Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 8
The uncertainty of the future means that speakers often use modality to express future events, reflecting probability or intent.
Answer: True
The inherent uncertainty of future events leads speakers to employ modality, which expresses their attitude towards the event's likelihood (probability) or their personal commitment (intent), rather than stating it as a certainty.
Languages lacking a distinct grammatical future tense rely solely on context to convey future meaning.
Answer: False
Languages without a distinct grammatical future tense typically utilize a combination of context, temporal adverbs, and the grammaticalization of these adverbs to convey future meaning, rather than relying solely on context.
Temporal adverbs indicating past times can evolve into grammaticalized future tense markers.
Answer: False
Temporal adverbs that evolve into grammaticalized markers typically indicate future times, not past times. This process involves lexical items becoming grammatical elements that consistently signal future reference.
The linguistic term 'FUT' in glossing stands for 'future perfect'.
Answer: False
In linguistic glossing conventions, 'FUT' is the standard abbreviation for 'future tense', not 'future perfect'.
A crastinal tense refers to occurrences happening on the day immediately preceding the current day.
Answer: False
A crastinal tense refers to events occurring on the day immediately following the current day, essentially meaning 'tomorrow', not the day preceding it.
The 'irrealis mood' signifies a factual state of future events.
Answer: False
The 'irrealis mood' signifies a non-factual or hypothetical state, often related to uncertainty or possibility regarding future events, rather than a factual state.
Temporal adverbs like 'tomorrow' can become grammaticalized future tense markers.
Answer: True
Temporal adverbs, such as 'tomorrow,' can undergo grammaticalization, evolving from lexical items into fixed grammatical markers that consistently signify future tense.
The linguistic term for a verb form marking an event as already happened is the future tense.
Answer: False
The linguistic term for a verb form marking an event as already happened is the past tense, not the future tense.
The distinction between 'realis' and 'irrealis' relates to the speaker's certainty about the factual status of a future event.
Answer: True
The distinction between 'realis' and 'irrealis' pertains to the speaker's perspective on the certainty or factual grounding of a future event, differentiating between events perceived as actual versus those considered hypothetical or uncertain.
Grammaticalization is the process where lexical items evolve into grammatical markers, such as temporal adverbs becoming future tense markers.
Answer: True
Grammaticalization describes the linguistic process by which lexical items, such as temporal adverbs, transform into grammatical markers, thereby acquiring functional roles like indicating future tense.
The present tense refers to actions occurring after the moment of speaking.
Answer: False
The present tense refers to actions or states occurring at the moment of speaking or within the present time frame, not actions occurring after the moment of speaking, which is the domain of the future tense.
What is the primary function of a future tense verb form?
Answer: To indicate that an event has not yet happened but is expected to occur.
The primary function of a future tense verb form is to denote an event that has not yet transpired but is anticipated to occur.
How do languages without a distinct grammatical future tense typically convey future meaning?
Answer: By relying on context, temporal adverbs, or grammaticalization of adverbs.
Languages lacking a specific grammatical future tense typically convey future meaning through context, the use of temporal adverbs, or the grammaticalization of these adverbs into future markers.
What does the abbreviation 'FUT' stand for in linguistic glossing?
Answer: Future Tense.
In linguistic glossing, the abbreviation 'FUT' conventionally stands for 'future tense'.
What is a 'crastinal tense'?
Answer: A tense referring to events tomorrow.
A 'crastinal tense' is a linguistic term referring to events that occur on the day immediately following the current day, essentially denoting 'tomorrow'.
What is the significance of the distinction between 'realis' and 'irrealis' in expressing future events?
Answer: It relates to the speaker's perspective on the certainty or factual status of the event.
The distinction between 'realis' and 'irrealis' is significant because it reflects the speaker's perspective on the certainty or factual status of a future event.
How does grammaticalization apply to the expression of future tense?
Answer: It is the process where lexical items evolve into grammatical markers, like temporal adverbs becoming future tense markers.
Grammaticalization applies to future tense expression by facilitating the evolution of lexical items, such as temporal adverbs, into grammatical markers that signify future time.
What is the difference between the present tense and the future tense?
Answer: Present tense refers to actions at the time of speaking, future tense to actions expected after speaking.
The present tense denotes actions occurring at the moment of speaking, whereas the future tense refers to actions anticipated to occur after the moment of speaking.
In grammar, a future tense verb form exclusively indicates that an event has not yet happened relative to the moment of speaking.
Answer: False
The statement is false because while future tense verb forms generally indicate events yet to happen, they do not exclusively do so. The nuance of 'generally' versus 'exclusively' is critical in linguistic definitions.
English utilizes specific verb endings, known as inflections, to exclusively mark the future tense.
Answer: False
This statement is false. English does not possess an inflectional future tense; instead, it relies on auxiliary verbs such as 'will' and 'shall' or employs the present tense with temporal adverbs to convey future meaning.
The English 'will/shall' future construction combines a modal auxiliary with the main verb's infinitive.
Answer: True
The standard English future construction using 'will' or 'shall' involves combining the modal auxiliary verb with the bare infinitive of the main verb, as in 'He will go' or 'She shall see'.
The English modal verb 'will' can only convey future meaning and never habit or willingness.
Answer: False
The English modal verb 'will' is versatile; beyond indicating future events, it can also convey habit (e.g., 'He will often interrupt') or willingness (e.g., 'Will you help me?').
The 'going-to' future construction in English is primarily used to express past intentions.
Answer: False
The 'going-to' future construction in English is primarily used to express future intentions, plans, or predictions based on current evidence, not past intentions.
The 'simple future' in English grammar refers to the construction using 'will' or 'shall' followed by the bare infinitive.
Answer: True
The term 'simple future' in English grammar accurately describes the construction formed by 'will' or 'shall' followed by the base form (bare infinitive) of the main verb, such as 'I will go' or 'They shall arrive'.
The future progressive form in English, like 'He will be working,' indicates an action completed before a future point.
Answer: False
The future progressive form, such as 'He will be working,' indicates an action that will be in progress at a specific time in the future, not an action completed before a future point. The latter is characteristic of the future perfect tense.
The 'going-to' future in English often suggests a spontaneous decision or a simple prediction.
Answer: False
The 'going-to' future in English typically suggests a pre-existing plan, intention, or a prediction based on current evidence, rather than a spontaneous decision or a simple prediction.
The futurate present tense in English uses future auxiliary verbs to refer to scheduled events.
Answer: False
The futurate present tense in English uses present tense forms (e.g., 'The train leaves at 6 PM') to refer to scheduled future events, not future auxiliary verbs.
The simple future ('I will go') refers to an action completed before a specific point in the future.
Answer: False
The simple future ('I will go') refers to an action or state that is expected to occur after the moment of speaking, not an action completed before a future point, which is the function of the future perfect tense.
Which statement accurately describes the future tense in English?
Answer: English lacks an inflectional future tense and uses auxiliaries like 'will' and 'shall'.
English does not possess a distinct inflectional future tense; instead, it relies on auxiliary verbs such as 'will' and 'shall' or other constructions to convey future meaning.
Which of the following is a common way English refers to future events besides the 'will/shall' construction?
Answer: The futurate present tense.
Besides the 'will/shall' construction, English commonly refers to future events using the futurate present tense (e.g., 'The meeting starts at 10 AM').
Beyond indicating futurity, what other meaning can the English modal verb 'shall' convey?
Answer: Obligation or command.
In addition to indicating future events, the English modal verb 'shall' can also convey a sense of obligation or command, as in 'You shall not pass'.
What nuance does the 'going-to' future construction often imply in English?
Answer: A pre-existing plan, intention, or prediction based on current evidence.
The 'going-to' future construction in English often implies a pre-existing plan or intention, or a prediction grounded in present evidence.
How is the future perfect tense formed in English?
Answer: Using 'will' + 'have' + past participle.
The future perfect tense in English is formed by combining 'will have' with the past participle of the main verb.
Which of the following best describes the nuance difference between English 'will/shall' future and 'going-to' future?
Answer: 'Will/shall' can imply spontaneous decisions or predictions, while 'going-to' often suggests pre-existing plans or intentions.
The 'will/shall' future in English can imply spontaneous decisions or predictions, whereas the 'going-to' future typically suggests pre-existing plans or intentions.
Germanic languages, including English, often express the future using the present tense combined with temporal adverbs.
Answer: True
Many Germanic languages, including English, frequently utilize the present tense in conjunction with temporal adverbs (e.g., 'tomorrow,' 'next week') to indicate future events, thereby relying on context rather than dedicated future verb morphology.
Dutch expresses the future tense using only the auxiliary 'zullen' (shall) followed by an infinitive.
Answer: False
Dutch expresses the future not only with the auxiliary 'zullen' followed by an infinitive but also commonly uses 'gaan' (to go) plus an infinitive, or the present tense with appropriate temporal context.
Dutch 'zullen' is primarily used for expressing habit or willingness, similar to English 'will'.
Answer: False
Dutch 'zullen' is more akin to English 'shall,' often conveying promises, probability, or obligation, whereas English 'will' more commonly expresses habit or willingness.
Swedish typically uses the construction 'kommer att' to express a pure future meaning.
Answer: True
The Swedish construction 'kommer att' (literally 'comes to') is indeed the typical method for expressing a pure future meaning, indicating an event that will occur irrespective of the speaker's intention.
In Swedish, the present tense combined with a distinct time specification is commonly used for future reference.
Answer: True
It is common in Swedish to use the present tense, supplemented by specific time specifications (e.g., 'tomorrow'), to refer to future events, alongside constructions like 'kommer att'.
The Swedish construction 'kommer att' is comparable to the English 'will' for general future reference.
Answer: True
The Swedish construction 'kommer att' functions similarly to the English 'will' when used for general future reference, indicating an event that is expected to happen.
Dutch uses 'gaan' + infinitive, 'zullen' + infinitive, or the present tense with context to express the future.
Answer: True
Dutch employs multiple strategies to express the future, including the constructions 'gaan' + infinitive, 'zullen' + infinitive, and the present tense when supported by contextual or adverbial time specifications.
In Germanic languages, how is the future often expressed without a specific morphological future tense?
Answer: By using the present tense combined with temporal adverbs.
Germanic languages frequently express the future by utilizing the present tense in conjunction with temporal adverbs, circumventing the need for specific morphological future tense markers.
What is the primary difference in usage between Dutch 'zullen' and English 'will'?
Answer: Dutch 'zullen' is akin to English 'shall' (promises, probability), while English 'will' often expresses habit or willingness.
Dutch 'zullen' functions similarly to English 'shall,' conveying promises, probability, or obligation, whereas English 'will' more frequently expresses habit or willingness.
How does Swedish typically express a pure future meaning?
Answer: Using the construction 'kommer att'.
Swedish typically expresses a pure future meaning through the construction 'kommer att', which literally translates to 'comes to'.
How do languages like Dutch and Swedish express future events?
Answer: Dutch uses 'gaan' + infinitive or 'zullen' + infinitive; Swedish uses 'kommer att' or 'skall', often supplemented by present tense with time specifications.
Dutch expresses the future using 'gaan' + infinitive or 'zullen' + infinitive, while Swedish employs 'kommer att' or 'skall', often supplemented by the present tense with time specifications.
The French verb form 'achètera' is an example of a future tense, meaning 'will buy'.
Answer: True
This statement is true. The French verb form 'achètera' is indeed a future tense conjugation, accurately translating to 'will buy'.
Auxiliary verb constructions, combining an auxiliary with a main verb's infinitive, are a common method for expressing futurity in many European languages.
Answer: True
Many European languages, particularly those in the Romance family, frequently employ auxiliary verb constructions. These typically involve pairing an auxiliary verb with the infinitive form of the main verb to express future time.
The future tense in Western Romance languages developed from constructions using the auxiliary verb 'habere' (to have) combined with a past participle.
Answer: False
The future tense in Western Romance languages evolved from periphrastic constructions in Vulgar Latin that combined an infinitive with the auxiliary verb 'habere' (to have), not a past participle.
Classical Latin formed the future tense by adding specific suffixes directly to the main verb stem.
Answer: True
Classical Latin employed a system of inflectional morphology to form the future tense, adding specific suffixes directly to the verb stem, with variations across different verb conjugations.
The future tense in Vulgar Latin evolved into periphrastic constructions using an infinitive combined with 'habere' (to have).
Answer: True
Vulgar Latin saw the development of future tense forms through periphrastic constructions, notably by combining an infinitive with the auxiliary verb 'habere' (to have), which laid the groundwork for Romance future tenses.
Romance languages like French, Portuguese, and Spanish form their future tenses by adding endings to the past participle stem.
Answer: False
Romance languages such as French, Portuguese, and Spanish form their future tenses by adding specific endings to the infinitive stem, not the past participle stem.
Phonetic changes did not affect the infinitive stems during the development of Romance future tense forms.
Answer: False
Phonetic changes did indeed affect the infinitive stems during the evolution of Romance future tense forms. For instance, Spanish 'salir' (to go out) developed into the future stem 'saldr-'.
The Latin verb 'habere' evolved into future tense forms in Romance languages by being combined with past participles.
Answer: False
The Latin verb 'habere' evolved into future tense forms in Romance languages by being combined with infinitives in Vulgar Latin, not past participles.
Portuguese and Spanish form their future tenses by adding specific endings to the past participle stem.
Answer: False
Portuguese and Spanish form their future tenses by adding specific endings to the infinitive stem, not the past participle stem.
Languages like French possess a distinct morphological future tense, unlike English which relies on auxiliaries.
Answer: True
French, characteristic of many Romance languages, features a distinct morphological future tense formed by inflecting verb stems. English, conversely, primarily relies on auxiliary verbs like 'will' and 'shall' to express futurity.
The Latin verb 'habere' combined with infinitives in Vulgar Latin led to the development of future tense endings in Romance languages.
Answer: True
The combination of the Latin verb 'habere' with infinitives in Vulgar Latin was a key factor in the grammaticalization process that resulted in the development of future tense endings across the Romance languages.
What is the origin of the future tense in Western Romance languages?
Answer: Development from periphrastic constructions in Vulgar Latin using 'habere' (to have).
The future tense in Western Romance languages originated from periphrastic constructions in Vulgar Latin, specifically those combining an infinitive with the auxiliary verb 'habere' (to have).
Classical Latin formed the future tense by:
Answer: Adding specific suffixes directly to the main verb stem.
Classical Latin formed its future tense through inflectional suffixes attached directly to the main verb stem.
The evolution of future tense in Romance languages from Vulgar Latin involved:
Answer: Periphrastic constructions combining an infinitive with 'habere' (to have).
The evolution of the future tense in Romance languages from Vulgar Latin primarily involved periphrastic constructions that combined an infinitive with the auxiliary verb 'habere' (to have).
Which of these Romance languages forms its future tense by adding endings to the infinitive stem?
Answer: French, Portuguese, and Spanish.
French, Portuguese, and Spanish all form their future tenses by adding specific endings to the infinitive stem of the verb.
What phonetic change is mentioned as affecting Romance future tense forms, using Spanish as an example?
Answer: The infinitive 'salir' changing to the future stem 'saldr-'.
A notable phonetic change affecting Romance future tense forms is seen in Spanish, where the infinitive 'salir' (to go out) evolved into the future stem 'saldr-'.
How did the Latin verb 'habere' contribute to the formation of future tenses in Romance languages?
Answer: It was combined with infinitives in Vulgar Latin and grammaticalized into future tense markers.
The Latin verb 'habere' was combined with infinitives in Vulgar Latin, undergoing grammaticalization to become future tense markers in the Romance languages.
What is the relationship between the Latin verb 'habere' and the future tense in Romance languages?
Answer: 'Habere' was used with infinitives in Vulgar Latin, leading to the grammaticalization of future tense endings.
The Latin verb 'habere' played a crucial role in the formation of future tenses in Romance languages by being combined with infinitives in Vulgar Latin, subsequently grammaticalizing into future tense endings.
In Hindi, future indicative forms are created using future subjunctive verb forms and adding a suffix like '-gā'.
Answer: True
Hindi future indicative forms are constructed by employing future subjunctive verb forms and appending a suffix, such as '-gā', which varies based on the subject's gender and number.
The habitual mood in Hindi can be conjugated into the future tense.
Answer: False
The habitual mood in Hindi is distinct from the future tense and cannot be conjugated to express future events; future reference is typically achieved through other grammatical constructions.
The prospective future in Hindi is formed using the prospective future participle followed by the auxiliary verb 'honā' (to be).
Answer: True
The prospective future in Hindi is indeed constructed by utilizing the prospective future participle, which is then followed by the conjugated forms of the auxiliary verb 'honā' (to be).
The Hindi suffix '-gā' is used to form the past indicative tense and declines for gender and number.
Answer: False
The Hindi suffix '-gā' is used to form the future indicative tense, not the past indicative tense. It does decline for gender and number.
How are future indicative forms created in Hindi?
Answer: By using future subjunctive forms and adding a suffix like '-gā'.
Future indicative forms in Hindi are constructed by employing future subjunctive verb forms and appending a suffix, such as '-gā', which varies based on gender and number.
What is the function of the Hindi suffix -gā in verb conjugation?
Answer: To form the future indicative tense.
The Hindi suffix '-gā' serves the function of forming the future indicative tense, and it declines according to the gender and number of the subject.
Biblical Hebrew uses the 'Waw consecutive' construct to make the Imperfect tense refer to the past.
Answer: True
In Biblical Hebrew, the 'Waw consecutive' construct, when attached to an Imperfect tense verb, serves to shift its temporal reference, causing it to denote past events.
Modern Hebrew consistently uses the perfect form of the verb to indicate the future tense.
Answer: False
Modern Hebrew consistently employs the imperfect form of the verb to indicate the future tense, whereas the perfect form is used for past events. The 'Waw consecutive' is largely absent in modern usage.
In Arabic, the future tense is formed by adding the prefix 'sa-' or the clitic 'sawfa' to the past tense verb.
Answer: False
In Arabic, the future tense is formed by attaching the prefix 'sa-' or the clitic 'sawfa' to the present tense verb form, not the past tense verb.
In Biblical Hebrew, the 'Waw consecutive' construct attached to a Perfect tense verb can indicate future events.
Answer: True
The 'Waw consecutive' construct in Biblical Hebrew, when appended to a Perfect tense verb, serves to shift its temporal reference, enabling it to indicate future events.
Modern Standard Arabic forms the future tense by adding the prefix 'sa-' or 'sawfa' to the present tense verb.
Answer: True
Modern Standard Arabic indicates the future tense by prefixing 'sa-' or 'sawfa' to the present tense verb form, signifying that the action will occur in the future.
Arabic indicates the future tense by adding the prefix 'sa-' or 'sawfa' to the past tense verb form.
Answer: False
Arabic indicates the future tense by adding the prefix 'sa-' or 'sawfa' to the *present* tense verb form, not the past tense verb form.
In Biblical Hebrew, what construct can invert the time reference of a Perfect tense verb to indicate future events?
Answer: The 'Waw consecutive'.
The 'Waw consecutive' construct in Biblical Hebrew is capable of inverting the temporal reference of a Perfect tense verb, thereby enabling it to indicate future events.
How does Modern Hebrew indicate the future tense?
Answer: Using the imperfect form of the verb.
Modern Hebrew indicates the future tense by consistently employing the imperfect form of the verb.
What prefixes are used in Modern Standard Arabic to form the future tense?
Answer: 'sa-' or 'sawfa'.
Modern Standard Arabic forms the future tense by adding the prefixes 'sa-' or 'sawfa' to the present tense verb.
How does Arabic indicate the future tense?
Answer: By adding the prefix 'sa-' or 'sawfa' to the present tense verb.
Arabic indicates the future tense by adding the prefixes 'sa-' or 'sawfa' to the present tense verb form.
Mandarin Chinese possesses grammatical tense markers similar to European languages.
Answer: False
Mandarin Chinese does not possess grammatical tense markers in the way that many European languages do; it relies on context and temporal adverbs to indicate the time of an action.
The modal verb 'huì' in Mandarin Chinese can signify futurity.
Answer: True
The Mandarin Chinese auxiliary verb 'huì,' which primarily means 'can' or 'know how to,' can also function to signify futurity, indicating a future event or possibility.
Mandarin Chinese relies heavily on grammatical tense marking to indicate future time.
Answer: False
Mandarin Chinese does not rely heavily on grammatical tense marking; instead, it primarily uses context and temporal adverbs to convey future time reference.
The auxiliary verb 'huì' in Mandarin Chinese primarily means 'will' or 'shall'.
Answer: False
The Mandarin Chinese auxiliary verb 'huì' primarily signifies 'can' or 'know how to'; while it can indicate futurity, its core meaning is not 'will' or 'shall'.
In Mandarin Chinese, context and temporal adverbs are crucial for indicating future time due to the absence of grammatical tense.
Answer: True
Due to Mandarin Chinese's lack of grammatical tense, context and temporal adverbs play a crucial role in signaling future time reference.
Which statement is true about Mandarin Chinese regarding tense?
Answer: It lacks grammatical tense and indicates time via context or adverbs.
Mandarin Chinese lacks grammatical tense and relies on context and temporal adverbs to indicate the time of an action, including future events.
What is the role of the auxiliary verb 'huì' in Mandarin Chinese?
Answer: It primarily means 'can' or 'know how to' but can also signify futurity.
The auxiliary verb 'huì' in Mandarin Chinese primarily signifies ability ('can' or 'know how to') but can also function to indicate futurity.
What is the role of context and temporal adverbs in Mandarin Chinese regarding future time?
Answer: They are crucial for indicating future time due to the absence of grammatical tense.
In Mandarin Chinese, context and temporal adverbs are crucial for indicating future time because the language lacks grammatical tense markers.
Many Creole languages express the future using a post-verbal marker derived from 'go'.
Answer: False
Many Creole languages express the future using a *pre-verbal* marker, often derived from 'go' (similar to English 'going to'), rather than a post-verbal marker.
Creole languages tend to prioritize tense marking over aspect marking.
Answer: False
Creole languages generally tend to prioritize aspect marking over tense marking. When tense, aspect, and modality are marked, they typically use invariant pre-verbal markers in a specific sequence.
The future marker in Jamaican Creole is typically '/de go/' or '/a go/'.
Answer: True
The future marker in Jamaican Creole is indeed typically expressed as '/de go/' or '/a go/', functioning as pre-verbal markers for future events.
In Belizean Creole, the future tense is indicated by a mandatory, invariant post-verbal particle.
Answer: False
In Belizean Creole, the future tense is indicated by a mandatory, invariant *pre-verbal* particle, not a post-verbal one.
The pre-verbal future marker in Hawaiian Creole English is 'gon'.
Answer: True
The pre-verbal future marker commonly used in Hawaiian Creole English is 'gon', as exemplified in phrases like 'Ai gon bai wan pikap' (I'm going to buy a pickup).
Haitian Creole uses the post-verbal markers 'pral' or 'va' to indicate the future.
Answer: False
Haitian Creole utilizes the *pre-verbal* markers 'pral' or 'va' to indicate the future, not post-verbal markers.
What is a common characteristic of future expression in many Creole languages?
Answer: Prioritization of aspect marking over tense marking, often using pre-verbal markers.
A common characteristic of future expression in many Creole languages is the prioritization of aspect marking over tense marking, frequently employing invariant pre-verbal markers.
What is the future marker in Jamaican Creole?
Answer: 'de go' or 'a go'.
The future marker in Jamaican Creole is typically '/de go/' or '/a go/', functioning as pre-verbal markers.
In Haitian Creole, which markers are used interchangeably to indicate the future?
Answer: 'pral' or 'va'.
Haitian Creole uses the pre-verbal markers 'pral' or 'va' interchangeably to indicate the future.