Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
The Habsburg conquest of the Sanjak of Smederevo, occurring during the Austro-Turkish War of 1716-1718, served as the direct precursor to the establishment of the administrative entity known as the Kingdom of Serbia in 1718.
Answer: True
The Habsburg victory in the Austro-Turkish War of 1716-1718 resulted in the acquisition of the Sanjak of Smederevo, which was subsequently reorganized and established as the Kingdom of Serbia under Habsburg administration in 1718, formalized by the Treaty of Passarowitz.
The conclusion of Habsburg rule over the Kingdom of Serbia in 1739 was a consequence of the Treaty of Passarowitz.
Answer: False
Habsburg rule over the Kingdom of Serbia concluded in 1739 due to the Treaty of Belgrade, not the Treaty of Passarowitz, which marked the beginning of Habsburg rule in 1718.
The duration of the Habsburg administration over the Kingdom of Serbia extended for more than a century.
Answer: False
The Habsburg administration of the Kingdom of Serbia lasted for a period of 21 years, from 1718 to 1739, not over a century.
The Austro-Turkish War of 1737-1739 led to the Habsburgs retaining control over territories situated south of the Sava and Danube rivers.
Answer: False
The Austro-Turkish War of 1737-1739 resulted in the Habsburg monarchy losing territories south of the Sava and Danube rivers, leading to the end of their rule in Serbia.
The Kingdom of Serbia, existing from 1718 to 1739, represented a temporary administrative division established subsequent to the Habsburg conquest of the Ottoman Sanjak of Smederevo.
Answer: True
The Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) was indeed a temporary administrative division established after the Habsburg conquest of the Ottoman Sanjak of Smederevo.
Serbs actively participated in the Austro-Turkish War of 1716-1718, joining Habsburg troops and contributing to the territorial gains that followed.
Answer: True
Serbs actively participated in the Austro-Turkish War of 1716-1718, joining Habsburg troops and contributing to the territorial gains that followed.
In which year did the Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) cease to exist?
Answer: 1739
The Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) ceased to exist in 1739, following the conclusion of the Austro-Turkish War and the subsequent Treaty of Belgrade.
What was the political status of the Sanjak of Smederevo prior to its conquest by the Habsburgs in 1717?
Answer: An Ottoman province.
Prior to the Habsburg conquest in 1717, the Sanjak of Smederevo was an Ottoman province.
During which conflict did the Habsburgs temporarily gain control over parts of Serbia prior to 1718?
Answer: The Great Turkish War (1688-1689)
The Habsburgs temporarily controlled parts of Serbia before 1718 during the Great Turkish War (specifically the campaign of 1688-1689).
The administrative entity designated as the Kingdom of Serbia, operational between 1718 and 1739, functioned as a distinct province or crownland within the Habsburg Monarchy, rather than being directly integrated into the Kingdom of Hungary.
Answer: True
The Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) was administered as a separate crownland of the Habsburg Monarchy, distinct from the Kingdom of Hungary, though both were part of the larger Habsburg realm.
The territorial extent of the Kingdom of Serbia during the period 1718-1739 was primarily situated north of the Sava and Danube rivers.
Answer: False
The Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) primarily encompassed territories south of the Sava and Danube rivers, corresponding largely to the former Sanjak of Smederevo.
Belgrade functioned as the capital city of the Kingdom of Serbia for the entirety of its existence between 1718 and 1739.
Answer: True
Belgrade was indeed the capital city of the Kingdom of Serbia throughout the period of Habsburg administration from 1718 to 1739.
The Habsburg administration designated a governor to direct the actual governance of the Kingdom of Serbia.
Answer: True
The administration of the Kingdom of Serbia under Habsburg rule was indeed overseen by an appointed governor, who was supported by military-cameral administration and joint supervision from the Aulic War Council and Aulic Chamber.
Emperor Charles VI served as a governor of the Kingdom of Serbia during the Habsburg period.
Answer: False
Emperor Charles VI was the ruling monarch of the Habsburg Monarchy during the period when the Kingdom of Serbia existed, but he was not a direct governor. Governors like George Oliver de Wallis served under his reign.
The administration of the Kingdom of Serbia was conducted exclusively through a military-cameral system, lacking any civilian oversight.
Answer: False
The administration of the Kingdom of Serbia was not solely military-cameral; it involved joint supervision by the Aulic War Council and Aulic Chamber, indicating a complex administrative structure with elements beyond purely military control.
The Kingdom of Serbia was established upon territory that had previously constituted part of the Banat of Temeswar.
Answer: False
The Kingdom of Serbia was established on the territory of the former Ottoman Sanjak of Smederevo, not on territory previously part of the Banat of Temeswar, although some eastern areas conquered by the Habsburgs were administered separately as part of the Banat.
What was the principal political status of the Kingdom of Serbia during the period spanning 1718 to 1739?
Answer: A province or crownland of the Habsburg monarchy.
The primary political status of the Kingdom of Serbia between 1718 and 1739 was that of a province or crownland directly administered by the Habsburg monarchy.
What geographical region was primarily encompassed by the Kingdom of Serbia between 1718 and 1739?
Answer: The former Ottoman Sanjak of Smederevo, south of the Sava and Danube.
The Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) primarily encompassed the former Ottoman Sanjak of Smederevo, situated south of the Sava and Danube rivers.
What was the administrative structure jointly responsible for the oversight of the Kingdom of Serbia?
Answer: The Aulic War Council and the Aulic Chamber.
The Kingdom of Serbia was jointly overseen by the Aulic War Council and the Aulic Chamber, in conjunction with a local military-cameral administration.
Which of the following individuals held the position of governor for the Kingdom of Serbia under Habsburg administration?
Answer: George Oliver de Wallis
George Oliver de Wallis served as a governor of the Kingdom of Serbia under Habsburg rule. Emperor Charles VI was the ruling monarch, not a direct governor.
Which individual listed was NOT among the named governors of the Kingdom of Serbia between 1718 and 1739?
Answer: Prince Eugene of Savoy
Prince Eugene of Savoy was a prominent military leader of the Habsburgs but was not a governor of the Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739). The named governors were O'Dwyer, Charles Alexander, Schmettau, and Wallis.
The Serbian population within the Kingdom of Serbia experienced a significant population decline, decreasing from approximately 400,000 to 270,000 individuals during the Habsburg period of 1718-1739.
Answer: False
Contrary to the statement, the Serbian population experienced a significant increase during the Habsburg period, growing from an estimated 270,000 to 400,000 people.
The Serbian Militia, primarily comprised of individuals known as hajduks, was granted exemption from taxation in return for their military service.
Answer: True
The Serbian Militia, composed of hajduks, received privileges including tax exemption and grants of fertile land in exchange for their military service and borderland defense duties.
The economy of the Kingdom of Serbia during the Habsburg period was predominantly characterized by maritime trade and manufacturing.
Answer: False
The economy of the Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) was primarily agricultural, focusing on viticulture and cereal farming, rather than maritime trade and manufacturing.
Beekeeping constituted a minor economic activity in the Kingdom of Serbia, contributing minimally to the overall tax revenue.
Answer: False
Beekeeping was a highly significant economic activity in the Kingdom of Serbia, contributing substantially to tax revenue through the production of honey and beeswax, accounting for approximately one-third of the total tax income.
The Serbian Orthodox Metropolitanate of Belgrade received recognition from the Habsburg authorities during the period of their administration.
Answer: True
Habsburg religious policies acknowledged and organized both the Serbian Orthodox Metropolitanate of Belgrade and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Belgrade, indicating recognition of these communities.
The Caesarea privilegiata Societas Commerciorum Orientalium was a corporate entity that received concessions for mining operations within the Kingdom of Serbia.
Answer: True
The Caesarea privilegiata Societas Commerciorum Orientalium was indeed a company granted mining concessions in the Kingdom of Serbia, with notable shareholders including Charles Alexander.
The responsibilities of the Serbian Militia encompassed the defense of border regions, the preservation of internal order, and the safeguarding of the Great Road.
Answer: True
The duties of the Serbian Militia included defending borderlands, maintaining internal peace, and protecting the vital Great Road (Tsarigrad Road).
Estimates suggest that the population of Belgrade in the 1720s surpassed 50,000 inhabitants.
Answer: False
Estimates indicate that the population of Belgrade in the 1720s did not exceed 20,000 people, contrary to the assertion that it surpassed 50,000.
The currency utilized within the Kingdom of Serbia was the Dinar.
Answer: False
The currency used in the Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) was the Kreuzer, not the Dinar.
The Habsburg administration facilitated the economic integration of the Serbian populace, fostering the development of a Serbian middle class.
Answer: True
The Habsburg administration promoted economic integration and contributed to the growth of a Serb middle class through various reforms and policies.
What notable demographic transformation occurred in Serbia during the Habsburg administration from 1718 to 1739?
Answer: The population increased significantly, from about 270,000 to 400,000.
A significant demographic change was the rapid population increase, from an estimated 270,000 to 400,000 individuals, during the Habsburg period.
Which of the following was not among the advantages experienced by the Serbian populace under Habsburg administration from 1718 to 1739?
Answer: Full political independence from Habsburg oversight
Full political independence from Habsburg oversight was not a benefit experienced by the Serbian population; rather, they experienced an autonomous militia, economic integration, and the growth of a middle class.
Who comprised the Serbian Militia during the era of Habsburg administration?
Answer: A portion of the Serbian peasant population, specifically hajduks.
The Serbian Militia was constituted by a segment of the Serbian peasant population, specifically those identified as hajduks.
What principal privilege was granted to the hajduks who formed the Serbian Militia?
Answer: Exemption from taxation and fertile land grants.
The hajduks forming the Serbian Militia received the key privilege of exemption from taxation, coupled with grants of fertile land.
What was the predominant economic focus of the Kingdom of Serbia during the period 1718-1739?
Answer: Predominantly agriculture, including viticulture and cereal farming.
The primary economic focus of the Kingdom of Serbia (1718-1739) was agriculture, including viticulture and cereal farming.
Beyond agriculture, which economic sector held particular significance for the Kingdom of Serbia, contributing substantially to its tax revenue?
Answer: Beekeeping (honey and beeswax)
Beekeeping, yielding honey and beeswax, was a particularly economically significant sector, contributing approximately one-third of the tax revenue collected by the Habsburg authorities.
What was the estimated population of Belgrade during the 1720s?
Answer: Not exceeding 20,000 people.
The estimated population of Belgrade in the 1720s did not exceed 20,000 people.
What was the significance of the 'Great Road' (Tsarigrad Road) concerning the duties of the Serbian Militia?
Answer: It was a vital trade route that the militia was tasked with protecting.
The 'Great Road' (Tsarigrad Road) was a vital trade and communication route that the Serbian Militia was tasked with protecting, ensuring regional security and stability.
The Great Migrations of the Serbs were not influenced by the conclusion of Habsburg rule in 1739.
Answer: False
The Great Migrations of the Serbs, particularly the second major migration, were directly influenced by the end of Habsburg rule in 1739 and the subsequent return of the territory to Ottoman control.
Habsburg rule cultivated a consciousness of a distinct political identity among the Serbian population, which subsequently contributed to later resistance movements.
Answer: True
The Habsburg administration fostered a sense of separate political entity among the inhabitants, which is considered a contributing factor to later Serbian resistance movements against Ottoman rule.
To what primary historical event or circumstance is the 'second Great Migration of the Serbs' principally linked?
Answer: The end of Habsburg rule and the return to Ottoman control (1737-1739).
The 'second Great Migration of the Serbs' is primarily associated with the end of Habsburg rule in Serbia and the subsequent return of the territory to Ottoman control, occurring between 1737 and 1739.
The impact of the Habsburg administration on Serbian identity is characterized as fostering:
Answer: A consciousness of a separate political entity, fueling later resistance.
The Habsburg administration's impact on Serbian identity is described as fostering a consciousness of a separate political entity, which contributed to later resistance movements.
The Treaty of Belgrade, signed in 1739, signified the commencement of Habsburg rule over Serbia.
Answer: False
The Treaty of Belgrade in 1739 marked the conclusion of Habsburg rule over Serbia, leading to its return to Ottoman control. The Treaty of Passarowitz in 1718 marked the beginning of Habsburg rule.
The German designation for the Kingdom of Serbia during the Habsburg period was Regnum Serviae.
Answer: False
The German name for the Kingdom of Serbia during this period was Kőnigsreich Serbien. Regnum Serviae is the Latin name.
The Habsburgs acquired the territories of Bačka and western Syrmia from the Ottoman Empire through the provisions of the Treaty of Passarowitz in 1718.
Answer: True
The Treaty of Passarowitz in 1718 indeed resulted in the Habsburg acquisition of territories including Bačka and western Syrmia, alongside other gains.
The Serbian appellation for the Kingdom of Serbia during the Habsburg period was Kőnigsreich Serbien.
Answer: False
The Serbian name for the Kingdom of Serbia during this period was Kraljevina Srbija. Kőnigsreich Serbien is the German name.
Which treaty formally established the Kingdom of Serbia under Habsburg dominion in 1718?
Answer: Treaty of Passarowitz
The Treaty of Passarowitz, signed in 1718, formalized the establishment of the Kingdom of Serbia under Habsburg rule and delineated the territorial changes resulting from the war.
Which war concluded with the Treaty of Belgrade in 1739, resulting in the cessation of Habsburg rule over Serbia?
Answer: The Austro-Turkish War of 1737-1739
The Austro-Turkish War of 1737-1739 concluded with the Treaty of Belgrade in 1739, leading to the end of Habsburg rule in Serbia.
What was the German designation for the Kingdom of Serbia during the period 1718-1739?
Answer: Kőnigsreich Serbien
The German name for the Kingdom of Serbia during this period was Kőnigsreich Serbien.
The Treaty of Passarowitz, concluded in 1718, signified the termination of Habsburg rule over Serbia.
Answer: False, it marked the beginning of Habsburg rule.
The Treaty of Passarowitz in 1718 marked the beginning, not the end, of Habsburg rule over Serbia. The end occurred in 1739 with the Treaty of Belgrade.
What was the Latin designation for the Kingdom of Serbia during the Habsburg period?
Answer: Regnum Serviae
The Latin name for the Kingdom of Serbia during the Habsburg period was Regnum Serviae.