Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 7
According to the provided text, the term 'militant' is characterized as a euphemism for an aggressive adherent to a cause, commonly employed by mass media.
Answer: True
The provided text defines 'militant' as a euphemism for an aggressive adherent to a cause, noting its frequent use by mass media.
A euphemism is defined as a word or expression used to soften harsh or blunt language.
Answer: True
The text provides this definition for a euphemism: a milder or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered too harsh or blunt.
An ideological faction is defined as a group that opposes all forms of organized belief systems.
Answer: False
An ideological faction is a subgroup within a larger movement that shares a specific set of beliefs or doctrines, not a group that opposes all belief systems.
The term 'militant' became widely adopted as a euphemism because it serves as the most accurate descriptor for aggressive actions.
Answer: False
The term 'militant' became widely used as a euphemism not because it is the most accurate descriptor, but because it serves to soften language and maintain media neutrality, potentially obscuring the nature of actions.
Being an 'adherent to a particular cause' implies that a militant passively supports a belief system.
Answer: False
An 'adherent to a particular cause' signifies active and dedicated support, not passive observation, for a specific belief system or objective.
The term 'entrenched' suggests that a militant's commitment is superficial and easily altered.
Answer: False
The term 'entrenched' implies a deep-seated, firm, and unwavering commitment to a cause, the opposite of being superficial or easily changed.
In the context of a militant, aggression refers to a forceful and active pursuit or defense of their cause.
Answer: True
Aggression, as applied to a militant, signifies a vigorous and active engagement in advancing or defending their cause.
The term 'militant' is considered a neutral descriptor devoid of specific connotations.
Answer: False
While often used to project neutrality, the term 'militant' is described as a euphemism carrying connotations of aggressive adherence to a cause, indicating it is not entirely neutral.
The phrase 'entrenched or aggressive adherent' implies that a militant is deeply committed and actively promotes their cause.
Answer: True
This phrase signifies a militant's deep commitment ('entrenched') and active, forceful promotion ('aggressive') of their cause.
At its core, the term 'militant' represents an individual who passively observes conflict.
Answer: False
The term 'militant' fundamentally represents an active and often aggressive adherent to a cause, not a passive observer.
Based on the provided material, what is the primary definition offered for the term 'militant'?
Answer: A euphemism for an aggressive adherent to a cause, frequently utilized by mass media.
The text explicitly defines 'militant' as a euphemism for an aggressive adherent to a cause, noting its common usage within mass media.
What does the term 'entrenched' imply regarding a militant's commitment?
Answer: Their commitment is deeply established and firm.
The term 'entrenched' signifies that a militant's commitment is deeply established, firm, and difficult to alter.
The definition of 'militant' as an 'aggressive adherent' implies:
Answer: A forceful and active promotion of a cause.
The term 'aggressive adherent' signifies a militant's active and forceful engagement in promoting or defending their cause.
The text suggests that the term 'militant' is often used as a euphemism because:
Answer: It replaces a harsher or more blunt term.
The term 'militant' functions as a euphemism because it serves as a substitute for language that might be considered harsher or more blunt.
The primary objective behind media policies such as those of CBC and Reuters is to employ emotive language to enhance audience engagement.
Answer: False
The overarching intention of these media policies is to use dispassionate language and allow the audience to form their own judgments, rather than employing emotive language for engagement.
Maintaining a neutral tone in reporting necessitates the presentation of information accompanied by strong personal opinions.
Answer: False
Maintaining a neutral tone involves presenting information objectively without personal opinions or biases, aiming to provide facts for the audience's own conclusions.
A 'loaded' term in journalism, such as 'terrorist,' carries significant emotional connotations and implies judgment.
Answer: True
The text explains that a 'loaded' term in journalism is one that carries substantial emotional weight or implies a judgment, making its use inherently subjective.
The terms 'terrorist' and 'terrorism' are considered controversial because their application is invariably objective and consistent.
Answer: False
These terms are controversial precisely because their application is often subjective and inconsistent, leading to difficulties in objective and fair reporting.
The intended outcome of employing dispassionate language is to impose media-driven interpretations upon the audience.
Answer: False
The intention of using dispassionate language is to present information objectively, allowing the audience to form their own judgments without the imposition of media-driven interpretations.
What is the primary reason mass media outlets commonly employ the term 'militant'?
Answer: To maintain a neutral tone and avoid appearing biased.
The text indicates that mass media outlets frequently use 'militant' as a euphemism to uphold a neutral stance and prevent the appearance of bias.
What is the overarching intention behind media policies like CBC's and Reuters' regarding terms such as 'terrorist'?
Answer: To allow individuals to form their own judgments without biased labels.
The overarching intention is to use dispassionate language that enables the audience to form their own judgments, free from potentially biased labels imposed by the media.
What defines a 'loaded' term in journalism, as exemplified by 'terrorist'?
Answer: A term that carries significant emotional connotations or implies judgment.
A 'loaded' term is characterized by its significant emotional connotations and its implication of judgment, rather than purely factual description.
What is the primary function of using euphemisms like 'militant' in mass media communication?
Answer: To maintain a neutral tone and avoid appearing biased.
The primary function cited for using euphemisms like 'militant' is to maintain neutrality and avoid conveying bias in reporting.
John Simpson posits that 'terrorist' is a less judgmental term than 'militant'.
Answer: False
John Simpson suggests the opposite: 'terrorist' is a loaded term implying moral disapproval, whereas 'militant' is often used by media as a more neutral, less judgmental alternative.
The BBC's foundational principles, as articulated by John Simpson, permit the organization to dictate to its audience whom they should support or condemn.
Answer: False
John Simpson states that the BBC's founding principles preclude it from telling its audience whom to support or condemn, emphasizing the importance of neutrality.
During World War II, the BBC referred to Nazis as 'evil' to convey the moral gravity of their actions.
Answer: False
The text indicates that during World War II, the BBC referred to Nazis as 'the enemy' rather than using the morally charged term 'evil,' as part of its commitment to neutral terminology.
The BBC maintained its neutral stance on terminology throughout The Troubles, despite facing considerable external pressure.
Answer: True
The source material confirms that the BBC faced significant pressure during The Troubles but upheld its policy of using neutral terminology.
John Simpson contends that the word 'terrorist' is employed to condemn actions without necessitating moral judgment.
Answer: False
Simpson argues that 'terrorist' is inherently a loaded term that implies moral condemnation, used precisely because it carries significant judgmental weight.
During The Troubles, the BBC modified its reporting terminology to accommodate public pressure.
Answer: False
The text states that the BBC maintained its neutral stance on terminology during The Troubles, resisting pressure to alter its language.
John Simpson's perspective on 'terrorist' as a loaded term explains the BBC's choice to use neutral language like 'enemy' during World War II.
Answer: True
Simpson's view that 'terrorist' is a judgmental term aligns with the BBC's practice of using neutral descriptors like 'enemy' during WWII to maintain impartiality.
John Simpson's commentary highlights the inherent tension between media neutrality and the inherently judgmental nature of certain terminology.
Answer: True
Simpson's analysis underscores the conflict between the journalistic ideal of neutrality and the reality that certain terms, like 'terrorist,' carry significant inherent judgment.
The BBC's policy during The Troubles involved employing emotionally charged language to reflect the conflict's intensity.
Answer: False
The BBC maintained its neutral stance on terminology during The Troubles, resisting the use of emotionally charged language.
The BBC's adherence to neutrality during The Troubles meant they reported events without any commentary whatsoever.
Answer: False
While maintaining neutrality in terminology, the BBC's reporting during The Troubles did not necessarily exclude all forms of commentary, but rather focused on avoiding judgmental labels.
John Simpson differentiates 'terrorist' and 'militant' by noting 'terrorist' implies condemnation while 'militant' implies neutrality.
Answer: True
Simpson's analysis posits that 'terrorist' carries inherent condemnation, whereas 'militant' is often employed by media as a more neutral descriptor.
According to John Simpson, what is the implication of employing the word 'terrorist'?
Answer: It implies moral disapproval of the actions being described.
John Simpson suggests that 'terrorist' is a loaded term carrying strong moral disapproval, used by those who wish to condemn specific actions.
How did the BBC refer to Nazis during World War II as an illustration of its neutral terminology policy?
Answer: As 'the enemy'.
The text provides 'the enemy' as the term the BBC used for Nazis during World War II, exemplifying its commitment to neutral terminology.
Despite facing pressure during The Troubles, what principle did the BBC uphold regarding its reporting?
Answer: It maintained its neutral stance on terminology.
The BBC maintained its neutral stance on terminology during The Troubles, demonstrating a commitment to its reporting principles even under significant pressure.
John Simpson's perspective on the word 'terrorist' helps explain the BBC's approach to reporting during which historical event?
Answer: World War II
Simpson's views on the term 'terrorist' are used to contextualize the BBC's reporting practices during World War II, specifically their use of neutral language.
John Simpson's commentary on 'terrorist' versus 'militant' highlights a conflict between:
Answer: Objectivity and the inherent judgment in language.
Simpson's commentary underscores the tension between the journalistic goal of objectivity and the inherently judgmental nature embedded within certain terms like 'terrorist'.
What does the BBC's historical approach during The Troubles demonstrate about its reporting principles?
Answer: A commitment to maintaining neutrality even under significant pressure.
The BBC's actions during The Troubles exemplify a commitment to maintaining neutrality in terminology, even when subjected to considerable external pressure.
CBC News has consistently employed the term 'terrorist' in its reporting for over three decades.
Answer: False
Esther Enkin of CBC News indicates that the organization has deliberately avoided using the term 'terrorist' for over thirty years.
CBC News refrains from using 'terrorist' under the belief that the media should dictate the interpretation of events to the audience.
Answer: False
The rationale provided for CBC News' avoidance of 'terrorist' is to empower the audience to form their own judgments, not to dictate interpretation.
Esther Enkin observes that most Western media outlets have also refrained from using the term 'terrorist' for many years.
Answer: True
Esther Enkin notes that CBC News' avoidance of the term 'terrorist' aligns with a broader trend observed among most Western media outlets over an extended period.
CBC's avoidance of 'terrorist' aims to ensure the audience relies exclusively on official government statements for interpretation.
Answer: False
CBC's policy of avoiding 'terrorist' is intended to empower the audience's independent judgment, not to direct them to rely solely on government interpretations.
Esther Enkin suggests that media outlets should utilize loaded terms to guide audience interpretation.
Answer: False
Enkin's perspective implies the opposite: media should avoid loaded terms to allow the audience to form their own judgments.
The CBC's language guide suggests that distinguishing terrorism from other violent acts is straightforward.
Answer: False
The CBC language guide highlights the difficulty in distinguishing terrorism from other violent incidents, indicating it is not a straightforward matter.
CBC News' avoidance of 'terrorist' signifies a long-standing editorial principle prioritizing audience judgment.
Answer: True
The extended period of CBC News avoiding the term 'terrorist' reflects a core editorial principle focused on empowering the audience's independent judgment.
What has been the policy of CBC News concerning the term 'terrorist' for over thirty years?
Answer: They have deliberately avoided using it.
According to Esther Enkin, CBC News has deliberately avoided using the term 'terrorist' for more than thirty years as part of its editorial policy.
According to Esther Enkin, why does CBC News exercise caution with terms like 'terrorist'?
Answer: To empower the viewer or listener to use their own judgment.
CBC News' caution with terms like 'terrorist' stems from a policy to empower the audience's independent judgment, rather than imposing labels.
What challenge does the CBC's language guide highlight regarding the application of the term 'terrorism'?
Answer: It is difficult to distinguish terrorism from other violent incidents.
The CBC's language guide points out the difficulty in distinguishing acts of terrorism from other violent incidents, indicating challenges in consistent application of the term.
What is the core reason behind CBC News' long-standing avoidance of the term 'terrorist'?
Answer: A policy to empower the audience's independent judgment.
CBC News' avoidance of 'terrorist' is rooted in a policy designed to empower the audience's independent judgment by refraining from using labels with strong connotations.
Reuters exclusively utilizes the term 'terrorist' within attributed quotations.
Answer: True
Reuters' policy dictates that the term 'terrorist' is used solely within attributed quotes, distinguishing it from the general use of 'terrorism' or 'counter-terrorism'.
Reuters permits the general use of 'terrorism' and 'counter-terrorism' but prohibits the specific label 'terrorist' for events.
Answer: True
Reuters allows the use of 'terrorism' and 'counter-terrorism' in general discussions but restricts the direct application of 'terrorist' to attributed quotes only.
Reuters' policy regarding 'terrorist' signifies a complete avoidance of discussing the concept of terrorism.
Answer: False
Reuters permits the general use of 'terrorism' and 'counter-terrorism,' only restricting the direct application of the label 'terrorist' to attributed quotes.
Reuters employs the term 'terrorist' in general reporting to ensure clarity regarding perpetrators.
Answer: False
Reuters restricts the use of 'terrorist' to attributed quotes, indicating it is not used in general reporting for clarity on perpetrators.
How does Reuters handle the use of the term 'terrorist' in its reporting?
Answer: It is used exclusively within attributed quotes.
Reuters employs a policy where the term 'terrorist' is utilized strictly within attributed quotes, distinguishing it from the general discussion of 'terrorism'.
What distinction does Reuters make regarding the use of 'terrorism' versus 'terrorist'?
Answer: 'Terrorism' is used in general discussion, 'terrorist' only in attributed quotes.
Reuters permits general use of 'terrorism' but restricts 'terrorist' to attributed quotes, differentiating the discussion of the phenomenon from the label applied to individuals.
Why might a media organization like Reuters choose to use 'terrorist' only within attributed quotes?
Answer: To distance the organization from the potentially biased label.
Using 'terrorist' solely within attributed quotes allows Reuters to distance itself from the potentially biased and judgmental nature of the label, attributing it to the source instead.
Mass media outlets utilize the term 'militant' primarily to unequivocally identify individuals as terrorists.
Answer: False
The text indicates that 'militant' is often used as a euphemism by mass media, suggesting it is not primarily employed to unequivocally label individuals as terrorists but rather to maintain neutrality or soften language.
Criticism regarding the media's application of the term 'militant' arises from concerns that it may obscure the nature of actions or preclude necessary judgments.
Answer: True
The text acknowledges criticism that the media's use of 'militant' as a euphemism can obscure the actual nature of certain actions or lead to an avoidance of making necessary judgments.
Criticism concerning the media's use of 'militant' suggests it may diminish the perceived severity of certain actions.
Answer: True
A key criticism is that employing 'militant' as a euphemism might downplay the severity or moral implications of the actions undertaken by the individuals or groups described.
The principal function of euphemisms like 'militant' is to soften controversial language for the sake of media neutrality.
Answer: True
The text identifies the primary function of such euphemisms as maintaining a neutral tone and avoiding bias in reporting sensitive subjects.
The primary motivation for media outlets using 'militant' is to ensure all parties involved feel accurately represented.
Answer: False
The primary motivation cited for using 'militant' is to maintain a neutral tone and avoid bias, rather than ensuring all parties feel accurately represented.
What is the basis for criticism regarding the media's utilization of the term 'militant'?
Answer: It can obscure the nature of actions or avoid necessary judgments.
Criticism stems from the concern that using 'militant' as a euphemism may obscure the true nature of certain actions or lead to an avoidance of making necessary judgments.
The criticism that using 'militant' might 'obscure the nature of actions' suggests that the term:
Answer: May downplay the severity or moral implications of certain acts.
The criticism implies that 'militant,' used as a euphemism, might inadvertently lessen the perceived severity or moral weight of the actions it describes.
Wiktionary is recommended for obtaining precise definitions of 'militant' and 'militance'.
Answer: True
The source material explicitly suggests consulting Wiktionary for precise definitions of the terms 'militant' and 'militance'.
Quotations pertaining to the term 'Militant' can be accessed on Wikipedia.
Answer: False
The text indicates that quotations related to 'Militant' are available on Wikiquote, not Wikipedia.
The Wikipedia article on 'Militant' includes sections for introduction, related terms, references, and external links.
Answer: True
The structure of the Wikipedia article on 'Militant' is described as including an introduction, a 'See also' section (for related terms), references, and external links.
The 'References' section within the Wikipedia article provides citations that substantiate the article's content.
Answer: True
The 'References' section of a Wikipedia article contains the citations used to support the information presented, allowing for verification and further research.
The 'External links' section directs readers to resources such as Wiktionary and Wikiquote for supplementary study.
Answer: True
The 'External links' section of the Wikipedia article provides direct links to related resources like Wiktionary and Wikiquote, facilitating deeper exploration of the topic.
External links to Wiktionary and Wikiquote enhance the article by providing definitions and related quotations.
Answer: True
The external links section directs users to Wiktionary for definitions and Wikiquote for quotations, thereby enriching the reader's understanding.
Where does the provided text suggest looking for precise definitions of 'militant' and 'militance'?
Answer: Wiktionary
The text specifically recommends consulting Wiktionary for precise definitions of 'militant' and 'militance'.
Which of the following is NOT listed as a section within the Wikipedia article on 'Militant'?
Answer: Glossary
The described sections of the Wikipedia article are Introduction, See also (related terms), References, and External Links. A 'Glossary' is not mentioned.
What is the purpose of the 'External links' section in the Wikipedia article on 'Militant'?
Answer: To direct readers to related resources outside of Wikipedia.
The 'External links' section serves to guide readers to relevant resources beyond Wikipedia, such as Wiktionary and Wikiquote.