Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
By the early twentieth century, flour sacks were often made from coarse burlap and featured only plain labels.
Answer: False
The source indicates that by the early 20th century, flour sacks were increasingly made from fabrics with a tighter weave, such as percale and sheeting, and were often printed with decorative designs.
Flour millers initially resisted the reuse of sacks, viewing it as a loss of business.
Answer: False
Rather than resisting reuse, flour millers adapted by producing sacks with attractive patterns and colors to encourage repurposing, recognizing it as a way to maintain customer engagement and sales.
When did the use of fabric sacks for transporting grain first emerge?
Answer: In the early 19th century.
The initial use of fabric sacks for transporting grain can be traced back to the early 19th century, predating their widespread use for clothing.
What technological advancements contributed to the shift from barrels to sacks for commodity packaging in the mid-19th century?
Answer: The invention of the sewing machine and improvements in spinning/weaving.
Technological advancements, particularly the invention of the sewing machine and improvements in spinning and weaving, made packaging commodities in sacks more cost-effective than using barrels by the mid-19th century.
What material was typically used for the first commercially produced feed sacks in the late 1800s?
Answer: Coarse cotton, known as osnaburg.
The earliest commercially produced feed sacks, appearing in the late 1800s, were typically made from osnaburg, a coarse type of cotton, or sometimes burlap.
How did the size of early commercial feed sacks relate to traditional barrel sizes?
Answer: They were created to hold fractions of the traditional 196-pound barrel weight.
A traditional barrel held 196 pounds of flour; early commercial feed sacks were designed to contain fractions of this standard weight, offering smaller, more manageable quantities.
Before being widely used for clothing, how did farmers initially repurpose feed sacks?
Answer: As toweling, rags, or for other practical farm needs.
Farmers initially recycled osnaburg sacks for various functional purposes on the farm, such as toweling, rags, or other practical needs, well before their widespread adoption for clothing.
Feed sack dresses were predominantly constructed from burlap fabric.
Answer: False
The source material indicates that feed sack dresses were typically made from cotton sacks, not burlap.
The practice of repurposing commodity sacks for clothing originated in the early twentieth century.
Answer: False
While commodity sacks were repurposed for functional uses earlier, the creation of clothing from these sacks became a distinctive feature of rural life starting in the 1920s, suggesting its widespread adoption as clothing material was not prior to this period.
During World War II, feed sacks became scarce because textile manufacturers prioritized them for military uniforms.
Answer: False
Contrary to the statement, dressmaking-quality fabrics became scarce during World War II due to production shifts for the war effort, while feed sacks remained available and were even encouraged for use.
Feed sacks gained popularity during the Great Depression because they were a source of free garment-making material.
Answer: True
The economic hardship of the Great Depression made feed sacks highly valuable as a source of free fabric, enabling families to create clothing when purchasing new textiles was unaffordable.
During World War II, it was estimated that fewer than 1 million people in the US wore clothing made from feed sacks.
Answer: False
Estimates suggest that approximately 3 million women and children in the United States wore clothing made from feed sacks during World War II, indicating a much higher prevalence.
During World War II, using feed sacks for clothing was discouraged as it diverted resources needed for the war effort.
Answer: False
On the contrary, using feed sacks during World War II was encouraged as a thrifty and patriotic practice that conserved resources and helped meet clothing needs when commercial fabrics were scarce.
What were feed sack dresses primarily made from?
Answer: Cotton sacks that originally contained commodities like flour, sugar, or seeds.
Feed sack dresses were typically constructed from the cotton sacks that had previously held commodities such as flour, sugar, animal feed, or seeds.
In which regions were feed sack dresses most common?
Answer: In rural communities across the United States and Canada.
Feed sack dresses were a distinctive feature of rural life, most commonly found in communities across the United States and Canada.
How did World War II affect the availability of fabric for clothing?
Answer: Commercial dressmaking fabrics became scarce, but feed sacks remained available.
During World War II, commercial dressmaking fabrics grew scarce as production shifted to war efforts, but feed sacks remained accessible and were encouraged for home sewing.
Why did feed sacks become particularly popular during the Great Depression?
Answer: They provided a source of free garment-making material for families facing hardship.
During the Great Depression, feed sacks were highly valued as a source of free fabric, enabling families facing economic hardship to create necessary clothing.
What was the estimated number of women and children wearing feed sack clothing during World War II?
Answer: Roughly 3 million.
It was estimated that approximately 3 million women and children in the United States wore clothing made from feed sacks during the period of World War II.
Asa T. Bales patented a design for a sack specifically intended for repurposing into dress goods in 1924.
Answer: True
Asa T. Bales secured a patent in October 1924 for a sack designed specifically for repurposing into dress goods, marking a significant development in the use of commodity sacks for apparel.
The George P. Plant Milling Company began using plain, unprinted sacks for its flour in 1925.
Answer: False
In 1925, the George P. Plant Milling Company introduced 'Gingham Girl' flour sacks made of dress-quality, checked fabric, actively promoting their reuse, rather than using plain, unprinted sacks.
The Household Science Institute produced a newsletter called 'Out of the Bag'.
Answer: True
The Household Science Institute was indeed a source of educational materials, producing a newsletter titled 'Out of the Bag' to guide women in repurposing feed sacks.
By the 1930s, feed sacks were primarily marketed for their durability in industrial applications, not for home sewing.
Answer: False
By the 1930s, companies recognized feed sacks as valuable marketing tools, actively promoting them with attractive designs and colors specifically to appeal to consumers for home sewing and apparel.
The availability of decorative feed sacks shifted purchasing decisions away from the farmwife towards the farmer.
Answer: False
The availability of decorative feed sacks actually shifted purchasing decisions towards the farmwife, as consumers began choosing brands based on the appeal of the sack patterns.
Flour sack manufacturers began producing sacks with less attractive patterns after the Great Depression to cut costs.
Answer: False
Manufacturers actually began producing sacks with more attractive patterns and colors after the Great Depression to encourage reuse and appeal to consumers, rather than cutting costs with less attractive designs.
Magazines and newspapers played a minor role in promoting feed sack sewing by only occasionally featuring patterns.
Answer: False
Magazines and newspapers played a crucial role in promoting feed sack sewing by widely disseminating patterns and instructions, significantly popularizing the practice among farm families.
Feed sack fashion primarily reflected the influence of European haute couture on rural communities.
Answer: False
Studies indicate that feed sack fashions mirrored contemporary styles found in mainstream magazines, rather than being primarily influenced by European haute couture.
What was the primary significance of Asa T. Bales' patent in 1924?
Answer: It designed a sack specifically intended for repurposing into dress goods.
Asa T. Bales' 1924 patent was for a sack specifically designed to be repurposed for dress goods, marking a key innovation that facilitated the use of feed sacks for clothing.
Which industry association collaborated with the Millers National Federation to promote feed sack sewing projects?
Answer: The Textile Bag Manufacturers Association.
The Textile Bag Manufacturers Association, established in 1925, collaborated with the Millers National Federation to actively promote home sewing projects utilizing feed sacks.
What change occurred in the appearance of flour sacks by the early 20th century?
Answer: They featured tighter weaves like percale and sheeting, often printed with designs.
By the early 20th century, flour sacks increasingly utilized tighter weaves like percale and sheeting, and were often printed with a variety of colors and decorative designs, enhancing their appeal for reuse.
What was significant about the 'Gingham Girl' flour sacks introduced in 1925?
Answer: They used sacks made of dress-quality, checked fabric, promoted for reuse.
The 'Gingham Girl' flour sacks, introduced in 1925, were significant for using dress-quality, checked fabric and being actively promoted for their potential reuse in home sewing.
Which publication provided educational resources and guidance on using feed sacks for sewing?
Answer: Sewing with Cotton Bags booklets
Publications such as the 'Sewing with Cotton Bags' booklets, produced by entities like the Household Science Institute, offered essential instructions and guidance for repurposing feed sacks.
How did flour millers adapt their sack production during the Great Depression to encourage reuse?
Answer: They began producing sacks with attractive patterns and colors.
Flour millers adapted by producing sacks with increasingly attractive patterns and colors, transforming the sacks into a selling point and encouraging their reuse for clothing and household items.
How did the appeal of decorative feed sacks influence purchasing decisions?
Answer: Store owners noted customers asking for specific brands based on sack patterns.
The aesthetic appeal of decorative feed sacks influenced purchasing decisions, with store owners observing customers requesting specific brands based on the patterns of the sacks.
According to fashion historian Jennifer Lynn Banning, how did feed sack fashions compare to mainstream styles?
Answer: They mirrored contemporary styles found in mainstream magazines.
Fashion historian Jennifer Lynn Banning's research indicates that garments made from feed sacks often mirrored contemporary styles featured in mainstream fashion magazines, demonstrating an adaptation of current trends.
A 100-pound feed sack typically yielded approximately 1 foot (30 cm) of cloth.
Answer: False
The source indicates that a 100-pound feed sack yielded slightly more than 1 yard (91 cm) of material, not merely 1 foot.
A major challenge for women making feed sack garments was the difficulty in removing printed logos.
Answer: False
While removing logos was a necessary step, the primary challenge for women was often finding enough sacks with matching patterns for a particular garment, rather than the difficulty of logo removal itself.
Using feed sacks for clothing was generally more expensive than purchasing fabric from catalogs.
Answer: False
Using salvaged feed sacks was significantly more cost-effective than purchasing comparable fabric from catalogs, especially during periods of economic hardship.
Early methods for removing feed sack logos involved using bleach and hot water.
Answer: False
Early methods for removing logos included soaking the inked areas in lard or kerosene; later methods utilized water-soluble ink or paper labels.
Fashion historian Kendra Brandes argued that fashion history often overlooked rural communities, creating a 'top-rail bias'.
Answer: True
Historian Kendra Brandes highlighted the 'top-rail bias' in fashion history, which tends to focus on elite styles and neglect the significant cultural practices of rural communities, such as the use of feed sacks.
Wearing feed sack clothing carried a social stigma because it was associated with wealth and high fashion.
Answer: False
The social stigma associated with feed sack clothing stemmed from its perception as a marker of poverty, not wealth or high fashion. Women often took steps to disguise the origin of the fabric.
Besides dresses, feed sacks were commonly used to make items like curtains, quilts, and cleaning rags.
Answer: True
Farm women creatively repurposed feed sacks into a wide array of household necessities, including underwear, towels, curtains, quilts, rugs, and cleaning rags, demonstrating the fabric's versatility.
'Chicken linen' is an alternative name used for feed sack fabric.
Answer: True
The fabric and bags made from commodity sacks have been referred to by various names, including the colloquial term 'chicken linen'.
A 1951 USDA report indicated that awareness of making garments from feed sacks was low, especially in urban areas.
Answer: False
A 1951 USDA report found high awareness of making garments from feed sacks, with 75% of mothers in urban areas and 97% in rural areas having heard of the practice.
The 'top-rail bias' in fashion history refers to the focus on practical, everyday clothing for working-class individuals.
Answer: False
The 'top-rail bias' in fashion history refers to the tendency to prioritize styles and designers catering to the upper classes, often neglecting the fashion practices of rural or lower-income communities.
The Smithsonian highlights farm women's use of feed sacks as an example of prioritizing convenience over creativity.
Answer: False
The Smithsonian highlights farm women's use of feed sacks as an example of elevating thriftiness to new heights of creativity and resourcefulness, not prioritizing convenience over it.
Approximately how much fabric could be obtained from a 100-pound feed sack?
Answer: Slightly more than 1 yard (91 cm).
A 100-pound feed sack typically yielded slightly more than 1 yard (91 cm) of usable fabric, with smaller sacks providing proportionally less.
What was a significant challenge faced by women creating garments from feed sacks?
Answer: Difficulty in finding enough sacks with matching patterns.
A significant challenge for women making feed sack garments was acquiring sufficient sacks with matching patterns to complete a particular clothing design.
What was the estimated cost savings of using feed sacks compared to buying fabric, based on the example provided?
Answer: Fabric from sacks was significantly cheaper than catalog fabric.
Using salvaged feed sacks offered substantial cost savings, being significantly cheaper than purchasing comparable fabric from catalogs, particularly during economic downturns.
What methods were used to remove logos or identifying marks from feed sacks?
Answer: Early methods included lard or kerosene; later methods used water-soluble ink or paper labels.
Methods for removing logos evolved from using lard or kerosene in earlier periods to employing water-soluble ink or paper labels in later years, facilitating the preparation of sacks for garment making.
Why did women sometimes take steps to disguise the origin of feed sack fabric?
Answer: To mitigate the social stigma associated with wearing clothing perceived as poor.
Women often took measures to disguise the origin of feed sack fabric, such as soaking off logos or adding decorative trim, to counteract the social stigma associated with clothing made from repurposed materials perceived as humble.
Besides dresses, what other common household items were made from feed sacks?
Answer: Underwear, towels, curtains, and quilts.
Beyond dresses, feed sacks were creatively transformed into a variety of household items, including underwear, towels, curtains, quilts, and rugs, showcasing their versatility.
What does the 'top-rail bias' mentioned by historian Kendra Brandes refer to?
Answer: The focus in fashion history on upper-class styles, neglecting rural practices.
The 'top-rail bias' describes fashion history's tendency to concentrate on elite styles, thereby overlooking the significant fashion practices and cultural contributions of rural communities.
The decline in cloth feed sack usage after World War II was primarily attributed to the development of durable plastic packaging.
Answer: False
The primary reason for the decline in cloth feed sack usage was the shift towards less expensive paper packaging, not plastic.
After World War II, industry associations stopped promoting feed sacks because paper packaging had completely replaced them.
Answer: False
Industry associations continued to promote feed sacks after World War II, collaborating with pattern companies and designers, even as paper packaging gained prominence.
The industry attempted to sustain demand for feed sacks after WWII mainly by lowering prices.
Answer: False
Post-WWII efforts to sustain demand for feed sacks focused on collaborations with pattern companies, sponsoring competitions, and hiring designers to create appealing prints, rather than solely on price reductions.
What was the primary reason for the decline in the use of cloth feed sacks after World War II?
Answer: A shift towards less expensive paper packaging.
The primary factor contributing to the decline of cloth feed sacks after World War II was the increasing adoption of less expensive and more convenient paper packaging by manufacturers.
By what time period had the production of most feed sacks ceased almost entirely?
Answer: By the early 1960s.
The production of most cloth feed sacks gradually declined after World War II, ceasing almost entirely by the early 1960s as paper packaging became dominant.
How did the industry attempt to sustain demand for feed sacks after World War II?
Answer: By collaborating with pattern companies, sponsoring competitions, and hiring designers.
Post-World War II, industry associations collaborated with pattern companies, sponsored design competitions, and hired designers to create appealing prints, aiming to sustain demand for feed sacks against competing packaging materials.
What percentage of US cotton goods production did commodity bags account for in 1946?
Answer: 8.0%.
In 1946, commodity bags represented a significant 8.0% of the total US cotton goods production, illustrating the peak scale of this industry.