Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


Eurovision Song Contest 1964: Production, Participants, and Historical Context

At a Glance

Title: Eurovision Song Contest 1964: Production, Participants, and Historical Context

Total Categories: 8

Category Stats

  • Event Logistics and Hosting: 6 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Participants and Notable Entries: 6 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Winning Performance and Outcomes: 12 flashcards, 10 questions
  • Production, Broadcast, and Media: 23 flashcards, 20 questions
  • Controversies and Incidents: 2 flashcards, 3 questions
  • Voting Mechanics and Scoring: 3 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Venue and Historical Context: 2 flashcards, 1 questions
  • Post-Event Recognition and Aftermath: 1 flashcards, 1 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 55
  • True/False Questions: 29
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 25
  • Total Questions: 54

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Eurovision Song Contest 1964: Production, Participants, and Historical Context

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Eurovision Song Contest 1964" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Eurovision Song Contest 1964: Production, Participants, and Historical Context

Study Guide: Eurovision Song Contest 1964: Production, Participants, and Historical Context

Event Logistics and Hosting

The 9th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest was held on March 21, 1964, in Copenhagen, Denmark, and was presented by Lotte Wæver.

Answer: True

The 9th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest was indeed held on March 21, 1964, at Tivolis Koncertsal in Copenhagen, Denmark, and presented by Lotte Wæver.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the host city and venue for the Eurovision Song Contest 1964, along with the name of its presenter.: The Eurovision Song Contest 1964 was staged at Tivolis Koncertsal in Copenhagen, Denmark, with Lotte Wæver serving as the presenter. Copenhagen, as the Danish capital, is renowned for its cultural vibrancy and historical significance.
  • Identify the official designation and sequential edition of the international song competition convened on March 21, 1964.: The international song competition conducted on March 21, 1964, was formally recognized as the 9th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest.

Denmark was chosen to host the 1964 contest because it had previously hosted the event twice before, demonstrating its experience.

Answer: False

Denmark was chosen to host the 1964 contest because Danmarks Radio (DR) had won the previous contest in 1963, not due to prior hosting experience.

Related Concepts:

  • Elucidate the rationale behind Denmark's selection as the host nation for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Denmark was designated as the host for the 1964 contest following Danmarks Radio's (DR) victory in the 1963 competition with 'Dansevise,' performed by Grethe and Jørgen Ingmann.

The 1964 Eurovision Song Contest was organized by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and hosted by the Swedish public broadcaster, Sveriges Radio (SR).

Answer: False

The 1964 Eurovision Song Contest was organized by the EBU but hosted by the *Danish* public broadcaster, Danmarks Radio (DR), not Sveriges Radio (SR).

Related Concepts:

  • Which entities bore the primary responsibility for organizing and hosting the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?: The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) organized the contest, while the Danish public broadcaster, Danmarks Radio (DR), served as the host. The EBU functions as an alliance of public service media organizations, fostering international media collaboration.

What was the official name and edition number of the international song competition held on March 21, 1964?

Answer: The 9th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest

The international song competition held on March 21, 1964, was officially designated as the 9th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the official designation and sequential edition of the international song competition convened on March 21, 1964.: The international song competition conducted on March 21, 1964, was formally recognized as the 9th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest.

Which city and venue hosted the Eurovision Song Contest 1964?

Answer: Copenhagen, Denmark at Tivolis Koncertsal

The Eurovision Song Contest 1964 was hosted in Copenhagen, Denmark, at Tivolis Koncertsal.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the host city and venue for the Eurovision Song Contest 1964, along with the name of its presenter.: The Eurovision Song Contest 1964 was staged at Tivolis Koncertsal in Copenhagen, Denmark, with Lotte Wæver serving as the presenter. Copenhagen, as the Danish capital, is renowned for its cultural vibrancy and historical significance.
  • Identify the precise venue for the 1964 contest and its geographical location.: The designated venue for the 1964 contest was Tivolis Koncertsal, or Tivoli Concert Hall, located within the Tivoli Gardens amusement park in Copenhagen. Tivoli Gardens is an internationally recognized amusement park and pleasure garden in Denmark.

Why was Denmark chosen as the host country for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: Danmarks Radio (DR) had won the previous contest in 1963

Denmark was selected as the host country for the 1964 contest because Danmarks Radio (DR) had won the preceding 1963 contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Elucidate the rationale behind Denmark's selection as the host nation for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Denmark was designated as the host for the 1964 contest following Danmarks Radio's (DR) victory in the 1963 competition with 'Dansevise,' performed by Grethe and Jørgen Ingmann.

Participants and Notable Entries

Sixteen countries participated in the Eurovision Song Contest 1964, with Portugal making its debut and scoring zero points.

Answer: True

Sixteen countries participated in the 1964 contest. Portugal debuted and became the first country to score nul points on its inaugural entry.

Related Concepts:

  • State the total number of countries that participated in the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.: Sixteen national broadcasters participated in the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.
  • Identify the country that debuted in the 1964 contest and describe the significant outcome of its inaugural performance.: Portugal made its inaugural appearance in the 1964 contest, becoming the first nation in Eurovision history to receive 'nul points' (zero points) on its debut entry, signifying no points from any voting jury.

Sweden was absent from the 1964 contest due to financial difficulties experienced by Sveriges Radio (SR).

Answer: False

Sweden's absence from the 1964 contest was due to a strike among members of the Swedish Union for Performing Arts and Film, not financial difficulties.

Related Concepts:

  • Which nation, a participant in 1963, was notably absent from the 1964 contest, and what was the stated reason for its non-participation?: Sweden, a participant in the 1963 contest, was absent in 1964. Sveriges Radio (SR) cited a strike by members of the Swedish Union for Performing Arts and Film as the reason for its non-participation.

Anneke Grönloh, representing the Netherlands, was the first singer of Asian descent to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest.

Answer: True

Anneke Grönloh, of Indonesian descent, was indeed the first singer of non-European ancestry to represent a country in the Eurovision Song Contest, performing for the Netherlands.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the first singer of non-European ancestry to represent a nation in the Eurovision Song Contest, and specify the country they represented.: Anneke Grönloh, of Indonesian heritage, became the first vocalist of non-European ancestry to represent a nation in the Eurovision Song Contest, performing for the Netherlands. This participation signified an early instance of increased diversity within the competition.

Los TNT, representing Spain, were the first group of three or more participants in the history of the contest.

Answer: True

The Italian-Uruguayan group Los TNT, performing for Spain, were indeed the first group of three or more participants in the contest's history.

Related Concepts:

  • Which musical ensemble achieved the distinction of being the first group comprising three or more participants in the contest's history, and which nation did they represent?: The Italian-Uruguayan ensemble Los TNT, performing under the moniker Nelly with Tim and Tony, represented Spain and were the first group of three or more participants in the contest's history.

Anita Traversi's 1964 appearance for Switzerland marked her fourth involvement in the Eurovision Song Contest.

Answer: False

Anita Traversi's 1964 appearance for Switzerland marked her *third* involvement in the contest, having previously competed in 1960 and provided backing vocals in 1956.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the performing artist who had previously represented the same nation in prior editions of the Eurovision Song Contest.: Anita Traversi, representing Switzerland, had previously competed for Switzerland in 1960 and contributed backing vocals for the nation in 1956, marking her third involvement in the contest.

Which country made its debut in the 1964 contest and achieved a notable, albeit undesirable, record?

Answer: Portugal, by scoring nul points on its debut entry

Portugal debuted in the 1964 contest and notably became the first country in Eurovision history to score nul points on its inaugural entry.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the country that debuted in the 1964 contest and describe the significant outcome of its inaugural performance.: Portugal made its inaugural appearance in the 1964 contest, becoming the first nation in Eurovision history to receive 'nul points' (zero points) on its debut entry, signifying no points from any voting jury.

What was the primary reason for Sweden's absence from the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: A strike among members of the Swedish Union for Performing Arts and Film

Sweden's non-participation in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest was primarily due to a strike involving members of the Swedish Union for Performing Arts and Film.

Related Concepts:

  • Which nation, a participant in 1963, was notably absent from the 1964 contest, and what was the stated reason for its non-participation?: Sweden, a participant in the 1963 contest, was absent in 1964. Sveriges Radio (SR) cited a strike by members of the Swedish Union for Performing Arts and Film as the reason for its non-participation.

Who was the first singer of non-European ancestry to represent a country in the Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: Anneke Grönloh for the Netherlands

Anneke Grönloh, of Indonesian descent, was the first singer of non-European ancestry to represent a country in the Eurovision Song Contest, performing for the Netherlands.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the first singer of non-European ancestry to represent a nation in the Eurovision Song Contest, and specify the country they represented.: Anneke Grönloh, of Indonesian heritage, became the first vocalist of non-European ancestry to represent a nation in the Eurovision Song Contest, performing for the Netherlands. This participation signified an early instance of increased diversity within the competition.

Which group made history as the first group of three or more participants in the contest, and for which country did they perform?

Answer: Los TNT for Spain

The Italian-Uruguayan group Los TNT, representing Spain, were the first group of three or more participants in the history of the contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Which musical ensemble achieved the distinction of being the first group comprising three or more participants in the contest's history, and which nation did they represent?: The Italian-Uruguayan ensemble Los TNT, performing under the moniker Nelly with Tim and Tony, represented Spain and were the first group of three or more participants in the contest's history.

Winning Performance and Outcomes

Gigliola Cinquetti, representing Italy with 'Non ho l'età', became the youngest winner of the contest at 16 years and 92 days old, a record she held until 1986.

Answer: True

Gigliola Cinquetti, representing Italy, won the 1964 contest at 16 years and 92 days old, establishing a record for the youngest winner that stood until 1986.

Related Concepts:

  • What historical record did Gigliola Cinquetti establish with her triumph in the 1964 contest?: At the age of 16 years and 92 days, Gigliola Cinquetti became the youngest victor in the contest's history, a distinction she maintained until 1986. This achievement underscores her precocious success in the musical domain.

Germany, Switzerland, and Yugoslavia, along with debutant Portugal, all scored nul points for the first time in the 1964 contest.

Answer: True

Germany, Switzerland, and Yugoslavia, in addition to Portugal, all received nul points for the first time in the 1964 contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond Portugal, identify other nations that received 'nul points' for the first time in the 1964 contest.: Germany, Switzerland, and Yugoslavia, in addition to debutant Portugal, each received 'nul points' for the first time in the 1964 contest.
  • List the countries that received zero points in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Germany, Portugal, Yugoslavia, and Switzerland each received 0 points in the 1964 contest.

The winning artist in 1964 received a monetary prize along with an engraved medallion.

Answer: False

The winning artist received an engraved silver medallion, but no mention of a monetary prize is provided in the source material.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the nature of the award bestowed upon the victorious artist in 1964.: The winning artist received an engraved silver medallion, symbolizing their achievement.

Gigliola Cinquetti's performance of 'Non ho l'età' was so well-received that it was immediately repeated on British television the same evening.

Answer: False

Gigliola Cinquetti's performance was given an unscheduled repeat on British television the *following afternoon*, not the same evening.

Related Concepts:

  • What distinctive recognition was accorded to Gigliola Cinquetti's performance on British television?: Gigliola Cinquetti's performance received an unscheduled repeat broadcast on British television the subsequent afternoon, underscoring its significant impact and popularity.

Italy won the 1964 contest with 49 points, while the United Kingdom secured second place with 17 points.

Answer: True

Italy won the 1964 contest with 49 points, and the United Kingdom placed second with 17 points.

Related Concepts:

  • State Italy's final score and its placement in the 1964 contest.: Italy attained a total of 49 points, thereby securing first place in the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.
  • Identify the country that secured second place in the 1964 contest and its corresponding point total.: The United Kingdom achieved second place in the 1964 contest, accumulating 17 points.

Who performed the winning song 'Non ho l'età' for Italy in the 1964 contest?

Answer: Gigliola Cinquetti

Gigliola Cinquetti performed the winning song 'Non ho l'età' for Italy in the 1964 contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the winning song and the performing artist for the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.: The winning entry of the Eurovision Song Contest 1964 was 'Non ho l'età,' performed by Gigliola Cinquetti, representing Italy.

Which of the following countries scored nul points for the first time in the 1964 contest, alongside debutant Portugal?

Answer: Germany, Switzerland, and Yugoslavia

Germany, Switzerland, and Yugoslavia, in addition to Portugal, all received nul points for the first time in the 1964 contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond Portugal, identify other nations that received 'nul points' for the first time in the 1964 contest.: Germany, Switzerland, and Yugoslavia, in addition to debutant Portugal, each received 'nul points' for the first time in the 1964 contest.
  • List the countries that received zero points in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Germany, Portugal, Yugoslavia, and Switzerland each received 0 points in the 1964 contest.

What special recognition did Gigliola Cinquetti's performance receive on British television?

Answer: It was given an unscheduled repeat the following afternoon.

Gigliola Cinquetti's performance received an unscheduled repeat broadcast on British television the subsequent afternoon.

Related Concepts:

  • What distinctive recognition was accorded to Gigliola Cinquetti's performance on British television?: Gigliola Cinquetti's performance received an unscheduled repeat broadcast on British television the subsequent afternoon, underscoring its significant impact and popularity.

Which country came in second place in the 1964 contest, and with how many points?

Answer: United Kingdom with 17 points

The United Kingdom secured second place in the 1964 contest with a total of 17 points.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the country that secured second place in the 1964 contest and its corresponding point total.: The United Kingdom achieved second place in the 1964 contest, accumulating 17 points.

Which countries tied for fourth place in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: Luxembourg and France

Luxembourg and France tied for fourth place in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest, each receiving 14 points.

Related Concepts:

  • Name the countries that shared third and fourth place in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Monaco secured third place with 15 points, whereas Luxembourg and France were tied for fourth place, each receiving 14 points.

Production, Broadcast, and Media

The 1964 contest is notable for being the only Eurovision contest for which no complete surviving video recordings are known to exist.

Answer: False

The 1964 contest is one of *two* Eurovision contests (along with 1956) for which no complete surviving video recordings are known to exist, not the only one.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the distinctive characteristic concerning the video recordings of the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: The 1964 contest is one of only two Eurovision editions, alongside the 1956 event, for which no complete video recordings are known to have survived. This absence constitutes a notable lacuna in Eurovision's historical archive.

Poul Leth Sørensen directed the 1964 contest, while Bent Fabricius Bjerre served as the musical director.

Answer: False

Poul Leth Sørensen was the director, but Kai Mortensen served as the musical director. Bent Fabricius Bjerre was a co-producer.

Related Concepts:

  • Name the director and musical director appointed for the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.: Poul Leth Sørensen held the role of director, while Kai Mortensen served as the musical director for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest. Bent Fabricius Bjerre and Marianne Drewes were credited as co-producers.

Rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest began three days before the main event.

Answer: False

Rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest commenced on March 19, 1964, which was *two* days before the main event on March 21.

Related Concepts:

  • On what date did rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest commence?: Rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest began on March 19, 1964, two days prior to the main event.

The interval act for the 1964 contest featured a ballet performance choreographed by Niels Bjørn Larsen.

Answer: True

The interval act for the 1964 contest was a ballet performance choreographed by Niels Bjørn Larsen, featuring dancers from the Royal Danish Ballet.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the interval act presented during the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: The interval act featured a ballet performance by Solveig Østergaard, Niels Kehlet, Inge Olafsen, and Mette Hønningen, members of the Royal Danish Ballet, one of the world's oldest ballet companies.
  • Identify the choreographer of the interval act's ballet performance and the musical pieces utilized.: Niels Bjørn Larsen choreographed the ballet performance, which was set to Hans Christian Lumbye's 'Columbine polka mazurka' and 'Champagne Galop'.

The estimated viewing figures for the 1964 contest were between 50 and 100 million viewers.

Answer: False

The estimated viewing figures for the 1964 contest ranged from 100 to 150 million viewers, not 50 to 100 million.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide the estimated viewing figures for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Press estimates for the 1964 contest indicated a viewership ranging from 100 to 150 million, signifying a substantial international audience.

Robert Beauvais provided commentary for both France and Monaco during the 1964 contest.

Answer: True

Robert Beauvais served as the commentator for both France and Monaco during the 1964 contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the commentator who provided coverage for both France and Monaco during the 1964 contest.: Robert Beauvais served as the commentator for both France (via RTF and Inter Jeunesse) and Monaco (via Télé Monte-Carlo) during the 1964 contest.

Sweden did not broadcast the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest due to its non-participation.

Answer: False

Despite its non-participation, Sweden did broadcast the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest, with Sven Lindahl as commentator.

Related Concepts:

  • List the non-participating countries that also broadcast the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.: Non-participating nations that broadcast the 1964 contest included Ireland, Malta, Netherlands Antilles, and Sweden, thereby extending the event's reach to a broader European audience.
  • Identify the commentator for Sweden's broadcast, notwithstanding its non-participation in the contest.: Sven Lindahl served as the commentator for Sweden's broadcast on Sveriges TV, despite the nation's non-participation in the contest that year.

The only surviving video material from the 1964 contest is the full performance of Gigliola Cinquetti's winning song.

Answer: False

Surviving video material includes the winning announcement by Svend Pedersen and *part* of Gigliola Cinquetti's reprise performance, not the full performance, and it's not the *only* surviving material (audio and photos also exist).

Related Concepts:

  • Describe any specific video clips from the 1964 contest that are known to have survived.: Fragments of the 1964 contest have survived, notably the winning announcement by Svend Pedersen and a portion of Gigliola Cinquetti's reprise performance. These extant clips provide limited visual insight into the event.

A long-standing rumor about the missing video tape of the 1964 contest was that it was destroyed in a fire in the 1970s, which was later confirmed to be false.

Answer: True

A persistent rumor claimed the tape was destroyed in a 1970s fire, but this was later disproven, with DR stating the broadcast was never recorded due to a lack of tape machines.

Related Concepts:

  • Discuss the persistent rumor regarding the missing video tape of the 1964 contest and its subsequently confirmed status.: A pervasive myth, even propagated on the official Eurovision website, asserted that the master tape was destroyed in a 1970s fire. However, in 2021, the French television archives (INA) confirmed the absence of a video copy, and in 2019, DR stated that the broadcast was never recorded due to a scarcity of tape machines.

While no complete video recording exists, the audio of most of the 1964 show is still available online.

Answer: True

Despite the absence of a complete video recording, the audio of most of the 1964 show remains accessible online.

Related Concepts:

  • Is there any extant audio or visual material from the 1964 contest available presently?: Although a complete video recording is absent, the majority of the show's audio is accessible online, supplemented by short video clips and photographic documentation from various archives, enabling partial historical reconstruction of the event.

What is unique about the video recordings of the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: It is one of only two contests for which no complete surviving video recordings are known to exist.

The 1964 Eurovision Song Contest is unique as it is one of only two contests for which no complete surviving video recordings are known to exist.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the distinctive characteristic concerning the video recordings of the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: The 1964 contest is one of only two Eurovision editions, alongside the 1956 event, for which no complete video recordings are known to have survived. This absence constitutes a notable lacuna in Eurovision's historical archive.

Who served as the musical director for the Eurovision Song Contest 1964?

Answer: Kai Mortensen

Kai Mortensen served as the musical director for the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.

Related Concepts:

  • Name the director and musical director appointed for the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.: Poul Leth Sørensen held the role of director, while Kai Mortensen served as the musical director for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest. Bent Fabricius Bjerre and Marianne Drewes were credited as co-producers.

Approximately how many journalists and photographers covered the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: Approximately 100

Approximately 100 journalists and photographers were accredited to cover the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Quantify the number of journalists and photographers who provided coverage for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Approximately 100 journalists and photographers were accredited to cover the event, reflecting substantial media interest in the contest.

When did rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest begin?

Answer: March 19, 1964

Rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest commenced on March 19, 1964.

Related Concepts:

  • On what date did rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest commence?: Rehearsals for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest began on March 19, 1964, two days prior to the main event.

What was the role of non-participating EBU member broadcasters in the contest?

Answer: They could relay the contest as 'passive participants'.

Non-participating EBU member broadcasters were permitted to relay the contest as 'passive participants,' enabling them to broadcast the event without submitting an entry.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the function of non-participating EBU member broadcasters concerning the contest.: Non-participating EBU member broadcasters were permitted to relay the contest as 'passive participants,' enabling them to broadcast the event without submitting an entry.

What were the estimated viewing figures for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: 100 to 150 million viewers

Press estimates for the 1964 contest indicated a viewership ranging from 100 to 150 million viewers.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide the estimated viewing figures for the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Press estimates for the 1964 contest indicated a viewership ranging from 100 to 150 million, signifying a substantial international audience.

Who was the commentator for Denmark's broadcast of the 1964 contest?

Answer: Claus Walter

Claus Walter served as the commentator for Denmark's broadcast of the 1964 contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the commentator for Denmark's broadcast of the 1964 contest.: Claus Walter served as the commentator for Denmark's broadcast of the 1964 contest across DR TV, DR P1, and DR P3.

Which non-participating country also broadcast the Eurovision Song Contest 1964?

Answer: Sweden

Sweden was among the non-participating countries that also broadcast the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.

Related Concepts:

  • List the non-participating countries that also broadcast the Eurovision Song Contest 1964.: Non-participating nations that broadcast the 1964 contest included Ireland, Malta, Netherlands Antilles, and Sweden, thereby extending the event's reach to a broader European audience.

What specific clips of the 1964 contest are known to have survived?

Answer: The winning announcement by Svend Pedersen and part of Gigliola Cinquetti's reprise performance.

Surviving video clips from the 1964 contest include the winning announcement by Svend Pedersen and a portion of Gigliola Cinquetti's reprise performance.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe any specific video clips from the 1964 contest that are known to have survived.: Fragments of the 1964 contest have survived, notably the winning announcement by Svend Pedersen and a portion of Gigliola Cinquetti's reprise performance. These extant clips provide limited visual insight into the event.

What was the actual status of the missing video tape of the 1964 contest, according to later confirmations?

Answer: DR claimed the broadcast was never recorded due to a lack of tape machines.

Later confirmations revealed that Danmarks Radio (DR) claimed the 1964 broadcast was never recorded due to a lack of available tape machines, dispelling earlier rumors.

Related Concepts:

  • Discuss the persistent rumor regarding the missing video tape of the 1964 contest and its subsequently confirmed status.: A pervasive myth, even propagated on the official Eurovision website, asserted that the master tape was destroyed in a 1970s fire. However, in 2021, the French television archives (INA) confirmed the absence of a video copy, and in 2019, DR stated that the broadcast was never recorded due to a scarcity of tape machines.

Controversies and Incidents

A political protest occurred during the 1964 contest when a man held a banner against the authoritarian regimes in Spain and Portugal.

Answer: True

A political protest did occur during the 1964 contest, with a man displaying a banner against the authoritarian regimes in Spain and Portugal.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the significant political protest that transpired during the 1964 contest.: Following the Swiss entry, an individual trespassed onto the stage displaying a banner inscribed 'Boycot Franco & Salazar,' constituting a political protest against the authoritarian regimes then in power in Spain and Portugal.

During the political protest, television viewers were shown a close-up of the protester before he was removed from the stage.

Answer: False

During the political protest, television viewers were shown a shot of the scoreboard, effectively cutting away from the live stage incident, rather than a close-up of the protester.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the television broadcast's response to the political protest during the contest.: In response to the political protest, the television broadcast momentarily shifted to a shot of the scoreboard, thereby obscuring the live stage incident from viewers. Upon the protester's removal by a television technician, the contest proceeded.

How did the television broadcast handle the political protest during the contest?

Answer: Television viewers were shown a shot of the scoreboard.

During the political protest, the television broadcast momentarily shifted to a shot of the scoreboard, thereby obscuring the live stage incident from viewers.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the television broadcast's response to the political protest during the contest.: In response to the political protest, the television broadcast momentarily shifted to a shot of the scoreboard, thereby obscuring the live stage incident from viewers. Upon the protester's removal by a television technician, the contest proceeded.

Voting Mechanics and Scoring

The voting system in 1964 allowed each 10-member jury panel to award points to their top five favorite songs.

Answer: False

The voting system in 1964 allowed each 10-member jury panel to distribute three points among their top *one, two, or three* favorite songs, not five.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the voting system employed by the jury panels in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Each participating broadcaster constituted a 10-member jury panel, which allocated three points among their top one, two, or three preferred songs. These points were then aggregated, with the first, second, and third-placed songs receiving 5, 3, and 1 votes, respectively. In cases where only one song was selected, it garnered all 9 points; if two were chosen, they received 6 and 3 points.

Italy received 5 points from eight different nations in the 1964 contest.

Answer: True

Italy received 5 points from Austria, Belgium, Finland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom, and Yugoslavia, totaling eight nations.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the nations that awarded 5 points to Italy in the 1964 contest.: Italy was awarded 5 points by Austria, Belgium, Finland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom, and Yugoslavia.

What was the voting system used by the jury panels in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest?

Answer: Each jury awarded 5, 3, and 1 points to their top three songs after an initial distribution of 3 points among favorites.

The voting system involved a 10-member jury panel from each broadcaster distributing three points among their top one, two, or three favorite songs. Subsequently, the first, second, and third-placed songs received 5, 3, and 1 points, respectively.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the voting system employed by the jury panels in the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest.: Each participating broadcaster constituted a 10-member jury panel, which allocated three points among their top one, two, or three preferred songs. These points were then aggregated, with the first, second, and third-placed songs receiving 5, 3, and 1 votes, respectively. In cases where only one song was selected, it garnered all 9 points; if two were chosen, they received 6 and 3 points.

Which of the following nations awarded 5 points to Italy in the 1964 contest?

Answer: Austria, Belgium, and Finland

Austria, Belgium, and Finland were among the eight nations that awarded 5 points to Italy in the 1964 contest.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the nations that awarded 5 points to Italy in the 1964 contest.: Italy was awarded 5 points by Austria, Belgium, Finland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom, and Yugoslavia.

Venue and Historical Context

Tivoli Gardens, the location of the 1964 venue, is the oldest amusement park in the world, predating Dyrehavsbakken.

Answer: False

Tivoli Gardens is the *second* oldest amusement park in the world, following Dyrehavsbakken.

Related Concepts:

  • Discuss the historical importance of Tivoli Gardens, the site of the 1964 Eurovision Song Contest venue.: Tivoli Gardens, inaugurated on August 15, 1843, holds the distinction of being the world's second-oldest amusement park, preceded only by Dyrehavsbakken in Klampenborg. Its nomenclature references the former Jardin de Tivoli in Paris.

Post-Event Recognition and Aftermath

Each of the 16 participating acts received a silver trophy at the aftershow party held at the restaurant Ambassadeur.

Answer: True

At the aftershow party held at the restaurant Ambassadeur in Copenhagen, each of the 16 participating acts was awarded a silver trophy.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the post-contest event for participating delegations and the awards distributed.: An aftershow reception was hosted for the participating delegations at the Ambassadeur restaurant in Copenhagen, where each of the sixteen competing acts received a silver trophy.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy