Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


LexisNexis: A Comprehensive Overview of its History, Services, and Impact

At a Glance

Title: LexisNexis: A Comprehensive Overview of its History, Services, and Impact

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Foundations and Early Development (1950s-1970s): 15 flashcards, 28 questions
  • Growth, Acquisitions, and Market Expansion (1980s-1990s): 8 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Corporate Structure and Modern Services (2000s-Present): 13 flashcards, 23 questions
  • Data Privacy, Legal Issues, and Regulatory Landscape: 10 flashcards, 17 questions
  • Operational Details and Industry Recognition: 4 flashcards, 7 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 50
  • True/False Questions: 50
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 38
  • Total Questions: 88

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about LexisNexis: A Comprehensive Overview of its History, Services, and Impact

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "LexisNexis" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: LexisNexis: A Comprehensive Overview of its History, Services, and Impact

Study Guide: LexisNexis: A Comprehensive Overview of its History, Services, and Impact

Foundations and Early Development (1950s-1970s)

LexisNexis holds historical significance as the first company to provide end-users direct access to computer databases, thereby eliminating the need for intermediaries such as librarians.

Answer: True

LexisNexis is recognized for pioneering direct end-user access to extensive computer databases, fundamentally changing how information, particularly legal information, was accessed and researched.

Related Concepts:

  • What was LexisNexis's historical significance in the information services industry?: LexisNexis is historically significant because it was the first major information service to enable large numbers of end users to directly interact with computer databases, bypassing traditional intermediaries like librarians. This marked a shift towards more direct access to information.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What was the size of LexisNexis's electronic database for legal and public-records information as of 2006?: As of 2006, LexisNexis possessed the world's largest electronic database for legal and public-records-related information. This vast collection underscored its leading position in the industry.

LexisNexis commenced making legal and journalistic documents electronically accessible during the late 1980s.

Answer: False

The electronic accessibility of legal and journalistic documents by LexisNexis began in the 1970s, predating the late 1980s timeframe mentioned.

Related Concepts:

  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What was LexisNexis's historical significance in the information services industry?: LexisNexis is historically significant because it was the first major information service to enable large numbers of end users to directly interact with computer databases, bypassing traditional intermediaries like librarians. This marked a shift towards more direct access to information.
  • What significant milestones occurred in 1980 for LexisNexis?: In 1980, LEXIS completed its hand-keyed electronic database of all existing U.S. federal and state cases. Additionally, the NEXIS service was launched that same year, providing journalists with a searchable database of news articles.

John Horty, an attorney, pioneered computer-assisted legal research (CALR) by initiating exploration into its application for comparative hospital law as early as 1956.

Answer: True

John Horty is recognized for his foundational work in computer-assisted legal research, beginning his investigations into CALR for hospital law in 1956.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was John Horty and what was his contribution to computer-assisted legal research (CALR)?: John Horty was an attorney who began exploring the use of CALR technology in 1956 to support his work on comparative hospital law. His efforts laid groundwork for systems like LexisNexis by demonstrating the potential of using computers to manage and search legal information.

The Ohio State Bar Association's (OSBA) computer-assisted legal research (CALR) system, designated OBAR, commenced development in 1965, drawing inspiration from John Horty's prior work.

Answer: True

The OBAR system, developed by the Ohio State Bar Association starting in 1965, was indeed influenced by the pioneering efforts of John Horty in the field of CALR.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Ohio State Bar Association's (OSBA) CALR system called, and when did they start developing it?: The OSBA's CALR system was called Ohio Bar Automated Research (OBAR), and its development began in 1965. This project was inspired by John Horty's earlier work.
  • Who was John Horty and what was his contribution to computer-assisted legal research (CALR)?: John Horty was an attorney who began exploring the use of CALR technology in 1956 to support his work on comparative hospital law. His efforts laid groundwork for systems like LexisNexis by demonstrating the potential of using computers to manage and search legal information.

The OSBA contracted with IBM in 1967 to construct the OBAR system.

Answer: False

The OSBA contracted with Data Corporation, not IBM, in 1967 to build the OBAR system.

Related Concepts:

  • Which company did the OSBA contract with to build the OBAR system?: The OSBA contracted with Data Corporation, a local defense contractor, in 1967 to build the OBAR system based on the OSBA's specifications. Data Corporation was known for its technological capabilities.
  • What was the Ohio State Bar Association's (OSBA) CALR system called, and when did they start developing it?: The OSBA's CALR system was called Ohio Bar Automated Research (OBAR), and its development began in 1965. This project was inspired by John Horty's earlier work.

Mead Corporation acquired Data Corporation in 1968 primarily to leverage its advanced inkjet printing technology.

Answer: True

Mead Corporation's acquisition of Data Corporation in 1968 was motivated by Data Corporation's sophisticated inkjet printing technology, marking Mead's entry into the information services sector.

Related Concepts:

  • Which company purchased Data Corporation in 1968, and why?: Mead Corporation purchased Data Corporation in 1968 for $6 million, primarily to gain control of its inkjet printing technology. This acquisition marked Mead's entry into the information services sector.

An Arthur D. Little study concluded that the market potential for Data Central technology was significant in both legal and nonlegal sectors, recommending expansion into both.

Answer: False

The Arthur D. Little study indicated that while the legal market showed potential for Data Central technology, the nonlegal market was deemed nonexistent. It recommended rebuilding the OBAR system for the legal market.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the Arthur D. Little study regarding the business possibilities for Data Central technology?: The Arthur D. Little study concluded that while the nonlegal market for Data Central technology was nonexistent, the legal market showed potential. It recommended rebuilding the OBAR system to profitably exploit this legal market.

The original OBAR system was criticized for its speed, with searches sometimes taking hours and utilizing slow Teletype terminals.

Answer: True

The initial OBAR system faced criticism due to its slow performance, where searches could extend for hours, and its reliance on slow Teletype terminals.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the performance issues with the original OBAR system?: The original OBAR system suffered from significant performance issues, with searches often taking up to five hours to complete when more than one user was online. Additionally, its initial terminals were slow Teletypes.
  • What was the Ohio State Bar Association's (OSBA) CALR system called, and when did they start developing it?: The OSBA's CALR system was called Ohio Bar Automated Research (OBAR), and its development began in 1965. This project was inspired by John Horty's earlier work.

Mead Data Central (MDC) was established in February 1970 as a new subsidiary of Mead Corporation, focusing on information services.

Answer: True

Mead Data Central (MDC) was formally established in February 1970, consolidating information services operations under a new Mead Corporation subsidiary.

Related Concepts:

  • In what year was Mead Data Central (MDC) formed, and what did it encompass?: Mead Data Central (MDC) was formed in February 1970 when Mead reorganized Data Corporation's Information Systems Division. It was established as a new Mead subsidiary focused on information services.
  • In what year did MDC first turn a profit?: Mead Data Central (MDC) turned a profit for the first time in 1977. This marked a key financial milestone after years of development and investment.
  • Which company purchased Data Corporation in 1968, and why?: Mead Corporation purchased Data Corporation in 1968 for $6 million, primarily to gain control of its inkjet printing technology. This acquisition marked Mead's entry into the information services sector.

The name LEXIS was derived from the Greek word 'lexis' meaning 'word' and 'IS' representing 'information system'.

Answer: False

According to the provided information, the name LEXIS was derived from 'lex,' the Latin word for law, combined with 'IS' for 'information service,' not from the Greek word 'lexis'.

Related Concepts:

  • What new name was coined for the information service dedicated to legal research, and what is its etymology?: The new name coined for the legal research service was LEXIS, derived from 'lex,' the Latin word for law, and 'IS,' standing for 'information service.' This name reflected its core purpose.

MDC initially struggled to gain traction with American lawyers, requiring minimal marketing efforts due to existing computer literacy.

Answer: False

MDC faced challenges in persuading American lawyers to adopt LEXIS, necessitating extensive marketing, sales, and training campaigns due to the low level of computer literacy prevalent among legal professionals at the time.

Related Concepts:

  • How did MDC persuade American lawyers to use LEXIS?: MDC employed aggressive marketing, sales, and training campaigns to persuade American lawyers to adopt LEXIS, aiming to place a terminal on every lawyer's desk. This was necessary due to the rarity of computer literacy at the time.

LEXIS was publicly launched on April 2, 1973, initially offering New York and Ohio case law along with federal tax materials.

Answer: True

The public debut of LEXIS occurred on April 2, 1973, with its initial offerings comprising case law from New York and Ohio, supplemented by federal tax materials.

Related Concepts:

  • On what date did MDC publicly launch LEXIS, and what legal materials were initially available?: MDC publicly launched LEXIS on April 2, 1973, at a press conference in New York City. Initially, it offered libraries of New York and Ohio case law, along with a separate library of federal tax materials.
  • What significant milestones occurred in 1980 for LexisNexis?: In 1980, LEXIS completed its hand-keyed electronic database of all existing U.S. federal and state cases. Additionally, the NEXIS service was launched that same year, providing journalists with a searchable database of news articles.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.

By 1974, LEXIS utilized an IBM 370/155 computer in Ohio with IBM 3330 disk storage capable of holding around 40 billion characters.

Answer: False

In 1974, LEXIS operated on an IBM 370/155 computer with IBM 3330 disk storage units that could hold approximately 4 billion characters, not 40 billion.

Related Concepts:

  • What hardware was LEXIS running on by 1974, and what was its storage capacity?: By 1974, LEXIS was operating on an IBM 370/155 computer in Ohio, supported by IBM 3330 disk storage units capable of storing approximately 4 billion characters. This infrastructure allowed for efficient data processing.
  • How quickly could LEXIS execute searches in 1974?: In 1974, LEXIS was able to execute over 90% of searches within fewer than five seconds, a significant improvement over earlier systems. This speed was crucial for user adoption.

In 1974, LEXIS could execute over 90% of searches in under five seconds, demonstrating significant speed improvements.

Answer: True

By 1974, LEXIS achieved a notable performance benchmark, executing more than 90% of searches in less than five seconds, indicating substantial advancements in search speed.

Related Concepts:

  • How quickly could LEXIS execute searches in 1974?: In 1974, LEXIS was able to execute over 90% of searches within fewer than five seconds, a significant improvement over earlier systems. This speed was crucial for user adoption.
  • What hardware was LEXIS running on by 1974, and what was its storage capacity?: By 1974, LEXIS was operating on an IBM 370/155 computer in Ohio, supported by IBM 3330 disk storage units capable of storing approximately 4 billion characters. This infrastructure allowed for efficient data processing.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.

What historical innovation is LexisNexis credited with in the information services industry?

Answer: Being the first major service allowing end-users direct access to computer databases.

LexisNexis is recognized for its pioneering role in enabling widespread, direct end-user access to extensive computer databases, a significant advancement in information retrieval.

Related Concepts:

  • What was LexisNexis's historical significance in the information services industry?: LexisNexis is historically significant because it was the first major information service to enable large numbers of end users to directly interact with computer databases, bypassing traditional intermediaries like librarians. This marked a shift towards more direct access to information.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What was the size of LexisNexis's electronic database for legal and public-records information as of 2006?: As of 2006, LexisNexis possessed the world's largest electronic database for legal and public-records-related information. This vast collection underscored its leading position in the industry.

During which decade did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically?

Answer: 1970s

The initiative to make legal and journalistic documents electronically accessible commenced during the 1970s, marking the early phase of LexisNexis's development.

Related Concepts:

  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What significant milestones occurred in 1980 for LexisNexis?: In 1980, LEXIS completed its hand-keyed electronic database of all existing U.S. federal and state cases. Additionally, the NEXIS service was launched that same year, providing journalists with a searchable database of news articles.
  • What was LexisNexis's historical significance in the information services industry?: LexisNexis is historically significant because it was the first major information service to enable large numbers of end users to directly interact with computer databases, bypassing traditional intermediaries like librarians. This marked a shift towards more direct access to information.

Who is credited with pioneering computer-assisted legal research (CALR) starting in 1956 with work on comparative hospital law?

Answer: John Horty

John Horty, an attorney, is recognized for his early pioneering work in computer-assisted legal research (CALR), beginning his explorations in 1956 with applications in comparative hospital law.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was John Horty and what was his contribution to computer-assisted legal research (CALR)?: John Horty was an attorney who began exploring the use of CALR technology in 1956 to support his work on comparative hospital law. His efforts laid groundwork for systems like LexisNexis by demonstrating the potential of using computers to manage and search legal information.

What was the name of the Ohio State Bar Association's (OSBA) CALR system developed starting in 1965?

Answer: OBAR (Ohio Bar Automated Research)

The computer-assisted legal research system developed by the Ohio State Bar Association, commencing in 1965, was named OBAR, an acronym for Ohio Bar Automated Research.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Ohio State Bar Association's (OSBA) CALR system called, and when did they start developing it?: The OSBA's CALR system was called Ohio Bar Automated Research (OBAR), and its development began in 1965. This project was inspired by John Horty's earlier work.

Which company did the OSBA initially contract with in 1967 to build the OBAR system?

Answer: Data Corporation

In 1967, the Ohio State Bar Association (OSBA) entered into a contract with Data Corporation, a local defense contractor, for the development of the OBAR system.

Related Concepts:

  • Which company did the OSBA contract with to build the OBAR system?: The OSBA contracted with Data Corporation, a local defense contractor, in 1967 to build the OBAR system based on the OSBA's specifications. Data Corporation was known for its technological capabilities.
  • What was the Ohio State Bar Association's (OSBA) CALR system called, and when did they start developing it?: The OSBA's CALR system was called Ohio Bar Automated Research (OBAR), and its development began in 1965. This project was inspired by John Horty's earlier work.

Why did Mead Corporation purchase Data Corporation in 1968?

Answer: To acquire its inkjet printing technology.

Mead Corporation acquired Data Corporation in 1968 primarily to obtain its advanced inkjet printing technology, which represented a strategic move into the information services sector.

Related Concepts:

  • Which company purchased Data Corporation in 1968, and why?: Mead Corporation purchased Data Corporation in 1968 for $6 million, primarily to gain control of its inkjet printing technology. This acquisition marked Mead's entry into the information services sector.
  • In what year was Mead Data Central (MDC) formed, and what did it encompass?: Mead Data Central (MDC) was formed in February 1970 when Mead reorganized Data Corporation's Information Systems Division. It was established as a new Mead subsidiary focused on information services.

What did the Arthur D. Little study conclude about the market potential for Data Central technology?

Answer: The legal market showed potential, but the nonlegal market was nonexistent.

The Arthur D. Little study determined that Data Central technology possessed significant potential within the legal market but lacked viability in the nonlegal sector.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the Arthur D. Little study regarding the business possibilities for Data Central technology?: The Arthur D. Little study concluded that while the nonlegal market for Data Central technology was nonexistent, the legal market showed potential. It recommended rebuilding the OBAR system to profitably exploit this legal market.

Which of the following was a significant performance issue with the original OBAR system?

Answer: Searches frequently took over five hours to complete.

A major performance drawback of the original OBAR system was the excessive time required for searches, which could sometimes take upwards of five hours, particularly when multiple users were online.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the performance issues with the original OBAR system?: The original OBAR system suffered from significant performance issues, with searches often taking up to five hours to complete when more than one user was online. Additionally, its initial terminals were slow Teletypes.

When was Mead Data Central (MDC) officially formed as a new subsidiary of Mead Corporation?

Answer: 1970

Mead Data Central (MDC) was formally established in February 1970, operating as a newly created subsidiary of the Mead Corporation focused on information services.

Related Concepts:

  • In what year was Mead Data Central (MDC) formed, and what did it encompass?: Mead Data Central (MDC) was formed in February 1970 when Mead reorganized Data Corporation's Information Systems Division. It was established as a new Mead subsidiary focused on information services.
  • In what year did MDC first turn a profit?: Mead Data Central (MDC) turned a profit for the first time in 1977. This marked a key financial milestone after years of development and investment.
  • Which company purchased Data Corporation in 1968, and why?: Mead Corporation purchased Data Corporation in 1968 for $6 million, primarily to gain control of its inkjet printing technology. This acquisition marked Mead's entry into the information services sector.

How did MDC persuade American lawyers to use LEXIS?

Answer: Through aggressive marketing, sales, and training campaigns.

MDC employed robust marketing, sales, and training initiatives to encourage adoption of LEXIS among American lawyers, addressing the prevalent lack of computer literacy at the time.

Related Concepts:

  • How did MDC persuade American lawyers to use LEXIS?: MDC employed aggressive marketing, sales, and training campaigns to persuade American lawyers to adopt LEXIS, aiming to place a terminal on every lawyer's desk. This was necessary due to the rarity of computer literacy at the time.

What initial legal materials were available when LEXIS publicly launched on April 2, 1973?

Answer: New York and Ohio case law, plus federal tax materials.

Upon its public launch on April 2, 1973, LEXIS provided access to case law from New York and Ohio, alongside a distinct library of federal tax materials.

Related Concepts:

  • On what date did MDC publicly launch LEXIS, and what legal materials were initially available?: MDC publicly launched LEXIS on April 2, 1973, at a press conference in New York City. Initially, it offered libraries of New York and Ohio case law, along with a separate library of federal tax materials.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What significant milestones occurred in 1980 for LexisNexis?: In 1980, LEXIS completed its hand-keyed electronic database of all existing U.S. federal and state cases. Additionally, the NEXIS service was launched that same year, providing journalists with a searchable database of news articles.

By 1974, what was the approximate storage capacity of the IBM disk units used by LEXIS?

Answer: 4 billion characters

In 1974, the IBM 3330 disk storage units employed by LEXIS had the capacity to store approximately 4 billion characters.

Related Concepts:

  • What hardware was LEXIS running on by 1974, and what was its storage capacity?: By 1974, LEXIS was operating on an IBM 370/155 computer in Ohio, supported by IBM 3330 disk storage units capable of storing approximately 4 billion characters. This infrastructure allowed for efficient data processing.
  • How quickly could LEXIS execute searches in 1974?: In 1974, LEXIS was able to execute over 90% of searches within fewer than five seconds, a significant improvement over earlier systems. This speed was crucial for user adoption.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.

How fast were searches typically executed on LEXIS in 1974?

Answer: Fewer than 5 seconds

By 1974, LEXIS demonstrated significant speed improvements, executing over 90% of searches in under five seconds.

Related Concepts:

  • How quickly could LEXIS execute searches in 1974?: In 1974, LEXIS was able to execute over 90% of searches within fewer than five seconds, a significant improvement over earlier systems. This speed was crucial for user adoption.
  • What hardware was LEXIS running on by 1974, and what was its storage capacity?: By 1974, LEXIS was operating on an IBM 370/155 computer in Ohio, supported by IBM 3330 disk storage units capable of storing approximately 4 billion characters. This infrastructure allowed for efficient data processing.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.

In which year did Mead Data Central (MDC) first report a profit?

Answer: 1977

Mead Data Central (MDC) achieved profitability for the first time in 1977, marking a key financial milestone in its operational history.

Related Concepts:

  • In what year did MDC first turn a profit?: Mead Data Central (MDC) turned a profit for the first time in 1977. This marked a key financial milestone after years of development and investment.
  • In what year was Mead Data Central (MDC) formed, and what did it encompass?: Mead Data Central (MDC) was formed in February 1970 when Mead reorganized Data Corporation's Information Systems Division. It was established as a new Mead subsidiary focused on information services.
  • Which company purchased Data Corporation in 1968, and why?: Mead Corporation purchased Data Corporation in 1968 for $6 million, primarily to gain control of its inkjet printing technology. This acquisition marked Mead's entry into the information services sector.

Growth, Acquisitions, and Market Expansion (1980s-1990s)

In 1980, LEXIS completed its electronic database of all U.S. federal and state cases, and the NEXIS service was launched.

Answer: True

The year 1980 was pivotal, with LEXIS finalizing its comprehensive electronic database of U.S. federal and state cases and simultaneously launching the NEXIS service for news content.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant milestones occurred in 1980 for LexisNexis?: In 1980, LEXIS completed its hand-keyed electronic database of all existing U.S. federal and state cases. Additionally, the NEXIS service was launched that same year, providing journalists with a searchable database of news articles.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What was LexisNexis's historical significance in the information services industry?: LexisNexis is historically significant because it was the first major information service to enable large numbers of end users to directly interact with computer databases, bypassing traditional intermediaries like librarians. This marked a shift towards more direct access to information.

Mead Data Central sued Toyota over the 'Lexus' brand name, claiming potential confusion with 'Lexis' among consumers of legal services.

Answer: True

Mead Data Central initiated a lawsuit against Toyota concerning the 'Lexus' trademark, asserting that the similarity could lead to confusion among consumers, particularly those interacting with legal services.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the basis of Mead Data Central's trademark infringement lawsuit against Toyota regarding the Lexus brand?: Mead Data Central sued Toyota for trademark infringement, arguing that consumers of upscale products might confuse the name 'Lexus' with 'Lexis.' The lawsuit centered on the potential for brand confusion in the marketplace.
  • What was the outcome of the trademark infringement case against Toyota on appeal in 1989?: On appeal in 1989, the Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled against Mead Data Central, holding that there was little chance of consumer confusion between 'Lexus' and 'Lexis.' This decision allowed Toyota to continue using the Lexus brand name.

Mead acquired the prominent legal publisher Michie Company in 1988.

Answer: True

In 1988, Mead Corporation expanded its legal resources portfolio through the acquisition of the well-regarded legal publisher, the Michie Company.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Mead acquire the Michie Company?: Mead acquired the Michie Company, a legal publisher, in 1988. This acquisition expanded Mead's portfolio of legal resources.
  • For how much did Mead sell the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier in 1994?: Mead sold the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier in December 1994 for $1.5 billion. This transaction represented a significant valuation for the company's assets.

Reed Elsevier purchased the LexisNexis system from Mead Corporation in December 1994 for $1.5 million.

Answer: False

Reed Elsevier acquired the LexisNexis system from Mead Corporation in December 1994, but the transaction value was $1.5 billion, not $1.5 million.

Related Concepts:

  • For how much did Mead sell the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier in 1994?: Mead sold the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier in December 1994 for $1.5 billion. This transaction represented a significant valuation for the company's assets.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.
  • When did Reed Elsevier acquire Shepard's Citations and integrate it into LexisNexis?: Reed Elsevier acquired Shepard's Citations in 1998 and made it a part of LexisNexis. Shepard's was a crucial tool for legal citation verification before electronic alternatives became widespread.

In 1997, LexisNexis acquired 52 legal titles, including the Lawyers' Edition, from Thomson Corporation as part of regulatory conditions.

Answer: True

As a consequence of regulatory requirements related to Thomson Corporation's acquisition of West Publishing, LexisNexis acquired 52 legal titles, notably the Lawyers' Edition, in 1997.

Related Concepts:

  • What legal titles did LexisNexis acquire from Thomson Corporation in 1997?: In 1997, LexisNexis acquired 52 legal titles, including the Lawyers' Edition, from the Thomson Corporation. This acquisition was a condition set by regulators for Thomson's purchase of West Publishing.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.

Shepard's Citations was acquired by Reed Elsevier and integrated into LexisNexis in 1998.

Answer: True

The integration of Shepard's Citations into LexisNexis occurred in 1998, following its acquisition by Reed Elsevier.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Reed Elsevier acquire Shepard's Citations and integrate it into LexisNexis?: Reed Elsevier acquired Shepard's Citations in 1998 and made it a part of LexisNexis. Shepard's was a crucial tool for legal citation verification before electronic alternatives became widespread.
  • What is the significance of Shepard's Citations in legal research?: Before the emergence of electronic citators like Westlaw's KeyCite, Shepard's Citations was the primary and only legal citation service that aimed to provide comprehensive coverage of American law. It was essential for verifying the validity and status of legal citations.

In the 1989 appeal regarding the 'Lexus' trademark, the court ruled in favor of Mead Data Central, preventing Toyota from using the name.

Answer: False

On appeal in 1989, the court ruled against Mead Data Central, finding insufficient likelihood of consumer confusion between 'Lexus' and 'Lexis,' thus allowing Toyota to retain the brand name.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the trademark infringement case against Toyota on appeal in 1989?: On appeal in 1989, the Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled against Mead Data Central, holding that there was little chance of consumer confusion between 'Lexus' and 'Lexis.' This decision allowed Toyota to continue using the Lexus brand name.
  • What was the basis of Mead Data Central's trademark infringement lawsuit against Toyota regarding the Lexus brand?: Mead Data Central sued Toyota for trademark infringement, arguing that consumers of upscale products might confuse the name 'Lexus' with 'Lexis.' The lawsuit centered on the potential for brand confusion in the marketplace.

Shepard's Citations was historically significant as the primary legal citation service before the widespread adoption of electronic citators.

Answer: True

Prior to the prevalence of electronic citators, Shepard's Citations served as the principal legal citation service, essential for verifying the status and validity of legal references.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of Shepard's Citations in legal research?: Before the emergence of electronic citators like Westlaw's KeyCite, Shepard's Citations was the primary and only legal citation service that aimed to provide comprehensive coverage of American law. It was essential for verifying the validity and status of legal citations.
  • When did Reed Elsevier acquire Shepard's Citations and integrate it into LexisNexis?: Reed Elsevier acquired Shepard's Citations in 1998 and made it a part of LexisNexis. Shepard's was a crucial tool for legal citation verification before electronic alternatives became widespread.

Which two major developments occurred for LexisNexis in 1980?

Answer: Completion of federal/state case database and launch of NEXIS.

The year 1980 saw two significant advancements for LexisNexis: the completion of its comprehensive electronic database of U.S. federal and state cases, and the introduction of the NEXIS service.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant milestones occurred in 1980 for LexisNexis?: In 1980, LEXIS completed its hand-keyed electronic database of all existing U.S. federal and state cases. Additionally, the NEXIS service was launched that same year, providing journalists with a searchable database of news articles.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What was LexisNexis's historical significance in the information services industry?: LexisNexis is historically significant because it was the first major information service to enable large numbers of end users to directly interact with computer databases, bypassing traditional intermediaries like librarians. This marked a shift towards more direct access to information.

What was the outcome of the trademark infringement lawsuit Mead Data Central filed against Toyota regarding the 'Lexus' brand name, specifically on appeal in 1989?

Answer: The appeals court ruled against Mead Data Central, finding little chance of consumer confusion.

On appeal in 1989, the court determined that there was minimal likelihood of consumer confusion between the 'Lexus' and 'Lexis' names, ruling against Mead Data Central's claim.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the trademark infringement case against Toyota on appeal in 1989?: On appeal in 1989, the Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled against Mead Data Central, holding that there was little chance of consumer confusion between 'Lexus' and 'Lexis.' This decision allowed Toyota to continue using the Lexus brand name.
  • What was the basis of Mead Data Central's trademark infringement lawsuit against Toyota regarding the Lexus brand?: Mead Data Central sued Toyota for trademark infringement, arguing that consumers of upscale products might confuse the name 'Lexus' with 'Lexis.' The lawsuit centered on the potential for brand confusion in the marketplace.

In 1994, Mead sold the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier for how much money?

Answer: $1.5 billion

In December 1994, Mead Corporation divested the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier for a sum of $1.5 billion.

Related Concepts:

  • For how much did Mead sell the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier in 1994?: Mead sold the LexisNexis system to Reed Elsevier in December 1994 for $1.5 billion. This transaction represented a significant valuation for the company's assets.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.

Which crucial legal citation verification tool was acquired by Reed Elsevier and integrated into LexisNexis in 1998?

Answer: Shepard's Citations

Shepard's Citations, a vital tool for verifying legal citations, was acquired by Reed Elsevier in 1998 and subsequently integrated into the LexisNexis platform.

Related Concepts:

  • When did Reed Elsevier acquire Shepard's Citations and integrate it into LexisNexis?: Reed Elsevier acquired Shepard's Citations in 1998 and made it a part of LexisNexis. Shepard's was a crucial tool for legal citation verification before electronic alternatives became widespread.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.
  • What is the significance of Shepard's Citations in legal research?: Before the emergence of electronic citators like Westlaw's KeyCite, Shepard's Citations was the primary and only legal citation service that aimed to provide comprehensive coverage of American law. It was essential for verifying the validity and status of legal citations.

Before electronic citators became common, what was the role of Shepard's Citations?

Answer: It served as the main legal citation service for verifying the status of American law.

Shepard's Citations functioned as the principal legal citation service, crucial for verifying the validity and current status of American legal authorities before the widespread adoption of electronic citators.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of Shepard's Citations in legal research?: Before the emergence of electronic citators like Westlaw's KeyCite, Shepard's Citations was the primary and only legal citation service that aimed to provide comprehensive coverage of American law. It was essential for verifying the validity and status of legal citations.
  • When did Reed Elsevier acquire Shepard's Citations and integrate it into LexisNexis?: Reed Elsevier acquired Shepard's Citations in 1998 and made it a part of LexisNexis. Shepard's was a crucial tool for legal citation verification before electronic alternatives became widespread.

Corporate Structure and Modern Services (2000s-Present)

The primary products offered by LexisNexis are limited exclusively to databases for legal research and news searches.

Answer: False

While legal research and news searches are core offerings, LexisNexis provides a broader range of products and services, including consumer information, market intelligence, and tools for various professional sectors.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary types of products offered by LexisNexis?: LexisNexis offers a range of products including databases for computer-assisted legal research (CALR), newspaper searches, consumer information, case law, articles, publications, news, court documents, lawyer marketing tools, law practice management tools, media monitoring tools, supply management tools, sales intelligence solutions, and market intelligence tools.
  • How are LexisNexis services primarily delivered?: LexisNexis services are primarily delivered through two websites that require separate paid subscriptions. This model provides access to its extensive databases and research tools.
  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.

LexisNexis operates as a subsidiary of RELX, a global information and analytics services provider formerly known as Reed Elsevier.

Answer: True

LexisNexis is indeed a subsidiary of RELX, a multinational information and analytics conglomerate that was previously known as Reed Elsevier.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.
  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.
  • How are LexisNexis services primarily delivered?: LexisNexis services are primarily delivered through two websites that require separate paid subscriptions. This model provides access to its extensive databases and research tools.

As of 2006, LexisNexis housed the largest electronic database globally for legal and public-records information.

Answer: True

By 2006, LexisNexis had amassed the world's most extensive electronic database encompassing legal and public-records information, reflecting its dominant market position.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the size of LexisNexis's electronic database for legal and public-records information as of 2006?: As of 2006, LexisNexis possessed the world's largest electronic database for legal and public-records-related information. This vast collection underscored its leading position in the industry.
  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.
  • What was LexisNexis's historical significance in the information services industry?: LexisNexis is historically significant because it was the first major information service to enable large numbers of end users to directly interact with computer databases, bypassing traditional intermediaries like librarians. This marked a shift towards more direct access to information.

Mead Data Central (MDC) achieved profitability for the first time in 1977.

Answer: True

The year 1977 marked a significant financial milestone for Mead Data Central (MDC) as it reported profitability for the first time.

Related Concepts:

  • In what year did MDC first turn a profit?: Mead Data Central (MDC) turned a profit for the first time in 1977. This marked a key financial milestone after years of development and investment.
  • In what year was Mead Data Central (MDC) formed, and what did it encompass?: Mead Data Central (MDC) was formed in February 1970 when Mead reorganized Data Corporation's Information Systems Division. It was established as a new Mead subsidiary focused on information services.
  • Which company purchased Data Corporation in 1968, and why?: Mead Corporation purchased Data Corporation in 1968 for $6 million, primarily to gain control of its inkjet printing technology. This acquisition marked Mead's entry into the information services sector.

LexisNexis completed its transition to Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud architecture in February 2020, decommissioning its legacy mainframes.

Answer: True

In February 2020, LexisNexis finalized its migration to Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud infrastructure, marking the retirement of its traditional mainframe systems.

Related Concepts:

  • When did LexisNexis transition its database services to Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud architecture?: LexisNexis transitioned its database services to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud architecture in February 2020, shutting down its legacy mainframes and servers. This move represented a significant technological modernization.

LexisNexis services are primarily accessed via a single, free public website.

Answer: False

LexisNexis services are typically accessed through multiple websites that necessitate separate paid subscriptions, rather than a single, free public portal.

Related Concepts:

  • How are LexisNexis services primarily delivered?: LexisNexis services are primarily delivered through two websites that require separate paid subscriptions. This model provides access to its extensive databases and research tools.
  • What is the official website for LexisNexis?: The official website address for LexisNexis is www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page. This portal serves as the primary online presence for the company's services and information.
  • What are the primary types of products offered by LexisNexis?: LexisNexis offers a range of products including databases for computer-assisted legal research (CALR), newspaper searches, consumer information, case law, articles, publications, news, court documents, lawyer marketing tools, law practice management tools, media monitoring tools, supply management tools, sales intelligence solutions, and market intelligence tools.

LexisNexis Precision is a generative AI tool designed to assist attorneys with tasks like summarizing case developments and drafting legal documents.

Answer: True

LexisNexis Precision functions as a generative artificial intelligence tool intended to support attorneys by summarizing case developments and aiding in the drafting of legal documents.

Related Concepts:

  • What is LexisNexis Precision?: LexisNexis Precision is a generative AI tool designed for attorneys. It can produce memos defining key legal concepts, summarize new case developments, and generate common legal documents, aiming to enhance legal practice efficiency.
  • What was the purpose of the LexisNexis Precision tool?: LexisNexis Precision is designed to assist attorneys by using generative AI to produce memos defining key legal concepts, summarize new case developments, and generate common legal documents. Its goal is to streamline legal writing and research processes.

The organization that evolved into LexisNexis UK was founded in the 20th century by a collective of London barristers.

Answer: False

The organization that evolved into LexisNexis UK was founded much earlier, in 1818, by Henry Butterworth, not in the 20th century by barristers.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the organization that eventually became LexisNexis UK founded, and by whom?: The organization that eventually became LexisNexis UK was founded in 1818 by Henry Butterworth. Butterworth was a law bookseller who established his business on Fleet Street.

Butterworths, a UK legal publishing business, is currently owned by Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd.

Answer: True

The Butterworths legal publishing business in the United Kingdom is presently under the ownership of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd, a component of the broader Reed Elsevier Group.

Related Concepts:

  • Which company currently owns and operates the Butterworths publishing business in the UK?: The Butterworths publishing business in the UK is currently owned and operated by Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd, which is part of the Reed Elsevier Group. This entity continues to publish under various trade marks.
  • When was the organization that eventually became LexisNexis UK founded, and by whom?: The organization that eventually became LexisNexis UK was founded in 1818 by Henry Butterworth. Butterworth was a law bookseller who established his business on Fleet Street.

LexisNexis UK offers services such as case management systems and CRM tools to streamline legal workflows.

Answer: True

LexisNexis UK provides a suite of services, including case management systems and customer relationship management (CRM) tools, designed to enhance the efficiency of legal practice workflows.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of software and services does LexisNexis UK produce to support the legal profession?: LexisNexis UK produces a range of software and services designed to support legal practice, including case management systems, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, and proofreading tools for Microsoft Office. These tools aim to streamline legal workflows.
  • What are the primary types of products offered by LexisNexis?: LexisNexis offers a range of products including databases for computer-assisted legal research (CALR), newspaper searches, consumer information, case law, articles, publications, news, court documents, lawyer marketing tools, law practice management tools, media monitoring tools, supply management tools, sales intelligence solutions, and market intelligence tools.
  • How are LexisNexis services primarily delivered?: LexisNexis services are primarily delivered through two websites that require separate paid subscriptions. This model provides access to its extensive databases and research tools.

InterAction is a customer relationship management (CRM) system specifically designed for accountancy and legal firms.

Answer: True

InterAction is indeed a CRM system tailored for professional services firms, including those in the accountancy and legal sectors, to manage client relationships and business development.

Related Concepts:

  • What is InterAction, and for which types of firms is it designed?: InterAction is a customer relationship management (CRM) system specifically designed for professional services firms, such as accountancy and legal firms. It helps manage client relationships and business development activities.

Seisint, Inc. operated the MATRIX system, a data aggregation service acquired by Reed Elsevier Group in 2004.

Answer: True

Seisint, Inc., which operated the MATRIX data aggregation service, was acquired by Reed Elsevier Group in 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Seisint, Inc. house and operate?: Seisint, Inc. housed and operated the Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (MATRIX). This data aggregation service was acquired by Reed Elsevier Group in 2004.

LexisNexis acquired BehavioSec, a behavioral biometrics technology provider, in May 2022 to bolster fraud prevention capabilities.

Answer: True

In May 2022, LexisNexis enhanced its fraud prevention measures through the acquisition of BehavioSec, a company specializing in behavioral biometrics technology.

Related Concepts:

  • What did LexisNexis acquire in May 2022?: In May 2022, LexisNexis acquired BehavioSec, a provider of behavioral biometrics technology. This acquisition aimed to enhance the company's offerings in areas like fraud prevention.

The LexisNexis Precision tool utilizes traditional legal databases to help attorneys summarize case law.

Answer: False

LexisNexis Precision is a generative AI tool designed to assist attorneys with tasks such as summarizing case developments and drafting legal documents, rather than solely relying on traditional legal databases.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose of the LexisNexis Precision tool?: LexisNexis Precision is designed to assist attorneys by using generative AI to produce memos defining key legal concepts, summarize new case developments, and generate common legal documents. Its goal is to streamline legal writing and research processes.
  • What is LexisNexis Precision?: LexisNexis Precision is a generative AI tool designed for attorneys. It can produce memos defining key legal concepts, summarize new case developments, and generate common legal documents, aiming to enhance legal practice efficiency.
  • What are the primary types of products offered by LexisNexis?: LexisNexis offers a range of products including databases for computer-assisted legal research (CALR), newspaper searches, consumer information, case law, articles, publications, news, court documents, lawyer marketing tools, law practice management tools, media monitoring tools, supply management tools, sales intelligence solutions, and market intelligence tools.

Which of the following is NOT listed as a product or service offered by LexisNexis?

Answer: Automotive manufacturing equipment

LexisNexis offers a wide array of services including legal research databases, market intelligence, and news/media monitoring tools, but automotive manufacturing equipment is outside its scope of offerings.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary types of products offered by LexisNexis?: LexisNexis offers a range of products including databases for computer-assisted legal research (CALR), newspaper searches, consumer information, case law, articles, publications, news, court documents, lawyer marketing tools, law practice management tools, media monitoring tools, supply management tools, sales intelligence solutions, and market intelligence tools.
  • How are LexisNexis services primarily delivered?: LexisNexis services are primarily delivered through two websites that require separate paid subscriptions. This model provides access to its extensive databases and research tools.
  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.

LexisNexis is a subsidiary of which global information and analytics provider?

Answer: RELX (formerly Reed Elsevier)

LexisNexis operates as a subsidiary under the umbrella of RELX, a global entity formerly known as Reed Elsevier, which specializes in information and analytics services.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.
  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.
  • What was the size of LexisNexis's electronic database for legal and public-records information as of 2006?: As of 2006, LexisNexis possessed the world's largest electronic database for legal and public-records-related information. This vast collection underscored its leading position in the industry.

What was the extent of LexisNexis's electronic database for legal and public-records information as of 2006?

Answer: It was the world's largest electronic database of its kind.

By 2006, LexisNexis possessed the world's most extensive electronic database dedicated to legal and public-records information, underscoring its leading position in the industry.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the size of LexisNexis's electronic database for legal and public-records information as of 2006?: As of 2006, LexisNexis possessed the world's largest electronic database for legal and public-records-related information. This vast collection underscored its leading position in the industry.
  • What significant milestones occurred in 1980 for LexisNexis?: In 1980, LEXIS completed its hand-keyed electronic database of all existing U.S. federal and state cases. Additionally, the NEXIS service was launched that same year, providing journalists with a searchable database of news articles.
  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.

What major technological shift did LexisNexis undertake in February 2020?

Answer: Transitioned database services to Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud.

In February 2020, LexisNexis completed a significant technological transition by migrating its database services to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud infrastructure.

Related Concepts:

  • When did LexisNexis transition its database services to Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud architecture?: LexisNexis transitioned its database services to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud architecture in February 2020, shutting down its legacy mainframes and servers. This move represented a significant technological modernization.
  • When did LexisNexis begin making legal and journalistic documents accessible electronically?: LexisNexis began making legal and journalistic documents more accessible electronically during the 1970s. This initiative was a key part of its early development.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.

How are LexisNexis services typically accessed by users?

Answer: Via multiple websites requiring separate paid subscriptions.

Access to LexisNexis services is generally provided through distinct websites, each necessitating a separate paid subscription for utilization.

Related Concepts:

  • How are LexisNexis services primarily delivered?: LexisNexis services are primarily delivered through two websites that require separate paid subscriptions. This model provides access to its extensive databases and research tools.
  • What are the primary types of products offered by LexisNexis?: LexisNexis offers a range of products including databases for computer-assisted legal research (CALR), newspaper searches, consumer information, case law, articles, publications, news, court documents, lawyer marketing tools, law practice management tools, media monitoring tools, supply management tools, sales intelligence solutions, and market intelligence tools.
  • What is the official website for LexisNexis?: The official website address for LexisNexis is www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page. This portal serves as the primary online presence for the company's services and information.

What is the primary function of LexisNexis Precision?

Answer: Providing generative AI assistance for legal tasks like drafting and summarization.

LexisNexis Precision serves as a generative AI tool designed to assist legal professionals with tasks such as summarizing case law developments and generating legal documents.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose of the LexisNexis Precision tool?: LexisNexis Precision is designed to assist attorneys by using generative AI to produce memos defining key legal concepts, summarize new case developments, and generate common legal documents. Its goal is to streamline legal writing and research processes.
  • What is LexisNexis Precision?: LexisNexis Precision is a generative AI tool designed for attorneys. It can produce memos defining key legal concepts, summarize new case developments, and generate common legal documents, aiming to enhance legal practice efficiency.
  • What are the primary types of products offered by LexisNexis?: LexisNexis offers a range of products including databases for computer-assisted legal research (CALR), newspaper searches, consumer information, case law, articles, publications, news, court documents, lawyer marketing tools, law practice management tools, media monitoring tools, supply management tools, sales intelligence solutions, and market intelligence tools.

The organization that evolved into LexisNexis UK was founded in 1818 by whom?

Answer: Henry Butterworth

The entity that eventually became LexisNexis UK traces its origins to 1818, founded by Henry Butterworth, a law bookseller.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the organization that eventually became LexisNexis UK founded, and by whom?: The organization that eventually became LexisNexis UK was founded in 1818 by Henry Butterworth. Butterworth was a law bookseller who established his business on Fleet Street.

What was the primary purpose of Seisint, Inc. and its MATRIX service?

Answer: To aggregate data for anti-terrorism and other purposes.

Seisint, Inc., through its MATRIX service, focused on aggregating data for purposes including anti-terrorism efforts and other data analysis applications.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Seisint, Inc. house and operate?: Seisint, Inc. housed and operated the Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (MATRIX). This data aggregation service was acquired by Reed Elsevier Group in 2004.

In May 2022, LexisNexis acquired BehavioSec to enhance its capabilities in which area?

Answer: Fraud prevention using behavioral biometrics

The acquisition of BehavioSec by LexisNexis in May 2022 was aimed at strengthening its capabilities in fraud prevention, particularly through the application of behavioral biometrics technology.

Related Concepts:

  • What did LexisNexis acquire in May 2022?: In May 2022, LexisNexis acquired BehavioSec, a provider of behavioral biometrics technology. This acquisition aimed to enhance the company's offerings in areas like fraud prevention.

Data Privacy, Legal Issues, and Regulatory Landscape

The 2005 data breach involving LexisNexis's Seisint division initially affected approximately 310,000 users, later revised down.

Answer: False

The initial estimate for the 2005 Seisint data breach was significantly lower, with the number of affected users later revised upwards to over 310,000 individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the initial estimate of users affected by the 2005 data breach, and what was the final number?: Initially, it was estimated that 32,000 users were affected by the 2005 data breach involving LexisNexis's Seisint division. However, this number later increased significantly to over 310,000 individuals.
  • What types of personal information were stolen during the 2005 LexisNexis data breach?: During the 2005 data breach, hackers stole passwords, names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and driver's license numbers of customers of LexisNexis's Seisint division. This sensitive data was compromised from the company's data aggregation services.

Sensitive personal information, including Social Security numbers and driver's license details, was compromised in the 2005 LexisNexis data breach.

Answer: True

The 2005 data breach associated with LexisNexis's Seisint division resulted in the compromise of highly sensitive personal data, such as Social Security numbers and driver's license information.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of personal information were stolen during the 2005 LexisNexis data breach?: During the 2005 data breach, hackers stole passwords, names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and driver's license numbers of customers of LexisNexis's Seisint division. This sensitive data was compromised from the company's data aggregation services.

In 2022, LexisNexis Risk Solutions faced a lawsuit accusing it of violating Illinois law by selling aggregated personal data to federal immigration authorities.

Answer: True

A lawsuit filed in 2022 alleged that LexisNexis Risk Solutions contravened Illinois state law by providing aggregated personal data to federal immigration authorities.

Related Concepts:

  • What was LexisNexis Risk Solutions accused of in a 2022 lawsuit filed by immigration advocates?: In a 2022 lawsuit, LexisNexis Risk Solutions was accused by immigration advocates of violating Illinois law by collecting and combining extensive personal information and selling it to third parties, including federal immigration authorities. The lawsuit alleged this practice posed a significant threat to civil liberties.
  • What did legal scholars and human rights activists call for LexisNexis to do in November 2019?: In November 2019, legal scholars and human rights activists urged LexisNexis to cease its work with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). They argued that the company's collaboration directly contributed to the deportation of undocumented migrants.
  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.

In November 2019, activists urged LexisNexis to stop collaborating with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), citing concerns about deportations.

Answer: True

Activists called upon LexisNexis in November 2019 to cease its cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), expressing concerns regarding the impact on deportation processes.

Related Concepts:

  • What did legal scholars and human rights activists call for LexisNexis to do in November 2019?: In November 2019, legal scholars and human rights activists urged LexisNexis to cease its work with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). They argued that the company's collaboration directly contributed to the deportation of undocumented migrants.
  • What was LexisNexis Risk Solutions accused of in a 2022 lawsuit filed by immigration advocates?: In a 2022 lawsuit, LexisNexis Risk Solutions was accused by immigration advocates of violating Illinois law by collecting and combining extensive personal information and selling it to third parties, including federal immigration authorities. The lawsuit alleged this practice posed a significant threat to civil liberties.

NOYB, a privacy group, filed a complaint against LexisNexis for allegedly violating GDPR by collecting European citizens' data without explicit consent.

Answer: True

The privacy advocacy group NOYB lodged a complaint against LexisNexis, alleging violations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) concerning the acquisition of European citizens' data without requisite consent.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific accusation was made by NOYB against LexisNexis regarding GDPR?: NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data of European citizens, including names, addresses, and email addresses, without their explicit consent and without providing an opportunity to opt out.
  • What is NOYB, and what did it allege regarding LexisNexis and the GDPR?: NOYB (None of Your Business) is a European privacy advocacy group that filed a complaint alleging LexisNexis violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). NOYB claimed LexisNexis collected and stored European citizens' personal data without explicit consent.
  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.

A March 2024 class-action lawsuit in New Jersey accused LexisNexis of violating state privacy laws related to personal information removal.

Answer: True

In March 2024, a class-action lawsuit was filed in New Jersey alleging that LexisNexis infringed upon state privacy statutes concerning the removal of personal information.

Related Concepts:

  • What law did two anonymous plaintiffs in New Jersey allege LexisNexis violated in a March 2024 class-action lawsuit?: In March 2024, two anonymous plaintiffs in New Jersey filed a class-action lawsuit alleging that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law. This law in New Jersey pertains to the removal of personal information from websites, particularly for government officials.
  • What was the outcome of the lawsuit filed in New Jersey in March 2024 regarding Daniel's Law?: The class-action lawsuit filed in New Jersey alleged that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law by failing to honor requests to remove personal information and by allegedly retaliating against those who made such requests. The suit also claimed the company published reports on minor children.
  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.

The French data protection authority (CNIL) fined LexisNexis €100,000 in 2023 for inadequate data usage transparency and consent procedures under GDPR.

Answer: True

LexisNexis received a €100,000 fine from the French data protection authority (CNIL) in 2023 due to non-compliance with GDPR requirements regarding data usage transparency and the procurement of user consent.

Related Concepts:

  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.
  • What did the Norwegian Consumer Council report in 2021 about LexisNexis's data collection?: In 2021, the Norwegian Consumer Council reported that LexisNexis had collected data on millions of people, including personal details and social media activity. The report also indicated that this data was shared with third parties without individuals' knowledge or consent.
  • What specific accusation was made by NOYB against LexisNexis regarding GDPR?: NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data of European citizens, including names, addresses, and email addresses, without their explicit consent and without providing an opportunity to opt out.

A 2021 report by the Norwegian Consumer Council indicated that LexisNexis collected data on millions, including personal details and social media activity, sharing it without consent.

Answer: True

A 2021 report from the Norwegian Consumer Council highlighted concerns regarding LexisNexis's data collection practices, noting the acquisition of personal details and social media activity from millions of individuals, which was allegedly shared without consent.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Norwegian Consumer Council report in 2021 about LexisNexis's data collection?: In 2021, the Norwegian Consumer Council reported that LexisNexis had collected data on millions of people, including personal details and social media activity. The report also indicated that this data was shared with third parties without individuals' knowledge or consent.
  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.
  • What specific accusation was made by NOYB against LexisNexis regarding GDPR?: NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data of European citizens, including names, addresses, and email addresses, without their explicit consent and without providing an opportunity to opt out.

NOYB's complaint against LexisNexis focused on alleged violations of the GDPR concerning the collection and storage of European citizens' data without explicit consent.

Answer: True

The complaint filed by NOYB against LexisNexis centered on allegations of GDPR violations, specifically related to the collection and retention of European citizens' personal data without obtaining explicit consent.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific accusation was made by NOYB against LexisNexis regarding GDPR?: NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data of European citizens, including names, addresses, and email addresses, without their explicit consent and without providing an opportunity to opt out.
  • What is NOYB, and what did it allege regarding LexisNexis and the GDPR?: NOYB (None of Your Business) is a European privacy advocacy group that filed a complaint alleging LexisNexis violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). NOYB claimed LexisNexis collected and stored European citizens' personal data without explicit consent.
  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.

The March 2024 New Jersey lawsuit alleged LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law by failing to remove personal information and publishing reports on minor children.

Answer: True

The class-action lawsuit initiated in New Jersey in March 2024 contended that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law through its alleged failure to remove personal information and the publication of reports concerning minor children.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the lawsuit filed in New Jersey in March 2024 regarding Daniel's Law?: The class-action lawsuit filed in New Jersey alleged that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law by failing to honor requests to remove personal information and by allegedly retaliating against those who made such requests. The suit also claimed the company published reports on minor children.
  • What law did two anonymous plaintiffs in New Jersey allege LexisNexis violated in a March 2024 class-action lawsuit?: In March 2024, two anonymous plaintiffs in New Jersey filed a class-action lawsuit alleging that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law. This law in New Jersey pertains to the removal of personal information from websites, particularly for government officials.

What sensitive personal information was compromised during the 2005 data breach related to LexisNexis's Seisint division?

Answer: Passwords, names, Social Security numbers, and driver's license numbers.

The 2005 data breach compromised sensitive customer information, including passwords, names, Social Security numbers, and driver's license numbers, from LexisNexis's Seisint division.

Related Concepts:

  • What types of personal information were stolen during the 2005 LexisNexis data breach?: During the 2005 data breach, hackers stole passwords, names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and driver's license numbers of customers of LexisNexis's Seisint division. This sensitive data was compromised from the company's data aggregation services.
  • What was the initial estimate of users affected by the 2005 data breach, and what was the final number?: Initially, it was estimated that 32,000 users were affected by the 2005 data breach involving LexisNexis's Seisint division. However, this number later increased significantly to over 310,000 individuals.

What accusation was leveled against LexisNexis Risk Solutions in a 2022 lawsuit by immigration advocates?

Answer: Violating Illinois law by selling aggregated personal data to federal immigration authorities.

Immigration advocates filed a lawsuit in 2022 accusing LexisNexis Risk Solutions of violating Illinois law through the sale of aggregated personal data to federal immigration authorities.

Related Concepts:

  • What was LexisNexis Risk Solutions accused of in a 2022 lawsuit filed by immigration advocates?: In a 2022 lawsuit, LexisNexis Risk Solutions was accused by immigration advocates of violating Illinois law by collecting and combining extensive personal information and selling it to third parties, including federal immigration authorities. The lawsuit alleged this practice posed a significant threat to civil liberties.
  • What did legal scholars and human rights activists call for LexisNexis to do in November 2019?: In November 2019, legal scholars and human rights activists urged LexisNexis to cease its work with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). They argued that the company's collaboration directly contributed to the deportation of undocumented migrants.

In November 2019, what did activists urge LexisNexis to stop doing?

Answer: Working with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

In November 2019, activists implored LexisNexis to cease its collaboration with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), citing ethical concerns.

Related Concepts:

  • What did legal scholars and human rights activists call for LexisNexis to do in November 2019?: In November 2019, legal scholars and human rights activists urged LexisNexis to cease its work with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). They argued that the company's collaboration directly contributed to the deportation of undocumented migrants.

What was the main allegation made by the European privacy group NOYB against LexisNexis regarding the GDPR?

Answer: Collecting and storing European citizens' personal data without explicit consent.

The European privacy group NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data belonging to European citizens without obtaining their explicit consent.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific accusation was made by NOYB against LexisNexis regarding GDPR?: NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data of European citizens, including names, addresses, and email addresses, without their explicit consent and without providing an opportunity to opt out.
  • What is NOYB, and what did it allege regarding LexisNexis and the GDPR?: NOYB (None of Your Business) is a European privacy advocacy group that filed a complaint alleging LexisNexis violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). NOYB claimed LexisNexis collected and stored European citizens' personal data without explicit consent.
  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.

What specific law was allegedly violated by LexisNexis in a March 2024 class-action lawsuit filed in New Jersey?

Answer: Daniel's Law

A class-action lawsuit filed in New Jersey in March 2024 alleged that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law, a state statute pertaining to the removal of personal information from public view.

Related Concepts:

  • What law did two anonymous plaintiffs in New Jersey allege LexisNexis violated in a March 2024 class-action lawsuit?: In March 2024, two anonymous plaintiffs in New Jersey filed a class-action lawsuit alleging that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law. This law in New Jersey pertains to the removal of personal information from websites, particularly for government officials.
  • What was the outcome of the lawsuit filed in New Jersey in March 2024 regarding Daniel's Law?: The class-action lawsuit filed in New Jersey alleged that LexisNexis violated Daniel's Law by failing to honor requests to remove personal information and by allegedly retaliating against those who made such requests. The suit also claimed the company published reports on minor children.

Why did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose a fine on LexisNexis in 2023?

Answer: For failing to properly inform individuals about data usage and obtain consent (GDPR violation).

The CNIL fined LexisNexis in 2023 due to non-compliance with GDPR regulations, specifically concerning inadequate transparency about data usage and insufficient procedures for obtaining user consent.

Related Concepts:

  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.
  • What did the Norwegian Consumer Council report in 2021 about LexisNexis's data collection?: In 2021, the Norwegian Consumer Council reported that LexisNexis had collected data on millions of people, including personal details and social media activity. The report also indicated that this data was shared with third parties without individuals' knowledge or consent.
  • What specific accusation was made by NOYB against LexisNexis regarding GDPR?: NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data of European citizens, including names, addresses, and email addresses, without their explicit consent and without providing an opportunity to opt out.

According to a 2021 report by the Norwegian Consumer Council, what was a key finding regarding LexisNexis's data collection practices?

Answer: Personal details and social media activity were collected and shared without consent.

The 2021 Norwegian Consumer Council report highlighted that LexisNexis collected personal details and social media activity from millions of individuals, allegedly sharing this data without their consent.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Norwegian Consumer Council report in 2021 about LexisNexis's data collection?: In 2021, the Norwegian Consumer Council reported that LexisNexis had collected data on millions of people, including personal details and social media activity. The report also indicated that this data was shared with third parties without individuals' knowledge or consent.
  • What fine did the French data protection authority (CNIL) impose on LexisNexis in 2023, and why?: In 2023, the French data protection authority, CNIL, fined LexisNexis €100,000 for failing to properly inform individuals about how their data was being used, which was a violation of the GDPR. The authority found that the company did not provide clear information or obtain necessary consent for its data collection and processing practices.
  • What specific accusation was made by NOYB against LexisNexis regarding GDPR?: NOYB alleged that LexisNexis violated the GDPR by collecting and storing personal data of European citizens, including names, addresses, and email addresses, without their explicit consent and without providing an opportunity to opt out.

Operational Details and Industry Recognition

LexisNexis is primarily identified as a European company specializing in software development, with its headquarters located in London.

Answer: False

LexisNexis is a global information and analytics provider, a subsidiary of RELX, which is headquartered in London. However, LexisNexis itself is often described as an American company with significant operations and headquarters in New York, not primarily a European software development company based in London.

Related Concepts:

  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.

LexisNexis was recognized by Training magazine on its 'Training Top 125' list between 2007 and 2010 for its employee development programs.

Answer: True

LexisNexis received consistent acknowledgment from Training magazine, being included in its 'Training Top 125' list from 2007 to 2010, highlighting its commitment to employee training initiatives.

Related Concepts:

  • What recognition did LexisNexis receive from Training magazine between 2007 and 2010?: Between 2007 and 2010, Training magazine inducted LexisNexis into its 'Training Top 125' list. This recognition highlighted the company's commitment to employee training and development programs.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.

LexisNexis SmartMeeting received the Stevie Award for sales and customer service in 2013.

Answer: True

In 2013, LexisNexis SmartMeeting was honored with the Stevie Award, recognizing its excellence in sales and customer service.

Related Concepts:

  • What award did LexisNexis SmartMeeting win in 2013?: LexisNexis SmartMeeting won the Stevie Award for sales and customer service in 2013. This award recognized the product's excellence in customer-facing business functions.

The official website for LexisNexis is accessible at www.lexisnexis.com.

Answer: True

The primary online presence for LexisNexis can be found at www.lexisnexis.com, serving as the gateway to its services and information.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the official website for LexisNexis?: The official website address for LexisNexis is www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page. This portal serves as the primary online presence for the company's services and information.
  • How are LexisNexis services primarily delivered?: LexisNexis services are primarily delivered through two websites that require separate paid subscriptions. This model provides access to its extensive databases and research tools.
  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.

What type of company is LexisNexis, and where is it headquartered?

Answer: An American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York.

LexisNexis is described as an American data analytics company with its headquarters situated in New York, New York, although it operates globally as a subsidiary of the London-based RELX.

Related Concepts:

  • What is LexisNexis and where is it headquartered?: LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York. It provides various databases accessed through online portals for legal research, news search, and consumer information.
  • What is the parent company of LexisNexis?: LexisNexis is a subsidiary of RELX, which was formerly known as Reed Elsevier. RELX is a global provider of information and analytics services.
  • What was the size of LexisNexis's electronic database for legal and public-records information as of 2006?: As of 2006, LexisNexis possessed the world's largest electronic database for legal and public-records-related information. This vast collection underscored its leading position in the industry.

Between 2007 and 2010, LexisNexis received consistent recognition from which magazine for its training programs?

Answer: Training Magazine

Training Magazine recognized LexisNexis for its employee development programs by including it in its 'Training Top 125' list for consecutive years between 2007 and 2010.

Related Concepts:

  • What recognition did LexisNexis receive from Training magazine between 2007 and 2010?: Between 2007 and 2010, Training magazine inducted LexisNexis into its 'Training Top 125' list. This recognition highlighted the company's commitment to employee training and development programs.

What award did LexisNexis SmartMeeting win in 2013?

Answer: The Stevie Award for sales and customer service

LexisNexis SmartMeeting received the Stevie Award for sales and customer service in 2013, acknowledging its achievements in these areas.

Related Concepts:

  • What award did LexisNexis SmartMeeting win in 2013?: LexisNexis SmartMeeting won the Stevie Award for sales and customer service in 2013. This award recognized the product's excellence in customer-facing business functions.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy