Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



The Meuse–Argonne Offensive: A Pivotal Campaign of WWI

At a Glance

Title: The Meuse–Argonne Offensive: A Pivotal Campaign of WWI

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Overview and Strategic Context: 15 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Forces, Leadership, and Casualties: 22 flashcards, 20 questions
  • Phase I: Initial Assault and Early Challenges (Sept 26 - Oct 3): 6 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Phase II: Reorganization and Breakthroughs (Oct 4 - Oct 31): 8 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Phase III: Final Advance and Conclusion (Nov 1 - Nov 11): 5 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Logistics, Equipment, and Tactical Details: 5 flashcards, 6 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 61
  • True/False Questions: 34
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 35
  • Total Questions: 69

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The Meuse–Argonne Offensive: A Pivotal Campaign of WWI

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Meuse\u2013Argonne offensive" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The Meuse–Argonne Offensive: A Pivotal Campaign of WWI

Study Guide: The Meuse–Argonne Offensive: A Pivotal Campaign of WWI

Overview and Strategic Context

The Meuse–Argonne offensive was a minor engagement on the Western Front, separate from the broader Hundred Days Offensive.

Answer: False

The Meuse–Argonne offensive was a significant part of the final Allied Hundred Days Offensive, not a minor or separate engagement.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Meuse–Argonne offensive, and what was its broader context in World War I?: The Meuse–Argonne offensive, also known as the Meuse River–Argonne Forest offensive, the Battles of the Meuse–Argonne, and the Meuse–Argonne campaign, was a significant part of the final Allied offensive of World War I. This offensive stretched along the entire Western Front and was one of a series of Allied attacks collectively known as the Hundred Days Offensive, which ultimately led to the end of the war.

The Meuse–Argonne offensive concluded on October 16, 1918, after 20 days of fighting.

Answer: False

The offensive lasted 47 days, from September 26, 1918, until the Armistice on November 11, 1918.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the Meuse–Argonne offensive take place?: The Meuse–Argonne offensive was fought from September 26, 1918, until the Armistice of November 11, 1918, lasting a total of 47 days.

The Meuse River was a crucial geographical feature in the area where the Meuse–Argonne offensive took place.

Answer: True

The Meuse River was indeed a crucial water obstacle on the Western Front and a key geographical feature of the offensive's location.

Related Concepts:

  • Where was the Meuse–Argonne offensive primarily located?: The offensive was located near Montfaucon, northwest of Verdun, in the present-day Grand Est region of France. The Meuse River, a crucial water obstacle on the Western Front, was a key geographical feature in the area.

The Meuse–Argonne offensive resulted in a stalemate, with no significant territorial gains for either side.

Answer: False

The offensive resulted in an Allied victory, with significant territorial gains, contributing to the end of World War I.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the overall outcome of the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The Meuse–Argonne offensive resulted in an Allied victory, which contributed to the end of World War I.

The Meuse–Argonne offensive is considered the deadliest campaign in United States Army history due to high casualties and the Spanish flu outbreak.

Answer: True

The offensive is indeed recognized as the deadliest campaign in U.S. Army history, with over 350,000 casualties, exacerbated by the Spanish flu.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is the Meuse–Argonne offensive considered the deadliest campaign in United States Army history?: The Meuse–Argonne offensive is considered the deadliest campaign in United States Army history due to over 350,000 casualties, including 26,277 American lives lost, which were exacerbated by the inexperience of many troops, the tactics employed in the early stages, and the widespread 'Spanish flu' outbreak.

For the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), the Meuse–Argonne offensive was the largest and bloodiest operation of the entire war.

Answer: True

The Meuse–Argonne offensive was the largest and bloodiest operation for the AEF, though its overall scale was limited compared to other Western Front battles.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Meuse–Argonne offensive compare in scale to other battles on the Western Front for the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF)?: While the Meuse–Argonne offensive was the largest and bloodiest operation of the entire war for the AEF, its size was considered limited compared to other battles on the Western Front, and the operation itself was secondary, being far from the main offensive axis.

One of the main objectives of the Allied forces was to establish a permanent defensive line along the Meuse River.

Answer: False

The Allied objectives included piercing the Hindenburg Line, advancing deep into German territory, and forcing surrender, not establishing a permanent defensive line.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the three main objectives of the Allied forces in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The three main objectives were to pierce the heavily fortified Hindenburg Line, advance deep into German territory to disrupt communication and supply lines, and ultimately force Germany to surrender and end the war.

What was the Meuse–Argonne offensive primarily known as in the broader context of World War I?

Answer: A significant part of the final Allied Hundred Days Offensive.

The Meuse–Argonne offensive was a significant component of the broader Hundred Days Offensive, which ultimately led to the end of World War I.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Meuse–Argonne offensive, and what was its broader context in World War I?: The Meuse–Argonne offensive, also known as the Meuse River–Argonne Forest offensive, the Battles of the Meuse–Argonne, and the Meuse–Argonne campaign, was a significant part of the final Allied offensive of World War I. This offensive stretched along the entire Western Front and was one of a series of Allied attacks collectively known as the Hundred Days Offensive, which ultimately led to the end of the war.

When did the Meuse–Argonne offensive officially conclude?

Answer: November 11, 1918

The Meuse–Argonne offensive concluded on November 11, 1918, with the signing of the Armistice.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the Meuse–Argonne offensive take place?: The Meuse–Argonne offensive was fought from September 26, 1918, until the Armistice of November 11, 1918, lasting a total of 47 days.

Which geographical feature was identified as a crucial water obstacle in the area of the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: The Meuse River

The Meuse River was a crucial water obstacle and a key geographical feature in the region of the offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • Where was the Meuse–Argonne offensive primarily located?: The offensive was located near Montfaucon, northwest of Verdun, in the present-day Grand Est region of France. The Meuse River, a crucial water obstacle on the Western Front, was a key geographical feature in the area.

What was the overall outcome of the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: An Allied victory that contributed to the end of World War I.

The Meuse–Argonne offensive concluded with an Allied victory, playing a significant role in the culmination of World War I.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the overall outcome of the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The Meuse–Argonne offensive resulted in an Allied victory, which contributed to the end of World War I.

Which of the following was NOT one of the three main objectives of the Allied forces in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: To establish a permanent occupation of the Grand Est region of France.

The Allied objectives focused on piercing the Hindenburg Line, disrupting German lines, and forcing surrender, not on establishing a permanent occupation of the Grand Est region.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the three main objectives of the Allied forces in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The three main objectives were to pierce the heavily fortified Hindenburg Line, advance deep into German territory to disrupt communication and supply lines, and ultimately force Germany to surrender and end the war.

Forces, Leadership, and Casualties

Siam was one of the Allied nations that participated in the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Answer: True

Siam, alongside France and the United States, was indeed a belligerent on the Allied side during the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • Which belligerent nations participated in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The belligerents involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive were France, the United States, and Siam on the Allied side, against Germany.

The total strength of Allied personnel involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive was approximately 1,000,000.

Answer: False

Approximately 2,000,000 Allied personnel were involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive, not 1,000,000.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the approximate total strength of the Allied forces involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: Approximately 2,000,000 Allied personnel were involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

The Siamese Expeditionary Forces suffered 19 wounded during the offensive.

Answer: False

The Siamese Expeditionary Forces suffered 19 dead, not 19 wounded.

Related Concepts:

  • How many casualties did the Siamese Expeditionary Forces suffer?: The Siamese Expeditionary Forces suffered 19 dead.

German forces captured 874 artillery pieces from the Allies during the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Answer: False

Allied forces, specifically American and French, captured 874 artillery pieces from the German forces, not the other way around.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the casualties and losses for the German forces, including captured equipment?: German forces suffered 126,000 casualties, including 28,000 dead, 42,000 wounded, and 56,000 captured. Additionally, 874 artillery pieces were captured by both American and French forces.

The fresh U.S. troops significantly bolstered the Allied offensive and sharply diminished German hopes for victory.

Answer: True

The arrival of fresh, eager U.S. troops significantly bolstered the Allied offensive and diminished German hopes for victory.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the impact of the fresh U.S. troops on the overall Allied offensive and German morale?: The scale of the overall Allied offensive, significantly bolstered by the fresh, eager, but largely untried and inexperienced U.S. troops, signaled renewed vigor among the Allies and sharply diminished German hopes for victory.

All U.S. troops during the Meuse–Argonne battle served exclusively under American command.

Answer: False

Some U.S. troops, such as the Buffalo Soldiers of the 92nd and 93rd Divisions, were attached to and served under French command.

Related Concepts:

  • How was command structured for U.S. troops during the Meuse–Argonne battle, particularly regarding the Buffalo Soldiers?: Command was coordinated, with some U.S. troops, such as the Buffalo Soldiers of the 92nd and 93rd Divisions, attached to and serving under French command, for example, with the XVII Corps during the second phase of the offensive.

General John J. Pershing commanded the U.S. First Army for the entire duration of the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Answer: False

General John J. Pershing initially commanded the U.S. First Army, but Lieutenant General Hunter Liggett took command on October 16.

Related Concepts:

  • Who initially commanded the U.S. First Army during the Meuse–Argonne offensive, and who took over later?: General John J. Pershing initially commanded the U.S. First Army until October 16, after which Lieutenant General Hunter Liggett took command.

U.S. divisions of the AEF were smaller than other Allied divisions, containing 9 battalions per division.

Answer: False

U.S. divisions were oversized, containing 12 battalions per division, making them up to twice the size of other Allies' battle-depleted divisions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the relative size of U.S. divisions compared to other Allied divisions at the start of the offensive?: U.S. divisions of the AEF were oversized, containing 12 battalions per division compared to the French-British-German nine battalions per division, making them up to twice the size of other Allies' battle-depleted divisions upon arrival.

German divisions opposing the Allies consistently maintained high morale, especially those from the Western front.

Answer: False

German divisions from the Western front had poor morale, while those from the Eastern front had high morale, indicating varied, not consistently high, morale.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the condition and morale of the German divisions opposing the Allied forces?: German divisions during this period had only 50 percent or less of their initial strength. Morale varied, with divisions from the Eastern front having high morale, while those from the Western front had poor morale.

Lieutenant General Robert Lee Bullard commanded the U.S. First Army during the Meuse-Argonne offensive.

Answer: False

Lieutenant General Robert Lee Bullard commanded the U.S. *Second* Army, while the U.S. First Army was commanded by General John J. Pershing and later Lieutenant General Hunter Liggett.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the image of Lieutenant General Robert Lee Bullard represent?: The image depicts Lieutenant General Robert Lee Bullard, who commanded the U.S. Second Army.

Which of the following nations was NOT a belligerent on the Allied side during the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: Great Britain

The Allied belligerents included France, the United States, and Siam. Great Britain is not listed as a direct participant in this specific offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • Which belligerent nations participated in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The belligerents involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive were France, the United States, and Siam on the Allied side, against Germany.

Who was a primary commander for the German forces during the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: Paul von Hindenburg

Paul von Hindenburg was among the primary commanders leading the German forces during the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the primary commanders and leaders for the German forces during the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The German forces were led by Paul von Hindenburg, Erich Ludendorff, Wilhelm of Prussia, Max von Gallwitz, and Albrecht, Duke of Württemberg.

Approximately how many Allied personnel were involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: 2,000,000

Approximately 2,000,000 Allied personnel participated in the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the approximate total strength of the Allied forces involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: Approximately 2,000,000 Allied personnel were involved in the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

What were the total casualties and losses for the Allied forces in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: 192,000

The Allied forces sustained a total of 192,000 casualties and losses during the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the total casualties and losses for the Allied forces in the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: The Allied forces suffered a total of 192,000 casualties and losses during the offensive.

How many American lives were lost during the Meuse–Argonne offensive, contributing to it being the deadliest campaign in US Army history?

Answer: 26,277

American forces suffered 26,277 dead, contributing to the offensive's designation as the deadliest campaign in U.S. Army history.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the specific casualties for the American forces during the Meuse–Argonne offensive?: American forces sustained 122,063 casualties, including 26,277 dead and 95,786 wounded.

What was the impact of the fresh U.S. troops on German morale during the overall Allied offensive?

Answer: It sharply diminished German hopes for victory.

The arrival of fresh U.S. troops significantly bolstered Allied vigor and sharply diminished German hopes for victory.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the impact of the fresh U.S. troops on the overall Allied offensive and German morale?: The scale of the overall Allied offensive, significantly bolstered by the fresh, eager, but largely untried and inexperienced U.S. troops, signaled renewed vigor among the Allies and sharply diminished German hopes for victory.

Which U.S. divisions, including the Buffalo Soldiers, were sometimes attached to and served under French command during the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: The 92nd and 93rd Divisions

The 92nd and 93rd Divisions, including the Buffalo Soldiers, were sometimes attached to and served under French command during the offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • How was command structured for U.S. troops during the Meuse–Argonne battle, particularly regarding the Buffalo Soldiers?: Command was coordinated, with some U.S. troops, such as the Buffalo Soldiers of the 92nd and 93rd Divisions, attached to and serving under French command, for example, with the XVII Corps during the second phase of the offensive.

Who took command of the U.S. First Army after General John J. Pershing on October 16?

Answer: Hunter Liggett

Lieutenant General Hunter Liggett assumed command of the U.S. First Army on October 16, succeeding General John J. Pershing.

Related Concepts:

  • Who initially commanded the U.S. First Army during the Meuse–Argonne offensive, and who took over later?: General John J. Pershing initially commanded the U.S. First Army until October 16, after which Lieutenant General Hunter Liggett took command.

How did the size of U.S. divisions compare to French-British-German divisions at the start of the offensive?

Answer: U.S. divisions were oversized, with 12 battalions, up to twice the size.

U.S. divisions were significantly larger, containing 12 battalions compared to the 9 battalions of other Allied divisions, making them up to twice the size.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the relative size of U.S. divisions compared to other Allied divisions at the start of the offensive?: U.S. divisions of the AEF were oversized, containing 12 battalions per division compared to the French-British-German nine battalions per division, making them up to twice the size of other Allies' battle-depleted divisions upon arrival.

What was the general condition of German divisions opposing the Allied forces during the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: They had only 50 percent or less of their initial strength, with varied morale.

German divisions opposing the Allies were significantly depleted, operating at 50 percent or less of their initial strength, and exhibited varied morale depending on their origin.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the condition and morale of the German divisions opposing the Allied forces?: German divisions during this period had only 50 percent or less of their initial strength. Morale varied, with divisions from the Eastern front having high morale, while those from the Western front had poor morale.

Phase I: Initial Assault and Early Challenges (Sept 26 - Oct 3)

The initial artillery barrage on September 26 cost an estimated $1 million per minute, equivalent to approximately $3.5 billion in 2022 dollars.

Answer: True

The initial artillery barrage on September 26 was indeed estimated to cost $1 million per minute, or approximately $3.5 billion in 2022 dollars.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Allies initiate the assault on September 26, and what was the cost of this preparation?: The Allies prepared for the assault on September 26 at 02:30 with one of the most expensive and stunning artillery barrages, using 2,711 artillery guns to destroy obstacles like barbed wire. This barrage expended more ammunition than both sides fired during the entire American Civil War, costing an estimated $180 million, or $1 million per minute (approximately $3.5 billion in 2022 dollars).

Captain Harry S. Truman, a future U.S. president, led an infantry company during the initial barrage.

Answer: False

Captain Harry S. Truman led one of the artillery groups during the initial barrage, not an infantry company.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was a notable future U.S. president involved in the initial artillery barrage?: Captain Harry S. Truman, a future U.S. president, led one of the artillery groups during the initial barrage.

On September 26, the American V and III Corps failed to meet their objectives, while the 79th Division successfully captured Montfaucon.

Answer: False

On September 26, the V and III Corps largely met their objectives, but the 79th Division *failed* to capture Montfaucon on that day, only doing so on September 27.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant gains were made by American divisions on September 27?: On September 27, the 79th Division finally captured Montfaucon, and the 35th 'Santa Fe' Division captured the village of Baulny, Hill 218, and Charpentry, positioning itself ahead of adjacent units.
  • What were the initial results of the American attack on September 26?: The American attack on September 26, which began at 05:30, yielded mixed results. While the V and III Corps largely met their objectives, the 79th Division failed to capture Montfaucon, the 28th 'Keystone' Division's attack stalled due to strong German resistance, and the 91st 'Wild West' Division was forced to evacuate Épinonville despite advancing 8 km (5.0 mi). The inexperienced 37th 'Buckeye' Division also failed to capture Montfaucon d'Argonne.

The 35th 'Santa Fe' Division captured the village of Baulny and Hill 218 on September 27.

Answer: True

On September 27, the 35th 'Santa Fe' Division successfully captured the village of Baulny and Hill 218, among other locations.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant gains were made by American divisions on September 27?: On September 27, the 79th Division finally captured Montfaucon, and the 35th 'Santa Fe' Division captured the village of Baulny, Hill 218, and Charpentry, positioning itself ahead of adjacent units.

A German counterattack on September 29 against the 35th Division was successfully repelled by French forces.

Answer: False

The German counterattack on September 29 was repelled by elements of the 35th Division itself, including the 110th Engineers, 128th Machine Gun Battalion, and Harry Truman's Battery D.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the German forces counterattack on September 29, and which American units were involved in repelling it?: On September 29, six additional German divisions, including the 5th Guards and 52nd Division, were deployed to counterattack the 35th Division, which was low on food and ammunition. The Germans initially made significant gains but were repulsed by the 35th Division's 110th Engineers, 128th Machine Gun Battalion, and Harry Truman's Battery D, 129th Field Artillery.

General Pershing's decision to halt the American attack on October 1 was widely praised by Allied Generals for its strategic foresight.

Answer: False

General Pershing's decision to halt the attack on October 1 was unpopular among Allied Generals and nearly cost him his command.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did General Pershing order a halt to the American attack on October 1, and what was the reaction to this decision?: Pershing ordered a halt to the attack on October 1 to regroup and reinforce the American lines due to struggles with progress and logistics. This decision was unpopular among Allied Generals and nearly cost Pershing his command, but he was ultimately allowed to continue leading the offensive, which resumed on October 4.

What was the approximate cost of the initial artillery barrage on September 26, 1918, per minute?

Answer: $1 million

The initial artillery barrage on September 26, 1918, was estimated to cost $1 million per minute.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Allies initiate the assault on September 26, and what was the cost of this preparation?: The Allies prepared for the assault on September 26 at 02:30 with one of the most expensive and stunning artillery barrages, using 2,711 artillery guns to destroy obstacles like barbed wire. This barrage expended more ammunition than both sides fired during the entire American Civil War, costing an estimated $180 million, or $1 million per minute (approximately $3.5 billion in 2022 dollars).

Who was a notable future U.S. president involved in leading one of the artillery groups during the initial barrage on September 26?

Answer: Harry S. Truman

Captain Harry S. Truman, who later became a U.S. president, led one of the artillery groups during the initial barrage.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was a notable future U.S. president involved in the initial artillery barrage?: Captain Harry S. Truman, a future U.S. president, led one of the artillery groups during the initial barrage.

Which American division failed to capture Montfaucon on the initial day of the attack, September 26?

Answer: The 79th Division

On September 26, the 79th Division failed to capture Montfaucon, though it succeeded the following day.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the initial results of the American attack on September 26?: The American attack on September 26, which began at 05:30, yielded mixed results. While the V and III Corps largely met their objectives, the 79th Division failed to capture Montfaucon, the 28th 'Keystone' Division's attack stalled due to strong German resistance, and the 91st 'Wild West' Division was forced to evacuate Épinonville despite advancing 8 km (5.0 mi). The inexperienced 37th 'Buckeye' Division also failed to capture Montfaucon d'Argonne.

What significant village and hill did the 35th 'Santa Fe' Division capture on September 27?

Answer: Baulny and Hill 218

On September 27, the 35th 'Santa Fe' Division captured the village of Baulny and Hill 218, along with Charpentry.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant gains were made by American divisions on September 27?: On September 27, the 79th Division finally captured Montfaucon, and the 35th 'Santa Fe' Division captured the village of Baulny, Hill 218, and Charpentry, positioning itself ahead of adjacent units.

Which American units were instrumental in repelling the German counterattack against the 35th Division on September 29?

Answer: The 110th Engineers, 128th Machine Gun Battalion, and Harry Truman's Battery D.

The 35th Division's 110th Engineers, 128th Machine Gun Battalion, and Harry Truman's Battery D were crucial in repelling the German counterattack on September 29.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the German forces counterattack on September 29, and which American units were involved in repelling it?: On September 29, six additional German divisions, including the 5th Guards and 52nd Division, were deployed to counterattack the 35th Division, which was low on food and ammunition. The Germans initially made significant gains but were repulsed by the 35th Division's 110th Engineers, 128th Machine Gun Battalion, and Harry Truman's Battery D, 129th Field Artillery.

Why did General Pershing order a halt to the American attack on October 1?

Answer: To regroup and reinforce the American lines due to struggles with progress and logistics.

General Pershing halted the attack on October 1 to address significant challenges with progress and logistics, allowing for regrouping and reinforcement.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did General Pershing order a halt to the American attack on October 1, and what was the reaction to this decision?: Pershing ordered a halt to the attack on October 1 to regroup and reinforce the American lines due to struggles with progress and logistics. This decision was unpopular among Allied Generals and nearly cost Pershing his command, but he was ultimately allowed to continue leading the offensive, which resumed on October 4.

Phase II: Reorganization and Breakthroughs (Oct 4 - Oct 31)

The 'Lost Battalion' affair was resolved by an attack launched by the 28th and 82nd Divisions on October 7.

Answer: True

The 'Lost Battalion' was indeed rescued by an attack launched by the 28th and 82nd Divisions on October 7.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Lost Battalion' affair, and how was it resolved?: The 'Lost Battalion' affair occurred during the second phase of the offensive. The battalion was eventually rescued by an attack launched by the 28th and 82nd Divisions on October 7.

General Pershing reorganized the AEF and First Army on October 12 by consolidating them into a single, larger command.

Answer: False

Pershing reorganized the AEF and First Army by dividing the First Army into two smaller armies and replacing senior officers, not by consolidating them into a single larger command.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did Pershing reorganize the AEF and First Army on October 12, and what changes were made?: Pershing reorganized the AEF and First Army on October 12 due to the many struggles in the second phase, including disasters like the 'Lost Battalion,' which reflected poorly on his leadership. He divided the First Army into two smaller armies, with Hunter Liggett leading the First Army and Robert Bullard leading the newly formed Second Army. Pershing also replaced many of the AEF's senior officers, believing they lacked the necessary aggression.

The capture of Côte de Châtillon by the Rainbow Division under Brigadier General Douglas MacArthur was considered a decisive turning point in breaking the German defenses.

Answer: True

The capture of Côte de Châtillon by the Rainbow Division under Brigadier General Douglas MacArthur was indeed considered a decisive turning point in breaking the German defenses.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the American frontal assaults between October 14–17, and which battle was decisive?: Between October 14–17, the Americans launched a series of costly frontal assaults that finally broke through the main German defenses, specifically the Krimhilde Stellung of the Hindenburg Line, during the Battle of Montfaucon. The capture of Côte de Châtillon by the Rainbow Division (42nd Division) under Brigadier General Douglas MacArthur, after his soldiers discovered a gap in German defenses, was considered the decisive turning point.

Corporal Alvin York was famous for capturing 132 German prisoners near Cornay on October 8.

Answer: True

Corporal Alvin York is renowned for capturing 132 German prisoners near Cornay on October 8 during the offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Corporal Alvin York, and what famous act did he perform during the offensive?: Corporal (later Sergeant) Alvin York was an American soldier who, on October 8, made his famous capture of 132 German prisoners near Cornay.

By October 31, American forces had advanced 30 kilometers and reached the Aisne River.

Answer: False

By October 31, American forces had advanced 15 kilometers and cleared the Argonne Forest, while French forces on their left reached the Aisne River.

Related Concepts:

  • By October 31, what was the extent of the American and French advances in the third phase?: By October 31, the American forces had advanced 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) and cleared the Argonne Forest, while the French forces on their left had advanced 30 kilometers (19 miles), reaching the Aisne River.

Which divisions replaced the initial assault divisions at the start of the second phase of the offensive on October 4?

Answer: 32nd, 3rd, and 1st Divisions

The 32nd, 3rd, and 1st Divisions replaced the initial assault divisions at the commencement of the second phase on October 4.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the second phase of the offensive begin, and which American divisions led the assault?: The second phase began on October 4, with the 32nd, 3rd, and 1st Divisions replacing the initial assault divisions (91st, 79th, 37th, and 35th).

What was the 'Lost Battalion' affair, and which divisions ultimately rescued it?

Answer: An American battalion that was cut off and later rescued by the 28th and 82nd Divisions.

The 'Lost Battalion' refers to an American battalion that became isolated during the offensive and was subsequently rescued by an attack from the 28th and 82nd Divisions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Lost Battalion' affair, and how was it resolved?: The 'Lost Battalion' affair occurred during the second phase of the offensive. The battalion was eventually rescued by an attack launched by the 28th and 82nd Divisions on October 7.

What was a key change made by General Pershing during the reorganization of the AEF and First Army on October 12?

Answer: He replaced many senior officers, believing they lacked aggression.

During the October 12 reorganization, General Pershing replaced numerous senior officers, citing a perceived lack of aggression.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did Pershing reorganize the AEF and First Army on October 12, and what changes were made?: Pershing reorganized the AEF and First Army on October 12 due to the many struggles in the second phase, including disasters like the 'Lost Battalion,' which reflected poorly on his leadership. He divided the First Army into two smaller armies, with Hunter Liggett leading the First Army and Robert Bullard leading the newly formed Second Army. Pershing also replaced many of the AEF's senior officers, believing they lacked the necessary aggression.

Which battle was considered the decisive turning point in breaking through the main German defenses (Krimhilde Stellung of the Hindenburg Line) between October 14–17?

Answer: The Battle of Montfaucon

The Battle of Montfaucon, specifically the capture of Côte de Châtillon, was considered the decisive turning point in breaching the Krimhilde Stellung of the Hindenburg Line.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the American frontal assaults between October 14–17, and which battle was decisive?: Between October 14–17, the Americans launched a series of costly frontal assaults that finally broke through the main German defenses, specifically the Krimhilde Stellung of the Hindenburg Line, during the Battle of Montfaucon. The capture of Côte de Châtillon by the Rainbow Division (42nd Division) under Brigadier General Douglas MacArthur, after his soldiers discovered a gap in German defenses, was considered the decisive turning point.

Who commanded the Rainbow Division (42nd Division) during the capture of Côte de Châtillon, a decisive turning point?

Answer: Douglas MacArthur

Brigadier General Douglas MacArthur commanded the Rainbow Division (42nd Division) during the pivotal capture of Côte de Châtillon.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the American frontal assaults between October 14–17, and which battle was decisive?: Between October 14–17, the Americans launched a series of costly frontal assaults that finally broke through the main German defenses, specifically the Krimhilde Stellung of the Hindenburg Line, during the Battle of Montfaucon. The capture of Côte de Châtillon by the Rainbow Division (42nd Division) under Brigadier General Douglas MacArthur, after his soldiers discovered a gap in German defenses, was considered the decisive turning point.

What famous act did Corporal Alvin York perform on October 8?

Answer: He captured 132 German prisoners near Cornay.

Corporal Alvin York achieved fame on October 8 by capturing 132 German prisoners near Cornay.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Corporal Alvin York, and what famous act did he perform during the offensive?: Corporal (later Sergeant) Alvin York was an American soldier who, on October 8, made his famous capture of 132 German prisoners near Cornay.

Why did General Liggett allow the First Army to reorganize from October 27 to November 1?

Answer: To train fresh troops, build roads, and ensure sufficient manpower after high casualties.

General Liggett authorized the reorganization to address high casualties, train new troops, and develop infrastructure, ensuring the First Army's continued operational effectiveness.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did General Liggett allow the First Army to reorganize from October 27 to November 1?: Liggett allowed the First Army to reorganize due to the high number of casualties (over 9,000 men lost and over 100,000 injured) and the need to train fresh troops and build roads and light rails. This reorganization aimed to ensure the army had sufficient manpower and resources to maintain its advantage over the Germans.

By October 31, how far had American forces advanced and what natural feature had they cleared?

Answer: 15 kilometers, clearing the Argonne Forest.

By October 31, American forces had advanced 15 kilometers and successfully cleared the Argonne Forest.

Related Concepts:

  • By October 31, what was the extent of the American and French advances in the third phase?: By October 31, the American forces had advanced 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) and cleared the Argonne Forest, while the French forces on their left had advanced 30 kilometers (19 miles), reaching the Aisne River.

Phase III: Final Advance and Conclusion (Nov 1 - Nov 11)

In the third phase, the First Army, led by General Liggett, was directed eastward toward Metz.

Answer: False

In the third phase, the First Army, led by General Liggett, moved towards the Carignan-Sedan-Mezieres Railroad, while the *Second* Army, led by Lieutenant General Robert L. Bullard, was directed eastward toward Metz.

Related Concepts:

  • How were the American forces structured and directed in the third phase of the offensive?: In the third phase, American forces were reorganized into two armies: the First Army, led by General Liggett, moved towards the Carignan-Sedan-Mezieres Railroad, and the Second Army, led by Lieutenant General Robert L. Bullard, was directed eastward toward Metz.

American troops captured German defenses at Buzancy, which allowed British troops to cross the River Aisne.

Answer: False

American troops captured German defenses at Buzancy, which allowed *French* troops, not British, to cross the River Aisne.

Related Concepts:

  • What American action enabled French troops to cross the River Aisne?: American troops captured German defenses at Buzancy, which allowed French troops to cross the River Aisne.

The French forces conquered Sedan and its critical railroad hub on November 6, their immediate objective in the final days.

Answer: True

French forces successfully conquered Sedan and its critical railroad hub on November 6, achieving their immediate objective.

Related Concepts:

  • What immediate objective did the French forces achieve in the final days of the offensive?: In the final days, the French forces conquered their immediate objective, Sedan and its critical railroad hub, on November 6.

In the third phase of the offensive, which general led the newly formed Second Army, directed eastward toward Metz?

Answer: Robert L. Bullard

Lieutenant General Robert L. Bullard commanded the newly formed Second Army, which was directed eastward toward Metz during the third phase of the offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • How were the American forces structured and directed in the third phase of the offensive?: In the third phase, American forces were reorganized into two armies: the First Army, led by General Liggett, moved towards the Carignan-Sedan-Mezieres Railroad, and the Second Army, led by Lieutenant General Robert L. Bullard, was directed eastward toward Metz.

What American action directly enabled French troops to cross the River Aisne?

Answer: The capture of German defenses at Buzancy.

The capture of German defenses at Buzancy by American troops directly facilitated the French forces' ability to cross the River Aisne.

Related Concepts:

  • What American action enabled French troops to cross the River Aisne?: American troops captured German defenses at Buzancy, which allowed French troops to cross the River Aisne.

What immediate objective did French forces conquer on November 6 in the final days of the offensive?

Answer: Sedan and its critical railroad hub

On November 6, French forces successfully captured Sedan and its vital railroad hub, achieving a key objective in the offensive's final stages.

Related Concepts:

  • What immediate objective did the French forces achieve in the final days of the offensive?: In the final days, the French forces conquered their immediate objective, Sedan and its critical railroad hub, on November 6.

Logistics, Equipment, and Tactical Details

American forces contributed 380 tanks and 840 planes to the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Answer: True

American forces were supported by 380 tanks and 840 planes during the offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • How many American personnel participated in the Meuse–Argonne offensive, and what equipment did they have?: The American forces comprised 1,200,000 personnel, supported by 380 tanks, 840 planes, and 2,780 artillery pieces.

Colonel George C. Marshall was a German officer who planned the logistical prelude to the Meuse attack.

Answer: False

Colonel George C. Marshall was an American officer who planned the logistical prelude to the Meuse attack, not a German officer.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Colonel George C. Marshall, and what was his role in the Meuse attack?: Colonel George C. Marshall was an American officer who planned the logistical prelude to the Meuse attack, successfully moving American units to the front after the Battle of Saint-Mihiel.

The Allies provided 2,780 artillery pieces, 380 tanks, and 840 planes for the Meuse–Argonne front, primarily from the French Army.

Answer: True

The Allies provided 2,780 artillery pieces, 380 tanks, and 840 planes for the Meuse–Argonne front, with the French Army being the primary contributor.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific heavy equipment was provided by the Allies for the Meuse–Argonne front?: For the Meuse–Argonne front alone, the Allies provided 2,780 artillery pieces, 380 tanks, and 840 planes, primarily from the French Army.

How many tanks did American forces contribute to the Meuse–Argonne offensive?

Answer: 380

American forces contributed 380 tanks to the Meuse–Argonne offensive.

Related Concepts:

  • How many American personnel participated in the Meuse–Argonne offensive, and what equipment did they have?: The American forces comprised 1,200,000 personnel, supported by 380 tanks, 840 planes, and 2,780 artillery pieces.

What was Colonel George C. Marshall's role in the Meuse attack?

Answer: He planned the logistical prelude to the Meuse attack.

Colonel George C. Marshall was responsible for planning the logistical prelude to the Meuse attack, ensuring the successful movement of American units.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Colonel George C. Marshall, and what was his role in the Meuse attack?: Colonel George C. Marshall was an American officer who planned the logistical prelude to the Meuse attack, successfully moving American units to the front after the Battle of Saint-Mihiel.

What type of armored support did the 35th Division receive during the offensive?

Answer: Support from the 1st Tank Brigade, including American-crewed Renault FT and French-crewed Schneider tanks.

The 35th Division received armored support from the 1st Tank Brigade, which included both American-crewed Renault FT light tanks and French-crewed Schneider medium tanks.

Related Concepts:

  • How was armored support distributed among American divisions, including the 35th, 37th, 79th, and 91st Divisions, and the V Corps?: The 35th Division received support from the 1st Tank Brigade, which included 127 American-crewed Renault FT light tanks and 28 French-crewed Schneider medium tanks. The 3rd US Tank brigade, with 250 French-crewed tanks, supported the V Corps. The 37th and 79th Divisions were augmented with a French tank regiment (Renault FT light tank) and two groups of medium tanks (St-Chamond), and the 91st Division received an equivalent force.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy