Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


Military Incidents: Fragging and Insider Attacks

At a Glance

Title: Military Incidents: Fragging and Insider Attacks

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • 1. Understanding Fragging: 4 flashcards, 7 questions
  • 2. Fragging in the Vietnam War: 11 flashcards, 17 questions
  • 3. Scale and Consequences of Fragging: 4 flashcards, 7 questions
  • 4. Military Response and Ineffectiveness: 4 flashcards, 7 questions
  • 5. Historical and Contemporary Parallels: 4 flashcards, 5 questions
  • 6. Specific Documented Cases: 14 flashcards, 15 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 41
  • True/False Questions: 29
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 29
  • Total Questions: 58

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Military Incidents: Fragging and Insider Attacks

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Fragging" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Military Incidents: Fragging and Insider Attacks

Study Guide: Military Incidents: Fragging and Insider Attacks

1. Understanding Fragging

Fragging is defined as any accidental discharge of a weapon by a friendly soldier during combat operations.

Answer: False

Fragging is characterized by deliberate acts of violence against fellow soldiers or superiors, distinguishing it fundamentally from 'friendly fire,' which involves unintentional harm to allied personnel during combat operations.

Related Concepts:

  • How does fragging differ from "friendly fire" incidents?: Fragging is a deliberate act of violence by a soldier against their comrades or superiors. In contrast, friendly fire refers to the unintentional killing or wounding of allied personnel by their own side's weapons during combat operations.
  • What is the definition of "fragging" in a military context?: Fragging refers to the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, typically by a fellow soldier, often targeting a superior officer. It is a serious breach of military discipline and conduct.
  • Has the definition of "fragging" evolved since the Vietnam War?: Yes, while initially associated with the use of fragmentation grenades, the term "fragging" now encompasses any deliberate killing of military colleagues, regardless of the weapon used.

The term "fragging" originated during World War II, linked to the use of fragmentation grenades.

Answer: False

The term "fragging" originated during the Vietnam War, associated with the use of fragmentation grenades in attacks.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the term "fragging" originate, and what was its initial association?: The term "fragging" was coined by U.S. military personnel during the Vietnam War. Its origin is linked to the use of fragmentation grenades, which were often employed in these attacks to make the killings appear accidental or the result of enemy action.
  • Has the definition of "fragging" evolved since the Vietnam War?: Yes, while initially associated with the use of fragmentation grenades, the term "fragging" now encompasses any deliberate killing of military colleagues, regardless of the weapon used.

The definition of fragging has remained unchanged since its initial association with fragmentation grenades.

Answer: False

While initially linked to fragmentation grenades, the definition of fragging has evolved to encompass any deliberate killing of military colleagues, irrespective of the weapon used.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the definition of "fragging" in a military context?: Fragging refers to the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, typically by a fellow soldier, often targeting a superior officer. It is a serious breach of military discipline and conduct.
  • How does fragging differ from "friendly fire" incidents?: Fragging is a deliberate act of violence by a soldier against their comrades or superiors. In contrast, friendly fire refers to the unintentional killing or wounding of allied personnel by their own side's weapons during combat operations.
  • Has the definition of "fragging" evolved since the Vietnam War?: Yes, while initially associated with the use of fragmentation grenades, the term "fragging" now encompasses any deliberate killing of military colleagues, regardless of the weapon used.

Friendly fire incidents involve intentional acts of violence by soldiers against their own comrades.

Answer: False

Friendly fire incidents are characterized by unintentional harm to allied personnel, whereas fragging involves deliberate acts of violence by soldiers against their own side.

Related Concepts:

  • How does fragging differ from "friendly fire" incidents?: Fragging is a deliberate act of violence by a soldier against their comrades or superiors. In contrast, friendly fire refers to the unintentional killing or wounding of allied personnel by their own side's weapons during combat operations.

What is the primary definition of "fragging" as described in the source?

Answer: The deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, often by a fellow soldier targeting a superior officer.

The source material defines fragging as the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, frequently perpetrated by a fellow soldier against a superior officer. This distinguishes it from unintentional friendly fire incidents.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the term "fragging" originate, and what was its initial association?: The term "fragging" was coined by U.S. military personnel during the Vietnam War. Its origin is linked to the use of fragmentation grenades, which were often employed in these attacks to make the killings appear accidental or the result of enemy action.

How did the term "fragging" initially get its name?

Answer: It originated from the use of fragmentation grenades in attacks.

The term "fragging" originated during the Vietnam War and is linked to the use of fragmentation grenades, which were often employed in these attacks to obscure their deliberate nature.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the term "fragging" originate, and what was its initial association?: The term "fragging" was coined by U.S. military personnel during the Vietnam War. Its origin is linked to the use of fragmentation grenades, which were often employed in these attacks to make the killings appear accidental or the result of enemy action.

Which of the following best distinguishes fragging from friendly fire?

Answer: Fragging is intentional violence by a soldier against their own side; friendly fire is unintentional.

The fundamental distinction lies in intent: fragging is deliberate violence against fellow soldiers, whereas friendly fire is unintentional harm inflicted upon allied personnel during combat.

Related Concepts:

  • How does fragging differ from "friendly fire" incidents?: Fragging is a deliberate act of violence by a soldier against their comrades or superiors. In contrast, friendly fire refers to the unintentional killing or wounding of allied personnel by their own side's weapons during combat operations.
  • What is the definition of "fragging" in a military context?: Fragging refers to the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, typically by a fellow soldier, often targeting a superior officer. It is a serious breach of military discipline and conduct.

2. Fragging in the Vietnam War

A high number of fragging incidents in the early years of the Vietnam War indicated a period of strong military discipline and morale.

Answer: False

A high incidence of fragging, particularly in the later years of the Vietnam War, signified a breakdown of discipline and widespread discontent among some troops, not strong morale.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What societal issues present in the U.S. were also reflected within the military and potentially contributed to fragging?: Societal issues such as racism, widespread drug abuse, and resentment towards authoritarian leaders, which were prevalent in the United States at the time, were also reflected within the military and may have contributed to fragging incidents.

The increasing unpopularity of the Vietnam War was a minor factor contributing to the rise of fragging.

Answer: False

The increasing unpopularity of the Vietnam War was a significant factor contributing to the rise of fragging, as it eroded morale and purpose among soldiers.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.

The Tet Offensive led to a decrease in fragging incidents as soldiers felt a renewed sense of purpose.

Answer: False

The Tet Offensive is associated with an increase in fragging incidents, as it contributed to the war's growing unpopularity and a decline in soldier morale.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.

Racial tensions between white and black soldiers did not play a significant role in fragging incidents during the Vietnam War.

Answer: False

Racial tensions between soldiers were a significant factor that contributed to the overall discontent and fragging incidents during the Vietnam War.

Related Concepts:

  • What role did racial tensions play in the context of fragging during the Vietnam War?: Racial tensions between white and black soldiers and marines escalated, particularly after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. in April 1968. This heightened tension contributed to the overall discontent that fueled fragging incidents.
  • What societal issues present in the U.S. were also reflected within the military and potentially contributed to fragging?: Societal issues such as racism, widespread drug abuse, and resentment towards authoritarian leaders, which were prevalent in the United States at the time, were also reflected within the military and may have contributed to fragging incidents.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Some enlisted men viewed fragging as a tactic to prevent superiors from ordering risky combat operations they believed were futile.

Answer: True

Enlisted men sometimes perceived fragging as the most effective method to dissuade superiors from ordering combat operations deemed futile or excessively risky.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • What is the definition of "fragging" in a military context?: Fragging refers to the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, typically by a fellow soldier, often targeting a superior officer. It is a serious breach of military discipline and conduct.

The U.S. military's withdrawal from Vietnam improved morale and discipline, significantly reducing fragging incidents.

Answer: False

As U.S. forces withdrew, a loss of purpose and deteriorating morale contributed to fragging incidents, rather than an improvement in discipline.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What was the connection between the breakdown of discipline, including fragging, and the U.S. military's structure?: The breakdown of discipline, exemplified by fragging, was a significant factor that influenced the U.S. military's decision to transition to an all-volunteer force, thereby ending the military draft system. This shift aimed to moderate coercive discipline methods.

A primary motivation for enlisted men to frag superiors was the fear of being assigned to officers employing overly aggressive tactics, known as "John Wayne tactics."

Answer: True

Enlisted men often feared officers who employed risky, glory-seeking tactics ('John Wayne tactics'), and this fear was a significant motivation for fragging.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary motivation for enlisted men to frag their superiors, as described in the text?: Enlisted men often feared being assigned to aggressive officers who might employ risky tactics, sometimes referred to as "John Wayne tactics," in an effort to win the war single-handedly for personal glory, potentially leading to unnecessary deaths.
  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?: Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents. This indicates that abuse of power by leaders could lead to violent retaliation from their troops.

Harassment of subordinates by superiors was never cited as a motive for fragging incidents.

Answer: False

Harassment of subordinates by superiors was frequently cited as a motive for fragging incidents, indicating abuse of power as a contributing factor.

Related Concepts:

  • Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?: Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents. This indicates that abuse of power by leaders could lead to violent retaliation from their troops.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • What is the definition of "fragging" in a military context?: Fragging refers to the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, typically by a fellow soldier, often targeting a superior officer. It is a serious breach of military discipline and conduct.

Racism between soldiers was a minor factor and rarely contributed to fragging incidents.

Answer: False

Racism between soldiers was a significant factor contributing to fragging incidents, particularly escalating after events like the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

Related Concepts:

  • What role did racism play as a motive for fragging?: Racism between soldiers was a significant factor, with several fragging incidents reportedly resulting from racial tensions between black and white soldiers.
  • What role did racial tensions play in the context of fragging during the Vietnam War?: Racial tensions between white and black soldiers and marines escalated, particularly after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. in April 1968. This heightened tension contributed to the overall discontent that fueled fragging incidents.
  • What societal issues present in the U.S. were also reflected within the military and potentially contributed to fragging?: Societal issues such as racism, widespread drug abuse, and resentment towards authoritarian leaders, which were prevalent in the United States at the time, were also reflected within the military and may have contributed to fragging incidents.

Soldiers sometimes used non-lethal smoke grenades as a warning before resorting to lethal fragging.

Answer: True

Non-lethal smoke and tear-gas grenades were sometimes employed by soldiers as a warning to superiors before more lethal actions were taken.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • What non-lethal methods were sometimes used as warnings before fragging?: Soldiers sometimes used non-lethal smoke and tear-gas grenades to warn superiors to change their behavior. This served as an indication of potential danger if their actions continued, preceding more lethal actions.
  • Why were the military's responses to fragging often ineffective in reducing incidents?: These measures were often ineffective because soldiers could easily obtain weapons through a flourishing black market. Furthermore, it was challenging for investigators to definitively distinguish between fragging and enemy action, as a grenade thrown into a tent could be attributed to either.

According to the text, what did the high number of fragging incidents in the later Vietnam War years signify?

Answer: A significant breakdown of discipline and widespread discontent among some troops.

The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).

Which of these was identified as a primary factor contributing to the rise of fragging during the Vietnam War?

Answer: Troops' reluctance to risk their lives in a perceived lost cause and deteriorating morale.

Key factors contributing to the rise of fragging included the increasing unpopularity of the war, troops' reluctance to risk their lives in a perceived lost cause, and a general deterioration of morale and discipline.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • What societal issues present in the U.S. were also reflected within the military and potentially contributed to fragging?: Societal issues such as racism, widespread drug abuse, and resentment towards authoritarian leaders, which were prevalent in the United States at the time, were also reflected within the military and may have contributed to fragging incidents.

How did the Tet Offensive influence fragging incidents?

Answer: It catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents as the war became more unpopular.

The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents, as it contributed to the war's growing unpopularity among soldiers.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).

What societal issue, prevalent in the U.S. during the Vietnam era, was also reflected within the military and contributed to fragging?

Answer: Racial tensions and widespread drug abuse.

Societal issues such as racism and widespread drug abuse, prevalent in the U.S. during the Vietnam era, were also reflected within the military and contributed to fragging incidents.

Related Concepts:

  • What societal issues present in the U.S. were also reflected within the military and potentially contributed to fragging?: Societal issues such as racism, widespread drug abuse, and resentment towards authoritarian leaders, which were prevalent in the United States at the time, were also reflected within the military and may have contributed to fragging incidents.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.

Why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic against their superiors?

Answer: It was seen as the most effective way to discourage superiors from ordering risky combat operations.

With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?: Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents. This indicates that abuse of power by leaders could lead to violent retaliation from their troops.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

What specific type of officer behavior did enlisted men often fear, potentially leading to fragging?

Answer: Officers who employed risky tactics ('John Wayne tactics') for personal glory.

Enlisted men often feared officers who employed risky, glory-seeking tactics, sometimes referred to as 'John Wayne tactics,' which could lead to unnecessary deaths and potentially trigger fragging.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?: Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents. This indicates that abuse of power by leaders could lead to violent retaliation from their troops.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?

Answer: Harassment of subordinates by superiors.

Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents, indicating that abuse of power could lead to violent retaliation.

Related Concepts:

  • Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?: Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents. This indicates that abuse of power by leaders could lead to violent retaliation from their troops.
  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

3. Scale and Consequences of Fragging

According to George Lepre, nearly 900 fragging incidents involving explosives occurred between 1969 and 1972, resulting in 99 confirmed deaths.

Answer: True

Author George Lepre documented nearly 900 known and suspected fragging cases involving explosives between 1969 and 1972, which resulted in 99 confirmed deaths and numerous injuries.

Related Concepts:

  • According to George Lepre, what was the total number of known and suspected fragging cases using explosives in Vietnam between 1969 and 1972?: According to author George Lepre, the total number of known and suspected fragging cases involving explosives from 1969 to 1972 was nearly 900. These incidents resulted in 99 confirmed deaths and numerous injuries.

Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated fewer than 500 fragging incidents occurred in Vietnam.

Answer: False

Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred, resulting in 86 deaths and 714 injuries.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • By the end of the Vietnam War, how many U.S. soldiers were reported killed in fragging incidents, and what about mysterious circumstances?: By the end of the war, the U.S. military reported at least 600 U.S. soldiers killed in fragging incidents. Additionally, another 1,400 soldiers died under circumstances deemed mysterious, which could potentially include unreported fraggings.

By the end of the Vietnam War, the U.S. military reported approximately 150 U.S. soldiers killed in fragging incidents.

Answer: False

The U.S. military reported at least 600 soldiers killed in fragging incidents by the war's end, with an additional 1,400 deaths occurring under mysterious circumstances.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).
  • By the end of the Vietnam War, how many U.S. soldiers were reported killed in fragging incidents, and what about mysterious circumstances?: By the end of the war, the U.S. military reported at least 600 U.S. soldiers killed in fragging incidents. Additionally, another 1,400 soldiers died under circumstances deemed mysterious, which could potentially include unreported fraggings.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Fragging statistics primarily document incidents involving firearms, as grenades were rarely used.

Answer: False

Fragging statistics predominantly document incidents involving explosives, particularly grenades. Murders involving firearms were often difficult to classify as fragging and poorly documented.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the statistics for fragging incidents involving explosives compare to those involving firearms?: Fragging statistics primarily document incidents involving explosives, most commonly grenades. While several hundred murders of U.S. soldiers by firearms occurred, these were often between enlisted men of similar rank and were difficult to quantify as fragging, as they were often indistinguishable from combat deaths and poorly documented.
  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).
  • What is the definition of "fragging" in a military context?: Fragging refers to the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, typically by a fellow soldier, often targeting a superior officer. It is a serious breach of military discipline and conduct.

According to George Lepre's research on fragging incidents involving explosives in Vietnam (1969-1972), approximately how many cases were documented?

Answer: Nearly 900

George Lepre's research documented nearly 900 known and suspected fragging cases involving explosives between 1969 and 1972.

Related Concepts:

  • According to George Lepre, what was the total number of known and suspected fragging cases using explosives in Vietnam between 1969 and 1972?: According to author George Lepre, the total number of known and suspected fragging cases involving explosives from 1969 to 1972 was nearly 900. These incidents resulted in 99 confirmed deaths and numerous injuries.
  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).
  • By the end of the Vietnam War, how many U.S. soldiers were reported killed in fragging incidents, and what about mysterious circumstances?: By the end of the war, the U.S. military reported at least 600 U.S. soldiers killed in fragging incidents. Additionally, another 1,400 soldiers died under circumstances deemed mysterious, which could potentially include unreported fraggings.

What were the estimated numbers of deaths and injuries from fragging incidents according to Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?

Answer: 86 deaths and 714 injuries

Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that fragging incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).
  • According to George Lepre, what was the total number of known and suspected fragging cases using explosives in Vietnam between 1969 and 1972?: According to author George Lepre, the total number of known and suspected fragging cases involving explosives from 1969 to 1972 was nearly 900. These incidents resulted in 99 confirmed deaths and numerous injuries.

How many U.S. soldiers were reported killed in fragging incidents by the end of the Vietnam War, according to the U.S. military?

Answer: At least 600

By the conclusion of the Vietnam War, the U.S. military officially reported at least 600 U.S. soldiers killed in fragging incidents.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).
  • By the end of the Vietnam War, how many U.S. soldiers were reported killed in fragging incidents, and what about mysterious circumstances?: By the end of the war, the U.S. military reported at least 600 U.S. soldiers killed in fragging incidents. Additionally, another 1,400 soldiers died under circumstances deemed mysterious, which could potentially include unreported fraggings.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

4. Military Response and Ineffectiveness

The U.S. military responded to fragging by increasing soldiers' access to grenades in non-combat units.

Answer: False

The U.S. military implemented measures to restrict, not increase, soldiers' access to weapons, particularly grenades in non-combat units, as a response to fragging.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • What was the connection between the breakdown of discipline, including fragging, and the U.S. military's structure?: The breakdown of discipline, exemplified by fragging, was a significant factor that influenced the U.S. military's decision to transition to an all-volunteer force, thereby ending the military draft system. This shift aimed to moderate coercive discipline methods.

Military investigations into fragging were highly effective because distinguishing between fragging and enemy action was straightforward.

Answer: False

Military investigations were often ineffective because distinguishing fragging from enemy action was difficult, and weapons were readily available through a black market.

Related Concepts:

  • Why were the military's responses to fragging often ineffective in reducing incidents?: These measures were often ineffective because soldiers could easily obtain weapons through a flourishing black market. Furthermore, it was challenging for investigators to definitively distinguish between fragging and enemy action, as a grenade thrown into a tent could be attributed to either.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).

The threat of fragging caused officers and NCOs in rear areas to become more relaxed and less cautious.

Answer: False

The threat of fragging led officers and NCOs to become more cautious, often carrying weapons, altering sleeping arrangements, and sometimes overlooking troop indiscipline out of fear.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • How did the threat of fragging influence the behavior of officers and NCOs in rear areas?: The pervasive threat of fragging caused many officers and NCOs to carry weapons even when in rear areas and to alter their sleeping arrangements, as fragging often involved throwing grenades into tents where targets slept. Some leaders also turned a blind eye to drug use and indiscipline among their troops out of fear.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.

The breakdown of discipline, including fragging, was a factor in the U.S. military's decision to transition to an all-volunteer force.

Answer: True

The widespread discipline issues, exemplified by fragging, contributed to the military's shift towards an all-volunteer force to mitigate problems associated with coercive discipline methods.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the connection between the breakdown of discipline, including fragging, and the U.S. military's structure?: The breakdown of discipline, exemplified by fragging, was a significant factor that influenced the U.S. military's decision to transition to an all-volunteer force, thereby ending the military draft system. This shift aimed to moderate coercive discipline methods.
  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.

Why were the U.S. military's measures to curb fragging often ineffective?

Answer: Weapons were easily obtainable via a black market, and distinguishing fragging from enemy action was difficult.

Military measures were often ineffective because weapons were accessible through a black market, and investigators faced challenges in differentiating fragging incidents from enemy actions.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • What societal issues present in the U.S. were also reflected within the military and potentially contributed to fragging?: Societal issues such as racism, widespread drug abuse, and resentment towards authoritarian leaders, which were prevalent in the United States at the time, were also reflected within the military and may have contributed to fragging incidents.
  • Why were the military's responses to fragging often ineffective in reducing incidents?: These measures were often ineffective because soldiers could easily obtain weapons through a flourishing black market. Furthermore, it was challenging for investigators to definitively distinguish between fragging and enemy action, as a grenade thrown into a tent could be attributed to either.

How did the threat of fragging influence the behavior of officers and NCOs in rear areas?

Answer: They often carried weapons, altered sleeping arrangements, and sometimes ignored troop indiscipline out of fear.

The threat of fragging prompted officers and NCOs to adopt defensive measures, such as carrying weapons and altering sleeping arrangements, and some leaders overlooked troop indiscipline due to fear.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the threat of fragging influence the behavior of officers and NCOs in rear areas?: The pervasive threat of fragging caused many officers and NCOs to carry weapons even when in rear areas and to alter their sleeping arrangements, as fragging often involved throwing grenades into tents where targets slept. Some leaders also turned a blind eye to drug use and indiscipline among their troops out of fear.
  • According to the text, why did some enlisted men view fragging as an effective tactic?: With troops increasingly reluctant to risk their lives in what they perceived as a losing war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from pushing for combat operations.
  • Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?: Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents. This indicates that abuse of power by leaders could lead to violent retaliation from their troops.

What was the connection between fragging and the U.S. military's structure at the end of the Vietnam War?

Answer: It contributed to the decision to transition to an all-volunteer force.

The breakdown of discipline, including fragging, was a significant factor influencing the U.S. military's decision to transition to an all-volunteer force, thereby ending the draft.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the high number of fragging incidents in the later years of the Vietnam War signify?: The prevalence of fragging incidents in the latter years of the Vietnam War was a significant indicator of widespread discontent among some military personnel and a breakdown of discipline within parts of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • How did the Tet Offensive influence the incidence of fragging?: The Tet Offensive in early 1968 appears to have catalyzed an increase in fragging incidents. Following this major event, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular both in the United States and among American soldiers serving in Vietnam.
  • What were the estimated numbers of fragging incidents and casualties according to authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage?: Authors Richard A. Gabriel and Paul L. Savage estimated that up to 1,017 fragging incidents may have occurred in Vietnam. Their research suggested these incidents caused 86 deaths and 714 injuries among U.S. military personnel, with the majority of victims being officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs).

5. Historical and Contemporary Parallels

Intentional killings of coalition soldiers by Afghan forces are known as "blue-on-blue" attacks.

Answer: False

Intentional killings of coalition soldiers by Afghan forces are commonly referred to as "green-on-blue attacks" or insider attacks, not "blue-on-blue" which typically refers to friendly fire.

Related Concepts:

  • What term is used for intentional killings of coalition soldiers by Afghan forces during the war in Afghanistan?: Intentional killings of coalition soldiers by members of the Afghan National Security Forces are commonly referred to as "green-on-blue attacks" or insider attacks.
  • According to NATO, how many coalition service members died from deliberate actions by Afghan forces in 2012?: In 2012, NATO reported that 51 coalition service members died as a result of deliberate actions by members of the Afghan forces. An additional 65 NATO soldiers were killed in insider attacks between 2007 and 2011.

The 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests were followed by a decrease in insider attacks against coalition forces.

Answer: False

The 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests correlated with an increase, not a decrease, in insider attacks against coalition forces due to heightened tensions.

Related Concepts:

  • What events seemed to correlate with an increase in insider attacks against coalition forces in Afghanistan?: Increases in insider attacks were noted following high-profile provocations, such as the 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests and the Kandahar massacre, which inflamed tensions between coalition forces and Afghan personnel.

In 2012, NATO reported that 51 coalition service members died from deliberate actions by Afghan forces.

Answer: True

NATO reported that 51 coalition service members lost their lives due to deliberate actions by Afghan forces in 2012, with an additional 65 killed in insider attacks between 2007 and 2011.

Related Concepts:

  • According to NATO, how many coalition service members died from deliberate actions by Afghan forces in 2012?: In 2012, NATO reported that 51 coalition service members died as a result of deliberate actions by members of the Afghan forces. An additional 65 NATO soldiers were killed in insider attacks between 2007 and 2011.
  • What events seemed to correlate with an increase in insider attacks against coalition forces in Afghanistan?: Increases in insider attacks were noted following high-profile provocations, such as the 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests and the Kandahar massacre, which inflamed tensions between coalition forces and Afghan personnel.

What term is used for intentional killings of coalition soldiers by Afghan forces during the war in Afghanistan?

Answer: Green-on-blue attacks or insider attacks

Intentional killings of coalition soldiers by members of the Afghan National Security Forces are commonly referred to as "green-on-blue attacks" or insider attacks.

Related Concepts:

  • What term is used for intentional killings of coalition soldiers by Afghan forces during the war in Afghanistan?: Intentional killings of coalition soldiers by members of the Afghan National Security Forces are commonly referred to as "green-on-blue attacks" or insider attacks.

Which event in 2012 seemed to correlate with an increase in insider attacks against coalition forces in Afghanistan?

Answer: The Afghanistan Quran burning protests.

Increases in insider attacks against coalition forces in Afghanistan were noted following high-profile provocations, such as the 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests.

Related Concepts:

  • What events seemed to correlate with an increase in insider attacks against coalition forces in Afghanistan?: Increases in insider attacks were noted following high-profile provocations, such as the 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests and the Kandahar massacre, which inflamed tensions between coalition forces and Afghan personnel.
  • According to NATO, how many coalition service members died from deliberate actions by Afghan forces in 2012?: In 2012, NATO reported that 51 coalition service members died as a result of deliberate actions by members of the Afghan forces. An additional 65 NATO soldiers were killed in insider attacks between 2007 and 2011.

6. Specific Documented Cases

The incident involving Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann at Saratoga in 1777 was a clear case of fragging initiated by his own soldiers without provocation.

Answer: False

During the Battles of Saratoga in 1777, Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann attacked his own troops, and was subsequently shot and killed by one of his injured soldiers, indicating provocation.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann during the Battles of Saratoga in 1777?: During the Battles of Saratoga in 1777, Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann, disgusted by his troops' performance, began attacking them with his sabre. In response, one of his injured soldiers pulled out a pistol and shot von Breymann dead.
  • What is the definition of "fragging" in a military context?: Fragging refers to the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, typically by a fellow soldier, often targeting a superior officer. It is a serious breach of military discipline and conduct.
  • Besides aggressive leadership, what other frequent motive for fragging is mentioned in the text?: Harassment of subordinates by superiors was another frequent motive cited for fragging incidents. This indicates that abuse of power by leaders could lead to violent retaliation from their troops.

The Nidal Hasan incident at Fort Hood in 2009 involved an attack on civilians outside a military base.

Answer: False

The Nidal Hasan incident at Fort Hood in 2009 involved an attack on fellow soldiers and personnel within the military base itself.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Nidal Hasan incident at Fort Hood in 2009, and what was its outcome?: On November 5, 2009, U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan opened fire at Fort Hood, Texas, killing 13 fellow soldiers and injuring 32 others. He was later convicted of premeditated murder and attempted murder, and sentenced to death.

The death of U.S. Army Private LaVena Johnson in 2005 was officially ruled a homicide by the U.S. Army.

Answer: False

Despite severe injuries suggesting foul play, the U.S. Army officially ruled the death of Private LaVena Johnson in 2005 a suicide, contrary to claims of homicide.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the circumstances surrounding the death of LaVena Johnson in 2005, and what was the official ruling?: The death of U.S. Army Private LaVena Johnson on July 19, 2005, is considered a suspected fragging incident due to her severe injuries, including a broken nose, black eye, loose teeth, gunshot wound to the mouth, and burns. However, the U.S. Army officially ruled her death a suicide, denying claims by her father that she was raped and murdered.

Sergeant Hasan Karim Akbar was convicted of murder and sentenced to death for an attack in Kuwait in March 2003 that killed two soldiers and wounded fourteen.

Answer: True

Sergeant Hasan Karim Akbar was convicted and sentenced to death for murdering two fellow soldiers and wounding fourteen others in Kuwait in March 2003 through a grenade and firearms attack.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the fragging-related incident involving Sergeant Hasan Karim Akbar in Kuwait in March 2003?: On March 23, 2003, in Kuwait, Sergeant Hasan Karim Akbar cut power to his base and threw four hand grenades into tents where fellow members of the 101st Airborne Division were sleeping, then opened fire. This attack killed two soldiers and wounded fourteen. Akbar was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.

In the incident during the Battles of Saratoga in 1777, what led to the death of Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann?

Answer: He was shot by one of his own injured soldiers after attacking his troops.

During the Battles of Saratoga in 1777, Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann attacked his own troops with his sabre and was subsequently shot and killed by one of his injured soldiers.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann during the Battles of Saratoga in 1777?: During the Battles of Saratoga in 1777, Lieutenant Colonel Heinrich von Breymann, disgusted by his troops' performance, began attacking them with his sabre. In response, one of his injured soldiers pulled out a pistol and shot von Breymann dead.

What was the outcome of the Nidal Hasan incident at Fort Hood in 2009?

Answer: He killed 13 fellow soldiers and injured 32 others, later receiving the death sentence.

On November 5, 2009, U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan killed 13 fellow soldiers and injured 32 others in a shooting at Fort Hood, Texas. He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to death.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Nidal Hasan incident at Fort Hood in 2009, and what was its outcome?: On November 5, 2009, U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan opened fire at Fort Hood, Texas, killing 13 fellow soldiers and injuring 32 others. He was later convicted of premeditated murder and attempted murder, and sentenced to death.

What are the circumstances surrounding the death of U.S. Army Private LaVena Johnson in 2005?

Answer: Her death was officially ruled a suicide despite severe injuries suggesting foul play.

Private LaVena Johnson's death in 2005, marked by severe injuries, was officially ruled a suicide by the U.S. Army, despite her father's claims of homicide.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the circumstances surrounding the death of LaVena Johnson in 2005, and what was the official ruling?: The death of U.S. Army Private LaVena Johnson on July 19, 2005, is considered a suspected fragging incident due to her severe injuries, including a broken nose, black eye, loose teeth, gunshot wound to the mouth, and burns. However, the U.S. Army officially ruled her death a suicide, denying claims by her father that she was raped and murdered.

What happened aboard the submarine HMS Astute on April 28, 2011?

Answer: Able Seaman Ryan Donovan shot and killed three crew members after abandoning his post.

On April 28, 2011, Able Seaman Ryan Donovan killed three crew members and wounded others aboard the submarine HMS Astute after taking a rifle from the weapons locker.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the incident aboard the submarine HMS Astute on April 28, 2011.: On April 28, 2011, Able Seaman Ryan Donovan abandoned his post on the submarine HMS Astute, took an SA80 rifle from the weapons locker, and opened fire on crew members. He killed three people and wounded others before being subdued. Donovan pleaded guilty to murder and attempted murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment.

What was the suspected cause of death for Charles XII of Sweden in 1718?

Answer: He was shot during the siege of Halden, possibly by one of his own soldiers.

Charles XII of Sweden was shot and killed during the siege of Halden in 1718, with historical accounts suggesting the fatal shot may have originated from one of his own soldiers.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Charles XII of Sweden die in 1718, and what is the suspected cause?: Charles XII of Sweden was shot and killed during the siege of Halden in 1718. Historical accounts suggest the fatal shot was possibly fired by one of his own soldiers, indicating a potential fragging incident.

The incident involving Private George Green Jr. in Champigneulles, France, during WWII, was motivated by:

Answer: An argument after Green was ordered to clean up spilled urine.

Private George Green Jr. shot and killed Corporal Tommie Lee Garrett in France during WWII after Garrett ordered Green to clean up spilled urine.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the notable fragging incident from World War II in Champigneulles, France?: On November 18, 1944, in Champigneulles, France, Private George Green Jr. shot and killed Corporal Tommie Lee Garrett, an hour after Garrett had ordered Green to clean up spilled urine. Green was subsequently convicted of murder and executed.

What was the purpose of the "$10,000 bounty" mentioned in relation to Colonel Weldon Honeycutt during the Vietnam War?

Answer: It was placed by an underground newspaper on Colonel Honeycutt, leading to fragging attempts against him.

An underground newspaper placed a $10,000 bounty on Colonel Weldon Honeycutt following controversial U.S. casualties, which resulted in multiple unsuccessful fragging attempts against him.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the "G.I Says" bounty related to in the Vietnam War?: In 1969, following controversial U.S. casualties at the Battle of Hamburger Hill, the G.I. underground newspaper "G.I Says" placed a $10,000 bounty on Colonel Weldon Honeycutt. This led to multiple unsuccessful fragging attempts against him.

What happened to First Lieutenant Robert T. Rohweller in 1969?

Answer: He was killed when a grenade was thrown into his company office.

First Lieutenant Robert T. Rohweller was killed in 1969 when a grenade was thrown into his company office at the Quảng Trị Combat Base in South Vietnam.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was First Lieutenant Robert T. Rohweller, and what happened to him in 1969?: First Lieutenant Robert T. Rohweller was killed on April 21, 1969, when a grenade was thrown into his company office at Quảng Trị Combat Base in South Vietnam. Private Reginald F. Smith was apprehended, pleaded guilty to premeditated murder, and was sentenced to 40 years imprisonment.

The incident involving Private Peter Denzil Allen and Lieutenant Robert Thomas Convery in Nui Dat, South Vietnam, involved which weapon?

Answer: A grenade

The fragging incident involving Lieutenant Robert Thomas Convery in Nui Dat, South Vietnam, resulted from a grenade being rolled into his tent, killing him.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the fragging incident involving Lieutenant Robert Thomas Convery in Nui Dat, South Vietnam.: On November 23, 1969, following a night of heavy drinking within the 9th Battalion of the Royal Australian Regiment at Nui Dat, a grenade was rolled into Lieutenant Robert Thomas Convery's tent, killing him. Private Peter Denzil Allen was convicted of the murder and served over ten years of his sentence.

What was the outcome for Irish Army Private Michael McAleavey after he opened fire at a checkpoint in Tebnine, Lebanon, in 1982?

Answer: He was sentenced to life imprisonment after confessing he 'snapped'.

Irish Army Private Michael McAleavey was sentenced to life imprisonment after opening fire at a checkpoint in Tebnine, Lebanon, killing three fellow soldiers, and confessing that he had "snapped."

Related Concepts:

  • What incident occurred in Tebnine with the UNIFIL in 1982?: On October 27, 1982, while serving with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in Tebnine, Irish Army Private Michael McAleavey opened fire at a checkpoint, killing three fellow soldiers. He confessed to having "snapped" due to dehydration and heat exhaustion and was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Which of the following incidents involved a soldier opening fire at a training ground, resulting in one death and three injuries?

Answer: The Camp Yamaguchi shooting in Japan

The Camp Yamaguchi shooting in Japan on February 27, 1984, involved a soldier firing on his squadron at a training ground, resulting in one death and three injuries.

Related Concepts:

  • What occurred on February 27, 1984, at Camp Yamaguchi in Japan?: On February 27, 1984, a soldier in the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force went on a shooting spree at the training ground of Camp Yamaguchi, firing on his squadron. The incident resulted in one death and three injuries.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy