Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


The National Academy of Engineering: History, Mission, and Impact

At a Glance

Title: The National Academy of Engineering: History, Mission, and Impact

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Historical Context and Formation of the National Academies: 11 flashcards, 22 questions
  • Organizational Structure, Governance, and Membership: 10 flashcards, 17 questions
  • Policy Advisory Role and Key Programs: 12 flashcards, 17 questions
  • Recognizing Engineering Achievements and Grand Challenges: 18 flashcards, 22 questions
  • NAE Awards and Honors: 4 flashcards, 6 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 55
  • True/False Questions: 42
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 42
  • Total Questions: 84

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The National Academy of Engineering: History, Mission, and Impact

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "National Academy of Engineering" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The National Academy of Engineering: History, Mission, and Impact

Study Guide: The National Academy of Engineering: History, Mission, and Impact

Historical Context and Formation of the National Academies

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the parent organization of NAE, was established in 1863 by an Act of Incorporation signed by President Abraham Lincoln.

Answer: True

The National Academy of Sciences was indeed established in 1863 by an Act of Incorporation signed by President Abraham Lincoln, serving as the foundational body for the later National Academies.

Related Concepts:

  • When and by whom was the National Academy of Sciences, the parent organization of NAE, originally established?: The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was established by an Act of Incorporation on March 3, 1863, signed by then-President of the United States Abraham Lincoln. Its initial purpose was to investigate, examine, experiment, and report on subjects of science or art for the government.

Engineering was first formally recognized within the National Academy of Sciences' committee structure in 1919 with the establishment of a dedicated engineering section.

Answer: False

Engineering was first formally recognized in 1899 with a 'physics and engineering' committee. A dedicated engineering section was established in 1919, but this was not the *first* formal recognition.

Related Concepts:

  • When was engineering first formally recognized within the National Academy of Sciences' committee structure?: Engineering was first recognized within the National Academy of Sciences' committee structure in 1899 with the establishment of standing committees, one of which was 'physics and engineering.' This marked an early acknowledgment of the field's importance within the scientific body.
  • When was the first dedicated engineering section established within the National Academy of Sciences, and who was its initial chairman?: The Academy established its first dedicated engineering section in 1919, with Civil War veteran Henry Larcom Abbot serving as its first chairman. This marked a significant step towards formal recognition of engineering as a distinct discipline within the scientific body.

George Ellery Hale's 1913 vision for the Academy included actively supporting newly recognized disciplines, industrial sciences, and the humanities.

Answer: True

George Ellery Hale's vision for the Academy in 1913 indeed encompassed a broad engagement with science, including newly recognized disciplines, industrial sciences, and the humanities.

Related Concepts:

  • What vision did George Ellery Hale propose for the Academy at its 50th anniversary in 1913?: On the occasion of the Academy's 50th anniversary in 1913, George Ellery Hale presented a paper outlining an expansive future agenda. He envisioned an Academy that would engage with the entire spectrum of science, actively supporting newly recognized disciplines, industrial sciences, and the humanities.

Hale's suggestions for creating sections of medicine and engineering were widely accepted due to their clear commercial benefits.

Answer: False

Hale's suggestions were initially met with protest, with one member arguing that these professions were 'mainly followed for pecuniary gain,' indicating a resistance rather than wide acceptance due to commercial benefits.

Related Concepts:

  • Why were Hale's suggestions for creating sections of medicine and engineering initially met with protest?: Hale's suggestions for creating sections of medicine and engineering were protested by one member who argued that these professions were 'mainly followed for pecuniary gain.' This highlights a historical tension between pure scientific pursuit and applied, commercially-oriented fields.

An Academy study group concluded in 1917 that claims of repeated interruptions to Panama Canal traffic due to slides were well-founded.

Answer: False

The Academy's study group concluded in 1917 that claims of *future repeated interruptions* to Panama Canal traffic due to slides were unfounded, despite an earlier slide delaying the canal's opening.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant engineering challenge did the Academy investigate in 1913, and what was the outcome?: In late 1913, the Academy was asked to investigate a major slide in the Culebra Cut, which ultimately delayed the opening of the Panama Canal by ten months. The study group, comprising engineers and geologists, concluded in its November 1917 report to President Wilson that claims of repeated interruptions to canal traffic in the future were unfounded.

Engineering societies contributed to national preparedness before World War I by offering technical services to the Federal government, such as through the Naval Consulting Board.

Answer: True

Prior to World War I, engineering societies actively supported national preparedness by providing technical services to the Federal government, exemplified by their involvement with the Naval Consulting Board and the Council of National Defense.

Related Concepts:

  • How did engineering societies contribute to national preparedness before the United States' entry into World War I?: During the period of national preparations for World War I, engineering societies offered technical services to the Federal government. Examples include the Naval Consulting Board of 1915 and the Council of National Defense of 1916, demonstrating the profession's readiness to support national security.

President Woodrow Wilson requested the National Academy of Sciences to organize a 'National Research Council' in 1916, with assistance from the Engineering Foundation, to stimulate research and strengthen national defense.

Answer: True

In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson indeed requested the National Academy of Sciences to establish the National Research Council, with support from the Engineering Foundation, to advance research and bolster national defense.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the role of the National Research Council (NRC) as requested by President Woodrow Wilson in 1916?: On June 19, 1916, President Woodrow Wilson requested the National Academy of Sciences to organize a 'National Research Council' with assistance from the Engineering Foundation. The NRC's purpose was to stimulate research in mathematical, physical, and biological sciences, and their application to engineering, agriculture, medicine, and other useful arts, to increase knowledge, strengthen national defense, and promote public welfare.

The representation of engineers within the National Academy of Sciences significantly increased from its founding in 1863 to the early 20th century.

Answer: False

Contrary to an increase, the representation of engineers within the National Academy of Sciences actually declined significantly from its founding in 1863 to the early 20th century, with only one representative remaining by 1912.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the representation of engineers within the National Academy of Sciences change from its founding to the early 20th century?: At its founding in 1863, prominent military and naval engineers constituted almost a fifth of the NAS membership. However, this engineering membership steadily declined during the latter part of the 19th century, with only one representative of the Corps of Engineers remaining by 1912.

The first dedicated engineering section within the National Academy of Sciences was established in 1919, with Henry Larcom Abbot as its initial chairman.

Answer: True

The first dedicated engineering section within the National Academy of Sciences was indeed established in 1919, and Henry Larcom Abbot, a Civil War veteran, served as its inaugural chairman.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the first dedicated engineering section established within the National Academy of Sciences, and who was its initial chairman?: The Academy established its first dedicated engineering section in 1919, with Civil War veteran Henry Larcom Abbot serving as its first chairman. This marked a significant step towards formal recognition of engineering as a distinct discipline within the scientific body.

After World War I, the engineering profession's prestige generally increased due to its wartime contributions.

Answer: False

Following World War I, the engineering profession's prestige actually declined, partly due to the ascendancy of science in the public perception, despite engineering's wartime contributions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the prevailing perception of the engineering profession's prestige compared to science after World War I?: After World War I, the ascendancy of science in the public mind was partly at the expense of the engineering profession's prestige. This suggests a shift in public and institutional focus towards scientific research over applied engineering during that era.

Eric Arthur Walker, President of the Engineers Joint Council, was instrumental in planning for the establishment of the new National Academy of Engineering.

Answer: True

Eric Arthur Walker, as President of the Engineers Joint Council, was a pivotal figure in the planning and establishment of the National Academy of Engineering, recognizing the opportunity for engineers to advise the government.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was a key figure in leading the Engineers Joint Council to plan for a new National Academy of Engineering?: Eric Arthur Walker, President of the Engineers Joint Council, was the prime mover in making plans to establish a new National Academy of Engineering. He saw this as a unique opportunity for the engineering profession to directly advise the government on national policy related to engineering.

Who signed the Act of Incorporation that established the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in 1863?

Answer: President Abraham Lincoln

President Abraham Lincoln signed the Act of Incorporation on March 3, 1863, formally establishing the National Academy of Sciences.

Related Concepts:

  • When and by whom was the National Academy of Sciences, the parent organization of NAE, originally established?: The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was established by an Act of Incorporation on March 3, 1863, signed by then-President of the United States Abraham Lincoln. Its initial purpose was to investigate, examine, experiment, and report on subjects of science or art for the government.

When was engineering first formally recognized within the National Academy of Sciences' committee structure?

Answer: 1899

Engineering was first formally recognized within the National Academy of Sciences' committee structure in 1899, with the establishment of a 'physics and engineering' standing committee.

Related Concepts:

  • When was engineering first formally recognized within the National Academy of Sciences' committee structure?: Engineering was first recognized within the National Academy of Sciences' committee structure in 1899 with the establishment of standing committees, one of which was 'physics and engineering.' This marked an early acknowledgment of the field's importance within the scientific body.

What was a key aspect of George Ellery Hale's vision for the Academy at its 50th anniversary in 1913?

Answer: To engage with industrial sciences and the humanities.

George Ellery Hale's 1913 vision for the Academy emphasized an expansive agenda, including active engagement with industrial sciences and the humanities, alongside newly recognized scientific disciplines.

Related Concepts:

  • What vision did George Ellery Hale propose for the Academy at its 50th anniversary in 1913?: On the occasion of the Academy's 50th anniversary in 1913, George Ellery Hale presented a paper outlining an expansive future agenda. He envisioned an Academy that would engage with the entire spectrum of science, actively supporting newly recognized disciplines, industrial sciences, and the humanities.

Why were Hale's suggestions for creating sections of medicine and engineering initially met with protest?

Answer: One member argued these professions were 'mainly followed for pecuniary gain.'

Hale's proposals for medicine and engineering sections faced initial protest from a member who contended that these professions were primarily driven by 'pecuniary gain,' reflecting a historical bias against applied fields within the Academy.

Related Concepts:

  • Why were Hale's suggestions for creating sections of medicine and engineering initially met with protest?: Hale's suggestions for creating sections of medicine and engineering were protested by one member who argued that these professions were 'mainly followed for pecuniary gain.' This highlights a historical tension between pure scientific pursuit and applied, commercially-oriented fields.

What was the outcome of the Academy's 1913 investigation into the Culebra Cut slide in the Panama Canal?

Answer: The report concluded that claims of future repeated interruptions were unfounded.

The Academy's 1917 report on the Culebra Cut slide in the Panama Canal concluded that predictions of future repeated interruptions to canal traffic were unfounded, despite the initial delay caused by the slide.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant engineering challenge did the Academy investigate in 1913, and what was the outcome?: In late 1913, the Academy was asked to investigate a major slide in the Culebra Cut, which ultimately delayed the opening of the Panama Canal by ten months. The study group, comprising engineers and geologists, concluded in its November 1917 report to President Wilson that claims of repeated interruptions to canal traffic in the future were unfounded.

Which of the following was an example of engineering societies contributing to national preparedness before World War I?

Answer: The formation of the Council of National Defense in 1916.

Engineering societies contributed to national preparedness before World War I through initiatives such as the Naval Consulting Board of 1915 and the Council of National Defense of 1916, offering crucial technical services to the federal government.

Related Concepts:

  • How did engineering societies contribute to national preparedness before the United States' entry into World War I?: During the period of national preparations for World War I, engineering societies offered technical services to the Federal government. Examples include the Naval Consulting Board of 1915 and the Council of National Defense of 1916, demonstrating the profession's readiness to support national security.

What was the primary purpose of the National Research Council (NRC) as requested by President Woodrow Wilson in 1916?

Answer: To stimulate research in various sciences and their application to useful arts, and strengthen national defense.

President Wilson's request for the National Research Council in 1916 aimed to stimulate research across various sciences and their applications, thereby strengthening national defense and promoting public welfare.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the role of the National Research Council (NRC) as requested by President Woodrow Wilson in 1916?: On June 19, 1916, President Woodrow Wilson requested the National Academy of Sciences to organize a 'National Research Council' with assistance from the Engineering Foundation. The NRC's purpose was to stimulate research in mathematical, physical, and biological sciences, and their application to engineering, agriculture, medicine, and other useful arts, to increase knowledge, strengthen national defense, and promote public welfare.

How did the representation of engineers within the National Academy of Sciences change from its founding in 1863 to the early 20th century?

Answer: It steadily declined, with only one representative of the Corps of Engineers remaining by 1912.

From its founding in 1863, where engineers comprised nearly a fifth of the membership, their representation within the National Academy of Sciences steadily declined, reaching a low of only one Corps of Engineers representative by 1912.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the representation of engineers within the National Academy of Sciences change from its founding to the early 20th century?: At its founding in 1863, prominent military and naval engineers constituted almost a fifth of the NAS membership. However, this engineering membership steadily declined during the latter part of the 19th century, with only one representative of the Corps of Engineers remaining by 1912.

Who was the first chairman of the first dedicated engineering section established within the National Academy of Sciences in 1919?

Answer: Henry Larcom Abbot

Henry Larcom Abbot, a Civil War veteran, was the first chairman of the dedicated engineering section established within the National Academy of Sciences in 1919.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the first dedicated engineering section established within the National Academy of Sciences, and who was its initial chairman?: The Academy established its first dedicated engineering section in 1919, with Civil War veteran Henry Larcom Abbot serving as its first chairman. This marked a significant step towards formal recognition of engineering as a distinct discipline within the scientific body.

What was the prevailing perception of the engineering profession's prestige after World War I?

Answer: It declined, partly at the expense of science's ascendancy.

After World War I, the engineering profession experienced a decline in prestige, largely due to the rising public and institutional prominence of science.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the prevailing perception of the engineering profession's prestige compared to science after World War I?: After World War I, the ascendancy of science in the public mind was partly at the expense of the engineering profession's prestige. This suggests a shift in public and institutional focus towards scientific research over applied engineering during that era.

Who was identified as the 'prime mover' in planning for the establishment of a new National Academy of Engineering?

Answer: Eric Arthur Walker

Eric Arthur Walker, then President of the Engineers Joint Council, was recognized as the 'prime mover' in the strategic planning for the establishment of the National Academy of Engineering.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was a key figure in leading the Engineers Joint Council to plan for a new National Academy of Engineering?: Eric Arthur Walker, President of the Engineers Joint Council, was the prime mover in making plans to establish a new National Academy of Engineering. He saw this as a unique opportunity for the engineering profession to directly advise the government on national policy related to engineering.

Organizational Structure, Governance, and Membership

The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) is an independent governmental organization that advises the President directly on engineering matters, separate from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Answer: False

The NAE is a nonprofit, non-governmental organization and is part of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), not separate from it. It advises the federal government, not solely the President directly.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and what is its affiliation?: The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) is an American nonprofit, non-governmental organization. It is a part of the larger National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), alongside the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). These organizations collectively advise the nation on science, engineering, and medicine.
  • How was the National Academy of Engineering ultimately structured upon its formation in 1964?: The National Academy of Engineering was ultimately created as an autonomous parallel body within the National Academy of Sciences. This structure was a 'purposeful compromise' given the NAS's concerns about expanding its membership with engineers, allowing for a distinct yet affiliated engineering academy.

A primary function of the NAE is to operate engineering programs that address national needs and to acknowledge significant accomplishments of engineers.

Answer: True

The NAE's primary functions include operating engineering programs to address national needs and acknowledging significant accomplishments of engineers, as well as advising the federal government.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary functions and objectives of the National Academy of Engineering?: The NAE operates engineering programs designed to address national needs, promotes education and research in engineering, and acknowledges the significant accomplishments of engineers. Its core mission involves advising the federal government on engineering-related matters, a role it shares with the other National Academies.
  • What were the three main stated objects and purposes of the newly created National Academy of Engineering?: The three main stated objects and purposes of the NAE were: to advise Congress and the executive branch on national engineering matters when called upon; to cooperate with the National Academy of Sciences on issues involving both science and engineering; and to serve the nation in addressing significant problems in engineering and technology.

New members of the NAE are selected by a government-appointed committee based on their contributions to national defense.

Answer: False

New NAE members are elected by existing members based on distinguished achievements in original engineering research, not by a government-appointed committee or solely on national defense contributions.

Related Concepts:

  • How are new members selected for the National Academy of Engineering?: New members of the NAE are elected annually by existing members. This selection is based on their distinguished and continuous achievements in original research within engineering. The NAE maintains autonomy in its administrative processes and in the selection of its members.

The National Academy of Engineering was formed as a fully independent organization, completely separate from the National Academy of Sciences.

Answer: False

The NAE was formed as an autonomous parallel body *within* the National Academy of Sciences, representing a 'purposeful compromise' rather than complete separation.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the National Academy of Engineering ultimately structured upon its formation in 1964?: The National Academy of Engineering was ultimately created as an autonomous parallel body within the National Academy of Sciences. This structure was a 'purposeful compromise' given the NAS's concerns about expanding its membership with engineers, allowing for a distinct yet affiliated engineering academy.
  • What is the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and what is its affiliation?: The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) is an American nonprofit, non-governmental organization. It is a part of the larger National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), alongside the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). These organizations collectively advise the nation on science, engineering, and medicine.

Augustus B. Kinzel was the first President of the National Academy of Engineering, taking office in 1964.

Answer: True

Augustus B. Kinzel was indeed the inaugural President of the National Academy of Engineering, assuming leadership upon its formal organization in December 1964.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the first President of the National Academy of Engineering?: Augustus B. Kinzel was the first President of the National Academy of Engineering, taking office when the NAE was formally organized on December 5, 1964.

One of the NAE's main stated purposes was to advise state governments on engineering matters when called upon.

Answer: False

The NAE's stated purpose was to advise *Congress and the executive branch* on national engineering matters, not state governments.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the three main stated objects and purposes of the newly created National Academy of Engineering?: The three main stated objects and purposes of the NAE were: to advise Congress and the executive branch on national engineering matters when called upon; to cooperate with the National Academy of Sciences on issues involving both science and engineering; and to serve the nation in addressing significant problems in engineering and technology.

All members of the National Academy of Engineering must be U.S. citizens; non-citizens are not eligible for any form of membership.

Answer: False

While formal members must be U.S. citizens, non-citizens are eligible for 'international member' status, recognizing their distinguished global contributions to engineering.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the formal citizenship requirements for members of the National Academy of Engineering?: Formally, members of the National Academy of Engineering must be U.S. citizens. Non-citizens who are elected to the NAE are referred to as 'international members,' acknowledging their distinguished contributions to engineering globally.

Nomination for NAE membership requires contributions in either engineering research, practice, or education, or pioneering new fields of technology.

Answer: True

NAE membership nomination indeed requires distinguished achievements in categories such as engineering research, practice, education, or pioneering new technological fields.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the two main categories of distinguished achievements required for nomination to the NAE?: Nomination for NAE membership requires outstanding engineers to have identifiable contributions or accomplishments in one or both of two categories: engineering research, practice, or education (including significant contributions to literature); or pioneering new fields of technology, making major advancements in traditional engineering, or developing innovative approaches to engineering education.
  • How are new members selected for the National Academy of Engineering?: New members of the NAE are elected annually by existing members. This selection is based on their distinguished and continuous achievements in original research within engineering. The NAE maintains autonomy in its administrative processes and in the selection of its members.

As of late-2024, Harvard University is associated with the highest number of NAE members.

Answer: False

As of late-2024, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is associated with the highest number of NAE members, not Harvard University.

Related Concepts:

  • Which three academic institutions are associated with the highest number of NAE members?: As of late-2024, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is associated with the most NAE members (207), followed by Stanford University (172), and the University of California at Berkeley (127). These institutions represent a significant portion of all members ever elected.

Which of the following best describes the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)?

Answer: An American nonprofit, non-governmental organization that is part of NASEM.

The NAE is accurately described as an American nonprofit, non-governmental organization that functions as a component of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM).

Related Concepts:

  • What is the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and what is its affiliation?: The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) is an American nonprofit, non-governmental organization. It is a part of the larger National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), alongside the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). These organizations collectively advise the nation on science, engineering, and medicine.

What is a core mission of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)?

Answer: To advise the federal government on engineering-related matters.

A core mission of the NAE is to advise the federal government on engineering-related matters, a role it shares within the broader National Academies framework.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary functions and objectives of the National Academy of Engineering?: The NAE operates engineering programs designed to address national needs, promotes education and research in engineering, and acknowledges the significant accomplishments of engineers. Its core mission involves advising the federal government on engineering-related matters, a role it shares with the other National Academies.
  • What were the three main stated objects and purposes of the newly created National Academy of Engineering?: The three main stated objects and purposes of the NAE were: to advise Congress and the executive branch on national engineering matters when called upon; to cooperate with the National Academy of Sciences on issues involving both science and engineering; and to serve the nation in addressing significant problems in engineering and technology.

How are new members primarily selected for the National Academy of Engineering?

Answer: Elected by existing members based on distinguished achievements in original research.

New members of the NAE are primarily elected by existing members, recognizing their distinguished and continuous achievements in original engineering research.

Related Concepts:

  • How are new members selected for the National Academy of Engineering?: New members of the NAE are elected annually by existing members. This selection is based on their distinguished and continuous achievements in original research within engineering. The NAE maintains autonomy in its administrative processes and in the selection of its members.
  • What are the two main categories of distinguished achievements required for nomination to the NAE?: Nomination for NAE membership requires outstanding engineers to have identifiable contributions or accomplishments in one or both of two categories: engineering research, practice, or education (including significant contributions to literature); or pioneering new fields of technology, making major advancements in traditional engineering, or developing innovative approaches to engineering education.

How was the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) structured upon its formation in 1964?

Answer: As an autonomous parallel body within the National Academy of Sciences.

Upon its formation in 1964, the NAE was structured as an autonomous parallel body within the National Academy of Sciences, a 'purposeful compromise' to ensure its distinct yet affiliated status.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and what is its affiliation?: The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) is an American nonprofit, non-governmental organization. It is a part of the larger National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), alongside the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). These organizations collectively advise the nation on science, engineering, and medicine.
  • How was the National Academy of Engineering ultimately structured upon its formation in 1964?: The National Academy of Engineering was ultimately created as an autonomous parallel body within the National Academy of Sciences. This structure was a 'purposeful compromise' given the NAS's concerns about expanding its membership with engineers, allowing for a distinct yet affiliated engineering academy.

Who served as the first President of the National Academy of Engineering?

Answer: Augustus B. Kinzel

Augustus B. Kinzel was the first President of the National Academy of Engineering, assuming his role upon the NAE's formal organization in December 1964.

Related Concepts:

  • Who are the Presidents of the National Academy of Engineering and their respective terms?: The Presidents of the National Academy of Engineering and their terms are: Augustus B. Kinzel (1964-1966), Eric A. Walker (1966-1970), Clarence H. Linder (1970-1973), Robert C. Seamans Jr. (1973-1974), William E. Shoupp (1974-1975), Courtland D. Perkins (1975-1983), Robert M. White (1983-1995), Harold Liebowitz (1995-1996), Wm. A. Wulf (1996-2007), Charles M. Vest (2007-2013), C. D. Mote, Jr. (2013-2019), John L. Anderson (2019-2025), and Tsu-Jae King Liu (2025-Present).
  • Who was the first President of the National Academy of Engineering?: Augustus B. Kinzel was the first President of the National Academy of Engineering, taking office when the NAE was formally organized on December 5, 1964.

Which of the following was NOT one of the three main stated objects and purposes of the newly created NAE?

Answer: To regulate the licensing of professional engineers nationwide.

Regulating the licensing of professional engineers nationwide was not among the three main stated objects and purposes of the newly created NAE; its focus was on advising the government, cooperating with NAS, and addressing national engineering problems.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the three main stated objects and purposes of the newly created National Academy of Engineering?: The three main stated objects and purposes of the NAE were: to advise Congress and the executive branch on national engineering matters when called upon; to cooperate with the National Academy of Sciences on issues involving both science and engineering; and to serve the nation in addressing significant problems in engineering and technology.

What are the formal citizenship requirements for members of the National Academy of Engineering?

Answer: Members must be U.S. citizens, but non-citizens can be 'international members.'

While formal NAE membership is restricted to U.S. citizens, non-citizens are eligible for recognition as 'international members' due to their distinguished global contributions to engineering.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the formal citizenship requirements for members of the National Academy of Engineering?: Formally, members of the National Academy of Engineering must be U.S. citizens. Non-citizens who are elected to the NAE are referred to as 'international members,' acknowledging their distinguished contributions to engineering globally.

Which academic institution is associated with the most NAE members as of late-2024?

Answer: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

As of late-2024, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is associated with the highest number of NAE members, followed by Stanford University and the University of California at Berkeley.

Related Concepts:

  • Which three academic institutions are associated with the highest number of NAE members?: As of late-2024, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is associated with the most NAE members (207), followed by Stanford University (172), and the University of California at Berkeley (127). These institutions represent a significant portion of all members ever elected.

Policy Advisory Role and Key Programs

The Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP) was established by the NAE in 1966 to provide policy guidance on engineering matters.

Answer: True

The Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP) was indeed established by the NAE in 1966 with the explicit aim of offering policy guidance on engineering-related issues.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP), and when was it established?: The Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP) was established by the National Academy of Engineering in 1966. Its purpose was to provide policy guidance on engineering matters, and it later merged with a NAS committee to form the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy in 1982.

In 1971, the NAE advised the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to construct additional runways at JFK airport, which the Port Authority then implemented.

Answer: False

In 1971, the NAE advised *against* constructing additional runways at JFK airport, and the Port Authority accepted this recommendation.

Related Concepts:

  • What advice did the NAE provide to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1971?: In 1971, the National Academy of Engineering advised the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey against constructing additional runways at JFK airport. The Port Authority accepted these recommendations, which were part of a $350,000 study.

NAE member Robert W. Rummel served on The Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident in 1986.

Answer: True

Robert W. Rummel, an NAE member and aerospace expert, did serve on The Presidential Commission investigating the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident in 1986.

Related Concepts:

  • Which NAE member played a role in the investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident?: NAE member Robert W. Rummel, a space expert and aerospace engineer, served on The Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident in 1986. This commission investigated the causes and circumstances of the tragic disaster.

In 1995, the NAE recommended that doctoral education in science and engineering should focus on producing more narrowly specialized researchers.

Answer: False

In 1995, the NAE, along with other Academies, recommended reshaping doctoral education to produce more 'versatile scientists' rather than more narrowly specialized researchers, advocating for a broader approach.

Related Concepts:

  • What recommendation did the National Academy of Engineering make in 1995 regarding doctoral education in science and engineering?: In 1995, the NAE, along with the NAS and the National Academy of Medicine, reported that the American system of doctoral education in science and engineering, despite being a world model, should be reshaped. The recommendation was to produce more 'versatile scientists' rather than narrowly specialized researchers, emphasizing a broader training approach.

The NAE's 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project concluded that current engineering education was adequately preparing American engineers for future practice.

Answer: False

The 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project concluded that engineering education needed reform, asserting that without changes, American engineers would be *poorly prepared* for future practice.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the key conclusion of the NAE's 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project regarding engineering education?: The NAE's 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project concluded that engineering education needed reform. It stated that without changes, American engineers would be poorly prepared for future engineering practice, advocating for adaptations to meet the demands of the new century.

The Frontiers of Engineering program aims to bring together senior engineering leaders (over 60) to discuss established research.

Answer: False

The Frontiers of Engineering program targets *emerging* engineering leaders, typically aged 30–45, to discuss *cutting-edge* research, not senior leaders discussing established research.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary objective of the Frontiers of Engineering program?: The primary objective of the Frontiers of Engineering program is to bring together emerging engineering leaders, typically aged 30–45, to discuss cutting-edge research in various engineering fields and industry sectors. The goal is to foster collaboration, networking, and the sharing of innovative ideas among these professionals.

The NAE's diversity office focuses on increasing and broadening the domestic talent pool in engineering.

Answer: True

The NAE's diversity office is dedicated to increasing and broadening the domestic talent pool within the engineering profession through various studies, workshops, and coordination efforts.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the goal of the NAE's diversity office in the engineering workplace?: The goal of the NAE's diversity office is to participate in studies that address the issue of increasing and broadening the domestic talent pool in engineering. This involves convening workshops, coordinating with other organizations, and identifying program needs and opportunities for improvement to promote a more inclusive engineering profession.

The 'Engineering and the Environment' program aims to highlight engineering's historical role in causing environmental harm.

Answer: False

The 'Engineering and the Environment' program aims to recognize engineering's current role in *mitigating* negative environmental impacts and guiding policy towards a sustainable future, moving beyond its historical association with environmental harm.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the NAE's 'Engineering and the Environment' program?: The 'Engineering and the Environment' program aims to recognize and publicize that the engineering profession is now at the forefront of mitigating negative environmental impacts, moving past its historical association with causing environmental harm. It seeks to provide policy guidance to government, the private sector, and the public for creating a more environmentally sustainable future.

The Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society works to engage engineers in identifying and resolving ethical issues in engineering.

Answer: True

The Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society actively engages engineers and the profession in identifying and resolving ethical issues pertinent to engineering research and practice, often in collaboration with the Online Ethics Center.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the focus of the Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society?: The Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society aims to engage engineers and the engineering profession in identifying and resolving ethical issues associated with engineering research and practice. It works closely with the Online Ethics Center to promote ethical considerations in engineering.

When was the Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP) established by the NAE?

Answer: 1966

The Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP) was established by the NAE in 1966 to provide policy guidance on engineering matters.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP), and when was it established?: The Committee on Public Engineering Policy (COPEP) was established by the National Academy of Engineering in 1966. Its purpose was to provide policy guidance on engineering matters, and it later merged with a NAS committee to form the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy in 1982.

What advice did the NAE provide to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1971 regarding JFK airport?

Answer: To advise against constructing additional runways.

In 1971, the NAE advised the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey *against* the construction of additional runways at JFK airport, a recommendation that was subsequently accepted.

Related Concepts:

  • What advice did the NAE provide to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1971?: In 1971, the National Academy of Engineering advised the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey against constructing additional runways at JFK airport. The Port Authority accepted these recommendations, which were part of a $350,000 study.

Which NAE member served on The Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident in 1986?

Answer: Robert W. Rummel

NAE member Robert W. Rummel, an expert in space and aerospace engineering, served on The Presidential Commission investigating the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident in 1986.

Related Concepts:

  • Which NAE member played a role in the investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident?: NAE member Robert W. Rummel, a space expert and aerospace engineer, served on The Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident in 1986. This commission investigated the causes and circumstances of the tragic disaster.

What recommendation did the NAE make in 1995 regarding doctoral education in science and engineering?

Answer: To produce more 'versatile scientists' rather than narrowly specialized researchers.

In 1995, the NAE recommended reshaping doctoral education in science and engineering to cultivate 'versatile scientists' with broader training, moving away from an exclusive focus on narrow specialization.

Related Concepts:

  • What recommendation did the National Academy of Engineering make in 1995 regarding doctoral education in science and engineering?: In 1995, the NAE, along with the NAS and the National Academy of Medicine, reported that the American system of doctoral education in science and engineering, despite being a world model, should be reshaped. The recommendation was to produce more 'versatile scientists' rather than narrowly specialized researchers, emphasizing a broader training approach.

What was the key conclusion of the NAE's 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project?

Answer: Engineering education needed reform to prepare engineers for future practice.

The NAE's 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project concluded that significant reforms were necessary in engineering education to adequately prepare American engineers for the evolving demands of future practice.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the key conclusion of the NAE's 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project regarding engineering education?: The NAE's 'Engineer of 2020 Studies' project concluded that engineering education needed reform. It stated that without changes, American engineers would be poorly prepared for future engineering practice, advocating for adaptations to meet the demands of the new century.

What is the primary objective of the Frontiers of Engineering program?

Answer: To bring together emerging engineering leaders to discuss cutting-edge research.

The Frontiers of Engineering program's primary objective is to convene emerging engineering leaders (aged 30–45) to engage in discussions about cutting-edge research and foster interdisciplinary collaboration.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary objective of the Frontiers of Engineering program?: The primary objective of the Frontiers of Engineering program is to bring together emerging engineering leaders, typically aged 30–45, to discuss cutting-edge research in various engineering fields and industry sectors. The goal is to foster collaboration, networking, and the sharing of innovative ideas among these professionals.

What is the focus of the NAE's 'Engineering, Economics, and Society' program area?

Answer: Studying the connections between engineering, technology, and the economic performance of the United States.

The 'Engineering, Economics, and Society' program area within the NAE focuses on analyzing the intricate relationships between engineering, technology, and the economic performance of the United States, aiming to highlight engineering's contributions to the domestic economy.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the focus of the NAE's 'Engineering, Economics, and Society' program area?: This program area focuses on studying the connections between engineering, technology, and the economic performance of the United States. Its efforts aim to enhance the understanding of engineering's contributions to the domestic economy and identify areas where engineering can further improve economic performance.

What is the purpose of the NAE's 'Engineering and the Environment' program?

Answer: To promote engineering as a field for mitigating negative environmental impacts and creating a sustainable future.

The 'Engineering and the Environment' program aims to highlight engineering's proactive role in mitigating negative environmental impacts and guiding policy towards a sustainable future, rather than solely documenting past harms.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the NAE's 'Engineering and the Environment' program?: The 'Engineering and the Environment' program aims to recognize and publicize that the engineering profession is now at the forefront of mitigating negative environmental impacts, moving past its historical association with causing environmental harm. It seeks to provide policy guidance to government, the private sector, and the public for creating a more environmentally sustainable future.

Recognizing Engineering Achievements and Grand Challenges

Neil Armstrong announced the 20 top engineering achievements of the 20th century in February 2000.

Answer: True

Astronaut and engineer Neil Armstrong indeed announced the NAE's list of the 20 top engineering achievements of the 20th century in February 2000.

Related Concepts:

  • Who announced the 20 top engineering achievements of the 20th century, and when?: Astronaut and engineer Neil Armstrong announced the 20 top engineering achievements that had the greatest impact on the quality of life in the 20th century in February 2000, during a National Press Club luncheon sponsored by the NAE.

The NAE's top engineering achievement of the 20th century was the automobile, due to its profound impact on global transportation.

Answer: False

According to the NAE, the top engineering achievement of the 20th century was electrification, not the automobile, due to its pervasive impact across modern society.

Related Concepts:

  • List the top five greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century as ranked by the NAE.: The top five greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century, as ranked by the NAE, are: 1. Electrification, 2. Automobile, 3. Airplane, 4. Water Supply and Distribution, and 5. Electronics.
  • What was the top engineering achievement of the 20th century according to the NAE, and why was it considered so important?: The top engineering achievement of the 20th century, according to the NAE, was electrification. It was deemed essential for almost every part of modern society, having 'literally lighted the world and impacted countless areas of daily life,' including food production, air conditioning, refrigeration, entertainment, transportation, communication, health care, and computers.

The NAE's list of 20th-century engineering achievements was criticized for ranking space technology too highly, given its limited societal impact.

Answer: False

The NAE's list was criticized for ranking space technology (Spacecraft) *twelfth*, potentially *underestimating* its impact, rather than ranking it too highly.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticism did the NAE's list of 20th-century engineering achievements receive regarding space technology?: The NAE's list was criticized for ranking space technology (Spacecraft) twelfth, despite the NAE itself acknowledging that the Soviet Union's Sputnik 'shocked the world and started a space race that launched the greatest engineering team effort in American history.' This suggested a potential underestimation of its impact.

The NAE's Grand Challenges for Engineering primarily focus on purely technical solutions to isolated engineering problems.

Answer: False

The NAE's Grand Challenges address 'wicked social issues' that are global in nature and require systems thinking, often extending beyond purely technical solutions to involve public policy and social sciences.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the NAE's Grand Challenges relate to international development goals?: The NAE's Grand Challenges overlap with the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals and their successor, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Success in achieving these international goals is seen as dependent upon a strong engineering component, underscoring the global relevance of engineering solutions.
  • What kind of issues do the NAE's Grand Challenges for Engineering address?: The NAE's Grand Challenges for Engineering confront 'wicked social issues' that are inherently global in nature. These issues require technological innovations and the application of systems thinking, often extending beyond purely technical solutions to involve public policy and social sciences.

The NAE's Grand Challenges for Engineering were announced in February 2008 and were categorized into four broad areas, including energy and sustainability.

Answer: True

The 14 Engineering Grand Challenges were indeed announced in February 2008 and organized into four broad categories, with energy, sustainability, and global climate change being one of them.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the 14 Engineering Grand Challenges announced, and what were their four broad categories?: The 14 Engineering Grand Challenges were announced in February 2008. They fit into four broad categories: energy, sustainability, and global climate change; medicine, health informatics, and health care delivery systems; reducing vulnerability to natural and human threats; and advancing the human spirit and capabilities.
  • List at least five of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering identified by the NAE.: Five of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering include: Make solar energy economical, Provide energy from fusion, Develop carbon sequestration, Manage the nitrogen cycle, and Provide access to clean water. Other challenges address urban infrastructure, health informatics, better medicines, reverse-engineering the brain, preventing nuclear terror, securing cyberspace, enhancing virtual reality, advancing personalized learning, and engineering tools for scientific discovery.
  • How do the NAE's Grand Challenges relate to international development goals?: The NAE's Grand Challenges overlap with the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals and their successor, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Success in achieving these international goals is seen as dependent upon a strong engineering component, underscoring the global relevance of engineering solutions.

Carl Mitcham argued that the NAE's Grand Challenges should have included a challenge for engineers to reflect on the ethical limitations of engineering power.

Answer: True

Carl Mitcham critically suggested that the Grand Challenges should have incorporated a call for engineers to engage in ethical reflection regarding the pervasive influence and limitations of engineering power.

Related Concepts:

  • What critical perspective did Carl Mitcham offer regarding the NAE's Grand Challenges?: Carl Mitcham critically observed that engineers are the 'unacknowledged legislators of the world' and argued that the NAE's Grand Challenges should have included 'the challenge of thinking about what we are doing as we turn the world into an (engineering) artifact and the appropriate limitations of this engineering power.' He suggested a need for self-reflection on the ethical implications of engineering's pervasive influence.

A criticism of the Grand Challenges related to sustainability was that they failed to define a sustainable level of energy use on a global scale.

Answer: True

A specific criticism of the sustainability challenges was their focus on individual elements without defining a global sustainable level of energy use, highlighting a gap in comprehensive planning.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific criticism was raised about the Grand Challenges related to sustainability and energy use?: A criticism regarding the sustainability challenges was that they concentrated on specific elements of the problem without addressing 'what level of energy use would be sustainable on a global scale.' For instance, while the U.S. requires 12,000 Watts per person, a Swiss group estimated a sustainable level at 2,000 Watts per person, highlighting a gap in defining overall sustainable consumption.

The Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) was developed by the NAE in 2010 to prepare graduate students for careers related to solving the Grand Challenges.

Answer: False

The Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) was developed to prepare *undergraduate* engineering students, not graduate students, for careers related to solving the Grand Challenges.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) developed by the NAE?: The Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP), developed by the NAE in 2010, aims to prepare undergraduate engineering students for career fields that will emerge from the effort to solve the Grand Challenges. It focuses on equipping them with the necessary skills and perspectives for these complex, global problems.

One of the five core components of the GCSP is a global dimension to address international challenges.

Answer: True

A global dimension, aimed at addressing international challenges, is indeed one of the five core components of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP).

Related Concepts:

  • What are the five core components of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP)?: The five core components of the GCSP are: research experience related to a Grand Challenge; an interdisciplinary curriculum covering public policy, business, law, ethics, human behavior, risk, medicine, and sciences; entrepreneurship skills to translate invention to global innovation; a global dimension to address international challenges; and service learning to engage engineers' social consciousness through programs like Engineers Without Borders.

The first Global Grand Challenges Summit was organized solely by the National Academy of Engineering of the United States in 2013.

Answer: False

The first Global Grand Challenges Summit in 2013 was a joint effort, organized by the NAE of the United States, The Royal Academy of Engineering of the United Kingdom, and the Chinese Academy of Engineering, not solely by the U.S. NAE.

Related Concepts:

  • Which national engineering academies organized the first Global Grand Challenges Summit, and when was it held?: The first Global Grand Challenges Summit was organized jointly by three national engineering academies: the National Academy of Engineering of the United States, The Royal Academy of Engineering of the United Kingdom, and the Chinese Academy of Engineering. It was held in London on March 12–13, 2013.

Who announced the 20 top engineering achievements of the 20th century in February 2000?

Answer: Neil Armstrong

Astronaut and engineer Neil Armstrong publicly announced the NAE's list of the 20 top engineering achievements of the 20th century in February 2000.

Related Concepts:

  • Who announced the 20 top engineering achievements of the 20th century, and when?: Astronaut and engineer Neil Armstrong announced the 20 top engineering achievements that had the greatest impact on the quality of life in the 20th century in February 2000, during a National Press Club luncheon sponsored by the NAE.
  • What was the top engineering achievement of the 20th century according to the NAE, and why was it considered so important?: The top engineering achievement of the 20th century, according to the NAE, was electrification. It was deemed essential for almost every part of modern society, having 'literally lighted the world and impacted countless areas of daily life,' including food production, air conditioning, refrigeration, entertainment, transportation, communication, health care, and computers.

According to the NAE, what was the top engineering achievement of the 20th century?

Answer: Electrification

The NAE identified electrification as the top engineering achievement of the 20th century, recognizing its fundamental and pervasive impact on nearly all aspects of modern society.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the top engineering achievement of the 20th century according to the NAE, and why was it considered so important?: The top engineering achievement of the 20th century, according to the NAE, was electrification. It was deemed essential for almost every part of modern society, having 'literally lighted the world and impacted countless areas of daily life,' including food production, air conditioning, refrigeration, entertainment, transportation, communication, health care, and computers.
  • List the top five greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century as ranked by the NAE.: The top five greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century, as ranked by the NAE, are: 1. Electrification, 2. Automobile, 3. Airplane, 4. Water Supply and Distribution, and 5. Electronics.

What criticism did the NAE's list of 20th-century engineering achievements receive regarding space technology?

Answer: It was criticized for ranking space technology twelfth, potentially underestimating its impact.

The NAE's list faced criticism for placing space technology (Spacecraft) at twelfth, with some arguing this ranking potentially underestimated its profound historical and societal impact.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticism did the NAE's list of 20th-century engineering achievements receive regarding space technology?: The NAE's list was criticized for ranking space technology (Spacecraft) twelfth, despite the NAE itself acknowledging that the Soviet Union's Sputnik 'shocked the world and started a space race that launched the greatest engineering team effort in American history.' This suggested a potential underestimation of its impact.
  • Who announced the 20 top engineering achievements of the 20th century, and when?: Astronaut and engineer Neil Armstrong announced the 20 top engineering achievements that had the greatest impact on the quality of life in the 20th century in February 2000, during a National Press Club luncheon sponsored by the NAE.

What kind of issues do the NAE's Grand Challenges for Engineering primarily address?

Answer: 'Wicked social issues' that are global in nature and require systems thinking.

The NAE's Grand Challenges are designed to confront 'wicked social issues' that are global in scope, demanding not only technological innovation but also interdisciplinary systems thinking and engagement with public policy.

Related Concepts:

  • What kind of issues do the NAE's Grand Challenges for Engineering address?: The NAE's Grand Challenges for Engineering confront 'wicked social issues' that are inherently global in nature. These issues require technological innovations and the application of systems thinking, often extending beyond purely technical solutions to involve public policy and social sciences.
  • How do the NAE's Grand Challenges relate to international development goals?: The NAE's Grand Challenges overlap with the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals and their successor, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Success in achieving these international goals is seen as dependent upon a strong engineering component, underscoring the global relevance of engineering solutions.
  • When were the 14 Engineering Grand Challenges announced, and what were their four broad categories?: The 14 Engineering Grand Challenges were announced in February 2008. They fit into four broad categories: energy, sustainability, and global climate change; medicine, health informatics, and health care delivery systems; reducing vulnerability to natural and human threats; and advancing the human spirit and capabilities.

Who led the blue-ribbon committee responsible for identifying the Grand Challenges for Engineering?

Answer: William Perry

Former Secretary of Defense William Perry chaired the blue-ribbon committee tasked with identifying the key engineering challenges for improving life in the 21st century, which became the Grand Challenges for Engineering.

Related Concepts:

  • Who led the blue-ribbon committee responsible for identifying the Grand Challenges for Engineering?: The blue-ribbon committee tasked with identifying the 'key engineering challenges for improving life in the 21st century' was led by former Secretary of Defense William Perry. This committee comprised leading technological thinkers from around the globe.

When were the 14 Engineering Grand Challenges announced?

Answer: February 2008

The 14 Engineering Grand Challenges were officially announced in February 2008, outlining critical areas for engineering innovation in the 21st century.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the 14 Engineering Grand Challenges announced, and what were their four broad categories?: The 14 Engineering Grand Challenges were announced in February 2008. They fit into four broad categories: energy, sustainability, and global climate change; medicine, health informatics, and health care delivery systems; reducing vulnerability to natural and human threats; and advancing the human spirit and capabilities.
  • List at least five of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering identified by the NAE.: Five of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering include: Make solar energy economical, Provide energy from fusion, Develop carbon sequestration, Manage the nitrogen cycle, and Provide access to clean water. Other challenges address urban infrastructure, health informatics, better medicines, reverse-engineering the brain, preventing nuclear terror, securing cyberspace, enhancing virtual reality, advancing personalized learning, and engineering tools for scientific discovery.

Which of the following is one of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering identified by the NAE?

Answer: Provide energy from fusion.

Among the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering identified by the NAE, 'Provide energy from fusion' is a key objective, alongside other critical areas like making solar energy economical and providing access to clean water.

Related Concepts:

  • List at least five of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering identified by the NAE.: Five of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering include: Make solar energy economical, Provide energy from fusion, Develop carbon sequestration, Manage the nitrogen cycle, and Provide access to clean water. Other challenges address urban infrastructure, health informatics, better medicines, reverse-engineering the brain, preventing nuclear terror, securing cyberspace, enhancing virtual reality, advancing personalized learning, and engineering tools for scientific discovery.
  • When were the 14 Engineering Grand Challenges announced, and what were their four broad categories?: The 14 Engineering Grand Challenges were announced in February 2008. They fit into four broad categories: energy, sustainability, and global climate change; medicine, health informatics, and health care delivery systems; reducing vulnerability to natural and human threats; and advancing the human spirit and capabilities.

What critical perspective did Carl Mitcham offer regarding the NAE's Grand Challenges?

Answer: He argued they should have included a challenge for ethical reflection on engineering power.

Carl Mitcham's critical perspective suggested that the NAE's Grand Challenges ought to have incorporated a challenge for ethical reflection, prompting engineers to consider the societal implications and limitations of their pervasive power.

Related Concepts:

  • What critical perspective did Carl Mitcham offer regarding the NAE's Grand Challenges?: Carl Mitcham critically observed that engineers are the 'unacknowledged legislators of the world' and argued that the NAE's Grand Challenges should have included 'the challenge of thinking about what we are doing as we turn the world into an (engineering) artifact and the appropriate limitations of this engineering power.' He suggested a need for self-reflection on the ethical implications of engineering's pervasive influence.

What was a criticism raised about the Grand Challenges related to sustainability and energy use?

Answer: They concentrated on specific elements without addressing a global sustainable energy use level.

A notable criticism regarding the Grand Challenges' sustainability aspects was their focus on individual problem elements without comprehensively defining a global sustainable level of energy consumption.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific criticism was raised about the Grand Challenges related to sustainability and energy use?: A criticism regarding the sustainability challenges was that they concentrated on specific elements of the problem without addressing 'what level of energy use would be sustainable on a global scale.' For instance, while the U.S. requires 12,000 Watts per person, a Swiss group estimated a sustainable level at 2,000 Watts per person, highlighting a gap in defining overall sustainable consumption.

What is the primary purpose of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) developed by the NAE?

Answer: To prepare undergraduate engineering students for career fields related to solving the Grand Challenges.

The Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) was specifically designed to prepare undergraduate engineering students for future careers focused on addressing the complex, global Grand Challenges.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) developed by the NAE?: The Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP), developed by the NAE in 2010, aims to prepare undergraduate engineering students for career fields that will emerge from the effort to solve the Grand Challenges. It focuses on equipping them with the necessary skills and perspectives for these complex, global problems.

Which of the following is NOT one of the five core components of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP)?

Answer: Mandatory military service for engineering students.

Mandatory military service is not a component of the GCSP. The five core components include research experience, interdisciplinary curriculum, entrepreneurship, a global dimension, and service learning.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the five core components of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP)?: The five core components of the GCSP are: research experience related to a Grand Challenge; an interdisciplinary curriculum covering public policy, business, law, ethics, human behavior, risk, medicine, and sciences; entrepreneurship skills to translate invention to global innovation; a global dimension to address international challenges; and service learning to engage engineers' social consciousness through programs like Engineers Without Borders.
  • What is the purpose of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) developed by the NAE?: The Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP), developed by the NAE in 2010, aims to prepare undergraduate engineering students for career fields that will emerge from the effort to solve the Grand Challenges. It focuses on equipping them with the necessary skills and perspectives for these complex, global problems.

Which three national engineering academies organized the first Global Grand Challenges Summit in 2013?

Answer: US, UK, and Chinese Academies.

The inaugural Global Grand Challenges Summit in 2013 was a collaborative effort organized by the National Academy of Engineering of the United States, The Royal Academy of Engineering of the United Kingdom, and the Chinese Academy of Engineering.

Related Concepts:

  • Which national engineering academies organized the first Global Grand Challenges Summit, and when was it held?: The first Global Grand Challenges Summit was organized jointly by three national engineering academies: the National Academy of Engineering of the United States, The Royal Academy of Engineering of the United Kingdom, and the Chinese Academy of Engineering. It was held in London on March 12–13, 2013.

NAE Awards and Honors

The Bernard M. Gordon Prize awards $500,000 solely to the individual recipient for their achievements in engineering research.

Answer: False

The Bernard M. Gordon Prize awards $500,000 for new educational approaches to engineering, with the award split between the recipient and their institution, not solely to the individual for research achievements.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the Bernard M. Gordon Prize, and how is its $500,000 award distributed?: The Bernard M. Gordon Prize, established in 2001 and named after Analogic Corporation founder Bernard Marshall Gordon, recognizes leaders in academia for developing new educational approaches to engineering. The $500,000 award is split, with $250,000 going to the recipient personally and $250,000 to their institution for ongoing support of academic development.

The Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize is awarded annually for advancements in aerospace engineering.

Answer: False

The Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize is awarded biennially for bioengineering achievements that have significantly impacted society, not annually for aerospace engineering.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize awarded for, and when was it established?: The Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize was established by the NAE in October 1999 and is given biennially in odd years since 2001. Named after Fritz Russ and his wife Dolores Russ, it recognizes a bioengineering achievement that has significantly impacted society and advanced the human condition through widespread use, honoring an Ohio University alumnus.

The Charles Stark Draper Prize is named after the 'father of inertial navigation' and is awarded for the advancement of engineering.

Answer: True

The Charles Stark Draper Prize is indeed named after Charles S. Draper, the 'father of inertial navigation,' and recognizes advancements in engineering and public education about the field.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Charles Stark Draper Prize awarded for, and who is it named after?: The NAE annually awards the Charles Stark Draper Prize for the advancement of engineering and the education of the public about engineering. The recipient receives $500,000. The prize is named for Charles S. Draper, known as the 'father of inertial navigation,' an MIT professor and founder of the Draper Laboratory.

What is the purpose of the Bernard M. Gordon Prize?

Answer: To honor leaders in academia for developing new educational approaches to engineering.

The Bernard M. Gordon Prize specifically recognizes academic leaders for their innovative development of new educational approaches within the field of engineering.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the Bernard M. Gordon Prize, and how is its $500,000 award distributed?: The Bernard M. Gordon Prize, established in 2001 and named after Analogic Corporation founder Bernard Marshall Gordon, recognizes leaders in academia for developing new educational approaches to engineering. The $500,000 award is split, with $250,000 going to the recipient personally and $250,000 to their institution for ongoing support of academic development.

What type of achievement does the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize recognize?

Answer: A bioengineering achievement that has significantly impacted society.

The Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize is awarded for a bioengineering achievement that has demonstrably and significantly impacted society and advanced the human condition through widespread application.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize awarded for, and when was it established?: The Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize was established by the NAE in October 1999 and is given biennially in odd years since 2001. Named after Fritz Russ and his wife Dolores Russ, it recognizes a bioengineering achievement that has significantly impacted society and advanced the human condition through widespread use, honoring an Ohio University alumnus.

Who is the Charles Stark Draper Prize named after?

Answer: A prominent aerospace engineer known as the 'father of inertial navigation.'

The Charles Stark Draper Prize is named in honor of Charles S. Draper, a distinguished MIT professor and aerospace engineer widely recognized as the 'father of inertial navigation.'

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Charles Stark Draper Prize awarded for, and who is it named after?: The NAE annually awards the Charles Stark Draper Prize for the advancement of engineering and the education of the public about engineering. The recipient receives $500,000. The prize is named for Charles S. Draper, known as the 'father of inertial navigation,' an MIT professor and founder of the Draper Laboratory.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy