Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


The Establishment and Administration of Transjordan

At a Glance

Title: The Establishment and Administration of Transjordan

Total Categories: 7

Category Stats

  • Origins and Establishment of the Emirate (1920-1921): 13 flashcards, 19 questions
  • The British Mandate and Administration: 13 flashcards, 20 questions
  • Key International Agreements and Diplomacy: 3 flashcards, 5 questions
  • Internal Governance and Security: 3 flashcards, 5 questions
  • Territorial Definition and Borders: 4 flashcards, 7 questions
  • Transition to Independence and Kingdomhood (1920s-1946): 10 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Socio-Demographic Aspects: 8 flashcards, 10 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 54
  • True/False Questions: 52
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 29
  • Total Questions: 81

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The Establishment and Administration of Transjordan

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Emirate of Transjordan" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The Establishment and Administration of Transjordan

Study Guide: The Establishment and Administration of Transjordan

Origins and Establishment of the Emirate (1920-1921)

The British protectorate established east of the Jordan River, existing from 1921 to 1946, was officially designated the Kingdom of Transjordan.

Answer: False

The entity established east of the Jordan River in 1921 was officially known as the Emirate of Transjordan. It transitioned to the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan in 1946, not from its inception.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921, and later transitioned into the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan in 1946.

Answer: True

The Emirate of Transjordan was indeed officially established on April 11, 1921. Subsequently, in 1946, it underwent a transformation into the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan, marking its independence.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
  • What was the name of the state established on May 25, 1946, and what significant political change occurred in its official name in 1949?: On May 25, 1946, the Emirate became the "Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan," with its ruler, Abdullah, taking the title of King. In 1949, after annexing the West Bank, the country's official name was changed to the "Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan," commonly known as Jordan.

Immediately following World War I, Transjordan was administered as part of OETA East before gaining de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

Answer: True

Post-World War I, the region east of the Jordan River was initially part of OETA East. Following the British withdrawal from OETA East in 1919, it was recognized de facto as part of the Arab Kingdom of Syria, which was then under Hashemite rule.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

The Battle of Maysalun in July 1920 led to the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria, causing Transjordan to become a 'no man's land' and prompting the British administration in Palestine to avoid connecting it to Palestine.

Answer: True

The defeat of the Arab Kingdom of Syria at the Battle of Maysalun in July 1920 resulted in Transjordan becoming a politically undefined territory. Consequently, the British administration in Palestine deliberately refrained from establishing any formal link between Transjordan and Palestine.

Related Concepts:

  • What event led to Transjordan becoming a "no man's land" in July 1920, and what was the British stance regarding its connection to Palestine at that time?: The Battle of Maysalun in July 1920 caused the Arab Kingdom of Syria to collapse, leaving Transjordan in a state of political uncertainty, described as a "no man's land." During this period, the British administration in Mandatory Palestine deliberately avoided establishing any definite connection between Transjordan and Palestine.
  • What was the British government's initial approach to administering Transjordan after the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria in 1920?: Following the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria at the Battle of Maysalun, Transjordan became a "no man's land." The British High Commissioner for Palestine, Herbert Samuel, initially had his request to extend the frontier of British territory beyond the Jordan River and bring Transjordan under his administration rejected. Instead, Lord Curzon proposed advancing British influence through political officers to encourage self-government.

Abdullah bin Hussein, son of Faisal bin Hussein, was appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921 after agreeing to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine.

Answer: False

Abdullah bin Hussein was the son of Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca, and the brother of Faisal bin Hussein. He was appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921, agreeing to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Abdullah bin Hussein, and what role did he play in the formation of the Emirate of Transjordan?: Abdullah bin Hussein was the elder son of Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca, and the brother of Faisal bin Hussein. He entered the Transjordan region in November 1920 and, following a conference with the British in March 1921, agreed to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine. He was subsequently appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921, establishing his government on April 11, 1921.
  • What was the initial duration specified for Emir Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan?: Upon his appointment as Emir in April 1921, Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan was initially set for a period of six months. However, this arrangement extended throughout his lifetime, solidifying Hashemite rule in the territory.
  • How did Abdullah bin Hussein assert control over Transjordan in late 1920 and early 1921?: Abdullah bin Hussein arrived in Ma'an in November 1920 with an army of 300 men. Without facing significant opposition, he and his forces effectively occupied most of Transjordan by March 1921, establishing his authority in the region.

The Cairo Conference in March 1921 resulted in the decision to offer the throne of Transjordan to Abdullah bin Hussein, establishing an autonomous governing system under the British Mandate for Palestine.

Answer: True

The Cairo Conference of March 1921 was instrumental in shaping Transjordan's future. It led to the proposal for Abdullah bin Hussein to assume leadership, establishing an autonomous administration operating within the framework of the British Mandate for Palestine.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Cairo Conference in March 1921 concerning the administration of Transjordan?: The Cairo Conference, convened by Winston Churchill, was pivotal in shaping the future of Transjordan. It resulted in the decision to offer the throne of Transjordan to Abdullah bin Hussein, who would administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine, establishing an autonomous governing system. This conference effectively laid the political groundwork for the Emirate.
  • What was the stated purpose of the British government's policy regarding Transjordan's administration, as articulated in a March 1921 memorandum?: A British memorandum prior to the Cairo Conference stated that Transjordan should be treated as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine," while simultaneously preserving its Arab character and administration. This approach aimed to manage the territory while respecting British commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the outcome of the meeting between Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem regarding Transjordan's status?: Following the Cairo Conference, Winston Churchill met with Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem. They mutually agreed that Transjordan would be accepted into the Palestine mandatory area but as a separate Arab country, distinct from Palestine. Crucially, it was stipulated that Transjordan would not form part of the Jewish national home to be established west of the Jordan River.

Under the Ottoman Empire, Transjordan was primarily administered as a single district known as the Sanjak of Transjordan.

Answer: False

The Ottoman administration did not designate a single district named the Sanjak of Transjordan. The region was divided into various sanjaks, such as Hauran and Ma'an, within the broader Syria Vilayet.

Related Concepts:

  • How was Transjordan administered under the Ottoman Empire prior to World War I?: Under the Ottoman Empire, most of Transjordan was part of the Syria Vilayet, primarily falling under the sanjaks of Hauran and Ma'an. There was no single Ottoman district named Transjordan; instead, the area was divided into districts such as Ajlun, al-Balqa, al-Karak, and Ma'an. The Tanzimat reforms had begun laying the groundwork for state formation during the latter half of the 19th century.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

The Hejaz railway, completed in 1908, extended Ottoman administrative reach southward into the Transjordan region and facilitated the Hajj pilgrimage.

Answer: True

The completion of the Hejaz railway in 1908 significantly enhanced the Ottoman Empire's administrative and military presence in the Transjordan region. It also played a crucial role in facilitating the annual Hajj pilgrimage.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Hejaz railway in the context of Ottoman rule in Transjordan?: The Hejaz railway, completed in 1908, played a significant role by facilitating the Hajj pilgrimage along the Syrian route from Damascus. It also extended the Ottoman military and administrative reach southward into the Transjordan region.

Abdullah bin Hussein arrived in Ma'an in November 1920 with a small force and, without significant opposition, occupied most of Transjordan by March 1921.

Answer: True

Abdullah bin Hussein entered Ma'an in November 1920 with approximately 300 men. His forces effectively secured control over the majority of Transjordan by March 1921, encountering minimal resistance.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Abdullah bin Hussein assert control over Transjordan in late 1920 and early 1921?: Abdullah bin Hussein arrived in Ma'an in November 1920 with an army of 300 men. Without facing significant opposition, he and his forces effectively occupied most of Transjordan by March 1921, establishing his authority in the region.
  • Who was Abdullah bin Hussein, and what role did he play in the formation of the Emirate of Transjordan?: Abdullah bin Hussein was the elder son of Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca, and the brother of Faisal bin Hussein. He entered the Transjordan region in November 1920 and, following a conference with the British in March 1921, agreed to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine. He was subsequently appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921, establishing his government on April 11, 1921.
  • What was the initial duration specified for Emir Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan?: Upon his appointment as Emir in April 1921, Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan was initially set for a period of six months. However, this arrangement extended throughout his lifetime, solidifying Hashemite rule in the territory.

T. E. Lawrence played a key role in establishing the administrative boundaries of the Emirate of Transjordan after World War I.

Answer: False

While T. E. Lawrence was instrumental in supporting the Arab Revolt and influencing the post-war political landscape, his direct role in establishing the specific administrative boundaries of the Emirate of Transjordan is not as prominent as other figures involved in the mandate negotiations.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the role of T. E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) in the context of Transjordan's history?: T. E. Lawrence assisted the Sharif of Mecca, Hussein bin Ali, during the Arab Revolt against Ottoman rule. His involvement contributed to the Ottoman defeat and the subsequent political arrangements in the region, including the establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan under Hussein's son, Abdullah.
  • Who was Abdullah bin Hussein, and what role did he play in the formation of the Emirate of Transjordan?: Abdullah bin Hussein was the elder son of Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca, and the brother of Faisal bin Hussein. He entered the Transjordan region in November 1920 and, following a conference with the British in March 1921, agreed to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine. He was subsequently appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921, establishing his government on April 11, 1921.

The "Hashemite solution" involved placing members of the Hashemite dynasty in charge of administering territories like Transjordan to partially fulfill British wartime promises to Arabs.

Answer: True

The "Hashemite solution" was a British strategy to appoint members of the Hashemite family, such as Abdullah bin Hussein, to govern territories like Transjordan. This approach served to partially honor British commitments to Arab independence made during World War I while maintaining British influence.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the nature of the "Hashemite solution" mentioned in relation to the creation of Transjordan?: The "Hashemite solution" referred to the British strategy of placing members of the Hashemite dynasty, specifically Abdullah bin Hussein, in charge of administering territories like Transjordan. This approach aimed to fulfill, at least partially, Britain's wartime promises to the Arabs while maintaining British influence and control through the mandate system.
  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.

The Hashemite dynasty ruled both the Emirate of Transjordan and Mandatory Egypt.

Answer: False

While the Hashemite dynasty ruled the Emirate of Transjordan and also held influence in Mandatory Iraq, they did not rule Mandatory Egypt.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the nature of the relationship between Transjordan and Mandatory Iraq under Hashemite rule?: The Hashemite dynasty ruled both the Emirate of Transjordan and the neighboring Mandatory Iraq. This shared dynastic rule created a connection between the two territories, although they were administered under separate mandates.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

Emir Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan was initially set for a period of ten years.

Answer: False

Emir Abdullah's initial appointment in April 1921 was for a nominal rule of six months. This arrangement, however, extended throughout his lifetime, establishing enduring Hashemite governance.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the initial duration specified for Emir Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan?: Upon his appointment as Emir in April 1921, Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan was initially set for a period of six months. However, this arrangement extended throughout his lifetime, solidifying Hashemite rule in the territory.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • Who was Abdullah bin Hussein, and what role did he play in the formation of the Emirate of Transjordan?: Abdullah bin Hussein was the elder son of Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca, and the brother of Faisal bin Hussein. He entered the Transjordan region in November 1920 and, following a conference with the British in March 1921, agreed to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine. He was subsequently appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921, establishing his government on April 11, 1921.

What was the official designation of the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River, and what was its period of existence?

Answer: The Emirate of Transjordan, 1921-1946

The entity established east of the Jordan River was officially known as the Emirate of Transjordan, functioning under British administration from 1921 until its transition to the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan in 1946.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

Which event in July 1920 led to Transjordan becoming a 'no man's land' and influenced the British stance on its connection to Palestine?

Answer: The Battle of Maysalun

The collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria following the Battle of Maysalun in July 1920 created a power vacuum, rendering Transjordan a 'no man's land' and prompting the British administration in Palestine to maintain a deliberate distance from its affairs.

Related Concepts:

  • What event led to Transjordan becoming a "no man's land" in July 1920, and what was the British stance regarding its connection to Palestine at that time?: The Battle of Maysalun in July 1920 caused the Arab Kingdom of Syria to collapse, leaving Transjordan in a state of political uncertainty, described as a "no man's land." During this period, the British administration in Mandatory Palestine deliberately avoided establishing any definite connection between Transjordan and Palestine.
  • What was the British government's initial approach to administering Transjordan after the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria in 1920?: Following the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria at the Battle of Maysalun, Transjordan became a "no man's land." The British High Commissioner for Palestine, Herbert Samuel, initially had his request to extend the frontier of British territory beyond the Jordan River and bring Transjordan under his administration rejected. Instead, Lord Curzon proposed advancing British influence through political officers to encourage self-government.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

Who was Abdullah bin Hussein, and what was his primary role in the formation of the Emirate of Transjordan?

Answer: He was the son of Hussein bin Ali who agreed to administer the territory under the British Mandate and was appointed Emir.

Abdullah bin Hussein, son of Hussein bin Ali, was appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921. He agreed to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine, thereby playing a central role in the formation of the Emirate.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Abdullah bin Hussein, and what role did he play in the formation of the Emirate of Transjordan?: Abdullah bin Hussein was the elder son of Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca, and the brother of Faisal bin Hussein. He entered the Transjordan region in November 1920 and, following a conference with the British in March 1921, agreed to administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine. He was subsequently appointed Emir of Transjordan in April 1921, establishing his government on April 11, 1921.
  • What was the initial duration specified for Emir Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan?: Upon his appointment as Emir in April 1921, Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan was initially set for a period of six months. However, this arrangement extended throughout his lifetime, solidifying Hashemite rule in the territory.
  • How did Abdullah bin Hussein assert control over Transjordan in late 1920 and early 1921?: Abdullah bin Hussein arrived in Ma'an in November 1920 with an army of 300 men. Without facing significant opposition, he and his forces effectively occupied most of Transjordan by March 1921, establishing his authority in the region.

What significant decision was made at the Cairo Conference in March 1921 regarding Transjordan?

Answer: To offer the throne of Transjordan to Abdullah bin Hussein under the British Mandate.

The Cairo Conference in March 1921 resulted in the pivotal decision to offer the leadership of Transjordan to Abdullah bin Hussein, establishing an autonomous administration under the auspices of the British Mandate for Palestine.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Cairo Conference in March 1921 concerning the administration of Transjordan?: The Cairo Conference, convened by Winston Churchill, was pivotal in shaping the future of Transjordan. It resulted in the decision to offer the throne of Transjordan to Abdullah bin Hussein, who would administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine, establishing an autonomous governing system. This conference effectively laid the political groundwork for the Emirate.
  • What was the outcome of the meeting between Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem regarding Transjordan's status?: Following the Cairo Conference, Winston Churchill met with Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem. They mutually agreed that Transjordan would be accepted into the Palestine mandatory area but as a separate Arab country, distinct from Palestine. Crucially, it was stipulated that Transjordan would not form part of the Jewish national home to be established west of the Jordan River.
  • What was the stated purpose of the British government's policy regarding Transjordan's administration, as articulated in a March 1921 memorandum?: A British memorandum prior to the Cairo Conference stated that Transjordan should be treated as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine," while simultaneously preserving its Arab character and administration. This approach aimed to manage the territory while respecting British commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

What was the primary function of the Hejaz railway completed in 1908 in the Transjordan region?

Answer: To extend Ottoman military and administrative reach and aid the Hajj pilgrimage.

The Hejaz railway, completed in 1908, served a dual purpose: enhancing Ottoman administrative and military capabilities in the region and significantly facilitating the Hajj pilgrimage route from Damascus southward.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Hejaz railway in the context of Ottoman rule in Transjordan?: The Hejaz railway, completed in 1908, played a significant role by facilitating the Hajj pilgrimage along the Syrian route from Damascus. It also extended the Ottoman military and administrative reach southward into the Transjordan region.

The "Hashemite solution" referred to the British strategy of:

Answer: Placing members of the Hashemite dynasty in charge of administering territories like Transjordan.

The "Hashemite solution" was a British policy that involved appointing members of the Hashemite dynasty, such as Abdullah bin Hussein, to govern territories like Transjordan, thereby partially fulfilling promises of Arab self-rule.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the nature of the "Hashemite solution" mentioned in relation to the creation of Transjordan?: The "Hashemite solution" referred to the British strategy of placing members of the Hashemite dynasty, specifically Abdullah bin Hussein, in charge of administering territories like Transjordan. This approach aimed to fulfill, at least partially, Britain's wartime promises to the Arabs while maintaining British influence and control through the mandate system.

The British Mandate and Administration

Following the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria, the British High Commissioner for Palestine, Herbert Samuel, successfully extended his administration into Transjordan.

Answer: False

Herbert Samuel's request to extend his administration into Transjordan after the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria was initially rejected. British policy favored encouraging self-governance through political officers rather than direct administration by the High Commissioner for Palestine.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the British government's initial approach to administering Transjordan after the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria in 1920?: Following the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria at the Battle of Maysalun, Transjordan became a "no man's land." The British High Commissioner for Palestine, Herbert Samuel, initially had his request to extend the frontier of British territory beyond the Jordan River and bring Transjordan under his administration rejected. Instead, Lord Curzon proposed advancing British influence through political officers to encourage self-government.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.
  • What event led to Transjordan becoming a "no man's land" in July 1920, and what was the British stance regarding its connection to Palestine at that time?: The Battle of Maysalun in July 1920 caused the Arab Kingdom of Syria to collapse, leaving Transjordan in a state of political uncertainty, described as a "no man's land." During this period, the British administration in Mandatory Palestine deliberately avoided establishing any definite connection between Transjordan and Palestine.

Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine allowed Britain to apply all provisions concerning the Jewish national home to Transjordan.

Answer: False

Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine granted Britain the authority to 'postpone or withhold' the application of provisions related to the Jewish national home in Transjordan, thereby enabling its separate administration.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine, and how did it specifically relate to Transjordan?: Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine was introduced by the British government in March 1921. It granted Britain the discretion to "postpone or withhold" the application of provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Transjordan, thereby creating a separate administrative area distinct from Palestine.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein agreed that Transjordan would be part of the Jewish national home established west of the Jordan River.

Answer: False

The agreement between Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein stipulated that Transjordan would be administered separately and would not form part of the Jewish national home designated for the territory west of the Jordan River.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the meeting between Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem regarding Transjordan's status?: Following the Cairo Conference, Winston Churchill met with Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem. They mutually agreed that Transjordan would be accepted into the Palestine mandatory area but as a separate Arab country, distinct from Palestine. Crucially, it was stipulated that Transjordan would not form part of the Jewish national home to be established west of the Jordan River.
  • What was the significance of the Cairo Conference in March 1921 concerning the administration of Transjordan?: The Cairo Conference, convened by Winston Churchill, was pivotal in shaping the future of Transjordan. It resulted in the decision to offer the throne of Transjordan to Abdullah bin Hussein, who would administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine, establishing an autonomous governing system. This conference effectively laid the political groundwork for the Emirate.

Revisionist Zionism aimed to establish a Jewish state encompassing only the territory west of the Jordan River.

Answer: False

Revisionist Zionism advocated for the establishment of a Jewish state that would encompass territories on both banks of the Jordan River, including Transjordan.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary goal of Revisionist Zionism concerning Transjordan, and how did the separation of Transjordan affect this goal?: Revisionist Zionism sought to establish a Jewish state encompassing both banks of the Jordan River. The British decision to administer Transjordan separately from Palestine and to exclude it from the Jewish national home provisions was seen by Revisionist Zionists as effectively severing Transjordan from Palestine, thereby reducing the territory available for a future Jewish state.
  • How did the establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan affect the goals of Revisionist Zionism?: The establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan as a separate entity, distinct from Palestine and not intended as part of the Jewish national home, directly impacted Revisionist Zionism's goal of a Jewish state spanning both sides of the Jordan River. This separation was seen as a significant reduction in the territory available for their aspirations.

The British government created a separate administration for Transjordan to reconcile wartime pledges to Arabs with the provisions for a Jewish national home.

Answer: True

The establishment of a distinct administration for Transjordan was a strategic decision by the British government to balance their commitments made during wartime to Arab leaders with the obligations outlined in the Mandate for Palestine concerning the establishment of a Jewish national home.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

The Palestine Order in Council, 1922, explicitly included Transjordan within its application, granting the High Commissioner full powers.

Answer: False

The Palestine Order in Council, 1922, explicitly excluded Transjordan from its direct application, although it granted the High Commissioner certain discretionary authorities within the territory.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the "Palestine Order in Council, 1922" concerning Transjordan?: The Palestine Order in Council, 1922, established the legal framework for the Mandatory Government in Palestine. Crucially, it explicitly excluded Transjordan from its application, although it granted the High Commissioner some discretionary powers within the territory.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

The British government included Transjordan within the Palestine Mandate primarily to assert their claim and avoid complications with other Allied Powers regarding its status.

Answer: True

By incorporating Transjordan within the broader framework of the Palestine Mandate, the British sought to solidify their administrative control and preempt potential territorial claims or disputes from other Allied powers concerning the region's future status.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the British government's justification for including Transjordan within the scope of the Palestine Mandate, despite its distinct Arab character?: The British government included Transjordan within the Palestine Mandate primarily to assert their claim over the territory and avoid potential complications with other Allied Powers regarding its legal status. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.
  • How did the British government handle the legal status of Transjordan in relation to the Mandate for Palestine?: To assert their claim and avoid international complications, the British government proceeded on the assumption that Transjordan formed part of the area covered by the Palestine Mandate. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.
  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.

The establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan as a separate entity did not affect the goals of Revisionist Zionism.

Answer: False

The creation of the Emirate of Transjordan as a distinct administrative unit, separate from Palestine and excluded from the Jewish national home provisions, significantly impacted Revisionist Zionism's objective of establishing a Jewish state encompassing both banks of the Jordan River.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan affect the goals of Revisionist Zionism?: The establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan as a separate entity, distinct from Palestine and not intended as part of the Jewish national home, directly impacted Revisionist Zionism's goal of a Jewish state spanning both sides of the Jordan River. This separation was seen as a significant reduction in the territory available for their aspirations.
  • What was the primary goal of Revisionist Zionism concerning Transjordan, and how did the separation of Transjordan affect this goal?: Revisionist Zionism sought to establish a Jewish state encompassing both banks of the Jordan River. The British decision to administer Transjordan separately from Palestine and to exclude it from the Jewish national home provisions was seen by Revisionist Zionists as effectively severing Transjordan from Palestine, thereby reducing the territory available for a future Jewish state.

A March 1921 British memorandum described Transjordan as an 'Arab province or adjunct of Palestine,' aiming to preserve its Arab character while differentiating it from the Jewish national home provisions.

Answer: True

A British memorandum from March 1921 conceptualized Transjordan as an 'Arab province or adjunct of Palestine.' This framing aimed to maintain its distinct Arab identity while managing it under the broader mandate structure, separate from the Jewish national home provisions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the stated purpose of the British government's policy regarding Transjordan's administration, as articulated in a March 1921 memorandum?: A British memorandum prior to the Cairo Conference stated that Transjordan should be treated as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine," while simultaneously preserving its Arab character and administration. This approach aimed to manage the territory while respecting British commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

The British government proceeded on the assumption that Transjordan formed part of the Palestine Mandate to avoid complications with other powers.

Answer: True

To assert their claim and preempt potential international disputes, the British government operated under the premise that Transjordan fell within the scope of the Palestine Mandate, facilitating its administration within that framework.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the British government handle the legal status of Transjordan in relation to the Mandate for Palestine?: To assert their claim and avoid international complications, the British government proceeded on the assumption that Transjordan formed part of the area covered by the Palestine Mandate. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.
  • What was the British government's justification for including Transjordan within the scope of the Palestine Mandate, despite its distinct Arab character?: The British government included Transjordan within the Palestine Mandate primarily to assert their claim over the territory and avoid potential complications with other Allied Powers regarding its legal status. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.
  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.

The concept of Transjordan as an 'Arab province or adjunct of Palestine' was used to justify its exclusion from the Jewish national home provisions.

Answer: True

The designation of Transjordan as an 'Arab province or adjunct of Palestine' served as a rationale for its separate administration and its exclusion from the clauses of the Mandate pertaining to the establishment of a Jewish national home.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the stated purpose of the British government's policy regarding Transjordan's administration, as articulated in a March 1921 memorandum?: A British memorandum prior to the Cairo Conference stated that Transjordan should be treated as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine," while simultaneously preserving its Arab character and administration. This approach aimed to manage the territory while respecting British commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

A League of Nations resolution in September 1922 declared all provisions of the Palestine Mandate applicable in Transjordan.

Answer: False

A League of Nations resolution in September 1922, based on British proposals, declared certain provisions of the Palestine Mandate inapplicable in Transjordan, allowing for its separate administration.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the status of Transjordan's relationship with the League of Nations regarding its mandate?: The mandate for Transjordan was technically part of the Mandate for Palestine. However, a League of Nations resolution in September 1922, based on a British proposal, declared certain provisions of the Palestine Mandate inapplicable in Transjordan, allowing for its separate administration under Emir Abdullah.
  • What was the significance of the "Palestine Order in Council, 1922" concerning Transjordan?: The Palestine Order in Council, 1922, established the legal framework for the Mandatory Government in Palestine. Crucially, it explicitly excluded Transjordan from its application, although it granted the High Commissioner some discretionary powers within the territory.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

What was the initial British approach to administering Transjordan after the Arab Kingdom of Syria collapsed in 1920?

Answer: Encouraging self-government through political officers, following rejection of direct administration.

Following the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria, the British initially proposed encouraging self-governance in Transjordan via political officers, after the High Commissioner for Palestine's request for direct administration was denied.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.
  • How did the British government handle the legal status of Transjordan in relation to the Mandate for Palestine?: To assert their claim and avoid international complications, the British government proceeded on the assumption that Transjordan formed part of the area covered by the Palestine Mandate. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.
  • What was the British government's initial approach to administering Transjordan after the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria in 1920?: Following the collapse of the Arab Kingdom of Syria at the Battle of Maysalun, Transjordan became a "no man's land." The British High Commissioner for Palestine, Herbert Samuel, initially had his request to extend the frontier of British territory beyond the Jordan River and bring Transjordan under his administration rejected. Instead, Lord Curzon proposed advancing British influence through political officers to encourage self-government.

Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine provided Britain with the authority to:

Answer: Postpone or withhold the application of Jewish national home provisions in Transjordan.

Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine empowered Britain with the discretion to delay or suspend the implementation of provisions concerning the Jewish national home within Transjordan, facilitating its separate administrative path.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine, and how did it specifically relate to Transjordan?: Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine was introduced by the British government in March 1921. It granted Britain the discretion to "postpone or withhold" the application of provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Transjordan, thereby creating a separate administrative area distinct from Palestine.

What was the outcome of the meeting between Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein regarding Transjordan's status?

Answer: Transjordan was accepted into the Palestine mandatory area as a separate Arab country, excluded from the Jewish national home.

The discussions between Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein concluded with an agreement to incorporate Transjordan into the Palestine mandate area but as a distinct Arab entity, explicitly excluding it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the meeting between Winston Churchill and Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem regarding Transjordan's status?: Following the Cairo Conference, Winston Churchill met with Abdullah bin Hussein in Jerusalem. They mutually agreed that Transjordan would be accepted into the Palestine mandatory area but as a separate Arab country, distinct from Palestine. Crucially, it was stipulated that Transjordan would not form part of the Jewish national home to be established west of the Jordan River.
  • What was the significance of the Cairo Conference in March 1921 concerning the administration of Transjordan?: The Cairo Conference, convened by Winston Churchill, was pivotal in shaping the future of Transjordan. It resulted in the decision to offer the throne of Transjordan to Abdullah bin Hussein, who would administer the territory under the British Mandate for Palestine, establishing an autonomous governing system. This conference effectively laid the political groundwork for the Emirate.
  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.

Revisionist Zionism's primary goal concerning the territory included:

Answer: Establishing a Jewish state encompassing both banks of the Jordan River.

Revisionist Zionism fundamentally aimed to establish a Jewish state that would extend across both banks of the Jordan River, encompassing territories that later became Transjordan and Palestine.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary goal of Revisionist Zionism concerning Transjordan, and how did the separation of Transjordan affect this goal?: Revisionist Zionism sought to establish a Jewish state encompassing both banks of the Jordan River. The British decision to administer Transjordan separately from Palestine and to exclude it from the Jewish national home provisions was seen by Revisionist Zionists as effectively severing Transjordan from Palestine, thereby reducing the territory available for a future Jewish state.

What was the primary reason cited by the British government for creating a separate administration for Transjordan?

Answer: To reconcile wartime pledges to Arabs with the Jewish national home provisions.

The British government established a separate administration for Transjordan primarily to reconcile their wartime commitments to Arab independence with the stipulations of the Mandate for Palestine concerning the Jewish national home.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.
  • What was the British government's justification for including Transjordan within the scope of the Palestine Mandate, despite its distinct Arab character?: The British government included Transjordan within the Palestine Mandate primarily to assert their claim over the territory and avoid potential complications with other Allied Powers regarding its legal status. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.
  • How did the British government handle the legal status of Transjordan in relation to the Mandate for Palestine?: To assert their claim and avoid international complications, the British government proceeded on the assumption that Transjordan formed part of the area covered by the Palestine Mandate. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.

What did a League of Nations resolution in September 1922 decide regarding the application of the Palestine Mandate in Transjordan?

Answer: It declared certain provisions inapplicable, allowing for separate administration.

A League of Nations resolution in September 1922, based on British proposals, determined that specific provisions of the Palestine Mandate would not apply to Transjordan, thereby enabling its distinct administrative framework.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the status of Transjordan's relationship with the League of Nations regarding its mandate?: The mandate for Transjordan was technically part of the Mandate for Palestine. However, a League of Nations resolution in September 1922, based on a British proposal, declared certain provisions of the Palestine Mandate inapplicable in Transjordan, allowing for its separate administration under Emir Abdullah.
  • What was the significance of the "Palestine Order in Council, 1922" concerning Transjordan?: The Palestine Order in Council, 1922, established the legal framework for the Mandatory Government in Palestine. Crucially, it explicitly excluded Transjordan from its application, although it granted the High Commissioner some discretionary powers within the territory.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

Which of the following was NOT a significant factor in the formation or administration of the Emirate of Transjordan?

Answer: The establishment of the State of Israel in 1948.

While the Hashemite dynasty's involvement, the Mandate for Palestine, and the Sykes-Picot Agreement were crucial factors in the formation and administration of the Emirate of Transjordan, the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 occurred after the period of the Emirate's establishment and mandate administration.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.
  • How was Transjordan administered under the Ottoman Empire prior to World War I?: Under the Ottoman Empire, most of Transjordan was part of the Syria Vilayet, primarily falling under the sanjaks of Hauran and Ma'an. There was no single Ottoman district named Transjordan; instead, the area was divided into districts such as Ajlun, al-Balqa, al-Karak, and Ma'an. The Tanzimat reforms had begun laying the groundwork for state formation during the latter half of the 19th century.
  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.

What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?

Answer: It allowed Britain to manage Transjordan under the Palestine Mandate while differentiating it from Jewish national home provisions.

The concept of Transjordan as an 'Arab province or adjunct of Palestine' provided a framework for its administration within the broader Palestine Mandate, while simultaneously allowing for its distinct governance and exclusion from the Jewish national home provisions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the significance of the "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" concept for Transjordan's administration?: The concept of Transjordan as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine" allowed the British to include it within the Palestine Mandate's administrative umbrella. This strategy enabled them to manage the territory while respecting their commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.
  • What was the stated purpose of the British government's policy regarding Transjordan's administration, as articulated in a March 1921 memorandum?: A British memorandum prior to the Cairo Conference stated that Transjordan should be treated as an "Arab province or adjunct of Palestine," while simultaneously preserving its Arab character and administration. This approach aimed to manage the territory while respecting British commitments to Arab independence and differentiating it from the provisions concerning the Jewish national home in Palestine proper.

Key International Agreements and Diplomacy

The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence promised Arab independence, while the Sykes-Picot Agreement secretly allocated Transjordan to French control.

Answer: False

While the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence did promise Arab independence, the Sykes-Picot Agreement secretly allocated spheres of influence that placed Transjordan under British, not French, control.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence of 1915-1916 define the boundaries of promised Arab independence?: In the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, particularly in McMahon's letter of October 24, 1915, the British government agreed to recognize Arab independence in exchange for the Arab Revolt. The area of independence was defined as the territories proposed by the Sharif of Mecca, with the exclusion of "portions of Syria" lying west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo.
  • What were the key British agreements that influenced the territorial arrangements in the Middle East after World War I, particularly concerning Transjordan?: Two significant British agreements were the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence and the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence involved British promises of Arab independence, while the Sykes-Picot Agreement secretly delineated spheres of influence between Britain and France, which allocated the Transjordan region to British control.
  • What was the purpose and outcome of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement negotiated between Britain and France?: The Sykes-Picot Agreement, negotiated between November 1915 and January 1916, was a secret treaty defining British and French spheres of influence in the eventual partition of the Ottoman Empire. It allocated to Britain control over areas including modern-day southern Israel and Palestine, Jordan, and southern Iraq, while France was to have influence in Syria and Lebanon.

The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence excluded territories west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo from the promised Arab independence.

Answer: True

The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, particularly in correspondence from October 1915, specified that the promised Arab independence would exclude territories lying west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence of 1915-1916 define the boundaries of promised Arab independence?: In the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, particularly in McMahon's letter of October 24, 1915, the British government agreed to recognize Arab independence in exchange for the Arab Revolt. The area of independence was defined as the territories proposed by the Sharif of Mecca, with the exclusion of "portions of Syria" lying west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo.

The Sykes-Picot Agreement, negotiated between 1915 and 1916, allocated influence over Syria and Lebanon to France, and southern Iraq, Jordan, and Palestine to Britain.

Answer: True

The Sykes-Picot Agreement delineated spheres of influence, assigning Syria and Lebanon to French influence and southern Iraq, Jordan, and Palestine to British influence.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose and outcome of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement negotiated between Britain and France?: The Sykes-Picot Agreement, negotiated between November 1915 and January 1916, was a secret treaty defining British and French spheres of influence in the eventual partition of the Ottoman Empire. It allocated to Britain control over areas including modern-day southern Israel and Palestine, Jordan, and southern Iraq, while France was to have influence in Syria and Lebanon.
  • What were the key British agreements that influenced the territorial arrangements in the Middle East after World War I, particularly concerning Transjordan?: Two significant British agreements were the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence and the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence involved British promises of Arab independence, while the Sykes-Picot Agreement secretly delineated spheres of influence between Britain and France, which allocated the Transjordan region to British control.

Which secret agreement delineated British and French spheres of influence in the partition of the Ottoman Empire after WWI, allocating Transjordan to Britain?

Answer: The Sykes-Picot Agreement

The Sykes-Picot Agreement, a secret treaty negotiated between Britain and France, defined their respective spheres of influence in the post-Ottoman Middle East, allocating Transjordan to British control.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose and outcome of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement negotiated between Britain and France?: The Sykes-Picot Agreement, negotiated between November 1915 and January 1916, was a secret treaty defining British and French spheres of influence in the eventual partition of the Ottoman Empire. It allocated to Britain control over areas including modern-day southern Israel and Palestine, Jordan, and southern Iraq, while France was to have influence in Syria and Lebanon.
  • What were the key British agreements that influenced the territorial arrangements in the Middle East after World War I, particularly concerning Transjordan?: Two significant British agreements were the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence and the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence involved British promises of Arab independence, while the Sykes-Picot Agreement secretly delineated spheres of influence between Britain and France, which allocated the Transjordan region to British control.

According to the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, which areas were excluded from the promised Arab independence?

Answer: Portions of Syria lying west of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo

The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence specified that the promised Arab independence would exclude territories situated west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence of 1915-1916 define the boundaries of promised Arab independence?: In the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, particularly in McMahon's letter of October 24, 1915, the British government agreed to recognize Arab independence in exchange for the Arab Revolt. The area of independence was defined as the territories proposed by the Sharif of Mecca, with the exclusion of "portions of Syria" lying west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo.

Internal Governance and Security

The primary threats to Abdullah's early rule in Transjordan came from incursions by Wahhabi tribesmen from Najd.

Answer: True

During the initial years of the Emirate, Abdullah bin Hussein faced significant challenges from repeated incursions by Wahhabi tribesmen, known as the Ikhwan, originating from Najd.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the main threats to Abdullah's rule in Transjordan during the early years of the Emirate?: The most significant threats to Abdullah's rule were repeated incursions by Wahhabi tribesmen, known as the Ikhwan, from Najd (modern Saudi Arabia) into southern Transjordan. These raids posed a serious challenge that Abdullah could not repel alone and required British military assistance.
  • How did the British military presence contribute to the defense and stability of the Emirate of Transjordan?: The British maintained an air force base near Amman, and their military force served as the primary defense against Ikhwan raids between 1922 and 1924. Additionally, British military support was utilized to help Abdullah suppress local rebellions, such as the Kura rebellion and the Adwan Rebellion, thereby aiding in the consolidation of his authority.

The British military presence in Transjordan, including an air force base near Amman, was primarily used to suppress local rebellions.

Answer: False

The British military presence served multiple roles, including defense against external threats like Ikhwan raids and assistance in suppressing local rebellions. It was not solely focused on suppressing internal dissent.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the British military presence contribute to the defense and stability of the Emirate of Transjordan?: The British maintained an air force base near Amman, and their military force served as the primary defense against Ikhwan raids between 1922 and 1924. Additionally, British military support was utilized to help Abdullah suppress local rebellions, such as the Kura rebellion and the Adwan Rebellion, thereby aiding in the consolidation of his authority.
  • What were the main threats to Abdullah's rule in Transjordan during the early years of the Emirate?: The most significant threats to Abdullah's rule were repeated incursions by Wahhabi tribesmen, known as the Ikhwan, from Najd (modern Saudi Arabia) into southern Transjordan. These raids posed a serious challenge that Abdullah could not repel alone and required British military assistance.

The Arab Legion was initially known as Peake's Reserve Force and was instrumental in maintaining order and defense within Transjordan.

Answer: True

The Arab Legion originated from Peake's Reserve Force, established under British command. This force played a critical role in upholding internal security and providing defense for the Emirate of Transjordan.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the role of the "Arab Legion" in the defense and administration of Transjordan?: The Arab Legion, which evolved from Peake's Reserve Force, played a crucial role in maintaining law and order within Transjordan. It provided the necessary military strength to suppress internal rebellions and defend against external threats like the Ikhwan raids, thereby supporting Emir Abdullah's government.

What were the main external threats faced by Abdullah's rule in Transjordan during its early years?

Answer: Incursions by Wahhabi tribesmen (Ikhwan) from Najd.

The most significant external threats confronting Abdullah's nascent rule in Transjordan emanated from recurrent incursions by Wahhabi tribesmen, commonly referred to as the Ikhwan, originating from the Najd region.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the main threats to Abdullah's rule in Transjordan during the early years of the Emirate?: The most significant threats to Abdullah's rule were repeated incursions by Wahhabi tribesmen, known as the Ikhwan, from Najd (modern Saudi Arabia) into southern Transjordan. These raids posed a serious challenge that Abdullah could not repel alone and required British military assistance.
  • How did the British military presence contribute to the defense and stability of the Emirate of Transjordan?: The British maintained an air force base near Amman, and their military force served as the primary defense against Ikhwan raids between 1922 and 1924. Additionally, British military support was utilized to help Abdullah suppress local rebellions, such as the Kura rebellion and the Adwan Rebellion, thereby aiding in the consolidation of his authority.
  • What was the initial duration specified for Emir Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan?: Upon his appointment as Emir in April 1921, Abdullah's nominal rule over Transjordan was initially set for a period of six months. However, this arrangement extended throughout his lifetime, solidifying Hashemite rule in the territory.

How did the British military presence contribute to stability in Transjordan?

Answer: By providing defense against Ikhwan raids and assisting in suppressing rebellions.

The British military contingent played a crucial role in stabilizing Transjordan by defending against incursions from the Ikhwan and providing support for the suppression of internal rebellions, thereby bolstering the authority of Emir Abdullah's government.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the role of the "Arab Legion" in the defense and administration of Transjordan?: The Arab Legion, which evolved from Peake's Reserve Force, played a crucial role in maintaining law and order within Transjordan. It provided the necessary military strength to suppress internal rebellions and defend against external threats like the Ikhwan raids, thereby supporting Emir Abdullah's government.
  • What was the British government's justification for including Transjordan within the scope of the Palestine Mandate, despite its distinct Arab character?: The British government included Transjordan within the Palestine Mandate primarily to assert their claim over the territory and avoid potential complications with other Allied Powers regarding its legal status. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.
  • How did the British government handle the legal status of Transjordan in relation to the Mandate for Palestine?: To assert their claim and avoid international complications, the British government proceeded on the assumption that Transjordan formed part of the area covered by the Palestine Mandate. This allowed them to administer it under the mandate's framework while implementing separate arrangements to accommodate Arab independence promises.

Territorial Definition and Borders

The Arabic designation إمارة شرق الأردن (Imārat Sharq al-Urdun) signifies "the emirate west of the Jordan River."

Answer: False

The Arabic name إمارة شرق الأردن literally translates to "the emirate east of the Jordan," accurately reflecting its geographical location.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the literal translation of the Arabic name for the Emirate of Transjordan, إمارة شرق الأردن?: The Arabic name, إمارة شرق الأردن (Imārat Sharq al-Urdun), translates literally to "the emirate east of the Jordan." This name clearly indicates its geographical location relative to the Jordan River.
  • What was the name of the state established on May 25, 1946, and what significant political change occurred in its official name in 1949?: On May 25, 1946, the Emirate became the "Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan," with its ruler, Abdullah, taking the title of King. In 1949, after annexing the West Bank, the country's official name was changed to the "Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan," commonly known as Jordan.

Control over the Ma'an-Aqaba region was strategically important for Transjordan to prevent it from becoming landlocked and provide access to the Port of Aqaba.

Answer: True

Securing the Ma'an-Aqaba region was vital for Transjordan's strategic interests, primarily by ensuring access to the sea via the Port of Aqaba and preventing the territory from being landlocked.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the strategic importance of the southern border of Transjordan, particularly concerning the port of Aqaba?: The southern border of Transjordan was strategically important to prevent the territory from becoming landlocked. Control over the Ma'an-Aqaba region provided access to the sea via the Port of Aqaba, which was crucial for trade and strategic positioning.
  • How did Abdullah bin Hussein assert control over Transjordan in late 1920 and early 1921?: Abdullah bin Hussein arrived in Ma'an in November 1920 with an army of 300 men. Without facing significant opposition, he and his forces effectively occupied most of Transjordan by March 1921, establishing his authority in the region.

The Uqair Protocol of December 2, 1922, defined the border between Transjordan and Saudi Arabia (Nejd).

Answer: False

The Uqair Protocol of December 2, 1922, primarily defined the border between Iraq and Nejd (Saudi Arabia), not directly between Transjordan and Nejd, although it influenced regional boundaries.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the border between Transjordan and Iraq initially defined, and what was its strategic significance?: The eastern border between Transjordan and Iraq was first set out in the Uqair Protocol of December 2, 1922, between Iraq and Nejd. Its strategic significance lay in its relation to the proposed construction of the Kirkuk-Haifa oil pipeline.
  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

In 1921, France transferred the District of Ramtha from Iraq to Transjordan.

Answer: False

In 1921, France transferred the District of Ramtha from Syria, not Iraq, to Transjordan as part of the evolving border definitions for the new entity.

Related Concepts:

  • What territorial adjustments were made concerning Transjordan's borders, such as the addition of the District of Ramtha?: In 1921, France transferred the District of Ramtha from Syria to Transjordan. This was one of several border adjustments that helped define the territory of the Emirate during its formative years.
  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

What was the strategic significance of controlling the Ma'an-Aqaba region for Transjordan?

Answer: It offered access to the sea via the Port of Aqaba and prevented the territory from being landlocked.

Control over the Ma'an-Aqaba region was strategically crucial for Transjordan, as it granted vital access to the Red Sea through the Port of Aqaba, thereby preventing the territory from becoming landlocked.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the strategic importance of the southern border of Transjordan, particularly concerning the port of Aqaba?: The southern border of Transjordan was strategically important to prevent the territory from becoming landlocked. Control over the Ma'an-Aqaba region provided access to the sea via the Port of Aqaba, which was crucial for trade and strategic positioning.
  • How did Abdullah bin Hussein assert control over Transjordan in late 1920 and early 1921?: Abdullah bin Hussein arrived in Ma'an in November 1920 with an army of 300 men. Without facing significant opposition, he and his forces effectively occupied most of Transjordan by March 1921, establishing his authority in the region.

The Uqair Protocol of December 2, 1922, primarily defined the border between which two entities?

Answer: Iraq and Saudi Arabia (Nejd)

The Uqair Protocol, signed on December 2, 1922, principally established the border demarcation between Iraq and Nejd (the precursor to modern Saudi Arabia).

Related Concepts:

  • How was the border between Transjordan and Iraq initially defined, and what was its strategic significance?: The eastern border between Transjordan and Iraq was first set out in the Uqair Protocol of December 2, 1922, between Iraq and Nejd. Its strategic significance lay in its relation to the proposed construction of the Kirkuk-Haifa oil pipeline.

In 1921, France transferred which district to Transjordan?

Answer: The District of Ramtha

As part of the border adjustments defining the Emirate, France transferred the District of Ramtha from Syria to Transjordan in 1921.

Related Concepts:

  • What territorial adjustments were made concerning Transjordan's borders, such as the addition of the District of Ramtha?: In 1921, France transferred the District of Ramtha from Syria to Transjordan. This was one of several border adjustments that helped define the territory of the Emirate during its formative years.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.
  • What was the official designation and period of existence for the British protectorate established east of the Jordan River?: The entity was officially designated the Emirate of Transjordan and existed as a British protectorate from 1921 to 1946. This period marks its establishment as a distinct political entity under British administration, serving as a precursor to the modern Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

Transition to Independence and Kingdomhood (1920s-1946)

Transjordan achieved full independence from British control on June 17, 1946, following the signing of the Sykes-Picot Agreement.

Answer: False

Transjordan achieved full independence on June 17, 1946, through the ratification of the Treaty of London, not the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The Sykes-Picot Agreement predated this period and concerned the division of Ottoman territories.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Emirate of Transjordan officially achieve full independence from British control?: The Emirate of Transjordan achieved full independence on June 17, 1946, following the ratification of the Treaty of London, which was signed on March 22, 1946. This treaty formalized the end of the British mandate and recognized Transjordan as a sovereign state.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.

On May 25, 1946, the Emirate became the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan, and its name was changed to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in 1949 after annexing the West Bank.

Answer: True

The Emirate was proclaimed the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan on May 25, 1946. The subsequent renaming to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in 1949 followed the annexation of the West Bank, unifying both sides of the river under a single designation.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the name of the state established on May 25, 1946, and what significant political change occurred in its official name in 1949?: On May 25, 1946, the Emirate became the "Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan," with its ruler, Abdullah, taking the title of King. In 1949, after annexing the West Bank, the country's official name was changed to the "Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan," commonly known as Jordan.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • What was the significance of the 1949 renaming of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan?: The renaming in 1949 to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan signified a major territorial and political consolidation. It occurred after Jordan annexed the West Bank, uniting both banks of the Jordan River under a single national identity and name.

On May 25, 1923, Britain recognized Transjordan as an independent government, provided it adopted a constitutional framework and allowed Britain to fulfill international obligations.

Answer: True

Britain issued a statement on May 25, 1923, recognizing Transjordan as an independent government under Emir Abdullah, contingent upon the establishment of a constitutional framework and Britain's ability to meet its international commitments.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the British government formally recognize the independence of Transjordan in 1923?: On May 25, 1923, the British government issued a statement recognizing Transjordan as an independent government under the rule of Emir Abdullah. This recognition was contingent upon the government being constitutional and allowing Britain to fulfill its international obligations through a formal agreement with Abdullah.
  • What was the significance of the 1928 treaty between the United Kingdom and the Emirate of Transjordan?: The 1928 treaty recognized the existence of an independent government in Transjordan and defined and limited its powers. While it marked a step towards self-governance, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the stated reason for the British government's decision to create a separate administration for Transjordan, distinct from Palestine?: The British government decided to create a separate administration for Transjordan primarily due to their wartime pledges to the Arabs, which promised recognition and support for Arab independence in the region east of the Jordan River. This was done to reconcile these pledges with the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, which included provisions for a Jewish national home.

The 1928 treaty with the UK transferred most administrative functions to Transjordan but maintained British oversight in key policy areas.

Answer: True

The 1928 treaty marked a gradual transfer of administrative responsibilities to Transjordan. However, Britain retained significant oversight concerning financial, military, and foreign policy matters, indicating that full autonomy had not yet been achieved.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the status of Transjordan's administration following the 1928 treaty with the United Kingdom?: The 1928 treaty marked a gradual transfer of most administrative functions, including the creation of a High Commissioner for Transjordan. While the treaty recognized an independent government and defined its powers, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the significance of the 1928 treaty between the United Kingdom and the Emirate of Transjordan?: The 1928 treaty recognized the existence of an independent government in Transjordan and defined and limited its powers. While it marked a step towards self-governance, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, formalized the end of the British mandate and recognized Transjordan as a sovereign state.

Answer: True

The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was pivotal in formally concluding the British mandate over Transjordan and acknowledging its status as an independent and sovereign nation.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.
  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.
  • How did the Emirate of Transjordan officially achieve full independence from British control?: The Emirate of Transjordan achieved full independence on June 17, 1946, following the ratification of the Treaty of London, which was signed on March 22, 1946. This treaty formalized the end of the British mandate and recognized Transjordan as a sovereign state.

The renaming of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in 1949 followed the annexation of the Golan Heights.

Answer: False

The name change to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in 1949 occurred subsequent to the annexation of the West Bank, not the Golan Heights. This unification consolidated control over both banks of the Jordan River.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 1949 renaming of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan?: The renaming in 1949 to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan signified a major territorial and political consolidation. It occurred after Jordan annexed the West Bank, uniting both banks of the Jordan River under a single national identity and name.
  • What was the name of the state established on May 25, 1946, and what significant political change occurred in its official name in 1949?: On May 25, 1946, the Emirate became the "Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan," with its ruler, Abdullah, taking the title of King. In 1949, after annexing the West Bank, the country's official name was changed to the "Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan," commonly known as Jordan.

The 1928 treaty between the UK and Transjordan fully transferred all administrative powers, ending British oversight.

Answer: False

The 1928 treaty marked a step towards self-governance by transferring many administrative functions, but it did not terminate British oversight. Britain retained significant control over key policy areas, including finance, military affairs, and foreign relations.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 1928 treaty between the United Kingdom and the Emirate of Transjordan?: The 1928 treaty recognized the existence of an independent government in Transjordan and defined and limited its powers. While it marked a step towards self-governance, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the status of Transjordan's administration following the 1928 treaty with the United Kingdom?: The 1928 treaty marked a gradual transfer of most administrative functions, including the creation of a High Commissioner for Transjordan. While the treaty recognized an independent government and defined its powers, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.

In 1946, the Soviet Union vetoed Transjordan's application for United Nations membership, asserting that the territory remained under French control.

Answer: False

The Soviet Union's veto of Transjordan's UN membership application in 1946 was based on the argument that the nation was not fully independent of British control, not French control.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the stated reason for the Soviet Union's veto of Transjordan's application for United Nations membership in 1946?: The Soviet Union vetoed Transjordan's application for UN membership in 1946, citing that the nation was not "fully independent" of British control. This objection reflected ongoing geopolitical tensions and differing views on the extent of British influence in the region.

The Anglo-American treaty required the US to recognize Transjordan's termination of mandate status only upon its admission to the United Nations.

Answer: True

The Anglo-American treaty stipulated that the United States would recognize the termination of the mandate for Transjordan only after the country was admitted to the United Nations as a fully independent state.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Anglo-American treaty, also known as the Palestine Mandate Convention, regarding Transjordan's independence?: The Anglo-American treaty, or Palestine Mandate Convention, allowed the United States to delay any unilateral British action to terminate the mandate for Transjordan. This meant that the US policy was to recognize Transjordan's termination of mandate status only upon its admission to the United Nations as a fully independent country.
  • How did the Emirate of Transjordan officially achieve full independence from British control?: The Emirate of Transjordan achieved full independence on June 17, 1946, following the ratification of the Treaty of London, which was signed on March 22, 1946. This treaty formalized the end of the British mandate and recognized Transjordan as a sovereign state.
  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.

How did the Emirate of Transjordan officially achieve full independence from British control?

Answer: By ratifying the Treaty of London in March 1946.

The Emirate of Transjordan officially achieved full independence from British control upon the ratification of the Treaty of London in March 1946, which formally ended the mandate.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Emirate of Transjordan officially achieve full independence from British control?: The Emirate of Transjordan achieved full independence on June 17, 1946, following the ratification of the Treaty of London, which was signed on March 22, 1946. This treaty formalized the end of the British mandate and recognized Transjordan as a sovereign state.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.
  • How did the British government formally recognize the independence of Transjordan in 1923?: On May 25, 1923, the British government issued a statement recognizing Transjordan as an independent government under the rule of Emir Abdullah. This recognition was contingent upon the government being constitutional and allowing Britain to fulfill its international obligations through a formal agreement with Abdullah.

What was the status of Transjordan's administration following the 1928 treaty with the United Kingdom?

Answer: Most administrative functions were transferred, but Britain retained significant oversight in key areas.

The 1928 treaty represented a gradual devolution of administrative powers to Transjordan, yet the United Kingdom maintained substantial oversight in critical domains such as finance, defense, and foreign policy.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the status of Transjordan's administration following the 1928 treaty with the United Kingdom?: The 1928 treaty marked a gradual transfer of most administrative functions, including the creation of a High Commissioner for Transjordan. While the treaty recognized an independent government and defined its powers, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the significance of the 1928 treaty between the United Kingdom and the Emirate of Transjordan?: The 1928 treaty recognized the existence of an independent government in Transjordan and defined and limited its powers. While it marked a step towards self-governance, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the administrative status of the Transjordan region immediately following the Ottoman defeat in World War I?: After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, the Transjordan region was initially administered within OETA East (Occupied Enemy Territory Administration East). Following the British withdrawal in 1919, it gained de facto recognition as part of the Hashemite-ruled Arab Kingdom of Syria.

What was the significance of the 1949 renaming of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan?

Answer: It signified the annexation of the West Bank and unification of both banks of the river.

The renaming in 1949 to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan marked a significant political consolidation, occurring after the annexation of the West Bank and unifying both banks of the Jordan River under a single national identity.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 1949 renaming of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan?: The renaming in 1949 to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan signified a major territorial and political consolidation. It occurred after Jordan annexed the West Bank, uniting both banks of the Jordan River under a single national identity and name.
  • What was the name of the state established on May 25, 1946, and what significant political change occurred in its official name in 1949?: On May 25, 1946, the Emirate became the "Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan," with its ruler, Abdullah, taking the title of King. In 1949, after annexing the West Bank, the country's official name was changed to the "Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan," commonly known as Jordan.
  • When was the Emirate of Transjordan officially established, and what significant political transformation did it undergo in 1946?: The Emirate of Transjordan was officially established on April 11, 1921. In 1946, it transitioned from a British protectorate to a fully independent state, becoming the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. This marked the end of the British mandate and the beginning of its sovereignty.

Why did the Soviet Union veto Transjordan's application for United Nations membership in 1946?

Answer: Because Transjordan was not considered fully independent of British control.

The Soviet Union's veto of Transjordan's UN membership application in 1946 was predicated on the assertion that the nation had not yet achieved full independence from British influence.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the stated reason for the Soviet Union's veto of Transjordan's application for United Nations membership in 1946?: The Soviet Union vetoed Transjordan's application for UN membership in 1946, citing that the nation was not "fully independent" of British control. This objection reflected ongoing geopolitical tensions and differing views on the extent of British influence in the region.

The Anglo-American treaty concerning the Palestine Mandate stipulated that the US would recognize Transjordan's termination of mandate status upon:

Answer: Its admission to the United Nations as a fully independent country.

The Anglo-American treaty stipulated that the United States would recognize the termination of the mandate for Transjordan only after the country had been admitted to the United Nations as a fully independent member state.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Anglo-American treaty, also known as the Palestine Mandate Convention, regarding Transjordan's independence?: The Anglo-American treaty, or Palestine Mandate Convention, allowed the United States to delay any unilateral British action to terminate the mandate for Transjordan. This meant that the US policy was to recognize Transjordan's termination of mandate status only upon its admission to the United Nations as a fully independent country.
  • How did the Emirate of Transjordan officially achieve full independence from British control?: The Emirate of Transjordan achieved full independence on June 17, 1946, following the ratification of the Treaty of London, which was signed on March 22, 1946. This treaty formalized the end of the British mandate and recognized Transjordan as a sovereign state.
  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.

The 1928 treaty between the United Kingdom and the Emirate of Transjordan:

Answer: Defined and limited the powers of the Transjordanian government but maintained British oversight.

The 1928 treaty formalized the powers of the Transjordanian government while simultaneously establishing limitations and ensuring continued British oversight in crucial areas, thus not granting full sovereignty.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 1928 treaty between the United Kingdom and the Emirate of Transjordan?: The 1928 treaty recognized the existence of an independent government in Transjordan and defined and limited its powers. While it marked a step towards self-governance, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the status of Transjordan's administration following the 1928 treaty with the United Kingdom?: The 1928 treaty marked a gradual transfer of most administrative functions, including the creation of a High Commissioner for Transjordan. While the treaty recognized an independent government and defined its powers, it did not alter the mandate's status, and Britain retained significant oversight in financial, military, and foreign policy matters, leading to disaffection among some Transjordanians.
  • What was the significance of the 1946 Treaty of London concerning the status of Transjordan?: The Treaty of London, signed in March 1946, was crucial for the formal recognition of Transjordan's full independence. It stipulated the terms for the end of the British mandate and the establishment of the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan upon ratification by both countries' parliaments.

Socio-Demographic Aspects

British figures estimated the population of Transjordan to be around 200,000 in 1924, with Christians making up the majority.

Answer: False

British estimates in 1924 placed the population at approximately 200,000. However, the majority of this population was Muslim Arab, with Christians constituting a minority (estimated around 15,000).

Related Concepts:

  • What was the population of Transjordan estimated to be in 1924, according to British figures?: In 1924, British estimates suggested the population of Transjordan was around 200,000 people. This figure included approximately 10,000 Circassians and Chechens, about 15,000 Christians, with the majority being Muslim Arabs.
  • What was the British estimate of the Christian population in Transjordan in 1924?: According to British estimates in 1924, there were approximately 15,000 Christians residing in Transjordan. The majority of the population was estimated to be Muslim Arabs.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).

The British estimated the population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be approximately 230,000, with the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region being the most populous.

Answer: False

While the British estimated the total population at approximately 230,000 in March 1921, the Ajlun region, not the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region, was the most populous administrative area.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).
  • What was the estimated population of the Balqa region, including Amman and Salt, in March 1921?: The Balqa region, which included the cities of Amman and Salt, along with Madaba, was estimated to have a population of 80,000 in March 1921, according to British figures. This region was the second most populous administrative area within the Emirate.
  • What was the estimated population of the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region in March 1921?: The southernmost region, encompassing Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk (which is now in Saudi Arabia), was estimated to have a population of 10,000 in March 1921. This region had the smallest estimated population among the administrative areas of Transjordan at that time.

By the early 1940s, the population of Transjordan was estimated to be between 300,000 and 350,000 people.

Answer: True

Demographic estimates for Transjordan in the early 1940s indicate a population range of approximately 300,000 to 350,000 individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the population estimate for Transjordan in the early 1940s?: By the early 1940s, the population of Transjordan was estimated to have grown to between 300,000 and 350,000 people. This growth occurred during the period of the British Mandate, prior to the Emirate's transition to a kingdom.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).
  • What was the population of Transjordan estimated to be in 1924, according to British figures?: In 1924, British estimates suggested the population of Transjordan was around 200,000 people. This figure included approximately 10,000 Circassians and Chechens, about 15,000 Christians, with the majority being Muslim Arabs.

According to British estimates in 1924, approximately 15,000 Christians resided in Transjordan.

Answer: True

British demographic estimates from 1924 indicated that the Christian population within Transjordan numbered approximately 15,000 individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the British estimate of the Christian population in Transjordan in 1924?: According to British estimates in 1924, there were approximately 15,000 Christians residing in Transjordan. The majority of the population was estimated to be Muslim Arabs.
  • What was the population of Transjordan estimated to be in 1924, according to British figures?: In 1924, British estimates suggested the population of Transjordan was around 200,000 people. This figure included approximately 10,000 Circassians and Chechens, about 15,000 Christians, with the majority being Muslim Arabs.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).

The Ajlun region, including Irbid and Jerash, was estimated by the British in March 1921 to have a population of 80,000.

Answer: False

British estimates from March 1921 placed the population of the Ajlun region, encompassing Irbid and Jerash, at approximately 100,000, making it the most populous administrative area within Transjordan at that time.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the estimated population of the Balqa region, including Amman and Salt, in March 1921?: The Balqa region, which included the cities of Amman and Salt, along with Madaba, was estimated to have a population of 80,000 in March 1921, according to British figures. This region was the second most populous administrative area within the Emirate.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).
  • What was the estimated population of the Ajlun region, including Irbid and Jerash, in March 1921?: According to the March 1921 British estimate, the Ajlun region, which encompassed Irbid, Jerash, the Bani Hasan country, and the Mafraq bedouins, had an estimated population of 100,000. This made it the most populous administrative region within Transjordan at that time.

The Balqa region, including Amman and Salt, had an estimated population of 80,000 in March 1921.

Answer: True

According to British estimates in March 1921, the Balqa region, which included Amman and Salt, was estimated to have a population of 80,000 inhabitants.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the estimated population of the Ajlun region, including Irbid and Jerash, in March 1921?: According to the March 1921 British estimate, the Ajlun region, which encompassed Irbid, Jerash, the Bani Hasan country, and the Mafraq bedouins, had an estimated population of 100,000. This made it the most populous administrative region within Transjordan at that time.
  • What was the estimated population of the Balqa region, including Amman and Salt, in March 1921?: The Balqa region, which included the cities of Amman and Salt, along with Madaba, was estimated to have a population of 80,000 in March 1921, according to British figures. This region was the second most populous administrative area within the Emirate.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).

The Karak region, including Tafilah, was estimated by the British in March 1921 to have a population of 40,000.

Answer: True

British estimates conducted in March 1921 indicated that the Karak region, which also encompassed Tafilah, had an estimated population of 40,000.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the estimated population of the Karak region, including Tafilah, in March 1921?: In March 1921, the Karak region, which also included Tafilah, was estimated by the British to have a population of 40,000. This made it the third most populous administrative region within the Emirate.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).
  • What was the estimated population of the Balqa region, including Amman and Salt, in March 1921?: The Balqa region, which included the cities of Amman and Salt, along with Madaba, was estimated to have a population of 80,000 in March 1921, according to British figures. This region was the second most populous administrative area within the Emirate.

In March 1921, the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region was estimated to possess the largest population within Transjordan.

Answer: False

British estimates from March 1921 indicated that the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region had the smallest estimated population (10,000) among the administrative areas of Transjordan at that time.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the estimated population of the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region in March 1921?: The southernmost region, encompassing Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk (which is now in Saudi Arabia), was estimated to have a population of 10,000 in March 1921. This region had the smallest estimated population among the administrative areas of Transjordan at that time.
  • What was the estimated population of the Ajlun region, including Irbid and Jerash, in March 1921?: According to the March 1921 British estimate, the Ajlun region, which encompassed Irbid, Jerash, the Bani Hasan country, and the Mafraq bedouins, had an estimated population of 100,000. This made it the most populous administrative region within Transjordan at that time.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).

According to British estimates in 1924, what was the approximate population of Transjordan?

Answer: Around 200,000

British demographic assessments conducted in 1924 estimated the total population of Transjordan to be approximately 200,000 individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the population of Transjordan estimated to be in 1924, according to British figures?: In 1924, British estimates suggested the population of Transjordan was around 200,000 people. This figure included approximately 10,000 Circassians and Chechens, about 15,000 Christians, with the majority being Muslim Arabs.
  • What was the British estimate of the Christian population in Transjordan in 1924?: According to British estimates in 1924, there were approximately 15,000 Christians residing in Transjordan. The majority of the population was estimated to be Muslim Arabs.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).

What was the estimated population of the Ajlun region, including Irbid and Jerash, according to British estimates in March 1921?

Answer: 100,000

British demographic estimates from March 1921 indicated that the Ajlun region, encompassing areas like Irbid and Jerash, had an estimated population of 100,000 inhabitants.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the estimated population of the Balqa region, including Amman and Salt, in March 1921?: The Balqa region, which included the cities of Amman and Salt, along with Madaba, was estimated to have a population of 80,000 in March 1921, according to British figures. This region was the second most populous administrative area within the Emirate.
  • What was the estimated total population of Transjordan in March 1921, according to British estimates?: The British estimated the total population of Transjordan in March 1921 to be 230,000. This estimate was broken down by region, with the Ajlun area having the largest population (100,000) and the Ma'an, Aqaba, and Tabuk region having the smallest (10,000).
  • What was the estimated population of the Ajlun region, including Irbid and Jerash, in March 1921?: According to the March 1921 British estimate, the Ajlun region, which encompassed Irbid, Jerash, the Bani Hasan country, and the Mafraq bedouins, had an estimated population of 100,000. This made it the most populous administrative region within Transjordan at that time.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy