Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?

California Per Capita Income Analysis (2010-2014)

At a Glance

Title: California Per Capita Income Analysis (2010-2014)

Total Categories: 7

Category Stats

  • Statewide Income Averages and Comparisons: 3 flashcards, 4 questions
  • County-Level Income Analysis: 46 flashcards, 18 questions
  • Geographic Concentration of Income: 4 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Population and Density Correlations: 2 flashcards, 7 questions
  • Specific High-Income Locations: 18 flashcards, 21 questions
  • Specific Low-Income Locations: 11 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Income Mapping and Visualization: 2 flashcards, 4 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 86
  • True/False Questions: 42
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 28
  • Total Questions: 70

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about California Per Capita Income Analysis (2010-2014)

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "List of California locations by income" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: California Per Capita Income Analysis (2010-2014)

Study Guide: California Per Capita Income Analysis (2010-2014)

Statewide Income Averages and Comparisons

The state's overall per capita income was $29,906, median household income was $95,521, and median family income was $109,349.

Answer: True

Between 2010-2014, California's per capita income was $29,906, median household income was $95,521, and median family income was $109,349.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.
  • What were the overall per capita income, median household income, and median family income for the entire state of California, according to the provided data?: According to the provided data, the entire state of California had a per capita income of $29,906, a median household income of $95,521, and a median family income of $109,349.

What was the per capita income for California between 2010 and 2014?

Answer: $29,906

The per capita income for California between 2010 and 2014 was $29,906. The figure $48,013 represents the median household income for the state during that period.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.
  • What were the overall per capita income, median household income, and median family income for the entire state of California, according to the provided data?: According to the provided data, the entire state of California had a per capita income of $29,906, a median household income of $95,521, and a median family income of $109,349.

According to the 2010-2014 data, approximately what fraction of California's counties had per capita incomes exceeding the state average?

Answer: One-third

Approximately one-third of California's counties had per capita incomes exceeding the state average during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the distribution of per capita income compare across California locations during the 2010-2014 period?: During the 2010-2014 period, approximately one-third of California's counties and one-third of its places had per capita incomes that exceeded the state average. This suggests a relatively even, though not uniform, distribution of higher incomes across the state.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

What was the overall median household income for the state of California?

Answer: $95,521

The overall median household income for the state of California was $95,521.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the overall per capita income, median household income, and median family income for the entire state of California, according to the provided data?: According to the provided data, the entire state of California had a per capita income of $29,906, a median household income of $95,521, and a median family income of $109,349.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

County-Level Income Analysis

California's per capita income between 2010 and 2014 was $48,013.

Answer: False

The state's per capita income between 2010 and 2014 was $29,906. The figure $48,013 likely refers to median household income or data from a different period.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.
  • What were the overall per capita income, median household income, and median family income for the entire state of California, according to the provided data?: According to the provided data, the entire state of California had a per capita income of $29,906, a median household income of $95,521, and a median family income of $109,349.

Approximately two-thirds of California's counties had per capita incomes exceeding the state average during the 2010-2014 period.

Answer: False

Approximately one-third of California's counties had per capita incomes exceeding the state average during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the distribution of per capita income compare across California locations during the 2010-2014 period?: During the 2010-2014 period, approximately one-third of California's counties and one-third of its places had per capita incomes that exceeded the state average. This suggests a relatively even, though not uniform, distribution of higher incomes across the state.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

San Francisco County's per capita income ($49,986) was lower than the state's average per capita income ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: False

San Francisco County's per capita income of $49,986 was significantly higher than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for San Francisco County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: San Francisco County had a per capita income of $49,986. This was significantly higher than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Los Angeles County's per capita income ($27,987) was higher than the state's average per capita income ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: False

Los Angeles County's per capita income of $27,987 was lower than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Los Angeles County according to the table?: According to the table, Los Angeles County had a per capita income of $27,987.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Santa Clara County's per capita income ($42,666) was considerably higher than the state's average per capita income ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

Santa Clara County's per capita income of $42,666 was considerably higher than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Santa Clara County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Santa Clara County had a per capita income of $42,666. This was considerably higher than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.

Kern County's per capita income ($20,467) was significantly lower than the state's average per capita income ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

Kern County's per capita income of $20,467 was significantly lower than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Kern County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Kern County had a per capita income of $20,467. This was significantly lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Tulare County's per capita income ($17,888) was considerably lower than the state's average per capita income ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

Tulare County's per capita income of $17,888 was considerably lower than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Tulare County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Tulare County had a per capita income of $17,888. This was considerably lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income for Madera County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Madera County had a per capita income of $17,797. This was lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.

Imperial County's per capita income ($16,409) was substantially lower than the state's average per capita income ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

Imperial County's per capita income of $16,409 was substantially lower than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Imperial County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Imperial County had a per capita income of $16,409. This was substantially lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income for Imperial County according to the table?: Imperial County had a per capita income of $16,409, as listed in the table.

San Mateo County's per capita income ($47,198) was substantially higher than the state's average per capita income ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

San Mateo County's per capita income of $47,198 was substantially higher than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for San Mateo County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: San Mateo County had a per capita income of $47,198. This was substantially higher than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.

Calaveras County had a per capita income of $29,296, which was slightly higher than the state's average between 2010-2014.

Answer: False

Calaveras County's per capita income of $29,296 was slightly lower than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Calaveras County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Calaveras County had a per capita income of $29,296. This was slightly lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

San Diego County's per capita income ($31,043) was higher than the state's average ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

San Diego County's per capita income of $31,043 was higher than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for San Luis Obispo County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: San Luis Obispo County had a per capita income of $30,392. This was higher than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.

Sacramento County's per capita income ($27,071) was lower than the state's average ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

Sacramento County's per capita income of $27,071 was lower than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Ventura County's per capita income ($33,308) was higher than the state's average ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: True

Ventura County's per capita income of $33,308 was higher than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Ventura County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Ventura County had a per capita income of $33,308. This was higher than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Solano County's per capita income ($29,132) was slightly higher than the state's average ($29,906) between 2010-2014.

Answer: False

Solano County's per capita income of $29,132 was slightly lower than the state's average per capita income of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Solano County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Solano County had a per capita income of $29,132. This was slightly lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Which of the following counties had a per capita income *lower* than the state average of $29,906 between 2010 and 2014?

Answer: Yolo County ($28,080)

Yolo County had a per capita income of $28,080, which is lower than the state average of $29,906. The other listed counties had per capita incomes exceeding the state average.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Yolo County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Yolo County had a per capita income of $28,080. This was lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

What was the per capita income for San Francisco County between 2010-2014, and how did it compare to the state average?

Answer: $49,986, significantly higher than the state average

San Francisco County's per capita income was $49,986, which was significantly higher than the state average of $29,906 between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for San Francisco County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: San Francisco County had a per capita income of $49,986. This was significantly higher than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Which of the following counties had a per capita income *higher* than the state average of $29,906 between 2010 and 2014?

Answer: El Dorado County ($35,128)

El Dorado County had a per capita income of $35,128, which is higher than the state average of $29,906. The other listed counties had per capita incomes below the state average.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for El Dorado County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: El Dorado County had a per capita income of $35,128. This was higher than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Which of the following counties had a per capita income significantly lower than the state average of $29,906 between 2010 and 2014?

Answer: Fresno County ($20,231)

Fresno County had a per capita income of $20,231, which is significantly lower than the state average of $29,906. The other listed counties had per capita incomes higher than the state average.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Fresno County, and how did it compare to the state's per capita income during the 2010-2014 period?: Fresno County had a per capita income of $20,231. This was lower than the state's per capita income of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Geographic Concentration of Income

Locations with the highest per capita incomes were primarily concentrated in the Central Valley according to 2010-2014 data.

Answer: False

Data from 2010-2014 indicates that the highest per capita income locations were predominantly concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area, not the Central Valley.

Related Concepts:

  • Where were the locations with the highest per capita incomes concentrated in California, according to the 2010-2014 data?: According to data from 2010-2014, locations with the highest per capita incomes were predominantly concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area. This region is known for its high cost of living, which often correlates with higher income levels.
  • Where were the locations with the lowest per capita incomes concentrated in California, according to the 2010-2014 data?: Based on the 2010-2014 data, the lowest per capita income locations were concentrated in the Central Valley. This region's economy heavily relies on agriculture, which can influence income levels.

Most of the top ten highest per capita income counties were located in Southern California, specifically around Los Angeles.

Answer: False

Of the ten counties with the highest per capita income, the majority were located in Northern California, particularly within the San Francisco Bay Area. Orange County was an exception in Southern California.

Related Concepts:

  • Where were most of the top ten highest per capita income counties in California located?: Of the ten counties with the highest per capita income, the majority were located in Northern California, particularly within the San Francisco Bay Area. Two exceptions were in the Sacramento metropolitan area.
  • Which county, located outside of Northern California, was among the top ten highest per capita income counties?: Orange County was one of the top ten counties in California with the highest per capita income. Its per capita income was approximately $5,000 more than the state's average.

According to 2010-2014 data, where were the locations with the highest per capita incomes concentrated?

Answer: The San Francisco Bay Area

Data from 2010-2014 indicates that the highest per capita income locations were predominantly concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Related Concepts:

  • Where were the locations with the highest per capita incomes concentrated in California, according to the 2010-2014 data?: According to data from 2010-2014, locations with the highest per capita incomes were predominantly concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area. This region is known for its high cost of living, which often correlates with higher income levels.
  • How did the distribution of per capita income compare across California locations during the 2010-2014 period?: During the 2010-2014 period, approximately one-third of California's counties and one-third of its places had per capita incomes that exceeded the state average. This suggests a relatively even, though not uniform, distribution of higher incomes across the state.

Based on 2010-2014 data, where were the lowest per capita income locations concentrated in California?

Answer: The Central Valley

The lowest per capita income locations in California were concentrated in the Central Valley according to data from 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • Where were the locations with the lowest per capita incomes concentrated in California, according to the 2010-2014 data?: Based on the 2010-2014 data, the lowest per capita income locations were concentrated in the Central Valley. This region's economy heavily relies on agriculture, which can influence income levels.
  • What geographical region was home to most of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California?: Seven of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California were located in the Central Valley. The remaining three included two rural counties in Northern California and Imperial County.

Population and Density Correlations

Places with lower per capita incomes generally had significantly larger populations and higher population densities compared to places with higher per capita incomes.

Answer: False

Analysis of places (as opposed to counties) showed that those with lower per capita incomes did not generally have significantly larger populations or higher population densities compared to higher-income places; the populations and densities were roughly similar.

Related Concepts:

  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.

Counties with per capita incomes above the state average were, on average, less populated and less dense than those below the state average.

Answer: False

Counties with per capita incomes above the state average were, on average, more populated (twice the population) and significantly denser (eight times denser) than those below the state average.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the average population and population density differ between California counties with per capita incomes above and below the state average?: Counties with per capita incomes above the state average had, on average, twice the population (921,098) compared to those below the state average (546,543). Furthermore, these higher-income counties were significantly denser, averaging 1,540.2 persons per square mile, eight times the density of counties with lower per capita incomes (192.1 persons per square mile).
  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.

Counties with per capita incomes higher than the state average tended to be more densely populated than counties with lower per capita incomes.

Answer: True

Counties with higher per capita incomes were, on average, eight times denser than counties with lower per capita incomes.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the average population and population density differ between California counties with per capita incomes above and below the state average?: Counties with per capita incomes above the state average had, on average, twice the population (921,098) compared to those below the state average (546,543). Furthermore, these higher-income counties were significantly denser, averaging 1,540.2 persons per square mile, eight times the density of counties with lower per capita incomes (192.1 persons per square mile).
  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.

Counties with per capita incomes below the state average were, on average, eight times less dense than those above the state average.

Answer: True

Counties with per capita incomes below the state average were, on average, eight times less dense than counties with per capita incomes above the state average.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the average population and population density differ between California counties with per capita incomes above and below the state average?: Counties with per capita incomes above the state average had, on average, twice the population (921,098) compared to those below the state average (546,543). Furthermore, these higher-income counties were significantly denser, averaging 1,540.2 persons per square mile, eight times the density of counties with lower per capita incomes (192.1 persons per square mile).
  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.

How did the average population of counties with per capita incomes above the state average compare to those below the state average (2010-2014)?

Answer: They had twice the average population.

Counties with per capita incomes above the state average had, on average, twice the population of counties with incomes below the state average during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the average population and population density differ between California counties with per capita incomes above and below the state average?: Counties with per capita incomes above the state average had, on average, twice the population (921,098) compared to those below the state average (546,543). Furthermore, these higher-income counties were significantly denser, averaging 1,540.2 persons per square mile, eight times the density of counties with lower per capita incomes (192.1 persons per square mile).
  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.

How did the population density of higher-income counties compare to lower-income counties between 2010-2014?

Answer: Higher-income counties were eight times denser.

Counties with higher per capita incomes were, on average, eight times denser than counties with lower per capita incomes between 2010-2014.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the average population and population density differ between California counties with per capita incomes above and below the state average?: Counties with per capita incomes above the state average had, on average, twice the population (921,098) compared to those below the state average (546,543). Furthermore, these higher-income counties were significantly denser, averaging 1,540.2 persons per square mile, eight times the density of counties with lower per capita incomes (192.1 persons per square mile).
  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.

Which statement accurately reflects the comparison between counties with per capita incomes above and below the state average (2010-2014)?

Answer: Higher-income counties were more populated and more dense.

Counties with higher per capita incomes were, on average, more populated (twice the population) and significantly denser (eight times denser) than counties with lower per capita incomes.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the average population and population density differ between California counties with per capita incomes above and below the state average?: Counties with per capita incomes above the state average had, on average, twice the population (921,098) compared to those below the state average (546,543). Furthermore, these higher-income counties were significantly denser, averaging 1,540.2 persons per square mile, eight times the density of counties with lower per capita incomes (192.1 persons per square mile).
  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.

Specific High-Income Locations

Marin County recorded the highest per capita income in California, exceeding $58,000 between 2010 and 2014.

Answer: True

Between 2010 and 2014, Marin County had the highest per capita income in California, recorded at $58,004.

Related Concepts:

  • Which county in California had the highest per capita income during the period analyzed, and by how much did it exceed the second-highest county?: Marin County had the highest per capita income, recorded at $58,004. This was nearly $10,000 higher than San Francisco County, which ranked second in per capita income.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Orange County was among the top ten highest per capita income counties and had an income approximately $5,000 above the state average during 2010-2014.

Answer: True

Orange County was among the top ten highest per capita income counties, with its income being approximately $5,000 higher than the state average of $29,906 during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • Which county, located outside of Northern California, was among the top ten highest per capita income counties?: Orange County was one of the top ten counties in California with the highest per capita income. Its per capita income was approximately $5,000 more than the state's average.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Santa Clara County had the highest per capita income among California counties with a population exceeding one million, with an income of $42,666.

Answer: True

Santa Clara County recorded the highest per capita income ($42,666) among California counties with populations over one million during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • Among California counties with a population exceeding one million, which had the highest per capita income?: Santa Clara County had the highest per capita income among California counties with a population exceeding one million, with a per capita income of $42,666.

San Francisco was the city with the highest per capita income among those with populations over 100,000, earning $49,986.

Answer: True

San Francisco had the highest per capita income ($49,986) among California cities with populations exceeding 100,000 during the 2010-2014 period.

Related Concepts:

  • Which city in California had the highest per capita income among places with a population over 100,000?: San Francisco had the highest per capita income among California places with a population exceeding 100,000, with a per capita income of $49,986.
  • What was the per capita income for San Francisco, and what was its population?: San Francisco had a per capita income of $49,986 and a population of 829,072.

Atherton, located in San Mateo County, had a per capita income of $144,197 according to the table.

Answer: True

Atherton, situated in San Mateo County, recorded a per capita income of $144,197 in the provided data.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Atherton, and what county is it located in?: Atherton, located in San Mateo County, had a per capita income of $144,197 according to the table.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

San Francisco had a per capita income of $49,986 and a population of 829,072.

Answer: True

San Francisco reported a per capita income of $49,986 and a population of 829,072, making it the city with the highest per capita income among those with populations over 100,000.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for San Francisco, and what was its population?: San Francisco had a per capita income of $49,986 and a population of 829,072.
  • Which city in California had the highest per capita income among places with a population over 100,000?: San Francisco had the highest per capita income among California places with a population exceeding 100,000, with a per capita income of $49,986.

Sunnyvale ranked among the top five highest per capita income places for populations over 100,000, with an income of $48,203.

Answer: True

Sunnyvale was among the top five highest per capita income places for populations over 100,000, with a per capita income of $48,203.

Related Concepts:

  • Name three other places with populations over 100,000 that also ranked among the top five highest per capita income places in that population class.: Sunnyvale ($48,203), San Mateo ($46,782), and Thousand Oaks ($46,231) were among the top five places with the highest per capita income for those with populations over 100,000, alongside San Francisco and Carlsbad.
  • What was the median household income for Sunnyvale, and what was its per capita income?: Sunnyvale had a median household income of $103,257 and a per capita income of $48,203.

San Jose's per capita income was approximately $5,000 lower than the state average for places with populations comparable to San Francisco.

Answer: False

San Jose's per capita income of $34,992 was approximately $5,000 higher than the state average for places with populations comparable to San Francisco.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income of San Jose, and how did it compare to the state average for places with populations similar to San Francisco?: San Jose had a per capita income of $34,992. For places with populations comparable to San Francisco, San Jose's per capita income was approximately $5,000 higher than the state average.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Alameda County had a per capita income of $36,439 according to the table.

Answer: True

According to the table, Alameda County's per capita income was $36,439.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Alameda County according to the table?: According to the table, Alameda County had a per capita income of $36,439.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Marin County had a median household income of $91,529 according to the table.

Answer: True

The table indicates that Marin County had a median household income of $91,529.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the median household income for Marin County according to the table?: The table shows that Marin County had a median household income of $91,529.
  • What was the median family income for San Francisco County according to the table?: The table indicates that San Francisco County had a median family income of $93,391.

San Jose's per capita income of $34,992 was approximately $5,000 higher than the state average for places with populations comparable to San Francisco.

Answer: True

San Jose's per capita income of $34,992 was approximately $5,000 higher than the state average for places with populations similar to San Francisco.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income of San Jose, and how did it compare to the state average for places with populations similar to San Francisco?: San Jose had a per capita income of $34,992. For places with populations comparable to San Francisco, San Jose's per capita income was approximately $5,000 higher than the state average.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Contra Costa County had a per capita income of $38,770, making it the second-highest among counties with populations over one million.

Answer: True

Contra Costa County had a per capita income of $38,770, ranking it second highest among counties with populations over one million, after Santa Clara County.

Related Concepts:

  • Which county, with a population over one million, had the second-highest per capita income?: Contra Costa County, with a population exceeding one million, had the second-highest per capita income among counties in that population bracket, at $38,770.
  • Among California counties with a population exceeding one million, which had the highest per capita income?: Santa Clara County had the highest per capita income among California counties with a population exceeding one million, with a per capita income of $42,666.

Which county had the highest per capita income in California during the 2010-2014 period?

Answer: Marin County

Marin County recorded the highest per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014, at $58,004.

Related Concepts:

  • Which county in California had the highest per capita income during the period analyzed, and by how much did it exceed the second-highest county?: Marin County had the highest per capita income, recorded at $58,004. This was nearly $10,000 higher than San Francisco County, which ranked second in per capita income.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Which city had the highest per capita income among California places with a population over 100,000?

Answer: San Francisco

San Francisco had the highest per capita income among California places with populations exceeding 100,000, with a figure of $49,986.

Related Concepts:

  • Which city in California had the highest per capita income among places with a population over 100,000?: San Francisco had the highest per capita income among California places with a population exceeding 100,000, with a per capita income of $49,986.
  • What was the per capita income for San Francisco, and what was its population?: San Francisco had a per capita income of $49,986 and a population of 829,072.

What was the median household income for Marin County according to the table?

Answer: $91,529

The table indicates that Marin County had a median household income of $91,529.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the median household income for Marin County according to the table?: The table shows that Marin County had a median household income of $91,529.
  • What was the median family income for San Francisco County according to the table?: The table indicates that San Francisco County had a median family income of $93,391.

Which county, with a population over one million, had the second-highest per capita income?

Answer: Contra Costa County

Contra Costa County, with a population over one million, had the second-highest per capita income among counties in that bracket, at $38,770, following Santa Clara County.

Related Concepts:

  • Which county, with a population over one million, had the second-highest per capita income?: Contra Costa County, with a population exceeding one million, had the second-highest per capita income among counties in that population bracket, at $38,770.
  • Among California counties with a population exceeding one million, which had the highest per capita income?: Santa Clara County had the highest per capita income among California counties with a population exceeding one million, with a per capita income of $42,666.

Which of the following places had the highest per capita income among those listed with populations over 100,000?

Answer: San Francisco ($49,986)

San Francisco had the highest per capita income ($49,986) among places with populations over 100,000, followed by Sunnyvale ($48,203).

Related Concepts:

  • Which city in California had the highest per capita income among places with a population over 100,000?: San Francisco had the highest per capita income among California places with a population exceeding 100,000, with a per capita income of $49,986.
  • What was the per capita income for San Francisco, and what was its population?: San Francisco had a per capita income of $49,986 and a population of 829,072.

What was the per capita income for Atherton, noted as being in San Mateo County?

Answer: $144,197

Atherton, located in San Mateo County, had a per capita income of $144,197 according to the table.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Atherton, and what county is it located in?: Atherton, located in San Mateo County, had a per capita income of $144,197 according to the table.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

What was the per capita income for San Jose, and how did it compare to the state average for places with populations similar to San Francisco?

Answer: $34,992, approximately $5,000 higher than the state average

San Jose's per capita income was $34,992, which was approximately $5,000 higher than the state average for places with populations comparable to San Francisco.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income of San Jose, and how did it compare to the state average for places with populations similar to San Francisco?: San Jose had a per capita income of $34,992. For places with populations comparable to San Francisco, San Jose's per capita income was approximately $5,000 higher than the state average.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

What was the median family income for San Francisco County according to the table?

Answer: $93,391

The table indicates that San Francisco County had a median family income of $93,391.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the median family income for San Francisco County according to the table?: The table indicates that San Francisco County had a median family income of $93,391.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

What was the per capita income for Alameda County according to the table?

Answer: $36,439

According to the table, Alameda County had a per capita income of $36,439.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Alameda County according to the table?: According to the table, Alameda County had a per capita income of $36,439.
  • What was the per capita income in California between 2010 and 2014?: Between the years 2010 and 2014, California's per capita income was $29,906. This figure represents the average income earned per person during that five-year period.

Specific Low-Income Locations

Seven of the ten lowest-income counties were landlocked, with Del Norte County being the only exception.

Answer: True

Seven of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes were landlocked. Del Norte County was noted as the exception among these low-income counties.

Related Concepts:

  • What characteristic did most of the lowest-income counties share, besides their location in the Central Valley or Northern California?: Most of the lowest-income counties were landlocked, with the exception of Del Norte County. Additionally, all of these counties had populations not exceeding 1,000,000.
  • What geographical region was home to most of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California?: Seven of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California were located in the Central Valley. The remaining three included two rural counties in Northern California and Imperial County.

East Los Angeles was identified as having the largest population among the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population over 50,000.

Answer: True

East Los Angeles had the largest population among the ten places with the lowest per capita income and populations exceeding 50,000, with seven of these places located in Los Angeles County.

Imperial County had the lowest per capita income listed in the table, at $16,409.

Answer: True

Imperial County is listed with the lowest per capita income among the analyzed areas, at $16,409.

Related Concepts:

  • Which county had the lowest per capita income listed in the table, and what was that income?: The county with the lowest per capita income listed in the table is Imperial County, with a per capita income of $16,409.
  • What was the per capita income for Imperial County according to the table?: Imperial County had a per capita income of $16,409, as listed in the table.

Adelanto, in San Bernardino County, had a median household income of $35,262 and a per capita income of $9,998.

Answer: True

Adelanto, located in San Bernardino County, had a median household income of $35,262 and a per capita income of $9,998.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the median household income for Adelanto, and what county is it located in?: Adelanto, located in San Bernardino County, had a median household income of $35,262.
  • What was the per capita income for Adelanto, and what was its median household income?: Adelanto had a per capita income of $9,998 and a median household income of $35,262.

Seven of the ten lowest-income places (population > 50,000) were located in Los Angeles County.

Answer: True

Seven of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and populations exceeding 50,000 were indeed located in Los Angeles County.

Related Concepts:

  • In which county were most of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population over 50,000 located?: Seven of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population exceeding 50,000 were located in Los Angeles County. East Los Angeles had the largest population among these specific low-income places.
  • What geographical region was home to most of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California?: Seven of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California were located in the Central Valley. The remaining three included two rural counties in Northern California and Imperial County.

Adelanto had a per capita income of $35,262.

Answer: False

Adelanto's per capita income was $9,998, not $35,262. The latter figure represents its median household income.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Adelanto, and what was its median household income?: Adelanto had a per capita income of $9,998 and a median household income of $35,262.
  • What was the median household income for Adelanto, and what county is it located in?: Adelanto, located in San Bernardino County, had a median household income of $35,262.

What characteristic did most of the lowest-income counties share, besides their location?

Answer: They were all landlocked.

Most of the counties identified with the lowest per capita incomes were landlocked, with Del Norte County being the primary exception among them.

Related Concepts:

  • What characteristic did most of the lowest-income counties share, besides their location in the Central Valley or Northern California?: Most of the lowest-income counties were landlocked, with the exception of Del Norte County. Additionally, all of these counties had populations not exceeding 1,000,000.
  • What geographical region was home to most of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California?: Seven of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California were located in the Central Valley. The remaining three included two rural counties in Northern California and Imperial County.

Which county had the lowest per capita income listed in the table?

Answer: Imperial County

Imperial County had the lowest per capita income listed in the table, at $16,409.

Related Concepts:

  • Which county had the lowest per capita income listed in the table, and what was that income?: The county with the lowest per capita income listed in the table is Imperial County, with a per capita income of $16,409.
  • What was the per capita income for Imperial County according to the table?: Imperial County had a per capita income of $16,409, as listed in the table.

What was the median family income for East Los Angeles according to the table?

Answer: $41,577

East Los Angeles had a median family income of $41,577, and a per capita income of $12,905.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the median family income for East Los Angeles, and what was its per capita income?: East Los Angeles had a median family income of $41,577 and a per capita income of $12,905.
  • In which county were most of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population over 50,000 located?: Seven of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population exceeding 50,000 were located in Los Angeles County. East Los Angeles had the largest population among these specific low-income places.

What was the per capita income for Adelanto, and what was its median household income?

Answer: Per capita: $9,998, Median household: $35,262

Adelanto had a per capita income of $9,998 and a median household income of $35,262.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the per capita income for Adelanto, and what was its median household income?: Adelanto had a per capita income of $9,998 and a median household income of $35,262.
  • What was the median household income for Adelanto, and what county is it located in?: Adelanto, located in San Bernardino County, had a median household income of $35,262.

What was the median household income for Adelanto, located in San Bernardino County?

Answer: $35,262

Adelanto, located in San Bernardino County, had a median household income of $35,262.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the median household income for Adelanto, and what county is it located in?: Adelanto, located in San Bernardino County, had a median household income of $35,262.
  • What was the per capita income for Adelanto, and what was its median household income?: Adelanto had a per capita income of $9,998 and a median household income of $35,262.

Seven of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population over 50,000 were located in which county?

Answer: Los Angeles County

Seven of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and populations exceeding 50,000 were located in Los Angeles County.

Related Concepts:

  • In which county were most of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population over 50,000 located?: Seven of the ten places with the lowest per capita income and a population exceeding 50,000 were located in Los Angeles County. East Los Angeles had the largest population among these specific low-income places.
  • What geographical region was home to most of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California?: Seven of the ten counties with the lowest per capita incomes in California were located in the Central Valley. The remaining three included two rural counties in Northern California and Imperial County.

Income Mapping and Visualization

On maps showing per capita income (ACS 2016-2020), orange shading indicates higher income levels.

Answer: False

On maps of per capita income (ACS 2016-2020), orange shading indicates lower income levels, while purple shading indicates higher income levels.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the color coding on the map of California counties by per capita income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?: The map of California counties by per capita income from ACS 2016-2020 indicates that areas shaded more purple represent higher incomes, while areas shaded more orange represent lower incomes. This visual representation helps in quickly identifying income disparities across the state.
  • What does the color coding on the map of California counties by median household income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?: The map illustrating California counties by median household income (ACS 2016-2020) uses blue shading for areas with higher incomes and red shading for areas with lower incomes. This color scheme provides a visual comparison of median household income levels across different counties.

On maps of median household income (ACS 2016-2020), blue shading indicates lower income areas and red shading indicates higher income areas.

Answer: False

On maps of median household income (ACS 2016-2020), blue shading indicates higher income areas, while red shading indicates lower income areas.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the color coding on the map of California counties by median household income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?: The map illustrating California counties by median household income (ACS 2016-2020) uses blue shading for areas with higher incomes and red shading for areas with lower incomes. This color scheme provides a visual comparison of median household income levels across different counties.
  • What does the color coding on the map of California counties by per capita income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?: The map of California counties by per capita income from ACS 2016-2020 indicates that areas shaded more purple represent higher incomes, while areas shaded more orange represent lower incomes. This visual representation helps in quickly identifying income disparities across the state.

The map of California counties by per capita income (ACS 2016-2020) uses purple shading to denote lower incomes and orange shading for higher incomes.

Answer: False

The map uses purple shading for higher incomes and orange shading for lower incomes, not the other way around.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the color coding on the map of California counties by per capita income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?: The map of California counties by per capita income from ACS 2016-2020 indicates that areas shaded more purple represent higher incomes, while areas shaded more orange represent lower incomes. This visual representation helps in quickly identifying income disparities across the state.
  • What was the per capita income for Alameda County according to the table?: According to the table, Alameda County had a per capita income of $36,439.

What does the color coding on the map of California counties by per capita income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?

Answer: Purple indicates higher incomes, orange indicates lower incomes.

The map of California counties by per capita income (ACS 2016-2020) uses purple shading to denote higher income levels and orange shading for lower income levels.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the color coding on the map of California counties by per capita income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?: The map of California counties by per capita income from ACS 2016-2020 indicates that areas shaded more purple represent higher incomes, while areas shaded more orange represent lower incomes. This visual representation helps in quickly identifying income disparities across the state.
  • What does the color coding on the map of California counties by median household income (ACS 2016-2020) signify?: The map illustrating California counties by median household income (ACS 2016-2020) uses blue shading for areas with higher incomes and red shading for areas with lower incomes. This color scheme provides a visual comparison of median household income levels across different counties.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy