Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO): Establishment, Mandate, and Governance

At a Glance

Title: The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO): Establishment, Mandate, and Governance

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Genesis and Legal Foundations: 15 flashcards, 24 questions
  • Organizational Structure and Governance: 11 flashcards, 21 questions
  • Jurisdiction and Operational Mandate: 6 flashcards, 11 questions
  • Implementation and Early Challenges: 7 flashcards, 7 questions
  • Member State Engagement and Expansion: 7 flashcards, 10 questions
  • Administrative Framework and Resources: 4 flashcards, 7 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 50
  • True/False Questions: 43
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 37
  • Total Questions: 80

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO): Establishment, Mandate, and Governance

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "European Public Prosecutor's Office" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO): Establishment, Mandate, and Governance

Study Guide: The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO): Establishment, Mandate, and Governance

Genesis and Legal Foundations

The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) is an independent body of the European Union that was established through a method of enhanced cooperation among all 27 EU member states.

Answer: False

The EPPO was established through enhanced cooperation among 24 of the 27 EU member states, not all 27.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) and what is its legal status?: The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) is an independent body of the European Union (EU) with juridical personality. It was established under the Treaty of Lisbon through a method of enhanced cooperation among 24 of the 27 EU member states, granting it distinct legal rights and obligations.
  • Which EU member states are currently participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation?: Currently, 24 EU member states are participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation. These include Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden.

Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, adopted on October 12, 2017, serves as the EPPO's legal basis.

Answer: True

Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, adopted on October 12, 2017, formally established the EPPO and serves as its legal basis.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the EPPO formally established and what legislative act formalized its creation?: The EPPO was formally established with the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 on October 12, 2017. This regulation provides the EPPO's comprehensive legal basis, outlining its objectives, structure, jurisdiction, and operational procedures.

Franco Frattini, a former Commissioner, was an early and strong advocate for the establishment of the EPPO.

Answer: True

Franco Frattini, former Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security, strongly advocated for the EPPO in August 2007.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was an early and strong advocate for the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office?: Franco Frattini, the former Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security, was a prominent early supporter of the EPPO. In August 2007, he articulated his conviction that Europe would eventually establish a general prosecutor to combat financial crime, fraud, and counterfeiting at the European level.

The Treaty of Lisbon explicitly rejected the idea of creating a European Public Prosecutor's Office.

Answer: False

The Treaty of Lisbon explicitly referred to the idea of creating a European Public Prosecutor's Office, providing a legal foundation for its eventual establishment.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Treaty of Lisbon influence the creation of the EPPO?: The Treaty of Lisbon, signed in late 2007 by all EU Member States, explicitly included a provision for the creation of a European Public Prosecutor's Office. This foundational legal reference was intended to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union and, potentially, serious cross-border crime.

The International Seminar in Madrid, led by Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido, studied the new institution and its implementation possibilities.

Answer: True

The International Seminar in Madrid, led by Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido, was indeed dedicated to studying the new institution and its implementation possibilities.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the International Seminar in Madrid regarding the EPPO?: The International Seminar in Madrid, convened by Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido, meticulously studied the new institution and its implementation possibilities. Its comprehensive presentations, discussions, and published conclusions in 'The future European Public Prosecutor's Office' have since informed subsequent proposals for the EPPO's establishment.

Spain advocated for the EPPO's role in protecting the euro currency in 2010 after a major banking crisis in Greece.

Answer: False

Spain advocated for the EPPO's role in protecting the euro in 2010 following the short selling of certain euro-zone financial products, not a banking crisis in Greece.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific incident prompted Spain to advocate for the EPPO's role in protecting the euro currency in 2010?: Following the short selling of certain euro-zone financial products in 2009 and 2010, Spain proposed activating the European Public Prosecutor's Office provision. Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido stated in March 2010 that this office could coordinate legal action to safeguard the euro against speculative activities.

In 2010, Eurojust opposed the concept of the EPPO, citing concerns about national sovereignty.

Answer: False

In March 2010, Eurojust identified the EPPO as a potential solution to cross-border crime and established a working group to study it, despite some member states' concerns about sovereignty.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Eurojust's perspective on the EPPO in 2010, despite initial opposition from some member states?: In March 2010, Eurojust recognized the European Public Prosecutor's Office as a potential solution to the complex challenge of cross-border crime within the EU. Despite concerns from some member states regarding national sovereignty and the need for legal code harmonization, Eurojust proceeded to establish a dedicated working group to further examine the concept.

The creation of the EPPO was discussed and immediately approved at the Luxembourg Council in April 2010.

Answer: False

The creation of the EPPO was discussed at the Luxembourg Council in April 2010, but its implementation was suspended, with further discussion planned for 2013.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the discussion on the EPPO's creation at the Luxembourg Council in April 2010?: The creation of the EPPO was deliberated by the Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs in Luxembourg on April 27, 2010, following the Spanish proposal. However, its implementation was suspended at that time, with further discussion deferred until 2013.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso announced the upcoming proposal for the EPPO in his 2012 State of the Union speech.

Answer: True

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso announced the upcoming proposal for the EPPO in his State of the Union speech on September 12, 2012.

Related Concepts:

  • When did European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso announce the upcoming proposal for the EPPO?: European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso announced on September 12, 2012, in his State of the Union speech to the European Parliament, that a proposal for the creation of a European Public Prosecutor would be presented imminently, underscoring the Commission's commitment to upholding the rule of law.

The European Commission proposed the regulation for the EPPO's establishment in July 2013 at the initiative of Vice-president Viviane Reding and Commissioner Algirdas Semeta.

Answer: True

The European Commission proposed the regulation for the EPPO's establishment on July 17, 2013, at the initiative of Vice-President Viviane Reding and Commissioner Algirdas Semeta.

Related Concepts:

  • Which European Commissioners were instrumental in proposing the regulation for the EPPO's establishment in July 2013?: The European Commission, driven by the initiative of Vice-President Viviane Reding and Commissioner Algirdas Semeta, formally proposed a regulation for the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) on July 17, 2013.

The European Commission concluded in November 2013 that the EPPO complied with the principle of subsidiarity, despite concerns from several national parliaments.

Answer: True

In November 2013, the European Commission indeed concluded that the EPPO complied with the principle of subsidiarity, addressing concerns from national parliaments.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the European Commission address concerns about subsidiarity regarding the EPPO in November 2013?: In November 2013, following concerns raised by 14 national parliamentary chambers in 11 Member States, the European Commission concluded in a report that the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office complied with the principle of subsidiarity. This principle ensures that decisions are made at the most appropriate level of governance, as close to the citizen as possible.

The enhanced cooperation for the EPPO was initiated under TFEU Article 86, which requires authorization from the Council.

Answer: False

Enhanced cooperation under TFEU Article 86 does not require authorization from the Council to proceed, allowing a simplified procedure.

Related Concepts:

  • Under which Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) article was the enhanced cooperation for the EPPO established?: The enhanced cooperation for the establishment of the EPPO was initiated under TFEU Article 86. This article facilitates a simplified enhanced cooperation procedure that does not necessitate authorization from the Council to proceed, thereby enabling a subset of member states to advance with deeper integration.

What is the legal status of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO)?

Answer: It is an independent body of the European Union with juridical personality.

The EPPO is an independent body of the European Union, possessing juridical personality, meaning it has its own legal rights and obligations.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) and what is its legal status?: The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) is an independent body of the European Union (EU) with juridical personality. It was established under the Treaty of Lisbon through a method of enhanced cooperation among 24 of the 27 EU member states, granting it distinct legal rights and obligations.

When was the EPPO formally established through the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939?

Answer: October 12, 2017

The EPPO was formally established with the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 on October 12, 2017.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the EPPO formally established and what legislative act formalized its creation?: The EPPO was formally established with the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 on October 12, 2017. This regulation provides the EPPO's comprehensive legal basis, outlining its objectives, structure, jurisdiction, and operational procedures.

Who was an early and strong advocate for the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office, expressing conviction in August 2007?

Answer: Franco Frattini

Franco Frattini, former Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security, was an early and strong advocate for the EPPO, expressing his conviction in August 2007.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was an early and strong advocate for the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office?: Franco Frattini, the former Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security, was a prominent early supporter of the EPPO. In August 2007, he articulated his conviction that Europe would eventually establish a general prosecutor to combat financial crime, fraud, and counterfeiting at the European level.

How did the Treaty of Lisbon contribute to the creation of the EPPO?

Answer: It explicitly referred to the idea of creating a European Public Prosecutor's Office.

The Treaty of Lisbon explicitly referred to the idea of creating a European Public Prosecutor's Office, providing a crucial legal foundation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Treaty of Lisbon influence the creation of the EPPO?: The Treaty of Lisbon, signed in late 2007 by all EU Member States, explicitly included a provision for the creation of a European Public Prosecutor's Office. This foundational legal reference was intended to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union and, potentially, serious cross-border crime.

What was the primary purpose of the International Seminar in Madrid regarding the EPPO?

Answer: To study the new institution and its implementation possibilities.

The International Seminar in Madrid was convened to study the new institution of the EPPO and its implementation possibilities.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the International Seminar in Madrid regarding the EPPO?: The International Seminar in Madrid, convened by Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido, meticulously studied the new institution and its implementation possibilities. Its comprehensive presentations, discussions, and published conclusions in 'The future European Public Prosecutor's Office' have since informed subsequent proposals for the EPPO's establishment.

What incident prompted Spain to advocate for the EPPO's role in protecting the euro currency in 2010?

Answer: The short selling of certain euro-zone financial products in 2009 and 2010.

Spain's advocacy for the EPPO's role in protecting the euro in 2010 was prompted by the short selling of certain euro-zone financial products.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific incident prompted Spain to advocate for the EPPO's role in protecting the euro currency in 2010?: Following the short selling of certain euro-zone financial products in 2009 and 2010, Spain proposed activating the European Public Prosecutor's Office provision. Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido stated in March 2010 that this office could coordinate legal action to safeguard the euro against speculative activities.

What was Eurojust's stance on the EPPO in March 2010?

Answer: It identified the EPPO as a potential solution to cross-border crime and established a working group.

In March 2010, Eurojust identified the EPPO as a potential solution to cross-border crime and established a working group to study the concept.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Eurojust's perspective on the EPPO in 2010, despite initial opposition from some member states?: In March 2010, Eurojust recognized the European Public Prosecutor's Office as a potential solution to the complex challenge of cross-border crime within the EU. Despite concerns from some member states regarding national sovereignty and the need for legal code harmonization, Eurojust proceeded to establish a dedicated working group to further examine the concept.

Who officially launched a technical draft for the implementation of the European Prosecutor during the Spanish Presidency in March 2010?

Answer: Cándido Conde-Pumpido

Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido officially launched a technical draft for the implementation of the European Prosecutor in March 2010.

Related Concepts:

  • When and by whom was a formal draft for the EPPO's implementation launched during the Spanish Presidency?: In March 2010, during the Spanish Presidency, Spanish Attorney General Cándido Conde-Pumpido officially launched a technical draft for the implementation of the European Prosecutor. This initiative was grounded in Article 86 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and built upon conclusions from international conferences held in 2008 and 2009.

What was the outcome of the discussion on the EPPO's creation at the Luxembourg Council in April 2010?

Answer: Implementation was suspended, with further discussion planned for 2013.

At the Luxembourg Council in April 2010, the EPPO's implementation was suspended, with further discussion planned for 2013.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the discussion on the EPPO's creation at the Luxembourg Council in April 2010?: The creation of the EPPO was deliberated by the Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs in Luxembourg on April 27, 2010, following the Spanish proposal. However, its implementation was suspended at that time, with further discussion deferred until 2013.

Which European Commissioners were instrumental in proposing the regulation for the EPPO's establishment in July 2013?

Answer: Viviane Reding and Algirdas Semeta

Vice-President Viviane Reding and Commissioner Algirdas Semeta were instrumental in proposing the regulation for the EPPO's establishment in July 2013.

Related Concepts:

  • Which European Commissioners were instrumental in proposing the regulation for the EPPO's establishment in July 2013?: The European Commission, driven by the initiative of Vice-President Viviane Reding and Commissioner Algirdas Semeta, formally proposed a regulation for the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) on July 17, 2013.

How did the European Commission respond to concerns about subsidiarity regarding the EPPO in November 2013?

Answer: It concluded that the EPPO complied with the principle of subsidiarity.

In November 2013, the European Commission concluded that the EPPO complied with the principle of subsidiarity, despite concerns from national parliaments.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the European Commission address concerns about subsidiarity regarding the EPPO in November 2013?: In November 2013, following concerns raised by 14 national parliamentary chambers in 11 Member States, the European Commission concluded in a report that the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office complied with the principle of subsidiarity. This principle ensures that decisions are made at the most appropriate level of governance, as close to the citizen as possible.

Under which TFEU article was the enhanced cooperation for the EPPO established?

Answer: Article 86 TFEU

The enhanced cooperation for the EPPO was established under TFEU Article 86.

Related Concepts:

  • Under which Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) article was the enhanced cooperation for the EPPO established?: The enhanced cooperation for the establishment of the EPPO was initiated under TFEU Article 86. This article facilitates a simplified enhanced cooperation procedure that does not necessitate authorization from the Council to proceed, thereby enabling a subset of member states to advance with deeper integration.

Organizational Structure and Governance

Laura Codruța Kövesi, from Romania, was appointed as the first European Chief Prosecutor for a non-renewable 5-year term.

Answer: False

Laura Codruța Kövesi was appointed for a non-renewable 7-year term, not 5 years.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was appointed as the first European Chief Prosecutor, and when was this agreed upon?: Laura Codruța Kövesi, from Romania, was agreed upon by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to be appointed as the first European Chief Prosecutor on September 23, 2019. She officially commenced her non-renewable 7-year term on October 31, 2019.

The EPPO operates with a single-tiered, centralized structure, with all investigations managed directly from its headquarters.

Answer: False

The EPPO operates with a two-tiered, hybrid structure, combining central oversight with decentralized investigations carried out by European Delegated Prosecutors at the national level.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the two-tiered or hybrid structure of the EPPO.: The EPPO operates with a two-tiered, hybrid structure. At the central level, it is led by the European Chief Prosecutor, supported by 22 European Prosecutors and technical staff. At the national level, European Delegated Prosecutors are embedded in each participating Member State, conducting investigations and prosecutions locally, thereby combining centralized oversight with decentralized action.

The European Chief Prosecutor is responsible for organizing the EPPO's work, directing its activities, and representing the office externally.

Answer: True

The European Chief Prosecutor is indeed responsible for organizing the EPPO's work, directing its activities, and representing the office externally, as well as presiding over the College.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the key responsibilities of the European Chief Prosecutor?: The European Chief Prosecutor serves as the head of the EPPO, responsible for organizing its overall work, directing its operational activities, and representing the office externally. The Chief Prosecutor also presides over the College of the EPPO.

The College of the EPPO consists of the European Chief Prosecutor and two European Prosecutors from each participating Member State.

Answer: False

The College of the EPPO consists of the European Chief Prosecutor and one European Prosecutor from each participating Member State.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the composition of the College, the governing body of the EPPO?: The College of the EPPO, which functions as its governing body, comprises the European Chief Prosecutor and one European Prosecutor from each participating Member State. Two of these European Prosecutors also fulfill the role of Deputies for the European Chief Prosecutor.

European Prosecutors primarily supervise the European Delegated Prosecutors who conduct investigations on the ground.

Answer: True

The primary role of European Prosecutors is to supervise the European Delegated Prosecutors who conduct the actual investigations in member states.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary role of the European Prosecutors within the EPPO's structure?: The European Prosecutors, distinct from the European Chief Prosecutor and European Delegated Prosecutors, primarily supervise the European Delegated Prosecutors. These Delegated Prosecutors are responsible for conducting investigations on the ground within the participating Member States.

The first cohort of European Prosecutors was sworn in before a judge at the European Court of Justice in September 2020.

Answer: True

The first cohort of European Prosecutors was sworn in before a judge at the European Court of Justice on September 28, 2020.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the first cohort of European Prosecutors appointed and sworn into office?: The first cohort of European Prosecutors was appointed by the Council of the EU at the end of July 2020. They were subsequently sworn in before a judge at the European Court of Justice on September 28, 2020.

The internal decision-making rules for the College of the EPPO are known as the Statutes of Procedure.

Answer: False

The internal decision-making rules for the College of the EPPO are referred to as the Procedural Rules.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the internal decision-making rules for the College of the EPPO called?: The internal decision-making rules governing the College of the EPPO are formally referred to as the Procedural Rules.

Each Permanent Chamber of the EPPO consists of five members, including the European Chief Prosecutor.

Answer: False

Each Permanent Chamber of the EPPO consists of three members: two European Prosecutors and a chairperson.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the composition and main responsibility of the Permanent Chambers of the EPPO?: Each Permanent Chamber of the EPPO consists of three members: two European Prosecutors and a chairperson, who may be the European Chief Prosecutor, one of their deputies, or another European Prosecutor. These Chambers are responsible for overseeing investigations conducted by the European Delegated Prosecutors and making critical decisions, such as filing charges or discontinuing proceedings.

The 'right of evocation' allows national authorities to take over a case from a European Delegated Prosecutor.

Answer: False

The 'right of evocation' allows the Permanent Chambers of the EPPO to take over a case from a European Delegated Prosecutor, not national authorities.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'right of evocation' in the context of the EPPO's Permanent Chambers?: The 'right of evocation,' as stipulated in Article 27 of the EPPO Regulation, is a power that can be exercised by the Permanent Chambers. This right enables the Chambers to assume control of a case from a European Delegated Prosecutor, thereby ensuring central oversight and consistency in investigations.

European Delegated Prosecutors operate independently, free from instructions by national authorities, when prosecuting PIF offenses.

Answer: True

European Delegated Prosecutors operate independently from national authorities when prosecuting PIF offenses, ensuring the EPPO's autonomy.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the core function of the European Delegated Prosecutors?: European Delegated Prosecutors (EDPs) are central to the EPPO's investigative work, operating locally within their respective member states. They are responsible for prosecuting PIF offenses and function independently, free from instructions by national authorities, in these specific duties.

European Delegated Prosecutors possess the same powers as national public prosecutors and can issue European Arrest Warrants.

Answer: True

European Delegated Prosecutors possess the same powers as national public prosecutors and are additionally granted powers by Union law, such as the ability to issue or request a European Arrest Warrant.

Related Concepts:

  • What powers do European Delegated Prosecutors exercise in participating member states?: European Delegated Prosecutors (EDPs) in participating member states execute the functions of the EPPO and possess the same powers as national public prosecutors. Furthermore, they are vested with additional powers by Union law, such as the authority to issue a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) or to request a competent national judicial authority to issue one.

Who was appointed as the first European Chief Prosecutor?

Answer: Laura Codruța Kövesi

Laura Codruța Kövesi was appointed as the first European Chief Prosecutor.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was appointed as the first European Chief Prosecutor, and when was this agreed upon?: Laura Codruța Kövesi, from Romania, was agreed upon by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to be appointed as the first European Chief Prosecutor on September 23, 2019. She officially commenced her non-renewable 7-year term on October 31, 2019.

What describes the structure of the EPPO?

Answer: A two-tiered, hybrid structure with central and national levels.

The EPPO operates with a two-tiered, hybrid structure, combining central leadership with decentralized operations by European Delegated Prosecutors.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the two-tiered or hybrid structure of the EPPO.: The EPPO operates with a two-tiered, hybrid structure. At the central level, it is led by the European Chief Prosecutor, supported by 22 European Prosecutors and technical staff. At the national level, European Delegated Prosecutors are embedded in each participating Member State, conducting investigations and prosecutions locally, thereby combining centralized oversight with decentralized action.

What is a key responsibility of the European Chief Prosecutor?

Answer: To organize the EPPO's work and represent the office externally.

A key responsibility of the European Chief Prosecutor is to organize the EPPO's work, direct its activities, and represent the office externally.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the key responsibilities of the European Chief Prosecutor?: The European Chief Prosecutor serves as the head of the EPPO, responsible for organizing its overall work, directing its operational activities, and representing the office externally. The Chief Prosecutor also presides over the College of the EPPO.

What is the composition of the College, the governing body of the EPPO?

Answer: The European Chief Prosecutor and one European Prosecutor from each participating Member State.

The College of the EPPO consists of the European Chief Prosecutor and one European Prosecutor from each participating Member State.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the composition of the College, the governing body of the EPPO?: The College of the EPPO, which functions as its governing body, comprises the European Chief Prosecutor and one European Prosecutor from each participating Member State. Two of these European Prosecutors also fulfill the role of Deputies for the European Chief Prosecutor.

What is the primary role of the European Prosecutors within the EPPO's structure (distinct from the Chief Prosecutor and Delegated Prosecutors)?

Answer: To supervise the European Delegated Prosecutors.

The primary role of European Prosecutors is to supervise the European Delegated Prosecutors who conduct investigations on the ground.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary role of the European Prosecutors within the EPPO's structure?: The European Prosecutors, distinct from the European Chief Prosecutor and European Delegated Prosecutors, primarily supervise the European Delegated Prosecutors. These Delegated Prosecutors are responsible for conducting investigations on the ground within the participating Member States.

When were the first cohort of European Prosecutors sworn into office?

Answer: September 28, 2020

The first cohort of European Prosecutors was sworn in before a judge at the European Court of Justice on September 28, 2020.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the first cohort of European Prosecutors appointed and sworn into office?: The first cohort of European Prosecutors was appointed by the Council of the EU at the end of July 2020. They were subsequently sworn in before a judge at the European Court of Justice on September 28, 2020.

What are the internal decision-making rules for the College of the EPPO called?

Answer: The Procedural Rules

The internal decision-making rules for the College of the EPPO are called the Procedural Rules.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the internal decision-making rules for the College of the EPPO called?: The internal decision-making rules governing the College of the EPPO are formally referred to as the Procedural Rules.

What is the 'right of evocation' in the context of the EPPO's Permanent Chambers?

Answer: The power of the Permanent Chambers to take over a case from a European Delegated Prosecutor.

The 'right of evocation' is the power of the Permanent Chambers to take over a case from a European Delegated Prosecutor, ensuring central oversight.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'right of evocation' in the context of the EPPO's Permanent Chambers?: The 'right of evocation,' as stipulated in Article 27 of the EPPO Regulation, is a power that can be exercised by the Permanent Chambers. This right enables the Chambers to assume control of a case from a European Delegated Prosecutor, thereby ensuring central oversight and consistency in investigations.

What is the core function of the European Delegated Prosecutors?

Answer: To carry out investigations and prosecutions locally within their respective member states.

The core function of European Delegated Prosecutors is to carry out investigations and prosecutions locally within their respective member states.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the core function of the European Delegated Prosecutors?: European Delegated Prosecutors (EDPs) are central to the EPPO's investigative work, operating locally within their respective member states. They are responsible for prosecuting PIF offenses and function independently, free from instructions by national authorities, in these specific duties.

What additional powers do European Delegated Prosecutors possess beyond those of national public prosecutors?

Answer: The power to issue a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) or request one.

European Delegated Prosecutors possess the additional power to issue a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) or request one.

Related Concepts:

  • What powers do European Delegated Prosecutors exercise in participating member states?: European Delegated Prosecutors (EDPs) in participating member states execute the functions of the EPPO and possess the same powers as national public prosecutors. Furthermore, they are vested with additional powers by Union law, such as the authority to issue a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) or to request a competent national judicial authority to issue one.

Jurisdiction and Operational Mandate

The EPPO's primary mandate is to investigate and prosecute offenses that harm the financial interests of the EU, as defined by the PIF Directive.

Answer: True

The EPPO's primary mandate is indeed to investigate and prosecute offenses harming the financial interests of the EU, as specifically defined by Directive (EU) 2017/1371 (the PIF Directive).

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary mandate and jurisdiction of the EPPO?: The EPPO's primary mandate is to investigate and prosecute offenses that harm the financial interests of the EU, encompassing fraud, corruption, and money laundering. These specific criminal offenses are precisely defined by Directive (EU) 2017/1371, known as the PIF Directive.

One of the main options considered for the EPPO's mandate during the Barroso Commission proposals was to extend its scope to cover all types of criminal offenses across the EU.

Answer: False

One of the options considered was an extended mandate covering PIF offenses and other serious cross-border crimes, not 'all types of criminal offenses across the EU'.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the three main options considered for the scope of the EPPO's mandate during the Barroso Commission proposals?: During the Barroso Commission proposals, three primary options for the EPPO's scope were evaluated: maintaining criminal investigations of PIF offenses exclusively by Member State authorities, establishing the EPPO with a limited mandate for PIF offenses, or establishing the EPPO with an extended mandate covering PIF offenses and other serious cross-border crimes such as money laundering, corruption, and accounting offenses.

The establishment of the EPPO was expected to reduce irregularities affecting the European budget by potentially more than €500 million annually.

Answer: False

The establishment of the EPPO was projected to reduce irregularities affecting the European budget by potentially exceeding €1 billion annually, not €500 million.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the anticipated positive impacts of establishing the EPPO, according to the Barroso Commission proposals?: The establishment of the EPPO was projected to result in more effective, dissuasive, and consistent criminal law protection of the Union's financial interests. It was anticipated that irregularities affecting the European budget, potentially exceeding €1 billion annually, could be significantly reduced through the EPPO's direct investigations and prosecutions across the EU, while also achieving economies of scale for justice budgets.

The EPPO's jurisdiction includes fraud concerning EU funds exceeding €5,000 and cross-border VAT fraud cases above €5 million.

Answer: False

The EPPO's jurisdiction covers fraud concerning EU funds exceeding €10,000 and cross-border VAT fraud cases where damages are above €10 million.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific financial thresholds define the EPPO's jurisdiction for fraud concerning EU funds and cross-border VAT fraud?: The EPPO is mandated to investigate and prosecute fraud against the EU budget, specifically including fraud concerning EU funds exceeding €10,000, and cross-border Value Added Tax (VAT) fraud cases where the damages amount to more than €10 million.

Unlike previous bodies like OLAF and Eurojust, the EPPO has the authority to directly investigate and prosecute crimes across participating member states.

Answer: True

The EPPO's unique authority lies in its ability to directly investigate and prosecute crimes across participating member states, a power not held by OLAF or Eurojust.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the EPPO's authority enhance the fight against EU financial crimes compared to previous bodies?: Unlike previous bodies such as OLAF, Eurojust, and Europol, which faced limitations in direct prosecution, the EPPO possesses the authority to directly investigate and prosecute crimes across participating member states. This represents a significant advancement towards a more integrated and effective approach to combating EU financial crimes.

The EPPO's mission is limited to investigating and prosecuting offenses affecting the financial interests of the Union, and it cannot be expanded to cover other serious cross-border crimes.

Answer: False

While the EPPO's current mission is limited to financial interests of the Union, its mission may be extended in the future to cover other serious cross-border crimes through treaty amendment.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the limited mission of the EPPO, and how might it be expanded in the future?: The EPPO's current mission is specifically limited to investigating, prosecuting, and bringing to judgment individuals suspected of offenses affecting the financial interests of the Union, as defined by the PIF Directive, before national courts. However, its mission may be extended in the future to encompass other serious cross-border crimes, contingent upon a treaty amendment by the European Council.

Which directive defines the specific criminal offenses that fall under the EPPO's primary mandate?

Answer: Directive (EU) 2017/1371 (PIF Directive)

Directive (EU) 2017/1371, known as the PIF Directive, defines the specific criminal offenses that fall under the EPPO's primary mandate.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary mandate and jurisdiction of the EPPO?: The EPPO's primary mandate is to investigate and prosecute offenses that harm the financial interests of the EU, encompassing fraud, corruption, and money laundering. These specific criminal offenses are precisely defined by Directive (EU) 2017/1371, known as the PIF Directive.

Which of the following was NOT one of the three main options considered for the scope of the EPPO's mandate during the Barroso Commission proposals?

Answer: Expanding the EPPO's mandate to include all national criminal offenses.

The three main options considered were maintaining national investigations, a limited PIF mandate, or an extended PIF mandate covering other serious cross-border crimes, but not 'all national criminal offenses'.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the three main options considered for the scope of the EPPO's mandate during the Barroso Commission proposals?: During the Barroso Commission proposals, three primary options for the EPPO's scope were evaluated: maintaining criminal investigations of PIF offenses exclusively by Member State authorities, establishing the EPPO with a limited mandate for PIF offenses, or establishing the EPPO with an extended mandate covering PIF offenses and other serious cross-border crimes such as money laundering, corruption, and accounting offenses.

What was the anticipated annual reduction in irregularities affecting the European budget due to the EPPO, according to Barroso Commission proposals?

Answer: Potentially exceeding €1 billion.

The establishment of the EPPO was projected to reduce irregularities affecting the European budget by potentially exceeding €1 billion annually.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the anticipated positive impacts of establishing the EPPO, according to the Barroso Commission proposals?: The establishment of the EPPO was projected to result in more effective, dissuasive, and consistent criminal law protection of the Union's financial interests. It was anticipated that irregularities affecting the European budget, potentially exceeding €1 billion annually, could be significantly reduced through the EPPO's direct investigations and prosecutions across the EU, while also achieving economies of scale for justice budgets.

What is the financial threshold for cross-border VAT fraud cases to fall under the EPPO's jurisdiction?

Answer: Damages above €10 million

The EPPO's jurisdiction covers cross-border VAT fraud cases where the damages are above €10 million.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific financial thresholds define the EPPO's jurisdiction for fraud concerning EU funds and cross-border VAT fraud?: The EPPO is mandated to investigate and prosecute fraud against the EU budget, specifically including fraud concerning EU funds exceeding €10,000, and cross-border Value Added Tax (VAT) fraud cases where the damages amount to more than €10 million.

How does the EPPO's authority differ from previous bodies like OLAF, Eurojust, and Europol in combating EU financial crimes?

Answer: The EPPO has the authority to directly investigate and prosecute crimes across participating member states.

Unlike previous bodies, the EPPO has the unique authority to directly investigate and prosecute crimes across participating member states.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the EPPO's authority enhance the fight against EU financial crimes compared to previous bodies?: Unlike previous bodies such as OLAF, Eurojust, and Europol, which faced limitations in direct prosecution, the EPPO possesses the authority to directly investigate and prosecute crimes across participating member states. This represents a significant advancement towards a more integrated and effective approach to combating EU financial crimes.

Implementation and Early Challenges

Finland initially delayed appointing its European Delegated Prosecutors due to a disagreement over their proposed salaries.

Answer: False

Finland delayed appointing its European Delegated Prosecutors due to a disagreement over whether they should be part-time or full-time, not their salaries.

Related Concepts:

  • What caused the delay in Finland appointing its European Delegated Prosecutors when the EPPO launched operations?: When the EPPO commenced operations on June 1, 2021, Finland had not yet appointed its European Delegated Prosecutors due to a disagreement. The Finnish government advocated for part-time prosecutors, citing a low anticipated workload, whereas European Chief Prosecutor Laura Kövesi insisted on full-time contracts for all European Delegated Prosecutors to ensure consistent dedication.

The 'Janša Appointment Affair' in Slovenia involved the acting head of government preventing the nomination of two Slovenian European Delegated Prosecutors.

Answer: True

The 'Janša Appointment Affair' involved Slovenia's acting head of government, Janez Janša, preventing the nomination of two Slovenian European Delegated Prosecutors.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Janša Appointment Affair' concerning Slovenia's European Delegated Prosecutors?: The 'Janša Appointment Affair' refers to the controversy where Slovenia's acting head of government, Janez Janša, obstructed the selection and nomination of two Slovenian European Delegated Prosecutors shortly before the EPPO's launch. This incident led to the resignation of Slovenia's Justice Minister, Lilijana Kozlovič, and raised significant concerns about political interference in judicial appointments.

The EPPO officially launched its operations on June 1, 2021.

Answer: True

The EPPO officially launched its operations on June 1, 2021, following the European Commission's approval.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the EPPO officially begin its operations?: The EPPO officially launched its operations on June 1, 2021, following the European Commission's decision to approve the commencement of investigations and prosecutions on May 6, 2021. This operational start occurred three years after the Regulation entered into force in November 2017, as stipulated by its terms.

The interim director of the EPPO was responsible for managing the interim administrative apparatus and recruitment during the establishment phase.

Answer: True

The interim director was responsible for managing the interim administrative apparatus, recruitment, financial liquidity, and finding a suitable location during the EPPO's establishment phase.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the role of the interim director during the establishment phase of the EPPO?: During the EPPO's establishment phase, an interim director, an official of the European Commission appointed after Council consultation, performed duties under Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939. These responsibilities included managing the interim administrative apparatus, overseeing recruitment, ensuring financial liquidity for the initial phase, and securing a suitable location in Luxembourg.

What caused the delay in Finland appointing its European Delegated Prosecutors when the EPPO launched operations?

Answer: A disagreement over whether prosecutors should be part-time or full-time.

Finland's delay in appointing EDPs was due to a disagreement over whether they should be part-time or full-time.

Related Concepts:

  • What caused the delay in Finland appointing its European Delegated Prosecutors when the EPPO launched operations?: When the EPPO commenced operations on June 1, 2021, Finland had not yet appointed its European Delegated Prosecutors due to a disagreement. The Finnish government advocated for part-time prosecutors, citing a low anticipated workload, whereas European Chief Prosecutor Laura Kövesi insisted on full-time contracts for all European Delegated Prosecutors to ensure consistent dedication.

What was the alleged reason behind Janez Janša's opposition to the Slovenian prosecutor nominations in the 'Janša Appointment Affair'?

Answer: The nominated prosecutors had previously investigated him.

It was alleged that Janez Janša opposed the nominations because the prosecutors had previously investigated him.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the alleged reason behind Janez Janša's opposition to the Slovenian prosecutor nominations?: Media outlets, including ORF, reported allegations that Janez Janša might have opposed the nomination of the two Slovenian prosecutors because they had previously been involved in investigations against him. This suggested a potential conflict of interest or an attempt to circumvent judicial scrutiny.

When did the EPPO officially begin its operations?

Answer: June 1, 2021

The EPPO officially began its operations on June 1, 2021.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the EPPO officially begin its operations?: The EPPO officially launched its operations on June 1, 2021, following the European Commission's decision to approve the commencement of investigations and prosecutions on May 6, 2021. This operational start occurred three years after the Regulation entered into force in November 2017, as stipulated by its terms.

Member State Engagement and Expansion

All 27 EU member states are currently participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation.

Answer: False

Currently, 24 EU member states are participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation, not all 27.

Related Concepts:

  • Which EU member states are currently participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation?: Currently, 24 EU member states are participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation. These include Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden.

Denmark is not participating in the EPPO due to an opt-out from the area of freedom, security, and justice.

Answer: True

Denmark is indeed not participating in the EPPO due to its opt-out from the area of freedom, security, and justice.

Related Concepts:

  • Which EU member states are currently not participating in the EPPO, and what are their reasons?: Denmark is not participating due to an opt-out from the area of freedom, security, and justice (AFSJ). Ireland also has an opt-out from the AFSJ but retains the ability to opt-in on a case-by-case basis and is preparing legislation to do so. Hungary is also not participating, although its opposition Tisza Party has publicly committed to joining if elected.

The Netherlands and Malta joined the EPPO after its initial establishment, with their participation approved in August 2018.

Answer: True

The Netherlands and Malta requested to join in May and June 2018, respectively, and their participation was approved in August 2018.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Netherlands and Malta join the EPPO after its initial establishment?: The Netherlands formally requested to join the EPPO on May 14, 2018, with its participation approved by the Commission on August 1, 2018. Malta requested to join on June 14, 2018, and its participation was approved on August 7, 2018, illustrating the flexibility for additional states to accede to the enhanced cooperation framework.

Poland applied to join the EPPO in January 2024 and its application was approved in February 2024.

Answer: True

Poland applied to join the EPPO on January 5, 2024, and its application was approved on February 29, 2024.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Poland apply to join the EPPO, and when was its application approved?: Poland formally applied to join the EPPO on January 5, 2024, following the installation of the Tusk III Cabinet. Its application was subsequently approved by the European Commission on February 29, 2024.

Sweden officially notified its request to participate in the EPPO in June 2024, and the EU Commission approved it in July 2024.

Answer: True

Sweden officially notified its request to participate on June 5, 2024, and the EU Commission approved it on July 16, 2024.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Sweden's current status regarding participation in the EPPO?: Sweden's Prime Minister Stefan Löfven declared joining the EPPO a key EU policy objective in November 2019. In March 2024, the Swedish government submitted enabling legislation to parliament, which was approved on May 29. Sweden officially notified its request to participate on June 5, 2024, and the EU Commission approved it on July 16, 2024.

Ireland's government has decided against joining the EPPO, citing concerns about national sovereignty.

Answer: False

Ireland's government has accepted recommendations to opt-in to the EPPO and is preparing legislation to enable its participation.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the prospects for Ireland's future participation in the EPPO?: Ireland's government initiated the preparation of legislation in 2023 to facilitate its participation in the EPPO. In May 2025, a comprehensive review by the Irish Department of Justice recommended that Ireland opt-in to most EU programs under the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice, including the EPPO, recommendations which the Irish government accepted.

Which of the following EU member states is NOT currently participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation?

Answer: Hungary

Hungary is currently not participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation.

Related Concepts:

  • Which EU member states are currently participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation?: Currently, 24 EU member states are participating in the EPPO's enhanced cooperation. These include Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden.
  • Which EU member states are currently not participating in the EPPO, and what are their reasons?: Denmark is not participating due to an opt-out from the area of freedom, security, and justice (AFSJ). Ireland also has an opt-out from the AFSJ but retains the ability to opt-in on a case-by-case basis and is preparing legislation to do so. Hungary is also not participating, although its opposition Tisza Party has publicly committed to joining if elected.

When did Poland apply to join the EPPO?

Answer: January 5, 2024

Poland applied to join the EPPO on January 5, 2024.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Poland apply to join the EPPO, and when was its application approved?: Poland formally applied to join the EPPO on January 5, 2024, following the installation of the Tusk III Cabinet. Its application was subsequently approved by the European Commission on February 29, 2024.

What is Sweden's current status regarding participation in the EPPO as of July 2024?

Answer: It officially notified its request to participate, and the EU Commission approved it.

As of July 2024, Sweden officially notified its request to participate in the EPPO, and the EU Commission approved it.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Sweden's current status regarding participation in the EPPO?: Sweden's Prime Minister Stefan Löfven declared joining the EPPO a key EU policy objective in November 2019. In March 2024, the Swedish government submitted enabling legislation to parliament, which was approved on May 29. Sweden officially notified its request to participate on June 5, 2024, and the EU Commission approved it on July 16, 2024.

What is the commitment of Hungary's opposition Tisza Party regarding the EPPO?

Answer: To join the EPPO if they come into power.

Hungary's opposition Tisza Party has publicly committed to joining the EPPO if they come into power.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the commitment of Hungary's opposition Tisza Party regarding the EPPO?: Hungary's opposition Tisza Party, currently leading in opinion polling for the 2026 Hungarian parliamentary election, has publicly committed to joining the EPPO if they assume power.

Administrative Framework and Resources

The headquarters of the EPPO are located in Brussels, Belgium, sharing facilities with the European Commission.

Answer: False

The EPPO's headquarters are located in Kirchberg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, not Brussels.

Related Concepts:

  • Where are the headquarters of the European Public Prosecutor's Office located?: The EPPO's headquarters are situated in Kirchberg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. This location places it alongside other significant EU judicial bodies, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Auditors (ECA).
  • What is the architectural context of the EPPO headquarters in Luxembourg?: The EPPO headquarters are situated in Tower B of the Porte de l'Europe complex in Luxembourg. This architectural complex, designed by Ricardo Bofill Taller de Arquitectura, is strategically located adjacent to the twin towers of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The EPPO requested a budget increase in 2024 primarily to fund new IT infrastructure projects.

Answer: False

The EPPO requested a budget increase in 2024 due to the accelerated disbursement of EU recovery plan funds and the potential enlargement to include Poland and Sweden, not primarily for IT infrastructure.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did the EPPO request an increase in its 2024 budget?: In February 2024, the EPPO formally requested a €7.8 million increase to its 2024 budget, raising the total to €79.7 million. This increase was necessitated by the accelerated disbursement of the EU recovery plan funds and the anticipated enlargement of the EPPO to include Poland and Sweden.

English is the sole working language for all EPPO operational and administrative activities.

Answer: False

While English is the primary working language, French is also used in conjunction with English for communications with the European Court of Justice.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the working language of the EPPO for operational and administrative activities?: As per Article 1, Paragraph 1 of EPPO Decision 002/2020 (September 30, 2020), English is designated as the working language for the EPPO's operational and administrative activities. French is also utilized in conjunction with English for communications with the European Court of Justice.

The EPPO headquarters are located in Tower A of the Porte de l'Europe complex in Luxembourg.

Answer: False

The EPPO headquarters are situated in Tower B of the Porte de l'Europe complex in Luxembourg.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the architectural context of the EPPO headquarters in Luxembourg?: The EPPO headquarters are situated in Tower B of the Porte de l'Europe complex in Luxembourg. This architectural complex, designed by Ricardo Bofill Taller de Arquitectura, is strategically located adjacent to the twin towers of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Where are the headquarters of the European Public Prosecutor's Office located?

Answer: Kirchberg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg

The EPPO's headquarters are located in Kirchberg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Related Concepts:

  • Where are the headquarters of the European Public Prosecutor's Office located?: The EPPO's headquarters are situated in Kirchberg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. This location places it alongside other significant EU judicial bodies, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Auditors (ECA).

Why did the EPPO request an increase in its 2024 budget?

Answer: Due to accelerated disbursement of EU recovery plan funds and potential enlargement.

The EPPO requested a budget increase in 2024 due to the accelerated disbursement of EU recovery plan funds and the potential enlargement to include Poland and Sweden.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did the EPPO request an increase in its 2024 budget?: In February 2024, the EPPO formally requested a €7.8 million increase to its 2024 budget, raising the total to €79.7 million. This increase was necessitated by the accelerated disbursement of the EU recovery plan funds and the anticipated enlargement of the EPPO to include Poland and Sweden.

What is the primary working language for the EPPO's operational and administrative activities?

Answer: English

English is the primary working language for the EPPO's operational and administrative activities.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the working language of the EPPO for operational and administrative activities?: As per Article 1, Paragraph 1 of EPPO Decision 002/2020 (September 30, 2020), English is designated as the working language for the EPPO's operational and administrative activities. French is also utilized in conjunction with English for communications with the European Court of Justice.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy