Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


Close Air Support: History, Doctrine, and Evolution

At a Glance

Title: Close Air Support: History, Doctrine, and Evolution

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Close Air Support Fundamentals and Definitions: 6 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Early Development: World War I: 11 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Interwar Period and German WWII Doctrine: 14 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Allied WWII CAS Evolution: 21 flashcards, 23 questions
  • Post-WWII: Korea and Vietnam: 15 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Modern CAS: Technology and Tactics: 9 flashcards, 9 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 76
  • True/False Questions: 39
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 39
  • Total Questions: 78

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Close Air Support: History, Doctrine, and Evolution

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Close air support" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Close Air Support: History, Doctrine, and Evolution

Study Guide: Close Air Support: History, Doctrine, and Evolution

Close Air Support Fundamentals and Definitions

Close Air Support (CAS) is defined by aerial warfare actions against hostile targets in close proximity to friendly forces, requiring detailed integration of each air mission with ground force movements.

Answer: True

The definition of Close Air Support (CAS) emphasizes aerial actions against hostile targets in close proximity to friendly forces, necessitating detailed integration of air missions with ground force movements.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary definition of Close Air Support (CAS)?: Close Air Support (CAS) is defined as aerial warfare actions, typically air-to-ground operations like strafes or airstrikes, conducted by military aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces. This type of fire support requires detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of all involved forces.
  • Which specialists are typically responsible for coordinating Close Air Support with ground forces?: Close Air Support requires excellent coordination with ground forces, which is typically handled by specialists such as artillery observers, joint terminal attack controllers (JTACs), and forward air controllers (FACs). For example, U.S. Air Force joint terminal attack controllers are often seen watching A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft provide CAS during live fire exercises.
  • What is the determining factor for an action to be classified as Close Air Support?: The determining factor for an action to be classified as Close Air Support is the requirement for detailed integration of the air mission with the fire and movement of all friendly forces involved, due to the close proximity of hostile targets to those forces.

Battlefield air interdiction requires the same detailed integration with friendly troop movements as Close Air Support.

Answer: False

Battlefield air interdiction, while affecting friendly units, does not demand the same level of detailed integration with friendly troop movements as Close Air Support, which is a key distinguishing factor.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Close Air Support relate to battlefield air interdiction?: Close Air Support is a closely related subset of air interdiction. Specifically, battlefield air interdiction refers to interdiction against enemy units that have near-term effects on friendly units but does not require the same detailed integration with friendly troop movements as CAS does.
  • What is the primary definition of Close Air Support (CAS)?: Close Air Support (CAS) is defined as aerial warfare actions, typically air-to-ground operations like strafes or airstrikes, conducted by military aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces. This type of fire support requires detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of all involved forces.

Specialists like joint terminal attack controllers (JTACs) are crucial for coordinating Close Air Support with ground forces.

Answer: True

Specialists such as joint terminal attack controllers (JTACs) and forward air controllers (FACs) are essential for ensuring effective coordination between air and ground forces in Close Air Support missions.

Related Concepts:

  • Which specialists are typically responsible for coordinating Close Air Support with ground forces?: Close Air Support requires excellent coordination with ground forces, which is typically handled by specialists such as artillery observers, joint terminal attack controllers (JTACs), and forward air controllers (FACs). For example, U.S. Air Force joint terminal attack controllers are often seen watching A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft provide CAS during live fire exercises.

What is the determining factor for an action to be classified as Close Air Support?

Answer: The requirement for detailed integration of the air mission with the fire and movement of all friendly forces involved.

The defining characteristic of Close Air Support is the imperative for detailed integration of the air mission with the fire and movement of all friendly forces, due to the close proximity of hostile targets.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the determining factor for an action to be classified as Close Air Support?: The determining factor for an action to be classified as Close Air Support is the requirement for detailed integration of the air mission with the fire and movement of all friendly forces involved, due to the close proximity of hostile targets to those forces.
  • What is the primary definition of Close Air Support (CAS)?: Close Air Support (CAS) is defined as aerial warfare actions, typically air-to-ground operations like strafes or airstrikes, conducted by military aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces. This type of fire support requires detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of all involved forces.
  • What types of aerial warfare actions are typically involved in Close Air Support?: Close Air Support primarily involves air-to-ground actions such as strafes, which are attacks with machine guns or cannons, and airstrikes, which involve dropping bombs or firing missiles. These actions are performed by military aircraft to support ground troops.

Which of the following weapons are NOT mentioned as being used in Close Air Support missions?

Answer: Submarine-launched torpedoes

Close Air Support missions utilize a range of air-to-ground weapons such as bombs, missiles, rockets, and autocannons. Submarine-launched torpedoes are naval weapons unrelated to aerial support.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of weapons can be used in Close Air Support missions?: Close Air Support missions can be conducted using a variety of weapons, including aerial bombs, glide bombs, missiles, rockets, autocannons, machine guns, and even directed-energy weapons such as lasers.

Which of the following is NOT a type of aerial warfare action typically involved in Close Air Support?

Answer: Long-range strategic bombing of enemy infrastructure.

Close Air Support involves direct air-to-ground actions against targets in close proximity to friendly forces. Long-range strategic bombing of enemy infrastructure is a distinct mission, classified as strategic bombing or air interdiction, not CAS.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of aerial warfare actions are typically involved in Close Air Support?: Close Air Support primarily involves air-to-ground actions such as strafes, which are attacks with machine guns or cannons, and airstrikes, which involve dropping bombs or firing missiles. These actions are performed by military aircraft to support ground troops.
  • What is the primary definition of Close Air Support (CAS)?: Close Air Support (CAS) is defined as aerial warfare actions, typically air-to-ground operations like strafes or airstrikes, conducted by military aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces. This type of fire support requires detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of all involved forces.
  • What types of weapons can be used in Close Air Support missions?: Close Air Support missions can be conducted using a variety of weapons, including aerial bombs, glide bombs, missiles, rockets, autocannons, machine guns, and even directed-energy weapons such as lasers.

Early Development: World War I

The first significant military use of aircraft in close air support of ground forces occurred during World War II.

Answer: False

Significant military use of aircraft for close air support dates back to World War I, which marked the initial integration of air power into ground combat operations.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the use of aircraft for close air support first become significant?: The use of aircraft in close air support of ground forces dates back to World War I, which was the first conflict to make significant military use of aerial forces. This marked the beginning of integrating air power directly into ground combat operations.
  • What role did air support play in the 1917 Battle of Cambrai?: Air support was first integrated into a battle plan on a large scale at the 1917 Battle of Cambrai, where a significant number of tanks were deployed. Despite high pilot casualties due to effective enemy anti-aircraft tactics, air support was later judged to have been of critical importance in areas where infantry forces were pinned down.
  • When did the Soviet Red Air Force begin to recognize the importance of ground-support aircraft?: The Soviet Union's Red Air Force quickly recognized the value of ground-support aircraft, with Soviet aircraft already tasked with disrupting enemy ground operations as early as the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol in 1939.

World War I CAS aircraft had a powerful psychological impact despite their limited destructive power.

Answer: True

Despite the limited destructive capability of early World War I aircraft, their presence and attacks had a significant psychological impact on both hostile and friendly ground troops.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the initial impact of World War I aircraft in CAS, despite their limited destructive power?: Despite the relatively limited direct effect of rifle caliber machine guns and light bombs from World War I aircraft compared to later eras, CAS aircraft were still able to achieve a powerful psychological impact. They served as a visible and personal enemy to hostile troops, while simultaneously providing friendly forces with visible proof of support from their superiors.
  • How did the Battle of the Somme contribute to the development of CAS tactics?: At the Battle of the Somme, 18 British armed reconnaissance planes improvised an assault by strafing enemy trenches after surveillance operations. The success of this unplanned attack spurred innovation in CAS tactics on both sides of the conflict.

Early CAS coordination during World War I was simplified by advanced air-to-ground radio communication.

Answer: False

Early CAS coordination during World War I was hindered, not simplified, by the primitive nature of air-to-ground radio communication, making effective coordination difficult.

Related Concepts:

  • What challenges did early CAS coordination face during World War I?: Early CAS coordination during World War I faced significant challenges due to the primitive nature of air-to-ground radio communication, making it relatively difficult to plan and execute coordinated attacks between aerial and ground units effectively.
  • When did the use of aircraft for close air support first become significant?: The use of aircraft in close air support of ground forces dates back to World War I, which was the first conflict to make significant military use of aerial forces. This marked the beginning of integrating air power directly into ground combat operations.

A dedicated air support doctrine and specialized fighter aircraft for ground attack were first introduced in 1916 during WWI.

Answer: True

While sporadic air attacks occurred from 1914, a dedicated air support doctrine and specialized ground attack fighters were indeed introduced in 1916 during World War I.

Related Concepts:

  • When was a dedicated air support doctrine first elaborated and specialized fighters put into service during WWI?: While aviators engaged in sporadic attacks on ground forces from the commencement of hostilities in 1914, it was not until 1916 that an air support doctrine was elaborated and dedicated fighter aircraft for the job were put into service, recognizing the demoralizing effect air attacks had on troops in trenches.
  • When did the use of aircraft for close air support first become significant?: The use of aircraft in close air support of ground forces dates back to World War I, which was the first conflict to make significant military use of aerial forces. This marked the beginning of integrating air power directly into ground combat operations.
  • What role did air support play in the 1917 Battle of Cambrai?: Air support was first integrated into a battle plan on a large scale at the 1917 Battle of Cambrai, where a significant number of tanks were deployed. Despite high pilot casualties due to effective enemy anti-aircraft tactics, air support was later judged to have been of critical importance in areas where infantry forces were pinned down.

The Battle of the Somme saw the first large-scale integration of air support into a battle plan.

Answer: False

While the Battle of the Somme featured improvised air assaults, the first large-scale integration of air support into a battle plan occurred at the 1917 Battle of Cambrai.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Battle of the Somme contribute to the development of CAS tactics?: At the Battle of the Somme, 18 British armed reconnaissance planes improvised an assault by strafing enemy trenches after surveillance operations. The success of this unplanned attack spurred innovation in CAS tactics on both sides of the conflict.
  • What role did air support play in the 1917 Battle of Cambrai?: Air support was first integrated into a battle plan on a large scale at the 1917 Battle of Cambrai, where a significant number of tanks were deployed. Despite high pilot casualties due to effective enemy anti-aircraft tactics, air support was later judged to have been of critical importance in areas where infantry forces were pinned down.

The Germans developed the first purpose-built ground attack aircraft, the Junkers J.I, during World War I.

Answer: True

The Germans were pioneers in ground attack warfare during World War I, developing the Junkers J.I as the first purpose-built ground attack aircraft.

Related Concepts:

  • What innovations did the Germans introduce in CAS aircraft during World War I?: The Germans quickly adopted ground attack warfare, preferring heavier two-seater planes like the Hannover CL.II with an additional machine gunner. They also built the first purpose-built ground attack aircraft, the Junkers J.I, which is depicted in the source material as a First World War German ground-attack aircraft.

CAS aircraft were a crucial factor in the British victory during the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of 1918.

Answer: True

In the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of 1918, Close Air Support aircraft played a crucial role in the British victory by conducting wide-ranging attacks after achieving air superiority.

Related Concepts:

  • How did CAS aircraft contribute to the British victory in the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of 1918?: In the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of 1918, CAS aircraft were a crucial factor in the ultimate British victory. After achieving air superiority, squadrons of S.E 5a's and D.H. 4s conducted wide-ranging attacks against German and Turkish positions, which, combined with a ground assault, led to the collapse and rout of three Turkish armies.

What innovation in CAS tactics was spurred by an improvised assault by British armed reconnaissance planes at the Battle of the Somme?

Answer: Strafing enemy trenches after surveillance operations.

The improvised strafing of enemy trenches by British reconnaissance planes at the Battle of the Somme demonstrated the potential of such tactics, leading to further innovation in Close Air Support.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Battle of the Somme contribute to the development of CAS tactics?: At the Battle of the Somme, 18 British armed reconnaissance planes improvised an assault by strafing enemy trenches after surveillance operations. The success of this unplanned attack spurred innovation in CAS tactics on both sides of the conflict.
  • How did British doctrine differentiate between types of air support during WWI?: At this time, British doctrine came to recognize two forms of air support: trench strafing, which is the modern-day doctrine of CAS, and ground strafing, which is the modern-day doctrine of air interdiction, involving attacks on tactical ground targets away from the immediate land battle.

Which battle saw air support first integrated into a battle plan on a large scale, despite high pilot casualties?

Answer: The 1917 Battle of Cambrai

The 1917 Battle of Cambrai marked the first large-scale integration of air support into a comprehensive battle plan, despite the significant pilot casualties incurred.

Related Concepts:

  • What role did air support play in the 1917 Battle of Cambrai?: Air support was first integrated into a battle plan on a large scale at the 1917 Battle of Cambrai, where a significant number of tanks were deployed. Despite high pilot casualties due to effective enemy anti-aircraft tactics, air support was later judged to have been of critical importance in areas where infantry forces were pinned down.

What was a significant challenge for early CAS coordination during World War I?

Answer: Primitive air-to-ground radio communication.

A significant challenge for early Close Air Support coordination during World War I was the primitive state of air-to-ground radio communication, which severely hampered effective real-time interaction between air and ground units.

Related Concepts:

  • What challenges did early CAS coordination face during World War I?: Early CAS coordination during World War I faced significant challenges due to the primitive nature of air-to-ground radio communication, making it relatively difficult to plan and execute coordinated attacks between aerial and ground units effectively.

Which of the following was NOT one of the first ground-attack aircraft debuted by the British in 1917?

Answer: Junkers J.I

While the British debuted modified F.E 2b fighters, Airco DH.5s, and Sopwith Camels as early ground-attack aircraft in 1917, the Junkers J.I was a purpose-built German ground-attack aircraft.

Related Concepts:

  • What were some of the first ground-attack aircraft debuted by the British in 1917?: In 1917, following the Second Battle of the Aisne, the British debuted the first ground-attack aircraft, which included a modified F.E 2b fighter carrying 20 lb bombs and mounted machine guns. Other modified planes used in this role were the Airco DH.5 and the Sopwith Camel, with the latter proving particularly successful.

How did British doctrine differentiate between types of air support during WWI?

Answer: Between trench strafing (modern CAS) and ground strafing (modern air interdiction).

British doctrine during World War I distinguished between trench strafing, which aligns with modern Close Air Support, and ground strafing, which corresponds to modern air interdiction, targeting tactical ground objectives away from the immediate battle.

Related Concepts:

  • How did British doctrine differentiate between types of air support during WWI?: At this time, British doctrine came to recognize two forms of air support: trench strafing, which is the modern-day doctrine of CAS, and ground strafing, which is the modern-day doctrine of air interdiction, involving attacks on tactical ground targets away from the immediate land battle.

Interwar Period and German WWII Doctrine

During the interwar period, aviators generally advocated for CAS, while ground officers preferred strategic bombing.

Answer: False

During the interwar period, aviators generally prioritized interdiction and strategic bombing, viewing CAS as inefficient, while ground officers often advocated for the flexibility and psychological impact of air support.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the differing views on CAS between aviators and ground officers during the interwar period?: During the interwar period, aviators generally sought independence from ground commanders and emphasized interdiction and strategic bombing, viewing CAS as difficult and inefficient. In contrast, ground officers argued that artillery was often insufficient and that aircraft offered flexibility for massing firepower and producing a greater psychological effect, without rendering ground untrafficable like massive artillery strikes.
  • What arguments did military theorists like J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart make for CAS?: Military theorists such as J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart expounded upon the importance of CAS during the interwar period, despite prevailing indifference. Hart, an advocate of Blitzkrieg tactics, argued that low-flying aircraft could serve as 'more mobile artillery' to support the rapid advance of armored tanks, which conventional artillery might not be able to keep up with.

The British Royal Air Force extensively used air power for policing colonial hotspots in the Middle East and North Africa during the interwar period.

Answer: True

The British Royal Air Force effectively utilized air power for policing and suppressing revolts in its colonial territories in the Middle East and North Africa throughout the interwar period.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the British Royal Air Force utilize air power in colonial hotspots during the interwar period?: The British Royal Air Force extensively used air power in colonial hotspots in the Middle East and North Africa during the interwar period. This included contributing to the defeat of the Afghan military, supporting ground operations in the Somaliland campaign with Z Force, and establishing RAF Iraq Command for cost-effective control of large areas, effectively suppressing the Great Iraqi Revolution of 1920 and other tribal revolts. The source material includes an image illustrating this extensive use of British air power for policing various regions in the Middle East during this period.

The German Condor Legion's CAS tactics during the Spanish Civil War had little influence on subsequent Luftwaffe doctrine.

Answer: False

The Close Air Support tactics developed by the German Condor Legion during the Spanish Civil War were highly influential and significantly shaped subsequent Luftwaffe doctrine.

Related Concepts:

  • What impact did the German Condor Legion have on Luftwaffe CAS doctrine during the Spanish Civil War?: During the Spanish Civil War, German volunteer aviators of the Condor Legion, fighting on the Nationalist side, developed close air support tactics that proved highly influential for the subsequent Luftwaffe doctrine, despite receiving little official support from their government.

Germany's unique recognition of the need for aerial support of ground operations was partly due to being forbidden from developing powerful strategic bombing capabilities by the Treaty of Versailles.

Answer: True

Germany's focus on aerial support for ground operations was partly influenced by the Treaty of Versailles, which restricted its development of strategic bombing capabilities, leading to a unique emphasis on CAS.

Related Concepts:

  • What was unique about the Luftwaffe's approach to CAS compared to its counterparts?: As a continental power focused on offensive operations, Germany uniquely recognized the need for aerial support of ground operations. While the Luftwaffe, like other air forces, focused on strategic bombing, it was distinct in its willingness to commit forces to Close Air Support, partly due to being forbidden from developing powerful strategic bombing capabilities by the Treaty of Versailles.

The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka was developed by Germany for close support after their experience with dive-bombing.

Answer: True

The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka dive bomber was a direct result of Germany's recognition of the accuracy and effectiveness of dive-bombing for close air support.

Related Concepts:

  • Which famous dive bomber was developed by Germany for close support?: The famous Junkers Ju 87 Stuka was developed by Germany for close support, following their experience with dive-bombing. The source material shows an image of a flight of Ju 87 D-5s over the Eastern Front during the winter of 1943–44.
  • How did Germany's exposure to dive-bombing influence its CAS aircraft development?: Germany's exposure to dive-bombing during joint exercises with Sweden in 1934 demonstrated its greater accuracy and difficulty for anti-aircraft gunners to track. This led Ernst Udet, chief of Luftwaffe development, to procure close support dive bombers, resulting in aircraft like the Henschel Hs 123 and the famous Junkers Ju 87 Stuka.
  • Which German dive bomber was known for its psychological effect and anti-tank capabilities?: The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka was a well-known German dive bomber successfully used for CAS. It was fitted with wind-blown sirens on its landing gear to enhance its psychological effect, and some variants were equipped with 37 mm *Bordkanone* BK 3,7 cannons in under-wing gun pods, loaded with armor-piercing ammunition for anti-tank operations.

German CAS declined after 1943 primarily due to a shift in Luftwaffe doctrine towards strategic bombing.

Answer: False

The decline of German CAS after 1943 was primarily due to the growing strength of the Red Air Force, redeployment of Luftwaffe assets for strategic defense, and dwindling resources, not a doctrinal shift towards strategic bombing.

Related Concepts:

  • What factors led to the decline of German CAS after 1943?: The decline of German CAS after 1943 was caused by the growing strength of the Red Air Force, the redeployment of Luftwaffe assets to defend against American and British strategic bombardment, and a dwindling supply of aircraft and fuel, which collectively crippled their ability to provide effective CAS on the western front.

During the interwar period, which military theorists expounded upon the importance of CAS despite prevailing indifference?

Answer: J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart

Military theorists such as J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart were notable proponents of Close Air Support during the interwar period, advocating for its role despite a general lack of interest among many aviators.

Related Concepts:

  • What arguments did military theorists like J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart make for CAS?: Military theorists such as J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart expounded upon the importance of CAS during the interwar period, despite prevailing indifference. Hart, an advocate of Blitzkrieg tactics, argued that low-flying aircraft could serve as 'more mobile artillery' to support the rapid advance of armored tanks, which conventional artillery might not be able to keep up with.
  • What were the differing views on CAS between aviators and ground officers during the interwar period?: During the interwar period, aviators generally sought independence from ground commanders and emphasized interdiction and strategic bombing, viewing CAS as difficult and inefficient. In contrast, ground officers argued that artillery was often insufficient and that aircraft offered flexibility for massing firepower and producing a greater psychological effect, without rendering ground untrafficable like massive artillery strikes.
  • Which conflicts during the interwar period saw notable use of CAS?: The interwar period saw the use of CAS in a number of conflicts, including the Polish–Soviet War, the Spanish Civil War, the Iraqi revolt of 1920, and the Gran Chaco War.

What was a key reason for Germany's unique willingness to commit forces to Close Air Support compared to other air forces before WWII?

Answer: They were forbidden from developing powerful strategic bombing capabilities by the Treaty of Versailles.

Germany's unique emphasis on Close Air Support before World War II was partly a consequence of the Treaty of Versailles, which restricted its development of powerful strategic bombing capabilities, leading to a focus on ground support.

Related Concepts:

  • What was unique about the Luftwaffe's approach to CAS compared to its counterparts?: As a continental power focused on offensive operations, Germany uniquely recognized the need for aerial support of ground operations. While the Luftwaffe, like other air forces, focused on strategic bombing, it was distinct in its willingness to commit forces to Close Air Support, partly due to being forbidden from developing powerful strategic bombing capabilities by the Treaty of Versailles.

What psychological impact did Stuka attacks, aided by sirens, have on French defenders during the 1940 Meuse River crossing?

Answer: They had a disproportionately powerful psychological impact, preventing defenders from manning positions.

During the 1940 Meuse River crossing, Stuka attacks, amplified by their sirens, exerted a significant psychological effect on French defenders, disrupting their ability to man positions despite limited direct physical damage.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the psychological impact of Stuka attacks during the Meuse River crossing in 1940?: During the Meuse River crossing in the 1940 Invasion of France, Stuka attacks, aided by sirens attached to the aircraft, had a disproportionately powerful psychological impact on French defenders. Although few guns were directly hit, the attacks kept the French under cover and prevented them from manning their positions, contributing significantly to the German advance.

Which German dive bomber was known for its psychological effect and anti-tank capabilities, including sirens and 37 mm cannons?

Answer: Junkers Ju 87 Stuka

The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka was a notorious German dive bomber, recognized for its psychological impact, enhanced by sirens, and its anti-tank capabilities, particularly variants equipped with 37 mm cannons.

Related Concepts:

  • Which German dive bomber was known for its psychological effect and anti-tank capabilities?: The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka was a well-known German dive bomber successfully used for CAS. It was fitted with wind-blown sirens on its landing gear to enhance its psychological effect, and some variants were equipped with 37 mm *Bordkanone* BK 3,7 cannons in under-wing gun pods, loaded with armor-piercing ammunition for anti-tank operations.

Which conflicts during the interwar period saw notable use of CAS?

Answer: The Polish–Soviet War, Spanish Civil War, and Gran Chaco War.

The interwar period featured notable applications of Close Air Support in conflicts such as the Polish–Soviet War, the Spanish Civil War, and the Gran Chaco War, among others.

Related Concepts:

  • Which conflicts during the interwar period saw notable use of CAS?: The interwar period saw the use of CAS in a number of conflicts, including the Polish–Soviet War, the Spanish Civil War, the Iraqi revolt of 1920, and the Gran Chaco War.

What dive-bombing tactics did U.S. Marine Aviators experiment with during the Banana Wars?

Answer: Dive bombing.

During the Banana Wars, U.S. Marine Aviators experimented with and adopted dive-bombing techniques as part of their air-ground tactics to support ground forces.

Related Concepts:

  • What dive-bombing tactics did U.S. Marine Aviators experiment with during the Banana Wars?: U.S. Marine Corps Aviation, acting as an intervention force in support of ground forces during the Banana Wars in places like Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua, experimented with air-ground tactics and adopted the technique of dive bombing.

How did the Luftwaffe organize for air-ground coordination in WWII?

Answer: By organizing air liaison detachments attached to ground units of the main effort.

In World War II, the Luftwaffe organized for air-ground coordination by attaching limited air liaison detachments to ground units, facilitating communication and reconnaissance, though not direct aircraft guidance.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Luftwaffe organize for air-ground coordination in WWII?: General Wolfram von Richthofen organized a limited number of air liaison detachments that were attached to ground units of the main effort. These detachments were responsible for passing requests from the ground to the air and receiving reconnaissance reports, though they were not trained to guide aircraft onto targets.

Allied WWII CAS Evolution

The Royal Air Force was well-prepared for CAS during the Battle of France in 1940, with excellent communication between air and army headquarters.

Answer: False

The Royal Air Force was poorly prepared for Close Air Support during the Battle of France in 1940, suffering from unreliable communications and separate headquarters for air and army commands.

Related Concepts:

  • What challenges did the RAF face in providing CAS during the Battle of France in 1940?: During the Battle of France in 1940, the Royal Air Force was woefully unprepared to provide CAS. Its headquarters were located separately from Army headquarters in France, leading to unreliable communications, and after the RAF's withdrawal, Army officers had to make long-distance calls to London to arrange air support.
  • How did the USAAF and British forces improve CAS coordination during the Italian Campaign?: During the Italian Campaign, American and British forces improved CAS coordination by exchanging techniques and ideas. The AAF's XII Air Support Command and the Fifth U.S. Army shared headquarters, met nightly to plan strikes, and developed a network of liaisons and radios for communication.
  • How did RAF commanders in North Africa improvise CAS coordination techniques?: In October 1941, Sir Arthur Tedder and Arthur Coningham, senior RAF commanders in North Africa, improvised CAS coordination by creating joint RAF-Army Air Support Control staffs at each corps and armored division headquarters. They also established a Forward Air Support Link at each brigade to quickly forward air support requests, which, once trained tentacle teams arrived in 1942, cut response time to thirty minutes.

The 'cab rank' strategy developed by the British in North Africa ensured continuous air support by rotating aircraft through attack, transit, and rearming phases.

Answer: True

The British 'cab rank' strategy, developed in North Africa, was an innovative system designed to provide continuous Close Air Support by maintaining a rotation of aircraft in various stages of mission readiness.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the 'cab rank' strategy developed by the British in North Africa.: The 'cab rank' strategy, developed by the British in North Africa, involved a system of three aircraft. One aircraft would be actively attacking, another would be in flight to the battle area, and a third would be at its base being refueled and rearmed. Ground control would direct the aircraft by radio, ensuring continuous air support, and if an attack failed, the next aircraft in the 'cab rank' would continue the assault.

Forward air control (FAC) was first used by the USAAF during operations in Salerno.

Answer: False

Forward air control (FAC) was first implemented by the British Desert Air Force in North Africa, with the USAAF later adopting the technique during operations in Salerno.

Related Concepts:

  • Where was forward air control (FAC) first used to guide CAS aircraft?: The use of forward air control (FAC) to guide close air support aircraft, ensuring attacks hit intended targets and not friendly troops, was first implemented by the British Desert Air Force in North Africa. The USAAF later adopted this technique during operations in Salerno.

The principal mission of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) at the start of WWII was close air support.

Answer: False

At the outset of World War II, the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) primarily focused on strategic bombing, believing it could win the war without extensive ground troop involvement, rather than close air support.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the initial doctrinal priority of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) at the start of WWII?: At the start of World War II, the principal mission and doctrine of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) was strategic bombing, based on the belief that unescorted bombers could win the war without significant ground troop involvement.

To prevent friendly fire during the 1944 invasion of France, Allied aircraft were painted with black and white 'invasion stripes'.

Answer: True

The distinctive black and white 'invasion stripes' were applied to all Allied aircraft during the 1944 invasion of France as a critical measure to prevent friendly fire incidents.

Related Concepts:

  • What measure was taken to prevent friendly fire incidents during the planned invasion of France in 1944?: To prevent friendly fire incidents during the planned invasion of France in 1944, black and white 'invasion stripes' were painted on all Allied aircraft. This distinctive marking helped ground troops and other aircraft quickly identify friendly forces.

General Elwood Quesada introduced the use of modified antiaircraft radar to track and redirect friendly attack aircraft for CAS in 1944.

Answer: True

General Elwood Quesada implemented several innovations for Close Air Support in 1944, including the use of modified antiaircraft radar to track and redirect friendly attack aircraft.

Related Concepts:

  • What innovations did General Elwood Quesada introduce for CAS under IX Tactical Air Command in 1944?: In 1944, General Elwood Quesada, commander of IX Tactical Air Command, introduced several innovations for CAS. These included the 'armored column cover' to provide continuous fighter-bomber availability for tank advances, using modified antiaircraft radar to track and redirect friendly attack aircraft, assigning fighter pilots to tours as forward air controllers, and providing VHF aircraft radios to tank crews for direct communication with overhead fighter-bombers.

General Patton credited close air support from XIX Tactical Air Command as a key factor in his Third Army's swift success.

Answer: True

General Patton acknowledged the crucial role of close air support from XIX Tactical Air Command, particularly armed reconnaissance, in enabling the rapid advance and success of his Third Army.

Related Concepts:

  • How did XIX Tactical Air Command support General Patton's Third Army?: XIX Tactical Air Command, under General Otto P. Weyland, provided close air support to General Patton's Third Army through tactics like armed reconnaissance, which was crucial for guarding Patton's exposed southern flank during his rapid advance across France. Patton credited this close air support as a key factor in his army's swift success.

The American Navy and Marine Corps primarily used CAS in the Pacific theater as a substitute for strategic bombing.

Answer: False

In the Pacific theater, the American Navy and Marine Corps primarily utilized Close Air Support as a complement to or substitute for artillery and naval gunfire, not as a replacement for strategic bombing.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the American Navy and Marine Corps utilize CAS in the Pacific theater?: The American Navy and Marine Corps utilized CAS in the Pacific theater as a complement to or substitute for artillery and naval gunfire. Aircraft such as F6F Hellcats and F4U Corsairs used bombs, rockets, and napalm to dislodge or attack Japanese troops, particularly those entrenched in cave complexes during the latter part of World War II. The source material displays an image of a U.S. Navy aircraft conducting a strafing run against Japanese positions during the New Guinea campaign of the Pacific War in 1942.

The Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik was a purpose-built aircraft highly effective for the Soviet Union in blunting German Panzers during WWII.

Answer: True

The Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik was a highly effective, purpose-built ground attack aircraft that played a critical role for the Soviet Union in countering German armored forces during World War II.

Related Concepts:

  • Which purpose-built aircraft was highly effective for the Soviet Union in CAS during WWII?: The Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik, a purpose-built aircraft, proved highly effective for the Soviet Union in blunting the activity of German Panzers during World War II. It became the single most produced military aircraft in world history.
  • What famous quote by Joseph Stalin highlights the importance of the Ilyushin Il-2?: Joseph Stalin paid the Ilyushin Il-2 a great tribute, stating in a cable to a factory manager that 'They are as essential to the Red Army as air and bread,' emphasizing its critical importance to the Soviet war effort.
  • Which Allied power in WWII used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively?: Of the Allied powers in World War II, the Soviet Union used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively than the UK and US. Notable examples include the Ilyushin Il-2, the most produced military aircraft in history, and the Polikarpov Po-2 biplane.

Dive bombers offered greater accuracy and were harder for anti-aircraft gunners to track during WWII CAS missions.

Answer: True

Dive bombers proved advantageous in World War II Close Air Support due to their enhanced accuracy compared to level bombing and their rapid altitude changes, which made them more challenging targets for anti-aircraft defenses.

Related Concepts:

  • What advantages did dive bombers offer for CAS missions during WWII?: During World War II, dive bombers offered greater accuracy than level bombing runs for CAS missions. Additionally, their rapid altitude changes made them more difficult for anti-aircraft gunners to track, enhancing their survivability and effectiveness.

The North American A-36 Apache was a modification of the P-51 Mustang specifically developed for CAS, including dive brakes.

Answer: True

The North American A-36 Apache was indeed a P-51 Mustang variant specifically engineered for Close Air Support, featuring modifications such as dive brakes to optimize its ground attack capabilities.

Related Concepts:

  • What modifications were made to the P-51 Mustang for CAS, creating the A-36 Apache?: The North American A-36 Apache was a modification of the North American P-51 Mustang, specifically developed for CAS, which included the addition of dive brakes to enhance its ground attack capabilities.

Many WWII fighters were effective CAS platforms because they were optimized for low-level flying with external ordnance.

Answer: False

Many WWII fighters were not ideal CAS platforms because they were typically optimized for high-altitude operations without external ordnance, making low-level flying with bombs inefficient and quickly depleting fuel.

Related Concepts:

  • Why were many fighters not effective CAS platforms during WWII despite being pressed into service?: Many fighters were not effective CAS platforms during WWII because they were usually optimized for high-altitude operations without external ordnance, meaning low-level flying with bombs quickly expended fuel. Additionally, cannons had to be mounted differently for strafing, requiring a further and lower convergence point than for aerial combat, which was not standard for most fighters.

The Soviet Union used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively than the UK and US during WWII.

Answer: True

Among the Allied powers in World War II, the Soviet Union notably employed specifically designed ground attack aircraft, such as the Ilyushin Il-2, more extensively than the United Kingdom and the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Allied power in WWII used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively?: Of the Allied powers in World War II, the Soviet Union used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively than the UK and US. Notable examples include the Ilyushin Il-2, the most produced military aircraft in history, and the Polikarpov Po-2 biplane.
  • When did the Soviet Red Air Force begin to recognize the importance of ground-support aircraft?: The Soviet Union's Red Air Force quickly recognized the value of ground-support aircraft, with Soviet aircraft already tasked with disrupting enemy ground operations as early as the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol in 1939.

What report in August 1940 recommended the creation of distinct tactical air force liaison officers ('tentacles') for RAF CAS doctrine?

Answer: The Wann-Woodall Report

The Wann-Woodall Report, issued in August 1940, was instrumental in recommending the establishment of tactical air force liaison officers, or 'tentacles,' to improve RAF Close Air Support doctrine.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Wann-Woodall Report for RAF CAS doctrine?: The Wann-Woodall Report, issued in August 1940 by Group Captain A. H. Wann and Colonel J.D. Woodall, recommended the creation of distinct tactical air force liaison officers, colloquially known as 'tentacles,' to accompany Army divisions and brigades. This report spurred the RAF to establish an Army Cooperation Command and develop procedures for placing an Air Liaison Officer with each brigade.

What system, introduced by the British during the Italian Campaign, allowed air controllers and army liaison officers at the front to redirect incoming strike aircraft to more pressing targets?

Answer: The 'Rover' system

The British 'Rover' system, implemented during the Italian Campaign, significantly enhanced Close Air Support flexibility by enabling air controllers and army liaison officers to dynamically redirect strike aircraft to emerging targets.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Rover' system implemented by the British during the Italian Campaign?: The British 'Rover' system, introduced during the Italian Campaign, involved pairings of air controllers and army liaison officers at the front who could seamlessly switch communications between brigades. Incoming strike aircraft had pre-briefed targets but could be redirected by Rovers to more pressing targets, using artillery smoke shells, map grid coordinates, or terrain descriptions for guidance.
  • Where was forward air control (FAC) first used to guide CAS aircraft?: The use of forward air control (FAC) to guide close air support aircraft, ensuring attacks hit intended targets and not friendly troops, was first implemented by the British Desert Air Force in North Africa. The USAAF later adopted this technique during operations in Salerno.
  • How did the USAAF and British forces improve CAS coordination during the Italian Campaign?: During the Italian Campaign, American and British forces improved CAS coordination by exchanging techniques and ideas. The AAF's XII Air Support Command and the Fifth U.S. Army shared headquarters, met nightly to plan strikes, and developed a network of liaisons and radios for communication.

What was the primary mission and doctrine of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) at the start of World War II?

Answer: Strategic bombing.

At the commencement of World War II, the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) doctrine was predominantly focused on strategic bombing, with the belief that it could achieve victory independently.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the initial doctrinal priority of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) at the start of WWII?: At the start of World War II, the principal mission and doctrine of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) was strategic bombing, based on the belief that unescorted bombers could win the war without significant ground troop involvement.

What was one of the innovations General Elwood Quesada introduced for CAS under IX Tactical Air Command in 1944?

Answer: Assigning fighter pilots to tours as forward air controllers.

General Elwood Quesada's innovations for Close Air Support in 1944 included assigning fighter pilots to serve as forward air controllers, fostering a deeper understanding of ground operations among aircrews.

Related Concepts:

  • What innovations did General Elwood Quesada introduce for CAS under IX Tactical Air Command in 1944?: In 1944, General Elwood Quesada, commander of IX Tactical Air Command, introduced several innovations for CAS. These included the 'armored column cover' to provide continuous fighter-bomber availability for tank advances, using modified antiaircraft radar to track and redirect friendly attack aircraft, assigning fighter pilots to tours as forward air controllers, and providing VHF aircraft radios to tank crews for direct communication with overhead fighter-bombers.

How did the American Navy and Marine Corps utilize CAS in the Pacific theater during WWII?

Answer: As a complement to or substitute for artillery and naval gunfire.

In the Pacific theater of World War II, the American Navy and Marine Corps employed Close Air Support as a vital complement to or substitute for traditional artillery and naval gunfire, particularly against entrenched Japanese positions.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the American Navy and Marine Corps utilize CAS in the Pacific theater?: The American Navy and Marine Corps utilized CAS in the Pacific theater as a complement to or substitute for artillery and naval gunfire. Aircraft such as F6F Hellcats and F4U Corsairs used bombs, rockets, and napalm to dislodge or attack Japanese troops, particularly those entrenched in cave complexes during the latter part of World War II. The source material displays an image of a U.S. Navy aircraft conducting a strafing run against Japanese positions during the New Guinea campaign of the Pacific War in 1942.

What famous quote by Joseph Stalin highlights the importance of the Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik?

Answer: 'They are as essential to the Red Army as air and bread.'

Joseph Stalin's famous quote, 'They are as essential to the Red Army as air and bread,' underscored the critical importance of the Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik to the Soviet war effort in World War II.

Related Concepts:

  • What famous quote by Joseph Stalin highlights the importance of the Ilyushin Il-2?: Joseph Stalin paid the Ilyushin Il-2 a great tribute, stating in a cable to a factory manager that 'They are as essential to the Red Army as air and bread,' emphasizing its critical importance to the Soviet war effort.
  • Which purpose-built aircraft was highly effective for the Soviet Union in CAS during WWII?: The Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik, a purpose-built aircraft, proved highly effective for the Soviet Union in blunting the activity of German Panzers during World War II. It became the single most produced military aircraft in world history.

What system did Marine Captain Marian Cranford Dalby develop for radar-guided bomb release?

Answer: The AN/MPQ-14

Marine Captain Marian Cranford Dalby developed the AN/MPQ-14 system, which enabled radar-guided bomb release, significantly improving precision bombing capabilities in adverse conditions.

Related Concepts:

  • What radar-guided bomb release system was developed by Marine Captain Marian Cranford Dalby?: Marine Captain Marian Cranford Dalby developed the AN/MPQ-14, a system that enabled radar-guided bomb release at night or in poor weather, based on Navy experiments with the KGW-1 Loon (the Navy's designation for the German V-1 flying bomb).

What measure was taken by the USAAF in 1943 that hindered CAS efforts during the North African Campaign?

Answer: They changed radio frequencies to be incompatible with ground radios.

In 1943, the USAAF's decision to change its radio frequencies, rendering them incompatible with ground radios, significantly hampered Close Air Support efforts during the North African Campaign.

Related Concepts:

  • What issues plagued USAAF CAS efforts during the North African Campaign?: During the North African Campaign, USAAF CAS was poorly executed due to its doctrinal priorities focusing on strategic bombing, leading to few aerial assets being assigned to U.S. troops. The situation was further complicated in 1943 when the USAAF changed its radio frequencies to be incompatible with ground radios, hindering communication and coordination.

When did the Soviet Red Air Force begin to recognize the importance of ground-support aircraft?

Answer: As early as the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol in 1939.

The Soviet Red Air Force recognized the importance of ground-support aircraft early, with tasks involving disrupting enemy ground operations dating back to the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol in 1939.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the Soviet Red Air Force begin to recognize the importance of ground-support aircraft?: The Soviet Union's Red Air Force quickly recognized the value of ground-support aircraft, with Soviet aircraft already tasked with disrupting enemy ground operations as early as the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol in 1939.

Which Allied power in WWII used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively than the UK and US?

Answer: Soviet Union

The Soviet Union, among the Allied powers in World War II, made more extensive use of specifically designed ground attack aircraft, such as the Ilyushin Il-2, compared to the United Kingdom and the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Allied power in WWII used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively?: Of the Allied powers in World War II, the Soviet Union used specifically designed ground attack aircraft more extensively than the UK and US. Notable examples include the Ilyushin Il-2, the most produced military aircraft in history, and the Polikarpov Po-2 biplane.

Post-WWII: Korea and Vietnam

During the Korean War, the newly created United States Air Force (USAF) prioritized CAS, leading to excellent battlefield support.

Answer: False

During the Korean War, the USAF initially de-emphasized Close Air Support in favor of strategic bombing and jet interceptors, resulting in significant coordination issues and insufficient battlefield support.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the United States Air Force's initial stance on CAS during the Korean War?: During the Korean War, the newly created United States Air Force (USAF) initially moved away from CAS, prioritizing strategic bombers and jet interceptors, which led to insufficient battlefield support and coordination issues.
  • What improvements did the USAF make to its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War?: Despite a rocky start, the USAF worked to improve its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War. This included requiring pilots to serve 80 days as forward air controllers (FACs) to understand ground difficulties and providing airborne FACs in critical locations. The Army also learned to assist by suppressing anti-aircraft fire before air strikes.
  • What were the main flaws in CAS application revealed by the Korean War?: The Korean War revealed several flaws in CAS application: the USAF preferred interdiction over fire support while the Army prioritized support missions; the Army advocated decentralization for reactivity while the USAF favored centralization; there was a lack of joint training and culture; and jet fighters were too fast and strategic bombers too large for effective CAS.

General MacArthur excluded USAF aircraft from the Inchon Landing, relying instead on Marine Aircraft Group 33 for CAS.

Answer: True

General MacArthur's decision to exclude USAF aircraft from the Inchon Landing and rely on Marine Aircraft Group 33 for Close Air Support highlighted the USAF's initial challenges and lack of focus on ground support during the Korean War.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did General MacArthur exclude USAF aircraft from the Inchon Landing?: General MacArthur excluded USAF aircraft from the airspace over the Inchon Landing in September 1950, instead relying on Marine Aircraft Group 33 for CAS, likely due to the USAF's initial lack of focus and coordination issues with ground support during the Korean War.

The Howze Board recommended a helicopter-based CAS requirement in the late 1950s and early 1960s.

Answer: True

The Howze Board's landmark report in the late 1950s and early 1960s indeed recommended the establishment of a helicopter-based Close Air Support requirement for the U.S. Army.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Howze Board recommend regarding CAS in the late 1950s and early 1960s?: During the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Howze Board, which studied the US Army's dedicated CAS needs, published a landmark report describing the necessity for a helicopter-based CAS requirement.
  • How did the US Army eventually adopt helicopter-based CAS?: Although the Army did not initially follow the Howze Board's recommendation, it eventually adopted the use of helicopter gunships and attack helicopters in the CAS role, recognizing their value in direct support of ground units.

U.S. Marine Corps Aviation was well-prepared for CAS in Vietnam because it considered CAS its central mission.

Answer: True

U.S. Marine Corps Aviation was uniquely prepared for Close Air Support in Vietnam, as CAS was considered its primary mission, a doctrine reflected in its training manuals.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was U.S. Marine Corps Aviation well-prepared for CAS in Vietnam?: U.S. Marine Corps Aviation was much more prepared for the application of CAS in the Vietnam War because CAS was considered its central mission. In fact, Marine training manuals as late as 1998 claimed CAS as a Marine Corps innovation.
  • What debate occurred within the Marine Corps regarding CAS doctrine during the Vietnam War?: During the Vietnam War, a main debate within the Marine Corps concerned whether to adopt the helicopter gunship as part of CAS doctrine and what its integration would mean for fixed-wing CAS. This issue was eventually resolved as the helicopter gunship proved crucial in the combat environment.
  • What system proved crucial to improving Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War?: The adaptation of the Tactical Air Control System proved crucial to the improvement of Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War, enhancing communication equipment and procedures that had long been problematic.

Helicopters offered greater battlefield persistence in CAS roles compared to fixed-wing aircraft due to their higher speeds.

Answer: False

Helicopters offered greater battlefield persistence in Close Air Support due to their low speeds and ability to use terrain for cover, not higher speeds, which is a characteristic of fixed-wing aircraft.

Related Concepts:

  • What advantages did helicopters offer in the CAS role compared to fixed-wing aircraft?: While not as fast and more vulnerable to anti-aircraft weaponry, helicopters offered significant advantages in the CAS role due to their ability to use terrain for cover and, more importantly, their much greater battlefield persistence owing to their low speeds. This made them a natural complement to ground forces.

The Douglas AC-47 Spooky was the first cargo aircraft converted into a gunship for CAS during the Korean War.

Answer: False

The Douglas AC-47 Spooky was the first cargo aircraft converted into a gunship for Close Air Support, but this occurred during the Vietnam War, not the Korean War.

Related Concepts:

  • Which aircraft were converted into gunships for CAS and air interdiction during the Vietnam War?: In the Vietnam War, the United States converted several cargo aircraft into gunships for CAS and air interdiction roles. The first was the Douglas AC-47 Spooky, converted from the Douglas C-47 Skytrain/Douglas DC-3, followed by the Fairchild AC-119 and the Lockheed AC-130.

What critical assessment did Harold K. Johnson make regarding CAS effectiveness in the Korean War?

Answer: CAS was unreliable, often unable to find or hit targets, and caused little damage.

Harold K. Johnson's critical assessment of Close Air Support in the Korean War highlighted its unreliability, frequent inability to locate or strike targets effectively, and limited destructive impact.

Related Concepts:

  • What critical assessment did Harold K. Johnson make regarding CAS effectiveness in the Korean War?: Harold K. Johnson, then commander of the 8th Cavalry Regiment, made a critical assessment of CAS effectiveness in the Korean War, stating, 'If you want it, you can't get it. If you can get it, it can't find you. If it can find you, it can't identify the target. If it can identify the target, it can't hit it. But if it does hit the target, it doesn't do a great deal of damage anyway.'
  • What were the main flaws in CAS application revealed by the Korean War?: The Korean War revealed several flaws in CAS application: the USAF preferred interdiction over fire support while the Army prioritized support missions; the Army advocated decentralization for reactivity while the USAF favored centralization; there was a lack of joint training and culture; and jet fighters were too fast and strategic bombers too large for effective CAS.

What was a main flaw in CAS application revealed by the Korean War regarding joint training?

Answer: There was a lack of joint training and culture.

The Korean War exposed a significant flaw in Close Air Support application: a pervasive lack of joint training and a unified culture between air and ground forces, hindering effective coordination.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the main flaws in CAS application revealed by the Korean War?: The Korean War revealed several flaws in CAS application: the USAF preferred interdiction over fire support while the Army prioritized support missions; the Army advocated decentralization for reactivity while the USAF favored centralization; there was a lack of joint training and culture; and jet fighters were too fast and strategic bombers too large for effective CAS.
  • What was the United States Air Force's initial stance on CAS during the Korean War?: During the Korean War, the newly created United States Air Force (USAF) initially moved away from CAS, prioritizing strategic bombers and jet interceptors, which led to insufficient battlefield support and coordination issues.
  • What improvements did the USAF make to its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War?: Despite a rocky start, the USAF worked to improve its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War. This included requiring pilots to serve 80 days as forward air controllers (FACs) to understand ground difficulties and providing airborne FACs in critical locations. The Army also learned to assist by suppressing anti-aircraft fire before air strikes.

What system proved crucial to improving Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War?

Answer: The Tactical Air Control System

The adaptation of the Tactical Air Control System was pivotal in enhancing Air Force Close Air Support during the Vietnam War, addressing long-standing communication and procedural challenges.

Related Concepts:

  • What system proved crucial to improving Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War?: The adaptation of the Tactical Air Control System proved crucial to the improvement of Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War, enhancing communication equipment and procedures that had long been problematic.
  • What adaptations were made to Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War?: During the Vietnam War, Air Force CAS saw adaptations such as the successful replacement of propeller-driven aircraft with jets, the Air Force assuming responsibility for the air request net to improve communication, and the implementation of CAS control agencies at the corps level under Air Force control. Additionally, airborne Forward Air Controllers (FACs) were utilized, and B-52 bombers were even employed for CAS missions.

What debate occurred within the Marine Corps regarding CAS doctrine during the Vietnam War?

Answer: Whether to adopt the helicopter gunship as part of CAS doctrine and its integration with fixed-wing CAS.

A key doctrinal debate within the Marine Corps during the Vietnam War centered on the integration of helicopter gunships into Close Air Support operations and their relationship with existing fixed-wing CAS capabilities.

Related Concepts:

  • What debate occurred within the Marine Corps regarding CAS doctrine during the Vietnam War?: During the Vietnam War, a main debate within the Marine Corps concerned whether to adopt the helicopter gunship as part of CAS doctrine and what its integration would mean for fixed-wing CAS. This issue was eventually resolved as the helicopter gunship proved crucial in the combat environment.
  • Why was U.S. Marine Corps Aviation well-prepared for CAS in Vietnam?: U.S. Marine Corps Aviation was much more prepared for the application of CAS in the Vietnam War because CAS was considered its central mission. In fact, Marine training manuals as late as 1998 claimed CAS as a Marine Corps innovation.

Which of the following aircraft was NOT mentioned as being used for ground attack during the Korean War?

Answer: Lockheed AC-130

While Hawker Sea Fury fighters, Vought F4U Corsairs, and Douglas A-1 Skyraiders were used for ground attack in the Korean War, the Lockheed AC-130 gunship was developed and deployed later, during the Vietnam War.

Related Concepts:

  • Name some aircraft used for ground attack during the Korean War.: During the Korean War, aircraft used in a ground attack capacity included the Royal Navy Hawker Sea Fury fighters and the U.S. Vought F4U Corsair and Douglas A-1 Skyraider. The source material features an image of F4U-5 Corsairs providing CAS for U.S. Marines during the Korean War.

What was one of the improvements the USAF made to its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War?

Answer: Requiring pilots to serve 80 days as forward air controllers (FACs).

Among the improvements made by the USAF to its Close Air Support coordination during the Korean War was the requirement for pilots to serve 80-day tours as forward air controllers (FACs), enhancing their understanding of ground operations.

Related Concepts:

  • What improvements did the USAF make to its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War?: Despite a rocky start, the USAF worked to improve its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War. This included requiring pilots to serve 80 days as forward air controllers (FACs) to understand ground difficulties and providing airborne FACs in critical locations. The Army also learned to assist by suppressing anti-aircraft fire before air strikes.
  • What was the United States Air Force's initial stance on CAS during the Korean War?: During the Korean War, the newly created United States Air Force (USAF) initially moved away from CAS, prioritizing strategic bombers and jet interceptors, which led to insufficient battlefield support and coordination issues.
  • What were the main flaws in CAS application revealed by the Korean War?: The Korean War revealed several flaws in CAS application: the USAF preferred interdiction over fire support while the Army prioritized support missions; the Army advocated decentralization for reactivity while the USAF favored centralization; there was a lack of joint training and culture; and jet fighters were too fast and strategic bombers too large for effective CAS.

What did the Howze Board recommend regarding CAS in the late 1950s and early 1960s?

Answer: The necessity for a helicopter-based CAS requirement.

The Howze Board's significant recommendation in the late 1950s and early 1960s was the establishment of a helicopter-based Close Air Support requirement for the U.S. Army.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Howze Board recommend regarding CAS in the late 1950s and early 1960s?: During the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Howze Board, which studied the US Army's dedicated CAS needs, published a landmark report describing the necessity for a helicopter-based CAS requirement.

What adaptations were made to Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War?

Answer: Air Force assuming responsibility for the air request net to improve communication.

During the Vietnam War, Air Force Close Air Support saw adaptations such as the Air Force taking responsibility for the air request net, which significantly improved communication and coordination.

Related Concepts:

  • What adaptations were made to Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War?: During the Vietnam War, Air Force CAS saw adaptations such as the successful replacement of propeller-driven aircraft with jets, the Air Force assuming responsibility for the air request net to improve communication, and the implementation of CAS control agencies at the corps level under Air Force control. Additionally, airborne Forward Air Controllers (FACs) were utilized, and B-52 bombers were even employed for CAS missions.
  • What system proved crucial to improving Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War?: The adaptation of the Tactical Air Control System proved crucial to the improvement of Air Force CAS during the Vietnam War, enhancing communication equipment and procedures that had long been problematic.

Which cargo aircraft was first converted into a gunship for CAS and air interdiction during the Vietnam War?

Answer: Douglas C-47 Skytrain

The Douglas C-47 Skytrain was the first cargo aircraft to be converted into a gunship, becoming the AC-47 Spooky, for Close Air Support and air interdiction roles during the Vietnam War.

Related Concepts:

  • Which aircraft were converted into gunships for CAS and air interdiction during the Vietnam War?: In the Vietnam War, the United States converted several cargo aircraft into gunships for CAS and air interdiction roles. The first was the Douglas AC-47 Spooky, converted from the Douglas C-47 Skytrain/Douglas DC-3, followed by the Fairchild AC-119 and the Lockheed AC-130.

Modern CAS: Technology and Tactics

After the Vietnam War, the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) role expanded to include terminal attack control, in addition to liaison duties.

Answer: False

After the Vietnam War, the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) role shifted, with terminal attack control duties largely being transferred to an enlisted force, allowing ALOs to focus primarily on their liaison and advisory functions.

Related Concepts:

  • What change occurred in the role of the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) after the Vietnam War?: In the mid-1970s, after the Vietnam War, the USAF decided to train an enlisted force to handle many of the tasks that the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) was saturated with, including terminal attack control. Presently, the ALO primarily serves in a liaison role, with the intricate details of mission planning and attack guidance left to the enlisted members of the Tactical Air Control Party.

Since 2001, bombers have offered advantages for CAS missions due to their longer loiter times, greater range, and larger weapon capacity.

Answer: True

Since 2001, bombers have offered significant advantages for Close Air Support missions, including extended loiter times, greater range, and substantial weapon capacity, altering U.S. doctrinal thinking.

Related Concepts:

  • What advantages do bombers offer for CAS missions, particularly since 2001?: Since 2001, bombers have offered significant advantages for CAS missions, including significantly longer loiter times, greater range, and larger weapon capacity. These attributes allow them to be deployed from bases outside the immediate battlefield area, with 12-hour missions being commonplace, and have changed U.S. doctrinal thinking regarding CAS.
  • How have large high-altitude bombers been successfully used for CAS in recent conflicts?: In recent conflicts, large high-altitude bombers like the B-1B Lancer have successfully filled CAS roles, particularly during Operation Enduring Freedom, by utilizing precision-guided munitions such as GPS-guided weapons and laser-guided JDAMs. This has evolved into a devastating tactical employment methodology.

Modern CAS relies heavily on information technology, including lasers, GPS, and battlefield data transfer, for precision air support.

Answer: True

Modern Close Air Support heavily integrates advanced information technology, such as lasers, GPS, and battlefield data transfer, to achieve precision and effective coordination across various air platforms.

Related Concepts:

  • What role does information technology play in modern CAS?: Information technology plays an increased role in modern CAS, enhancing the importance of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Technologies like lasers, GPS, and battlefield data transfer are routinely used to direct and coordinate precision air support with a wide variety of air platforms, as reflected in the 2003 joint CAS doctrine. The source material displays an image of the U.S. Army conducting tests of the Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) using an AH-64 Apache Longbow helicopter, which relies on such technology.

Air platforms can provide ground-convoy escort and enhance command and control (C2) assets in addition to direct attack.

Answer: True

Beyond direct attack, air platforms contribute to ground operations by offering aerial visual search capabilities, ground-convoy escort, and enhancing command and control (C2) assets, particularly in low-intensity conflict scenarios.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond direct attack, what additional support can air platforms provide to ground forces?: Beyond direct attack, air platforms communicating with ground forces can provide additional aerial-to-ground visual search capabilities, ground-convoy escort, and enhancement of command and control (C2) assets. These forms of support are particularly important in low-intensity conflict scenarios.

What impact did the development of anti-tank guided missiles have on CAS capabilities, as demonstrated in the 1973 Yom Kippur War?

Answer: They provided aircraft with an effective ranged anti-tank weapon.

The advent of anti-tank guided missiles, notably demonstrated in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, significantly enhanced Close Air Support capabilities by equipping aircraft with effective ranged weapons against armored targets.

Related Concepts:

  • How did anti-tank guided missiles impact CAS capabilities?: The development of anti-tank guided missiles, demonstrated with great effectiveness in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, provided aircraft with an effective ranged anti-tank weapon. These missiles enhanced CAS capabilities by allowing aircraft to engage armored targets from a safer distance.

What role does the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) primarily serve today, after the USAF trained an enlisted force for terminal attack control?

Answer: Primarily a liaison role, advising ground commanders on airpower.

With the training of an enlisted force for terminal attack control, the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) today primarily functions as a liaison, advising ground commanders on the strategic application and limitations of airpower.

Related Concepts:

  • What change occurred in the role of the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) after the Vietnam War?: In the mid-1970s, after the Vietnam War, the USAF decided to train an enlisted force to handle many of the tasks that the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) was saturated with, including terminal attack control. Presently, the ALO primarily serves in a liaison role, with the intricate details of mission planning and attack guidance left to the enlisted members of the Tactical Air Control Party.
  • What was the purpose of creating the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) position after the Korean War?: The U.S. Army's desire for a dedicated USAF presence on the battlefield to reduce fratricide (harm to friendly forces) led to the creation of the Air Liaison Officer (ALO) position. The ALO is an aeronautically rated officer who advises ground commanders on airpower capabilities and limitations.

What advantages do large high-altitude bombers like the B-1B Lancer offer for CAS missions, particularly since 2001?

Answer: Significantly longer loiter times, greater range, and larger weapon capacity.

Since 2001, large high-altitude bombers like the B-1B Lancer have provided significant advantages for Close Air Support, including extended loiter times, greater range, and increased weapon capacity, especially with precision-guided munitions.

Related Concepts:

  • What advantages do bombers offer for CAS missions, particularly since 2001?: Since 2001, bombers have offered significant advantages for CAS missions, including significantly longer loiter times, greater range, and larger weapon capacity. These attributes allow them to be deployed from bases outside the immediate battlefield area, with 12-hour missions being commonplace, and have changed U.S. doctrinal thinking regarding CAS.
  • How have large high-altitude bombers been successfully used for CAS in recent conflicts?: In recent conflicts, large high-altitude bombers like the B-1B Lancer have successfully filled CAS roles, particularly during Operation Enduring Freedom, by utilizing precision-guided munitions such as GPS-guided weapons and laser-guided JDAMs. This has evolved into a devastating tactical employment methodology.

What additional support, beyond direct attack, can air platforms provide to ground forces, especially in low-intensity conflict scenarios?

Answer: Ground-convoy escort and enhancement of command and control (C2) assets.

Beyond direct attack, air platforms can offer crucial support to ground forces, particularly in low-intensity conflicts, through capabilities such as ground-convoy escort and the enhancement of command and control (C2) assets.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond direct attack, what additional support can air platforms provide to ground forces?: Beyond direct attack, air platforms communicating with ground forces can provide additional aerial-to-ground visual search capabilities, ground-convoy escort, and enhancement of command and control (C2) assets. These forms of support are particularly important in low-intensity conflict scenarios.

What types of aircraft commonly fill close air support roles today?

Answer: Military helicopters and dedicated fighters/ground attack aircraft like the A-10 Thunderbolt II.

Today, Close Air Support roles are commonly filled by military helicopters, often integrated closely with ground operations, and dedicated ground attack aircraft such as the A-10 Thunderbolt II.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of aircraft commonly fill close air support roles today?: Today, various aircraft fill close air support roles, including military helicopters, which are often operated by the army due to their close integration with ground operations, and dedicated fighters and ground attack aircraft like the A-10 Thunderbolt II, which use rockets, missiles, bombs, and strafing runs. The source material shows U.S. Army soldiers coordinating close air support, with an AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopter visible in the background.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy