Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 7
Harmony Centre was officially founded on July 9, 2006.
Answer: False
Harmony Centre was officially founded on July 9, 2005, not 2006.
Harmony Centre emerged from the electoral alliance known as "For Human Rights in a United Latvia".
Answer: True
Harmony Centre was formed as a successor to the electoral alliance "For Human Rights in a United Latvia".
Over time, the initial five member parties of Harmony Centre merged into a single entity.
Answer: False
The initial five member parties underwent mergers, consolidating into two main entities: the Social Democratic Party "Harmony" and the Socialist Party, rather than a single entity.
When was Harmony Centre officially founded?
Answer: July 9, 2005
Harmony Centre was officially founded on July 9, 2005.
Which of these was NOT an initial member party of Harmony Centre?
Answer: Social Democratic Party "Harmony"
The Social Democratic Party "Harmony" was formed through mergers of initial member parties, but it was not one of the original five founding parties of Harmony Centre.
How did the initial five member parties of Harmony Centre evolve over time?
Answer: They were consolidated into two main entities: the Social Democratic Party "Harmony" and the Socialist Party.
The initial five member parties of Harmony Centre underwent a process of consolidation, eventually merging into two primary entities: the Social Democratic Party "Harmony" and the Socialist Party.
What was the purpose of the "Equal Rights" party within the "For Human Rights in a United Latvia" alliance?
Answer: To advocate for the interests of the Russian minority and the Russian language.
The "Equal Rights" party within the "For Human Rights in a United Latvia" alliance was established to advocate for the interests of the Russian minority and the Russian language.
Harmony Centre was a political alliance primarily focused on conservative policies in Latvia.
Answer: False
Harmony Centre was a social-democratic political alliance, not one focused on conservative policies. Its platform emphasized centre-left and left-wing viewpoints.
Harmony Centre's primary ideological orientation was social-democratic, encompassing centre-left and left-wing viewpoints.
Answer: True
The alliance identified its primary ideological orientation as social-democratic, encompassing a spectrum of centre-left and left-wing political perspectives.
Besides its social-democratic stance, Harmony Centre focused on representing the interests of ethnic Latvians and promoting national unity.
Answer: False
Contrary to focusing on ethnic Latvians, Harmony Centre primarily represented the interests of the Russian minority and engaged in minority politics.
Harmony Centre was generally considered to be centre-right on the political spectrum.
Answer: False
Harmony Centre was generally considered to be centre-left to left-wing on the political spectrum.
Upon formation, Harmony Centre aimed to consolidate Latvian centre-left forces and promote amity between Latvians and Russians.
Answer: True
A primary objective upon formation was to consolidate Latvian centre-left political forces and foster amity between the Latvian and Russian populations.
Harmony Centre advocated for reduced social spending to stimulate the Latvian economy.
Answer: False
Harmony Centre advocated for increased social spending as a strategy to stimulate the economy, rather than reduced spending.
Harmony Centre's primary ideological orientation was described as:
Answer: Social-democratic
Harmony Centre identified its primary ideological orientation as social-democratic.
Besides its social-democratic stance, what other political interests did Harmony Centre aim to represent?
Answer: The interests of the Russian minority and minority politics.
In addition to its social-democratic platform, Harmony Centre focused on representing the interests of the Russian minority in Latvia.
What was a primary goal of Harmony Centre upon its formation?
Answer: To consolidate Latvian centre-left forces and promote amity between Latvians and Russians.
A key objective upon its formation was to consolidate Latvian centre-left political forces and to foster amity between the Latvian and Russian populations.
Harmony Centre's general economic policy position was to:
Answer: Advocate for increased social spending to stimulate the economy.
Harmony Centre's economic policy advocated for increased social spending as a means to stimulate the economy and improve overall welfare.
What was the significance of promoting "Latvian-Russian amity" for Harmony Centre?
Answer: It highlighted the goal of fostering better relations between ethnic Latvians and Russians.
The promotion of "Latvian-Russian amity" underscored Harmony Centre's objective to foster improved relations and understanding between Latvia's ethnic Latvian and Russian populations.
Sergey Dolgopolov, leader of the Socialist Party of Latvia, is credited as the founder of Harmony Centre.
Answer: False
Sergey Dolgopolov, leader of the New Centre party, is credited as the founder of Harmony Centre, not a leader of the Socialist Party of Latvia.
Nils Ušakovs served as the first chairman of Harmony Centre.
Answer: False
Sergey Dolgopolov served as the first chairman of Harmony Centre; Nils Ušakovs later became a prominent leader.
Who is credited as the founder of Harmony Centre?
Answer: Sergey Dolgopolov, head of the New Centre party
Sergey Dolgopolov, the leader of the New Centre party, is credited as the founder of Harmony Centre.
Who were the key leaders associated with Harmony Centre?
Answer: Sergey Dolgopolov, Nils Ušakovs, Jānis Urbanovičs
Prominent leaders associated with Harmony Centre included its founder Sergey Dolgopolov, Nils Ušakovs, and Jānis Urbanovičs.
Which party leader served as the first chairman of Harmony Centre?
Answer: Sergey Dolgopolov
Sergey Dolgopolov, leader of the New Centre party, served as the first chairman of Harmony Centre.
In the 2006 Latvian parliamentary election, Harmony Centre secured 17 seats and ranked fourth.
Answer: True
Harmony Centre achieved a significant electoral result in the 2006 parliamentary election, securing 17 seats and ranking fourth.
Harmony Centre's electoral performance significantly improved in the 2010 election, winning 29 seats and placing second.
Answer: True
The 2010 election marked a substantial improvement for Harmony Centre, as it won 29 seats and secured second place in the parliamentary rankings.
In the 2011 Latvian parliamentary election, Harmony Centre became the leading party with 31 seats but remained in opposition.
Answer: True
Harmony Centre emerged as the leading party in the 2011 parliamentary election, securing 31 seats, yet it continued to operate in opposition.
Harmony Centre maintained its position as the leading party in the 2014 election but was included in the government coalition.
Answer: False
While Harmony Centre remained the leading party in the 2014 election, it was excluded from the government coalition.
Harmony Centre participated in the 2009 European Parliament election, winning 2 out of Latvia's 8 seats.
Answer: True
In the 2009 European Parliament election, Harmony Centre secured 2 of Latvia's 8 allocated seats.
How many seats did Harmony Centre secure in the 2006 Latvian parliamentary election?
Answer: 17 seats
In the 2006 Latvian parliamentary election, Harmony Centre secured a total of 17 seats.
In the 2010 Latvian parliamentary election, Harmony Centre achieved which result?
Answer: Ranked second with 26.61% of the vote and 29 seats.
The 2010 Latvian parliamentary election saw Harmony Centre achieve a significant improvement, ranking second with 26.61% of the vote and winning 29 seats.
What was Harmony Centre's electoral outcome in the 2011 Latvian parliamentary election?
Answer: Secured 31 seats, making it the leading party, but it remained in opposition.
In the 2011 Latvian parliamentary election, Harmony Centre secured 31 seats, becoming the leading party, although it remained in opposition.
How many seats did Harmony Centre hold in the 11th Saeima?
Answer: 31 seats
Harmony Centre held 31 seats in the 11th Saeima.
In the 2018 Latvian parliamentary election, Harmony Centre's performance was characterized by:
Answer: Receiving the most votes but being excluded from the governing coalition.
In the 2018 Latvian parliamentary election, Harmony Centre received the most votes but was ultimately excluded from the governing coalition.
Harmony Centre was excluded from government coalitions primarily due to its strong stance against minority rights.
Answer: False
Harmony Centre's exclusion from government coalitions was primarily attributed to its stances on sensitive national issues and its ties with United Russia, not an opposition to minority rights.
Key leaders of Harmony Centre, including Jānis Urbanovičs, labeled the 1940 Soviet presence in Latvia as an "occupation".
Answer: False
Key leaders, including Jānis Urbanovičs, avoided labeling the 1940 Soviet presence as an "occupation," preferring the term "annexation."
Nils Ušakovs stated that Latvia had been forcibly annexed by the Soviet Union.
Answer: True
Nils Ušakovs articulated that Latvia had been forcibly annexed by the Soviet Union.
Jānis Urbanovičs believed that Soviet forces were still present in Latvia.
Answer: False
Jānis Urbanovičs stated that "there were occupations in Latvia, there are no occupants," indicating a belief that Soviet forces were no longer present.
Harmony Centre leaders proposed postponing debates on national and historical issues to prioritize economic and social problems.
Answer: True
Harmony Centre leaders suggested deferring discussions on national and historical matters to focus on addressing pressing economic and social challenges.
Alfrēds Rubiks, an MEP for Harmony Centre, recognized Latvia's occupation by the Soviet Union.
Answer: False
Alfrēds Rubiks, an MEP for Harmony Centre, explicitly stated he never recognized Latvia's occupation by the Soviet Union.
Jānis Urbanovičs attributed the Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine to Western attempts to disrupt Russian plans for an Eurasian Customs Union.
Answer: True
Jānis Urbanovičs attributed the Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine to Western efforts aimed at disrupting Russian plans for an Eurasian Customs Union.
Nils Ušakovs criticized the EU sanctions against Russia, deeming them ineffective and harmful to the Latvian economy.
Answer: True
Nils Ušakovs expressed criticism of the EU sanctions against Russia, characterizing them as ineffective and detrimental to the Latvian economy.
Harmony Centre deputies voted in favor of a resolution condemning Russia's actions in Ukraine in March 2014.
Answer: False
In March 2014, 28 deputies from Harmony Centre voted against a Saeima resolution that condemned Russia's actions in Ukraine.
Which of the following was a primary reason cited for Harmony Centre's exclusion from government coalitions?
Answer: Its stances on sensitive national issues and ties with United Russia.
Harmony Centre was frequently excluded from government coalitions due to its positions on sensitive national issues and its connections with United Russia.
How did key Harmony Centre leaders, like Jānis Urbanovičs, characterize the 1940 Soviet presence in Latvia?
Answer: They avoided labeling it an "occupation," preferring "annexation."
Key leaders, including Jānis Urbanovičs, characterized the 1940 Soviet presence in Latvia not as an "occupation" but as an "annexation."
What was Nils Ušakovs' stance on the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation?
Answer: He expressed support for Ukraine's territorial integrity, including Crimea.
Nils Ušakovs expressed his support for Ukraine's territorial integrity, which explicitly included Crimea.
What was Nils Ušakovs' opinion on the EU sanctions against Russia?
Answer: He criticized them as ineffective and harmful to the Latvian economy.
Nils Ušakovs voiced criticism regarding the EU sanctions against Russia, deeming them ineffective and detrimental to the Latvian economy.
How did Harmony Centre deputies vote on a resolution condemning Russia's actions in Ukraine in March 2014?
Answer: 28 deputies voted against the resolution.
In March 2014, 28 deputies affiliated with Harmony Centre voted against a Saeima resolution condemning Russia's actions in Ukraine.
What precedent did Jānis Urbanovičs cite regarding Russia's actions in Crimea?
Answer: The Abrene County precedent.
Jānis Urbanovičs cited the historical Abrene County precedent when discussing Russia's actions in Crimea.
Harmony Centre was dissolved in 2014.
Answer: True
The political alliance Harmony Centre officially ceased operations and was dissolved in 2014.
The National Democratic Party succeeded Harmony Centre after its dissolution.
Answer: False
The Social Democratic Party "Harmony" succeeded Harmony Centre after its dissolution, not the National Democratic Party.
When was Harmony Centre officially dissolved?
Answer: 2014
Harmony Centre officially ceased its operations and was dissolved in the year 2014.
What political entity succeeded Harmony Centre after its dissolution?
Answer: The Social Democratic Party "Harmony"
Following the dissolution of Harmony Centre, the Social Democratic Party "Harmony" emerged as its successor entity.
The Latvian name for Harmony Centre was "Saskaņas Centrs".
Answer: True
The political alliance known in English as Harmony Centre was officially named Saskaņas Centrs in Latvian.
The official slogan of Harmony Centre was "A decent life for everyone."
Answer: True
The adopted slogan for Harmony Centre was "A decent life for everyone."
Harmony Centre's headquarters were located in Ventspils, Latvia.
Answer: False
Harmony Centre's headquarters were located in Riga, Latvia.
What was Harmony Centre?
Answer: A social-democratic political alliance in Latvia.
Harmony Centre was a significant political alliance in Latvia, characterized by its social-democratic ideology and focus on representing minority interests.
Which of the following was the Latvian name for Harmony Centre?
Answer: Saskaņas Centrs
The official Latvian designation for Harmony Centre was Saskaņas Centrs.
What was the official slogan of Harmony Centre?
Answer: "A decent life for everyone."
The official slogan adopted by Harmony Centre was "A decent life for everyone."
Where was Harmony Centre headquartered?
Answer: Riga, Latvia
Harmony Centre maintained its headquarters in Riga, Latvia.
What does the term "catch-all" imply about Harmony Centre's political strategy?
Answer: It aimed to attract a diverse electorate by appealing broadly.
The designation "catch-all" implies that Harmony Centre employed a political strategy aimed at attracting a broad and diverse electorate.