Related Concepts:

• Where and when did the killing of Kate Steinle occur?: Kate Steinle was shot and killed on July 1, 2015, at approximately 6:30 p.m. while walking along Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco, California.
• What event is documented in the provided text?: The provided text details the killing of Kathryn "Kate" Steinle, a 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed on July 1, 2015.
• What was the date of Kate Steinle's funeral?: Kate Steinle's funeral was held on July 9, 2015, at a winery in Pleasanton.

Related Concepts:

• How was Kate Steinle killed?: Kate Steinle was killed by a single gunshot wound to the back, which pierced her aorta. She died two hours later in the hospital due to her injuries.
• What specific medical condition resulted from the gunshot wound?: The bullet struck Kate Steinle in the back and pierced her aorta, leading to her death.
• What specific details did the investigation reveal about the bullet's path?: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet, after being fired, struck the concrete pier 12-15 feet away from the shooter, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle in the back.

Related Concepts:

• What was Kate Steinle's background?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old at the time of her death. She was originally from Pleasanton, California, grew up partly in Germany, and held a communications degree from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She was employed by Medtronic in San Francisco and lived near Pier 14.
• What was the date of Kate Steinle's funeral?: Kate Steinle's funeral was held on July 9, 2015, at a winery in Pleasanton.
• What was the age of Kate Steinle when she was killed?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old.

Related Concepts:

• What was the distance between Kate Steinle and the shooter when she was hit?: Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet (27 meters) away from José Inéz García Zárate when she was struck by the bullet.
• What specific details did the investigation reveal about the bullet's path?: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet, after being fired, struck the concrete pier 12-15 feet away from the shooter, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle in the back.
• How was Kate Steinle killed?: Kate Steinle was killed by a single gunshot wound to the back, which pierced her aorta. She died two hours later in the hospital due to her injuries.

Related Concepts:

• What specific medical condition resulted from the gunshot wound?: The bullet struck Kate Steinle in the back and pierced her aorta, leading to her death.
• How was Kate Steinle killed?: Kate Steinle was killed by a single gunshot wound to the back, which pierced her aorta. She died two hours later in the hospital due to her injuries.
• What specific details did the investigation reveal about the bullet's path?: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet, after being fired, struck the concrete pier 12-15 feet away from the shooter, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle in the back.

Related Concepts:

• What was the date of Kate Steinle's funeral?: Kate Steinle's funeral was held on July 9, 2015, at a winery in Pleasanton.
• Where and when did the killing of Kate Steinle occur?: Kate Steinle was shot and killed on July 1, 2015, at approximately 6:30 p.m. while walking along Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco, California.
• What was Kate Steinle's background?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old at the time of her death. She was originally from Pleasanton, California, grew up partly in Germany, and held a communications degree from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She was employed by Medtronic in San Francisco and lived near Pier 14.

Related Concepts:

• What was the date of the shooting?: The shooting occurred on July 1, 2015.

Related Concepts:

• What was the name of the pier where the shooting took place?: The shooting took place at Pier 14.

Related Concepts:

• What was the age of Kate Steinle when she was killed?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old.
• What was Kate Steinle's background?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old at the time of her death. She was originally from Pleasanton, California, grew up partly in Germany, and held a communications degree from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She was employed by Medtronic in San Francisco and lived near Pier 14.
• Where and when did the killing of Kate Steinle occur?: Kate Steinle was shot and killed on July 1, 2015, at approximately 6:30 p.m. while walking along Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco, California.

Related Concepts:

• Where and when did the killing of Kate Steinle occur?: Kate Steinle was shot and killed on July 1, 2015, at approximately 6:30 p.m. while walking along Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco, California.
• What event is documented in the provided text?: The provided text details the killing of Kathryn "Kate" Steinle, a 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed on July 1, 2015.
• How was Kate Steinle killed?: Kate Steinle was killed by a single gunshot wound to the back, which pierced her aorta. She died two hours later in the hospital due to her injuries.

Related Concepts:

• How was Kate Steinle killed?: Kate Steinle was killed by a single gunshot wound to the back, which pierced her aorta. She died two hours later in the hospital due to her injuries.
• What specific medical condition resulted from the gunshot wound?: The bullet struck Kate Steinle in the back and pierced her aorta, leading to her death.
• Where and when did the killing of Kate Steinle occur?: Kate Steinle was shot and killed on July 1, 2015, at approximately 6:30 p.m. while walking along Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco, California.

Related Concepts:

• What was the distance between Kate Steinle and the shooter when she was hit?: Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet (27 meters) away from José Inéz García Zárate when she was struck by the bullet.
• What specific details did the investigation reveal about the bullet's path?: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet, after being fired, struck the concrete pier 12-15 feet away from the shooter, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle in the back.
• How was Kate Steinle killed?: Kate Steinle was killed by a single gunshot wound to the back, which pierced her aorta. She died two hours later in the hospital due to her injuries.

Related Concepts:

• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.
• What was the alleged cause of the shooting according to the accused?: The accused, José Inez García Zárate, claimed that he found the gun wrapped in cloth beneath a bench where he was sitting, and that the weapon discharged accidentally when he picked it up. He stated the bullet ricocheted off the concrete pier deck and struck Steinle, who was about 90 feet away.
• What was the significance of the SIG Sauer P239 handgun's firing mechanism in the trial?: The defense highlighted that the Sig Sauer P239 had no external safety mechanism and could be fired in single-action mode, which requires less trigger pressure. This was used to support the argument that the gun could have discharged accidentally when García Zárate picked it up.

Related Concepts:

• Who was accused of shooting Kate Steinle?: José Inez García Zárate, also known as Juan Francisco López-Sánchez, was accused of shooting Kate Steinle.
• What was the distance between Kate Steinle and the shooter when she was hit?: Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet (27 meters) away from José Inéz García Zárate when she was struck by the bullet.
• What was the alleged cause of the shooting according to the accused?: The accused, José Inez García Zárate, claimed that he found the gun wrapped in cloth beneath a bench where he was sitting, and that the weapon discharged accidentally when he picked it up. He stated the bullet ricocheted off the concrete pier deck and struck Steinle, who was about 90 feet away.

Related Concepts:

• What was José Inéz García Zárate's immigration history?: García Zárate was an undocumented immigrant from Guanajuato, Mexico. He had been deported from the U.S. five times previously, with the most recent deportation occurring in 2009. He had a history of felony convictions, including drug charges.
• How did San Francisco's sanctuary city policy relate to García Zárate's release?: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for García Zárate, requesting he be held for deportation. However, San Francisco's "Due Process for All" ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE unless an immigrant had both current and past violent felony charges. Consequently, the city disregarded the detainer and released him from county jail on April 15, 2015, despite ICE's request.
• What was the final deportation count for José Inéz García Zárate mentioned in the text?: The text states that García Zárate was deported from the United States for the seventh time on March 1, 2024.

Related Concepts:

• What was the final deportation count for José Inéz García Zárate mentioned in the text?: The text states that García Zárate was deported from the United States for the seventh time on March 1, 2024.
• What was José Inéz García Zárate's immigration history?: García Zárate was an undocumented immigrant from Guanajuato, Mexico. He had been deported from the U.S. five times previously, with the most recent deportation occurring in 2009. He had a history of felony convictions, including drug charges.
• What warning did federal judge Vince Chhabria give García Zárate at his sentencing?: Judge Chhabria warned García Zárate that if he returned to the United States again and appeared before him, he would not be spared, and stated, "Let this be your last warning: do not return to this country."

Related Concepts:

• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.
• Who was accused of shooting Kate Steinle?: José Inez García Zárate, also known as Juan Francisco López-Sánchez, was accused of shooting Kate Steinle.

Related Concepts:

• What was José Inéz García Zárate's immigration history?: García Zárate was an undocumented immigrant from Guanajuato, Mexico. He had been deported from the U.S. five times previously, with the most recent deportation occurring in 2009. He had a history of felony convictions, including drug charges.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.
• How did San Francisco's sanctuary city policy relate to García Zárate's release?: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for García Zárate, requesting he be held for deportation. However, San Francisco's "Due Process for All" ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE unless an immigrant had both current and past violent felony charges. Consequently, the city disregarded the detainer and released him from county jail on April 15, 2015, despite ICE's request.

Related Concepts:

• What event is documented in the provided text?: The provided text details the killing of Kathryn "Kate" Steinle, a 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed on July 1, 2015.
• Where and when did the killing of Kate Steinle occur?: Kate Steinle was shot and killed on July 1, 2015, at approximately 6:30 p.m. while walking along Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco, California.
• How was Kate Steinle killed?: Kate Steinle was killed by a single gunshot wound to the back, which pierced her aorta. She died two hours later in the hospital due to her injuries.
• What was the alleged cause of the shooting according to the accused?: The accused, José Inez García Zárate, claimed that he found the gun wrapped in cloth beneath a bench where he was sitting, and that the weapon discharged accidentally when he picked it up. He stated the bullet ricocheted off the concrete pier deck and struck Steinle, who was about 90 feet away.
• Who was accused of shooting Kate Steinle?: José Inez García Zárate, also known as Juan Francisco López-Sánchez, was accused of shooting Kate Steinle.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.
• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What federal charges did García Zárate face, and what was the outcome?: Federal charges included involuntary manslaughter, assault with a deadly weapon, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. The manslaughter and assault charges were dropped due to lack of evidence. He later pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What was the final sentence for García Zárate in the federal case?: On June 6, 2022, a federal judge sentenced García Zárate to seven years in jail, which legally closed the case as it accounted for the time he had already served.
• What was Kate Steinle's background?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old at the time of her death. She was originally from Pleasanton, California, grew up partly in Germany, and held a communications degree from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She was employed by Medtronic in San Francisco and lived near Pier 14.
• What was the origin of the firearm used in the shooting?: The .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239 handgun used in the shooting was stolen from a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ranger's personal vehicle in downtown San Francisco on June 27, 2015, just four days before the incident.
• What did the BLM ranger, John Woychowski, testify about regarding the stolen firearm?: Ranger Woychowski testified that he had left the firearm holstered in a backpack under the front seat of his personal vehicle while he went to dinner with his family. He reported the theft immediately to the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI.
• What was José Inéz García Zárate's immigration history?: García Zárate was an undocumented immigrant from Guanajuato, Mexico. He had been deported from the U.S. five times previously, with the most recent deportation occurring in 2009. He had a history of felony convictions, including drug charges.
• How did San Francisco's sanctuary city policy relate to García Zárate's release?: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for García Zárate, requesting he be held for deportation. However, San Francisco's "Due Process for All" ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE unless an immigrant had both current and past violent felony charges. Consequently, the city disregarded the detainer and released him from county jail on April 15, 2015, despite ICE's request.
• What was the significance of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: This ordinance restricted the San Francisco Sheriff's Department's cooperation with ICE, limiting it to cases where an immigrant faced current violent felony charges and had prior violent felony convictions. This policy led to García Zárate's release despite an ICE detainer.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.
• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.
• What did a San Francisco Police Department crime lab supervisor testify about the firearm?: The supervising criminologist testified that the gun was in excellent condition and would not have fired unless the trigger was pulled, contradicting the defense's claim of an accidental discharge without user interaction.
• What was the prosecution's stance on the bullet's trajectory?: The prosecution contended that the gun was brought to the crime scene intentionally and that the shot was aimed at Steinle. They presented evidence that the bullet ricocheted off the concrete pier before striking her.
• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
• How did the killing of Kate Steinle impact political discourse?: The killing sparked significant political debate, particularly concerning San Francisco's sanctuary city policy and the immigration status of the accused. Several Republican presidential candidates, including Donald Trump, cited the incident to advocate for stricter immigration enforcement and border security.
• What was "Kate's Law"?: "Kate's Law" refers to proposed legislation, such as H.R. 3011 introduced by Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Matt Salmon, aimed at establishing mandatory minimum sentences for illegal reentry into the United States. The law was named in honor of Kate Steinle.
• Did Kate Steinle's family support the political use of her name?: According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Kate Steinle's family did not wish for her death to become a political controversy and stated that they did not coin the term "Kate's Law."
• What was the result of the family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco?: The Steinle family filed a lawsuit alleging complicity and negligence. While some claims against the Bureau of Land Management were initially allowed to proceed, the family's claims against the City of San Francisco were ultimately dismissed, a decision upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in January 2020.
• What specific details did the investigation reveal about the bullet's path?: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet, after being fired, struck the concrete pier 12-15 feet away from the shooter, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle in the back.
• What was the role of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department in the events leading up to the shooting?: The San Francisco Sheriff's Department transported García Zárate to San Francisco County Jail on March 26, 2015, to face an old marijuana charge. Despite an ICE detainer requesting he be held for deportation, the department released him on April 15, 2015, due to the city's sanctuary city ordinance.
• How did Hillary Clinton react to the incident and San Francisco's policy?: Hillary Clinton, a 2016 presidential candidate, condemned San Francisco's sanctuary city policy, stating that the city made a mistake by not deporting an individual whom the federal government believed should be deported.
• What was the significance of the SIG Sauer P239 handgun's firing mechanism in the trial?: The defense highlighted that the Sig Sauer P239 had no external safety mechanism and could be fired in single-action mode, which requires less trigger pressure. This was used to support the argument that the gun could have discharged accidentally when García Zárate picked it up.
• What did the prosecution's firearms expert, John Evans, state regarding the bullet?: John Evans, the prosecution's firearms expert, testified that a divot in the recovered bullet indicated a ricochet had occurred and suggested it was possible the gunman was aiming at Steinle.
• What was the outcome of the federal charges against García Zárate?: Federal charges were unsealed after his state trial acquittal, including felon in possession of a firearm, involuntary manslaughter, and assault with a deadly weapon. He later pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What was the official classification of the incident in the infobox?: The infobox classifies the incident as an "Accidental homicide by shooting."
• What was the distance between Kate Steinle and the shooter when she was hit?: Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet (27 meters) away from José Inéz García Zárate when she was struck by the bullet.
• What specific medical condition resulted from the gunshot wound?: The bullet struck Kate Steinle in the back and pierced her aorta, leading to her death.
• Where was the gun recovered after the shooting?: The gun used in the shooting was recovered by divers from the San Francisco Police Department Underwater Recovery Unit in the bay alongside Pier 14 the day after the incident.
• What was the stated reason for the overturning of García Zárate's state gun conviction?: The conviction was overturned on appeal because the judge failed to instruct the jury on one of García Zárate's defenses.
• What warning did federal judge Vince Chhabria give García Zárate at his sentencing?: Judge Chhabria warned García Zárate that if he returned to the United States again and appeared before him, he would not be spared, and stated, "Let this be your last warning: do not return to this country."
• What was the purpose of the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office created by President Trump?: President Trump created the VOICE Office within ICE, mentioning Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens as part of the rationale for its establishment.
• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What was the stated reason for the San Francisco Sheriff's Department releasing García Zárate, according to Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi?: Sheriff Mirkarimi blamed federal prison and immigration officials for the series of events that led to García Zárate's release from custody.
• What did the prosecution's closing arguments focus on regarding the gun's condition?: The prosecution's closing arguments emphasized that the gun's trigger had to be pulled for it to fire, as testified by a criminologist.
• What did the defense call as their first witness after the prosecution rested?: The defense called the crime lab supervisor as their first witness after the prosecution rested its case.
• What was the specific type and caliber of the handgun used in the shooting?: The handgun used was a .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239.
• What was the date of Kate Steinle's funeral?: Kate Steinle's funeral was held on July 9, 2015, at a winery in Pleasanton.
• What was the primary argument made by Senator Dianne Feinstein regarding the incident?: Senator Feinstein argued that the tragic death of Kate Steinle could have been avoided if the San Francisco Sheriff's Department had notified ICE prior to releasing García Zárate, which would have allowed for his deportation.
• What action did President Trump take following his inauguration that mentioned Kate Steinle?: Following his inauguration, President Trump mentioned Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens when creating the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office within ICE.
• What was the stated purpose of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: The ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE, exempting the city from a federal program that held individuals for potential deportation based on immigration status unless they met specific criteria related to violent felony charges.
• What was the outcome of the lawsuit filed by the Steinle family against ICE?: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero dismissed the Steinle family's claim against ICE.
• What was the final deportation count for José Inéz García Zárate mentioned in the text?: The text states that García Zárate was deported from the United States for the seventh time on March 1, 2024.
• What did the defense experts suggest about the gun's firing mechanism?: Defense experts suggested that the Sig Sauer pistol, particularly when in single-action mode, required less trigger pressure, making an accidental discharge more plausible when the gun was being picked up or unwrapped.
• What was the date of the shooting?: The shooting occurred on July 1, 2015.
• What was the name of the pier where the shooting took place?: The shooting took place at Pier 14.
• What was the name of the city where the incident occurred?: The incident occurred in San Francisco, California.
• What was the age of Kate Steinle when she was killed?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old.
• What was the caliber of the handgun used in the shooting?: The handgun was a .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239.
• What was the primary political controversy surrounding the case?: The primary political controversy revolved around San Francisco's sanctuary city policy and the immigration status of the accused, José Inez García Zárate, who had been deported multiple times.

Related Concepts:

• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.

Related Concepts:

• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.

Related Concepts:

• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.
• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Related Concepts:

• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Related Concepts:

• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.
• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What was José Inéz García Zárate's immigration history?: García Zárate was an undocumented immigrant from Guanajuato, Mexico. He had been deported from the U.S. five times previously, with the most recent deportation occurring in 2009. He had a history of felony convictions, including drug charges.

Related Concepts:

• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.

Related Concepts:

• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.

Related Concepts:

• What was the stated reason for the overturning of García Zárate's state gun conviction?: The conviction was overturned on appeal because the judge failed to instruct the jury on one of García Zárate's defenses.
• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Related Concepts:

• What warning did federal judge Vince Chhabria give García Zárate at his sentencing?: Judge Chhabria warned García Zárate that if he returned to the United States again and appeared before him, he would not be spared, and stated, "Let this be your last warning: do not return to this country."

Related Concepts:

• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.

Related Concepts:

• What did the defense call as their first witness after the prosecution rested?: The defense called the crime lab supervisor as their first witness after the prosecution rested its case.

Related Concepts:

• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.

Related Concepts:

• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What was the stated reason for the overturning of García Zárate's state gun conviction?: The conviction was overturned on appeal because the judge failed to instruct the jury on one of García Zárate's defenses.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.

Related Concepts:

• What was the stated reason for the overturning of García Zárate's state gun conviction?: The conviction was overturned on appeal because the judge failed to instruct the jury on one of García Zárate's defenses.
• What was the legal outcome for José Inéz García Zárate regarding the murder and manslaughter charges?: After five days of deliberations, a jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges. Federal manslaughter and assault charges were also dropped due to lack of evidence.
• What was the final sentence for García Zárate in the federal case?: On June 6, 2022, a federal judge sentenced García Zárate to seven years in jail, which legally closed the case as it accounted for the time he had already served.

Related Concepts:

• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.
• What was the outcome of the jury deliberations in the state trial?: After five days of deliberations, the jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges but convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
• What was the stated reason for the overturning of García Zárate's state gun conviction?: The conviction was overturned on appeal because the judge failed to instruct the jury on one of García Zárate's defenses.

Related Concepts:

• What warning did federal judge Vince Chhabria give García Zárate at his sentencing?: Judge Chhabria warned García Zárate that if he returned to the United States again and appeared before him, he would not be spared, and stated, "Let this be your last warning: do not return to this country."
• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.

Related Concepts:

• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What charges were initially filed against García Zárate?: Initially, on July 6, García Zárate was formally charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics.
• What warning did federal judge Vince Chhabria give García Zárate at his sentencing?: Judge Chhabria warned García Zárate that if he returned to the United States again and appeared before him, he would not be spared, and stated, "Let this be your last warning: do not return to this country."

Related Concepts:

• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.
• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What was the significance of the SIG Sauer P239 handgun's firing mechanism in the trial?: The defense highlighted that the Sig Sauer P239 had no external safety mechanism and could be fired in single-action mode, which requires less trigger pressure. This was used to support the argument that the gun could have discharged accidentally when García Zárate picked it up.

Related Concepts:

• What did the BLM ranger, John Woychowski, testify about regarding the stolen firearm?: Ranger Woychowski testified that he had left the firearm holstered in a backpack under the front seat of his personal vehicle while he went to dinner with his family. He reported the theft immediately to the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the SIG Sauer P239 handgun's firing mechanism in the trial?: The defense highlighted that the Sig Sauer P239 had no external safety mechanism and could be fired in single-action mode, which requires less trigger pressure. This was used to support the argument that the gun could have discharged accidentally when García Zárate picked it up.
• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.
• What did a San Francisco Police Department crime lab supervisor testify about the firearm?: The supervising criminologist testified that the gun was in excellent condition and would not have fired unless the trigger was pulled, contradicting the defense's claim of an accidental discharge without user interaction.

Related Concepts:

• What did a San Francisco Police Department crime lab supervisor testify about the firearm?: The supervising criminologist testified that the gun was in excellent condition and would not have fired unless the trigger was pulled, contradicting the defense's claim of an accidental discharge without user interaction.
• What did the prosecution's closing arguments focus on regarding the gun's condition?: The prosecution's closing arguments emphasized that the gun's trigger had to be pulled for it to fire, as testified by a criminologist.

Related Concepts:

• What was the prosecution's stance on the bullet's trajectory?: The prosecution contended that the gun was brought to the crime scene intentionally and that the shot was aimed at Steinle. They presented evidence that the bullet ricocheted off the concrete pier before striking her.
• What specific details did the investigation reveal about the bullet's path?: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet, after being fired, struck the concrete pier 12-15 feet away from the shooter, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle in the back.
• What was the alleged cause of the shooting according to the accused?: The accused, José Inez García Zárate, claimed that he found the gun wrapped in cloth beneath a bench where he was sitting, and that the weapon discharged accidentally when he picked it up. He stated the bullet ricocheted off the concrete pier deck and struck Steinle, who was about 90 feet away.

Related Concepts:

• What specific details did the investigation reveal about the bullet's path?: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet, after being fired, struck the concrete pier 12-15 feet away from the shooter, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle in the back.
• What was the prosecution's stance on the bullet's trajectory?: The prosecution contended that the gun was brought to the crime scene intentionally and that the shot was aimed at Steinle. They presented evidence that the bullet ricocheted off the concrete pier before striking her.
• What was the distance between Kate Steinle and the shooter when she was hit?: Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet (27 meters) away from José Inéz García Zárate when she was struck by the bullet.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the SIG Sauer P239 handgun's firing mechanism in the trial?: The defense highlighted that the Sig Sauer P239 had no external safety mechanism and could be fired in single-action mode, which requires less trigger pressure. This was used to support the argument that the gun could have discharged accidentally when García Zárate picked it up.
• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.
• What did a San Francisco Police Department crime lab supervisor testify about the firearm?: The supervising criminologist testified that the gun was in excellent condition and would not have fired unless the trigger was pulled, contradicting the defense's claim of an accidental discharge without user interaction.

Related Concepts:

• What did the prosecution's firearms expert, John Evans, state regarding the bullet?: John Evans, the prosecution's firearms expert, testified that a divot in the recovered bullet indicated a ricochet had occurred and suggested it was possible the gunman was aiming at Steinle.

Related Concepts:

• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.
• What was the specific charge García Zárate pleaded guilty to in federal court?: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court.
• What conviction did José Inéz García Zárate receive in the state trial, and what happened to it?: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial. However, this conviction was later overturned on appeal on August 30, 2019.

Related Concepts:

• What did the prosecution's closing arguments focus on regarding the gun's condition?: The prosecution's closing arguments emphasized that the gun's trigger had to be pulled for it to fire, as testified by a criminologist.
• What did a San Francisco Police Department crime lab supervisor testify about the firearm?: The supervising criminologist testified that the gun was in excellent condition and would not have fired unless the trigger was pulled, contradicting the defense's claim of an accidental discharge without user interaction.
• What was the significance of the SIG Sauer P239 handgun's firing mechanism in the trial?: The defense highlighted that the Sig Sauer P239 had no external safety mechanism and could be fired in single-action mode, which requires less trigger pressure. This was used to support the argument that the gun could have discharged accidentally when García Zárate picked it up.

Related Concepts:

• What did the defense experts suggest about the gun's firing mechanism?: Defense experts suggested that the Sig Sauer pistol, particularly when in single-action mode, required less trigger pressure, making an accidental discharge more plausible when the gun was being picked up or unwrapped.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the SIG Sauer P239 handgun's firing mechanism in the trial?: The defense highlighted that the Sig Sauer P239 had no external safety mechanism and could be fired in single-action mode, which requires less trigger pressure. This was used to support the argument that the gun could have discharged accidentally when García Zárate picked it up.
• What was the defense's argument regarding the shooting?: The defense argued that the shooting was accidental, occurring when García Zárate picked up the gun he found under a bench. They emphasized that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily, especially if handled carelessly or if it was in single-action mode.

Related Concepts:

• What did the prosecution's firearms expert, John Evans, state regarding the bullet?: John Evans, the prosecution's firearms expert, testified that a divot in the recovered bullet indicated a ricochet had occurred and suggested it was possible the gunman was aiming at Steinle.

Related Concepts:

• What was the caliber of the handgun used in the shooting?: The handgun was a .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: This ordinance restricted the San Francisco Sheriff's Department's cooperation with ICE, limiting it to cases where an immigrant faced current violent felony charges and had prior violent felony convictions. This policy led to García Zárate's release despite an ICE detainer.
• How did Hillary Clinton react to the incident and San Francisco's policy?: Hillary Clinton, a 2016 presidential candidate, condemned San Francisco's sanctuary city policy, stating that the city made a mistake by not deporting an individual whom the federal government believed should be deported.
• What was the stated purpose of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: The ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE, exempting the city from a federal program that held individuals for potential deportation based on immigration status unless they met specific criteria related to violent felony charges.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: This ordinance restricted the San Francisco Sheriff's Department's cooperation with ICE, limiting it to cases where an immigrant faced current violent felony charges and had prior violent felony convictions. This policy led to García Zárate's release despite an ICE detainer.
• What was the stated purpose of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: The ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE, exempting the city from a federal program that held individuals for potential deportation based on immigration status unless they met specific criteria related to violent felony charges.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: This ordinance restricted the San Francisco Sheriff's Department's cooperation with ICE, limiting it to cases where an immigrant faced current violent felony charges and had prior violent felony convictions. This policy led to García Zárate's release despite an ICE detainer.
• How did San Francisco's sanctuary city policy relate to García Zárate's release?: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for García Zárate, requesting he be held for deportation. However, San Francisco's "Due Process for All" ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE unless an immigrant had both current and past violent felony charges. Consequently, the city disregarded the detainer and released him from county jail on April 15, 2015, despite ICE's request.
• What was the stated reason for the San Francisco Sheriff's Department releasing García Zárate, according to Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi?: Sheriff Mirkarimi blamed federal prison and immigration officials for the series of events that led to García Zárate's release from custody.

Related Concepts:

• What was the primary argument made by Senator Dianne Feinstein regarding the incident?: Senator Feinstein argued that the tragic death of Kate Steinle could have been avoided if the San Francisco Sheriff's Department had notified ICE prior to releasing García Zárate, which would have allowed for his deportation.
• What was the stated reason for the San Francisco Sheriff's Department releasing García Zárate, according to Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi?: Sheriff Mirkarimi blamed federal prison and immigration officials for the series of events that led to García Zárate's release from custody.
• Who was accused of shooting Kate Steinle?: José Inez García Zárate, also known as Juan Francisco López-Sánchez, was accused of shooting Kate Steinle.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: This ordinance restricted the San Francisco Sheriff's Department's cooperation with ICE, limiting it to cases where an immigrant faced current violent felony charges and had prior violent felony convictions. This policy led to García Zárate's release despite an ICE detainer.

Related Concepts:

• What was the significance of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: This ordinance restricted the San Francisco Sheriff's Department's cooperation with ICE, limiting it to cases where an immigrant faced current violent felony charges and had prior violent felony convictions. This policy led to García Zárate's release despite an ICE detainer.
• What was the stated reason for the San Francisco Sheriff's Department releasing García Zárate, according to Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi?: Sheriff Mirkarimi blamed federal prison and immigration officials for the series of events that led to García Zárate's release from custody.
• How did San Francisco's sanctuary city policy relate to García Zárate's release?: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for García Zárate, requesting he be held for deportation. However, San Francisco's "Due Process for All" ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE unless an immigrant had both current and past violent felony charges. Consequently, the city disregarded the detainer and released him from county jail on April 15, 2015, despite ICE's request.

Related Concepts:

• What was the stated reason for the San Francisco Sheriff's Department releasing García Zárate, according to Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi?: Sheriff Mirkarimi blamed federal prison and immigration officials for the series of events that led to García Zárate's release from custody.
• What was the significance of the "Due Process for All" ordinance in San Francisco?: This ordinance restricted the San Francisco Sheriff's Department's cooperation with ICE, limiting it to cases where an immigrant faced current violent felony charges and had prior violent felony convictions. This policy led to García Zárate's release despite an ICE detainer.
• How did San Francisco's sanctuary city policy relate to García Zárate's release?: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for García Zárate, requesting he be held for deportation. However, San Francisco's "Due Process for All" ordinance restricted cooperation with ICE unless an immigrant had both current and past violent felony charges. Consequently, the city disregarded the detainer and released him from county jail on April 15, 2015, despite ICE's request.

Related Concepts:

• Did Kate Steinle's family support the political use of her name?: According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Kate Steinle's family did not wish for her death to become a political controversy and stated that they did not coin the term "Kate's Law."

Related Concepts:

• What was "Kate's Law"?: "Kate's Law" refers to proposed legislation, such as H.R. 3011 introduced by Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Matt Salmon, aimed at establishing mandatory minimum sentences for illegal reentry into the United States. The law was named in honor of Kate Steinle.

Related Concepts:

• Did Kate Steinle's family support the political use of her name?: According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Kate Steinle's family did not wish for her death to become a political controversy and stated that they did not coin the term "Kate's Law."
• What was "Kate's Law"?: "Kate's Law" refers to proposed legislation, such as H.R. 3011 introduced by Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Matt Salmon, aimed at establishing mandatory minimum sentences for illegal reentry into the United States. The law was named in honor of Kate Steinle.
• What was Kate Steinle's background?: Kate Steinle was 32 years old at the time of her death. She was originally from Pleasanton, California, grew up partly in Germany, and held a communications degree from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She was employed by Medtronic in San Francisco and lived near Pier 14.

Related Concepts:

• How did Hillary Clinton react to the incident and San Francisco's policy?: Hillary Clinton, a 2016 presidential candidate, condemned San Francisco's sanctuary city policy, stating that the city made a mistake by not deporting an individual whom the federal government believed should be deported.
• How did the killing of Kate Steinle impact political discourse?: The killing sparked significant political debate, particularly concerning San Francisco's sanctuary city policy and the immigration status of the accused. Several Republican presidential candidates, including Donald Trump, cited the incident to advocate for stricter immigration enforcement and border security.

Related Concepts:

• What was the purpose of the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office created by President Trump?: President Trump created the VOICE Office within ICE, mentioning Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens as part of the rationale for its establishment.
• What action did President Trump take following his inauguration that mentioned Kate Steinle?: Following his inauguration, President Trump mentioned Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens when creating the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office within ICE.

Related Concepts:

• What was the primary argument made by Senator Dianne Feinstein regarding the incident?: Senator Feinstein argued that the tragic death of Kate Steinle could have been avoided if the San Francisco Sheriff's Department had notified ICE prior to releasing García Zárate, which would have allowed for his deportation.

Related Concepts:

• What was the purpose of the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office created by President Trump?: President Trump created the VOICE Office within ICE, mentioning Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens as part of the rationale for its establishment.
• What action did President Trump take following his inauguration that mentioned Kate Steinle?: Following his inauguration, President Trump mentioned Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens when creating the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office within ICE.

Related Concepts:

• How did Hillary Clinton react to the incident and San Francisco's policy?: Hillary Clinton, a 2016 presidential candidate, condemned San Francisco's sanctuary city policy, stating that the city made a mistake by not deporting an individual whom the federal government believed should be deported.

Related Concepts:

• What was the purpose of the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office created by President Trump?: President Trump created the VOICE Office within ICE, mentioning Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens as part of the rationale for its establishment.
• What action did President Trump take following his inauguration that mentioned Kate Steinle?: Following his inauguration, President Trump mentioned Kate Steinle and other victims of violent crime by illegal aliens when creating the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office within ICE.

Related Concepts:

Related Concepts:

• What was the result of the family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco?: The Steinle family filed a lawsuit alleging complicity and negligence. While some claims against the Bureau of Land Management were initially allowed to proceed, the family's claims against the City of San Francisco were ultimately dismissed, a decision upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in January 2020.

Related Concepts:

• What was the outcome of the lawsuit filed by the Steinle family against ICE?: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero dismissed the Steinle family's claim against ICE.
• What was the result of the family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco?: The Steinle family filed a lawsuit alleging complicity and negligence. While some claims against the Bureau of Land Management were initially allowed to proceed, the family's claims against the City of San Francisco were ultimately dismissed, a decision upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in January 2020.

Related Concepts:

• What was the result of the family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco?: The Steinle family filed a lawsuit alleging complicity and negligence. While some claims against the Bureau of Land Management were initially allowed to proceed, the family's claims against the City of San Francisco were ultimately dismissed, a decision upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in January 2020.
• What was the outcome of the lawsuit filed by the Steinle family against ICE?: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero dismissed the Steinle family's claim against ICE.