Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
Middle Indo-Aryan languages represent the earliest stage of the Indo-Aryan language family.
Answer: False
Middle Indo-Aryan languages represent a transitional stage that evolved from Old Indo-Aryan and preceded the modern Indo-Aryan languages; they do not represent the earliest stage.
The chronological span for the Middle Indo-Aryan linguistic stage is generally considered to be from 600 BCE to 1000 CE.
Answer: True
The Middle Indo-Aryan linguistic stage is generally dated from approximately 600 BCE to 1000 CE, encompassing its early, middle, and late phases.
The term 'Prakrit' literally means 'constructed' or 'refined' in contrast to Sanskrit.
Answer: False
The term 'Prakrit' literally means 'natural' or 'ordinary,' in contrast to Sanskrit, which means 'constructed' or 'refined.' This reflects the historical view of Prakrits as vernacular developments.
Middle Indo-Aryan languages were primarily spoken in Southern India.
Answer: False
Middle Indo-Aryan languages were primarily spoken in Northern India, not Southern India.
Middle Indo-Aryan languages form a branch of the Germanic language family.
Answer: False
Middle Indo-Aryan languages belong to the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Iranian language family, not the Germanic language family.
The Glottolog code midd1350 specifically identifies the Old Indo-Aryan language group.
Answer: False
The Glottolog code 'midd1350' is a specific identifier for the Middle Indo-Aryan language group, not Old Indo-Aryan.
Michael C. Shapiro classifies all Middle Indo-Aryan languages under the broad term 'Prakrits'.
Answer: True
Michael C. Shapiro, along with some other scholars, classifies all Middle Indo-Aryan languages under the broad term 'Prakrits'.
The Middle Indo-Aryan period is commonly divided into two major subdivisions.
Answer: False
The Middle Indo-Aryan period is commonly divided into three major subdivisions: early, middle, and late stages, not two.
The term 'Prakrit' is sometimes used broadly by modern scholars to encompass all Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
Answer: True
Modern scholars sometimes employ the term 'Prakrit' broadly to refer to all Middle Indo-Aryan languages, reflecting their vernacular status.
Which linguistic stage evolved from Old Indo-Aryan and preceded the modern Indo-Aryan languages?
Answer: Middle Indo-Aryan
Middle Indo-Aryan languages represent the linguistic stage that evolved from Old Indo-Aryan and served as the direct predecessors to the modern Indo-Aryan languages.
What is the generally accepted chronological span for the Middle Indo-Aryan (MIA) linguistic stage?
Answer: 600 BCE - 1000 CE
The Middle Indo-Aryan stage is generally considered to have spanned from approximately 600 BCE to 1000 CE.
What is the literal meaning of the term 'Prakrit', and how does it contrast with Sanskrit?
Answer: 'Natural'; contrasts with 'constructed' Sanskrit.
The term 'Prakrit' literally means 'natural' or 'ordinary,' contrasting with Sanskrit, which means 'constructed' or 'refined.' This reflects their historical relationship as vernacular versus literary languages.
What geographical area is most commonly associated with the Middle Indo-Aryan languages?
Answer: Northern India
Middle Indo-Aryan languages were primarily spoken and developed in Northern India.
What is the significance of the Glottolog code midd1350?
Answer: It is a specific identifier for the Middle Indo-Aryan language group.
The Glottolog code 'midd1350' serves as a specific identifier for the Middle Indo-Aryan language group within linguistic databases.
Pali and Ardhamagadhi are examples of languages from the middle stage of Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
Pali and Ardhamagadhi are representative languages of the early stage of Middle Indo-Aryan, not the middle stage.
Shauraseni, Maharashtri, and Magadhi are characteristic languages of the middle phase of Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
Shauraseni, Maharashtri, and Magadhi Prakrits are indeed characteristic languages of the middle phase of Middle Indo-Aryan, typically dated between 200 BCE and 700 CE.
Apabhramshas represent the early stage of Middle Indo-Aryan development.
Answer: False
Apabhramshas represent the late stage of Middle Indo-Aryan development, emerging around the 6th century CE.
Abahatta is considered a form of Magadhi Apabhramsa from the late Middle Indo-Aryan period.
Answer: True
Abahatta is identified as Magadhi Apabhramsa, a linguistic form characteristic of the late stage of Middle Indo-Aryan.
The 'Dramatic Prakrits' were used in ancient Indian drama, with Magadhi, Maharashtri, and Shauraseni being key examples.
Answer: True
The 'Dramatic Prakrits,' including Magadhi, Maharashtri, and Shauraseni, were indeed utilized in ancient Indian drama.
The middle phase of Middle Indo-Aryan is dated approximately between 200 BCE and 700 CE.
Answer: True
The middle phase of Middle Indo-Aryan is indeed dated approximately between 200 BCE and 700 CE.
The late stage of Middle Indo-Aryan is represented by Apabhramshas, which emerged around the 6th century CE.
Answer: True
Apabhramshas represent the late stage of Middle Indo-Aryan, with their emergence typically dated around the 6th century CE.
Which of the following is NOT a common subdivision of the Middle Indo-Aryan period?
Answer: Archaic stage
The Middle Indo-Aryan period is commonly divided into three stages: early, middle, and late. 'Archaic stage' is not a standard subdivision.
Which languages are representative of the EARLY stage of Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: Pali, Ardhamagadhi, and Edicts of Ashoka inscriptions
Pali, Ardhamagadhi, and the language of the Edicts of Ashoka are key examples representing the early stage of Middle Indo-Aryan.
Which Prakrits characterize the MIDDLE phase (c. 200 BCE - 700 CE) of Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: Shauraseni, Maharashtri, and Magadhi
Shauraseni, Maharashtri, and Magadhi Prakrits are the characteristic languages of the middle phase of Middle Indo-Aryan.
What linguistic form represents the LATE stage of Middle Indo-Aryan, emerging around the 6th century CE?
Answer: Apabhramshas
Apabhramshas represent the late stage of Middle Indo-Aryan, emerging around the 6th century CE and preceding the early Modern Indo-Aryan languages.
Vocalic liquids like ṛ and ḷ were preserved as distinct sounds in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
Vocalic liquids such as ṛ and ḷ from Old Indo-Aryan were typically replaced by vowels (a, i, u) in Middle Indo-Aryan, rather than being preserved as distinct sounds.
The three distinct sibilant sounds of Old Indo-Aryan were retained in most Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
Answer: False
Most Middle Indo-Aryan languages reduced the three distinct sibilant sounds of Old Indo-Aryan to a single sibilant sound.
Intervocalic aspirated stops in Old Indo-Aryan generally became spirantized in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
A characteristic phonological change from Old Indo-Aryan to Middle Indo-Aryan was the spirantization of intervocalic aspirated stops.
Old Indo-Aryan diphthongs 'ai' and 'au' typically became the monophthongs 'e' and 'o' in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
A significant phonological change in Middle Indo-Aryan was the monophthongization of Old Indo-Aryan diphthongs, where 'ai' typically became 'e' and 'au' became 'o'.
Long vowels in Middle Indo-Aryan languages generally remained long, especially in closed syllables.
Answer: False
Long vowels in Middle Indo-Aryan languages tended to become short, particularly in 'overweight' syllables and later in pre-tonic and post-tonic heavy syllables, rather than remaining long.
The weakening and deletion of intervocalic stops is a characteristic change from Old Indo-Aryan to Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
The weakening and deletion of intervocalic stops are indeed characteristic phonological changes observed in the transition from Old Indo-Aryan to Middle Indo-Aryan.
The monophthongization of OIA diphthongs is a defining characteristic of Middle Indo-Aryan phonology.
Answer: True
The monophthongization of Old Indo-Aryan diphthongs (e.g., 'ai' to 'e', 'au' to 'o') is a key phonological characteristic of Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
The reduction of three OIA sibilants to one is a key phonological change in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
The reduction of the three distinct sibilant sounds found in Old Indo-Aryan to a single sibilant is a significant phonological development in Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
Which phonological change involved the simplification of Old Indo-Aryan diphthongs in Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: Monophthongization of 'ai' to 'e' and 'au' to 'o'
The simplification of Old Indo-Aryan diphthongs 'ai' and 'au' into the monophthongs 'e' and 'o' respectively is a key phonological change in Middle Indo-Aryan.
How did the three distinct sibilant sounds (s, ś, ṣ) of Old Indo-Aryan change in Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: They merged into a single sibilant sound.
In most Middle Indo-Aryan languages, the three distinct sibilant sounds of Old Indo-Aryan merged into a single sibilant sound.
What typically happened to intervocalic aspirated stops from Old Indo-Aryan in Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: They became spirantized.
Intervocalic aspirated stops from Old Indo-Aryan generally underwent spirantization in Middle Indo-Aryan.
What was the fate of most final consonants in the transition from Old Indo-Aryan to Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: They were mostly deleted, with some exceptions.
Most final consonants were deleted in Middle Indo-Aryan languages, though some exceptions, like the preservation of final 'm', did occur.
Which of the following is a key phonological change differentiating Middle Indo-Aryan from Old Indo-Aryan?
Answer: Weakening or deletion of most final consonants.
The weakening or deletion of most final consonants is a key phonological change that distinguishes Middle Indo-Aryan from Old Indo-Aryan. Other options represent morphological or phonological changes but are not the primary differentiator in this context, or are incorrect (e.g., preservation of sibilants).
All final consonants were retained in Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
Answer: False
Most final consonants were deleted in Middle Indo-Aryan languages, although some exceptions existed, such as the final 'm' sound.
The dual number grammatical category was maintained in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
The dual number grammatical category, present in Old Indo-Aryan, was lost in Middle Indo-Aryan languages, simplifying the number system to singular and plural.
The genitive case completely replaced the dative case in Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
Answer: False
The dative case was eliminated in Middle Indo-Aryan languages, and its functions were largely assumed by the genitive case, but it did not completely replace it in all contexts.
The middle voice grammatical mood disappeared during the Middle Indo-Aryan period.
Answer: True
The middle voice, a grammatical mood present in Old Indo-Aryan, eventually disappeared during the Middle Indo-Aryan period.
Serial verb constructions were a significant syntactic innovation of Old Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
Serial verb constructions were a significant syntactic innovation that emerged during the Middle Indo-Aryan period, not Old Indo-Aryan.
The loss of the dual number simplified the number system in Middle Indo-Aryan to only plural forms.
Answer: False
The loss of the dual number simplified the number system to singular and plural forms, not solely plural forms.
The dative case was eliminated in Middle Indo-Aryan, and its functions were assumed by the instrumental case.
Answer: False
The dative case was eliminated in Middle Indo-Aryan, but its functions were primarily assumed by the genitive case, not the instrumental case.
The passive voice, not the middle voice, eventually disappeared during the Middle Indo-Aryan period.
Answer: False
The middle voice, not the passive voice, eventually disappeared during the Middle Indo-Aryan period. The passive voice underwent changes but did not disappear.
The Old Indo-Aryan pronouns 'mahyam' and 'tuvyam' evolved to primarily indicate the instrumental case in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
The Old Indo-Aryan pronouns 'mahyam' and 'tuvyam' evolved into forms primarily used for the genitive case in Middle Indo-Aryan. New forms emerged for the instrumental case.
In Middle Indo-Aryan, 'i-' and 'u-' stem declensions merged with 'ī-' and 'ū-' stem declensions.
Answer: True
In Middle Indo-Aryan, the declensions based on short 'i-' and 'u-' stems merged with those based on long 'ī-' and 'ū-' stems, leading to a unified pattern.
The genitive case in Middle Indo-Aryan languages primarily indicated possession, similar to Old Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
While the genitive case still indicated possession, its role expanded significantly in Middle Indo-Aryan to absorb many functions previously held by the eliminated dative case.
The use of case endings for verbal paradigms became more standardized in Middle Indo-Aryan compared to Old Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
The use of case endings for verbal paradigms became less standardized and more flexible in Middle Indo-Aryan compared to the more systematic usage in Old Indo-Aryan.
The development of light verbs is linked to serial verb constructions in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
The grammaticalization of light verbs in later North Indian languages is closely linked to the development of serial verb constructions in Middle Indo-Aryan.
The dual number was lost, and consonantal stems were thematicized in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
Middle Indo-Aryan languages saw the loss of the dual number and the thematicization of consonantal stems, altering the grammatical structure inherited from Old Indo-Aryan.
The dative case was eliminated and its functions were absorbed by the genitive case in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: True
The dative case was indeed eliminated in Middle Indo-Aryan languages, with its grammatical functions largely absorbed by the genitive case.
Active verb endings began to replace original passive endings during the Middle Indo-Aryan period.
Answer: True
During the Middle Indo-Aryan period, active verb endings began to replace the original passive endings, indicating a shift in verbal morphology.
The dual number was lost, but consonantal stems remained unchanged morphologically in Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
While the dual number was lost, consonantal stems were thematicized in Middle Indo-Aryan, meaning they were treated similarly to vowel stems, thus undergoing morphological change.
Which grammatical feature present in Old Indo-Aryan was lost in Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: The dual number
The dual number, a grammatical feature present in Old Indo-Aryan, was lost in Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
Which case was eliminated in Middle Indo-Aryan, and whose functions did it largely assume?
Answer: Dative, assumed by Genitive
The dative case was eliminated in Middle Indo-Aryan languages, and its grammatical functions were largely absorbed by the genitive case.
What happened to the middle voice during the Middle Indo-Aryan period?
Answer: It eventually disappeared.
The middle voice, a grammatical mood present in Old Indo-Aryan, eventually disappeared during the Middle Indo-Aryan period.
What significant syntactic innovation, influencing later languages like Hindi, emerged in Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: Emergence of serial verb constructions
The emergence of serial verb constructions was a significant syntactic innovation in Middle Indo-Aryan that influenced the development of later languages like Hindi.
The genitive case in Middle Indo-Aryan languages expanded its role to absorb functions previously held by which eliminated case?
Answer: Dative
The genitive case in Middle Indo-Aryan languages expanded its role to absorb functions previously held by the eliminated dative case.
How did the pronouns 'mahyam' and 'tuvyam' evolve in Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: They evolved into forms primarily used for the genitive case.
The Old Indo-Aryan pronouns 'mahyam' and 'tuvyam' evolved into forms primarily used for the genitive case in Middle Indo-Aryan, with new forms emerging for the instrumental case.
The grammaticalization of light verbs in later North Indian languages is linked to which Middle Indo-Aryan development?
Answer: The development of serial verb constructions
The grammaticalization of light verbs in later North Indian languages is closely linked to the development of serial verb constructions during the Middle Indo-Aryan period.
What change occurred to the declensions based on short 'i-' and 'u-' stems in Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: They merged with long 'ī-' and 'ū-' stems.
In Middle Indo-Aryan, declensions based on short 'i-' and 'u-' stems merged with those based on long 'ī-' and 'ū-' stems.
Pali is significant due to its association with early Buddhist literature and commentaries.
Answer: True
Pali holds significant importance as the language of the extensive early Buddhist canonical literature, including commentaries and doctrinal works.
The Edicts of Ashoka are primarily found in regions corresponding to modern Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Answer: False
While Ashoka's Edicts are found across the Indian subcontinent, inscriptions primarily associated with the language of the Edicts are found in regions like Bihar, not exclusively or primarily in modern Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Gandhari was a Middle Indo-Aryan language spoken in the region of Magadha.
Answer: False
Gandhari was a Middle Indo-Aryan language spoken in the ancient region of Gandhara, not Magadha.
Elu, or Hela Prakrit, is considered the ancestral language of modern Sinhalese.
Answer: True
Elu, also known as Hela Prakrit, is recognized as the ancestral language of modern Sinhalese and Dhivehi.
Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit is identical to Classical Sanskrit in its linguistic features.
Answer: False
Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit is distinct from Classical Sanskrit; it represents a form of Middle Indo-Aryan language used in later Buddhist texts.
Elu, or Hela Prakrit, was spoken in the ancient region of Gandhara.
Answer: False
Elu, or Hela Prakrit, was spoken in Sri Lanka, not the ancient region of Gandhara.
Pali is considered an early form of the Magadhi dialect.
Answer: False
Pali is a distinct Middle Indo-Aryan language, although it shares features with Magadhi and is often associated with the early stage of MIA. It is not considered simply an early form of the Magadhi dialect.
The Pali Text Society was founded to promote the study and publication of Pali literature.
Answer: True
The Pali Text Society was established with the specific aim of promoting the study and publication of texts written in the Pali language.
The Edicts of Ashoka are written in a late stage Middle Indo-Aryan language.
Answer: False
The Edicts of Ashoka are written in an early stage Middle Indo-Aryan language, typically Ardhamagadhi or related dialects, not a late stage.
The Jain Agamas are representative texts of the late stage of Middle Indo-Aryan.
Answer: False
The Jain Agamas are considered representative texts of the early stage of Middle Indo-Aryan, not the late stage.
Gandhari texts are predominantly secular in nature.
Answer: False
Gandhari texts are predominantly Buddhist in nature, not secular.
The language of which major religious tradition is extensively preserved in Pali?
Answer: Buddhism
Pali is extensively preserved as the language of the canonical literature of Buddhism.
The Edicts of Ashoka, dating to the 3rd century BCE, are primarily found in inscriptions written in an early form of which language?
Answer: Ardhamagadhi
The Edicts of Ashoka are primarily found in inscriptions written in an early form of Ardhamagadhi or related dialects.
Which Middle Indo-Aryan language was spoken in the ancient region of Gandhara and often written in the Kharosthi script?
Answer: Gandhari
Gandhari was a Middle Indo-Aryan language spoken in the ancient region of Gandhara and frequently written using the Kharosthi script.
Elu, also known as Hela Prakrit, is recognized as the ancestral language of which modern languages?
Answer: Sinhalese and Dhivehi
Elu, or Hela Prakrit, is considered the ancestral language of the modern Sinhalese and Dhivehi languages.
What is Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit?
Answer: A form of Middle Indo-Aryan language used in later Buddhist texts, distinct from Classical Sanskrit.
Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit refers to a form of Middle Indo-Aryan language found in later Buddhist texts, which is distinct from Classical Sanskrit.
Which of the following is an example of a 'Magadhism' found in early Pali texts?
Answer: The masculine nominative singular ending in '-e'
The masculine nominative singular ending in '-e' is cited as an example of a 'Magadhism' found in early Pali texts.
Middle Indo-Aryan languages are considered direct continuations of Vedic Sanskrit.
Answer: False
While related to Old Indo-Aryan, Middle Indo-Aryan languages are not considered direct continuations of Vedic Sanskrit but likely evolved from related, possibly more archaic, dialects.
Middle Indo-Aryan languages coexisted with Classical Sanskrit, which served as the primary vernacular.
Answer: False
Middle Indo-Aryan languages coexisted with Classical Sanskrit, but Sanskrit served primarily as a literary and scholarly language, while the MIA languages functioned as vernaculars.
Middle Indo-Aryan languages evolved from Old Indo-Aryan languages.
Answer: True
Middle Indo-Aryan languages represent a developmental stage that evolved directly from Old Indo-Aryan languages.
Which group of Indo-Aryan languages represents the stage that existed before Middle Indo-Aryan?
Answer: Old Indo-Aryan
Old Indo-Aryan languages, such as Vedic Sanskrit and Classical Sanskrit, represent the stage that existed before and gave rise to the Middle Indo-Aryan languages.
According to the source, how do Middle Indo-Aryan languages relate to Vedic Sanskrit?
Answer: They likely descend from related, possibly more archaic, dialects than Vedic Sanskrit.
Linguistic analysis suggests that Middle Indo-Aryan languages did not directly descend from Vedic Sanskrit but rather from related dialects that may have been more archaic.
Which statement best describes the relationship between Middle Indo-Aryan languages and Classical Sanskrit?
Answer: MIA languages coexisted with Classical Sanskrit, serving as vernaculars while Sanskrit was a literary language.
Middle Indo-Aryan languages coexisted with Classical Sanskrit; Sanskrit functioned as a literary language, while MIA languages served as the vernaculars.