Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?

Deplatforming and Free Speech Controversies

At a Glance

Title: Deplatforming and Free Speech Controversies

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Defining Deplatforming and its Context: 2 flashcards, 2 questions
  • Historical Antecedents: Campus Speaker Bans: 9 flashcards, 11 questions
  • Contemporary Deplatforming: High-Profile Cases and Platform Responses: 21 flashcards, 36 questions
  • Legislative and Legal Frameworks for Online Speech: 6 flashcards, 10 questions
  • Ethical and Societal Debates on Deplatforming: 7 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Associated Practices: Demonetization and Harassment Tactics: 3 flashcards, 6 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 48
  • True/False Questions: 44
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 29
  • Total Questions: 73

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Deplatforming and Free Speech Controversies

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Deplatforming" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Deplatforming and Free Speech Controversies

Study Guide: Deplatforming and Free Speech Controversies

Defining Deplatforming and its Context

Deplatforming, also referred to as no-platforming, constitutes the removal of individuals or groups from platforms utilized for the dissemination of ideas, a practice frequently observed in the context of social media.

Answer: True

The definition provided accurately describes deplatforming as the removal of individuals or groups from platforms used for sharing ideas, often associated with social media.

Related Concepts:

  • What is deplatforming, and what is another term commonly used for it?: Deplatforming, also known as no-platforming, is the practice of boycotting an individual or group by removing access to platforms they utilize for sharing information or ideas. This phenomenon is frequently associated with digital environments, particularly social media.
  • In what context is the term deplatforming most commonly associated?: The term deplatforming is most commonly associated with social media platforms, referring to the removal of users or content from these digital spaces.
  • What are the primary justifications offered by supporters of deplatforming?: Supporters of deplatforming justify it as a tactic to prevent the spread of hate speech and disinformation, arguing it is an editorial responsibility for platforms and that it effectively reduces harmful content.

What is the primary definition of deplatforming as described in the source?

Answer: The practice of boycotting an individual or group by removing the platforms they use to share information or ideas.

The source defines deplatforming as the act of boycotting an individual or group by removing the platforms they use to share information or ideas.

Related Concepts:

  • What is deplatforming, and what is another term commonly used for it?: Deplatforming, also known as no-platforming, is the practice of boycotting an individual or group by removing access to platforms they utilize for sharing information or ideas. This phenomenon is frequently associated with digital environments, particularly social media.
  • In what context is the term deplatforming most commonly associated?: The term deplatforming is most commonly associated with social media platforms, referring to the removal of users or content from these digital spaces.
  • How do proponents of deplatforming address concerns about First Amendment rights in the United States?: Proponents argue that deplatforming is a legal method for dealing with controversial users online, as long as the government is not involved, distinguishing it from government censorship which is restricted by the First Amendment.

Historical Antecedents: Campus Speaker Bans

The practice of banning speakers on United States university campuses commenced in the 1970s, primarily propelled by student activism.

Answer: False

The source indicates that the practice of banning speakers on US university campuses began earlier, in the 1940s, driven by university policies rather than solely student activism.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the practice of banning speakers on university campuses in the United States begin, and who primarily carried out these bans?: The practice of banning speakers on university campuses in the United States dates back to the 1940s, and these bans were primarily implemented through the policies of the universities themselves.

The University of California's 'Speaker Ban' policy, implemented under President Robert Gordon Sproul, was intended to prevent unqualified individuals from leveraging the university's prestige for propaganda purposes.

Answer: True

The policy's stated objective was indeed to prevent the exploitation of the university's prestige by individuals or groups using it for propaganda.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the University of California's "Speaker Ban" policy, and what was its stated purpose?: The University of California had a policy known as the Speaker Ban, codified under President Robert Gordon Sproul. Its stated purpose was to prevent the exploitation of the university's prestige by unqualified persons or those using it as a platform for propaganda.

Henry A. Wallace, a former U.S. Vice President, was prohibited from speaking at UCLA in 1947 due to his advocacy for U.S. Cold War policies.

Answer: False

The source states that Henry A. Wallace was banned from speaking at UCLA in 1947 because of his views on U.S. Cold War policy, not for supporting it.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Henry A. Wallace, and why was he banned from speaking at UCLA in 1947?: Henry A. Wallace, the former U.S. Vice President, was banned from speaking at UCLA in 1947 due to his views on U.S. Cold War policy.

The British National Union of Students instituted its 'No Platform' policy in 1973.

Answer: True

The source confirms that the British National Union of Students established its 'No Platform' policy in 1973.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the "No Platform" policy, and when was it established by the British National Union of Students?: The "No Platform" policy is a stance established by the British National Union of Students as early as 1973, which involves boycotting or denying platforms to certain individuals or groups.

The University of Central Oklahoma rescinded an invitation to Ken Ham in February 2018 due to pressure from a liberal student organization.

Answer: False

The university rescinded the invitation to Ken Ham due to pressure from an LGBT student group, not a liberal student organization.

Related Concepts:

  • Which university rescinded a speaking invitation to Ken Ham in February 2018, and due to pressure from which group?: The University of Central Oklahoma rescinded a speaking invitation to creationist Ken Ham in February 2018, following pressure from an LGBT student group.

In 2019, students at the University of the Arts proposed the removal of Professor Camille Paglia and her replacement by a queer person of color.

Answer: True

Students at the University of the Arts circulated a petition in 2019 demanding the removal of Professor Camille Paglia and her replacement by a queer person of color.

Related Concepts:

  • What did students at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia demand regarding Camille Paglia in 2019?: In 2019, students at the University of the Arts circulated a petition demanding that Camille Paglia, a tenured professor, be removed from the faculty and replaced by a queer person of color.

Conor Friedersdorf noted that student activists typically refrain from employing social media callouts or urging authorities to impose sanctions against controversial speakers.

Answer: False

Friedersdorf observed that student activists commonly use social media callouts and urge authorities to impose outcomes against controversial speakers.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Conor Friedersdorf's 2019 Atlantic article, what is the "standard practice" among student activists regarding controversial speakers?: According to Conor Friedersdorf, the "standard practice" among student activists involves social media callouts, urging authorities to impose outcomes, and using antidiscrimination law to limit freedom of expression, often without regard for overall student opinion.
  • What "chilling effect" did Conor Friedersdorf observe on free speech and academic freedom due to deplatforming tactics?: Conor Friedersdorf observed a "chilling effect" on free speech and academic freedom, noting that a majority of faculty members he contacted feared speaking openly about debates on campus, even anonymously.

According to the source, when did the practice of banning speakers on university campuses in the United States primarily begin?

Answer: In the 1940s, implemented through university policies.

The source indicates that the practice of banning speakers on US university campuses began in the 1940s, primarily driven by university policies.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the practice of banning speakers on university campuses in the United States begin, and who primarily carried out these bans?: The practice of banning speakers on university campuses in the United States dates back to the 1940s, and these bans were primarily implemented through the policies of the universities themselves.
  • What was the University of California's "Speaker Ban" policy, and what was its stated purpose?: The University of California had a policy known as the Speaker Ban, codified under President Robert Gordon Sproul. Its stated purpose was to prevent the exploitation of the university's prestige by unqualified persons or those using it as a platform for propaganda.
  • Provide an example of a speaker banned under the University of California's Speaker Ban policy and the reason given.: In 1951, Max Shachtman, a socialist, was banned from speaking at the University of California at Berkeley under the Speaker Ban policy, which aimed to prevent the use of university platforms for propaganda.

What was the stated purpose of the University of California's 'Speaker Ban' policy?

Answer: To prevent the exploitation of the university's prestige by unqualified persons or those using it for propaganda.

The University of California's 'Speaker Ban' policy was designed to prevent the exploitation of the university's prestige by unqualified individuals or those using it for propaganda.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the University of California's "Speaker Ban" policy, and what was its stated purpose?: The University of California had a policy known as the Speaker Ban, codified under President Robert Gordon Sproul. Its stated purpose was to prevent the exploitation of the university's prestige by unqualified persons or those using it as a platform for propaganda.
  • When did the practice of banning speakers on university campuses in the United States begin, and who primarily carried out these bans?: The practice of banning speakers on university campuses in the United States dates back to the 1940s, and these bans were primarily implemented through the policies of the universities themselves.

Which former U.S. Vice President was banned from speaking at UCLA in 1947 due to his views on U.S. Cold War policy?

Answer: Henry A. Wallace

Henry A. Wallace, a former U.S. Vice President, was banned from speaking at UCLA in 1947 due to his stance on U.S. Cold War policy.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Henry A. Wallace, and why was he banned from speaking at UCLA in 1947?: Henry A. Wallace, the former U.S. Vice President, was banned from speaking at UCLA in 1947 due to his views on U.S. Cold War policy.

In 2019, students at the University of the Arts circulated a petition demanding the removal of Professor Camille Paglia and her replacement by whom?

Answer: A queer person of color.

Students at the University of the Arts demanded the removal of Professor Camille Paglia and her replacement by a queer person of color.

Related Concepts:

  • What did students at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia demand regarding Camille Paglia in 2019?: In 2019, students at the University of the Arts circulated a petition demanding that Camille Paglia, a tenured professor, be removed from the faculty and replaced by a queer person of color.

Contemporary Deplatforming: High-Profile Cases and Platform Responses

The film 'No Safe Spaces' chronicled the experiences of Adam Carolla and Dennis Prager concerning disinvitations and deplatforming.

Answer: True

The source confirms that the film 'No Safe Spaces' documented the experiences of Adam Carolla and Dennis Prager with disinvitations and deplatforming.

Related Concepts:

  • What film documented the experiences of Adam Carolla and Dennis Prager with disinvitations and deplatforming?: The 2019 film "No Safe Spaces" documented the experiences of Adam Carolla and Dennis Prager, among others, with disinvitation attempts and deplatforming.

Reddit commenced banning communities for contravening its anti-harassment policy in 2017.

Answer: False

Reddit began banning communities for violating its anti-harassment policy in 2015, not 2017.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Reddit begin banning communities for violating its anti-harassment policy, and what was a key finding of a 2017 study on these bans?: Reddit began banning communities for violating its anti-harassment policy starting in 2015. A 2017 study found that these bans served useful purposes for Reddit and that users who participated in banned subreddits either left or significantly reduced their hate speech.

In May 2019, Facebook and Instagram enacted bans on individuals such as Louis Farrakhan and Alex Jones.

Answer: True

The source confirms that Facebook and Instagram banned individuals including Louis Farrakhan and Alex Jones in May 2019.

Related Concepts:

  • Which social media platforms announced a ban on "dangerous individuals and organizations" in May 2019, and who were some of the individuals banned?: In May 2019, Facebook and Instagram banned "dangerous individuals and organizations," including Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, Alex Jones and InfoWars, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer, and Paul Nehlen.

Following the 2021 storming of the US Capitol, Twitter permanently banned Donald Trump's account due to its potential use for promoting further violence.

Answer: True

Twitter cited the potential for Donald Trump's account to be used to promote further violence as the reason for its permanent ban after the January 6, 2021 events.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the specific action taken by Twitter against Donald Trump's personal account, and what led to his permanent ban from the platform?: Twitter deactivated Donald Trump's personal account, stating it could be used to promote further violence. After he tweeted similar messages from the official US Government account (@POTUS), he was permanently banned on January 8, 2021.
  • In the wake of the 2021 storming of the US Capitol, which platforms deplatformed Donald Trump, and what was the stated reason for Twitter's permanent ban?: Following the 2021 storming of the US Capitol, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, and Twitter deplatformed Donald Trump to varying degrees. Twitter stated that Trump's personal account was permanently banned because it could be used to promote further violence.

Elon Musk articulated Twitter's new policy as 'freedom of reach, but not freedom of speech.'

Answer: False

Elon Musk stated Twitter's new policy was 'freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.'

Related Concepts:

  • What did Elon Musk state as the new Twitter policy regarding speech and reach?: Elon Musk stated that the new Twitter policy is "freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach."

In November 2022, Elon Musk initiated the reinstatement of previously banned Twitter accounts, including those of Kathy Griffin and Jordan Peterson.

Answer: True

The source confirms that Elon Musk began reinstating previously banned accounts, such as those of Kathy Griffin and Jordan Peterson, in November 2022.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Elon Musk do regarding previously banned Twitter accounts in November 2022?: In November 2022, as the new CEO of Twitter, Elon Musk began reinstating previously banned Twitter accounts of high-profile users, such as Kathy Griffin and Jordan Peterson, as part of a new policy.

A Twitter poll conducted by Elon Musk indicated a majority voted against reinstating Donald Trump's account.

Answer: False

The Twitter poll conducted by Elon Musk showed that a majority voted in favor of reinstating Donald Trump's account.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of Elon Musk's Twitter poll regarding the reinstatement of Donald Trump's account?: Elon Musk's Twitter poll asking users whether to reinstate Donald Trump's account concluded with 51.8% of respondents voting in favor of unbanning him.

In August 2018, Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify collectively removed Alex Jones's content and InfoWars, citing violations related to hate speech and discriminatory content.

Answer: True

The source confirms that these platforms removed Alex Jones's content in August 2018 due to policy violations, including hate speech and discriminatory content.

Related Concepts:

  • Which major platforms removed Alex Jones's content and InfoWars in August 2018, and for what general reason?: In August 2018, Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify removed all content by Alex Jones and InfoWars for policy violations, citing reasons such as hate speech and discriminatory content.
  • What specific types of content did Facebook cite as examples of hate speech for removing Alex Jones's pages?: Facebook cited instances of Alex Jones's content dehumanizing immigrants, Muslims, and transgender people, as well as glorifying violence, as examples of hate speech that led to the removal of his pages.
  • When was Alex Jones permanently banned from Twitter, and what action preceded this ban?: Alex Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in September 2018 after berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcy. This followed earlier actions where Twitter admitted InfoWars had violated its rules but remained on the platform.

Facebook cited Alex Jones's dehumanization of immigrants and glorification of violence as justifications for removing his pages.

Answer: True

Facebook specifically cited Alex Jones's content that dehumanized immigrants and glorified violence as reasons for removing his pages.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific types of content did Facebook cite as examples of hate speech for removing Alex Jones's pages?: Facebook cited instances of Alex Jones's content dehumanizing immigrants, Muslims, and transgender people, as well as glorifying violence, as examples of hate speech that led to the removal of his pages.

Alex Jones's InfoWars app was removed from the Google Play store in March 2020 for disseminating COVID-19 misinformation.

Answer: True

Google removed the InfoWars app from its Play store in March 2020, citing violations related to the dissemination of COVID-19 misinformation.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the reason given by Google for removing the InfoWars app from the Google Play store?: Google removed the InfoWars app from the Google Play store because it violated the Play policy by distributing misleading or harmful information, specifically related to COVID-19 misinformation.
  • How did Alex Jones attempt to circumvent his Facebook ban, and what happened to his InfoWars app on the Google Play store in March 2020?: Alex Jones attempted to circumvent his Facebook ban by using his website NewsWars. In March 2020, his InfoWars app was removed from the Google Play store due to claims of disseminating COVID-19 misinformation.
  • Which major platforms removed Alex Jones's content and InfoWars in August 2018, and for what general reason?: In August 2018, Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify removed all content by Alex Jones and InfoWars for policy violations, citing reasons such as hate speech and discriminatory content.

Google removed the InfoWars app due to its distribution of misleading information concerning election fraud.

Answer: False

Google removed the InfoWars app for violating Play policy by distributing COVID-19 misinformation, not for election fraud-related content.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the reason given by Google for removing the InfoWars app from the Google Play store?: Google removed the InfoWars app from the Google Play store because it violated the Play policy by distributing misleading or harmful information, specifically related to COVID-19 misinformation.

Elon Musk indicated that Alex Jones would be reinstated on Twitter, praising his business acumen.

Answer: False

Elon Musk stated that Alex Jones would not be unbanned, criticizing him for using the deaths of children for personal gain.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Elon Musk's stance on potentially unbanning Alex Jones from Twitter, and what criticism did he voice regarding Jones?: Elon Musk denied that Alex Jones would be unbanned from Twitter, criticizing him as a person who "would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame."

Roku initially permitted InfoWars on its platform based on a policy of non-curation by viewpoint but subsequently removed it following public backlash.

Answer: True

Roku initially allowed InfoWars, citing a policy against viewpoint-based curation, but later removed it due to public outcry.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the justification provided by Roku for initially allowing InfoWars on its platform, and why did they later remove it?: Roku initially stated they do not "curate or censor based on viewpoint" and that InfoWars was not in violation of their policies against unlawful content or incitement. However, following social media backlash, Roku removed InfoWars, stating they had determined it should be removed from their platform.

YouTube terminated the Resistance News channel in March 2019 for reuploading content originating from InfoWars.

Answer: True

YouTube terminated the Resistance News channel for reuploading content from InfoWars, as stated in the source.

Related Concepts:

  • What action did YouTube take against the Resistance News channel in March 2019, and why?: In March 2019, YouTube terminated the Resistance News channel because it was reuploading live streams from InfoWars.

PayPal ceased business dealings with Alex Jones's InfoWars for contravening policies related to the promotion of violence.

Answer: False

PayPal ended business dealings with InfoWars for violating policies against 'hate or discriminatory intolerance against certain communities and religions,' not specifically for promoting violence.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the reason given by PayPal for ending business dealings with Alex Jones's InfoWars?: PayPal ended business dealings with Alex Jones's InfoWars for violating the company's policies by expressing "hate or discriminatory intolerance against certain communities and religions."

Alex Jones received a permanent ban from Twitter in September 2018 following an altercation with CNN reporter Oliver Darcy.

Answer: True

Alex Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in September 2018 after berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcy.

Related Concepts:

  • When was Alex Jones permanently banned from Twitter, and what action preceded this ban?: Alex Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in September 2018 after berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcy. This followed earlier actions where Twitter admitted InfoWars had violated its rules but remained on the platform.
  • How did Alex Jones attempt to circumvent his Facebook ban, and what happened to his InfoWars app on the Google Play store in March 2020?: Alex Jones attempted to circumvent his Facebook ban by using his website NewsWars. In March 2020, his InfoWars app was removed from the Google Play store due to claims of disseminating COVID-19 misinformation.

The storming of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, resulted in five fatalities and led to criminal charges for hundreds of individuals.

Answer: True

The events of January 6, 2021, at the US Capitol resulted in five deaths and led to criminal charges for at least 400 participants.

Related Concepts:

  • What event on January 6, 2021, led to the interruption of the US Congress's electoral vote count, and what was the outcome for those involved?: The storming of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, interrupted the joint session of Congress counting Electoral College votes. This event resulted in five deaths and led to criminal charges for at least 400 people.

Twitter permanently banned Donald Trump's account on January 8, 2021, after he posted messages similar to those from the official US Government account (@POTUS).

Answer: True

Twitter permanently banned Donald Trump's account on January 8, 2021, citing that his tweets could incite further violence, particularly after he posted similar messages from the official US Government account.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the specific action taken by Twitter against Donald Trump's personal account, and what led to his permanent ban from the platform?: Twitter deactivated Donald Trump's personal account, stating it could be used to promote further violence. After he tweeted similar messages from the official US Government account (@POTUS), he was permanently banned on January 8, 2021.
  • In the wake of the 2021 storming of the US Capitol, which platforms deplatformed Donald Trump, and what was the stated reason for Twitter's permanent ban?: Following the 2021 storming of the US Capitol, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, and Twitter deplatformed Donald Trump to varying degrees. Twitter stated that Trump's personal account was permanently banned because it could be used to promote further violence.

Andrew Tate was initially banned from Twitter in 2017 for advocating positive messages regarding the #MeToo movement.

Answer: False

Andrew Tate was initially banned from Twitter in 2017 for tweeting that women should bear some responsibility regarding the #MeToo movement, not for advocating positive messages.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was Andrew Tate initially banned from Twitter in 2017?: Andrew Tate was initially banned from Twitter in 2017 for tweeting that women should "bare some responsibility" in response to the #MeToo movement.
  • Which four major social media platforms banned Andrew Tate in August 2022, and what was the stated reason for these bans?: In August 2022, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube banned Andrew Tate, citing that his misogynistic comments violated their hate speech policies.

In August 2022, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube prohibited Andrew Tate due to violations of hate speech policies concerning his misogynistic statements.

Answer: True

These platforms banned Andrew Tate in August 2022, citing his misogynistic comments as violations of their hate speech policies.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was Andrew Tate initially banned from Twitter in 2017?: Andrew Tate was initially banned from Twitter in 2017 for tweeting that women should "bare some responsibility" in response to the #MeToo movement.
  • Which four major social media platforms banned Andrew Tate in August 2022, and what was the stated reason for these bans?: In August 2022, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube banned Andrew Tate, citing that his misogynistic comments violated their hate speech policies.

Reddit began banning communities for violating its anti-harassment policy in which year?

Answer: 2015

Reddit commenced banning communities for violating its anti-harassment policy in 2015.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Reddit begin banning communities for violating its anti-harassment policy, and what was a key finding of a 2017 study on these bans?: Reddit began banning communities for violating its anti-harassment policy starting in 2015. A 2017 study found that these bans served useful purposes for Reddit and that users who participated in banned subreddits either left or significantly reduced their hate speech.

In May 2019, Facebook and Instagram banned several high-profile individuals. Which of the following was among those banned?

Answer: Louis Farrakhan

In May 2019, Facebook and Instagram banned individuals including Louis Farrakhan, Alex Jones, and others.

Related Concepts:

  • Which social media platforms announced a ban on "dangerous individuals and organizations" in May 2019, and who were some of the individuals banned?: In May 2019, Facebook and Instagram banned "dangerous individuals and organizations," including Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, Alex Jones and InfoWars, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer, and Paul Nehlen.

What was the primary reason Twitter gave for the permanent ban of Donald Trump's account following the 2021 storming of the US Capitol?

Answer: The account could be used to promote further violence.

Twitter's stated reason for the permanent ban of Donald Trump's account was that it could be used to promote further violence.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the specific action taken by Twitter against Donald Trump's personal account, and what led to his permanent ban from the platform?: Twitter deactivated Donald Trump's personal account, stating it could be used to promote further violence. After he tweeted similar messages from the official US Government account (@POTUS), he was permanently banned on January 8, 2021.
  • In the wake of the 2021 storming of the US Capitol, which platforms deplatformed Donald Trump, and what was the stated reason for Twitter's permanent ban?: Following the 2021 storming of the US Capitol, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, and Twitter deplatformed Donald Trump to varying degrees. Twitter stated that Trump's personal account was permanently banned because it could be used to promote further violence.

Elon Musk described the new Twitter policy regarding speech and reach as:

Answer: Freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.

Elon Musk stated that the new Twitter policy was 'freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.'

Related Concepts:

  • What did Elon Musk state as the new Twitter policy regarding speech and reach?: Elon Musk stated that the new Twitter policy is "freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach."

In November 2022, Elon Musk began reinstating previously banned high-profile Twitter accounts. Which of the following users had their account reinstated?

Answer: Kathy Griffin

In November 2022, Elon Musk began reinstating previously banned accounts, including that of Kathy Griffin.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Elon Musk do regarding previously banned Twitter accounts in November 2022?: In November 2022, as the new CEO of Twitter, Elon Musk began reinstating previously banned Twitter accounts of high-profile users, such as Kathy Griffin and Jordan Peterson, as part of a new policy.

What was the outcome of Elon Musk's Twitter poll regarding the reinstatement of Donald Trump's account?

Answer: 51.8% of respondents voted in favor of unbanning him.

Elon Musk's Twitter poll on reinstating Donald Trump's account concluded with 51.8% of respondents voting in favor of unbanning him.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of Elon Musk's Twitter poll regarding the reinstatement of Donald Trump's account?: Elon Musk's Twitter poll asking users whether to reinstate Donald Trump's account concluded with 51.8% of respondents voting in favor of unbanning him.

Which platforms removed Alex Jones's content and InfoWars in August 2018, citing policy violations like hate speech?

Answer: Facebook, Apple, YouTube, Spotify

Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify removed Alex Jones's content and InfoWars in August 2018, citing policy violations.

Related Concepts:

  • Which major platforms removed Alex Jones's content and InfoWars in August 2018, and for what general reason?: In August 2018, Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify removed all content by Alex Jones and InfoWars for policy violations, citing reasons such as hate speech and discriminatory content.
  • When was Alex Jones permanently banned from Twitter, and what action preceded this ban?: Alex Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in September 2018 after berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcy. This followed earlier actions where Twitter admitted InfoWars had violated its rules but remained on the platform.

Facebook cited Alex Jones's content that dehumanized specific groups and glorified violence as examples of what type of violation?

Answer: Hate speech

Facebook cited Alex Jones's content that dehumanized specific groups and glorified violence as violations of its hate speech policies.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific types of content did Facebook cite as examples of hate speech for removing Alex Jones's pages?: Facebook cited instances of Alex Jones's content dehumanizing immigrants, Muslims, and transgender people, as well as glorifying violence, as examples of hate speech that led to the removal of his pages.

Alex Jones's InfoWars app was removed from the Google Play store in March 2020 primarily due to:

Answer: Disseminating COVID-19 misinformation.

The InfoWars app was removed from the Google Play store due to violations related to the dissemination of COVID-19 misinformation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Alex Jones attempt to circumvent his Facebook ban, and what happened to his InfoWars app on the Google Play store in March 2020?: Alex Jones attempted to circumvent his Facebook ban by using his website NewsWars. In March 2020, his InfoWars app was removed from the Google Play store due to claims of disseminating COVID-19 misinformation.
  • What was the reason given by Google for removing the InfoWars app from the Google Play store?: Google removed the InfoWars app from the Google Play store because it violated the Play policy by distributing misleading or harmful information, specifically related to COVID-19 misinformation.

What criticism did Elon Musk voice regarding Alex Jones in the context of potential Twitter reinstatement?

Answer: Jones used the deaths of children for personal gain, politics, or fame.

Elon Musk criticized Alex Jones for using the deaths of children for personal gain, politics, or fame.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Elon Musk's stance on potentially unbanning Alex Jones from Twitter, and what criticism did he voice regarding Jones?: Elon Musk denied that Alex Jones would be unbanned from Twitter, criticizing him as a person who "would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame."

Roku initially justified allowing InfoWars on its platform by stating they do not curate or censor based on what?

Answer: Viewpoint

Roku initially stated they do not curate or censor based on viewpoint when justifying allowing InfoWars on their platform.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the justification provided by Roku for initially allowing InfoWars on its platform, and why did they later remove it?: Roku initially stated they do not "curate or censor based on viewpoint" and that InfoWars was not in violation of their policies against unlawful content or incitement. However, following social media backlash, Roku removed InfoWars, stating they had determined it should be removed from their platform.

YouTube terminated the Resistance News channel in March 2019 because the channel was primarily doing what?

Answer: Reuploading content from InfoWars.

YouTube terminated the Resistance News channel for reuploading content from InfoWars.

Related Concepts:

  • What action did YouTube take against the Resistance News channel in March 2019, and why?: In March 2019, YouTube terminated the Resistance News channel because it was reuploading live streams from InfoWars.

PayPal ended business dealings with Alex Jones's InfoWars for violating policies related to:

Answer: Hate or discriminatory intolerance against certain communities and religions.

PayPal ended business dealings with InfoWars for violating policies against hate or discriminatory intolerance against certain communities and religions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the reason given by PayPal for ending business dealings with Alex Jones's InfoWars?: PayPal ended business dealings with Alex Jones's InfoWars for violating the company's policies by expressing "hate or discriminatory intolerance against certain communities and religions."

Alex Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in September 2018 following an incident where he did what?

Answer: Berated CNN reporter Oliver Darcy.

Alex Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in September 2018 after berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcy.

Related Concepts:

  • When was Alex Jones permanently banned from Twitter, and what action preceded this ban?: Alex Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in September 2018 after berating CNN reporter Oliver Darcy. This followed earlier actions where Twitter admitted InfoWars had violated its rules but remained on the platform.
  • Which major platforms removed Alex Jones's content and InfoWars in August 2018, and for what general reason?: In August 2018, Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify removed all content by Alex Jones and InfoWars for policy violations, citing reasons such as hate speech and discriminatory content.
  • How did Alex Jones attempt to circumvent his Facebook ban, and what happened to his InfoWars app on the Google Play store in March 2020?: Alex Jones attempted to circumvent his Facebook ban by using his website NewsWars. In March 2020, his InfoWars app was removed from the Google Play store due to claims of disseminating COVID-19 misinformation.

Why was Andrew Tate initially banned from Twitter in 2017?

Answer: For tweeting that women should bear some responsibility regarding the #MeToo movement.

Andrew Tate was initially banned from Twitter in 2017 for tweeting that women should bear some responsibility in response to the #MeToo movement.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was Andrew Tate initially banned from Twitter in 2017?: Andrew Tate was initially banned from Twitter in 2017 for tweeting that women should "bare some responsibility" in response to the #MeToo movement.
  • Which four major social media platforms banned Andrew Tate in August 2022, and what was the stated reason for these bans?: In August 2022, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube banned Andrew Tate, citing that his misogynistic comments violated their hate speech policies.

In August 2022, which four major social media platforms banned Andrew Tate citing his misogynistic comments?

Answer: Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube

In August 2022, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube banned Andrew Tate, citing his misogynistic comments as violations of hate speech policies.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was Andrew Tate initially banned from Twitter in 2017?: Andrew Tate was initially banned from Twitter in 2017 for tweeting that women should "bare some responsibility" in response to the #MeToo movement.
  • Which four major social media platforms banned Andrew Tate in August 2022, and what was the stated reason for these bans?: In August 2022, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube banned Andrew Tate, citing that his misogynistic comments violated their hate speech policies.

Legislative and Legal Frameworks for Online Speech

As of February 2020, FIRE had documented over 500 instances of disinvitation or disruption attempts on American campuses since the year 2000.

Answer: False

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) had documented precisely 469 such attempts as of February 2020, not over 500.

Related Concepts:

  • According to FIRE, how many disinvitation or disruption attempts at American campuses had been documented since 2000 as of February 2020?: As of February 2020, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) had documented 469 disinvitation or disruption attempts at American campuses since the year 2000.

FIRE categorizes successful disinvitations exclusively as formal disinvitations issued by the sponsoring entity.

Answer: False

FIRE categorizes successful disinvitations into three types: formal disinvitation by the sponsor, speaker withdrawal due to demands, and 'heckler's vetoes' where disruptions prevent speaking.

Related Concepts:

  • How does FIRE categorize successful disinvitations in its database?: FIRE categorizes successful disinvitations into three subcategories: formal disinvitation by the sponsor, the speaker's withdrawal due to demands, and "heckler's vetoes" where disruptions prevent the speaker from speaking.

The UK government's Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill aimed to impose financial penalties on universities that promoted no-platforming practices.

Answer: True

The bill intended to allow speakers to seek compensation for no-platforming and to fine universities and student unions that promoted it.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the UK government's Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill announced in May 2021 intended to do regarding no-platforming?: The UK government's Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill, announced in May 2021, aimed to allow speakers at universities to seek compensation for no-platforming, impose fines on universities and student unions promoting it, and establish an ombudsman to monitor such cases.

The UK's Online Safety Bill intended to permit social media networks to engage in discrimination against specific political viewpoints.

Answer: False

The UK's Online Safety Bill aimed to prohibit social media networks from discriminating against specific political views or removing 'democratically important' content.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the UK's Online Safety Bill aim to prohibit social media networks from doing concerning political views and content?: The UK's Online Safety Bill aimed to prohibit social media networks from discriminating against specific political views or removing content considered "democratically important," such as comments related to political parties and policies.

Critics suggest treating social media platforms as public utilities in the United States to safeguard users' constitutional rights against deplatforming.

Answer: True

The proposal to treat social media as a public utility is suggested by critics to protect constitutional rights, arguing that online presence is essential for societal participation.

Related Concepts:

  • What proposal have critics of deplatforming suggested regarding social media platforms in the United States to protect users' constitutional rights?: Some critics of deplatforming have proposed treating social media as a public utility in the United States to ensure constitutional rights are protected, arguing that an internet presence is essential for participation in modern society.

Republican politicians in the U.S. have advocated for strengthening Section 230 protections, asserting that social networks' moderation practices are biased.

Answer: False

Republican politicians have sought to weaken Section 230 protections, alleging that social networks' moderation policies are not politically neutral.

Related Concepts:

  • What legal protection for internet platforms is being targeted by Republican politicians in the US, and why?: Republican politicians in the US have sought to weaken protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, alleging that the moderation policies of major social networks are not politically neutral.

According to FIRE, how many disinvitation or disruption attempts at American campuses had been documented since 2000, as of February 2020?

Answer: Exactly 469

As of February 2020, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) had documented 469 disinvitation or disruption attempts at American campuses since the year 2000.

Related Concepts:

  • According to FIRE, how many disinvitation or disruption attempts at American campuses had been documented since 2000 as of February 2020?: As of February 2020, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) had documented 469 disinvitation or disruption attempts at American campuses since the year 2000.

Which of the following is NOT one of the ways FIRE categorizes successful disinvitations in its database?

Answer: Temporary suspension of the speaker's social media account.

FIRE categorizes disinvitations as formal disinvitations, speaker withdrawals, or 'heckler's vetoes,' not temporary suspension of social media accounts.

Related Concepts:

  • How does FIRE categorize successful disinvitations in its database?: FIRE categorizes successful disinvitations into three subcategories: formal disinvitation by the sponsor, the speaker's withdrawal due to demands, and "heckler's vetoes" where disruptions prevent the speaker from speaking.

What was a key aim of the UK government's Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill announced in May 2021?

Answer: To allow speakers to seek compensation for no-platforming and fine universities promoting it.

The UK's Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill aimed to allow speakers to seek compensation for no-platforming and to impose fines on universities promoting it.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the UK government's Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill announced in May 2021 intended to do regarding no-platforming?: The UK government's Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill, announced in May 2021, aimed to allow speakers at universities to seek compensation for no-platforming, impose fines on universities and student unions promoting it, and establish an ombudsman to monitor such cases.

Republican politicians in the US have targeted Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, alleging that major social networks' moderation policies are:

Answer: Not politically neutral.

Republican politicians have targeted Section 230, alleging that social networks' moderation policies are not politically neutral.

Related Concepts:

  • What legal protection for internet platforms is being targeted by Republican politicians in the US, and why?: Republican politicians in the US have sought to weaken protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, alleging that the moderation policies of major social networks are not politically neutral.

Ethical and Societal Debates on Deplatforming

The San Francisco punk magazine Maximum Rocknroll declared a policy against bands exhibiting Nazi ideology in December 2017.

Answer: False

Maximum Rocknroll announced a strict policy against bands with Nazi ideology, not communist ideology.

Related Concepts:

  • What policy did the San Francisco punk magazine Maximum Rocknroll announce in December 2017 regarding bands and artists with Nazi ideology?: In December 2017, Maximum Rocknroll announced it has "a strict no-platform policy towards any bands and artists with a Nazi ideology" after discovering a previously reviewed artist was a neo-Nazi.

Proponents of deplatforming contend that it is a necessary measure to impede the proliferation of hate speech and disinformation.

Answer: True

Supporters justify deplatforming as a means to prevent the spread of hate speech and disinformation, viewing it as an editorial responsibility of platforms.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary justifications offered by supporters of deplatforming?: Supporters of deplatforming justify it as a tactic to prevent the spread of hate speech and disinformation, arguing it is an editorial responsibility for platforms and that it effectively reduces harmful content.
  • What proposal have critics of deplatforming suggested regarding social media platforms in the United States to protect users' constitutional rights?: Some critics of deplatforming have proposed treating social media as a public utility in the United States to ensure constitutional rights are protected, arguing that an internet presence is essential for participation in modern society.
  • How do proponents of deplatforming address concerns about First Amendment rights in the United States?: Proponents argue that deplatforming is a legal method for dealing with controversial users online, as long as the government is not involved, distinguishing it from government censorship which is restricted by the First Amendment.

Advocates of deplatforming argue that actions taken by private companies constitute a violation of the First Amendment.

Answer: False

Proponents argue that deplatforming by private companies is permissible, distinguishing it from government censorship which is restricted by the First Amendment.

Related Concepts:

  • How do proponents of deplatforming address concerns about First Amendment rights in the United States?: Proponents argue that deplatforming is a legal method for dealing with controversial users online, as long as the government is not involved, distinguishing it from government censorship which is restricted by the First Amendment.
  • What proposal have critics of deplatforming suggested regarding social media platforms in the United States to protect users' constitutional rights?: Some critics of deplatforming have proposed treating social media as a public utility in the United States to ensure constitutional rights are protected, arguing that an internet presence is essential for participation in modern society.
  • What is deplatforming, and what is another term commonly used for it?: Deplatforming, also known as no-platforming, is the practice of boycotting an individual or group by removing access to platforms they utilize for sharing information or ideas. This phenomenon is frequently associated with digital environments, particularly social media.

Audie Cornish posited that private companies, unlike governmental entities, are legally precluded from silencing speech on their proprietary platforms.

Answer: False

Audie Cornish noted the opposite: private companies, unlike the government, *can* legally silence speech on their own platforms.

Related Concepts:

  • What distinction does Audie Cornish make between government silencing and private company actions regarding speech?: Audie Cornish noted that while the government cannot silence speech on a public street corner, private companies can silence speech on platforms they create, highlighting the difference in legal protections.

Declan McCullagh observed around 2018 that Silicon Valley corporations generally exhibited reluctance in denying service to users holding dissenting opinions.

Answer: False

Declan McCullagh observed that Silicon Valley companies began denying service to selected users around 2018, often devising excuses to suspend ideologically disfavored accounts.

Related Concepts:

  • What did technology journalist Declan McCullagh observe about Silicon Valley's actions regarding dissenting opinions around 2018?: Declan McCullagh observed that Silicon Valley companies like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube began denying service to selected users around 2018, devising "excuses to suspend ideologically disfavored accounts."

Glenn Reynolds characterized 2018 as the 'Year of Deplatforming' and criticized major internet platforms for restricting access for certain individuals and ideas.

Answer: True

Glenn Reynolds indeed labeled 2018 the 'Year of Deplatforming' in The Wall Street Journal, criticizing internet giants for restricting access.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Glenn Reynolds dub 2018 in an article for The Wall Street Journal, and what did he criticize?: Glenn Reynolds dubbed 2018 the "Year of Deplatforming" in The Wall Street Journal, criticizing "internet giants" for "slam[ming] the gates on a number of people and ideas they don't like."

Conor Friedersdorf identified a 'chilling effect' on free speech and academic discourse resulting from deplatforming tactics, impacting faculty's willingness to engage in open discussion.

Answer: True

Friedersdorf observed that deplatforming tactics created a 'chilling effect,' causing many faculty members to fear open discussion, even anonymously.

Related Concepts:

  • What "chilling effect" did Conor Friedersdorf observe on free speech and academic freedom due to deplatforming tactics?: Conor Friedersdorf observed a "chilling effect" on free speech and academic freedom, noting that a majority of faculty members he contacted feared speaking openly about debates on campus, even anonymously.

The San Francisco punk magazine Maximum Rocknroll announced a strict policy against which type of ideology in bands and artists in December 2017?

Answer: Nazi ideology

Maximum Rocknroll announced a strict policy against bands and artists with Nazi ideology in December 2017.

Related Concepts:

  • What policy did the San Francisco punk magazine Maximum Rocknroll announce in December 2017 regarding bands and artists with Nazi ideology?: In December 2017, Maximum Rocknroll announced it has "a strict no-platform policy towards any bands and artists with a Nazi ideology" after discovering a previously reviewed artist was a neo-Nazi.

Associated Practices: Demonetization and Harassment Tactics

Demonetization on platforms such as YouTube implies that content creators receive no remuneration, even if the content remains accessible to the public.

Answer: True

Demonetization means that creators do not receive compensation for advertising revenue, even if their content remains viewable on the platform.

Related Concepts:

  • What is "demonetization" in the context of social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram?: Demonetization, in the context of platforms like YouTube and Instagram, occurs when content is deemed inappropriate for advertising revenue, meaning the content creator receives no compensation, even though the content remains available for public viewing.
  • According to a Vox report in September 2016, how did YouTube's automatic demonetization process function?: According to Vox in September 2016, YouTube's software automatically "demonetized" some videos it deemed unfriendly to advertisers, a process many creators were unaware of until YouTube began notifying them.

According to a 2016 Vox report, YouTube's automated demonetization process consistently provided advance notification to creators regarding potentially unsuitable content.

Answer: False

The Vox report indicated that YouTube's automatic demonetization often occurred without prior creator awareness or notification.

Related Concepts:

  • According to a Vox report in September 2016, how did YouTube's automatic demonetization process function?: According to Vox in September 2016, YouTube's software automatically "demonetized" some videos it deemed unfriendly to advertisers, a process many creators were unaware of until YouTube began notifying them.

Deplatforming strategies involving personal harassment encompass doxing and the execution of false emergency reports, commonly known as swatting.

Answer: True

The source identifies doxing and making false emergency reports (swatting) as tactics used in deplatforming that involve personal harassment.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some of the tactics used in deplatforming that involve personal harassment?: Deplatforming tactics involving personal harassment include doxing, making false emergency reports for swatting, and lodging complaints or petitions to third parties, sometimes aiming to get individuals blacklisted or fired.

What does 'demonetization' mean in the context of platforms like YouTube and Instagram, according to the source?

Answer: The creator receives no compensation for advertising revenue, though the content remains viewable.

Demonetization means that content creators receive no compensation for advertising revenue, even if the content remains viewable on the platform.

Related Concepts:

  • What is "demonetization" in the context of social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram?: Demonetization, in the context of platforms like YouTube and Instagram, occurs when content is deemed inappropriate for advertising revenue, meaning the content creator receives no compensation, even though the content remains available for public viewing.

According to a 2016 Vox report, how did YouTube's automatic demonetization process affect creators?

Answer: It automatically demonetized videos deemed unfriendly to advertisers, often without prior creator awareness.

A 2016 Vox report stated that YouTube's automatic demonetization often occurred without prior creator awareness, demonetizing videos deemed unfriendly to advertisers.

Related Concepts:

  • According to a Vox report in September 2016, how did YouTube's automatic demonetization process function?: According to Vox in September 2016, YouTube's software automatically "demonetized" some videos it deemed unfriendly to advertisers, a process many creators were unaware of until YouTube began notifying them.

Which of the following is cited in the source as a tactic used in deplatforming that involves personal harassment?

Answer: Doxing and making false emergency reports (swatting).

Doxing and making false emergency reports (swatting) are cited as tactics used in deplatforming that involve personal harassment.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some of the tactics used in deplatforming that involve personal harassment?: Deplatforming tactics involving personal harassment include doxing, making false emergency reports for swatting, and lodging complaints or petitions to third parties, sometimes aiming to get individuals blacklisted or fired.
  • What is deplatforming, and what is another term commonly used for it?: Deplatforming, also known as no-platforming, is the practice of boycotting an individual or group by removing access to platforms they utilize for sharing information or ideas. This phenomenon is frequently associated with digital environments, particularly social media.
  • In what context is the term deplatforming most commonly associated?: The term deplatforming is most commonly associated with social media platforms, referring to the removal of users or content from these digital spaces.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy