Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich holds the esteemed position of Bing Professor Emeritus of Population Studies at Stanford University.
Answer: True
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich holds the esteemed position of Bing Professor Emeritus of Population Studies within the Department of Biology at Stanford University, signifying his extensive career dedicated to population dynamics and their environmental impacts.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich was born in London, England.
Answer: False
Dr. Paul Ralph Ehrlich was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's principal academic specialization was entomology, with a particular focus on butterflies.
Answer: True
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's foundational academic discipline is entomology, with a specific specialization in Lepidoptera, commonly known as butterflies. His scholarly pursuits initially focused on this area before broadening.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich obtained his Ph.D. in zoology from the University of Pennsylvania.
Answer: False
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich earned his Ph.D. in entomology from the University of Kansas, not zoology from the University of Pennsylvania.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's doctoral dissertation centered on the evolutionary relationships among butterfly species.
Answer: True
The title of Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's doctoral dissertation, completed at the University of Kansas, reflects his focus on the morphology, phylogeny, and higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea).
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich has been awarded the Nobel Prize in Biology.
Answer: False
While Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich has received numerous prestigious awards, including the Crafoord Prize, the Nobel Prize in Biology is not among them.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's father was a biologist.
Answer: False
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's father was engaged in the shirt sales industry; his mother was an academic specializing in Greek and Latin.
What is Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich primarily recognized for within the field of environmental science?
Answer: His cautionary pronouncements and projections regarding the adverse consequences of human population growth.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich is widely recognized for his influential warnings and predictions concerning the negative impacts of human population growth on the environment and society.
What academic designation does Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich hold at Stanford University?
Answer: Bing Professor Emeritus of Population Studies.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich holds the distinguished position of Bing Professor Emeritus of Population Studies within the Department of Biology at Stanford University.
In which city and state was Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich born?
Answer: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Dr. Paul Ralph Ehrlich was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
What was Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's initial academic specialization prior to his extensive work in population studies?
Answer: Entomology (Butterflies)
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's foundational academic discipline is entomology, with a specific specialization in Lepidoptera, commonly known as butterflies, before broadening his research scope.
From which university did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich earn his Ph.D. in entomology?
Answer: University of Kansas
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich earned his Ph.D. in entomology from the University of Kansas.
Which of the following is NOT enumerated among the significant awards received by Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich?
Answer: Nobel Prize in Chemistry
While Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich has received numerous prestigious awards, including the Crafoord Prize and the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry is not among his accolades.
Which statement accurately reflects Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's academic background?
Answer: He holds a Ph.D. in entomology from the University of Kansas.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich earned his Ph.D. in entomology from the University of Kansas, following his undergraduate studies in zoology at the University of Pennsylvania.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's seminal work, 'The Population Bomb,' was first published in 1968.
Answer: True
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's most renowned publication is titled 'The Population Bomb,' first issued in 1968. This influential text brought considerable attention to his concerns regarding overpopulation.
A central thesis within 'The Population Bomb' posited that widespread famine would affect millions during the 1980s, irrespective of mitigation efforts.
Answer: False
The original edition of 'The Population Bomb' predicted widespread starvation in the 1970s, not the 1980s. The statement incorrectly specifies the decade.
The genesis of 'The Population Bomb' was attributed to a lecture delivered by Dr. Ehrlich at Stanford University.
Answer: False
The impetus for writing 'The Population Bomb' stemmed from a widely publicized lecture Dr. Ehrlich delivered at the Commonwealth Club of California, not at Stanford University.
Dr. Ehrlich predicted in 1971 that the United Kingdom would experience severe food shortages and a population decline by the year 2000.
Answer: True
In a 1971 address, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich prognosticated that by the year 2000, the United Kingdom would be characterized as 'simply a small group of impoverished islands, inhabited by some 70 million hungry people.'
The Green Revolution validated the accuracy of Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's predictions concerning India's food supply.
Answer: False
The Green Revolution significantly augmented India's food production, thereby contradicting Dr. Ehrlich's dire predictions of famine and demonstrating the limitations of his forecasts in that specific context.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich maintains that the Green Revolution permanently resolved the issue of food scarcity.
Answer: False
Dr. Ehrlich acknowledges the Green Revolution's role in averting immediate crises but argues it merely deferred the fundamental problem of population and resource strain, rather than permanently resolving food scarcity.
What was the title of Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's most influential publication from 1968?
Answer: The Population Bomb
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's seminal work, first published in 1968, which brought widespread attention to his concerns about overpopulation, is titled 'The Population Bomb'.
Which severe prediction was prominently featured in the initial edition of 'The Population Bomb' concerning the 1970s?
Answer: The starvation of hundreds of millions due to overpopulation.
A key prediction within the original edition of 'The Population Bomb' stated that 'In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now,' highlighting Dr. Ehrlich's dire outlook.
What specific event directly precipitated the suggestion that Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich author 'The Population Bomb'?
Answer: A widely publicized lecture at the Commonwealth Club of California.
A lecture delivered by Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich at the Commonwealth Club of California in April 1967, which received considerable radio dissemination, prompted suggestions for him to author 'The Population Bomb'.
What specific prediction did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich articulate concerning the United Kingdom for the year 2000?
Answer: It would be a group of impoverished islands with a hungry populace.
In a 1971 address, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich predicted that by the year 2000, the United Kingdom would be characterized as 'simply a small group of impoverished islands, inhabited by some 70 million hungry people.'
How did the Green Revolution influence the veracity of Dr. Ehrlich's predictions regarding India's food security?
Answer: It significantly increased food production, thereby contradicting his forecasts.
The Green Revolution substantially augmented India's food production capacity, allowing it to support a larger population and thus contradicting the severity of Dr. Ehrlich's predictions of famine outlined in 'The Population Bomb'.
How does Dr. Ehrlich interpret the long-term implications of the Green Revolution, notwithstanding its immediate success in averting famine?
Answer: He argues it merely postponed the issue of population and resource strain.
Dr. Ehrlich contends that the Green Revolution, while averting immediate crises, merely deferred the fundamental problem of population growth and resource strain, suggesting that underlying issues persist.
Critics frequently characterize Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich as a neo-Malthusian, owing to his emphasis on the detrimental effects of population growth.
Answer: True
Due to his analytical focus on the potential adverse consequences of population expansion, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich has frequently been categorized by critics as a neo-Malthusian, aligning with those who advocate for population control based on Malthusian principles.
There is universal consensus among all critics regarding the complete accuracy of Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's population predictions.
Answer: False
Views on Dr. Ehrlich's predictions are divergent; while some scholars find his arguments largely valid, others critique his pessimism and the non-materialization of specific forecasts, indicating a lack of universal consensus.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich asserted in 2004 that population growth had ceased to be a significant global issue.
Answer: False
In 2004, Dr. Ehrlich acknowledged a decline in population growth rates but identified overconsumption by affluent nations as a critical issue, maintaining that his core concerns about environmental degradation remained valid.
Journalist Dan Gardner contends that Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich selectively acknowledges accurate predictions while disregarding those that proved erroneous.
Answer: True
Dan Gardner critiques Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's forecasting methodology, suggesting a tendency to claim credit for successful predictions while failing to adequately address or take responsibility for inaccurate ones.
Charles C. Mann posited that 'The Population Bomb' contributed to human rights violations through the advocacy of coercive population control measures.
Answer: True
Charles C. Mann suggested that 'The Population Bomb' inadvertently fueled an anti-population-growth movement that resulted in global human rights violations, including coercive population control policies.
Bjorn Lomborg concurred with Dr. Ehrlich regarding the accuracy of specific predictions, such as the widespread famine anticipated in the 1970s.
Answer: False
Bjorn Lomborg, among other critics, has pointed out that many of Dr. Ehrlich's specific predictions, such as widespread famine in the 1970s, did not materialize as forecast.
Critics from the political left assert that Dr. Ehrlich overemphasizes population size, thereby neglecting critical issues such as resource distribution and consumption patterns.
Answer: True
A primary critique from the political left is that Dr. Ehrlich places excessive emphasis on population size, potentially overlooking the more significant roles of resource distribution, consumption patterns, and socioeconomic inequalities in environmental degradation.
The Simon-Ehrlich wager was predicated on the future prices of technology stocks.
Answer: False
The Simon-Ehrlich wager was a bet concerning the future prices of specific natural resources, not technology stocks.
The fundamental divergence between Ehrlich and Julian Simon concerned the role of governmental regulation in environmental policy.
Answer: False
The core disagreement between Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich and Julian Simon centered on the impact of population growth on resource availability and prices, not governmental regulation.
Reason magazine has characterized Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich as an 'optimistic futurist'.
Answer: False
Reason magazine has characterized Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich as an 'irrepressible doomster,' highlighting criticisms regarding the accuracy of his predictions.
Critics from the political left contend that Dr. Ehrlich's focus on population size is appropriate, but his proposed solutions are excessively radical.
Answer: False
Critics from the political left generally argue that Dr. Ehrlich places excessive emphasis on population size, potentially overlooking the more significant roles of resource distribution and consumption patterns.
Julian Simon maintained that population growth would inevitably result in resource depletion and elevated prices.
Answer: False
Julian Simon held the opposing view, arguing that human ingenuity and technological advancements would overcome scarcity, leading to improved living standards and lower resource prices despite population growth.
Based on his perspectives on population dynamics, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich is frequently characterized by critics as:
Answer: A neo-Malthusian.
Due to his emphasis on the potential negative impacts of population growth, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich is often categorized by critics as a neo-Malthusian.
What significant issue did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich identify in 2004, in addition to declining population growth rates?
Answer: Excessive consumption by affluent nations.
As of 2004, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich identified excessive consumption by affluent nations as a critical issue, alongside acknowledging a deceleration in population growth rates.
What specific criticism does Dan Gardner articulate regarding Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's forecasting methodologies?
Answer: A failure to acknowledge or assume responsibility for inaccurate predictions.
Dan Gardner critiques Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's forecasting approach, suggesting a tendency to selectively acknowledge successful predictions while failing to adequately address or take responsibility for those that proved erroneous.
What detrimental consequence did Charles C. Mann suggest arose from the anti-population-growth movement influenced by 'The Population Bomb'?
Answer: Human rights abuses, including coercive population control measures.
Charles C. Mann posited that 'The Population Bomb' fueled a movement that resulted in global human rights violations, including coercive population control policies and forced sterilizations.
What constitutes a primary critique leveled by left-wing scholars against Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's body of work?
Answer: A disregard for the roles of overconsumption and socioeconomic inequality.
Critics from the political left argue that Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich places excessive emphasis on population size, potentially overlooking the more critical roles of resource distribution and socioeconomic inequalities.
What was the outcome of the 1980 Simon-Ehrlich wager concerning the prices of natural resources?
Answer: Simon prevailed, as the prices of the selected commodities diminished.
The Simon-Ehrlich wager concluded with Julian Simon winning, as the prices of the selected natural resources decreased over the decade, contrary to Dr. Ehrlich's prediction of escalating prices due to scarcity.
What was the central point of contention between Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich and Julian Simon?
Answer: The impact of population growth on resource availability and prices.
The fundamental disagreement between Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich and Julian Simon centered on the projected impact of population growth on resource availability and prices, with Ehrlich predicting scarcity and Simon anticipating abundance through innovation.
How has Reason magazine characterized Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's predictions?
Answer: As those of an 'irrepressible doomster' who has frequently been incorrect.
Reason magazine has characterized Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's predictions as those of an 'irrepressible doomster,' often highlighting criticisms regarding the perceived inaccuracy of his forecasts.
Which of the following represents a key argument advanced by left-wing critics of Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich?
Answer: Resource distribution and consumption patterns are more critical than population figures alone.
A key argument from left-wing critics is that resource distribution and consumption patterns are more critical factors in environmental issues than population size alone, and that population growth often moderates with socioeconomic development.
What was the subject matter of the Simon-Ehrlich wager?
Answer: The future prices of specific natural resources over a defined decade.
The Simon-Ehrlich wager was a bet concerning the future prices of specific natural resources over a defined decade, contrasting predictions of scarcity-driven price increases with those anticipating innovation-driven price decreases.
Charles C. Mann's critique of 'The Population Bomb' included the assertion that it:
Answer: Fostered a movement resulting in global human rights violations.
Charles C. Mann suggested that 'The Population Bomb' inadvertently fueled a movement that resulted in global human rights violations, including coercive population control policies.
In 1964, Ehrlich and Raven were instrumental in popularizing the concept of genetic drift.
Answer: False
The 1964 paper by Ehrlich and Raven is recognized for popularizing the concept of coevolution, not genetic drift.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich established the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University in 1984.
Answer: True
In 1984, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich founded the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University, which serves as a hub for research and action dedicated to the preservation of biodiversity and ecological systems.
In his 1990 publication, 'The Population Explosion,' Dr. Ehrlich argued that the predicted population catastrophe had commenced.
Answer: True
In 'The Population Explosion,' published in 1990, Dr. Paul and Anne Ehrlich contended that the population catastrophe previously warned about had indeed begun to manifest, citing widespread hunger and imminent threats of famine and disease.
In 2018, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich posited that the optimal human population for Earth approximates 10 billion individuals.
Answer: False
In 2018, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich stated his view that the optimal human population size for the planet is between 1.5 and 2 billion people, significantly lower than 10 billion.
A 2022 publication by Ehrlich and Dirzo advocated for the reduction of fertility rates and the curtailment of consumption as measures to mitigate the extinction crisis.
Answer: True
In a 2022 paper, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich and Rodolfo Dirzo argued for the necessity of reducing fertility rates and curbing wasteful consumption to mitigate the extinction crisis and prevent global civilizational collapse.
In a 2018 interview, Dr. Ehrlich advocated for wealth redistribution as a means to address the excessive consumption patterns of affluent populations.
Answer: True
In a 2018 interview, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich acknowledged the significance of overconsumption and inequality, advocating for an 'unprecedented redistribution of wealth' to address these issues.
The 1964 paper by Ehrlich and Raven is recognized for popularizing the concept of coevolution.
Answer: True
The 1964 paper 'Butterflies and Plants: A Study in Coevolution' by Ehrlich and Raven is critically important for popularizing the concept of coevolution, proposing reciprocal evolutionary influences between interacting species.
Dr. Paul Ehrlich collaborated with Carl Sagan on the 1984 book titled 'The Cold and the Dark: The World after Nuclear War'.
Answer: True
Dr. Paul Ehrlich co-authored 'The Cold and the Dark: The World after Nuclear War' with Carl Sagan, Donald Kennedy, and Walter Orr Roberts, critically examining the potential global consequences of nuclear conflict.
The 2015 publication 'The Annihilation of Nature: Human Extinction of Birds and Mammals,' co-authored by Dr. Ehrlich and colleagues, addresses the ecological impact of human activities on biodiversity.
Answer: True
The 2015 book 'The Annihilation of Nature,' co-authored by Dr. Paul Ehrlich, Anne Ehrlich, and Gerardo Ceballos, critically examines the profound impact of human activities on global biodiversity and the accelerating rate of species extinction.
In 2011, Dr. Ehrlich posited that the subsequent billion individuals added to the global population would exert minimal environmental influence.
Answer: False
In 2011, Dr. Ehrlich argued that the subsequent billion individuals added to the global population would inflict greater environmental harm due to reliance on marginal resources, not minimal influence.
The concept of coevolution, as popularized by Ehrlich and Raven, posits a reciprocal evolutionary influence between interacting species.
Answer: True
The concept of coevolution, significantly advanced by Ehrlich and Raven, describes the mutual evolutionary influence between interacting species, often characterized as an evolutionary 'arms race'.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's 2022 paper with Rodolfo Dirzo primarily advocated for an increase in global fertility rates.
Answer: False
The 2022 paper by Ehrlich and Dirzo advocated for the reduction of fertility rates, particularly among affluent populations, and the curtailment of consumption, not an increase in fertility.
What significant ecological concept did Dr. Paul Ehrlich and Peter H. Raven help popularize in their 1964 publication?
Answer: Coevolution
The 1964 paper by Ehrlich and Raven is critically important for popularizing the concept of coevolution, proposing that reciprocal evolutionary pressures between interacting species drive their diversification.
What center, dedicated to biodiversity preservation, did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich establish at Stanford University in 1984?
Answer: Center for Conservation Biology
In 1984, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich founded the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University, which functions as a focal point for research and action dedicated to the preservation of biodiversity and ecological systems.
In 'The Population Explosion' (1990), what did Dr. Paul and Anne Ehrlich assert had begun to manifest?
Answer: The predicted population catastrophe.
In their 1990 publication, 'The Population Explosion,' Dr. Paul and Anne Ehrlich argued that the population catastrophe previously warned about had indeed begun to manifest.
According to Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's 2018 assessment, what is the estimated optimal human population size for the planet?
Answer: Between 1.5 and 2 billion
In 2018, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich stated his perspective that the optimal human population size for Earth lies between 1.5 and 2 billion individuals.
What measures did Dr. Paul Ehrlich and Rodolfo Dirzo advocate for in their 2022 publication to address the extinction crisis?
Answer: Reducing fertility rates and curbing wasteful consumption.
In their 2022 paper, Dr. Paul Ehrlich and Rodolfo Dirzo advocated for the reduction of fertility rates and the curtailment of wasteful consumption as essential measures to mitigate the extinction crisis.
In a 2018 interview, what did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich propose as a strategy to address the overconsumption patterns of the global affluent?
Answer: An unprecedented redistribution of wealth.
In a 2018 interview, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich advocated for an 'unprecedented redistribution of wealth' as a strategy to address the disproportionate consumption patterns of the global affluent.
What is the significance of the 1964 paper 'Butterflies and Plants: A Study in Coevolution' by Ehrlich and Raven?
Answer: It popularized the concept of coevolution between species.
The 1964 paper by Ehrlich and Raven is critically important for popularizing the concept of coevolution, proposing that reciprocal evolutionary pressures between plants and insects are a principal driver of their diversification.
Dr. Paul Ehrlich co-authored 'The Cold and the Dark: The World after Nuclear War' with which renowned scientist?
Answer: Carl Sagan
Dr. Paul Ehrlich co-authored 'The Cold and the Dark: The World after Nuclear War' with Carl Sagan, Donald Kennedy, and Walter Orr Roberts.
What subject matter is addressed in the 2015 book 'The Annihilation of Nature,' co-authored by Dr. Paul Ehrlich?
Answer: The impact of human activities on biodiversity and species extinction.
The 2015 publication 'The Annihilation of Nature,' co-authored by Dr. Paul Ehrlich and colleagues, critically examines the profound impact of human activities on global biodiversity and the accelerating rate of species extinction.
What was Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich's assertion in 2011 regarding the environmental consequences of the subsequent billion individuals added to the global population?
Answer: They would inflict greater environmental harm by relying on marginal resources.
In 2011, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich argued that the subsequent billion individuals added to the global population would contribute more significantly to environmental degradation due to increased reliance on marginal and ecologically damaging resources.
What did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich argue in his 2022 publication concerning the affluent and their consumption habits?
Answer: Reducing fertility rates among the affluent and curbing consumption are necessary actions.
In his 2022 publication, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich argued for the necessity of reducing fertility rates, particularly among affluent populations, and curbing wasteful consumption to mitigate environmental crises.
What did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich state in 2018 regarding the ideal human population size for Earth?
Answer: It should ideally range between 1.5 and 2 billion.
In 2018, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich articulated his perspective that the optimal human population size for Earth lies between 1.5 and 2 billion individuals.
What did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich argue in 2011 regarding the environmental ramifications of population growth?
Answer: The subsequent two billion individuals would inflict greater environmental harm.
In 2011, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich argued that the subsequent two billion individuals added to the global population would inflict greater environmental harm due to increased reliance on marginal and ecologically damaging resources.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich amplified public awareness of population dynamics through frequent appearances on 'The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson'.
Answer: True
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich significantly elevated public consciousness regarding population dynamics through his media presence, including over twenty appearances on 'The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson'.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich was instrumental in the establishment of the organization Zero Population Growth in 1968.
Answer: True
In 1968, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich was among the principal founders of the organization Zero Population Growth, later renamed Population Connection, which advocates for the stabilization of global population growth.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich underwent a vasectomy in 1963, following the birth of his child.
Answer: True
In 1963, subsequent to the birth of his child, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich underwent a vasectomy, a personal decision reflecting his views on family size and population dynamics.
In 1970, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich suggested that the 'point of no return' for environmental remediation efforts might occur around 1972.
Answer: True
In 1970, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich articulated a sense of urgency regarding environmental issues, suggesting that the 'point of no return' for effective action might be imminent, potentially around 1972.
How did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich effectively utilize media to disseminate his perspectives on population-related issues?
Answer: Through frequent appearances on 'The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson'.
Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich significantly elevated public consciousness regarding population dynamics through his media presence, including numerous appearances on 'The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson,' which facilitated broad dissemination of his views.
What organization, dedicated to stabilizing population growth, did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich help establish in 1968?
Answer: Zero Population Growth
In 1968, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich was among the principal founders of the organization Zero Population Growth, which advocates for the stabilization of global population growth.
What personal decision concerning family planning did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich undertake in 1963?
Answer: He underwent a vasectomy.
In 1963, subsequent to the birth of his child, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich underwent a vasectomy, a personal decision reflecting his views on family size and population dynamics.
What did Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich suggest in 1970 concerning the potential 'point of no return' for environmental mitigation efforts?
Answer: That it was likely to occur around 1972.
In 1970, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich suggested that the 'point of no return' for effective environmental remediation efforts might be imminent, potentially around 1972, implying a critical window for action.