, emphasizes Christ's role in reconciling the entire cosmos to God.

Answer: True

Cosmic Christology, particularly in Pauline epistles, emphasizes Christ's comprehensive role in the reconciliation of all creation to God.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'cosmic Christology' mentioned in relation to Paul's epistles?: Cosmic Christology, as seen in Pauline epistles like Colossians, emphasizes the role of Christ as the Son of God who affects the entire cosmos. It suggests that through Christ, all things are reconciled to God, and believers become 'new creations'.

Scholastic Christology, exemplified by Thomas Aquinas, focused on devotional piety and emotional images of Jesus.

Answer: False

Scholastic Christology, exemplified by Thomas Aquinas, was characterized by systematic and philosophical approaches, distinct from the devotional piety often associated with popular Christology.

Related Concepts:

  • What is meant by 'popular Christology' versus 'scholastic Christology' in the medieval period?: 'Popular Christology' refers to the devotional expressions and piety, particularly among the Franciscans in the 12th and 13th centuries, that focused on a more personal and emotional image of Jesus. 'Scholastic Christology,' exemplified by Thomas Aquinas, involved systematic and philosophical approaches to defining Christ's nature and work.
  • How did Thomas Aquinas contribute to Western medieval Christology?: Thomas Aquinas provided one of the first systematic Christologies that addressed existing theological issues. His 'Christology from above' also emphasized the perfection of Christ's human attributes, contributing significantly to scholastic Christology.

John Calvin believed Christ's divine nature was limited by his human person after the Incarnation.

Answer: False

John Calvin's theology, particularly concerning the 'extra calvinisticum,' maintained that Christ's divine nature was not limited by his human person after the Incarnation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did John Calvin approach Christology?: John Calvin maintained that there was no human element in Christ's person that could be separated from the divine Person of the Word. He also stressed the importance of understanding Christ's 'Work' when attempting to comprehend his 'Person'.
  • What is the 'extra calvinisticum'?: The 'extra calvinisticum' is a concept within Calvinist theology that states that while Christ's divine nature is united with his human nature, the divine nature is not limited or contained by the human nature. In essence, the divine nature of Christ remains infinite and omnipresent even after the Incarnation.

Karl Rahner believed modern Christology's primary task was to articulate Christ's divinity in ways understandable today.

Answer: True

Karl Rahner identified the primary task of modern Christology as articulating the belief that 'God became man' in Jesus Christ in a manner comprehensible to contemporary understanding.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Karl Rahner view the task of modern Christology?: Karl Rahner believed the primary task of modern Christology was to articulate the Christian belief that 'God became man and that God-made-man is the individual Jesus Christ' in a way that is understandable today, avoiding the confusions and mythologies of past debates.

Hans von Balthasar proposed that the union of Christ's natures occurred through 'absorption', where the divine nature assimilated the human.

Answer: False

Hans von Balthasar proposed 'assumption,' not 'absorption,' arguing the divine nature took on the human nature without assimilation or alteration.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Catholic concept of 'assumption' versus 'absorption' in relation to Christ's natures, as proposed by Hans von Balthasar?: Hans von Balthasar argued that the union of Christ's human and divine natures was achieved through 'assumption,' meaning the divine nature took on the human nature without being absorbed or altered by it. This maintained the distinctness and integrity of both natures.

The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel underscores Jesus's divine presence and his ongoing relationship with believers.

Answer: True

The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel emphasizes Jesus's divine presence ('God with us') and his enduring relationship with his followers.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Emmanuel Christology' in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel, highlighted by the name 'Emmanuel' meaning 'God with us', emphasizes Jesus's divine presence. Matthew builds on this theme throughout his Gospel, indicating Jesus's enduring presence with believers until the end of the age.
  • What is the 'Emmanuel Christology' found in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel centers on the name 'Emmanuel,' meaning 'God with us.' This theme underscores Jesus's divine presence and his ongoing relationship with believers throughout history, as seen in Matthew 1:23 and 28:20.

The Antiochian school of thought emphasized Christ's unity with the Father prior to the Incarnation.

Answer: False

The Antiochian school tended to emphasize Christ as a distinct human person, whereas the Alexandrian school focused on Christ's unity with the Father as the eternal Logos.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Alexandrian and Antiochian schools of thought differ in their Christological approaches?: The Alexandrian school, influenced by the Gospel of John, viewed Jesus Christ as the eternal Logos who possessed unity with the Father prior to the Incarnation. In contrast, the Antiochian school emphasized Christ as a distinct, unified human person, separate from his divine relationship.

Which type of Christology analyzes the fundamental nature or being of Jesus Christ?

Answer: Ontological Christology

Ontological Christology focuses on the fundamental nature or being of Jesus Christ, exploring his essential identity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.
  • How are ontological, functional, and soteriological Christologies distinguished?: Ontological Christology analyzes the fundamental nature or being of Jesus Christ. Functional Christology examines his works and actions, while soteriological Christology focuses on his role and significance in salvation.
  • What are the central questions addressed by Christology regarding Jesus's nature?: Christology grapples with fundamental questions about Jesus's identity, such as whether he was solely human, solely divine, or both human and divine. It also explores the relationship between these two natures and their union within a single person.

What is the starting point for 'Christology from below' (low Christology)?

Answer: The human aspects of Jesus's life and ministry.

'Christology from below' (low Christology) begins its inquiry with the human aspects of Jesus's life, ministry, and historical context.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the starting point for 'Christology from below' or 'low Christology'?: Low Christology, or Christology from below, begins by examining the human aspects of Jesus's life and ministry, such as his teachings and miracles. It then moves towards understanding his divinity and the mystery of the Incarnation.

How did the Alexandrian school of Christology primarily view Jesus Christ?

Answer: As the eternal Logos who possessed unity with the Father prior to the Incarnation.

The Alexandrian school emphasized Jesus Christ as the eternal Logos, highlighting his unity with the Father before the Incarnation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Alexandrian and Antiochian schools of thought differ in their Christological approaches?: The Alexandrian school, influenced by the Gospel of John, viewed Jesus Christ as the eternal Logos who possessed unity with the Father prior to the Incarnation. In contrast, the Antiochian school emphasized Christ as a distinct, unified human person, separate from his divine relationship.

What is the 'threefold office' of Jesus Christ?

Answer: Prophet, Priest, King

The 'threefold office' refers to Jesus Christ's fulfillment of the roles of prophet, priest, and king.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'threefold office' of Jesus Christ?: The threefold office, developed by theologians like Eusebius and John Calvin, describes Jesus Christ fulfilling three functions: prophet, priest, and king. These roles are rooted in Old Testament concepts of anointing and are central to understanding his messianic identity.
  • What is the significance of the 'threefold office' of Christ in relation to the term 'Messiah'?: The threefold office (prophet, priest, king) is linked to the term 'Messiah' (anointed one) because, in the Old Testament, individuals were anointed for these roles. Jesus, as the Messiah, fulfills all three offices, with his kingship being the most frequently associated role, though his priestly function is detailed in the Book of Hebrews.

Thomas Aquinas contributed to Western medieval Christology by:

Answer: Providing one of the first systematic Christologies addressing theological issues.

Thomas Aquinas made significant contributions to Western medieval Christology by developing one of the first systematic treatments of the subject, integrating philosophical reasoning with theological doctrine.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Thomas Aquinas contribute to Western medieval Christology?: Thomas Aquinas provided one of the first systematic Christologies that addressed existing theological issues. His 'Christology from above' also emphasized the perfection of Christ's human attributes, contributing significantly to scholastic Christology.

What shift in the portrayal of Jesus occurred in the Middle Ages, influenced by Franciscan piety?

Answer: Focus on Jesus as a friend and source of love and comfort.

Influenced by Franciscan piety, medieval portrayals of Jesus shifted towards emphasizing him as a relatable figure of love and comfort.

Related Concepts:

  • What shift in the portrayal of Jesus occurred in the Middle Ages?: During the Middle Ages, particularly influenced by Franciscan piety, there was a shift towards a more 'popular Christology' that emphasized Jesus as a friend and a source of love and comfort, moving beyond the earlier 'Kyrios' (Lord) image.
  • What is meant by 'popular Christology' versus 'scholastic Christology' in the medieval period?: 'Popular Christology' refers to the devotional expressions and piety, particularly among the Franciscans in the 12th and 13th centuries, that focused on a more personal and emotional image of Jesus. 'Scholastic Christology,' exemplified by Thomas Aquinas, involved systematic and philosophical approaches to defining Christ's nature and work.

Liberal Protestant theology in the 19th century typically approached Christology by:

Answer: De-emphasizing Jesus's divinity and focusing on his ethical teachings.

19th-century Liberal Protestant theology often approached Christology by focusing on Jesus's ethical teachings and historical impact, frequently de-emphasizing his divine attributes.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Liberal Protestant theology in the 19th century approach Christology?: Liberal Protestant theology in the 19th century questioned traditional dogmatic foundations and employed critical-historical methods. It often de-emphasized Jesus's divinity, focusing instead on the ethical aspects of his teachings.

What is the significance of the 'Emmanuel Christology' in the Gospel of Matthew?

Answer: It underscores Jesus's divine presence, meaning 'God with us'.

The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel highlights Jesus's divine presence ('God with us') and its implications for believers.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Emmanuel Christology' in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel, highlighted by the name 'Emmanuel' meaning 'God with us', emphasizes Jesus's divine presence. Matthew builds on this theme throughout his Gospel, indicating Jesus's enduring presence with believers until the end of the age.
  • What is the 'Emmanuel Christology' found in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel centers on the name 'Emmanuel,' meaning 'God with us.' This theme underscores Jesus's divine presence and his ongoing relationship with believers throughout history, as seen in Matthew 1:23 and 28:20.

What is the significance of the 'threefold office' of Christ in relation to the term 'Messiah'?

Answer: It reflects the Old Testament practice of anointing individuals for the roles of prophet, priest, and king.

The 'threefold office' is linked to 'Messiah' because, in the Old Testament, individuals were anointed for the roles of prophet, priest, and king, all of which Jesus fulfills.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'threefold office' of Christ in relation to the term 'Messiah'?: The threefold office (prophet, priest, king) is linked to the term 'Messiah' (anointed one) because, in the Old Testament, individuals were anointed for these roles. Jesus, as the Messiah, fulfills all three offices, with his kingship being the most frequently associated role, though his priestly function is detailed in the Book of Hebrews.
  • What is the 'threefold office' of Jesus Christ?: The threefold office, developed by theologians like Eusebius and John Calvin, describes Jesus Christ fulfilling three functions: prophet, priest, and king. These roles are rooted in Old Testament concepts of anointing and are central to understanding his messianic identity.

Cosmic Christology, as seen in Paul's epistles, emphasizes Christ's role in:

Answer: Reconciling the entire cosmos to God.

Cosmic Christology, particularly in Pauline epistles, emphasizes Christ's comprehensive role in the reconciliation of all creation to God.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'cosmic Christology' mentioned in relation to Paul's epistles?: Cosmic Christology, as seen in Pauline epistles like Colossians, emphasizes the role of Christ as the Son of God who affects the entire cosmos. It suggests that through Christ, all things are reconciled to God, and believers become 'new creations'.

What characterized 'scholastic Christology' in the medieval period?

Answer: Systematic and philosophical approaches to defining Christ's nature and work.

Scholastic Christology, exemplified by Thomas Aquinas, was characterized by systematic and philosophical approaches, distinct from the devotional piety often associated with popular Christology.

Related Concepts:

  • What is meant by 'popular Christology' versus 'scholastic Christology' in the medieval period?: 'Popular Christology' refers to the devotional expressions and piety, particularly among the Franciscans in the 12th and 13th centuries, that focused on a more personal and emotional image of Jesus. 'Scholastic Christology,' exemplified by Thomas Aquinas, involved systematic and philosophical approaches to defining Christ's nature and work.
  • How did Thomas Aquinas contribute to Western medieval Christology?: Thomas Aquinas provided one of the first systematic Christologies that addressed existing theological issues. His 'Christology from above' also emphasized the perfection of Christ's human attributes, contributing significantly to scholastic Christology.

How did John Calvin approach Christology?

Answer: He stressed the importance of understanding Christ's 'Work' when comprehending his 'Person'.

John Calvin emphasized the interconnectedness of Christ's 'Person' and 'Work,' arguing that understanding his salvific actions is crucial for comprehending his identity.

Related Concepts:

  • How did John Calvin approach Christology?: John Calvin maintained that there was no human element in Christ's person that could be separated from the divine Person of the Word. He also stressed the importance of understanding Christ's 'Work' when attempting to comprehend his 'Person'.

What did Karl Rahner identify as the primary task of modern Christology?

Answer: To articulate the belief that 'God became man and that God-made-man is the individual Jesus Christ' in a contemporary way.

Karl Rahner believed modern Christology's primary task was to express the core Christian belief of God becoming human in Jesus Christ in a way that resonates with contemporary understanding.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Karl Rahner view the task of modern Christology?: Karl Rahner believed the primary task of modern Christology was to articulate the Christian belief that 'God became man and that God-made-man is the individual Jesus Christ' in a way that is understandable today, avoiding the confusions and mythologies of past debates.

Hans von Balthasar's concept of 'assumption' versus 'absorption' in relation to Christ's natures means:

Answer: The divine nature took on the human nature without alteration.

Hans von Balthasar's concept of 'assumption' posits that the divine nature took on the human nature without altering or absorbing it, preserving the integrity of both.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Catholic concept of 'assumption' versus 'absorption' in relation to Christ's natures, as proposed by Hans von Balthasar?: Hans von Balthasar argued that the union of Christ's human and divine natures was achieved through 'assumption,' meaning the divine nature took on the human nature without being absorbed or altered by it. This maintained the distinctness and integrity of both natures.

The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel emphasizes:

Answer: Jesus's divine presence and ongoing relationship with believers.

Matthew's 'Emmanuel Christology' highlights Jesus's divine presence ('God with us') and his enduring relationship with his followers.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Emmanuel Christology' in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel, highlighted by the name 'Emmanuel' meaning 'God with us', emphasizes Jesus's divine presence. Matthew builds on this theme throughout his Gospel, indicating Jesus's enduring presence with believers until the end of the age.
  • What is the 'Emmanuel Christology' found in the Gospel of Matthew?: The 'Emmanuel Christology' in Matthew's Gospel centers on the name 'Emmanuel,' meaning 'God with us.' This theme underscores Jesus's divine presence and his ongoing relationship with believers throughout history, as seen in Matthew 1:23 and 28:20.

Atonement Theories

Atonement in Christian theology refers to humanity's reconciliation with God through Christ's sacrificial death.

Answer: True

Atonement signifies the reconciliation of humanity with God, primarily achieved through Christ's sacrificial death, which addresses sin and restores relationship.

Related Concepts:

  • How is atonement understood in Christian theology?: In Christian theology, atonement refers to the process by which humanity is reconciled to God through Christ's sacrificial suffering and death. It involves the forgiving of sins, enabling reconciliation between God and creation.

Gustaf Aulén's classification of atonement theories includes the 'classical paradigm', 'objective paradigm', and 'subjective paradigm'.

Answer: True

Gustaf Aulén categorized atonement theories into three main paradigms: classical (e.g., Christus Victor), objective (e.g., Satisfaction), and subjective (e.g., Moral Influence).

Related Concepts:

  • What are the main categories of atonement theories, according to Gustaf Aulén's classification?: Gustaf Aulén classified atonement theories into three main paradigms: the 'classical paradigm' (including Ransom theory and Christus Victor), the 'objective paradigm' (including Satisfaction theory and Penal Substitution), and the 'subjective paradigm' (including Moral Influence and Moral Example theories).

The Ransom theory of atonement suggests Christ's death satisfied God's honor and justice through his merit.

Answer: False

The Ransom theory posits Christ's death was a ransom paid to Satan or death to liberate humanity. Satisfaction theory, developed by Anselm, focuses on satisfying God's honor and justice.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Satisfaction theory of atonement'?: Developed by Anselm of Canterbury, the Satisfaction theory posits that Christ's crucifixion was a substitute for human sin, satisfying God's honor and justice through Christ's infinite merit.
  • What is the core idea of the Ransom theory of atonement?: The Ransom theory suggests that Christ's death was a ransom sacrifice, often considered paid to Satan or death itself, to free humanity from the bondage of sin. Aulén reinterpreted this as 'Christus Victor,' where Christ's death defeated the powers of evil.

Penal Substitution views sin as a violation of God's law incurring wrath, with Christ bearing the punishment.

Answer: True

Penal Substitution views sin as a legal transgression incurring divine wrath, with Christ vicariously bearing the punishment due to humanity.

Related Concepts:

  • What distinguishes 'Penal Substitution' from Anselm's 'Satisfaction theory'?: Penal Substitution, a development of the Satisfaction theory by the Reformers, views sin not just as an affront to God's honor but as a violation of God's law, incurring divine wrath. Christ's saving work is seen as his substitutionary bearing of this punishment in humanity's place.

The Moral Influence theory of atonement argues that Christ's death demonstrates God's love, inspiring a change of heart in sinners.

Answer: True

The Moral Influence theory posits that Christ's death serves as a powerful demonstration of God's love, inspiring repentance and moral transformation in believers.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Moral Influence theory of atonement'?: Propagated by Peter Abelard, the Moral Influence theory argues that Christ's death demonstrates God's love, which inspires a change of heart in sinners, leading them back to God. It focuses on the transformative impact of Christ's example.
  • What is the 'Moral Example theory' of atonement?: The Moral Example theory, associated with Faustus Socinus, proposes that Christ's death offers humanity a perfect example of self-sacrificial dedication to God, rejecting the idea of vicarious satisfaction. It emphasizes the ethical model provided by Christ's life and death.

The Moral Example theory proposes Christ's death offered humanity a vicarious satisfaction for sins.

Answer: False

The Moral Example theory emphasizes Christ's death as a perfect moral example, inspiring believers, rather than offering vicarious satisfaction for sins.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Moral Example theory' of atonement?: The Moral Example theory, associated with Faustus Socinus, proposes that Christ's death offers humanity a perfect example of self-sacrificial dedication to God, rejecting the idea of vicarious satisfaction. It emphasizes the ethical model provided by Christ's life and death.
  • What is the 'Moral Influence theory of atonement'?: Propagated by Peter Abelard, the Moral Influence theory argues that Christ's death demonstrates God's love, which inspires a change of heart in sinners, leading them back to God. It focuses on the transformative impact of Christ's example.
  • What are the main categories of atonement theories, according to Gustaf Aulén's classification?: Gustaf Aulén classified atonement theories into three main paradigms: the 'classical paradigm' (including Ransom theory and Christus Victor), the 'objective paradigm' (including Satisfaction theory and Penal Substitution), and the 'subjective paradigm' (including Moral Influence and Moral Example theories).

The Penal Substitution theory of atonement views Christ's death as a ransom paid to Satan.

Answer: False

The Penal Substitution theory views Christ's death as bearing divine wrath for sin, not as a ransom paid to Satan, which is characteristic of the Ransom theory.

Related Concepts:

  • What distinguishes 'Penal Substitution' from Anselm's 'Satisfaction theory'?: Penal Substitution, a development of the Satisfaction theory by the Reformers, views sin not just as an affront to God's honor but as a violation of God's law, incurring divine wrath. Christ's saving work is seen as his substitutionary bearing of this punishment in humanity's place.

The Moral Influence theory of atonement focuses on Christ's death as a demonstration of God's love that inspires change.

Answer: True

The Moral Influence theory emphasizes Christ's death as a demonstration of God's love, aiming to inspire moral change and repentance in humanity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Moral Influence theory of atonement'?: Propagated by Peter Abelard, the Moral Influence theory argues that Christ's death demonstrates God's love, which inspires a change of heart in sinners, leading them back to God. It focuses on the transformative impact of Christ's example.
  • What is the 'Moral Example theory' of atonement?: The Moral Example theory, associated with Faustus Socinus, proposes that Christ's death offers humanity a perfect example of self-sacrificial dedication to God, rejecting the idea of vicarious satisfaction. It emphasizes the ethical model provided by Christ's life and death.

The Satisfaction theory of atonement, developed by Anselm, posits Christ's crucifixion satisfied God's honor and justice.

Answer: True

Anselm's Satisfaction theory posits that Christ's death served as a vicarious satisfaction for humanity's sin, thereby honoring God's justice.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Satisfaction theory of atonement'?: Developed by Anselm of Canterbury, the Satisfaction theory posits that Christ's crucifixion was a substitute for human sin, satisfying God's honor and justice through Christ's infinite merit.
  • How is atonement understood in Christian theology?: In Christian theology, atonement refers to the process by which humanity is reconciled to God through Christ's sacrificial suffering and death. It involves the forgiving of sins, enabling reconciliation between God and creation.
  • What are the main categories of atonement theories, according to Gustaf Aulén's classification?: Gustaf Aulén classified atonement theories into three main paradigms: the 'classical paradigm' (including Ransom theory and Christus Victor), the 'objective paradigm' (including Satisfaction theory and Penal Substitution), and the 'subjective paradigm' (including Moral Influence and Moral Example theories).

In Christian theology, what does 'atonement' refer to?

Answer: The reconciliation of humanity to God through Christ's sacrificial death.

Atonement signifies the reconciliation of humanity with God, primarily achieved through Christ's sacrificial death, which addresses sin and restores relationship.

Related Concepts:

  • How is atonement understood in Christian theology?: In Christian theology, atonement refers to the process by which humanity is reconciled to God through Christ's sacrificial suffering and death. It involves the forgiving of sins, enabling reconciliation between God and creation.

Which of the following is NOT one of Gustaf Aulén's main categories of atonement theories?

Answer: The Modern Paradigm

Gustaf Aulén categorized atonement theories into three main paradigms: classical (e.g., Christus Victor), objective (e.g., Satisfaction), and subjective (e.g., Moral Influence).

Related Concepts:

  • What are the main categories of atonement theories, according to Gustaf Aulén's classification?: Gustaf Aulén classified atonement theories into three main paradigms: the 'classical paradigm' (including Ransom theory and Christus Victor), the 'objective paradigm' (including Satisfaction theory and Penal Substitution), and the 'subjective paradigm' (including Moral Influence and Moral Example theories).
  • What is the core idea of the Ransom theory of atonement?: The Ransom theory suggests that Christ's death was a ransom sacrifice, often considered paid to Satan or death itself, to free humanity from the bondage of sin. Aulén reinterpreted this as 'Christus Victor,' where Christ's death defeated the powers of evil.
  • How is atonement understood in Christian theology?: In Christian theology, atonement refers to the process by which humanity is reconciled to God through Christ's sacrificial suffering and death. It involves the forgiving of sins, enabling reconciliation between God and creation.

What is the core idea of the Ransom theory of atonement?

Answer: Christ's death was a ransom paid to Satan or death to free humanity.

The Ransom theory posits that Christ's death functioned as a ransom, paid to Satan or death, to liberate humanity from bondage.

Related Concepts:

  • How is atonement understood in Christian theology?: In Christian theology, atonement refers to the process by which humanity is reconciled to God through Christ's sacrificial suffering and death. It involves the forgiving of sins, enabling reconciliation between God and creation.
  • What is the core idea of the Ransom theory of atonement?: The Ransom theory suggests that Christ's death was a ransom sacrifice, often considered paid to Satan or death itself, to free humanity from the bondage of sin. Aulén reinterpreted this as 'Christus Victor,' where Christ's death defeated the powers of evil.

Penal Substitution, a development of the Satisfaction theory, views Christ's saving work as:

Answer: His substitutionary bearing of divine wrath for humanity's sin.

Penal Substitution views Christ's work as his substitutionary bearing of divine wrath and punishment for human sin.

Related Concepts:

  • What distinguishes 'Penal Substitution' from Anselm's 'Satisfaction theory'?: Penal Substitution, a development of the Satisfaction theory by the Reformers, views sin not just as an affront to God's honor but as a violation of God's law, incurring divine wrath. Christ's saving work is seen as his substitutionary bearing of this punishment in humanity's place.
  • What is the 'Satisfaction theory of atonement'?: Developed by Anselm of Canterbury, the Satisfaction theory posits that Christ's crucifixion was a substitute for human sin, satisfying God's honor and justice through Christ's infinite merit.
  • What are the main categories of atonement theories, according to Gustaf Aulén's classification?: Gustaf Aulén classified atonement theories into three main paradigms: the 'classical paradigm' (including Ransom theory and Christus Victor), the 'objective paradigm' (including Satisfaction theory and Penal Substitution), and the 'subjective paradigm' (including Moral Influence and Moral Example theories).

The Moral Influence theory of atonement, associated with Peter Abelard, argues that Christ's death:

Answer: Demonstrates God's love, inspiring a change of heart in sinners.

The Moral Influence theory, associated with Abelard, argues that Christ's death demonstrates God's love, thereby inspiring a change of heart in sinners.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Moral Influence theory of atonement'?: Propagated by Peter Abelard, the Moral Influence theory argues that Christ's death demonstrates God's love, which inspires a change of heart in sinners, leading them back to God. It focuses on the transformative impact of Christ's example.

What is the 'Satisfaction theory of atonement'?

Answer: Christ's death was a substitute for human sin, satisfying God's honor and justice.

The Satisfaction theory, developed by Anselm, posits that Christ's death satisfied God's honor and justice by acting as a substitute for human sin.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Satisfaction theory of atonement'?: Developed by Anselm of Canterbury, the Satisfaction theory posits that Christ's crucifixion was a substitute for human sin, satisfying God's honor and justice through Christ's infinite merit.
  • How is atonement understood in Christian theology?: In Christian theology, atonement refers to the process by which humanity is reconciled to God through Christ's sacrificial suffering and death. It involves the forgiving of sins, enabling reconciliation between God and creation.

Intersections with Other Doctrines

Some Catholic theologians view Mariology as separate from and unimportant to Christology.

Answer: False

Some Catholic theologians consider Mariology integral to Christology, viewing Mary's role as essential for a complete understanding of Christ.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Catholic theological perspective on Mariology's relationship to Christology?: Some Catholic theologians, like Karl Rahner and Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, view Mariology as a crucial and integral component of Christology. They argue that understanding Mary's role is necessary for a complete understanding of Christ's person and work, serving as a 'touchstone' for Christological substance.

The Catholic theological perspective views Mariology as a component of Christology, essential for a complete understanding of Christ.

Answer: True

From a Catholic theological perspective, Mariology is often considered an essential component of Christology, crucial for a comprehensive understanding of Christ's person and work.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Catholic theological perspective on Mariology's relationship to Christology?: Some Catholic theologians, like Karl Rahner and Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, view Mariology as a crucial and integral component of Christology. They argue that understanding Mary's role is necessary for a complete understanding of Christ's person and work, serving as a 'touchstone' for Christological substance.
  • What is the primary focus of Christology within Christian theology?: Christology is a branch of Christian theology dedicated to the study of Jesus Christ. It primarily concerns itself with understanding the nature, person, and work of Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and his role in salvation.

According to some Catholic theologians, Mariology is considered:

Answer: A crucial and integral component of Christology.

From a Catholic theological perspective, Mariology is often considered an essential component of Christology, crucial for a comprehensive understanding of Christ's person and work.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Catholic theological perspective on Mariology's relationship to Christology?: Some Catholic theologians, like Karl Rahner and Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, view Mariology as a crucial and integral component of Christology. They argue that understanding Mary's role is necessary for a complete understanding of Christ's person and work, serving as a 'touchstone' for Christological substance.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy