Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



New Jersey's 33rd Legislative District: Demographics and Political History

At a Glance

Title: New Jersey's 33rd Legislative District: Demographics and Political History

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • District Composition and Geography: 3 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Demographic Profile (2020 Census): 7 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Voter Registration and Political Landscape: 5 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Historical Senate Representation: 18 flashcards, 22 questions
  • Historical General Assembly Representation: 14 flashcards, 12 questions
  • District Evolution and Apportionment: 6 flashcards, 5 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 53
  • True/False Questions: 28
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 31
  • Total Questions: 59

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about New Jersey's 33rd Legislative District: Demographics and Political History

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "New Jersey's 33rd legislative district" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: New Jersey's 33rd Legislative District: Demographics and Political History

Study Guide: New Jersey's 33rd Legislative District: Demographics and Political History

District Composition and Geography

The 33rd legislative district of New Jersey is located entirely within Hudson County.

Answer: True

The 33rd legislative district is geographically situated entirely within Hudson County, encompassing specific municipalities therein.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific municipalities in Hudson County are included in New Jersey's 33rd legislative district?: New Jersey's 33rd legislative district encompasses the Hudson County municipalities of Guttenberg, North Bergen, Secaucus, Union City, Weehawken, and West New York.

The 33rd legislative district is characterized by low population density compared to other New Jersey districts.

Answer: False

The source indicates that the 33rd legislative district is the most densely populated district in New Jersey, contradicting the assertion of low population density.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the 33rd legislative district compare to other districts in New Jersey in terms of density and foreign-born population?: The 33rd legislative district is noted as being the smallest and most densely populated district in the state. It also has the highest percentage of foreign-born residents compared to any other district.

The 33rd legislative district is part of New Jersey's 10th congressional district.

Answer: False

The 33rd legislative district is entirely contained within New Jersey's 8th congressional district, not the 10th.

Related Concepts:

  • Which U.S. Congressional district does New Jersey's 33rd legislative district fall within?: The 33rd legislative district is entirely contained within New Jersey's 8th congressional district.

Which Hudson County municipalities are included in New Jersey's 33rd legislative district?

Answer: Guttenberg, North Bergen, Secaucus, Union City, Weehawken, and West New York

New Jersey's 33rd legislative district encompasses the Hudson County municipalities of Guttenberg, North Bergen, Secaucus, Union City, Weehawken, and West New York.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific municipalities in Hudson County are included in New Jersey's 33rd legislative district?: New Jersey's 33rd legislative district encompasses the Hudson County municipalities of Guttenberg, North Bergen, Secaucus, Union City, Weehawken, and West New York.

Which of the following best describes the 33rd legislative district's population density and foreign-born population status compared to other New Jersey districts?

Answer: It is the smallest and most densely populated district with the highest percentage of foreign-born residents.

The 33rd legislative district is characterized as the smallest and most densely populated district in New Jersey, also having the highest percentage of foreign-born residents.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the 33rd legislative district compare to other districts in New Jersey in terms of density and foreign-born population?: The 33rd legislative district is noted as being the smallest and most densely populated district in the state. It also has the highest percentage of foreign-born residents compared to any other district.

Which U.S. Congressional district does New Jersey's 33rd legislative district fall within?

Answer: 8th Congressional District

The 33rd legislative district is entirely contained within New Jersey's 8th congressional district.

Related Concepts:

  • Which U.S. Congressional district does New Jersey's 33rd legislative district fall within?: The 33rd legislative district is entirely contained within New Jersey's 8th congressional district.

Demographic Profile (2020 Census)

In 2020, the 33rd legislative district had a population of over 250,000 residents.

Answer: False

According to the 2020 United States Census, the 33rd legislative district had a total population of 249,706 residents, which is not over 250,000.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the 2020 United States Census, what was the total population of the 33rd legislative district?: As per the 2020 United States Census, the 33rd legislative district had a total population of 249,706 residents.

The majority of the 33rd legislative district's population was of voting age in 2020.

Answer: True

In 2020, 81.7% of the district's population, totaling 203,973 individuals, was of voting age, indicating a majority.

Related Concepts:

  • What percentage of the 33rd legislative district's population was of voting age in 2020?: In 2020, 81.7% of the district's population, totaling 203,973 individuals, was of voting age.

According to the 2020 census, the 33rd legislative district had a higher percentage of Asian residents than Hispanic or Latino residents.

Answer: False

The 2020 census data shows that 17.7% of the district's population identified as Asian, while 39.9% identified as Hispanic or Latino, meaning the Hispanic or Latino percentage was higher.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the racial and ethnic composition of the 33rd legislative district according to the 2020 census?: The 2020 census data for the 33rd district showed the following racial and ethnic breakdown: 40.2% White, 5.4% Black or African American, 1.0% Native American, 17.7% Asian, 0.1% Pacific Islander, 21.5% from some other race, and 14.1% from two or more races. Additionally, 39.9% of the population identified as Hispanic or Latino.

According to the 2020 United States Census, what was the total population of the 33rd legislative district?

Answer: 249,706

As per the 2020 United States Census, the 33rd legislative district had a total population of 249,706 residents.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the 2020 United States Census, what was the total population of the 33rd legislative district?: As per the 2020 United States Census, the 33rd legislative district had a total population of 249,706 residents.

What percentage of the 33rd legislative district's population was of voting age in 2020?

Answer: 81.7%

In 2020, 81.7% of the district's population was of voting age.

Related Concepts:

  • What percentage of the 33rd legislative district's population was of voting age in 2020?: In 2020, 81.7% of the district's population, totaling 203,973 individuals, was of voting age.

Based on the 2020 census, which racial or ethnic group constituted the largest portion of the 33rd legislative district's population?

Answer: Hispanic or Latino

The 2020 census data indicates that 39.9% of the population in the 33rd legislative district identified as Hispanic or Latino, which was the largest reported group.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the racial and ethnic composition of the 33rd legislative district according to the 2020 census?: The 2020 census data for the 33rd district showed the following racial and ethnic breakdown: 40.2% White, 5.4% Black or African American, 1.0% Native American, 17.7% Asian, 0.1% Pacific Islander, 21.5% from some other race, and 14.1% from two or more races. Additionally, 39.9% of the population identified as Hispanic or Latino.

According to the 2020 census, what percentage of the 33rd legislative district's population identified as Asian?

Answer: 17.7%

The 2020 United States Census reported that 17.7% of the population in the 33rd legislative district identified as Asian.

Related Concepts:

  • What percentage of the 33rd district's population identified as Asian in the 2020 census?: According to the 2020 United States Census, 17.7% of the population in the 33rd legislative district identified as Asian.

Which of the following statements accurately reflects the 2020 census data for the 33rd legislative district?

Answer: The percentage of Black residents was higher than the percentage of Native American residents.

The 2020 census data for the 33rd district shows 5.4% Black or African American residents and 1.0% Native American residents, meaning the Black population percentage was higher. The Asian population was 17.7%, 'some other race' was 21.5%, and Hispanic or Latino was 39.9%. Pacific Islander percentage was 0.1%.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the percentage of the population identifying as White in the 33rd district according to the 2020 census?: The 2020 United States Census reported that 40.2% of the population in the 33rd legislative district identified as White.
  • What was the racial and ethnic composition of the 33rd legislative district according to the 2020 census?: The 2020 census data for the 33rd district showed the following racial and ethnic breakdown: 40.2% White, 5.4% Black or African American, 1.0% Native American, 17.7% Asian, 0.1% Pacific Islander, 21.5% from some other race, and 14.1% from two or more races. Additionally, 39.9% of the population identified as Hispanic or Latino.
  • What was the percentage of the population identifying as Hispanic or Latino in the 33rd district in the 2020 census?: The 2020 census data indicates that 39.9% of the population in the 33rd legislative district identified as Hispanic or Latino.

Voter Registration and Political Landscape

As of December 1, 2023, the majority of registered voters in the 33rd district were unaffiliated with any party.

Answer: False

As of December 1, 2023, unaffiliated voters constituted 32.4% of the registered voters in the 33rd district, while Democrats represented 55.4%, meaning Democrats formed the majority.

Related Concepts:

  • As of December 1, 2023, what was the partisan registration breakdown for voters in the 33rd legislative district?: As of December 1, 2023, voter registration in the 33rd district was 55.4% Democratic, 11.6% Republican, and 32.4% unaffiliated, with 1.2% registered to other parties.

The 33rd district has historically been a reliably Republican-leaning district.

Answer: False

The 33rd district has historically been reliably Democratic for many decades, although there was a notable exception in the 1985 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the general political leaning of the 33rd legislative district, and were there any notable exceptions?: The 33rd district has historically been reliably Democratic for many decades. However, there was a brief period in the 1985 elections when two Republicans won seats in the General Assembly, capitalizing on the statewide success of Governor Thomas Kean.

As of December 1, 2023, the percentage of registered Democrats in the 33rd district was slightly lower than the percentage of unaffiliated voters.

Answer: False

As of December 1, 2023, the percentage of registered Democrats (55.4%) in the 33rd district was higher than the percentage of unaffiliated voters (32.4%).

Related Concepts:

  • As of December 1, 2023, what was the partisan registration breakdown for voters in the 33rd legislative district?: As of December 1, 2023, voter registration in the 33rd district was 55.4% Democratic, 11.6% Republican, and 32.4% unaffiliated, with 1.2% registered to other parties.

As of December 1, 2023, what was the approximate percentage of unaffiliated voters in the 33rd legislative district?

Answer: 32.4%

As of December 1, 2023, 32.4% of the registered voters in the 33rd legislative district were unaffiliated with any political party.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the percentage of unaffiliated voters in the 33rd legislative district as of December 2023?: As of December 1, 2023, 32.4% of the registered voters in the 33rd legislative district were unaffiliated with any political party.

The 33rd district has historically been reliably Democratic, but which notable exception occurred in the 1985 elections?

Answer: Two Republicans won seats in the General Assembly.

In the 1985 elections, the 33rd district saw two Republicans, Jose Arango and Ronald Dario, win seats in the General Assembly, which was a notable exception to its usual Democratic leaning.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the general political leaning of the 33rd legislative district, and were there any notable exceptions?: The 33rd district has historically been reliably Democratic for many decades. However, there was a brief period in the 1985 elections when two Republicans won seats in the General Assembly, capitalizing on the statewide success of Governor Thomas Kean.
  • Who were the Republican representatives elected to the General Assembly from the 33rd district in 1985?: In the 1985 elections, Jose Arango of West New York and Ronald Dario of Union City were elected to the General Assembly, defeating the incumbent Democrats Robert Ranieri and newcomer Mario R. Hernandez.

As of December 1, 2023, what was the percentage of registered voters affiliated with the Democratic Party in the 33rd legislative district?

Answer: 55.4%

As of December 1, 2023, 55.4% of the registered voters in New Jersey's 33rd legislative district were affiliated with the Democratic Party.

Related Concepts:

  • As of December 1, 2023, what was the partisan registration breakdown for voters in the 33rd legislative district?: As of December 1, 2023, voter registration in the 33rd district was 55.4% Democratic, 11.6% Republican, and 32.4% unaffiliated, with 1.2% registered to other parties.

Historical Senate Representation

Brian P. Stack is the current State Senator for New Jersey's 33rd legislative district.

Answer: True

Brian P. Stack currently serves as the State Senator for New Jersey's 33rd legislative district.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is the current State Senator representing New Jersey's 33rd legislative district?: The current State Senator for New Jersey's 33rd legislative district is Brian P. Stack, who is a member of the Democratic Party.

Bob Menendez was elected to the State Senate for the 33rd district in January 1991.

Answer: True

Bob Menendez was elevated to fill the Senate vacancy in January 1991 following the death of incumbent Senator Christopher Jackman.

Related Concepts:

  • What political event led to a change in representation for the 33rd district's Senate seat in early 1991?: Bob Menendez was elevated to fill the Senate vacancy in January 1991 following the death of incumbent Senator Christopher Jackman.

Bernard Kenny was chosen to fill Bob Menendez's Senate vacancy in the 33rd district after Menendez was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in November 1992.

Answer: True

Following Bob Menendez's election to the U.S. House of Representatives in November 1992, Bernard Kenny was selected to fill his vacant Senate seat in the 33rd district.

Related Concepts:

  • Who succeeded Bernard Kenny in the New Jersey Senate for the 33rd district after Kenny moved to the Senate in 1993?: Following Bernard Kenny's move to the Senate in 1993, Rudy Garcia was chosen to fill his vacant Assembly seat in the 33rd district.

Rafael Fraguela ran as a Democratic candidate for the Senate in 2003 after being removed from the Democratic ballot.

Answer: False

In 2003, Rafael Fraguela was removed from the Democratic ballot and subsequently ran for the Senate as a Republican candidate.

Related Concepts:

  • What political shift did Assemblymember Rafael Fraguela make in 2003 concerning the 33rd district?: In 2003, Rafael Fraguela was removed from the Democratic ballot by the Hudson County Democratic Party and subsequently ran for the Senate as a Republican, stating that the Democrats were sidelining Hispanic candidates while the GOP was more welcoming.

Brian P. Stack won the 2017 State Senate election with over 88% of the vote.

Answer: True

Brian P. Stack secured victory in the 2017 State Senate election for the 33rd district with 88.2% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Brian P. Stack perform in the 2017 State Senate election for the 33rd district?: Brian P. Stack won the 2017 State Senate election for the 33rd district with 36,594 votes (88.2%), defeating Republican candidate Beth Hamburger, who received 4,887 votes (11.8%).

In the 2013 State Senate election, Brian P. Stack received approximately 80% of the vote.

Answer: True

Brian P. Stack won the 2013 State Senate election for the 33rd district with 80.7% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • Who represented the 33rd district in the State Senate in the 2013 election, and what were the vote percentages?: Brian P. Stack represented the 33rd district in the State Senate in the 2013 election, winning with 26,980 votes, which constituted 80.7% of the total. His opponent, James Sanford, received 6,460 votes (19.3%).

The 2011 State Senate election in the 33rd district saw a close race between the Democratic and Republican candidates.

Answer: False

The 2011 State Senate election in the 33rd district was not a close race; Brian P. Stack won with 86.6% of the vote, while the Republican candidate received 13.4%.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the results of the 2011 State Senate election in the 33rd district?: In the 2011 State Senate election for the 33rd district, Brian P. Stack (D) secured victory with 20,223 votes (86.6%), while Republican candidate Beth Hamburger received 3,136 votes (13.4%).

Christopher J. Jackman won the 1987 State Senate election in the 33rd district against a Republican opponent named Ronald Dario.

Answer: True

Christopher J. Jackman won the 1987 State Senate election for the 33rd district, defeating Republican candidate Ronald Dario.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the 1987 State Senate election in the 33rd district?: In the 1987 State Senate election for the 33rd district, Christopher J. Jackman (D) won with 19,944 votes (60.6%), defeating Republican Ronald Dario, who received 12,668 votes (38.5%).

William V. Musto received less than 50% of the vote in the 1981 State Senate election for the 33rd district.

Answer: False

William V. Musto won the 1981 State Senate election for the 33rd district with 62.0% of the vote, exceeding 50%.

Related Concepts:

  • How did William V. Musto perform in the 1981 State Senate election for the 33rd district?: William V. Musto, the Democratic candidate, won the 1981 State Senate election in the 33rd district with 24,012 votes (62.0%), while Republican Ralph A. Montanez received 14,707 votes (38.0%).

In the 1977 State Senate election, William V. Musto (D) secured over 70% of the vote.

Answer: True

William V. Musto was elected State Senator for the 33rd district in 1977, receiving 71.8% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result of the 1977 State Senate election in the 33rd district?: William V. Musto (D) was elected State Senator for the 33rd district in 1977, garnering 25,270 votes (71.8%). His opponent, Michael A. Litzas (R), received 7,244 votes (20.6%).

Who currently serves as the State Senator for New Jersey's 33rd legislative district?

Answer: Brian P. Stack

Brian P. Stack currently holds the position of State Senator for New Jersey's 33rd legislative district.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is the current State Senator representing New Jersey's 33rd legislative district?: The current State Senator for New Jersey's 33rd legislative district is Brian P. Stack, who is a member of the Democratic Party.

Who was elevated to fill the Senate vacancy in the 33rd district in January 1991 following the death of incumbent Senator Christopher Jackman?

Answer: Bob Menendez

Bob Menendez was elevated to fill the Senate vacancy in January 1991 after the passing of Senator Christopher Jackman.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the Senator for the 33rd district who passed away in January 1991?: Christopher Jackman was the Senator for the 33rd district who passed away in January 1991.
  • What political event led to a change in representation for the 33rd district's Senate seat in early 1991?: Bob Menendez was elevated to fill the Senate vacancy in January 1991 following the death of incumbent Senator Christopher Jackman.

After Bob Menendez was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, who was chosen to fill his vacant Senate seat in the 33rd district?

Answer: Bernard Kenny

Bernard Kenny was chosen to fill the Senate seat in the 33rd district after Bob Menendez was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in November 1992.

Related Concepts:

  • What political event led to a change in representation for the 33rd district's Senate seat in early 1991?: Bob Menendez was elevated to fill the Senate vacancy in January 1991 following the death of incumbent Senator Christopher Jackman.
  • Who succeeded Bernard Kenny in the New Jersey Senate for the 33rd district after Kenny moved to the Senate in 1993?: Following Bernard Kenny's move to the Senate in 1993, Rudy Garcia was chosen to fill his vacant Assembly seat in the 33rd district.

What political shift did Rafael Fraguela make in 2003 regarding his party affiliation for running in the 33rd district?

Answer: He ran as a Republican after being removed from the Democratic ballot.

In 2003, Rafael Fraguela was removed from the Democratic ballot and subsequently ran for the Senate as a Republican.

Related Concepts:

  • What political shift did Assemblymember Rafael Fraguela make in 2003 concerning the 33rd district?: In 2003, Rafael Fraguela was removed from the Democratic ballot by the Hudson County Democratic Party and subsequently ran for the Senate as a Republican, stating that the Democrats were sidelining Hispanic candidates while the GOP was more welcoming.

Brian P. Stack won the 2017 State Senate election for the 33rd district with what approximate percentage of the vote?

Answer: 88.2%

Brian P. Stack won the 2017 State Senate election for the 33rd district with approximately 88.2% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Brian P. Stack perform in the 2017 State Senate election for the 33rd district?: Brian P. Stack won the 2017 State Senate election for the 33rd district with 36,594 votes (88.2%), defeating Republican candidate Beth Hamburger, who received 4,887 votes (11.8%).

During the 1990s, who served as Senator for the 33rd district, having initially been elected to the Assembly in 1988?

Answer: Bernard Kenny

Bernard Kenny served as Senator for the 33rd district during the 1990s, having been initially elected to the Assembly in 1988 and moving to the Senate in 1993.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the Democratic Senators elected in the 33rd district in the 1990s?: During the 1990s, Bernard Kenny served as Senator for the 33rd district, initially elected to the Assembly in 1988 and then moving to the Senate in 1993. Bob Menendez also served as Senator from 1991 until his election to Congress in late 1992.

In the 1987 State Senate election for the 33rd district, who was the Republican opponent defeated by Christopher J. Jackman?

Answer: Ronald Dario

Christopher J. Jackman defeated Republican opponent Ronald Dario in the 1987 State Senate election for the 33rd district.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the 1987 State Senate election in the 33rd district?: In the 1987 State Senate election for the 33rd district, Christopher J. Jackman (D) won with 19,944 votes (60.6%), defeating Republican Ronald Dario, who received 12,668 votes (38.5%).

William V. Musto won the 1981 State Senate election in the 33rd district with what percentage of the vote?

Answer: 62.0%

William V. Musto won the 1981 State Senate election in the 33rd district with 62.0% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • How did William V. Musto perform in the 1981 State Senate election for the 33rd district?: William V. Musto, the Democratic candidate, won the 1981 State Senate election in the 33rd district with 24,012 votes (62.0%), while Republican Ralph A. Montanez received 14,707 votes (38.0%).

What was the result for the Republican candidate in the 1977 State Senate election for the 33rd district?

Answer: Michael A. Litzas received 20.6% of the vote.

In the 1977 State Senate election for the 33rd district, the Republican candidate Michael A. Litzas received 20.6% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result of the 1977 State Senate election in the 33rd district?: William V. Musto (D) was elected State Senator for the 33rd district in 1977, garnering 25,270 votes (71.8%). His opponent, Michael A. Litzas (R), received 7,244 votes (20.6%).

Who was the Senator for the 33rd district who passed away in January 1991?

Answer: Christopher Jackman

Christopher Jackman was the Senator for the 33rd district who passed away in January 1991.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the Senator for the 33rd district who passed away in January 1991?: Christopher Jackman was the Senator for the 33rd district who passed away in January 1991.

In the 2021 New Jersey general election for the State Senate in the 33rd district, how many votes did the Democratic candidate Brian P. Stack receive?

Answer: 37,059

In the 2021 general election for the State Senate in the 33rd district, Democratic candidate Brian P. Stack received 37,059 votes.

Related Concepts:

  • Who won the Senate seat in the 33rd district during the 2021 New Jersey general election?: Brian P. Stack, representing the Democratic Party, won the Senate seat in the 33rd district during the 2021 New Jersey general election, receiving 37,059 votes (85.1%) against Republican candidate Agha Khan.

What was the percentage of the vote for the Democratic candidate in the 1973 State Senate election for the 33rd district?

Answer: 78.0%

In the 1973 State Senate election for the 33rd district, the Democratic candidate received 78.0% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the percentage of the vote for the Democratic candidate in the 1973 State Senate election for the 33rd district?: In the 1973 New Jersey general election for the State Senate in the 33rd district, the Democratic candidate William V. Musto received 78.0% of the vote.

Historical General Assembly Representation

Julio Marenco and Gabe Rodriguez are the current State Senators for the 33rd legislative district.

Answer: False

Julio Marenco and Gabe Rodriguez currently serve as members of the New Jersey General Assembly for the 33rd legislative district, not as State Senators.

Related Concepts:

  • Who are the current members of the New Jersey General Assembly for the 33rd legislative district?: The current members of the New Jersey General Assembly representing the 33rd legislative district are Julio Marenco and Gabe Rodriguez, both affiliated with the Democratic Party.

In the June 1999 primaries, incumbent Louis Romano was endorsed by the Hudson County Democratic Party.

Answer: False

In the June 1999 primaries, incumbent Assemblyman Louis Romano was not endorsed by the Hudson County Democratic Party; the party organization endorsed West New York mayor Albio Sires instead, and Romano lost his bid for re-election.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to incumbent Assemblyman Louis Romano in the June 1999 primaries for the 33rd district?: In the June 1999 primaries, Louis Romano, a four-term incumbent, lost his bid for re-election after the Hudson County Democratic Party organization endorsed West New York mayor Albio Sires.

Annette Chaparro and Raj Mukherji were elected to the General Assembly in the 33rd district in 2015.

Answer: True

Annette Chaparro and Raj Mukherji, both Democrats, were elected to the General Assembly seats for the 33rd district in the 2015 election.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the 2015 General Assembly election for the 33rd district?: In the 2015 General Assembly election for the 33rd district, Democratic candidates Annette Chaparro and Raj Mukherji were elected, receiving 12,338 votes (39.6%) and 11,978 votes (38.5%) respectively. They defeated Republican candidates Garrett P. Simulcik Jr. and Javier Sosa.

In the 2013 General Assembly election, Carmelo G. Garcia and Raj Mukherji won their seats.

Answer: True

Carmelo G. Garcia and Raj Mukherji, running as Democratic candidates, won the General Assembly seats for the 33rd district in the 2013 election.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the winning candidates for the General Assembly in the 33rd district in the 2013 election?: The Democratic candidates Carmelo G. Garcia and Raj Mukherji won the General Assembly seats for the 33rd district in the 2013 election, with Garcia receiving 20,681 votes (37.5%) and Mukherji receiving 19,029 votes (34.5%).

Ruben J. Ramos, Jr. and Sean Connors were the Republican candidates elected to the General Assembly in the 33rd district in 2011.

Answer: False

Ruben J. Ramos, Jr. and Sean Connors were elected as Democratic candidates to the General Assembly in the 33rd district in 2011.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the results for the General Assembly seats in the 33rd district in the 2011 election?: In the 2011 General Assembly election for the 33rd district, the Democratic candidates Ruben J. Ramos, Jr. and Sean Connors were elected, securing 17,444 votes (42.7%) and 17,064 votes (41.8%) respectively.

Thomas A. Gallo and Christopher J. Jackman were elected to the General Assembly in the 33rd district in the 1973 election.

Answer: True

In the 1973 New Jersey general election, the Democratic candidates Thomas A. Gallo and Christopher J. Jackman were elected to the General Assembly for the 33rd district.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the Democratic Assembly members elected in the 33rd district in the 1973 general election?: In the 1973 New Jersey general election, the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly for the 33rd district were Thomas A. Gallo and Christopher J. Jackman.

Who were the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly in the 33rd district in the 2019 election?

Answer: Raj Mukherji and Annette Chaparro

In the 2019 election, Raj Mukherji and Annette Chaparro were the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly seats for the 33rd district.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly in the 33rd district in the 2019 election?: In the 2019 New Jersey general election for the 33rd district's General Assembly seats, the Democratic candidates elected were Raj Mukherji with 24,416 votes (42.4%) and Annette Chaparro with 24,366 votes (42.3%).

In the 2013 General Assembly election for the 33rd district, which two Democratic candidates were elected?

Answer: Carmelo G. Garcia and Raj Mukherji

Carmelo G. Garcia and Raj Mukherji were the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly for the 33rd district in the 2013 election.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the winning candidates for the General Assembly in the 33rd district in the 2013 election?: The Democratic candidates Carmelo G. Garcia and Raj Mukherji won the General Assembly seats for the 33rd district in the 2013 election, with Garcia receiving 20,681 votes (37.5%) and Mukherji receiving 19,029 votes (34.5%).

Which of the following pairs represented the 33rd district in the General Assembly following the 2011 election?

Answer: Ruben J. Ramos, Jr. and Sean Connors

Ruben J. Ramos, Jr. and Sean Connors represented the 33rd district in the General Assembly following their election in 2011.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the results for the General Assembly seats in the 33rd district in the 2011 election?: In the 2011 General Assembly election for the 33rd district, the Democratic candidates Ruben J. Ramos, Jr. and Sean Connors were elected, securing 17,444 votes (42.7%) and 17,064 votes (41.8%) respectively.

Who were the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly for the 33rd district in the 1973 New Jersey general election?

Answer: Thomas A. Gallo and Christopher J. Jackman

Thomas A. Gallo and Christopher J. Jackman were the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly for the 33rd district in the 1973 New Jersey general election.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the Democratic Assembly members elected in the 33rd district in the 1973 general election?: In the 1973 New Jersey general election, the Democratic candidates elected to the General Assembly for the 33rd district were Thomas A. Gallo and Christopher J. Jackman.

What was the total number of votes cast for the General Assembly seats in the 33rd district during the 2019 election?

Answer: 57,600

In the 2019 New Jersey general election for the 33rd district's General Assembly seats, a total of 57,600 votes were cast.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total number of votes cast for the General Assembly in the 33rd district during the 2019 election?: In the 2019 New Jersey general election for the 33rd district's General Assembly seats, a total of 57,600 votes were cast.

Who were the incumbent Assembly members in the 33rd district who were succeeded by Julio Marenco and Gabe Rodriguez after the 2021 apportionment?

Answer: Raj Mukherji and Annette Chaparro

Raj Mukherji was running for the Senate, and Annette Chaparro was stepping down, leading to Julio Marenco and Gabe Rodriguez succeeding them as Assembly members in the 33rd district after the 2021 apportionment.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the incumbent Assembly members from the 33rd district who were succeeded by Julio Marenco and Gabe Rodriguez after the 2021 apportionment?: Assemblymember Raj Mukherji was running for the Senate, and Assemblymember Annette Chaparro was stepping down after losing party support, leading to the selection of Julio Marenco and Gabe Rodriguez as successors in the 33rd district.

District Evolution and Apportionment

Since its creation in 1973, the 33rd district's geographic composition has changed significantly in every reapportionment cycle.

Answer: False

Since its creation in 1973, the 33rd district has consistently comprised most of the municipalities in North Hudson situated along the Hudson River, indicating a degree of geographic stability rather than significant change in every cycle.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the consistent geographic characteristic of the 33rd legislative district since its creation in 1973?: Since its establishment in 1973 as part of the 40-district legislative map, the 33rd district has consistently comprised most of the municipalities in North Hudson situated along the Hudson River.

Between 1973 and 2011, the 33rd district included all of Hoboken and a portion of Jersey City.

Answer: True

From 1973 until 2011, the 33rd legislative district encompassed all of Hoboken, Union City, Weehawken, West New York, and Guttenberg, along with a portion of Jersey City.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the composition of the 33rd legislative district change between 1973 and 2011?: From 1973 until 2011, the 33rd district included all of Hoboken, Union City, Weehawken, West New York, and Guttenberg, along with a portion of Jersey City. Adjustments were made to Jersey City's wards to maintain population parity.

In the 2011 apportionment, Guttenberg and West New York were added to the 33rd legislative district.

Answer: False

During the 2011 apportionment, Guttenberg and West New York were shifted out of the 33rd legislative district and into the 32nd legislative district.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific changes occurred to the 33rd district's municipal composition in the 2011 apportionment?: In the 2011 apportionment, Guttenberg and West New York, which had been part of the district since 1973, were shifted to the 32nd legislative district.
  • Which specific municipalities were shifted to the 32nd district from the 33rd district in the 2011 apportionment?: Guttenberg and West New York were shifted from the 33rd legislative district to the 32nd legislative district in the 2011 apportionment.
  • Which two municipalities were shifted to the 32nd district from the 33rd district in the 2011 apportionment?: Guttenberg and West New York were shifted from the 33rd legislative district to the 32nd legislative district in the 2011 apportionment.

What has been a consistent geographic characteristic of the 33rd legislative district since its creation in 1973?

Answer: It has consistently comprised most of the municipalities in North Hudson situated along the Hudson River.

Since its establishment in 1973, the 33rd district has consistently included most of the municipalities in North Hudson located along the Hudson River.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the consistent geographic characteristic of the 33rd legislative district since its creation in 1973?: Since its establishment in 1973 as part of the 40-district legislative map, the 33rd district has consistently comprised most of the municipalities in North Hudson situated along the Hudson River.

Which municipalities were shifted *out* of the 33rd district during the 2011 apportionment?

Answer: Guttenberg and West New York

During the 2011 apportionment process, Guttenberg and West New York were shifted from the 33rd legislative district to the 32nd legislative district.

Related Concepts:

  • Which specific municipalities were shifted to the 32nd district from the 33rd district in the 2011 apportionment?: Guttenberg and West New York were shifted from the 33rd legislative district to the 32nd legislative district in the 2011 apportionment.
  • Which two municipalities were shifted to the 32nd district from the 33rd district in the 2011 apportionment?: Guttenberg and West New York were shifted from the 33rd legislative district to the 32nd legislative district in the 2011 apportionment.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy