Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


Understanding Internet Censorship: Concepts, Methods, and Global Impact

At a Glance

Title: Understanding Internet Censorship: Concepts, Methods, and Global Impact

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Foundations of Internet Censorship: 3 flashcards, 5 questions
  • Motivations and Justifications for Censorship: 7 flashcards, 11 questions
  • Technical Mechanisms of Internet Control: 11 flashcards, 16 questions
  • Non-Technical and Social Control Mechanisms: 16 flashcards, 24 questions
  • Circumvention Strategies and User Resilience: 9 flashcards, 16 questions
  • Global Landscape, Monitoring, and Emerging Concepts: 36 flashcards, 45 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 82
  • True/False Questions: 68
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 49
  • Total Questions: 117

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Understanding Internet Censorship: Concepts, Methods, and Global Impact

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Internet censorship" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Understanding Internet Censorship: Concepts, Methods, and Global Impact

Study Guide: Understanding Internet Censorship: Concepts, Methods, and Global Impact

Foundations of Internet Censorship

Internet censorship is exclusively defined as the suppression of content hosted within a state's own borders.

Answer: False

The definition of internet censorship extends beyond content hosted solely within a state's borders, encompassing the control or suppression of information accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet, which may include resources located outside the censoring state's jurisdiction.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.
  • What fundamental challenge do censors face due to the internet's distributed nature, and what technical solutions are required?: Censors face the challenge of controlling information hosted outside their physical or legal jurisdiction. This necessitates the use of technical methods like site blocking and content filtering, which are specific to the internet's architecture, to prevent access to external resources.

The internet's distributed nature poses no significant challenge to censors attempting to control information.

Answer: False

The distributed architecture of the internet presents a significant challenge to censors, particularly concerning information hosted outside their direct jurisdiction, necessitating complex technical interventions.

Related Concepts:

  • How has the perception of internet censorship feasibility evolved with technological advancements?: Early perceptions, like John Gilmore's 1993 quote that 'The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it,' suggested censorship was inherently difficult. However, later reports, like one from the Oxford Internet Institute for UNESCO in 2011, concluded that controlling information online is feasible, and technological progress does not automatically guarantee greater freedom of speech.

John Gilmore's 1993 perspective suggested that internet censorship was inherently difficult and the network would naturally circumvent it.

Answer: True

John Gilmore's early perspective posited that the internet's design inherently resisted censorship, suggesting it would naturally route around such impediments.

Related Concepts:

  • How has the perception of internet censorship feasibility evolved with technological advancements?: Early perceptions, like John Gilmore's 1993 quote that 'The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it,' suggested censorship was inherently difficult. However, later reports, like one from the Oxford Internet Institute for UNESCO in 2011, concluded that controlling information online is feasible, and technological progress does not automatically guarantee greater freedom of speech.

According to the source material, what is the fundamental definition of internet censorship?

Answer: The legal control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet.

Internet censorship is fundamentally defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This definition encompasses various forms of restriction imposed by authorities or entities.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.

What fundamental challenge does the internet's distributed nature present to censors?

Answer: It makes controlling information hosted outside their jurisdiction difficult.

The distributed architecture of the internet poses a significant challenge for censors, primarily by complicating the control of information hosted beyond their immediate geographical or legal jurisdiction.

Related Concepts:

  • What fundamental challenge do censors face due to the internet's distributed nature, and what technical solutions are required?: Censors face the challenge of controlling information hosted outside their physical or legal jurisdiction. This necessitates the use of technical methods like site blocking and content filtering, which are specific to the internet's architecture, to prevent access to external resources.

Motivations and Justifications for Censorship

Self-censorship is primarily motivated by a desire to increase online visibility.

Answer: False

Self-censorship is typically motivated by factors such as fear of legal repercussions, moral or religious considerations, or the desire to conform to societal norms, rather than a primary aim to increase online visibility.

Related Concepts:

  • What is self-censorship, and what are some common motivations behind it?: Self-censorship occurs when individuals or organizations refrain from publishing or sharing certain material for various reasons. Motivations can include moral, religious, or business considerations, the desire to conform to societal norms or political views, or fear of legal repercussions or other consequences.

Governments never use claims like copyright infringement or defamation as justifications for suppressing online content.

Answer: False

Governments and other entities frequently utilize claims such as copyright infringement, defamation, and obscenity as justifications for suppressing or removing online content.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some of the legal or quasi-legal justifications used to deliberately suppress online content?: Governments and other entities may use claims related to copyrights, defamation, harassment, and obscenity as justifications to deliberately suppress or remove online content. These claims can be used to target specific information or viewpoints.

Protecting existing economic interests is a recognized motive for implementing internet filtering.

Answer: True

Protecting established economic interests, such as blocking competing services or preserving market monopolies, is indeed a recognized motive for implementing internet filtering and censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary motives or rationales behind internet filtering?: The primary motives for internet filtering are typically related to politics and power, social norms and morals, and security concerns. Additionally, protecting existing economic interests has emerged as another significant reason for implementing such filtering.
  • How are existing economic interests sometimes protected through internet censorship?: Existing economic interests can be protected by blocking new internet services that threaten established industries, such as low-cost Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services that compete with traditional telecommunications companies, especially those with government ties or monopoly positions.
  • What are common security-related justifications for internet filtering?: Security concerns often drive internet filtering, with governments aiming to block websites associated with insurgents, extremists, and terrorists to protect national security. Filtering is also used as part of a 'defense in depth' strategy to protect networks from malware and prevent reputational damage from misuse.

Internet controls are typically associated with democratic systems to ensure fair elections.

Answer: False

Pervasive internet controls and censorship are more commonly associated with authoritarian regimes, often employed to suppress dissent and maintain political power, rather than with democratic systems aiming for fair elections.

Related Concepts:

  • How is internet control related to a country's political system?: Internet controls and censorship, particularly when directed at political opposition, are often associated with higher levels of authoritarianism. Pervasive internet control and more subtle influence operations are common strategies in such regimes.

Content related to minority or religious groups challenging the ruling regime is rarely targeted for political censorship.

Answer: False

Content associated with minority or religious groups that challenge ruling regimes is frequently targeted for political censorship, alongside other politically sensitive topics.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of websites or content are commonly targeted for censorship due to political reasons?: Politically targeted content includes opposition blogs and websites, sites related to minority or religious groups that challenge the ruling regime (like Falun Gong in China or Tibetan exile groups), sites commenting on LGBTQ+ issues, and content deemed offensive to a sovereign or state (lèse-majesté).

Security concerns are never used as a justification for internet filtering.

Answer: False

Security concerns, such as blocking websites associated with extremist groups or protecting national infrastructure from cyber threats, are frequently cited as justifications for implementing internet filtering.

Related Concepts:

  • What are common security-related justifications for internet filtering?: Security concerns often drive internet filtering, with governments aiming to block websites associated with insurgents, extremists, and terrorists to protect national security. Filtering is also used as part of a 'defense in depth' strategy to protect networks from malware and prevent reputational damage from misuse.

What is a common motivation for self-censorship mentioned in the text?

Answer: Fear of legal repercussions or other consequences.

Self-censorship is often motivated by apprehension regarding potential legal consequences, societal backlash, or other adverse outcomes associated with publishing certain information.

Related Concepts:

  • What is self-censorship, and what are some common motivations behind it?: Self-censorship occurs when individuals or organizations refrain from publishing or sharing certain material for various reasons. Motivations can include moral, religious, or business considerations, the desire to conform to societal norms or political views, or fear of legal repercussions or other consequences.

Which of the following is cited as a legal or quasi-legal justification used to suppress online content?

Answer: Copyright infringement claims.

Claims related to copyright infringement, defamation, and obscenity are frequently employed as legal or quasi-legal justifications for the suppression or removal of online content.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some of the legal or quasi-legal justifications used to deliberately suppress online content?: Governments and other entities may use claims related to copyrights, defamation, harassment, and obscenity as justifications to deliberately suppress or remove online content. These claims can be used to target specific information or viewpoints.
  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.

Which of the following is identified as a primary motive for internet filtering?

Answer: Protecting existing economic interests.

Protecting existing economic interests, such as safeguarding established industries from disruptive new online services, is recognized as a significant motive behind the implementation of internet filtering.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary motives or rationales behind internet filtering?: The primary motives for internet filtering are typically related to politics and power, social norms and morals, and security concerns. Additionally, protecting existing economic interests has emerged as another significant reason for implementing such filtering.
  • What are common security-related justifications for internet filtering?: Security concerns often drive internet filtering, with governments aiming to block websites associated with insurgents, extremists, and terrorists to protect national security. Filtering is also used as part of a 'defense in depth' strategy to protect networks from malware and prevent reputational damage from misuse.

Internet controls and censorship are often associated with which type of political system?

Answer: Authoritarian regimes

Extensive internet controls and censorship are frequently characteristic of authoritarian regimes, where they are employed as tools to suppress dissent and maintain political stability.

Related Concepts:

  • How is internet control related to a country's political system?: Internet controls and censorship, particularly when directed at political opposition, are often associated with higher levels of authoritarianism. Pervasive internet control and more subtle influence operations are common strategies in such regimes.
  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.

Common security-related justifications for internet filtering include:

Answer: Blocking websites associated with insurgents, extremists, or terrorists.

Security concerns frequently serve as a justification for internet filtering, particularly in efforts to block access to websites linked to extremist ideologies or terrorist activities, thereby safeguarding national security.

Related Concepts:

  • What are common security-related justifications for internet filtering?: Security concerns often drive internet filtering, with governments aiming to block websites associated with insurgents, extremists, and terrorists to protect national security. Filtering is also used as part of a 'defense in depth' strategy to protect networks from malware and prevent reputational damage from misuse.
  • What are the primary motives or rationales behind internet filtering?: The primary motives for internet filtering are typically related to politics and power, social norms and morals, and security concerns. Additionally, protecting existing economic interests has emerged as another significant reason for implementing such filtering.

Technical Mechanisms of Internet Control

Packet filtering involves inspecting data packets for specific keywords to block content.

Answer: True

Packet filtering is a technique used in internet censorship that involves inspecting data packets, particularly TCP packets, for specific keywords or patterns to determine whether to terminate the transmission.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the mechanism of packet filtering in internet censorship.: Packet filtering works by inspecting data packets, specifically TCP packets, and terminating the transmission if certain keywords are detected. This can affect various TCP-based protocols, and users can attempt to bypass it by using encrypted connections or adjusting their network stack's Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) or Maximum Segment Size (MSS).
  • What are some technical methods used for blocking or filtering internet content?: Technical methods for blocking or filtering internet content include DNS spoofing, blocking access to specific IP addresses, filtering URLs based on keywords, inspecting packets for content, and resetting TCP connections.

Internet censorship enforcement can only occur at the Internet Service Provider (ISP) level.

Answer: False

Internet censorship enforcement can occur at multiple levels within a country's infrastructure, including ISPs, institutional networks, application service providers, and even individual devices.

Related Concepts:

  • At what levels can internet censorship enforcement be applied within a country's infrastructure?: Enforcement of censorship technologies can occur at multiple levels, including the internet backbone (like IXPs), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), individual institutions (schools, libraries), personal devices (via pre-installed software), application service providers (like social media companies), certificate authorities, and Content Delivery Networks (CDNs).
  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.
  • What fundamental challenge do censors face due to the internet's distributed nature, and what technical solutions are required?: Censors face the challenge of controlling information hosted outside their physical or legal jurisdiction. This necessitates the use of technical methods like site blocking and content filtering, which are specific to the internet's architecture, to prevent access to external resources.

IP address blocking is a censorship method that exclusively affects HTTP traffic.

Answer: False

IP address blocking can affect various IP-based protocols, not exclusively HTTP traffic. If a website shares an IP address with other services, blocking that IP can inadvertently affect unrelated content.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the concept of IP address blocking as a censorship method.: IP address blocking involves denying access to a specific IP address. If a website is hosted on a shared server, this method can inadvertently block all websites on that server, affecting various IP-based protocols like HTTP and FTP. Geo-blocking is often implemented using this technique.
  • How has the widespread adoption of HTTPS affected internet censorship capabilities?: The widespread adoption of HTTPS has limited censors' options, often forcing them into a binary choice of blocking all content or none of it, as the encryption obscures the specific content being accessed. However, the domain name itself often remains unencrypted in the TLS handshake, providing a potential point for filtering.
  • What are some technical methods used for blocking or filtering internet content?: Technical methods for blocking or filtering internet content include DNS spoofing, blocking access to specific IP addresses, filtering URLs based on keywords, inspecting packets for content, and resetting TCP connections.

DNS filtering works by preventing the translation of domain names into IP addresses.

Answer: True

DNS filtering interferes with the Domain Name System resolution process, either by preventing the translation of domain names into IP addresses or by redirecting the request to an incorrect IP address.

Related Concepts:

  • How does DNS filtering and redirection work as a censorship technique?: DNS filtering and redirection interfere with the Domain Name System (DNS) resolution process. Connections to blocked domain names are either not resolved, or an incorrect IP address is provided, often through DNS hijacking, thereby preventing access to the intended website.

URL filtering relies on blocking specific IP addresses associated with undesirable websites.

Answer: False

URL filtering operates by scanning the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) string for specific keywords, irrespective of the associated IP address. Blocking IP addresses is a distinct censorship method.

Related Concepts:

  • What is URL filtering, and what are common methods used to circumvent it?: URL filtering involves scanning Uniform Resource Locator (URL) strings for specific keywords, regardless of the domain name. Circumvention methods include using escaped characters within the URL or employing encrypted protocols like VPNs and TLS/SSL to obscure the content.
  • What are some technical methods used for blocking or filtering internet content?: Technical methods for blocking or filtering internet content include DNS spoofing, blocking access to specific IP addresses, filtering URLs based on keywords, inspecting packets for content, and resetting TCP connections.

A connection reset in censorship involves sending packets to terminate a TCP connection when specific content is detected.

Answer: True

A connection reset is a censorship technique where a firewall intercepts traffic, detects specific content, and sends TCP reset packets to terminate the connection between the user and the server.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'connection reset' in the context of internet censorship, and how can it be circumvented?: A connection reset occurs when a firewall blocks a TCP connection and then sends reset packets to both ends, potentially blocking future attempts from other users routed through the same point. Users can attempt to circumvent this by ignoring the reset packets sent by the firewall.
  • What is network disconnection as a censorship method, and what is one circumvention technique?: Network disconnection is a simpler censorship method involving the complete shutdown of internet routers, either through software commands or physical means like turning off equipment or unplugging cables. Using a satellite ISP can be a way to circumvent such widespread disconnections.
  • Describe the mechanism of packet filtering in internet censorship.: Packet filtering works by inspecting data packets, specifically TCP packets, and terminating the transmission if certain keywords are detected. This can affect various TCP-based protocols, and users can attempt to bypass it by using encrypted connections or adjusting their network stack's Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) or Maximum Segment Size (MSS).

Network disconnection is a complex censorship method requiring sophisticated technical infrastructure.

Answer: False

Network disconnection, such as shutting down routers or unplugging cables, is a relatively straightforward censorship method that does not necessarily require highly sophisticated technical infrastructure.

Related Concepts:

  • What is network disconnection as a censorship method, and what is one circumvention technique?: Network disconnection is a simpler censorship method involving the complete shutdown of internet routers, either through software commands or physical means like turning off equipment or unplugging cables. Using a satellite ISP can be a way to circumvent such widespread disconnections.

Over-blocking occurs when censorship fails to block all intended content.

Answer: False

Over-blocking refers to censorship measures that inadvertently block legitimate or permissible content in addition to the targeted material. The failure to block all intended content is termed under-blocking.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference between 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship measures block more content than intended, including legitimate material. Under-blocking happens when censorship measures fail to block all of the targeted content, allowing some access.
  • What is the difference between 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship measures block more content than intended, including legitimate material. Under-blocking happens when censorship measures fail to block all of the targeted content, allowing some access.
  • What are the issues of 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship techniques inadvertently block legitimate or permissible content along with the targeted material, while under-blocking happens when censorship methods fail to block all of the intended content. These issues arise because it's difficult to achieve precise targeting without collateral effects.

'Over-blocking' refers to censorship measures failing to block all targeted content.

Answer: False

Over-blocking describes censorship that blocks more content than intended, including legitimate material. The failure to block all targeted content is known as under-blocking.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference between 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship measures block more content than intended, including legitimate material. Under-blocking happens when censorship measures fail to block all of the targeted content, allowing some access.
  • What is the difference between 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship measures block more content than intended, including legitimate material. Under-blocking happens when censorship measures fail to block all of the targeted content, allowing some access.
  • What are the issues of 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship techniques inadvertently block legitimate or permissible content along with the targeted material, while under-blocking happens when censorship methods fail to block all of the intended content. These issues arise because it's difficult to achieve precise targeting without collateral effects.

Which technical method involves interfering with the Domain Name System (DNS) resolution process?

Answer: DNS filtering and redirection

DNS filtering and redirection directly interfere with the Domain Name System (DNS) resolution process, either by preventing domain name translation or by redirecting users to unintended IP addresses.

Related Concepts:

  • How does DNS filtering and redirection work as a censorship technique?: DNS filtering and redirection interfere with the Domain Name System (DNS) resolution process. Connections to blocked domain names are either not resolved, or an incorrect IP address is provided, often through DNS hijacking, thereby preventing access to the intended website.

Enforcement of internet censorship technologies can occur at multiple levels. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a level of enforcement?

Answer: International Telecommunication Union (ITU) headquarters

While enforcement occurs at levels such as ISPs, individual devices, and application service providers, the ITU headquarters is an international body and not a direct enforcement point for national censorship technologies.

Related Concepts:

  • At what levels can internet censorship enforcement be applied within a country's infrastructure?: Enforcement of censorship technologies can occur at multiple levels, including the internet backbone (like IXPs), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), individual institutions (schools, libraries), personal devices (via pre-installed software), application service providers (like social media companies), certificate authorities, and Content Delivery Networks (CDNs).
  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.
  • What are some non-technical methods of internet censorship that mirror traditional media censorship?: Non-technical censorship methods include enacting laws and regulations to prohibit content, issuing formal or informal requests for content removal, accepting bribes to slant information, arresting or prosecuting publishers and ISPs, confiscating equipment, closing businesses, boycotting, and even resorting to threats or violence against individuals involved in online content creation.

What is the primary mechanism of IP address blocking as a censorship method?

Answer: Denying access to a specific IP address.

IP address blocking functions by denying network access to a particular IP address, thereby preventing communication with any services hosted at that address.

Related Concepts:

  • At what levels can internet censorship enforcement be applied within a country's infrastructure?: Enforcement of censorship technologies can occur at multiple levels, including the internet backbone (like IXPs), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), individual institutions (schools, libraries), personal devices (via pre-installed software), application service providers (like social media companies), certificate authorities, and Content Delivery Networks (CDNs).
  • What is network disconnection as a censorship method, and what is one circumvention technique?: Network disconnection is a simpler censorship method involving the complete shutdown of internet routers, either through software commands or physical means like turning off equipment or unplugging cables. Using a satellite ISP can be a way to circumvent such widespread disconnections.
  • What are some technical methods used for blocking or filtering internet content?: Technical methods for blocking or filtering internet content include DNS spoofing, blocking access to specific IP addresses, filtering URLs based on keywords, inspecting packets for content, and resetting TCP connections.

How does URL filtering work?

Answer: By scanning Uniform Resource Locator (URL) strings for keywords.

URL filtering operates by examining the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) string for specific keywords or patterns to determine whether to permit or block access to the requested resource.

Related Concepts:

  • What is URL filtering, and what are common methods used to circumvent it?: URL filtering involves scanning Uniform Resource Locator (URL) strings for specific keywords, regardless of the domain name. Circumvention methods include using escaped characters within the URL or employing encrypted protocols like VPNs and TLS/SSL to obscure the content.

What happens during a 'connection reset' in the context of internet censorship?

Answer: A firewall blocks a TCP connection and sends reset packets.

During a connection reset in censorship, a firewall interrupts a TCP connection and transmits reset packets to both endpoints, effectively terminating the communication session.

Related Concepts:

  • What is network disconnection as a censorship method, and what is one circumvention technique?: Network disconnection is a simpler censorship method involving the complete shutdown of internet routers, either through software commands or physical means like turning off equipment or unplugging cables. Using a satellite ISP can be a way to circumvent such widespread disconnections.
  • What is a 'connection reset' in the context of internet censorship, and how can it be circumvented?: A connection reset occurs when a firewall blocks a TCP connection and then sends reset packets to both ends, potentially blocking future attempts from other users routed through the same point. Users can attempt to circumvent this by ignoring the reset packets sent by the firewall.

Which of the following is a method of network disconnection used for censorship?

Answer: Physically turning off internet routers.

Physically disabling or shutting down internet routers is a direct method of network disconnection employed for censorship purposes.

Related Concepts:

  • What is network disconnection as a censorship method, and what is one circumvention technique?: Network disconnection is a simpler censorship method involving the complete shutdown of internet routers, either through software commands or physical means like turning off equipment or unplugging cables. Using a satellite ISP can be a way to circumvent such widespread disconnections.
  • What are some technical methods used for blocking or filtering internet content?: Technical methods for blocking or filtering internet content include DNS spoofing, blocking access to specific IP addresses, filtering URLs based on keywords, inspecting packets for content, and resetting TCP connections.

What is 'under-blocking' in the context of internet censorship?

Answer: Blocking only a small portion of the intended content.

Under-blocking refers to the situation where censorship measures are insufficient and fail to block all of the content that was intended to be restricted.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference between 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship measures block more content than intended, including legitimate material. Under-blocking happens when censorship measures fail to block all of the targeted content, allowing some access.
  • What is the difference between 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship measures block more content than intended, including legitimate material. Under-blocking happens when censorship measures fail to block all of the targeted content, allowing some access.
  • What are the issues of 'over-blocking' and 'under-blocking' in internet censorship?: Over-blocking occurs when censorship techniques inadvertently block legitimate or permissible content along with the targeted material, while under-blocking happens when censorship methods fail to block all of the intended content. These issues arise because it's difficult to achieve precise targeting without collateral effects.

Non-Technical and Social Control Mechanisms

Schools and libraries may implement content restrictions, viewing these actions as ethical rather than censorship.

Answer: True

Institutions such as schools and libraries may implement content restrictions, often framing these actions as ethical measures to protect users or maintain an appropriate environment, rather than as censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond state-mandated control, what other entities might implement internet access restrictions, and how do they view this action?: Organizations that provide internet access, such as schools and libraries, may choose to restrict access to material they deem undesirable, offensive, age-inappropriate, or illegal. They often consider these restrictions ethical behavior rather than censorship.
  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.

Portal censorship and search result removal make websites more visible to users.

Answer: False

Portal censorship and the removal of websites from search engine results render those sites less visible, often making them effectively invisible to users who are unaware of their existence.

Related Concepts:

  • How can portal censorship and search result removal impact a website's visibility?: Major portals and search engines can choose to exclude specific websites from their listings, rendering them invisible to users who are unaware of their existence. This practice, sometimes done to comply with legal requirements (like Google's compliance with German and French law regarding Neo-Nazi content), has a similar effect to direct censorship.

Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks are primarily used by state actors to permanently block websites.

Answer: False

Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks are typically used to disrupt services temporarily by overwhelming a target system, and they are not exclusively employed by state actors nor are they primarily for permanent website blocking.

Related Concepts:

  • What are denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, and how are they used in relation to internet censorship?: Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks are computer network attacks designed to disrupt services by overwhelming a target system. They can be used to prevent or limit access to websites or online services, similar to blocking techniques, although typically only for a limited duration, and are often employed by non-state actors.

Commercial filtering software is exclusively used for personal use and never by governments for censorship.

Answer: False

Commercial filtering software is utilized by governments for censorship purposes, in addition to personal use. Vendors sell these products globally, which can be repurposed for state-sponsored content control.

Related Concepts:

  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What concerns have been raised regarding the role of commercial filtering software vendors in censorship?: Concerns exist that commercial filtering software vendors may be complicit in censorship by selling products to repressive governments. Additionally, regulations and oversight for these vendors are often lacking, and they may protect their blocking categories as intellectual property, effectively outsourcing content decisions to them.

Concerns about commercial filtering software vendors include their potential complicity with repressive governments.

Answer: True

A significant concern regarding commercial filtering software vendors is their potential complicity in censorship through the sale of their products to repressive regimes, thereby enabling state control over information.

Related Concepts:

  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What concerns have been raised regarding the role of commercial filtering software vendors in censorship?: Concerns exist that commercial filtering software vendors may be complicit in censorship by selling products to repressive governments. Additionally, regulations and oversight for these vendors are often lacking, and they may protect their blocking categories as intellectual property, effectively outsourcing content decisions to them.

Non-technical censorship methods only involve enacting laws and regulations.

Answer: False

Non-technical censorship methods encompass a broader range of actions beyond laws and regulations, including threats, confiscation of equipment, arrests, and physical intimidation of publishers and service providers.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some non-technical methods of internet censorship that mirror traditional media censorship?: Non-technical censorship methods include enacting laws and regulations to prohibit content, issuing formal or informal requests for content removal, accepting bribes to slant information, arresting or prosecuting publishers and ISPs, confiscating equipment, closing businesses, boycotting, and even resorting to threats or violence against individuals involved in online content creation.
  • What are some examples of non-technical censorship methods used against internet publishers?: Non-technical censorship methods include legal prohibitions on content, requests for removal, arrests, civil lawsuits, confiscation of equipment, business closures, boycotts, and even threats or violence against publishers and their families.
  • What are some examples of non-technical censorship methods used against internet publishers?: Non-technical censorship methods include legal prohibitions on content, requests for removal, arrests, civil lawsuits, confiscation of equipment, business closures, boycotts, and even threats or violence against publishers and their families.

Deplatforming involves suspending or banning controversial speakers or their content from online platforms.

Answer: True

Deplatforming is a form of internet censorship where individuals or content deemed controversial are removed or banned from online platforms, services, or payment processors.

Related Concepts:

  • What is deplatforming, and how does it function as a form of internet censorship?: Deplatforming is a type of internet censorship where social media platforms or service providers suspend, ban, or remove controversial speakers or their content. This practice is often justified by platform policies against hate speech or the glorification of violence, as seen in the coordinated bans of Alex Jones in 2018.
  • What is 'financial deplatforming'?: Financial deplatforming refers to the practice where banking and financial service providers deny services to controversial activists or organizations, effectively cutting off their access to financial transactions.

'Financial deplatforming' refers to the denial of banking services to controversial individuals or organizations.

Answer: True

Financial deplatforming describes the practice of denying essential banking and financial services to individuals or organizations, thereby restricting their ability to conduct transactions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'financial deplatforming'?: Financial deplatforming refers to the practice where banking and financial service providers deny services to controversial activists or organizations, effectively cutting off their access to financial transactions.
  • What is deplatforming, and how does it function as a form of internet censorship?: Deplatforming is a type of internet censorship where social media platforms or service providers suspend, ban, or remove controversial speakers or their content. This practice is often justified by platform policies against hate speech or the glorification of violence, as seen in the coordinated bans of Alex Jones in 2018.

Terms of Service agreements typically grant web operators very limited power to remove content.

Answer: False

Terms of Service agreements commonly include clauses, such as 'at our sole discretion,' which grant web operators significant latitude and broad power to remove content or terminate user accounts.

Related Concepts:

  • What common phrases in Terms of Service agreements grant web service operators broad rights regarding content removal?: Common phrases found in Terms of Service agreements that grant broad rights include 'at our sole discretion,' 'without prior notice,' and 'for other reasons.' These allow companies like Facebook, Google, Twitter, and YouTube to remove content or terminate accounts with significant latitude.

Wikipedia strictly prohibits any editor from modifying or deleting content on its platform.

Answer: False

Wikipedia's collaborative editing model allows any editor to modify or delete content as part of its standard operational procedures, subject to community guidelines and administrator oversight.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Wikipedia handle content removal or modification?: Wikipedia allows any editor to modify or delete content as part of its normal editing process. Articles can be proposed for deletion if they violate site rules, and administrators can perform speedy deletions or revision deletions (RevDel) to sanitize or redact specific information.

'Social filtering' involves censoring topics that contradict accepted societal norms.

Answer: True

Social filtering refers to the practice of censoring topics or content that are deemed to contradict or challenge widely accepted societal norms, often including material related to hate speech, pornography, or blasphemy.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'social filtering' in the context of internet censorship?: Social filtering refers to the censorship of topics considered antithetical to accepted societal norms. This often includes content related to hate speech, illegal drug use, pornography, gambling, and blasphemous material, particularly when it targets a state-supported religion.

Commercial filtering software vendors can be involved in censorship by selling tools to governments.

Answer: True

Commercial filtering software vendors play a role in global internet censorship by supplying tools that governments can utilize for content control and surveillance purposes.

Related Concepts:

  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What concerns have been raised regarding the role of commercial filtering software vendors in censorship?: Concerns exist that commercial filtering software vendors may be complicit in censorship by selling products to repressive governments. Additionally, regulations and oversight for these vendors are often lacking, and they may protect their blocking categories as intellectual property, effectively outsourcing content decisions to them.

Non-technical censorship methods include confiscation of equipment and threats against publishers.

Answer: True

Non-technical censorship encompasses a range of coercive measures, including the confiscation of publishing equipment and the use of threats or intimidation against individuals involved in content creation or dissemination.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some examples of non-technical censorship methods used against internet publishers?: Non-technical censorship methods include legal prohibitions on content, requests for removal, arrests, civil lawsuits, confiscation of equipment, business closures, boycotts, and even threats or violence against publishers and their families.
  • What are some examples of non-technical censorship methods used against internet publishers?: Non-technical censorship methods include legal prohibitions on content, requests for removal, arrests, civil lawsuits, confiscation of equipment, business closures, boycotts, and even threats or violence against publishers and their families.
  • What are some non-technical methods of internet censorship that mirror traditional media censorship?: Non-technical censorship methods include enacting laws and regulations to prohibit content, issuing formal or informal requests for content removal, accepting bribes to slant information, arresting or prosecuting publishers and ISPs, confiscating equipment, closing businesses, boycotting, and even resorting to threats or violence against individuals involved in online content creation.

Which of the following entities might implement internet access restrictions, and view them as ethical behavior rather than censorship?

Answer: Schools and libraries.

Institutions such as schools and libraries may implement content restrictions, often framing these actions as ethical measures to protect users or maintain an appropriate environment, rather than as censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond state-mandated control, what other entities might implement internet access restrictions, and how do they view this action?: Organizations that provide internet access, such as schools and libraries, may choose to restrict access to material they deem undesirable, offensive, age-inappropriate, or illegal. They often consider these restrictions ethical behavior rather than censorship.
  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.

Portal censorship and search result removal primarily impact a website by:

Answer: Making it invisible to users unaware of its existence.

Portal censorship and search result removal significantly reduce a website's visibility, effectively making it inaccessible to users who do not already know of its existence.

Related Concepts:

  • How can portal censorship and search result removal impact a website's visibility?: Major portals and search engines can choose to exclude specific websites from their listings, rendering them invisible to users who are unaware of their existence. This practice, sometimes done to comply with legal requirements (like Google's compliance with German and French law regarding Neo-Nazi content), has a similar effect to direct censorship.

Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks can be used in relation to censorship by:

Answer: Overwhelming a target system to disrupt services and limit access.

Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks can be employed in censorship efforts by overwhelming target systems, thereby disrupting services and limiting user access to online platforms or websites.

Related Concepts:

  • What are denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, and how are they used in relation to internet censorship?: Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks are computer network attacks designed to disrupt services by overwhelming a target system. They can be used to prevent or limit access to websites or online services, similar to blocking techniques, although typically only for a limited duration, and are often employed by non-state actors.

Commercial filtering software vendors have faced concerns regarding:

Answer: Potential complicity in censorship by selling to repressive regimes.

Concerns have been raised that commercial filtering software vendors may facilitate censorship by selling their products to authoritarian governments, thereby potentially enabling human rights violations.

Related Concepts:

  • What concerns have been raised regarding the role of commercial filtering software vendors in censorship?: Concerns exist that commercial filtering software vendors may be complicit in censorship by selling products to repressive governments. Additionally, regulations and oversight for these vendors are often lacking, and they may protect their blocking categories as intellectual property, effectively outsourcing content decisions to them.
  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.

Which of the following is an example of a non-technical method of internet censorship?

Answer: Arresting or prosecuting publishers

Arresting or prosecuting individuals involved in publishing online content is a non-technical method of censorship, distinct from technical measures like DNS spoofing, packet filtering, or IP address blocking.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some non-technical methods of internet censorship that mirror traditional media censorship?: Non-technical censorship methods include enacting laws and regulations to prohibit content, issuing formal or informal requests for content removal, accepting bribes to slant information, arresting or prosecuting publishers and ISPs, confiscating equipment, closing businesses, boycotting, and even resorting to threats or violence against individuals involved in online content creation.
  • What are some examples of non-technical censorship methods used against internet publishers?: Non-technical censorship methods include legal prohibitions on content, requests for removal, arrests, civil lawsuits, confiscation of equipment, business closures, boycotts, and even threats or violence against publishers and their families.
  • What are some examples of non-technical censorship methods used against internet publishers?: Non-technical censorship methods include legal prohibitions on content, requests for removal, arrests, civil lawsuits, confiscation of equipment, business closures, boycotts, and even threats or violence against publishers and their families.

What is 'deplatforming' as described in the article?

Answer: Suspending or banning controversial speakers from online platforms.

Deplatforming refers to the practice of removing or banning individuals or their content from online platforms, often justified by terms of service violations related to hate speech or harmful content.

Related Concepts:

  • What is deplatforming, and how does it function as a form of internet censorship?: Deplatforming is a type of internet censorship where social media platforms or service providers suspend, ban, or remove controversial speakers or their content. This practice is often justified by platform policies against hate speech or the glorification of violence, as seen in the coordinated bans of Alex Jones in 2018.
  • What is 'financial deplatforming'?: Financial deplatforming refers to the practice where banking and financial service providers deny services to controversial activists or organizations, effectively cutting off their access to financial transactions.

The phrase 'at our sole discretion' found in Terms of Service agreements typically grants web operators:

Answer: Broad rights regarding content removal.

The inclusion of phrases like 'at our sole discretion' in Terms of Service agreements typically confers broad authority upon web operators to manage content and user accounts with significant autonomy.

Related Concepts:

  • What common phrases in Terms of Service agreements grant web service operators broad rights regarding content removal?: Common phrases found in Terms of Service agreements that grant broad rights include 'at our sole discretion,' 'without prior notice,' and 'for other reasons.' These allow companies like Facebook, Google, Twitter, and YouTube to remove content or terminate accounts with significant latitude.

How does Wikipedia handle content removal?

Answer: Any editor can modify or delete content as part of the normal editing process.

Wikipedia operates on a collaborative model where content modification and deletion are integral parts of the editing process, accessible to any registered editor, subject to community consensus and policies.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Wikipedia handle content removal or modification?: Wikipedia allows any editor to modify or delete content as part of its normal editing process. Articles can be proposed for deletion if they violate site rules, and administrators can perform speedy deletions or revision deletions (RevDel) to sanitize or redact specific information.

What does 'social filtering' refer to in the context of internet censorship?

Answer: Censorship of topics considered antithetical to accepted societal norms.

Social filtering denotes the censorship of topics or content that are perceived to conflict with established societal norms, often including material related to hate speech, obscenity, or blasphemy.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'social filtering' in the context of internet censorship?: Social filtering refers to the censorship of topics considered antithetical to accepted societal norms. This often includes content related to hate speech, illegal drug use, pornography, gambling, and blasphemous material, particularly when it targets a state-supported religion.
  • What is the fundamental definition of internet censorship as presented in the source material?: Internet censorship is defined as the legal control or suppression of content accessible, published, or viewed on the Internet. This control may be applied to specific domains or, in exceptional circumstances, extend to all internet resources beyond the censoring state's jurisdiction.

Which types of network tools and applications are frequently targeted for censorship?

Answer: Media sharing sites and social networks.

Platforms facilitating user-generated content and social interaction, such as media sharing sites and social networks, are frequently targeted for censorship due to their potential for disseminating information and organizing activities.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of network tools and applications are frequently targeted for censorship?: Tools and applications that facilitate user access and sharing of sensitive material are often targeted. This includes media sharing sites (like Flickr and YouTube), social networks (Facebook, Instagram), translation services, email providers, web hosting sites, blog hosting sites, microblogging platforms (Twitter, Weibo), censorship circumvention sites, and search engines.
  • At what levels can internet censorship enforcement be applied within a country's infrastructure?: Enforcement of censorship technologies can occur at multiple levels, including the internet backbone (like IXPs), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), individual institutions (schools, libraries), personal devices (via pre-installed software), application service providers (like social media companies), certificate authorities, and Content Delivery Networks (CDNs).

What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?

Answer: They sell products that can be used by governments for censorship.

Commercial filtering software vendors contribute to global internet censorship by marketing and selling products that governments can employ for content control and surveillance.

Related Concepts:

  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What role do commercial filtering software vendors play in global internet censorship?: Commercial filtering software vendors sell products that are used by governments worldwide to block content deemed sensitive or undesirable. While marketed for protection, these tools can be repurposed for state-sponsored censorship, raising ethical concerns about the vendors' practices and accountability.
  • What concerns have been raised regarding the role of commercial filtering software vendors in censorship?: Concerns exist that commercial filtering software vendors may be complicit in censorship by selling products to repressive governments. Additionally, regulations and oversight for these vendors are often lacking, and they may protect their blocking categories as intellectual property, effectively outsourcing content decisions to them.

Circumvention Strategies and User Resilience

In 2014, approximately 400 million people were estimated to use VPNs primarily for enhancing online privacy.

Answer: True

Data from around 2014 suggests that over 400 million individuals utilized Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), often for the dual purposes of circumventing internet censorship and enhancing their online privacy.

Related Concepts:

  • How many people were estimated to use virtual private networks (VPNs) in 2014 to circumvent censorship or enhance privacy?: According to GlobalWebIndex data from around 2014, over 400 million people were using virtual private networks (VPNs). These users employed VPNs either to bypass internet censorship or to increase their online privacy.

Internet censorship circumvention aims to remove content entirely, not just bypass access restrictions.

Answer: False

Internet censorship circumvention primarily focuses on bypassing access restrictions to reach censored content, rather than aiming for the complete removal of the content itself.

Related Concepts:

  • What is internet censorship circumvention, and why is it a challenge for censors?: Internet censorship circumvention involves using various techniques and tools to bypass technical filtering and blocking measures, allowing users to access censored material. It poses a challenge for censors because blocking typically restricts access rather than removing content, meaning that as long as an uncensored system exists, access can often be regained.

Using VPNs and proxy websites are common methods for circumventing internet censorship.

Answer: True

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and proxy websites are widely recognized and commonly employed tools for circumventing internet censorship measures and accessing restricted content.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some common tools and resources used for internet censorship circumvention?: Common methods for circumventing internet censorship include proxy websites, virtual private networks (VPNs), sneakernets (physical transfer of data), the dark web, and specialized circumvention software tools.
  • How many people were estimated to use virtual private networks (VPNs) in 2014 to circumvent censorship or enhance privacy?: According to GlobalWebIndex data from around 2014, over 400 million people were using virtual private networks (VPNs). These users employed VPNs either to bypass internet censorship or to increase their online privacy.
  • What is internet censorship circumvention, and why is it a challenge for censors?: Internet censorship circumvention involves using various techniques and tools to bypass technical filtering and blocking measures, allowing users to access censored material. It poses a challenge for censors because blocking typically restricts access rather than removing content, meaning that as long as an uncensored system exists, access can often be regained.

Using circumvention methods to bypass internet censorship carries no legal risks for users.

Answer: False

Engaging in internet censorship circumvention can carry significant legal risks in certain jurisdictions, potentially leading to penalties such as fines, imprisonment, or other forms of reprisal if users are found to be violating local laws.

Related Concepts:

  • What is internet censorship circumvention, and why is it a challenge for censors?: Internet censorship circumvention involves using various techniques and tools to bypass technical filtering and blocking measures, allowing users to access censored material. It poses a challenge for censors because blocking typically restricts access rather than removing content, meaning that as long as an uncensored system exists, access can often be regained.
  • What risks are associated with using circumvention methods to bypass internet censorship?: Using circumvention methods can carry risks, as individuals in some countries may be violating laws by accessing restricted content. If caught, they could face consequences such as expulsion, job loss, imprisonment, or other punishments.
  • What are some common tools and resources used for internet censorship circumvention?: Common methods for circumventing internet censorship include proxy websites, virtual private networks (VPNs), sneakernets (physical transfer of data), the dark web, and specialized circumvention software tools.

The widespread adoption of HTTPS has made internet censorship completely ineffective.

Answer: False

While HTTPS encryption limits the ability of censors to inspect the content of traffic, it does not render censorship completely ineffective. Domain names often remain visible, allowing for domain-level blocking, and other censorship methods persist.

Related Concepts:

  • How has the widespread adoption of HTTPS affected internet censorship capabilities?: The widespread adoption of HTTPS has limited censors' options, often forcing them into a binary choice of blocking all content or none of it, as the encryption obscures the specific content being accessed. However, the domain name itself often remains unencrypted in the TLS handshake, providing a potential point for filtering.
  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.
  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.

User resilience against censorship is primarily determined by the speed of their internet connection.

Answer: False

User resilience against censorship is influenced more by factors such as awareness of information manipulation, the demand for uncensored content, and the ability to afford circumvention tools, rather than solely by internet connection speed.

Related Concepts:

  • What factors influence user resilience against censorship attempts?: User resilience is influenced by awareness that information is being manipulated, which can lead to attempts to circumvent censorship and factor manipulation into belief systems. Other factors include the demand for concealed information and the ability to afford circumvention costs. Entertainment content is generally more resilient than political content.

'Sneakernet' refers to using encrypted tunnels to bypass internet censorship.

Answer: False

'Sneakernet' is a method of circumventing censorship that involves the physical transfer of data via removable media (e.g., USB drives), distinct from using encrypted tunnels like VPNs.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'sneakernet' in the context of circumventing internet censorship?: Sneakernet refers to the physical transfer of data, typically via removable media like USB drives or CDs, as a method to bypass internet censorship or access blocked information when direct online access is restricted.
  • What are some common tools and resources used for internet censorship circumvention?: Common methods for circumventing internet censorship include proxy websites, virtual private networks (VPNs), sneakernets (physical transfer of data), the dark web, and specialized circumvention software tools.

HTTPS encryption completely prevents censors from identifying the websites users visit.

Answer: False

While HTTPS encryption obscures the content of internet traffic, it does not completely prevent censors from identifying visited websites, as the domain name is often still visible during the TLS handshake, allowing for domain-level filtering.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.
  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.
  • How has the widespread adoption of HTTPS affected internet censorship capabilities?: The widespread adoption of HTTPS has limited censors' options, often forcing them into a binary choice of blocking all content or none of it, as the encryption obscures the specific content being accessed. However, the domain name itself often remains unencrypted in the TLS handshake, providing a potential point for filtering.

What was the estimated number of people using VPNs around 2014 for censorship circumvention or privacy?

Answer: Over 400 million

Global data from approximately 2014 estimated that more than 400 million individuals were utilizing VPNs, often for purposes of bypassing internet censorship or enhancing online privacy.

Related Concepts:

  • How many people were estimated to use virtual private networks (VPNs) in 2014 to circumvent censorship or enhance privacy?: According to GlobalWebIndex data from around 2014, over 400 million people were using virtual private networks (VPNs). These users employed VPNs either to bypass internet censorship or to increase their online privacy.

What is the main challenge posed by internet censorship circumvention to censors?

Answer: It allows users to regain access as long as an uncensored system exists.

The primary challenge for censors posed by circumvention techniques is that they enable users to regain access to restricted information, provided that alternative, uncensored pathways or systems remain available.

Related Concepts:

  • What is internet censorship circumvention, and why is it a challenge for censors?: Internet censorship circumvention involves using various techniques and tools to bypass technical filtering and blocking measures, allowing users to access censored material. It poses a challenge for censors because blocking typically restricts access rather than removing content, meaning that as long as an uncensored system exists, access can often be regained.
  • What fundamental challenge do censors face due to the internet's distributed nature, and what technical solutions are required?: Censors face the challenge of controlling information hosted outside their physical or legal jurisdiction. This necessitates the use of technical methods like site blocking and content filtering, which are specific to the internet's architecture, to prevent access to external resources.
  • What are some common tools and resources used for internet censorship circumvention?: Common methods for circumventing internet censorship include proxy websites, virtual private networks (VPNs), sneakernets (physical transfer of data), the dark web, and specialized circumvention software tools.

Which of the following is a common tool used for circumventing internet censorship?

Answer: Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are widely employed as common tools to circumvent internet censorship by encrypting traffic and routing it through servers in different locations.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some common tools and resources used for internet censorship circumvention?: Common methods for circumventing internet censorship include proxy websites, virtual private networks (VPNs), sneakernets (physical transfer of data), the dark web, and specialized circumvention software tools.
  • What is internet censorship circumvention, and why is it a challenge for censors?: Internet censorship circumvention involves using various techniques and tools to bypass technical filtering and blocking measures, allowing users to access censored material. It poses a challenge for censors because blocking typically restricts access rather than removing content, meaning that as long as an uncensored system exists, access can often be regained.
  • What is network disconnection as a censorship method, and what is one circumvention technique?: Network disconnection is a simpler censorship method involving the complete shutdown of internet routers, either through software commands or physical means like turning off equipment or unplugging cables. Using a satellite ISP can be a way to circumvent such widespread disconnections.

What risk might users face when using circumvention methods to bypass internet censorship?

Answer: Potential violation of local laws and subsequent punishment.

Utilizing circumvention methods to bypass internet censorship can expose users to legal risks, potentially leading to penalties if such actions contravene local legislation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is internet censorship circumvention, and why is it a challenge for censors?: Internet censorship circumvention involves using various techniques and tools to bypass technical filtering and blocking measures, allowing users to access censored material. It poses a challenge for censors because blocking typically restricts access rather than removing content, meaning that as long as an uncensored system exists, access can often be regained.
  • What risks are associated with using circumvention methods to bypass internet censorship?: Using circumvention methods can carry risks, as individuals in some countries may be violating laws by accessing restricted content. If caught, they could face consequences such as expulsion, job loss, imprisonment, or other punishments.
  • What are some common tools and resources used for internet censorship circumvention?: Common methods for circumventing internet censorship include proxy websites, virtual private networks (VPNs), sneakernets (physical transfer of data), the dark web, and specialized circumvention software tools.

How has the increased use of HTTPS affected internet censorship?

Answer: It obscures the content of traffic, limiting keyword-based filtering, but domain names may remain visible.

HTTPS encryption hinders censors' ability to inspect traffic content, thereby limiting keyword-based filtering. However, domain names often remain visible, allowing for domain-level blocking strategies.

Related Concepts:

  • How has the widespread adoption of HTTPS affected internet censorship capabilities?: The widespread adoption of HTTPS has limited censors' options, often forcing them into a binary choice of blocking all content or none of it, as the encryption obscures the specific content being accessed. However, the domain name itself often remains unencrypted in the TLS handshake, providing a potential point for filtering.
  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.
  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.

What factor influences user resilience against censorship attempts, according to the source?

Answer: Awareness that information is being manipulated.

Awareness of information manipulation is a key factor influencing user resilience against censorship, potentially motivating users to seek out alternative information sources and employ circumvention strategies.

Related Concepts:

  • What factors influence user resilience against censorship attempts?: User resilience is influenced by awareness that information is being manipulated, which can lead to attempts to circumvent censorship and factor manipulation into belief systems. Other factors include the demand for concealed information and the ability to afford circumvention costs. Entertainment content is generally more resilient than political content.

What is 'sneakernet' in the context of circumventing internet censorship?

Answer: The physical transfer of data via removable media.

'Sneakernet' refers to the method of transferring data physically, typically using removable media like USB drives, as a means to bypass internet censorship or access restricted information.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'sneakernet' in the context of circumventing internet censorship?: Sneakernet refers to the physical transfer of data, typically via removable media like USB drives or CDs, as a method to bypass internet censorship or access blocked information when direct online access is restricted.
  • What are some common tools and resources used for internet censorship circumvention?: Common methods for circumventing internet censorship include proxy websites, virtual private networks (VPNs), sneakernets (physical transfer of data), the dark web, and specialized circumvention software tools.

How does the use of HTTPS impact internet censorship techniques?

Answer: It obscures the content of traffic, limiting keyword-based filtering, but domain names may remain visible.

HTTPS encryption enhances user privacy by obscuring traffic content, thereby limiting the effectiveness of keyword-based filtering. However, domain name visibility can still permit certain forms of censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.
  • How does the use of HTTPS impact the effectiveness of certain internet censorship techniques?: HTTPS encryption makes it harder for censors to inspect the content of internet traffic, potentially limiting their ability to filter based on keywords within the data. However, the domain name itself often remains visible, allowing for domain-level blocking.
  • How has the widespread adoption of HTTPS affected internet censorship capabilities?: The widespread adoption of HTTPS has limited censors' options, often forcing them into a binary choice of blocking all content or none of it, as the encryption obscures the specific content being accessed. However, the domain name itself often remains unencrypted in the TLS handshake, providing a potential point for filtering.

Global Landscape, Monitoring, and Emerging Concepts

The extent of internet censorship is uniform across all countries globally.

Answer: False

The extent of internet censorship varies significantly across the globe, ranging from moderate restrictions in some nations to severe limitations in others.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the extent of internet censorship vary globally, and what are some examples of its application?: The extent of internet censorship differs significantly from country to country. Some nations practice moderate censorship, while others severely limit access to information, suppress discussions, and silence citizens, particularly during events like elections or protests, as seen during the Arab Spring.

A 2012 Internet Society survey found that a significant majority of respondents believed internet access should be a basic human right.

Answer: True

The 2012 Internet Society survey indicated that a substantial majority of respondents (83%) affirmed the belief that internet access should be recognized as a basic human right.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the general sentiment regarding internet censorship and freedom in a 2012 Internet Society survey?: A 2012 Internet Society survey indicated a complex view among respondents: 71% agreed that censorship should exist in some form on the internet. Simultaneously, a strong majority believed internet access should be a basic human right (83%) and that freedom of expression should be guaranteed online (86%).

The 'right to be forgotten' allows individuals to permanently erase any mention of themselves online.

Answer: False

The 'right to be forgotten,' particularly as interpreted in the EU, allows individuals to request the removal of links to certain personal information from search engine results under specific conditions, but it does not grant the power to permanently erase all online mentions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'right to be forgotten' in the context of EU data privacy law?: The 'right to be forgotten' allows individuals in the EU to request search engines to remove links to personal information that is considered irrelevant, outdated, or excessive, even if legally published initially. This ruling places responsibility on search engines to manage such requests.
  • What is the 'right to be forgotten' in the context of EU data privacy law?: The 'right to be forgotten' allows individuals in the EU to request search engines to remove links to personal information that is considered irrelevant, outdated, or excessive, even if legally published initially. This ruling places responsibility on search engines to manage such requests.
  • What is the 'right to be forgotten,' and how was it addressed by the European Court of Justice?: The 'right to be forgotten' is a concept, particularly discussed in the EU, that allows individuals to request the removal of links to personal information from search engine results. The European Court of Justice ruled in the Costeja case that search engines are responsible for the data they point to, requiring them to comply with EU data privacy laws.

State-mandated internet filtering is most commonly found in East Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East/North Africa regions.

Answer: True

State-mandated internet filtering is indeed most prevalent in regions such as East Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East/North Africa, although it is also practiced in varying degrees in other parts of the world.

Related Concepts:

  • Which regions of the world are most associated with state-mandated internet filtering?: Countries engaged in state-mandated internet filtering are primarily clustered in three regions: East Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East/North Africa region. However, filtering also occurs in other regions, including some democracies.
  • What did the OpenNet Initiative report regarding internet filtering levels in various countries between 2007 and 2009?: The OpenNet Initiative reported that by 2009, internet filtering was documented in over forty countries. Their analysis classified filtering levels in political, social, and security areas, finding China to engage in pervasive filtering across all three, while countries like Egypt, France, Germany, India, Ukraine, the UK, and the US showed no evidence of filtering in those areas.
  • How does the extent of internet censorship vary globally, and what are some examples of its application?: The extent of internet censorship differs significantly from country to country. Some nations practice moderate censorship, while others severely limit access to information, suppress discussions, and silence citizens, particularly during events like elections or protests, as seen during the Arab Spring.

In France and Germany, content related to Nazism or Holocaust denial is typically blocked due to specific laws.

Answer: True

France and Germany have specific legal frameworks that mandate the blocking of content related to Nazism and Holocaust denial.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific types of content are commonly blocked in France and Germany due to legal requirements?: In France and Germany, content related to Nazism or Holocaust denial is typically blocked due to specific laws in those countries.

The 'splinternet' concept describes the unified and globally consistent nature of the internet.

Answer: False

The 'splinternet' concept refers to the fragmentation of the global internet into distinct national or regional networks, often due to differing censorship policies and national firewalls, rather than its unified nature.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks. This fragmentation is often driven by national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks, often due to national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept in relation to internet censorship?: The term 'splinternet' is sometimes used to describe the fragmentation of the global internet into separate national or regional networks, often due to the implementation of national firewalls and censorship measures.

'Rivercrab' is a formal term used in international law to describe internet censorship.

Answer: False

'Rivercrab' is a colloquial or slang term, particularly used in Asia, referring to the act of censoring the internet, not a formal legal term.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the colloquial meaning of 'rivercrab' in the context of internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.
  • What is the 'rivercrab' slang term related to internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.
  • What is the 'rivercrab' slang term related to internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.

South Korea's Telecommunications Business Act (TBA) was the world's first internet censorship law.

Answer: True

The Telecommunications Business Act (TBA) passed by South Korea is noted as the world's first piece of legislation specifically addressing internet censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Telecommunications Business Act (TBA) passed by South Korea?: The Telecommunications Business Act (TBA), passed by South Korea between 1995 and 2002, is noted as the world's first internet censorship law.

The OpenNet Initiative (ONI) reported in 2009 that internet filtering was documented in fewer than twenty countries.

Answer: False

By 2009, the OpenNet Initiative (ONI) documented internet filtering in over forty countries, indicating a widespread practice rather than limited to fewer than twenty.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the OpenNet Initiative report regarding internet filtering levels in various countries between 2007 and 2009?: The OpenNet Initiative reported that by 2009, internet filtering was documented in over forty countries. Their analysis classified filtering levels in political, social, and security areas, finding China to engage in pervasive filtering across all three, while countries like Egypt, France, Germany, India, Ukraine, the UK, and the US showed no evidence of filtering in those areas.
  • Which regions of the world are most associated with state-mandated internet filtering?: Countries engaged in state-mandated internet filtering are primarily clustered in three regions: East Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East/North Africa region. However, filtering also occurs in other regions, including some democracies.
  • What is the purpose of organizations like the OpenNet Initiative (ONI)?: The OpenNet Initiative was a collaborative project focused on monitoring and reporting on internet filtering and surveillance practices employed by nations worldwide. Their research helped document the global landscape of internet censorship.

Freedom House's 'Freedom on the Net' reports assess internet freedom by rating countries based on content limitations and user rights violations.

Answer: True

The 'Freedom on the Net' reports by Freedom House provide comprehensive assessments of internet freedom globally, evaluating countries based on criteria including obstacles to access, content limitations, and violations of user rights.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the 'Freedom on the Net' reports published by Freedom House?: The 'Freedom on the Net' reports provide analytical assessments and numerical ratings on the state of internet freedom in countries worldwide. They evaluate obstacles to access, limits on content, and violations of user rights, categorizing countries as 'Free,' 'Partly Free,' or 'Not Free'.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) designates countries as 'Enemies of the Internet' solely for practicing general online surveillance.

Answer: False

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) designates countries as 'Enemies of the Internet' not solely for online surveillance, but for systematic repression of internet users and grave violations of freedom of information, which often includes censorship beyond mere surveillance.

Related Concepts:

  • How do organizations like Reporters Without Borders (RSF) contribute to understanding internet censorship?: RSF advocates for press freedom and publishes lists such as 'Enemies of the Internet' and 'Countries Under Surveillance' to highlight nations that engage in systematic repression of internet users and violate freedom of information.
  • How do organizations like Reporters Without Borders (RSF) contribute to understanding internet censorship?: RSF advocates for press freedom and publishes lists such as 'Enemies of the Internet' and 'Countries Under Surveillance' to highlight nations that engage in systematic repression of internet users and violate freedom of information.
  • What criteria does Reporters Without Borders (RSF) use to designate a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet'?: RSF designates a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet' if its government not only censors news and information online but also engages in almost systematic repression of internet users, leading to grave violations of freedom of information and human rights.

In March 2013, Reporters Without Borders identified China, Iran, Syria, Vietnam, and North Korea as 'State Enemies of the Internet'.

Answer: False

In March 2013, Reporters Without Borders identified Bahrain, China, Iran, Syria, and Vietnam as 'State Enemies of the Internet,' not North Korea.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the five 'State Enemies of the Internet' identified by Reporters Without Borders in March 2013?: In March 2013, Reporters Without Borders identified Bahrain, China, Iran, Syria, and Vietnam as 'State Enemies of the Internet' due to their governments' active surveillance and repression of news providers.

The V-Dem Digital Societies Project measures aspects like disinformation and state regulation of digital media.

Answer: True

The V-Dem Digital Societies Project is an annual initiative that quantifies various dimensions of internet censorship, including the prevalence of disinformation and the extent of state regulation over digital media.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the V-Dem Digital Societies Project, and what does it measure?: The V-Dem Digital Societies Project is an annual report that measures various aspects of internet censorship, including misinformation online and internet shutdowns. It uses 35 indicators across five areas: disinformation, digital media freedom, state regulation of digital media, polarization of online media, and online social cleavages.

The #KeepItOn project tracks and advocates against internet shutdowns and blockages.

Answer: True

The #KeepItOn project, maintained by Access Now, actively monitors and advocates against the implementation of internet shutdowns, throttling, and other forms of network blockages worldwide.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary goal of the #KeepItOn project?: The #KeepItOn project, maintained by Access Now, aims to combat internet shutdowns, throttling, and blockages by tracking these incidents globally and advocating for the protection of internet access and freedom of expression.
  • What is the primary goal of the #KeepItOn project?: The #KeepItOn project, maintained by Access Now, aims to combat internet shutdowns, throttling, and blockages by tracking these incidents globally and advocating for the protection of internet access and freedom of expression.
  • What is the #KeepItOn project maintained by Access Now?: Access Now maintains the #KeepItOn project, which tracks internet shutdowns, throttling, and blockages annually. This project documents the location, duration, impacted services, and stated versus actual reasons for these disruptions.

A 2010 BBC World Service poll indicated that most internet users globally viewed the internet as a force for restriction.

Answer: False

A 2010 BBC World Service poll found that the majority of global internet users perceived the internet as a force for good and freedom, not restriction.

Related Concepts:

  • What were some key findings from a 2010 BBC World Service global opinion poll regarding the internet?: The BBC poll found that most internet users globally viewed the internet as a force for good and a source of freedom. A majority (53%) believed the internet should never be regulated by any government, though opinions were divided on whether it was a safe place for expression.
  • What did the Internet Society's 2012 Global Internet User Survey reveal about user attitudes towards government control?: The Internet Society survey found that 82% of users agreed the internet should be governed to protect the community from harm, while 71% believed censorship should exist in some form. However, 77% agreed that increased government control would limit their access to content and 74% felt it would limit their freedom of expression.
  • What was the general sentiment regarding internet censorship and freedom in a 2012 Internet Society survey?: A 2012 Internet Society survey indicated a complex view among respondents: 71% agreed that censorship should exist in some form on the internet. Simultaneously, a strong majority believed internet access should be a basic human right (83%) and that freedom of expression should be guaranteed online (86%).

The 2012 Internet Society survey revealed a strong consensus that the internet should never be governed.

Answer: False

The 2012 Internet Society survey indicated that a majority of users (82%) agreed the internet should be governed to protect the community, contrary to the notion that it should never be governed.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the general sentiment regarding internet censorship and freedom in a 2012 Internet Society survey?: A 2012 Internet Society survey indicated a complex view among respondents: 71% agreed that censorship should exist in some form on the internet. Simultaneously, a strong majority believed internet access should be a basic human right (83%) and that freedom of expression should be guaranteed online (86%).
  • What did the Internet Society's 2012 Global Internet User Survey reveal about user attitudes towards government control?: The Internet Society survey found that 82% of users agreed the internet should be governed to protect the community from harm, while 71% believed censorship should exist in some form. However, 77% agreed that increased government control would limit their access to content and 74% felt it would limit their freedom of expression.

Lack of transparency regarding government filtering activities makes it difficult to understand the extent of censorship.

Answer: True

The opacity surrounding government filtering practices, often involving misleading error messages or justifications, significantly hinders the ability to ascertain the true scope and nature of internet censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of transparency (or lack thereof) in internet filtering activities by governments?: Many countries that filter or block online content are opaque about their activities, often providing misleading error messages or justifications. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for users and researchers to understand the extent and nature of censorship.

The Arab Spring uprisings led to a decrease in internet censorship globally.

Answer: False

The Arab Spring uprisings, characterized by extensive internet use for mobilization, paradoxically led to an increase in internet censorship and shutdowns in several countries, although some nations did subsequently reduce their censorship levels.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Arab Spring uprisings influence internet censorship practices?: During the Arab Spring, the extensive use of internet and mobile technologies for organizing protests led to increased censorship, including complete internet shutdowns in countries like Egypt and Libya. While some countries moved off 'Internet Enemies' lists, warnings emerged that censorship might increase elsewhere.
  • How does the extent of internet censorship vary globally, and what are some examples of its application?: The extent of internet censorship differs significantly from country to country. Some nations practice moderate censorship, while others severely limit access to information, suppress discussions, and silence citizens, particularly during events like elections or protests, as seen during the Arab Spring.

Egypt's 2011 internet block involved shutting down approximately 3500 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes.

Answer: True

During the 2011 Egyptian revolution, the government implemented a significant internet block by disabling approximately 3500 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes, effectively isolating large portions of the country's network.

Related Concepts:

  • What technical measures did Egypt employ during the 2011 revolution to block internet access?: During the 2011 Egyptian revolution, the government implemented an unprecedented internet block by shutting down approximately 3500 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes to Egyptian networks, effectively disconnecting much of the country without cutting major intercontinental fiber-optic links.

During Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the government blocked access to Telegram and WhatsApp.

Answer: False

Reports indicate that during Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, access to platforms like Twitter and Facebook was blocked or restricted, while Telegram and WhatsApp remained accessible, though VPN usage increased to bypass restrictions.

Related Concepts:

  • What actions did Russia reportedly take regarding social media platforms during its 2022 invasion of Ukraine?: During the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia reportedly blocked Twitter and Facebook. Facebook was suspended due to its policy on reviewing Russian state-backed media, while Twitter faced regional suspension. VPN usage was noted as a method to circumvent these restrictions.

The 'Great Firewall' is a term associated with the internet censorship system in the United States.

Answer: False

The 'Great Firewall' is the widely recognized colloquial term for the extensive internet censorship and surveillance system implemented in the People's Republic of China.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Great Firewall'?: The 'Great Firewall' is a colloquial term for China's extensive internet regulations and censorship system, which employs various technical measures to control and filter online content within the country.

The OpenNet Initiative (ONI) focused on promoting internet freedom globally.

Answer: False

The OpenNet Initiative (ONI) was primarily focused on monitoring and reporting on internet filtering and surveillance practices worldwide, rather than actively promoting internet freedom.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of organizations like the OpenNet Initiative (ONI)?: The OpenNet Initiative was a collaborative project focused on monitoring and reporting on internet filtering and surveillance practices employed by nations worldwide. Their research helped document the global landscape of internet censorship.

The 'Online Survival Kit' is a resource provided by Reporters Without Borders to help users bypass censorship.

Answer: True

The 'Online Survival Kit' is indeed a resource developed by Reporters Without Borders as part of their efforts to equip users with knowledge and tools to navigate and circumvent internet censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Online Survival Kit' mentioned in the external links section?: The 'Online Survival Kit' is a resource developed by Reporters Without Borders as part of their 'We Fight Censorship' project. It provides information and tools to help users navigate and bypass internet censorship.

RFC 9505 is a document detailing technical methods used globally for internet censorship.

Answer: True

RFC 9505, titled 'A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques,' serves as a technical document that outlines the various methods employed globally for internet censorship.

Related Concepts:

  • What is RFC 9505?: RFC 9505 is a document titled 'A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques,' providing a technical overview of the methods used globally to censor internet content.

The 'splinternet' concept describes the fragmentation of the internet into national or regional networks.

Answer: True

The 'splinternet' concept posits that the global internet is increasingly fragmenting into separate national or regional networks, often as a consequence of national firewalls and censorship policies.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks. This fragmentation is often driven by national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks, often due to national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept in relation to internet censorship?: The term 'splinternet' is sometimes used to describe the fragmentation of the global internet into separate national or regional networks, often due to the implementation of national firewalls and censorship measures.

The term 'rivercrab' is slang used in Asia for the act of censoring the internet.

Answer: True

'Rivercrab' is indeed internet slang, particularly prevalent in Asia, used colloquially to refer to the act of censoring internet content.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the colloquial meaning of 'rivercrab' in the context of internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.
  • What is the 'rivercrab' slang term related to internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.
  • What is the 'rivercrab' slang term related to internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.

The primary goal of the #KeepItOn project is to promote internet shutdowns for national security.

Answer: False

The #KeepItOn project's primary objective is to advocate against internet shutdowns and blockages, aiming to protect internet access and freedom of expression, not to promote shutdowns for national security.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary goal of the #KeepItOn project?: The #KeepItOn project, maintained by Access Now, aims to combat internet shutdowns, throttling, and blockages by tracking these incidents globally and advocating for the protection of internet access and freedom of expression.
  • What is the primary goal of the #KeepItOn project?: The #KeepItOn project, maintained by Access Now, aims to combat internet shutdowns, throttling, and blockages by tracking these incidents globally and advocating for the protection of internet access and freedom of expression.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) helps understand internet censorship by publishing lists of 'Enemies of the Internet'.

Answer: True

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) contributes to the understanding of internet censorship by publishing influential lists, such as 'Enemies of the Internet,' which highlight countries engaging in severe repression of online freedom.

Related Concepts:

  • How do organizations like Reporters Without Borders (RSF) contribute to understanding internet censorship?: RSF advocates for press freedom and publishes lists such as 'Enemies of the Internet' and 'Countries Under Surveillance' to highlight nations that engage in systematic repression of internet users and violate freedom of information.
  • How do organizations like Reporters Without Borders (RSF) contribute to understanding internet censorship?: RSF advocates for press freedom and publishes lists such as 'Enemies of the Internet' and 'Countries Under Surveillance' to highlight nations that engage in systematic repression of internet users and violate freedom of information.
  • What criteria does Reporters Without Borders (RSF) use to designate a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet'?: RSF designates a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet' if its government not only censors news and information online but also engages in almost systematic repression of internet users, leading to grave violations of freedom of information and human rights.

The EU's 'right to be forgotten' requires search engines to remove any legally published information upon request.

Answer: False

The EU's 'right to be forgotten' does not mandate the removal of all legally published information; rather, it allows individuals to request the delisting of search engine results containing outdated, irrelevant, or excessive personal data under specific legal conditions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'right to be forgotten' in the context of EU data privacy law?: The 'right to be forgotten' allows individuals in the EU to request search engines to remove links to personal information that is considered irrelevant, outdated, or excessive, even if legally published initially. This ruling places responsibility on search engines to manage such requests.
  • What is the 'right to be forgotten' in the context of EU data privacy law?: The 'right to be forgotten' allows individuals in the EU to request search engines to remove links to personal information that is considered irrelevant, outdated, or excessive, even if legally published initially. This ruling places responsibility on search engines to manage such requests.
  • What is the 'right to be forgotten,' and how was it addressed by the European Court of Justice?: The 'right to be forgotten' is a concept, particularly discussed in the EU, that allows individuals to request the removal of links to personal information from search engine results. The European Court of Justice ruled in the Costeja case that search engines are responsible for the data they point to, requiring them to comply with EU data privacy laws.

How does the article describe the variation in internet censorship globally?

Answer: The extent varies significantly, from moderate to severe limitations.

The degree of internet censorship is highly variable across nations, ranging from moderate levels of control to severe restrictions on access and expression.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the extent of internet censorship vary globally, and what are some examples of its application?: The extent of internet censorship differs significantly from country to country. Some nations practice moderate censorship, while others severely limit access to information, suppress discussions, and silence citizens, particularly during events like elections or protests, as seen during the Arab Spring.

What did a 2012 Internet Society survey reveal about user attitudes towards the internet?

Answer: A majority agreed that censorship should exist in some form online.

The 2012 Internet Society survey indicated that while a majority believed internet access should be a human right, a significant portion also agreed that some form of censorship should be present online.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the general sentiment regarding internet censorship and freedom in a 2012 Internet Society survey?: A 2012 Internet Society survey indicated a complex view among respondents: 71% agreed that censorship should exist in some form on the internet. Simultaneously, a strong majority believed internet access should be a basic human right (83%) and that freedom of expression should be guaranteed online (86%).
  • What did the Internet Society's 2012 Global Internet User Survey reveal about user attitudes towards government control?: The Internet Society survey found that 82% of users agreed the internet should be governed to protect the community from harm, while 71% believed censorship should exist in some form. However, 77% agreed that increased government control would limit their access to content and 74% felt it would limit their freedom of expression.

The 'right to be forgotten' ruling by the European Court of Justice primarily placed responsibility on:

Answer: Search engines to comply with data privacy laws regarding linked information.

The European Court of Justice ruling on the 'right to be forgotten' primarily assigned responsibility to search engines to manage requests for the removal of links to personal information, aligning with data privacy regulations.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'right to be forgotten,' and how was it addressed by the European Court of Justice?: The 'right to be forgotten' is a concept, particularly discussed in the EU, that allows individuals to request the removal of links to personal information from search engine results. The European Court of Justice ruled in the Costeja case that search engines are responsible for the data they point to, requiring them to comply with EU data privacy laws.
  • What is the 'right to be forgotten' in the context of EU data privacy law?: The 'right to be forgotten' allows individuals in the EU to request search engines to remove links to personal information that is considered irrelevant, outdated, or excessive, even if legally published initially. This ruling places responsibility on search engines to manage such requests.
  • What is the 'right to be forgotten' in the context of EU data privacy law?: The 'right to be forgotten' allows individuals in the EU to request search engines to remove links to personal information that is considered irrelevant, outdated, or excessive, even if legally published initially. This ruling places responsibility on search engines to manage such requests.

Which regions are most associated with state-mandated internet filtering?

Answer: East Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East/North Africa.

State-mandated internet filtering is predominantly observed in regions including East Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East/North Africa, although it is not exclusive to these areas.

Related Concepts:

  • Which regions of the world are most associated with state-mandated internet filtering?: Countries engaged in state-mandated internet filtering are primarily clustered in three regions: East Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East/North Africa region. However, filtering also occurs in other regions, including some democracies.
  • What did the OpenNet Initiative report regarding internet filtering levels in various countries between 2007 and 2009?: The OpenNet Initiative reported that by 2009, internet filtering was documented in over forty countries. Their analysis classified filtering levels in political, social, and security areas, finding China to engage in pervasive filtering across all three, while countries like Egypt, France, Germany, India, Ukraine, the UK, and the US showed no evidence of filtering in those areas.
  • How does the extent of internet censorship vary globally, and what are some examples of its application?: The extent of internet censorship differs significantly from country to country. Some nations practice moderate censorship, while others severely limit access to information, suppress discussions, and silence citizens, particularly during events like elections or protests, as seen during the Arab Spring.

In France and Germany, specific laws commonly lead to the blocking of what type of content?

Answer: Content related to Nazism or Holocaust denial.

Specific legislation in France and Germany mandates the blocking of content pertaining to Nazism and Holocaust denial due to historical and legal sensitivities within those nations.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific types of content are commonly blocked in France and Germany due to legal requirements?: In France and Germany, content related to Nazism or Holocaust denial is typically blocked due to specific laws in those countries.

The term 'splinternet' refers to:

Answer: The fragmentation of the internet into national or regional networks.

The 'splinternet' concept describes the phenomenon of the global internet fragmenting into distinct national or regional networks, often influenced by censorship policies and national firewalls.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks. This fragmentation is often driven by national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks, often due to national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept in relation to internet censorship?: The term 'splinternet' is sometimes used to describe the fragmentation of the global internet into separate national or regional networks, often due to the implementation of national firewalls and censorship measures.

What is the colloquial meaning of 'rivercrab' in the context of internet censorship?

Answer: The act of censoring the internet.

In colloquial usage, particularly within Asian internet communities, 'rivercrab' is slang referring to the act of censoring internet content.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'rivercrab' slang term related to internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.
  • What is the 'rivercrab' slang term related to internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.
  • What is the colloquial meaning of 'rivercrab' in the context of internet censorship?: The term 'rivercrab' is internet slang, particularly used in Asia, that colloquially refers to the act of censoring the internet.

What did the OpenNet Initiative report regarding internet filtering levels in various countries by 2009?

Answer: Filtering was documented in over 40 countries.

By 2009, the OpenNet Initiative had documented the practice of internet filtering in more than forty countries worldwide, indicating its widespread nature.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the OpenNet Initiative report regarding internet filtering levels in various countries between 2007 and 2009?: The OpenNet Initiative reported that by 2009, internet filtering was documented in over forty countries. Their analysis classified filtering levels in political, social, and security areas, finding China to engage in pervasive filtering across all three, while countries like Egypt, France, Germany, India, Ukraine, the UK, and the US showed no evidence of filtering in those areas.
  • What is the purpose of organizations like the OpenNet Initiative (ONI)?: The OpenNet Initiative was a collaborative project focused on monitoring and reporting on internet filtering and surveillance practices employed by nations worldwide. Their research helped document the global landscape of internet censorship.

What is the purpose of the 'Freedom on the Net' reports published by Freedom House?

Answer: To rate countries based on their internet freedom, including content limits and user rights.

The 'Freedom on the Net' reports by Freedom House aim to assess and rate global internet freedom by evaluating factors such as access obstacles, content limitations, and user rights violations within various countries.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the 'Freedom on the Net' reports published by Freedom House?: The 'Freedom on the Net' reports provide analytical assessments and numerical ratings on the state of internet freedom in countries worldwide. They evaluate obstacles to access, limits on content, and violations of user rights, categorizing countries as 'Free,' 'Partly Free,' or 'Not Free'.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) designates a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet' if its government:

Answer: Engages in systematic repression of internet users and violates freedom of information.

Reporters Without Borders designates a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet' when its government systematically represses internet users and infringes upon freedom of information, extending beyond mere censorship of news.

Related Concepts:

  • What criteria does Reporters Without Borders (RSF) use to designate a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet'?: RSF designates a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet' if its government not only censors news and information online but also engages in almost systematic repression of internet users, leading to grave violations of freedom of information and human rights.
  • What were the five 'State Enemies of the Internet' identified by Reporters Without Borders in March 2013?: In March 2013, Reporters Without Borders identified Bahrain, China, Iran, Syria, and Vietnam as 'State Enemies of the Internet' due to their governments' active surveillance and repression of news providers.
  • How do organizations like Reporters Without Borders (RSF) contribute to understanding internet censorship?: RSF advocates for press freedom and publishes lists such as 'Enemies of the Internet' and 'Countries Under Surveillance' to highlight nations that engage in systematic repression of internet users and violate freedom of information.

Which of the following was identified by Reporters Without Borders in March 2013 as a 'State Enemy of the Internet'?

Answer: Bahrain

In March 2013, Reporters Without Borders identified Bahrain among the 'State Enemies of the Internet' due to its government's systematic repression of online users and violations of freedom of information.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the five 'State Enemies of the Internet' identified by Reporters Without Borders in March 2013?: In March 2013, Reporters Without Borders identified Bahrain, China, Iran, Syria, and Vietnam as 'State Enemies of the Internet' due to their governments' active surveillance and repression of news providers.
  • What criteria does Reporters Without Borders (RSF) use to designate a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet'?: RSF designates a country as an 'Enemy of the Internet' if its government not only censors news and information online but also engages in almost systematic repression of internet users, leading to grave violations of freedom of information and human rights.
  • How do organizations like Reporters Without Borders (RSF) contribute to understanding internet censorship?: RSF advocates for press freedom and publishes lists such as 'Enemies of the Internet' and 'Countries Under Surveillance' to highlight nations that engage in systematic repression of internet users and violate freedom of information.

What does the V-Dem Digital Societies Project measure annually?

Answer: Various aspects of internet censorship, including disinformation and shutdowns.

The V-Dem Digital Societies Project annually measures diverse facets of internet censorship, encompassing disinformation campaigns, digital media freedom, state regulation, and the occurrence of internet shutdowns.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the V-Dem Digital Societies Project, and what does it measure?: The V-Dem Digital Societies Project is an annual report that measures various aspects of internet censorship, including misinformation online and internet shutdowns. It uses 35 indicators across five areas: disinformation, digital media freedom, state regulation of digital media, polarization of online media, and online social cleavages.

What key finding emerged from a 2010 BBC World Service global opinion poll regarding the internet?

Answer: The internet was viewed by most users as a force for good and freedom.

A 2010 BBC World Service poll revealed that the majority of global internet users perceived the internet primarily as a positive force for good and freedom, rather than a source of restriction.

Related Concepts:

  • What were some key findings from a 2010 BBC World Service global opinion poll regarding the internet?: The BBC poll found that most internet users globally viewed the internet as a force for good and a source of freedom. A majority (53%) believed the internet should never be regulated by any government, though opinions were divided on whether it was a safe place for expression.
  • What did the Internet Society's 2012 Global Internet User Survey reveal about user attitudes towards government control?: The Internet Society survey found that 82% of users agreed the internet should be governed to protect the community from harm, while 71% believed censorship should exist in some form. However, 77% agreed that increased government control would limit their access to content and 74% felt it would limit their freedom of expression.
  • What was the general sentiment regarding internet censorship and freedom in a 2012 Internet Society survey?: A 2012 Internet Society survey indicated a complex view among respondents: 71% agreed that censorship should exist in some form on the internet. Simultaneously, a strong majority believed internet access should be a basic human right (83%) and that freedom of expression should be guaranteed online (86%).

How did the Arab Spring uprisings influence internet censorship practices, according to the source?

Answer: It resulted in increased censorship, including internet shutdowns.

The extensive use of the internet during the Arab Spring uprisings led to heightened censorship measures in several countries, including the implementation of internet shutdowns, as authorities sought to control information flow.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Arab Spring uprisings influence internet censorship practices?: During the Arab Spring, the extensive use of internet and mobile technologies for organizing protests led to increased censorship, including complete internet shutdowns in countries like Egypt and Libya. While some countries moved off 'Internet Enemies' lists, warnings emerged that censorship might increase elsewhere.
  • How does the extent of internet censorship vary globally, and what are some examples of its application?: The extent of internet censorship differs significantly from country to country. Some nations practice moderate censorship, while others severely limit access to information, suppress discussions, and silence citizens, particularly during events like elections or protests, as seen during the Arab Spring.

What technical measure did Egypt employ during the 2011 revolution to block internet access?

Answer: Shutting down approximately 3500 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes.

During the 2011 Egyptian revolution, the government implemented a broad internet block by disabling approximately 3500 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes, effectively disconnecting large segments of the country's network.

Related Concepts:

  • What technical measures did Egypt employ during the 2011 revolution to block internet access?: During the 2011 Egyptian revolution, the government implemented an unprecedented internet block by shutting down approximately 3500 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes to Egyptian networks, effectively disconnecting much of the country without cutting major intercontinental fiber-optic links.

What is the 'splinternet' concept related to?

Answer: The fragmentation of the internet into national or regional networks.

The 'splinternet' concept describes the trend of the global internet fragmenting into separate national or regional networks, often driven by censorship policies and differing regulatory environments.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks. This fragmentation is often driven by national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept, and how does it relate to national firewalls?: The 'splinternet' refers to the idea that the global internet is fragmenting into separate national or regional networks, often due to national firewalls and censorship policies that restrict cross-border data flow and access.
  • What is the 'splinternet' concept in relation to internet censorship?: The term 'splinternet' is sometimes used to describe the fragmentation of the global internet into separate national or regional networks, often due to the implementation of national firewalls and censorship measures.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy