Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


The Kholop System in Russian History: Servitude and Social Structure

At a Glance

Title: The Kholop System in Russian History: Servitude and Social Structure

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Origins and Etymology of the Kholop Status: 7 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Kholops in Kievan Rus' (9th-12th Centuries): 7 flashcards, 16 questions
  • Transformation and Diversification (16th-18th Centuries): 6 flashcards, 10 questions
  • Categories of Kholop Servitude: 8 flashcards, 17 questions
  • Legal and Administrative Structures: 4 flashcards, 6 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 32
  • True/False Questions: 29
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 29
  • Total Questions: 58

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The Kholop System in Russian History: Servitude and Social Structure

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Kholop" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The Kholop System in Russian History: Servitude and Social Structure

Study Guide: The Kholop System in Russian History: Servitude and Social Structure

Origins and Etymology of the Kholop Status

During the Kievan Rus' period, a kholop was characterized as a form of feudal serfdom, subsequently evolving to exhibit slave-like attributes within the Tsardom of Russia.

Answer: True

The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

The etymological derivation of the term 'kholop' is associated with Slavic terms signifying 'master' or 'lord'.

Answer: False

The etymology of 'kholop' is actually linked to Slavic words that translate to 'boy' or 'young person', not 'master' or 'lord'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the etymological origin of the word 'kholop'?: The term 'kholop' is cognate with Slavic words that translate to 'man' or 'boy'. For instance, Ukrainian utilizes 'khlopets', Polish employs 'chłopie', and Bulgarian uses 'hlope' or 'hlapak', all denoting 'kid' or 'boy'. In Slovak, 'chlap' serves as a synonym for 'man'.
  • What does the term 'kholop' signify in the context of early Slavic social structures as presented in the sidebar?: Within the context of early Slavic social structures, the term 'kholop' signifies a slave, positioned at the lowest stratum of this hierarchy, below free tenants, retainers, nobles, and sovereigns.

Within the 'Early Slavic status' sidebar, is the kholop positioned as a social rank superior to that of a 'Smerd' (free tenant)?

Answer: False

The 'Early Slavic status' sidebar explicitly places the kholop at the bottom of the social hierarchy, below the Smerd (free tenant).

Related Concepts:

  • What does the sidebar 'Early Slavic status' list in relation to the kholop?: The 'Early Slavic status' sidebar enumerates various social ranks, including Knyaz (sovereign), Boyar/Szlachta (noble), Druzhinnik (retainer), Smerd (free tenant), and Kholop (slave), positioning the kholop at the lowest echelon of this hierarchy.

Is the semantic transition observed in the etymology of 'kholop', from 'young person' to 'servant', a linguistically unique phenomenon?

Answer: False

This semantic shift, where a term for 'young person' evolves to mean 'servant', is not unique and is paralleled in other languages, such as the English word 'boy'.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the etymology of 'kholop' relate to the concept of servitude?: The semantic transition from 'young person' to 'servant' observed in the etymology of 'kholop' is not unique; similar shifts occur in other languages, exemplified by the English word 'boy' when used to denote a domestic servant.

Is the term 'kholop' etymologically connected to the Polish word 'chłopie', which signifies 'boy'?

Answer: True

The term 'kholop' is cognate with Slavic words that translate to 'man' or 'boy'. For instance, Ukrainian utilizes 'khlopets', Polish employs 'chłopie', and Bulgarian uses 'hlope' or 'hlapak', all denoting 'kid' or 'boy'. In Slovak, 'chlap' serves as a synonym for 'man'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the etymological origin of the word 'kholop'?: The term 'kholop' is cognate with Slavic words that translate to 'man' or 'boy'. For instance, Ukrainian utilizes 'khlopets', Polish employs 'chłopie', and Bulgarian uses 'hlope' or 'hlapak', all denoting 'kid' or 'boy'. In Slovak, 'chlap' serves as a synonym for 'man'.
  • What does the term 'kholop' signify in the context of early Slavic social structures as presented in the sidebar?: Within the context of early Slavic social structures, the term 'kholop' signifies a slave, positioned at the lowest stratum of this hierarchy, below free tenants, retainers, nobles, and sovereigns.

The etymology of 'kholop' is linked to Slavic terms for 'boy' or 'man'. Which of the following terms is explicitly NOT mentioned in the source material as being related?

Answer: muzhik (Russian)

The etymology of 'kholop' is linked to Slavic words like 'khlopets' (Ukrainian) and 'chłopie' (Polish), but 'muzhik' (Russian) is not mentioned as a related term in this context.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the etymological origin of the word 'kholop'?: The term 'kholop' is cognate with Slavic words that translate to 'man' or 'boy'. For instance, Ukrainian utilizes 'khlopets', Polish employs 'chłopie', and Bulgarian uses 'hlope' or 'hlapak', all denoting 'kid' or 'boy'. In Slovak, 'chlap' serves as a synonym for 'man'.
  • What does the term 'kholop' signify in the context of early Slavic social structures as presented in the sidebar?: Within the context of early Slavic social structures, the term 'kholop' signifies a slave, positioned at the lowest stratum of this hierarchy, below free tenants, retainers, nobles, and sovereigns.

According to the 'Early Slavic status' sidebar, where is the kholop situated within the social hierarchy?

Answer: At the bottom, below the Smerd.

The 'Early Slavic status' sidebar designates the kholop's position within the social hierarchy as being at the bottom, subordinate to the Smerd (free tenant).

Related Concepts:

  • What does the sidebar 'Early Slavic status' list in relation to the kholop?: The 'Early Slavic status' sidebar enumerates various social ranks, including Knyaz (sovereign), Boyar/Szlachta (noble), Druzhinnik (retainer), Smerd (free tenant), and Kholop (slave), positioning the kholop at the lowest echelon of this hierarchy.
  • What does the term 'kholop' signify in the context of early Slavic social structures as presented in the sidebar?: Within the context of early Slavic social structures, the term 'kholop' signifies a slave, positioned at the lowest stratum of this hierarchy, below free tenants, retainers, nobles, and sovereigns.

Based on its etymology, what does the term 'kholop' appear to have originally signified?

Answer: It originated from a term signifying 'young person' or 'boy'.

The etymology of 'kholop' suggests it originally signified 'young person' or 'boy'.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'kholop' signify in the context of early Slavic social structures as presented in the sidebar?: Within the context of early Slavic social structures, the term 'kholop' signifies a slave, positioned at the lowest stratum of this hierarchy, below free tenants, retainers, nobles, and sovereigns.
  • When was the term 'kholop' first documented in historical records?: The earliest documented historical reference to the term 'kholop' appears in chronicles dating to the year 986 CE.
  • What happened to the various types of kholops over time in Muscovy?: Over time, all distinct categories of kholops were eventually subsumed under the legal status of 'Kabala kholops'.

The semantic transition from 'young person' to 'servant' observed in the etymology of 'kholop' is analogized to the usage of which English word?

Answer: Boy

The semantic shift from 'young person' to 'servant' observed in the etymology of 'kholop' is comparable to the usage of the English word 'boy', which has also been employed to refer to a domestic servant.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the etymology of 'kholop' relate to the concept of servitude?: The semantic transition from 'young person' to 'servant' observed in the etymology of 'kholop' is not unique; similar shifts occur in other languages, exemplified by the English word 'boy' when used to denote a domestic servant.
  • What does the term 'kholop' signify in the context of early Slavic social structures as presented in the sidebar?: Within the context of early Slavic social structures, the term 'kholop' signifies a slave, positioned at the lowest stratum of this hierarchy, below free tenants, retainers, nobles, and sovereigns.

Kholops in Kievan Rus' (9th-12th Centuries)

The earliest documented historical reference to the term 'kholop' dates to the 16th century.

Answer: False

Historical records indicate that the term 'kholop' was first documented considerably earlier, in the year 986 CE.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the term 'kholop' first documented in historical records?: The earliest documented historical reference to the term 'kholop' appears in chronicles dating to the year 986 CE.

The Russkaya Pravda, a seminal legal codification from the Kievan Rus' era, furnishes specific details concerning the status and classifications of kholops.

Answer: True

The Russkaya Pravda, a legal code originating from the late Kievan Rus' period, elaborates on the status and various types of kholops prevalent during that epoch, identifying them as dependent individuals, specifically slaves, between the 11th and 12th centuries.

Related Concepts:

  • What legal code from Kievan Rus' provides details about the status and types of kholops?: The Russkaya Pravda, a legal code originating from the late Kievan Rus' period, elaborates on the status and various types of kholops prevalent during that epoch, identifying them as dependent individuals, specifically slaves, between the 11th and 12th centuries.
  • How did the 'Russkaya Pravda' define the kholop's position in Kievan Rus'?: The 'Russkaya Pravda', a legal code of Kievan Rus', delineated the status and various types of kholops, classifying them as dependent individuals, particularly slaves, during the 11th-12th centuries.

Within the legal framework of Kievan Rus', did a kholop's master exercise absolute authority over the kholop's existence, encompassing the right to terminate their life, engage in sale, or transfer ownership for debt settlement?

Answer: True

In Kievan Rus', a kholop's master possessed unlimited authority over the kholop's life, which included the prerogative to kill them, sell them, or transfer ownership to satisfy a debt.

Related Concepts:

  • What power did a kholop's master possess over their life in Kievan Rus' according to the Russkaya Pravda?: In Kievan Rus', a kholop's master possessed unlimited authority over the kholop's life, which included the prerogative to kill them, sell them, or transfer ownership to satisfy a debt.

During the Kievan Rus' period, were masters absolved of responsibility for the transgressions committed by their kholops, such as acts of theft or insult?

Answer: False

Contrary to the assertion, masters in Kievan Rus' were indeed held accountable for the actions of their kholops, including offenses like theft or insults directed at freemen.

Related Concepts:

  • While masters had significant power, what responsibilities did they have for their kholops' actions in Kievan Rus'?: Despite the extensive power masters wielded over kholops, they were held responsible for their kholops' actions, such as if a kholop insulted a freeman or committed theft.

In Kievan Rus', what were the principal avenues through which an individual could attain the status of a kholop?

Answer: True

An individual could become a kholop in Kievan Rus' through various means: capture in warfare, voluntary self-sale into servitude, incurrence of debt, commission of criminal offenses, or by marrying an individual who was already a kholop.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the various ways an individual could become a kholop in Kievan Rus'?: An individual could become a kholop in Kievan Rus' through various means: capture in warfare, voluntary self-sale into servitude, incurrence of debt, commission of criminal offenses, or by marrying an individual who was already a kholop.

In Kievan Rus', was the involvement of kholops confined solely to agricultural labor on estates?

Answer: False

Kholops in Kievan Rus' were not exclusively involved in agricultural labor; some house serfs also engaged in trades, military service, and administrative duties.

Related Concepts:

  • Beyond agricultural labor, what other roles did some kholops fulfill in Kievan Rus'?: Beyond agricultural duties, certain kholops, particularly those serving as house serfs, were integrated into princely households, undertaking roles in the military, engaging in trades, or performing administrative functions.

During the Kievan Rus' period, were masters prohibited from selling their kholops to third parties or utilizing them for debt settlement?

Answer: False

In Kievan Rus', masters possessed the right to sell their kholops or transfer them to settle debts, reflecting the absolute power they held over them.

Related Concepts:

  • What power did a kholop's master possess over their life in Kievan Rus' according to the Russkaya Pravda?: In Kievan Rus', a kholop's master possessed unlimited authority over the kholop's life, which included the prerogative to kill them, sell them, or transfer ownership to satisfy a debt.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

Did the Russkaya Pravda, during the 11th-12th centuries, characterize kholops as dependent individuals, specifically identifying them as slaves?

Answer: True

The 'Russkaya Pravda', a legal code of Kievan Rus', delineated the status and various types of kholops, classifying them as dependent individuals, particularly slaves, during the 11th-12th centuries.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the 'Russkaya Pravda' define the kholop's position in Kievan Rus'?: The 'Russkaya Pravda', a legal code of Kievan Rus', delineated the status and various types of kholops, classifying them as dependent individuals, particularly slaves, during the 11th-12th centuries.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

During the Kievan Rus' period (9th to early 12th centuries), what constituted the primary definition of a 'kholop'?

Answer: A type of feudal serf.

The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.
  • How did the 'Russkaya Pravda' define the kholop's position in Kievan Rus'?: The 'Russkaya Pravda', a legal code of Kievan Rus', delineated the status and various types of kholops, classifying them as dependent individuals, particularly slaves, during the 11th-12th centuries.

In what specific year was the term 'kholop' first documented within historical chronicles?

Answer: 986

The earliest documented historical reference to the term 'kholop' appears in chronicles dating to the year 986 CE.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the term 'kholop' first documented in historical records?: The earliest documented historical reference to the term 'kholop' appears in chronicles dating to the year 986 CE.

As stipulated by the Russkaya Pravda, what degree of authority did a kholop's master exercise over the kholop's life within Kievan Rus'?

Answer: Absolute power, including the right to kill, sell, or transfer the kholop.

According to the Russkaya Pravda, a kholop's master in Kievan Rus' held absolute power over their life, including the right to kill them, sell them, or transfer them to settle debts.

Related Concepts:

  • What power did a kholop's master possess over their life in Kievan Rus' according to the Russkaya Pravda?: In Kievan Rus', a kholop's master possessed unlimited authority over the kholop's life, which included the prerogative to kill them, sell them, or transfer ownership to satisfy a debt.

Which specific legal code originating from Kievan Rus' offers substantial details regarding the status and classifications of kholops?

Answer: The Russkaya Pravda

The Russkaya Pravda, a legal code from the late Kievan Rus' period, details the status and types of kholops during that era.

Related Concepts:

  • What legal code from Kievan Rus' provides details about the status and types of kholops?: The Russkaya Pravda, a legal code originating from the late Kievan Rus' period, elaborates on the status and various types of kholops prevalent during that epoch, identifying them as dependent individuals, specifically slaves, between the 11th and 12th centuries.

Notwithstanding the considerable power wielded by masters over kholops in Kievan Rus', for which specific responsibility were they still held accountable?

Answer: Responsibility for their kholops' actions, such as theft or insults.

Although masters possessed considerable power over kholops in Kievan Rus', they were still accountable for their kholops' actions, including theft or insults.

Related Concepts:

  • What power did a kholop's master possess over their life in Kievan Rus' according to the Russkaya Pravda?: In Kievan Rus', a kholop's master possessed unlimited authority over the kholop's life, which included the prerogative to kill them, sell them, or transfer ownership to satisfy a debt.
  • While masters had significant power, what responsibilities did they have for their kholops' actions in Kievan Rus'?: Despite the extensive power masters wielded over kholops, they were held responsible for their kholops' actions, such as if a kholop insulted a freeman or committed theft.

Which of the following represents a common method by which an individual could attain kholop status in Kievan Rus'?

Answer: Being captured in war.

Among the common methods for an individual to become a kholop in Kievan Rus' was being captured in war.

Related Concepts:

  • What power did a kholop's master possess over their life in Kievan Rus' according to the Russkaya Pravda?: In Kievan Rus', a kholop's master possessed unlimited authority over the kholop's life, which included the prerogative to kill them, sell them, or transfer ownership to satisfy a debt.
  • What legal code from Kievan Rus' provides details about the status and types of kholops?: The Russkaya Pravda, a legal code originating from the late Kievan Rus' period, elaborates on the status and various types of kholops prevalent during that epoch, identifying them as dependent individuals, specifically slaves, between the 11th and 12th centuries.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

Beyond agricultural labor, what alternative roles could kholops, particularly those serving as house serfs, undertake in Kievan Rus'?

Answer: Engaging in trades, military service, or administrative activities.

In Kievan Rus', some kholops, especially house serfs, fulfilled roles beyond agricultural labor, including engaging in trades, military service, or administrative activities.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.
  • Beyond agricultural labor, what other roles did some kholops fulfill in Kievan Rus'?: Beyond agricultural duties, certain kholops, particularly those serving as house serfs, were integrated into princely households, undertaking roles in the military, engaging in trades, or performing administrative functions.
  • What legal code from Kievan Rus' provides details about the status and types of kholops?: The Russkaya Pravda, a legal code originating from the late Kievan Rus' period, elaborates on the status and various types of kholops prevalent during that epoch, identifying them as dependent individuals, specifically slaves, between the 11th and 12th centuries.

Which of the following options was explicitly NOT enumerated as a method for becoming a kholop in Kievan Rus'?

Answer: Inheriting property from a noble relative.

Inheriting property from a noble relative was not listed as a way to become a kholop in Kievan Rus'.

Related Concepts:

  • What power did a kholop's master possess over their life in Kievan Rus' according to the Russkaya Pravda?: In Kievan Rus', a kholop's master possessed unlimited authority over the kholop's life, which included the prerogative to kill them, sell them, or transfer ownership to satisfy a debt.
  • What legal code from Kievan Rus' provides details about the status and types of kholops?: The Russkaya Pravda, a legal code originating from the late Kievan Rus' period, elaborates on the status and various types of kholops prevalent during that epoch, identifying them as dependent individuals, specifically slaves, between the 11th and 12th centuries.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

Transformation and Diversification (16th-18th Centuries)

Prior to the late 15th century, did kholops constitute a minority among the labor force on lordly estates in Kievan Rus'?

Answer: False

Contrary to the statement, until the late 15th century, kholops represented the majority of servants laboring on lordly lands.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the prevalence of kholops among servants in Kievan Rus' before the late 15th century?: Until the late 15th century, kholops constituted the majority among the servants engaged in labor on lordly estates.

By the 16th century, had the role of kholops within the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow experienced a significant increase due to their exploitation?

Answer: False

Conversely, by the 16th century, the role of kholops in the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow had diminished, largely owing to the intensified exploitation of peasant labor.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the role of kholops in the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow change by the 16th century?: By the 16th century, the function of kholops within the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow had diminished, a trend attributed to the escalating exploitation of peasant labor.

Following the implementation of the poll tax in the early 18th century, did house serfs who also held kholop status retain their distinct legal standing without alteration?

Answer: False

The introduction of the poll tax in the early 18th century led to the reclassification of house serfs (who were also kholops) as ordinary serfs, known as 'krepostnyye'.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to house serfs who were also kholops in relation to taxation and status in the early 18th century?: In the early 18th century, house serfs were subjected to a poll tax ('podushnaya podat') and subsequently reclassified as ordinary serfs, referred to as 'krepostnyye' or 'permanent peasants'.

Did all distinct categories of kholops in Muscovy eventually become consolidated under the legal designation of 'Kabala kholops' over time?

Answer: True

Over time, all distinct categories of kholops in Muscovy were eventually subsumed under the legal status of 'Kabala kholops'.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to the various types of kholops over time in Muscovy?: Over time, all distinct categories of kholops were eventually subsumed under the legal status of 'Kabala kholops'.

In the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia, was the legal status of kholops markedly distinct from and less severe than that of slaves?

Answer: False

The legal status of kholops in the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia was essentially equivalent to that of slaves, not significantly different or less severe.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the provided text, what was the legal status of kholops in the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia?: In the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia, the legal status accorded to kholops was, for all practical purposes, identical to that of slaves.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.
  • How did the 'Russkaya Pravda' define the kholop's position in Kievan Rus'?: The 'Russkaya Pravda', a legal code of Kievan Rus', delineated the status and various types of kholops, classifying them as dependent individuals, particularly slaves, during the 11th-12th centuries.

Prior to the late 15th century, what was the relative prevalence of kholops within the servant population on lordly estates?

Answer: They constituted the majority.

Until the late 15th century, kholops constituted the majority among the servants engaged in labor on lordly estates.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the prevalence of kholops among servants in Kievan Rus' before the late 15th century?: Until the late 15th century, kholops constituted the majority among the servants engaged in labor on lordly estates.
  • According to the provided text, what was the legal status of kholops in the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia?: In the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia, the legal status accorded to kholops was, for all practical purposes, identical to that of slaves.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

What transformation occurred regarding the role of kholops within the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow by the 16th century?

Answer: It diminished due to the increasing exploitation of peasant labor.

By the 16th century, the role of kholops in the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow had diminished, a consequence of the increasing exploitation of peasant labor.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the role of kholops in the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow change by the 16th century?: By the 16th century, the function of kholops within the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow had diminished, a trend attributed to the escalating exploitation of peasant labor.
  • What was the 'service class' of kholops that emerged in the 16th century?: The 'service class' of kholops, designated in Russian as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', began to manifest and disseminate across the nation during the 16th century, signifying a notable evolution in their roles.
  • What was the significance of the 'Kholop Prikaz'?: The 'Kholop Prikaz' functioned as an administrative department within Muscovy, addressing matters pertaining to kholops. Its destruction in 1682 is a documented historical event.

Subsequent to the introduction of the poll tax ('podushnaya podat') between 1722 and 1724, what was the treatment of house serfs who also held kholop status?

Answer: They were reclassified and treated as ordinary serfs ('krepostnyye').

Following the introduction of the poll tax ('podushnaya podat') in 1722-1724, house serfs who were also kholops were reclassified and treated as ordinary serfs ('krepostnyye').

Related Concepts:

  • What was the ultimate fate of house serfs in the early 18th century regarding their status?: Following the implementation of a poll tax in 1722-1724, house serfs were reclassified and treated as ordinary serfs, known as 'krepostnyye' or 'permanent peasants'.
  • What happened to house serfs who were also kholops in relation to taxation and status in the early 18th century?: In the early 18th century, house serfs were subjected to a poll tax ('podushnaya podat') and subsequently reclassified as ordinary serfs, referred to as 'krepostnyye' or 'permanent peasants'.
  • What characterized the 'implanted' kholops (posazhenniye na zemlyu) in the late 17th century?: In the late 17th century, 'implanted' kholops, designated as 'posazhenniye na zemlyu', were assigned to specific land parcels. They were permitted to manage their own households and were required to remit a quitrent, known as 'chynsh'.

In the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia, how did the legal status of kholops compare to the status of slaves?

Answer: It was essentially the same as that of slaves.

In the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia, the legal status accorded to kholops was, for all practical purposes, identical to that of slaves.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the provided text, what was the legal status of kholops in the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia?: In the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia, the legal status accorded to kholops was, for all practical purposes, identical to that of slaves.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.
  • How did the 'Russkaya Pravda' define the kholop's position in Kievan Rus'?: The 'Russkaya Pravda', a legal code of Kievan Rus', delineated the status and various types of kholops, classifying them as dependent individuals, particularly slaves, during the 11th-12th centuries.

According to the provided information, what was the eventual fate of the various types of kholops in Muscovy over time?

Answer: They were eventually categorized under the status of 'Kabala kholops'.

Over time, all types of kholops were eventually categorized under the status of 'Kabala kholops'.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the role of kholops in the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow change by the 16th century?: By the 16th century, the function of kholops within the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow had diminished, a trend attributed to the escalating exploitation of peasant labor.
  • What was the significance of the 'Kholop Prikaz'?: The 'Kholop Prikaz' functioned as an administrative department within Muscovy, addressing matters pertaining to kholops. Its destruction in 1682 is a documented historical event.
  • What was the 'service class' of kholops that emerged in the 16th century?: The 'service class' of kholops, designated in Russian as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', began to manifest and disseminate across the nation during the 16th century, signifying a notable evolution in their roles.

Categories of Kholop Servitude

Did the 'service class' of kholops, known as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', commence its emergence and proliferation throughout Russia during the 16th century?

Answer: True

The 'service class' of kholops, designated in Russian as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', began to manifest and disseminate across the nation during the 16th century, signifying a notable evolution in their roles.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'service class' of kholops that emerged in the 16th century?: The 'service class' of kholops, designated in Russian as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', began to manifest and disseminate across the nation during the 16th century, signifying a notable evolution in their roles.

During the late 17th century, were 'implanted' kholops, or 'posazhenniye na zemlyu', exclusively tied to their master's immediate household, precluding them from managing their own affairs?

Answer: False

Contrary to this, 'implanted' kholops ('posazhenniye na zemlyu') in the late 17th century were assigned to land, permitted to manage their own households, and were obligated to pay quitrent.

Related Concepts:

  • What characterized the 'implanted' kholops (posazhenniye na zemlyu) in the late 17th century?: In the late 17th century, 'implanted' kholops, designated as 'posazhenniye na zemlyu', were assigned to specific land parcels. They were permitted to manage their own households and were required to remit a quitrent, known as 'chynsh'.

From the 16th to the 18th centuries, did 'Boevie kholopi', or 'combat slaves', function primarily as an armed retinue, offering personal protection to landowners?

Answer: True

'Boevie kholopi' served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for large and medium-sized landowners from the 16th to 18th centuries. They also performed military service alongside noblemen, forming a significant component of the 'Landed Army'.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the image caption 'Combat kholops in the 16th century' refer to?: The designation 'Boevie kholopi', translating to 'combat slaves', refers to individuals who, from the 16th century onwards, served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for landowners.
  • What was the function of 'boevie kholopi' (combat slaves)?: 'Boevie kholopi' served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for large and medium-sized landowners from the 16th to 18th centuries. They also performed military service alongside noblemen, forming a significant component of the 'Landed Army'.

Was the typical armament for combat kholops that of heavy cavalry, featuring swords and lances?

Answer: False

Combat kholops were generally equipped as mounted archers, often wearing quilted armor and caps, rather than as heavy cavalry.

Related Concepts:

  • How were combat kholops typically equipped for service?: Combat kholops were typically equipped as mounted archers, frequently wearing inexpensive quilted armor and caps.

In Muscovy, did 'Kabala people' or 'Kabala kholops' primarily enter servitude via military conscription?

Answer: False

'Kabala kholops' entered servitude primarily through debt bondage, specifically after receiving a monetary loan, not through military conscription.

Related Concepts:

  • What were 'Kabala people' or 'Kabala kholops' in Muscovy during the 15th-17th centuries?: 'Kabala people' represented a form of kholop servitude in Muscovy between the 15th and 17th centuries, characterized by entering into service under a condition of heavy debt bondage ('kabala') subsequent to receiving a monetary loan.
  • How did the concept of 'debt bondage' relate to kholops in Muscovy?: Debt bondage, known as 'kabala', was a significant factor in the status of kholops in Muscovy from the 15th to 17th centuries, where individuals entered servitude after receiving monetary loans.

Was the servitude of 'Kabala kholops' typically constrained by a fixed term, culminating in automatic emancipation thereafter?

Answer: False

The servitude of 'Kabala kholops' was generally not limited to a fixed term; it often persisted for life or until the creditor's death, particularly after the 1597 Ukaze.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the servitude of 'Kabala kholops' structured?: Individuals became 'Kabala kholops' by taking a monetary loan and agreeing to serve their creditor until the debt was fully repaid. This servitude was often for life, especially after the Ukaze of 1 February 1597, which stipulated servitude until the creditor's death.

Were 'Boevie kholopi' (combat slaves) considered an integral component of the 'Landed Army', undertaking military service concurrently with noblemen?

Answer: True

'Boevie kholopi' served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for large and medium-sized landowners from the 16th to 18th centuries. They also performed military service alongside noblemen, forming a significant component of the 'Landed Army'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the function of 'boevie kholopi' (combat slaves)?: 'Boevie kholopi' served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for large and medium-sized landowners from the 16th to 18th centuries. They also performed military service alongside noblemen, forming a significant component of the 'Landed Army'.
  • What does the image caption 'Combat kholops in the 16th century' refer to?: The designation 'Boevie kholopi', translating to 'combat slaves', refers to individuals who, from the 16th century onwards, served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for landowners.
  • Beyond agricultural labor, what other roles did some kholops fulfill in Kievan Rus'?: Beyond agricultural duties, certain kholops, particularly those serving as house serfs, were integrated into princely households, undertaking roles in the military, engaging in trades, or performing administrative functions.

Did the Ukaze of 1 February 1597, pertaining to 'Kabala kholops', stipulate that their servitude would conclude upon the complete repayment of the loan?

Answer: False

The Ukaze of 1 February 1597 did not establish that servitude would end upon loan repayment; rather, it often extended servitude, particularly until the creditor's death.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the servitude of 'Kabala kholops' structured?: Individuals became 'Kabala kholops' by taking a monetary loan and agreeing to serve their creditor until the debt was fully repaid. This servitude was often for life, especially after the Ukaze of 1 February 1597, which stipulated servitude until the creditor's death.

What characterized the 'service class' of kholops, known as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', which emerged during the 16th century?

Answer: Kholops who performed military or administrative duties.

The 'service class' of kholops, referred to as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', comprised individuals assigned to perform military or administrative duties.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'service class' of kholops that emerged in the 16th century?: The 'service class' of kholops, designated in Russian as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', began to manifest and disseminate across the nation during the 16th century, signifying a notable evolution in their roles.
  • What was the prevalence of kholops among servants in Kievan Rus' before the late 15th century?: Until the late 15th century, kholops constituted the majority among the servants engaged in labor on lordly estates.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

What were the defining characteristics of 'implanted' kholops, or 'posazhenniye na zemlyu', during the late 17th century?

Answer: They were assigned to land, managed their own households, and paid quitrent.

'Implanted' kholops ('posazhenniye na zemlyu') in the late 17th century were assigned to land, managed their own households, and paid a quitrent.

Related Concepts:

  • What characterized the 'implanted' kholops (posazhenniye na zemlyu) in the late 17th century?: In the late 17th century, 'implanted' kholops, designated as 'posazhenniye na zemlyu', were assigned to specific land parcels. They were permitted to manage their own households and were required to remit a quitrent, known as 'chynsh'.
  • What was the 'service class' of kholops that emerged in the 16th century?: The 'service class' of kholops, designated in Russian as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', began to manifest and disseminate across the nation during the 16th century, signifying a notable evolution in their roles.
  • How did the role of kholops in the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow change by the 16th century?: By the 16th century, the function of kholops within the corvée economy of the Principality of Moscow had diminished, a trend attributed to the escalating exploitation of peasant labor.

From the 16th to the 18th centuries, what constituted the primary function of 'boevie kholopi' (combat slaves)?

Answer: Serving as an armed retinue and providing personal protection for landowners.

The primary function of 'boevie kholopi' (combat slaves) was to serve as an armed retinue and provide personal protection for landowners.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the function of 'boevie kholopi' (combat slaves)?: 'Boevie kholopi' served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for large and medium-sized landowners from the 16th to 18th centuries. They also performed military service alongside noblemen, forming a significant component of the 'Landed Army'.
  • What does the image caption 'Combat kholops in the 16th century' refer to?: The designation 'Boevie kholopi', translating to 'combat slaves', refers to individuals who, from the 16th century onwards, served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for landowners.

What was the typical armament and equipment utilized by combat kholops for their service?

Answer: As mounted archers with quilted armor and caps.

Combat kholops were typically equipped as mounted archers, often wearing quilted armor and caps.

Related Concepts:

  • How were combat kholops typically equipped for service?: Combat kholops were typically equipped as mounted archers, frequently wearing inexpensive quilted armor and caps.

Between the 15th and 17th centuries in Muscovy, what was the defining characteristic of the servitude undertaken by 'Kabala kholops'?

Answer: Entering servitude due to heavy debt bondage after a monetary loan.

The servitude of 'Kabala kholops' in Muscovy between the 15th and 17th centuries was defined by entering into service due to heavy debt bondage following the receipt of a monetary loan.

Related Concepts:

  • What were 'Kabala people' or 'Kabala kholops' in Muscovy during the 15th-17th centuries?: 'Kabala people' represented a form of kholop servitude in Muscovy between the 15th and 17th centuries, characterized by entering into service under a condition of heavy debt bondage ('kabala') subsequent to receiving a monetary loan.
  • How did the concept of 'debt bondage' relate to kholops in Muscovy?: Debt bondage, known as 'kabala', was a significant factor in the status of kholops in Muscovy from the 15th to 17th centuries, where individuals entered servitude after receiving monetary loans.
  • According to the provided text, what was the legal status of kholops in the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia?: In the 16th-century Tsardom of Russia, the legal status accorded to kholops was, for all practical purposes, identical to that of slaves.

As per the Ukaze of 1 February 1597, what was the typical duration of servitude for individuals classified as 'Kabala kholops'?

Answer: Often for life, or until the creditor's death.

According to the Ukaze of 1 February 1597, the servitude of 'Kabala kholops' was often for life, or until the creditor's death, rather than a fixed term.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the servitude of 'Kabala kholops' structured?: Individuals became 'Kabala kholops' by taking a monetary loan and agreeing to serve their creditor until the debt was fully repaid. This servitude was often for life, especially after the Ukaze of 1 February 1597, which stipulated servitude until the creditor's death.
  • What were 'Kabala people' or 'Kabala kholops' in Muscovy during the 15th-17th centuries?: 'Kabala people' represented a form of kholop servitude in Muscovy between the 15th and 17th centuries, characterized by entering into service under a condition of heavy debt bondage ('kabala') subsequent to receiving a monetary loan.
  • How did the concept of 'debt bondage' relate to kholops in Muscovy?: Debt bondage, known as 'kabala', was a significant factor in the status of kholops in Muscovy from the 15th to 17th centuries, where individuals entered servitude after receiving monetary loans.

What is the English translation of the term 'Boevie kholopi', and what was their primary function?

Answer: 'Combat slaves', serving as an armed retinue and personal protection.

'Boevie kholopi' translates to 'combat slaves' and they served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for landowners.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the function of 'boevie kholopi' (combat slaves)?: 'Boevie kholopi' served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for large and medium-sized landowners from the 16th to 18th centuries. They also performed military service alongside noblemen, forming a significant component of the 'Landed Army'.
  • What does the image caption 'Combat kholops in the 16th century' refer to?: The designation 'Boevie kholopi', translating to 'combat slaves', refers to individuals who, from the 16th century onwards, served as an armed retinue and provided personal protection for landowners.

In the context of Muscovy, how does the concept of 'kabala' relate to kholops?

Answer: A form of debt bondage after receiving a monetary loan.

The concept of 'kabala' relates to kholops in Muscovy as a form of debt bondage entered into after receiving a monetary loan.

Related Concepts:

  • What were 'Kabala people' or 'Kabala kholops' in Muscovy during the 15th-17th centuries?: 'Kabala people' represented a form of kholop servitude in Muscovy between the 15th and 17th centuries, characterized by entering into service under a condition of heavy debt bondage ('kabala') subsequent to receiving a monetary loan.
  • How did the concept of 'debt bondage' relate to kholops in Muscovy?: Debt bondage, known as 'kabala', was a significant factor in the status of kholops in Muscovy from the 15th to 17th centuries, where individuals entered servitude after receiving monetary loans.
  • What happened to the various types of kholops over time in Muscovy?: Over time, all distinct categories of kholops were eventually subsumed under the legal status of 'Kabala kholops'.

Which description most accurately characterizes the 'implanted' kholops, or 'posazhenniye na zemlyu', during the late 17th century?

Answer: Kholops assigned to manage specific lands and pay quitrent.

'Implanted' kholops ('posazhenniye na zemlyu') of the late 17th century were characterized by their assignment to specific lands, the management of their own households, and the obligation to pay quitrent.

Related Concepts:

  • What characterized the 'implanted' kholops (posazhenniye na zemlyu) in the late 17th century?: In the late 17th century, 'implanted' kholops, designated as 'posazhenniye na zemlyu', were assigned to specific land parcels. They were permitted to manage their own households and were required to remit a quitrent, known as 'chynsh'.
  • What was the 'service class' of kholops that emerged in the 16th century?: The 'service class' of kholops, designated in Russian as 'sluzhiloye kholopstvo', began to manifest and disseminate across the nation during the 16th century, signifying a notable evolution in their roles.
  • What was a kholop?: The term 'kholop' initially denoted a type of feudal serf prevalent in Kievan Rus' from the 9th to the early 12th centuries. By the 16th century, within the Tsardom of Russia, the legal standing of kholops had converged with that of slaves.

Legal and Administrative Structures

Does the depiction titled 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz' represent an event that transpired in the year 1682?

Answer: True

The image designated 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz' illustrates an event that took place in 1682, marking the dismantling of this administrative department.

Related Concepts:

  • What event is depicted in the image titled 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz'?: The image designated 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz' illustrates an event that took place in 1682, marking the dismantling of this administrative department.
  • What was the significance of the 'Kholop Prikaz'?: The 'Kholop Prikaz' functioned as an administrative department within Muscovy, addressing matters pertaining to kholops. Its destruction in 1682 is a documented historical event.

Were historical agreements pertaining to 'Kabala kholops' formally inscribed within documents designated as 'Sudebniks'?

Answer: False

Agreements concerning 'Kabala kholops' were not recorded in 'Sudebniks', but rather in specific ledgers known as 'Kabala books'.

Related Concepts:

  • Where were agreements concerning 'Kabala kholops' officially recorded?: Agreements related to 'Kabala kholops' were officially inscribed in specific ledgers referred to as 'Kabala books'.
  • What legal documents governed the status of 'Kabala kholops'?: The legal status of 'Kabala kholops' was regulated by general kholop norms and laws found in the Sudebnik of 1550 and the Sobornoye Ulozheniye of 1649, but agreements were recorded in 'Kabala books'.

Was the 'Kholop Prikaz' constituted as a judicial body tasked with adjudicating disputes arising between kholops and their masters?

Answer: False

The 'Kholop Prikaz' was an administrative department in Muscovy concerned with matters related to kholops, not a judicial body for adjudicating disputes between kholops and masters.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 'Kholop Prikaz'?: The 'Kholop Prikaz' functioned as an administrative department within Muscovy, addressing matters pertaining to kholops. Its destruction in 1682 is a documented historical event.

In the year 1682, which administrative department specifically concerned with kholops was dismantled?

Answer: The Kholop Prikaz

In 1682, the Kholop Prikaz, an administrative department related to kholops, was destroyed.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 'Kholop Prikaz'?: The 'Kholop Prikaz' functioned as an administrative department within Muscovy, addressing matters pertaining to kholops. Its destruction in 1682 is a documented historical event.
  • What event is depicted in the image titled 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz'?: The image designated 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz' illustrates an event that took place in 1682, marking the dismantling of this administrative department.

In what specific locations or documents were official agreements pertaining to 'Kabala kholops' inscribed?

Answer: In specific ledgers known as 'Kabala books'.

Agreements concerning 'Kabala kholops' were inscribed in specific ledgers known as 'Kabala books'.

Related Concepts:

  • Where were agreements concerning 'Kabala kholops' officially recorded?: Agreements related to 'Kabala kholops' were officially inscribed in specific ledgers referred to as 'Kabala books'.
  • What legal documents governed the status of 'Kabala kholops'?: The legal status of 'Kabala kholops' was regulated by general kholop norms and laws found in the Sudebnik of 1550 and the Sobornoye Ulozheniye of 1649, but agreements were recorded in 'Kabala books'.
  • What happened to the various types of kholops over time in Muscovy?: Over time, all distinct categories of kholops were eventually subsumed under the legal status of 'Kabala kholops'.

In 1682, which administrative department specifically pertaining to kholops was destroyed?

Answer: The Kholop Prikaz

In 1682, the Kholop Prikaz, an administrative department related to kholops, was destroyed.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 'Kholop Prikaz'?: The 'Kholop Prikaz' functioned as an administrative department within Muscovy, addressing matters pertaining to kholops. Its destruction in 1682 is a documented historical event.
  • What event is depicted in the image titled 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz'?: The image designated 'Destruction of the Kholop Prikaz' illustrates an event that took place in 1682, marking the dismantling of this administrative department.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy