Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
The No Child Left Behind Act was enacted into law in 2001, shortly after its proposal.
Answer: False
The No Child Left Behind Act was signed into law on January 8, 2002, following legislative debate and passage in late 2001 and early 2002.
NCLB reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), updating its Title I provisions.
Answer: True
The No Child Left Behind Act served as a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, significantly amending and expanding its provisions, particularly Title I, which focuses on resources for disadvantaged students.
The long title of the No Child Left Behind Act emphasized closing achievement gaps through accountability, flexibility, and choice.
Answer: True
The full title of the act, "An Act to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind," explicitly states these core objectives.
The 1983 report "A Nation at Risk" expressed satisfaction with the state of the American education system and called for maintaining the status quo.
Answer: False
The "A Nation at Risk" report famously declared that the American education system was facing a "rising tide of mediocrity" and called for significant reforms to improve academic standards and national competitiveness.
International trends in education policy, particularly the focus on learning outcomes and evaluation, did not influence the NCLB Act.
Answer: False
Global movements emphasizing standardized testing, accountability, and measurable learning outcomes, particularly evident in international organizations' reports, significantly influenced the policy direction leading to NCLB.
A key goal of NCLB, according to the Department of Education, was to increase school accountability for student outcomes and reduce achievement disparities.
Answer: True
The Department of Education articulated that NCLB aimed to hold schools accountable for student performance and to systematically address and reduce the persistent achievement gaps among various student subgroups.
The No Child Left Behind Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush.
Answer: True
President George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act into law on January 8, 2002.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was originally signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965.
Answer: True
The foundational Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which NCLB later reauthorized, was a key piece of President Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society legislation, signed into law in 1965.
The core premise of NCLB was that setting high standards and measurable goals could lead to improved individual results in education.
Answer: True
NCLB was built upon the principle that establishing clear, high standards and using measurable goals and assessments would drive improvements in student achievement and educational outcomes.
What was the central objective of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001?
Answer: To improve student outcomes through standards-based reform, accountability, and closing achievement gaps.
The primary aim of the No Child Left Behind Act was to enhance educational outcomes by implementing standards-based reforms, ensuring accountability for schools, and actively working to close achievement gaps among diverse student populations.
According to the provided text, when was the No Child Left Behind Act officially enacted into law?
Answer: January 8, 2002
The No Child Left Behind Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002.
Which foundational federal legislation did the No Child Left Behind Act reauthorize?
Answer: The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
The No Child Left Behind Act served as a reauthorization and significant amendment of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965.
Which of the following phrases best represents the long title of the No Child Left Behind Act?
Answer: An act to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice.
The long title of the No Child Left Behind Act explicitly stated its goals: 'An Act to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind.'
The 1983 report "A Nation at Risk" played a role in the educational reform movement leading to NCLB by:
Answer: Highlighting concerns about declining educational standards and their threat to national security.
"A Nation at Risk" served as a catalyst for educational reform by warning of the dire consequences of perceived declining academic standards for the nation's economic competitiveness and security.
How did international educational trends influence NCLB?
Answer: They encouraged a focus on standardized testing and accountability, similar to global movements.
The global emphasis on learning outcomes and accountability, promoted by international bodies, influenced NCLB's focus on standardized testing and measurable performance standards.
According to the Department of Education, what was a primary aim of the No Child Left Behind Act?
Answer: To increase school accountability for student outcomes and reduce achievement disparities.
The Department of Education articulated that NCLB's core objectives included enhancing school accountability for student performance and actively working to diminish achievement gaps.
The common acronym for the No Child Left Behind Act is 'NCBLA'.
Answer: False
The widely recognized and commonly used acronym for the No Child Left Behind Act is 'NCLB'.
The NCLB Act required annual standardized testing for students in federally funded public schools across all grade levels.
Answer: False
NCLB mandated annual standardized testing in reading and mathematics for students in grades 3 through 8 and once in high school, not across all grade levels.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under NCLB required schools to show annual improvement in student test scores for all students and specific subgroups.
Answer: True
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) was a central metric under NCLB, necessitating that schools demonstrate continuous annual improvement in the academic performance of all students and specific demographic subgroups.
Schools failing to meet AYP targets under NCLB faced progressively stricter sanctions, including potential restructuring or closure.
Answer: True
Schools that repeatedly failed to meet AYP targets were subject to a series of escalating sanctions, ranging from requiring improvement plans and offering school choice to implementing corrective actions and ultimately considering restructuring or closure.
NCLB required states to set objectives for student achievement, but these objectives did not need to be reported separately for different student subgroups.
Answer: False
A core requirement of NCLB was that states report assessment results and AYP status separately for various student subgroups, including economically disadvantaged students, students with disabilities, and English language learners, to ensure accountability for all populations.
The ultimate proficiency goal for NCLB was for all students to reach proficiency in reading and mathematics by the 2013-2014 school year.
Answer: True
The No Child Left Behind Act established an ambitious target for all students to achieve proficiency in reading and mathematics by the end of the 2013-2014 academic year.
NCLB defined 'highly qualified' teachers strictly as those holding a Ph.D. in their subject area.
Answer: False
NCLB required states to define 'highly qualified' teachers, typically involving a bachelor's degree, full state certification, and demonstrated subject matter competency. A Ph.D. was not a universal requirement, and states had flexibility in defining these standards, especially for existing teachers.
The 'safe harbor' provision allowed schools to be exempt from AYP requirements if they showed improvement in teacher qualifications.
Answer: False
The 'safe harbor' provision allowed schools to meet AYP targets if a specific subgroup did not meet the standard, provided that the subgroup showed demonstrated improvement and the school met other criteria, such as high graduation rates. It was not directly tied to teacher qualifications.
NCLB mandated that educational programs be based on 'scientifically based research,' defined as rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures.
Answer: True
The act stipulated that educational interventions and programs should be grounded in 'scientifically based research,' which it defined as employing rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures to yield reliable and valid knowledge.
NCLB required specific attention to the academic achievement of traditionally underserved student populations, including low-income students and students with disabilities.
Answer: True
A central tenet of NCLB was to ensure that the academic progress of historically underserved groups, such as students from low-income families, students with disabilities, and minority students, was monitored and improved.
NCLB's requirements for 'highly qualified' teachers applied only to newly hired educators.
Answer: False
The 'highly qualified' teacher requirements under NCLB applied to all teachers, including existing staff, although states had flexibility in how current teachers could meet these standards.
What does the common acronym 'NCLB' stand for?
Answer: No Child Left Behind
NCLB is the widely recognized acronym for the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
What did the NCLB Act mandate for federally funded public schools concerning student testing?
Answer: Annual standardized tests in specific grade levels.
NCLB mandated annual standardized testing in reading and mathematics for students in grades 3 through 8 and once in high school, not across all subjects or all grade levels.
What was the concept of 'Adequate Yearly Progress' (AYP) under NCLB?
Answer: A requirement for schools to demonstrate annual improvement in student test scores for all students and subgroups.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) was the metric used by NCLB to measure school performance, requiring annual improvement in test scores for all students and specific subgroups.
Which of the following was an escalating consequence for schools repeatedly failing to meet AYP targets under NCLB?
Answer: Labeling as 'In Need of Improvement' with required improvement plans.
Schools failing AYP for two consecutive years were designated as 'In Need of Improvement,' triggering requirements for improvement plans and potentially allowing students to transfer to higher-performing schools.
What was the target year set by NCLB for all students to achieve proficiency in reading and mathematics?
Answer: 2014
The No Child Left Behind Act established an ambitious goal for all students to reach proficiency in reading and mathematics by the end of the 2013-2014 school year.
Regarding teachers, NCLB required that all students be taught by:
Answer: Highly qualified teachers, with states defining specific standards.
NCLB mandated that all teachers be 'highly qualified,' a definition that states were required to establish, generally including a bachelor's degree, full certification, and subject matter competence.
The 'safe harbor' provision within NCLB was significant because it:
Answer: Provided a pathway for subgroups not meeting standards to still be considered proficient under certain criteria.
The 'safe harbor' provision offered an alternative route to meeting AYP by allowing schools to be exempt from sanctions if certain subgroups showed progress, even if they did not meet the absolute proficiency targets.
How did NCLB define 'scientifically based research' for educational programs?
Answer: Research employing rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures yielding reliable knowledge.
NCLB defined 'scientifically based research' as systematic, objective procedures that yield reliable knowledge about educational practices and programs.
Contrary to its stated aims of decentralization, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) significantly increased federal oversight in education through its stringent accountability measures.
Answer: True
While NCLB was presented as a means to return control to states and local districts, its detailed requirements for standardized testing, accountability metrics (like AYP), and reporting mandates represented a substantial increase in federal involvement and oversight in public education.
Initial criticisms of the NCLB proposal focused on its potential to divert funds from struggling schools through voucher programs.
Answer: True
Concerns were raised that the school choice provisions, particularly those involving vouchers, could siphon financial resources away from public schools that were already underfunded and serving high-need populations.
NCLB's focus on standardized testing in core subjects led to an expansion of curriculum time for arts and music education.
Answer: False
A common criticism of NCLB was that its emphasis on tested subjects like reading and mathematics led to a narrowing of the curriculum, often resulting in reduced instructional time for subjects such as arts, music, and social studies.
A major criticism of NCLB was the phenomenon of 'teaching to the test,' where instruction focused narrowly on exam content.
Answer: True
The intense focus on standardized test scores for accountability purposes led many educators to concentrate instruction on the specific content and formats likely to appear on the tests, a practice known as 'teaching to the test'.
NCLB's accountability system recognized schools showing improvement even if they hadn't yet reached the 100% proficiency target for all students.
Answer: False
NCLB's strict AYP requirements meant that schools could be labeled as failing even if they demonstrated significant progress, if they did not meet the absolute 100% proficiency target for all students and subgroups by the deadline.
The goal of 100% student proficiency by 2014 was widely considered realistic and attainable by educational experts.
Answer: False
The goal of universal proficiency by 2014 was widely criticized as unrealistic and unattainable by many educational experts, who cited the inherent variability in student learning capabilities and external factors influencing academic performance.
NCLB's group accountability system was seen as fully compatible with the individualized approach required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Answer: False
Critics argued that NCLB's emphasis on group performance metrics could conflict with IDEA's mandate for individualized education plans (IEPs) and tailored support for students with disabilities, potentially overshadowing individual needs.
Despite criticisms, organizations like the National Council on Disability noted positive impacts of NCLB and IDEA on visibility and expectations for students with disabilities.
Answer: True
The National Council on Disability observed that NCLB and IDEA increased the visibility of students with disabilities within accountability systems, leading to higher expectations and greater administrative attention to their academic progress.
A major criticism of NCLB was the perceived inadequacy of federal funding to support its extensive mandates.
Answer: True
A persistent critique of NCLB was that the federal funding provided did not adequately cover the costs associated with implementing its numerous requirements, such as standardized testing, data collection, and intervention programs.
Senator Ted Kennedy argued that the necessary funds were adequately provided for the reforms outlined in NCLB.
Answer: False
Senator Ted Kennedy, a key sponsor of NCLB, expressed concern that the legislation's ambitious goals were not matched by sufficient federal funding, famously stating that "the tragedy is that these long overdue reforms are finally in place, but the funds are not."
NCLB's requirements placed minimal strain on state education budgets, as federal funding covered all associated costs.
Answer: False
The implementation of NCLB's mandates often required significant state and local expenditures for testing, data systems, and interventions, frequently exceeding the federal funds provided, thus straining education budgets.
NCLB's focus on common expectations for all students showed mixed results regarding the narrowing of racial and ethnic achievement gaps.
Answer: True
While NCLB aimed to close achievement gaps by setting high expectations for all students, research indicates that the impact on narrowing racial and ethnic disparities was varied, with some improvements but persistent challenges.
Under NCLB, states were universally praised for providing native language assessments for English language learners.
Answer: False
While NCLB allowed for native language assessments for English language learners within a three-year window, many states did not provide them, opting instead to test students primarily in English, which drew criticism for potentially underestimating their progress.
A 2006 study found that schools failing AYP in California and Illinois predominantly served white students.
Answer: False
A 2006 study indicated that schools failing to meet AYP in California and Illinois predominantly served minority students, contrasting with schools that met AYP, which had significantly lower percentages of minority students.
The accountability system of NCLB created incentives for schools to manipulate test results or student classifications to avoid sanctions.
Answer: True
The high stakes associated with AYP and sanctions under NCLB led to concerns and documented instances of schools and districts engaging in practices such as manipulating test data or student classifications to meet accountability targets.
Arguments against NCLB suggested that its reliance on standardized testing could lead to a narrowing of the curriculum.
Answer: True
A significant concern raised by critics was that the emphasis on standardized testing for accountability purposes would compel schools to narrow their curriculum, focusing primarily on tested subjects at the expense of other important areas of study.
NCLB mandated that all students achieve proficiency in reading and math by the 2013-2014 school year, a goal considered unrealistic by many.
Answer: True
The 100% proficiency target set by NCLB for all students by 2014 was widely viewed as an unattainable aspiration, given the complexities of student learning and diverse educational contexts.
NCLB's emphasis on standardized testing in reading and mathematics potentially led to a reduction in instructional time for subjects like history and the arts.
Answer: True
The pressure to improve scores on standardized tests in core subjects often resulted in schools allocating less time and resources to non-tested subjects such as history, civics, and the arts, leading to a narrowing of the curriculum.
The 'safe harbor' provision was seen as a precursor to growth-based or value-added assessment models.
Answer: True
The 'safe harbor' provision, which allowed schools to meet AYP targets under certain conditions even if subgroups did not meet absolute proficiency levels, foreshadowed later assessment approaches that focus on measuring student growth over time rather than solely on static proficiency benchmarks.
What was a primary concern raised by critics regarding the initial NCLB proposal concerning school choice?
Answer: It would divert funds from struggling schools to alternative schools via vouchers.
Critics expressed concern that the school choice provisions, particularly voucher programs, could potentially redirect financial resources away from public schools that were already facing significant challenges.
What was a significant criticism regarding NCLB's impact on the curriculum?
Answer: It caused a narrowing of the curriculum due to focus on tested subjects like reading and math.
A major criticism was that NCLB's emphasis on standardized testing in reading and math led schools to reduce instructional time in other subjects, thereby narrowing the overall curriculum.
The phenomenon of 'teaching to the test' under NCLB was criticized because:
Answer: It potentially limited instruction to skills measured by exams, hindering deeper understanding.
'Teaching to the test' was criticized for potentially narrowing pedagogical approaches to focus solely on testable content, which could impede the development of critical thinking and broader conceptual understanding.
How did NCLB's accountability system create challenges for schools showing improvement?
Answer: Schools demonstrating progress could still be labeled 'failing' if they didn't meet the absolute 100% proficiency target.
The stringent AYP requirements meant that schools making significant progress could still be classified as failing if they did not achieve the 100% proficiency benchmark for all students and subgroups, creating a challenging accountability environment.
Arguments that the 100% proficiency goal of NCLB was unrealistic often cited:
Answer: The variability in student potential and learning capabilities.
Critics argued that the goal of universal proficiency was unattainable because it did not adequately account for the natural diversity in student abilities, learning styles, and external factors influencing academic success.
NCLB's focus on group accountability was criticized for potentially conflicting with:
Answer: The individualized approach required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
The emphasis on group performance metrics under NCLB raised concerns about its compatibility with IDEA's mandate for individualized education plans (IEPs) and tailored support for students with disabilities.
What positive impact did NCLB and IDEA have on students with disabilities, according to the National Council on Disability?
Answer: They made the academic progress of these students more visible and prompted greater administrative review.
The National Council on Disability noted that NCLB and IDEA increased the visibility of students with disabilities within accountability systems, leading to greater administrative attention and review of their academic progress.
A significant criticism leveled against the No Child Left Behind Act concerned:
Answer: The lack of federal funding to adequately support its mandates.
A primary criticism of NCLB was that the federal funding allocated to states and districts was insufficient to cover the costs associated with implementing the law's extensive requirements.
Senator Ted Kennedy's criticism regarding NCLB implementation highlighted:
Answer: The lack of necessary funds to support the reforms.
Senator Ted Kennedy criticized the implementation of NCLB, pointing out that the necessary financial resources were not adequately provided to support the ambitious reforms mandated by the legislation.
How did NCLB's requirements affect state education budgets, particularly during times of fiscal crisis?
Answer: States had to incur additional expenses for compliance, often without sufficient federal support, straining budgets.
During fiscal crises, states faced the dual challenge of budget cuts and the increased costs associated with NCLB mandates, often without adequate federal reimbursement, leading to significant strain on education budgets.
NCLB aimed to narrow achievement gaps by:
Answer: Establishing common expectations for all students and focusing attention on underserved groups.
NCLB sought to reduce achievement gaps by setting uniform expectations for all students and directing specific attention towards the academic progress of historically underserved populations.
What issue arose concerning the testing of English language learners under NCLB?
Answer: Many states tested them primarily in English, potentially under-reporting learning progress, despite a three-year window for native language assessment.
While NCLB permitted native language assessments for English language learners for up to three years, many states opted to test them primarily in English, which critics argued could obscure their actual academic progress.
A 2006 study on schools failing Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in California and Illinois found that these schools:
Answer: Predominantly served minority students, unlike schools meeting AYP.
A 2006 study revealed that schools failing to meet AYP in California and Illinois primarily served minority student populations, in contrast to schools that met AYP, which had a higher proportion of white students.
Arguments that NCLB's focus on standardized testing might lead to a narrowing of the curriculum suggested that teachers might:
Answer: Prioritize teaching only the specific skills and content measured by the tests.
Concerns about curriculum narrowing suggested that teachers might focus instruction narrowly on testable material to ensure students performed well on standardized assessments, potentially neglecting broader educational goals.
The 'Reading First' program under NCLB aimed to improve literacy skills for students in high school.
Answer: False
The 'Reading First' program was specifically designed to support research-based reading instruction for students in kindergarten through third grade, not high school students.
The Enhancing Education Through Technology Program (EETT) under NCLB focused on providing funding for school infrastructure like buildings and grounds.
Answer: False
The EETT program under NCLB was intended to fund technology integration in classrooms, professional development for educators in using technology, and research into educational technology, rather than physical infrastructure.
The Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program under NCLB aimed to improve student achievement by fostering university-school collaborations.
Answer: True
The Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program was designed to enhance student achievement in these subjects by creating partnerships between higher education institutions and K-12 schools to improve teacher content knowledge and instructional practices.
The 'Reading First' program established by NCLB was designed to:
Answer: Help states implement research-based reading programs for K-3 students.
'Reading First' was an initiative under NCLB aimed at assisting states in adopting and implementing scientifically research-based reading programs for students in kindergarten through third grade.
What was the purpose of the 'Mathematics and Science Partnerships' (MSP) program under Title II of NCLB?
Answer: To improve student achievement in math and science through university-school partnerships.
The Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program aimed to enhance student outcomes in math and science by fostering collaborations between universities and K-12 schools to strengthen teacher content knowledge and pedagogical skills.
The Joint Organizational Statement on NCLB advocated for shifting accountability from sanctions to systemic changes that improve student achievement.
Answer: True
A coalition of educational organizations issued a statement calling for NCLB reforms that would move accountability away from punitive sanctions and towards fostering systemic improvements aimed at enhancing student achievement.
The Obama administration's 2010 reform proposals aimed to increase the stringency of accountability punishments under NCLB.
Answer: False
The Obama administration's proposed reforms in 2010 sought to reduce the stringency of accountability punishments and introduce more flexibility, focusing on student growth and a broader range of assessments rather than solely on punitive measures.
President Obama granted waivers from NCLB requirements starting in 2012, allowing states more flexibility in exchange for specific reforms.
Answer: True
Beginning in 2012, the Obama administration offered waivers from certain NCLB provisions to states that committed to implementing specific reforms related to standards, accountability, and teacher effectiveness.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) replaced NCLB and was signed into law in 2015.
Answer: True
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), signed into law in December 2015, officially replaced the No Child Left Behind Act, marking a significant shift in federal education policy.
ESSA provides states less flexibility in setting standards and measuring school performance compared to NCLB.
Answer: False
A key feature of ESSA is that it grants states considerably more flexibility than NCLB in designing their own accountability systems, setting standards, and determining how school performance is measured.
The 'Race to the Top' initiative was designed to incentivize states to adopt innovative education reforms.
Answer: True
'Race to the Top' was a competitive grant program launched by the Obama administration that encouraged states to develop and implement reforms in key areas such as standards, assessments, data systems, and teacher effectiveness.
The Obama administration's proposed reforms for NCLB's successor legislation aimed to simplify accountability by relying solely on standardized test scores.
Answer: False
The Obama administration's reform proposals sought to move beyond a sole reliance on standardized test scores, advocating for a more comprehensive accountability system that included multiple measures of school success and student growth.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) maintained the federal government's prescriptive mandates for school accountability measures, similar to NCLB.
Answer: False
ESSA significantly shifted power back to the states, reducing the federal government's prescriptive mandates for accountability measures and allowing states greater autonomy in designing their systems.
The Joint Organizational Statement on No Child Left Behind advocated for a shift in accountability from:
Answer: Applying sanctions for failing test scores to implementing systemic changes that improve achievement.
The Joint Organizational Statement called for a reorientation of accountability systems under NCLB, moving from punitive sanctions towards fostering systemic reforms designed to genuinely enhance student achievement.
What was a key aspect of the Obama administration's proposed reforms for the successor legislation to NCLB in 2010?
Answer: Reducing accountability punishments and focusing more on student improvement.
The Obama administration's 2010 reform proposals aimed to mitigate the punitive aspects of NCLB by emphasizing student growth and improvement, and incorporating a wider range of assessment measures.
President Obama began granting waivers from NCLB requirements in 2012, typically in exchange for:
Answer: Raising standards, improving accountability, and enhancing teacher effectiveness.
States receiving waivers from NCLB requirements generally committed to implementing reforms focused on raising academic standards, strengthening accountability systems, and improving teacher effectiveness.
What legislation replaced the No Child Left Behind Act, and when was it signed into law?
Answer: The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) in 2015
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), signed into law in 2015, replaced the No Child Left Behind Act.
How does the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) differ from NCLB regarding state flexibility?
Answer: ESSA grants states more flexibility in setting their own standards and measuring performance.
A key distinction of ESSA is its provision of greater flexibility to states in designing their accountability systems, setting academic standards, and determining how school performance is measured, compared to the more prescriptive approach of NCLB.
The No Child Left Behind Act was primarily sponsored by members of a single political party, indicating limited bipartisan support.
Answer: False
The No Child Left Behind Act was a bipartisan effort, co-authored by key figures from both the Democratic and Republican parties, including Senators Ted Kennedy and Judd Gregg, and Representatives George Miller and John Boehner.
Who were among the key legislative sponsors co-authoring the No Child Left Behind Act in Congress?
Answer: Representatives Boehner and Miller; Senators Kennedy and Gregg
The bipartisan nature of NCLB was evident in its co-sponsorship by key figures such as Representatives John Boehner and George Miller, and Senators Ted Kennedy and Judd Gregg.