Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
Hacienda Luisita is a vast agricultural estate primarily dedicated to rice cultivation, spanning over 15,000 acres in the province of Tarlac.
Answer: False
The source indicates Hacienda Luisita is primarily a sugar plantation, not dedicated to rice cultivation, and specifies its size as 6,453 hectares (approximately 15,950 acres).
The original owner of Hacienda Luisita was the Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas, commonly known as Tabacalera.
Answer: True
The source confirms that the Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas, or Tabacalera, was the original owner of Hacienda Luisita.
During the Spanish colonial era, Hacienda Luisita was primarily used for tobacco cultivation under Tabacalera's extensive landholdings.
Answer: True
The source confirms that during the Spanish colonial period, Hacienda Luisita was part of Tabacalera's holdings and the company was involved in the tobacco business.
Hacienda Luisita's sugar production during the American period supplied approximately half of the United States' sugar needs.
Answer: False
During the American period, Hacienda Luisita's sugar production supplied approximately 20% of the United States' sugar needs, not half.
The Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT), a sugar refinery, was established at Hacienda Luisita during the Spanish colonial period.
Answer: False
The Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT) was established during the American period, not the Spanish colonial period.
During the Japanese occupation, Hacienda Luisita ceased sugar production to avoid collaboration with the occupying forces.
Answer: False
Contrary to the statement, Hacienda Luisita maintained its sugar production operations during the Japanese occupation.
Luis Taruc formed the HUKBALAHAP, a peasant guerrilla army that included members from Hacienda Luisita, during the Japanese occupation.
Answer: True
Luis Taruc formed the HUKBALAHAP, a peasant guerrilla army, during the Japanese occupation, and it included members from Hacienda Luisita.
General Douglas MacArthur used Hacienda Luisita as his headquarters during the Allied forces' campaign against Japanese troops in 1945.
Answer: True
General Douglas MacArthur established his headquarters at Hacienda Luisita in 1945 during the Allied campaign against Japanese forces.
Benigno Aquino Jr. was imprisoned following the declaration of Martial Law in 1972, facing charges including treason and murder.
Answer: True
Benigno Aquino Jr. was imprisoned after the declaration of Martial Law in 1972, facing multiple charges including treason and murder.
What is Hacienda Luisita and where is it primarily located?
Answer: A sugar plantation covering 6,453 hectares in the province of Tarlac, Philippines.
Hacienda Luisita is identified as a significant sugar plantation situated in Tarlac province, encompassing approximately 6,453 hectares.
Who was the original owner of Hacienda Luisita before its acquisition by the Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas?
Answer: The source does not specify an owner prior to Tabacalera.
The provided source material identifies the Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas (Tabacalera) as the original owner in the context of its historical significance and acquisition, and does not specify any prior owners.
Which major industrial facility was established at Hacienda Luisita during the American period to increase sugar production efficiency?
Answer: A sugar refinery named Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT).
During the American period, the Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT), a sugar refinery, was established at Hacienda Luisita to enhance sugar production efficiency.
During the Japanese occupation, Hacienda Luisita continued sugar production as part of a Japanese policy to:
Answer: Ensure the availability of essential commodities like sugar.
Hacienda Luisita maintained sugar production during the Japanese occupation as part of a policy to ensure the availability of essential commodities like sugar.
What peasant guerrilla movement, active during the Japanese occupation, included members from Hacienda Luisita?
Answer: The HUKBALAHAP
The HUKBALAHAP, a peasant-based guerrilla army formed by Luis Taruc during the Japanese occupation, included many members from Hacienda Luisita.
What significant political event occurred in September 1972 that led to the imprisonment of Benigno Aquino Jr.?
Answer: The declaration of Martial Law.
Martial Law was declared in the Philippines on September 21, 1972, leading to the imprisonment of Benigno Aquino Jr. among other political figures.
The Cojuangco family acquired Hacienda Luisita in the early 1950s.
Answer: False
The acquisition by the Cojuangco family occurred in the late 1950s, not the early part of the decade.
Tabacalera decided to sell Hacienda Luisita in 1957 primarily due to declining profits and market saturation.
Answer: False
Tabacalera's decision to sell Hacienda Luisita in 1957 was primarily driven by ongoing unrest caused by Hukbalahap rebels, not declining profits or market saturation.
President Ramon Magsaysay approved the sale of Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT) to the López brothers.
Answer: False
President Ramon Magsaysay vetoed the sale of Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT) to the López brothers.
The acquisition of Hacienda Luisita and CAT by José Cojuangco Sr. was facilitated by President Magsaysay and involved loans secured with government assistance.
Answer: True
President Magsaysay facilitated the acquisition of CAT and Hacienda Luisita by José Cojuangco Sr., with the government assisting in securing loans.
A condition for the loan used to purchase CAT and Hacienda Luisita was that the hacienda must be distributed to farmers within five years.
Answer: False
While a condition for the loan was the distribution of the hacienda to farmers, the source does not specify a five-year timeframe for this distribution.
Tarlac Development Corporation (TADECO) officially took ownership of Hacienda Luisita and CAT in 1957.
Answer: False
Tarlac Development Corporation (TADECO) officially took ownership of Hacienda Luisita and CAT in 1958, not 1957.
In which decade did the Cojuangco family acquire Hacienda Luisita?
Answer: 1950s
The Cojuangco family acquired Hacienda Luisita in the late 1950s.
Why did Tabacalera decide to sell Hacienda Luisita and its associated sugar mill in 1957?
Answer: Ongoing problems and unrest caused by Hukbalahap rebels.
Tabacalera's decision to sell Hacienda Luisita in 1957 was primarily driven by ongoing unrest caused by Hukbalahap rebels, not declining profits or market saturation.
Who was initially slated to purchase Central Azucarera de Tarlac, and why was the sale blocked?
Answer: The López brothers, Eugenio and Fernando.
The López brothers, Eugenio and Fernando, were initially set to purchase CAT, but President Ramon Magsaysay vetoed the sale due to concerns about their growing business influence.
What was a key condition set by the Central Bank for the loan used to purchase CAT and Hacienda Luisita?
Answer: CAT had to be purchased together with Hacienda Luisita.
A key condition for the Central Bank loan was that CAT had to be purchased concurrently with Hacienda Luisita, and the hacienda was mandated for distribution to farmers.
In what year did Tarlac Development Corporation (TADECO) officially become the owner of Hacienda Luisita and CAT?
Answer: 1958
Tarlac Development Corporation (TADECO) officially took ownership of Hacienda Luisita and CAT in 1958, not 1957.
Under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program's stock distribution option, farm workers were allocated 70 percent of Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (HLI) stock shares.
Answer: False
Under the Stock Distribution Option (SDO) implemented for CARP compliance, farm workers were allocated 30 percent of Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (HLI) stock shares, with the Cojuangco family retaining the majority.
The ten-year period for land distribution at Hacienda Luisita concluded in 1967, after which farmers began organizing for land advocacy.
Answer: True
The mandated ten-year period for land distribution concluded in 1967, prompting farmers to commence organizing for land advocacy.
The Mendiola Massacre occurred during President Corazón Aquino's administration, involving farmers protesting for land reform.
Answer: True
The Mendiola Massacre took place during President Corazón Aquino's administration amidst farmer protests advocating for land reform.
Republic Act No. 6657, signed in 1988, established the framework for the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP).
Answer: True
Republic Act No. 6657, enacted in 1988, serves as the legislative foundation for the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP).
The Stock Distribution Option (SDO) allowed landowners to comply with agrarian reform by distributing company shares instead of land parcels.
Answer: True
The Stock Distribution Option (SDO) provided landowners with a mechanism to fulfill agrarian reform obligations by distributing corporate shares rather than physical land parcels.
In 1988, Hacienda Luisita incorporated 4,915.75 hectares into HLI for CARP compliance, with a referendum showing 92.9% of workers favoring direct land distribution.
Answer: False
The 1988 referendum indicated that 92.9% of farm workers favored the Stock Distribution Option (SDO), not direct land distribution.
Following the SDO implementation in 1989, the Cojuangco group retained 33% of Hacienda Luisita's stock shares, with farm workers holding the remaining 67%.
Answer: False
After the SDO implementation in 1989, the Cojuangco group retained 67% of HLI stock shares, with farm workers holding 33%.
In September 1995, a significant portion of Hacienda Luisita's land was reclassified from agricultural to commercial and industrial zones.
Answer: True
In September 1995, a significant portion of Hacienda Luisita's land was reclassified from agricultural to commercial, industrial, and residential zones.
What percentage of Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (HLI) stock shares were initially allocated to farm workers under the SDO scheme?
Answer: 30 percent
Under the Stock Distribution Option (SDO), farm workers were allocated 30 percent of Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (HLI) stock shares.
When did the mandated ten-year period for land distribution at Hacienda Luisita conclude, leading farmers to organize for land advocacy?
Answer: 1967
The mandated ten-year period for land distribution concluded in 1967, prompting farmers to commence organizing for land advocacy.
Which of the following Executive Orders was NOT issued by President Corazón Aquino in 1987 concerning agrarian reform?
Answer: Republic Act No. 6657
Republic Act No. 6657, establishing the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL), was signed into law in 1988, not 1987. Executive Orders 228 and 229, along with Proclamation 131, were issued in 1987.
What is the common name for Republic Act No. 6657, which established a comprehensive agrarian reform program?
Answer: The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL)
Republic Act No. 6657 is commonly known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL).
How did the Stock Distribution Option (SDO) allow landowners to comply with agrarian reform obligations?
Answer: By distributing stock shares of the landholding company to farmers.
The Stock Distribution Option (SDO) provided landowners with a mechanism to fulfill agrarian reform obligations by distributing corporate shares rather than physical land parcels.
In the 1988 referendum concerning CARP implementation at Hacienda Luisita, what was the preference of the farm workers?
Answer: 92.9% voted in favor of the Stock Distribution Option (SDO).
The 1988 referendum indicated that 92.9% of farm workers favored the Stock Distribution Option (SDO), not direct land distribution.
What was the stock ownership division between the Cojuangco family and farm workers after the SDO agreement was implemented in May 1989?
Answer: Cojuangco group: 67%, Farm workers: 33%
After the SDO implementation in 1989, the Cojuangco group retained 67% of HLI stock shares, with farm workers holding 33%.
In September 1995, a significant portion of Hacienda Luisita's land was reclassified from agricultural to what other zones?
Answer: Commercial, industrial, and residential zones.
In September 1995, a significant portion of Hacienda Luisita's land was reclassified from agricultural to commercial, industrial, and residential zones.
In 1947, farmers at Hacienda Luisita protested by blocking rice trains after a Spanish director allegedly assaulted a farm worker.
Answer: False
The protest in 1947 involved farmers blocking sugar trains, not rice trains, following an alleged assault by a Spanish director.
In 1980, the government sued TADECO to distribute Hacienda Luisita, but TADECO claimed no farm workers were qualified to receive land.
Answer: True
The government initiated legal action against TADECO in 1980 to compel land distribution, with TADECO asserting that no farm workers were qualified.
The Manila Regional Trial Court ordered TADECO to distribute Hacienda Luisita in December 1985, a decision TADECO did not appeal.
Answer: False
The decision by the Manila Regional Trial Court ordering TADECO to distribute Hacienda Luisita was appealed by TADECO.
Hacienda workers petitioned for the revocation of the SDO agreement in 2003, citing improvements in their daily wages and workdays.
Answer: False
In 2003, hacienda workers petitioned for the revocation of the SDO agreement, citing the *lack* of improvements in their daily wages and workdays, not improvements.
What was the outcome of the legal case filed by the government against TADECO in December 1985 regarding Hacienda Luisita?
Answer: TADECO was ordered to surrender Hacienda Luisita for distribution.
In December 1985, the Manila Regional Trial Court ordered TADECO to surrender Hacienda Luisita to the Ministry of Agrarian Reform for distribution to qualified farm workers.
What was the primary reason cited by hacienda workers in 2003 for petitioning the DAR to revoke the SDO agreement?
Answer: The SDO had failed to improve their lives, citing low wages and limited workdays.
In 2003, hacienda workers petitioned for the revocation of the SDO agreement, citing the *lack* of improvements in their daily wages and workdays, not improvements.
What was the Department of Agrarian Reform's (DAR) decision regarding the SDO agreement in 2005?
Answer: The DAR cancelled the SDO agreement.
In 2005, the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) cancelled the Stock Distribution Option (SDO) agreement for Hacienda Luisita.
When was the agrarian land distribution process in Hacienda Luisita officially declared complete, with final certificates awarded?
Answer: 2018
The agrarian land distribution in Hacienda Luisita was officially declared complete in 2018, with the final certificates of land ownership award distributed in December of that year.
The Supreme Court's pivotal decision on July 5, 2011, regarding Hacienda Luisita:
Answer: Upheld the distribution of Hacienda Luisita's land to farm workers and revoked the SDO.
In its landmark decision on July 5, 2011, the Supreme Court upheld the distribution of Hacienda Luisita's land to farm workers and revoked the 1989 Stock Distribution Option (SDO) agreement.
Why did the Supreme Court modify its July 2011 ruling in November 2011 concerning farm workers' options?
Answer: To revoke the option for farm workers to remain as stockholders, ensuring effective control over lands.
The Supreme Court modified its ruling to revoke the option for farm workers to remain as stockholders, reasoning that this would prevent them from gaining effective control over the agricultural lands.
What was the core dispute regarding the compensation for Hacienda Luisita's land, specifically concerning the 'date of taking'?
Answer: HLI argued for a later date (Jan 2, 2006) for higher compensation, while the SC affirmed an earlier date (Nov 21, 1989).
The dispute centered on the 'date of taking'; HLI sought a later date (Jan 2, 2006) for higher compensation, whereas the Supreme Court affirmed an earlier date (Nov 21, 1989), significantly impacting the compensation value.
According to the Supreme Court's final ruling, how many hectares of Hacienda Luisita were to be redistributed, and what was the compensation per hectare for HLI?
Answer: 4,916 hectares; 40,000 pesos per hectare
The Supreme Court ruled for the redistribution of 4,916 hectares to farm-worker beneficiaries, with Hacienda Luisita Incorporated (HLI) to receive compensation of 40,000 pesos per hectare based on the 1989 valuation.
By what date had Hacienda Luisita fully complied with distributing sales shares to the farmers, as per the legal rulings?
Answer: July 4, 2018
Hacienda Luisita fully complied with distributing the sales shares to farmers as of July 4, 2018, fulfilling the legal mandates.
President Noynoy Aquino's agrarian reform initiatives included establishing programs for rural poverty reduction and credit support for farmer organizations.
Answer: True
President Noynoy Aquino prioritized the completion of CARP and implemented support programs such as those for rural poverty reduction and credit for farmer organizations.
Which of the following was a key initiative implemented by President Noynoy Aquino to advance agrarian reform?
Answer: Prioritizing the completion of CARP and establishing support programs.
President Noynoy Aquino prioritized the completion of CARP and implemented support programs such as those for rural poverty reduction and credit for farmer organizations.
What is a primary criticism directed at the Cojuangco family's ownership of Hacienda Luisita?
Answer: Their ownership exemplifies the issue of oligarchy in the Philippines.
A significant criticism is that the Cojuangco family's ownership of Hacienda Luisita exemplifies the issue of oligarchy in the Philippines, where a small group holds substantial economic and political power.