Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



Pauline Kael: A Critical Biography

At a Glance

Title: Pauline Kael: A Critical Biography

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Early Life and Education: 3 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Emergence as a Critic: 6 flashcards, 10 questions
  • The New Yorker Years and Critical Style: 6 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Major Works and Controversies: 18 flashcards, 31 questions
  • Influence and Legacy: 14 flashcards, 24 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 51
  • True/False Questions: 53
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 43
  • Total Questions: 96

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Pauline Kael: A Critical Biography

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Pauline Kael" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Pauline Kael: A Critical Biography

Study Guide: Pauline Kael: A Critical Biography

Early Life and Education

Pauline Kael was born in New York City in 1919.

Answer: False

This assertion is factually incorrect. Pauline Kael was born in Petaluma, California, in 1919.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.
  • What were Kael's early academic pursuits and why did she leave UC Berkeley?: Pauline Kael matriculated at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1936, pursuing studies in philosophy, literature, and art. She withdrew in 1940, initially intending to attend law school, but instead relocated to New York City.

Pauline Kael's parents were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.

Answer: True

Indeed, Pauline Kael's parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who managed a chicken farm.

Related Concepts:

  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What significant life event occurred for Kael's family when she was eight years old?: When Pauline Kael was eight years old, her parents lost their chicken farm, an event that necessitated their relocation to San Francisco, where Kael subsequently attended Girls High School.

Pauline Kael lost her family's chicken farm when she was a teenager, forcing them to move to San Francisco.

Answer: False

The loss of the family chicken farm occurred when Kael was eight years old, prompting their relocation to San Francisco, not during her teenage years.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant life event occurred for Kael's family when she was eight years old?: When Pauline Kael was eight years old, her parents lost their chicken farm, an event that necessitated their relocation to San Francisco, where Kael subsequently attended Girls High School.
  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Pauline Kael studied law at UC Berkeley before dropping out to pursue a career in film criticism.

Answer: False

While Kael attended UC Berkeley, her studies focused on philosophy, literature, and art. She did not pursue law, and her departure from university preceded her established career in film criticism.

Related Concepts:

  • What were Kael's early academic pursuits and why did she leave UC Berkeley?: Pauline Kael matriculated at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1936, pursuing studies in philosophy, literature, and art. She withdrew in 1940, initially intending to attend law school, but instead relocated to New York City.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.

Pauline Kael's parents lost their chicken farm when she was 18 years old.

Answer: False

The family lost their chicken farm when Pauline Kael was eight years old, not eighteen.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant life event occurred for Kael's family when she was eight years old?: When Pauline Kael was eight years old, her parents lost their chicken farm, an event that necessitated their relocation to San Francisco, where Kael subsequently attended Girls High School.
  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Pauline Kael's parents were immigrants from France.

Answer: False

Pauline Kael's parents were Jewish immigrants from Poland, not France.

Related Concepts:

  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.

Where was Pauline Kael born?

Answer: Petaluma, California

Pauline Kael was born in Petaluma, California, in 1919.

Related Concepts:

  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What were Kael's early academic pursuits and why did she leave UC Berkeley?: Pauline Kael matriculated at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1936, pursuing studies in philosophy, literature, and art. She withdrew in 1940, initially intending to attend law school, but instead relocated to New York City.

What significant event impacted Kael's family when she was eight years old, leading to a major life change?

Answer: They lost their chicken farm and moved to San Francisco.

When Pauline Kael was eight years old, her family experienced the loss of their chicken farm, an event that precipitated their move to San Francisco.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant life event occurred for Kael's family when she was eight years old?: When Pauline Kael was eight years old, her parents lost their chicken farm, an event that necessitated their relocation to San Francisco, where Kael subsequently attended Girls High School.
  • How did Kael support herself and her daughter in her early career?: Following her return to Berkeley and a period of bohemian life, Kael undertook various occupations, including cook and seamstress, and also worked as an advertising copywriter to provide financial support for herself and her daughter, Gina.

What did Pauline Kael initially study at the University of California, Berkeley?

Answer: Philosophy, Literature, and Art

Pauline Kael matriculated at the University of California, Berkeley, where her academic focus was on philosophy, literature, and art.

Related Concepts:

  • What were Kael's early academic pursuits and why did she leave UC Berkeley?: Pauline Kael matriculated at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1936, pursuing studies in philosophy, literature, and art. She withdrew in 1940, initially intending to attend law school, but instead relocated to New York City.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • Where was Pauline Kael born and what was her parents' background?: Pauline Kael was born on June 19, 1919, in Petaluma, California. Her parents, Isaac Paul and Judith Kael, were Jewish immigrants from Poland who operated a chicken farm.

Emergence as a Critic

Pauline Kael supported herself and her daughter through various jobs, including advertising copywriting, before becoming a recognized film critic.

Answer: True

Prior to achieving widespread recognition as a film critic, Kael undertook diverse employment, including roles such as advertising copywriter, to support herself and her daughter.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • How did Kael support herself and her daughter in her early career?: Following her return to Berkeley and a period of bohemian life, Kael undertook various occupations, including cook and seamstress, and also worked as an advertising copywriter to provide financial support for herself and her daughter, Gina.

Pauline Kael began her film criticism career by reviewing Charlie Chaplin's 'The Great Dictator' for 'City Lights' magazine.

Answer: False

Kael's initial foray into regular film criticism involved reviewing Charlie Chaplin's 'Limelight' for 'City Lights' magazine, not 'The Great Dictator'.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • How did Pauline Kael begin her career as a film critic?: In 1952, Peter D. Martin, editor of 'City Lights,' invited Kael to review Charlie Chaplin's 'Limelight' after overhearing her discuss films. This opportunity led to her regular publication of film criticism.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.

Pauline Kael's first book, 'I Lost It at the Movies,' was a critical failure and sold very few copies.

Answer: False

Contrary to this statement, 'I Lost It at the Movies' achieved considerable success, becoming a bestseller and marking a significant milestone in her career.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of Kael's first book, "I Lost It at the Movies"?: Published in 1965, 'I Lost It at the Movies' was a collection of Kael's critical essays that achieved considerable commercial success, selling 150,000 paperback copies. This publication marked her transition into broader public recognition.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • Can you provide examples of films that Pauline Kael championed despite critical consensus?: Pauline Kael frequently championed films that diverged from mainstream critical opinion, including works such as 'The Warriors' and 'Last Tango in Paris,' demonstrating her willingness to support films against prevailing sentiment.

William Shawn of 'The New Yorker' published Kael's essay on 'Bonnie and Clyde' after 'The New Republic' rejected it.

Answer: True

This is accurate. 'The New Republic' declined to publish Kael's extensive essay on 'Bonnie and Clyde,' but William Shawn subsequently published it in 'The New Yorker,' facilitating her association with the magazine.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael's essay on " Bonnie and Clyde" lead to her joining The New Yorker?: After 'The New Republic' declined to publish her extensive essay on 'Bonnie and Clyde,' William Shawn of 'The New Yorker' acquired and published the piece. This essay, which lauded the film against prevailing critical sentiment, was pivotal in her joining the magazine's staff.
  • What was the nature of Kael's relationship with The New Yorker's editor, William Shawn?: Kael's relationship with 'The New Yorker' editor William Shawn was complex, often involving editorial disagreements. Despite these conflicts, Shawn generally granted her considerable editorial freedom, as exemplified by her insistence on publishing her review of 'Badlands' without changes.

Kael's book 'I Lost It at the Movies' was published in 1965 and became a bestseller.

Answer: True

Published in 1965, Pauline Kael's debut book, 'I Lost It at the Movies,' achieved significant commercial success and became a bestseller.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of Kael's first book, "I Lost It at the Movies"?: Published in 1965, 'I Lost It at the Movies' was a collection of Kael's critical essays that achieved considerable commercial success, selling 150,000 paperback copies. This publication marked her transition into broader public recognition.
  • What was the significance of Kael's book "Deeper into Movies" winning the National Book Award?: 'Deeper into Movies' achieved the distinction of being the first nonfiction book about film to win the National Book Award in the Arts and Letters category in 1974, underscoring the critical recognition Kael's work garnered.
  • Which of Kael's books won the National Book Award, and why was this significant?: Kael's collection 'Deeper into Movies' (1973) received the U.S. National Book Award in Arts and Letters. This marked a significant achievement, as it was the first time a nonfiction book dedicated to film criticism had been granted this prestigious award.

What was Pauline Kael's primary occupation for which she gained widespread recognition?

Answer: American film critic

Pauline Kael achieved widespread recognition primarily for her distinguished career as an American film critic, most notably during her long tenure at 'The New Yorker'.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.

How did Kael support herself and her daughter, Gina, during her early career before achieving widespread recognition?

Answer: By taking on various jobs, including advertising copywriter.

Before gaining widespread recognition, Kael sustained herself and her daughter through diverse employment, notably including work as an advertising copywriter.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael support herself and her daughter in her early career?: Following her return to Berkeley and a period of bohemian life, Kael undertook various occupations, including cook and seamstress, and also worked as an advertising copywriter to provide financial support for herself and her daughter, Gina.
  • How did Kael's role as manager of the Cinema-Guild and Studio influence her career?: From 1955 to 1960, Kael managed the Cinema-Guild and Studio, where she curated film programming and penned concise, engaging capsule reviews for patrons. These writings garnered a dedicated following and contributed to her developing critical voice.
  • How did Pauline Kael begin her career as a film critic?: In 1952, Peter D. Martin, editor of 'City Lights,' invited Kael to review Charlie Chaplin's 'Limelight' after overhearing her discuss films. This opportunity led to her regular publication of film criticism.

What film review marked the beginning of Pauline Kael's regular publication of film criticism?

Answer: Her review of Charlie Chaplin's 'Limelight' for 'City Lights'.

Kael's regular publication of film criticism commenced with her review of Charlie Chaplin's 'Limelight' for 'City Lights' magazine.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • How did Pauline Kael begin her career as a film critic?: In 1952, Peter D. Martin, editor of 'City Lights,' invited Kael to review Charlie Chaplin's 'Limelight' after overhearing her discuss films. This opportunity led to her regular publication of film criticism.

What was the critical and commercial reception of Kael's first book, 'I Lost It at the Movies'?

Answer: It was a surprise bestseller, selling 150,000 copies.

'I Lost It at the Movies,' Kael's first book, achieved unexpected commercial success, selling approximately 150,000 copies and establishing her as a prominent critical voice.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of Kael's first book, "I Lost It at the Movies"?: Published in 1965, 'I Lost It at the Movies' was a collection of Kael's critical essays that achieved considerable commercial success, selling 150,000 paperback copies. This publication marked her transition into broader public recognition.
  • What was the significance of Kael's book "Deeper into Movies" winning the National Book Award?: 'Deeper into Movies' achieved the distinction of being the first nonfiction book about film to win the National Book Award in the Arts and Letters category in 1974, underscoring the critical recognition Kael's work garnered.
  • Which of Kael's books won the National Book Award, and why was this significant?: Kael's collection 'Deeper into Movies' (1973) received the U.S. National Book Award in Arts and Letters. This marked a significant achievement, as it was the first time a nonfiction book dedicated to film criticism had been granted this prestigious award.

How did Kael's essay on 'Bonnie and Clyde' contribute to her career trajectory?

Answer: It was published by 'The New Yorker' and led to her joining their staff.

Following its publication in 'The New Yorker,' Kael's essay on 'Bonnie and Clyde' significantly advanced her career, ultimately leading to her joining the magazine's editorial staff.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael's essay on " Bonnie and Clyde" lead to her joining The New Yorker?: After 'The New Republic' declined to publish her extensive essay on 'Bonnie and Clyde,' William Shawn of 'The New Yorker' acquired and published the piece. This essay, which lauded the film against prevailing critical sentiment, was pivotal in her joining the magazine's staff.
  • How did Pauline Kael begin her career as a film critic?: In 1952, Peter D. Martin, editor of 'City Lights,' invited Kael to review Charlie Chaplin's 'Limelight' after overhearing her discuss films. This opportunity led to her regular publication of film criticism.
  • How did Kael's role as manager of the Cinema-Guild and Studio influence her career?: From 1955 to 1960, Kael managed the Cinema-Guild and Studio, where she curated film programming and penned concise, engaging capsule reviews for patrons. These writings garnered a dedicated following and contributed to her developing critical voice.

The New Yorker Years and Critical Style

Kael aimed for a highly academic and objective tone in her film reviews, avoiding personal opinions.

Answer: False

Kael actively eschewed academic pomposity and 'saphead objectivity,' favoring a more personal, conversational, and opinionated style in her critiques.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.
  • What was Kael's view on the term "film" versus "movies"?: Pauline Kael generally avoided the term 'film,' considering it potentially elitist. She preferred 'movies,' aligning with her objective to make film criticism accessible to a broader audience.
  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'

Pauline Kael's writing style was initially considered a perfect fit for the traditional, sophisticated tone of 'The New Yorker'.

Answer: False

On the contrary, Kael's colloquial and direct style was initially perceived as an unusual, even jarring, fit for the established tone of 'The New Yorker'.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • What was the initial reaction to Kael's writing style at The New Yorker?: Upon her arrival at 'The New Yorker,' Kael's colloquial and direct writing style was initially perceived as an unconventional fit, with one commentator metaphorically describing it as 'trampling' through the magazine's pages.

Pauline Kael's relationship with 'New Yorker' editor William Shawn was consistently smooth and free of editorial disagreements.

Answer: False

The relationship between Kael and William Shawn was often marked by editorial contention, though Shawn generally afforded her significant creative latitude.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • What was the nature of Kael's relationship with The New Yorker's editor, William Shawn?: Kael's relationship with 'The New Yorker' editor William Shawn was complex, often involving editorial disagreements. Despite these conflicts, Shawn generally granted her considerable editorial freedom, as exemplified by her insistence on publishing her review of 'Badlands' without changes.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Kael's writing style often blended references to high culture with informal, sometimes coarse, language.

Answer: True

A hallmark of Kael's critical voice was its synthesis of sophisticated cultural references with accessible, often colloquial or even coarse, vernacular.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.
  • How did Kael's style blend high and low culture in her reviews?: Kael's writing style characteristically merged references to high culture, such as literary figures, with informal and sometimes coarse language, creating a distinctive and engaging critical voice accessible to a wide readership.
  • What was the initial reaction to Kael's writing style at The New Yorker?: Upon her arrival at 'The New Yorker,' Kael's colloquial and direct writing style was initially perceived as an unconventional fit, with one commentator metaphorically describing it as 'trampling' through the magazine's pages.

Pauline Kael preferred the term 'film' over 'movies' because she considered it more sophisticated.

Answer: False

Kael generally favored the term 'movies,' viewing 'film' as potentially elitist and preferring language that resonated with a broader audience.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's view on the term "film" versus "movies"?: Pauline Kael generally avoided the term 'film,' considering it potentially elitist. She preferred 'movies,' aligning with her objective to make film criticism accessible to a broader audience.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.

Kael's tenure at The New Yorker began in 1968 and ended in 1991.

Answer: True

Pauline Kael's association with 'The New Yorker' commenced in 1968 and concluded in 1991, spanning over two decades of prolific criticism.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What award did Pauline Kael receive in 1970 for her critical work?: In 1970, Pauline Kael was honored with a George Polk Award for her significant contributions as a critic.

Kael's criticism was characterized by its objective analysis and lack of personal opinion.

Answer: False

Kael's critical approach was decidedly subjective and personal, marked by strong opinions and a rejection of detached, objective analysis.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.
  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'
  • What was Kael's view on the term "film" versus "movies"?: Pauline Kael generally avoided the term 'film,' considering it potentially elitist. She preferred 'movies,' aligning with her objective to make film criticism accessible to a broader audience.

For which magazine did Pauline Kael serve as the primary film critic for the longest period?

Answer: The New Yorker

Pauline Kael's most significant and longest-serving role as a film critic was at 'The New Yorker,' where she worked from 1968 to 1991.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.

Kael's writing philosophy centered on avoiding which critical approach?

Answer: Academic pomposity and 'saphead objectivity'

Kael's critical philosophy explicitly aimed to move away from what she termed 'academic pomposity' and 'saphead objectivity' in favor of a more direct and humanistic engagement with films.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.
  • What was Kael's view on the term "film" versus "movies"?: Pauline Kael generally avoided the term 'film,' considering it potentially elitist. She preferred 'movies,' aligning with her objective to make film criticism accessible to a broader audience.
  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'

What was the initial reaction to Kael's writing style upon her arrival at 'The New Yorker'?

Answer: It was seen as an unusual fit, described metaphorically as 'trampling' with cowboy boots.

Kael's distinctive, colloquial writing style was initially perceived as an unconventional match for 'The New Yorker,' with one observer likening it to 'trampling' through the publication's pages.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the initial reaction to Kael's writing style at The New Yorker?: Upon her arrival at 'The New Yorker,' Kael's colloquial and direct writing style was initially perceived as an unconventional fit, with one commentator metaphorically describing it as 'trampling' through the magazine's pages.
  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Which editor at 'The New Yorker' often had editorial battles with Kael but generally allowed her considerable freedom?

Answer: William Shawn

William Shawn, the long-serving editor of 'The New Yorker,' frequently engaged in editorial disputes with Pauline Kael, yet he largely permitted her substantial autonomy in her critical work.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.
  • What was the nature of Kael's relationship with The New Yorker's editor, William Shawn?: Kael's relationship with 'The New Yorker' editor William Shawn was complex, often involving editorial disagreements. Despite these conflicts, Shawn generally granted her considerable editorial freedom, as exemplified by her insistence on publishing her review of 'Badlands' without changes.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Which of the following best describes Kael's blend of high and low culture in her writing?

Answer: She referenced literary figures alongside informal, coarse language.

Kael's writing adeptly integrated references to high culture, such as literary figures, with informal and sometimes coarse language, creating a distinctive and engaging critical voice.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael's style blend high and low culture in her reviews?: Kael's writing style characteristically merged references to high culture, such as literary figures, with informal and sometimes coarse language, creating a distinctive and engaging critical voice accessible to a wide readership.
  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.
  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'

Why did Pauline Kael prefer the term 'movies' over 'film'?

Answer: She considered 'film' elitist and wanted her criticism to be accessible.

Kael favored the term 'movies' over 'film,' believing the latter carried elitist connotations and preferring language that facilitated broader accessibility for her criticism.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's view on the term "film" versus "movies"?: Pauline Kael generally avoided the term 'film,' considering it potentially elitist. She preferred 'movies,' aligning with her objective to make film criticism accessible to a broader audience.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Major Works and Controversies

Kael's highly critical review of 'The Sound of Music' in 'McCall's' magazine directly led to her immediate dismissal from the publication.

Answer: False

While Kael's review of 'The Sound of Music' was notably harsh, the claim that it directly caused her immediate dismissal from 'McCall's' is debated; sources indicate her departure occurred months later for other reasons.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's controversial review of "The Sound of Music" and what was its alleged consequence?: Kael's review of 'The Sound of Music' in 'McCall's' was highly critical, deeming its message a 'sugarcoated lie.' While legend attributes her dismissal to this review, Kael and the editor denied this, stating her departure occurred months later for other reasons.
  • What was the nature of Kael's relationship with The New Yorker's editor, William Shawn?: Kael's relationship with 'The New Yorker' editor William Shawn was complex, often involving editorial disagreements. Despite these conflicts, Shawn generally granted her considerable editorial freedom, as exemplified by her insistence on publishing her review of 'Badlands' without changes.
  • What was the significance of Kael's first book, "I Lost It at the Movies"?: Published in 1965, 'I Lost It at the Movies' was a collection of Kael's critical essays that achieved considerable commercial success, selling 150,000 paperback copies. This publication marked her transition into broader public recognition.

Pauline Kael's book 'Raising Kane' focused on the authorship of the film 'Casablanca'.

Answer: False

Kael's influential essay 'Raising Kane' critically examined the authorship of the film 'Citizen Kane,' not 'Casablanca'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the subject of Kael's influential book-length essay "Raising Kane"?: 'Raising Kane' (1971) was a substantial essay by Kael that critically examined the authorship of the film 'Citizen Kane,' arguing for Herman J. Mankiewicz as the primary screenwriter.
  • What was Kael's stance on the auteur theory?: Pauline Kael was a notable opponent of the auteur theory, which emphasizes the director as the primary creative force behind a film. She preferred to analyze films as collaborative products, acknowledging the contributions of various artists involved.

Kael's essay 'Raising Kane' led to a libel suit filed against her by Orson Welles.

Answer: False

While Orson Welles reportedly considered legal action due to the claims made in 'Raising Kane,' a formal libel suit was not filed against Kael.

Related Concepts:

  • What controversy arose from Kael's "Raising Kane" essay regarding Orson Welles?: Kael's 'Raising Kane' essay alleged that Orson Welles had sought to deny Herman J. Mankiewicz proper screen credit for 'Citizen Kane.' This assertion prompted Welles to contemplate a libel suit and sparked debate among critics.
  • What was the subject of Kael's influential book-length essay "Raising Kane"?: 'Raising Kane' (1971) was a substantial essay by Kael that critically examined the authorship of the film 'Citizen Kane,' arguing for Herman J. Mankiewicz as the primary screenwriter.
  • What was the nature of Kael's relationship with The New Yorker's editor, William Shawn?: Kael's relationship with 'The New Yorker' editor William Shawn was complex, often involving editorial disagreements. Despite these conflicts, Shawn generally granted her considerable editorial freedom, as exemplified by her insistence on publishing her review of 'Badlands' without changes.

Pauline Kael consistently championed films that were critically acclaimed by the majority of reviewers.

Answer: False

Kael was often known for championing films that diverged from or even opposed prevailing critical consensus, frequently supporting works that were initially overlooked or panned.

Related Concepts:

  • Can you provide examples of films that Pauline Kael championed despite critical consensus?: Pauline Kael frequently championed films that diverged from mainstream critical opinion, including works such as 'The Warriors' and 'Last Tango in Paris,' demonstrating her willingness to support films against prevailing sentiment.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.

Pauline Kael was a proponent of the auteur theory, emphasizing the director's sole creative vision.

Answer: False

Kael was notably critical of the auteur theory, preferring to analyze films as collaborative endeavors rather than solely the product of a director's singular vision.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's stance on the auteur theory?: Pauline Kael was a notable opponent of the auteur theory, which emphasizes the director as the primary creative force behind a film. She preferred to analyze films as collaborative products, acknowledging the contributions of various artists involved.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.

Kael was known for her consistently positive reviews of Clint Eastwood's films, earning her the nickname 'his muse'.

Answer: False

Conversely, Kael became known as Clint Eastwood's 'nemesis' due to her frequent and often harsh critiques of his directorial work.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael view films that depicted violence, and who was a notable director she criticized for this?: Kael possessed an affinity for films exploring violence but reacted negatively to those she perceived as promoting 'right-wing' or 'fascist' agendas. She frequently criticized Clint Eastwood's films, earning the designation of his 'nemesis' due to her consistently unfavorable reviews.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the nature of Kael's relationship with The New Yorker's editor, William Shawn?: Kael's relationship with 'The New Yorker' editor William Shawn was complex, often involving editorial disagreements. Despite these conflicts, Shawn generally granted her considerable editorial freedom, as exemplified by her insistence on publishing her review of 'Badlands' without changes.

Kael believed that critics offended by movie brutality should advocate for censorship to protect audiences.

Answer: False

Kael argued that critics should analyze the implications of brutality rather than advocate for censorship, believing that failing to engage critically with such content was a dereliction of duty.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's perspective on the role of film critics in relation to censorship?: Kael contended that critics should not advocate for censorship when offended by movie brutality. Instead, she argued for the critical freedom to analyze such content, asserting that failing to do so implicitly condones excessive violence.
  • What was Kael's critique of directors using brutal imagery in films like "A Clockwork Orange"?: Kael expressed concern that the use of brutal imagery by directors, as seen in 'A Clockwork Orange,' risked desensitizing audiences to violence rather than sensitizing them to its ramifications, potentially implying a universal brutality.
  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'

Accusations of homophobia were leveled against Kael, particularly concerning her review of 'Rich and Famous'.

Answer: True

Indeed, Kael faced accusations of homophobia, notably stemming from her commentary in the review of the film 'Rich and Famous'.

Related Concepts:

  • What accusations of homophobia were leveled against Pauline Kael, and how did she respond?: Accusations of homophobia were directed at Kael, particularly following her review of 'Rich and Famous,' where certain comments were deemed problematic. She refuted these claims, asserting that her broader writings did not support such interpretations.
  • What specific remark did Kael make about "The Children's Hour" that drew criticism?: Kael's commentary on the film 'The Children's Hour' included a statement suggesting that lesbians might warrant sympathy due to 'not much they *can* do,' a remark later cited as indicative of homophobia.
  • How did Kael view films that depicted violence, and who was a notable director she criticized for this?: Kael possessed an affinity for films exploring violence but reacted negatively to those she perceived as promoting 'right-wing' or 'fascist' agendas. She frequently criticized Clint Eastwood's films, earning the designation of his 'nemesis' due to her consistently unfavorable reviews.

The 'Nixon quote' controversy involved Kael claiming she voted for Nixon.

Answer: False

The 'Nixon quote' controversy originated from Kael's statement that she knew only one person who voted for Nixon, not from a claim of her own vote.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the "Nixon quote" attributed to Kael, and why did it become controversial?: The 'Nixon quote' controversy stemmed from Kael's statement that she knew only one person who voted for Nixon. This remark was later misconstrued and cited by conservatives as evidence of liberal elite insularity, becoming a widely circulated anecdote.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What accusations of homophobia were leveled against Pauline Kael, and how did she respond?: Accusations of homophobia were directed at Kael, particularly following her review of 'Rich and Famous,' where certain comments were deemed problematic. She refuted these claims, asserting that her broader writings did not support such interpretations.

Kael was highly critical of most experimental cinema, viewing it as self-congratulatory.

Answer: True

Kael frequently expressed skepticism towards experimental cinema, often characterizing it as overly self-congratulatory and lacking substantive artistic merit.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'
  • Conversely, what are some examples of critically acclaimed films that Kael panned?: Kael was known to critique films that received widespread critical admiration, such as 'Network,' 'A Woman Under the Influence,' 'The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner,' and '2001: A Space Odyssey,' often finding fault where others found merit.
  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.

Pauline Kael described Sam Peckinpah's 'Straw Dogs' as a celebration of American individualism.

Answer: False

While acknowledging its energy, Kael controversially labeled Sam Peckinpah's 'Straw Dogs' as 'the first American film that is a fascist work of art,' rather than a celebration of individualism.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's opinion of Sam Peckinpah's "Straw Dogs"?: While Kael generally appreciated Peckinpah's work, she controversially described his 1971 film 'Straw Dogs' as 'the first American film that is a fascist work of art,' despite acknowledging its inventive qualities.

Kael characterized Don Siegel's 'Dirty Harry' as a 'liberal fantasy' that celebrated democratic values.

Answer: False

Kael's assessment of Don Siegel's 'Dirty Harry' was quite different; she described it as a 'right-wing fantasy' and a critique of liberal values.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific criticism did Kael have regarding Don Siegel's "Dirty Harry"?: Kael characterized Don Siegel's 'Dirty Harry' (1971) as a 'right-wing fantasy' and a 'remarkably single-minded attack on liberal values,' reflecting her strong critique of its perceived political message.

Kael's remark about 'The Children's Hour' suggested that lesbians were inherently sympathetic due to their limited options.

Answer: True

Kael's commentary on 'The Children's Hour' included a statement suggesting that lesbians might warrant sympathy due to perceived limitations in their life choices, a remark that later drew criticism.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific remark did Kael make about "The Children's Hour" that drew criticism?: Kael's commentary on the film 'The Children's Hour' included a statement suggesting that lesbians might warrant sympathy due to 'not much they *can* do,' a remark later cited as indicative of homophobia.

Michael Moore accused Kael of printing 'outright lies' in her review of 'Roger & Me'.

Answer: True

Michael Moore publicly accused Pauline Kael of disseminating 'outright lies' and engaging in 'disinformation' within her review of his documentary 'Roger & Me'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Michael Moore's criticism of Kael's review of his documentary "Roger & Me"?: Michael Moore accused Kael's review of 'Roger & Me' of containing 'outright lies' and engaging in 'disinformation,' characterizing her critique as a revisionist attempt to fabricate facts about the film.

Pauline Kael praised 'It's a Wonderful Life' as a masterpiece of American cinema.

Answer: False

Contrary to this statement, Kael was notably critical of 'It's a Wonderful Life,' listing it among films she disliked despite their general critical acclaim.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's view on the film "It's a Wonderful Life"?: Pauline Kael expressed a negative view of 'It's a Wonderful Life,' including it among films she disliked despite their widespread critical admiration.

Kael's essay 'Raising Kane' argued that Orson Welles was the sole creative force behind 'Citizen Kane'.

Answer: False

In 'Raising Kane,' Kael contended that Herman J. Mankiewicz was the primary screenwriter for 'Citizen Kane,' thereby challenging the notion of Orson Welles as the film's sole creative architect.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the subject of Kael's influential book-length essay "Raising Kane"?: 'Raising Kane' (1971) was a substantial essay by Kael that critically examined the authorship of the film 'Citizen Kane,' arguing for Herman J. Mankiewicz as the primary screenwriter.
  • What controversy arose from Kael's "Raising Kane" essay regarding Orson Welles?: Kael's 'Raising Kane' essay alleged that Orson Welles had sought to deny Herman J. Mankiewicz proper screen credit for 'Citizen Kane.' This assertion prompted Welles to contemplate a libel suit and sparked debate among critics.
  • What was Kael's stance on the auteur theory?: Pauline Kael was a notable opponent of the auteur theory, which emphasizes the director as the primary creative force behind a film. She preferred to analyze films as collaborative products, acknowledging the contributions of various artists involved.

Kael's review of 'The Sound of Music' was praised for its insightful analysis of the film's themes.

Answer: False

Kael's review of 'The Sound of Music' was highly critical and controversial, not praised for its insightful analysis of themes.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's controversial review of "The Sound of Music" and what was its alleged consequence?: Kael's review of 'The Sound of Music' in 'McCall's' was highly critical, deeming its message a 'sugarcoated lie.' While legend attributes her dismissal to this review, Kael and the editor denied this, stating her departure occurred months later for other reasons.
  • How did Woody Allen characterize Pauline Kael's critical abilities?: Woody Allen lauded Kael's passion, wit, writing style, and extensive film knowledge, but critically noted her deficiency in judgment, which he found surprising at times.
  • What was the significance of Kael's book "Deeper into Movies" winning the National Book Award?: 'Deeper into Movies' achieved the distinction of being the first nonfiction book about film to win the National Book Award in the Arts and Letters category in 1974, underscoring the critical recognition Kael's work garnered.

Which movement in cinema did Pauline Kael actively champion through her reviews?

Answer: The New Hollywood movement

Pauline Kael was a notable advocate for the New Hollywood movement, championing its directors and their distinctive cinematic sensibilities through her critical writings.

Related Concepts:

  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

What film's review in 'McCall's' became legendary for its controversy, although its direct link to her firing is debated?

Answer: The Sound of Music

Kael's highly critical review of 'The Sound of Music' in 'McCall's' magazine is widely remembered for its controversial nature, though its direct causal relationship with her dismissal from the publication remains a subject of discussion.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's controversial review of "The Sound of Music" and what was its alleged consequence?: Kael's review of 'The Sound of Music' in 'McCall's' was highly critical, deeming its message a 'sugarcoated lie.' While legend attributes her dismissal to this review, Kael and the editor denied this, stating her departure occurred months later for other reasons.

Kael's book-length essay 'Raising Kane' primarily challenged the authorship of which classic film?

Answer: Citizen Kane

The seminal essay 'Raising Kane' by Pauline Kael critically examined the authorship of the iconic film 'Citizen Kane'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the subject of Kael's influential book-length essay "Raising Kane"?: 'Raising Kane' (1971) was a substantial essay by Kael that critically examined the authorship of the film 'Citizen Kane,' arguing for Herman J. Mankiewicz as the primary screenwriter.
  • What controversy arose from Kael's "Raising Kane" essay regarding Orson Welles?: Kael's 'Raising Kane' essay alleged that Orson Welles had sought to deny Herman J. Mankiewicz proper screen credit for 'Citizen Kane.' This assertion prompted Welles to contemplate a libel suit and sparked debate among critics.
  • What was Kael's stance on the auteur theory?: Pauline Kael was a notable opponent of the auteur theory, which emphasizes the director as the primary creative force behind a film. She preferred to analyze films as collaborative products, acknowledging the contributions of various artists involved.

What controversy did Kael's 'Raising Kane' essay generate regarding Orson Welles?

Answer: It accused Welles of stealing credit from Herman J. Mankiewicz.

Kael's 'Raising Kane' essay posited that Orson Welles had unfairly taken credit for the screenplay of 'Citizen Kane' from its co-author, Herman J. Mankiewicz.

Related Concepts:

  • What controversy arose from Kael's "Raising Kane" essay regarding Orson Welles?: Kael's 'Raising Kane' essay alleged that Orson Welles had sought to deny Herman J. Mankiewicz proper screen credit for 'Citizen Kane.' This assertion prompted Welles to contemplate a libel suit and sparked debate among critics.
  • What was the subject of Kael's influential book-length essay "Raising Kane"?: 'Raising Kane' (1971) was a substantial essay by Kael that critically examined the authorship of the film 'Citizen Kane,' arguing for Herman J. Mankiewicz as the primary screenwriter.

Which of these films did Pauline Kael champion, going against prevailing critical opinion?

Answer: The Warriors

Pauline Kael notably championed films such as 'The Warriors,' often against prevailing critical consensus.

Related Concepts:

  • Can you provide examples of films that Pauline Kael championed despite critical consensus?: Pauline Kael frequently championed films that diverged from mainstream critical opinion, including works such as 'The Warriors' and 'Last Tango in Paris,' demonstrating her willingness to support films against prevailing sentiment.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was Kael's view on the film "It's a Wonderful Life"?: Pauline Kael expressed a negative view of 'It's a Wonderful Life,' including it among films she disliked despite their widespread critical admiration.

Pauline Kael was a notable opponent of which film theory?

Answer: The auteur theory

Pauline Kael was a prominent critic of the auteur theory, which posits the director as the primary author of a film.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's stance on the auteur theory?: Pauline Kael was a notable opponent of the auteur theory, which emphasizes the director as the primary creative force behind a film. She preferred to analyze films as collaborative products, acknowledging the contributions of various artists involved.

Kael became known as the 'nemesis' of which director due to her consistently unfavorable reviews?

Answer: Clint Eastwood

Clint Eastwood was frequently the subject of Kael's critical disapproval, leading to her being labeled his 'nemesis' in film criticism circles.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael view films that depicted violence, and who was a notable director she criticized for this?: Kael possessed an affinity for films exploring violence but reacted negatively to those she perceived as promoting 'right-wing' or 'fascist' agendas. She frequently criticized Clint Eastwood's films, earning the designation of his 'nemesis' due to her consistently unfavorable reviews.
  • What was the nature of Kael's relationship with The New Yorker's editor, William Shawn?: Kael's relationship with 'The New Yorker' editor William Shawn was complex, often involving editorial disagreements. Despite these conflicts, Shawn generally granted her considerable editorial freedom, as exemplified by her insistence on publishing her review of 'Badlands' without changes.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

What was Kael's concern regarding directors who used brutal imagery, such as in 'A Clockwork Orange'?

Answer: She worried it desensitized audiences to violence rather than sensitizing them.

Kael expressed concern that the depiction of brutality in films like 'A Clockwork Orange' risked desensitizing viewers to violence, rather than fostering a deeper understanding of its consequences.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's critique of directors using brutal imagery in films like "A Clockwork Orange"?: Kael expressed concern that the use of brutal imagery by directors, as seen in 'A Clockwork Orange,' risked desensitizing audiences to violence rather than sensitizing them to its ramifications, potentially implying a universal brutality.
  • What was Kael's perspective on the role of film critics in relation to censorship?: Kael contended that critics should not advocate for censorship when offended by movie brutality. Instead, she argued for the critical freedom to analyze such content, asserting that failing to do so implicitly condones excessive violence.
  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'

Accusations of homophobia against Kael were often linked to her comments in a review of which film?

Answer: Rich and Famous

The film 'Rich and Famous' was central to accusations of homophobia leveled against Kael, stemming from specific remarks made in her review.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific remark did Kael make about "The Children's Hour" that drew criticism?: Kael's commentary on the film 'The Children's Hour' included a statement suggesting that lesbians might warrant sympathy due to 'not much they *can* do,' a remark later cited as indicative of homophobia.
  • What accusations of homophobia were leveled against Pauline Kael, and how did she respond?: Accusations of homophobia were directed at Kael, particularly following her review of 'Rich and Famous,' where certain comments were deemed problematic. She refuted these claims, asserting that her broader writings did not support such interpretations.
  • Conversely, what are some examples of critically acclaimed films that Kael panned?: Kael was known to critique films that received widespread critical admiration, such as 'Network,' 'A Woman Under the Influence,' 'The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner,' and '2001: A Space Odyssey,' often finding fault where others found merit.

The 'Nixon quote' controversy surrounding Kael originated from her statement about:

Answer: Knowing only one person who voted for Nixon.

The 'Nixon quote' controversy arose from Kael's remark that she was acquainted with only one individual who had voted for Richard Nixon.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the "Nixon quote" attributed to Kael, and why did it become controversial?: The 'Nixon quote' controversy stemmed from Kael's statement that she knew only one person who voted for Nixon. This remark was later misconstrued and cited by conservatives as evidence of liberal elite insularity, becoming a widely circulated anecdote.

Kael's critique of experimental cinema often characterized it as:

Answer: A creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.

Kael frequently described experimental cinema as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry,' indicating her skepticism towards its perceived self-importance.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific films did Kael pan that were considered experimental cinema?: Kael was often critical of experimental cinema, characterizing it as 'a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry.' She also dismissed most student films as akin to 'freshmen compositions.'

How did Kael describe Don Siegel's 'Dirty Harry'?

Answer: A right-wing fantasy and attack on liberal values.

Kael characterized Don Siegel's 'Dirty Harry' as a 'right-wing fantasy' and a pointed attack on liberal values.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific criticism did Kael have regarding Don Siegel's "Dirty Harry"?: Kael characterized Don Siegel's 'Dirty Harry' (1971) as a 'right-wing fantasy' and a 'remarkably single-minded attack on liberal values,' reflecting her strong critique of its perceived political message.

What was Kael's stance on the role of film critics in relation to censorship?

Answer: They should use their freedom to analyze the implications, not be silenced.

Kael argued that critics offended by movie brutality should not be silenced by censorship but should instead utilize their critical freedom to analyze the implications of such content.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Kael's perspective on the role of film critics in relation to censorship?: Kael contended that critics should not advocate for censorship when offended by movie brutality. Instead, she argued for the critical freedom to analyze such content, asserting that failing to do so implicitly condones excessive violence.
  • What was Kael's critique of directors using brutal imagery in films like "A Clockwork Orange"?: Kael expressed concern that the use of brutal imagery by directors, as seen in 'A Clockwork Orange,' risked desensitizing audiences to violence rather than sensitizing them to its ramifications, potentially implying a universal brutality.
  • What accusations of homophobia were leveled against Pauline Kael, and how did she respond?: Accusations of homophobia were directed at Kael, particularly following her review of 'Rich and Famous,' where certain comments were deemed problematic. She refuted these claims, asserting that her broader writings did not support such interpretations.

Michael Moore accused Kael's review of 'Roger & Me' of containing what?

Answer: Outright lies and disinformation

Michael Moore contended that Pauline Kael's review of his documentary 'Roger & Me' contained 'outright lies' and 'disinformation'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Michael Moore's criticism of Kael's review of his documentary "Roger & Me"?: Michael Moore accused Kael's review of 'Roger & Me' of containing 'outright lies' and engaging in 'disinformation,' characterizing her critique as a revisionist attempt to fabricate facts about the film.

Influence and Legacy

Woody Allen praised Kael's film knowledge and writing style but criticized her lack of judgment.

Answer: True

Woody Allen acknowledged Kael's considerable film knowledge and distinctive writing style, yet he also pointed to a perceived deficiency in her critical judgment.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Woody Allen characterize Pauline Kael's critical abilities?: Woody Allen lauded Kael's passion, wit, writing style, and extensive film knowledge, but critically noted her deficiency in judgment, which he found surprising at times.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • Conversely, what are some examples of critically acclaimed films that Kael panned?: Kael was known to critique films that received widespread critical admiration, such as 'Network,' 'A Woman Under the Influence,' 'The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner,' and '2001: A Space Odyssey,' often finding fault where others found merit.

Renata Adler's review of Kael's 'When the Lights Go Down' was highly complimentary.

Answer: False

Renata Adler's critique of Kael's book 'When the Lights Go Down' was notably severe, describing the work in highly negative terms.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Renata Adler's critique of Kael's book "When the Lights Go Down"?: Renata Adler published a highly critical review of Kael's 'When the Lights Go Down,' describing the book in the 'New York Review of Books' as 'jarringly, piece by piece, line by line, and without interruption, worthless,' and faulting its perceived lack of intelligence and sensibility.

Richard Corliss described Kael's writing style as dense and influenced by French film theory.

Answer: False

Richard Corliss contrasted Kael's style, which he characterized as 'loping, derisive, intimate, gag-packed,' with Andrew Sarris's prose, which was indeed described as dense and influenced by French film theory.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Richard Corliss's comparison of Kael's writing style to Andrew Sarris's?: Richard Corliss contrasted Kael's 'loping, derisive, intimate, gag-packed' style, which he likened to Lenny Bruce, with Andrew Sarris's prose, described as 'dense, balanced, aphoristic, alliterative' and influenced by French film theory.

Younger critics who admired Kael's style were sometimes referred to as 'The Paulettes'.

Answer: True

The term 'The Paulettes' was indeed used, often pejoratively, to describe the cohort of younger critics who adopted or were heavily influenced by Pauline Kael's distinctive critical approach.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael's influence extend to younger critics, and what term was used for them?: Kael's influence extended to a generation of younger critics who adopted her writing style. These critics were sometimes disparagingly referred to as 'The Paulettes,' and they significantly shaped the landscape of national film criticism.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the duration of Pauline Kael's association with The New Yorker?: Pauline Kael contributed to 'The New Yorker' from 1968 to 1991. Initially, she shared the film critic role on a six-month rotation with Penelope Gilliatt, eventually becoming the sole critic in 1980.

Paul Schrader's admission to UCLA Film School was based on a recommendation from Pauline Kael.

Answer: True

Paul Schrader, the screenwriter for 'Taxi Driver,' gained admission to UCLA Film School's graduate program based on a recommendation provided by Pauline Kael.

Related Concepts:

  • Which director's career was significantly impacted by Kael's recommendation, and in what way?: Paul Schrader, the screenwriter for 'Taxi Driver,' was admitted to UCLA Film School's graduate program based on a recommendation from Pauline Kael, who mentored him during his development as a critic.
  • What were Kael's early academic pursuits and why did she leave UC Berkeley?: Pauline Kael matriculated at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1936, pursuing studies in philosophy, literature, and art. She withdrew in 1940, initially intending to attend law school, but instead relocated to New York City.

George Lucas honored Pauline Kael by naming a character 'General Kael' in his film 'Star Wars'.

Answer: False

George Lucas paid tribute to Pauline Kael by naming a character 'General Kael' in his film 'Willow,' not 'Star Wars'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was George Lucas's tribute to Pauline Kael in his film "Willow"?: George Lucas honored Pauline Kael by naming a character, the villainous 'General Kael,' in his 1988 film 'Willow.' Kael herself noted this as an 'hommage à moi' (a tribute to me).

Quentin Tarantino cited Pauline Kael as a significant influence on his aesthetic, comparable to directors.

Answer: True

Quentin Tarantino has stated that Pauline Kael's criticism was as influential on his aesthetic development as any film director.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Quentin Tarantino describe Pauline Kael's influence on his aesthetic?: Quentin Tarantino stated that Pauline Kael was as influential on his aesthetic development as any director, having avidly read her criticism throughout his formative years.

Pauline Kael's book 'Deeper into Movies' was the first nonfiction book about film to win the National Book Award.

Answer: True

Yes, 'Deeper into Movies' achieved the distinction of being the first nonfiction book focused on film to receive the prestigious National Book Award.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of Kael's book "Deeper into Movies" winning the National Book Award?: 'Deeper into Movies' achieved the distinction of being the first nonfiction book about film to win the National Book Award in the Arts and Letters category in 1974, underscoring the critical recognition Kael's work garnered.
  • Which of Kael's books won the National Book Award, and why was this significant?: Kael's collection 'Deeper into Movies' (1973) received the U.S. National Book Award in Arts and Letters. This marked a significant achievement, as it was the first time a nonfiction book dedicated to film criticism had been granted this prestigious award.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

The Pauline Kael Breakout Award is given by the Los Angeles Film Critics Association.

Answer: False

The Pauline Kael Breakout Award is presented by the Florida Film Critics Circle, not the Los Angeles Film Critics Association.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Pauline Kael Breakout Award, and who awards it?: The Pauline Kael Breakout Award is an annual accolade presented by the Florida Film Critics Circle to recognize an outstanding contribution to cinema, honoring the spirit of Kael's influential criticism.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

The documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael' explored her work and influence in film criticism.

Answer: True

The 2018 documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael' indeed delved into her critical contributions and her significant impact on the field of film criticism.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the subject of the 2018 documentary "What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael"?: The 2018 documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael,' narrated by Sarah Jessica Parker, explored Kael's critical work and her significant influence within the predominantly male domains of cinema and film criticism.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.

David Thomson suggested Kael made movies seem like the most telling impression of who society was.

Answer: True

David Thomson posited that Kael helped establish the perception that movies served as a profound reflection of societal identity and experience.

Related Concepts:

  • How did David Thomson describe Kael's impact on the perception of movies in society?: David Thomson suggested that Kael helped establish the perception that movies belonged to the audience and served as a vital commentary on society, making them appear as a 'most telling, deeply felt impression of who we were and might be.'

The documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael' was narrated by Meryl Streep.

Answer: False

The documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael' was narrated by Sarah Jessica Parker, not Meryl Streep.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the subject of the 2018 documentary "What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael"?: The 2018 documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael,' narrated by Sarah Jessica Parker, explored Kael's critical work and her significant influence within the predominantly male domains of cinema and film criticism.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Pauline Kael's book 'Deeper into Movies' won the National Book Award in 1973.

Answer: False

While 'Deeper into Movies' was published in 1973, it received the National Book Award in 1974.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of Kael's book "Deeper into Movies" winning the National Book Award?: 'Deeper into Movies' achieved the distinction of being the first nonfiction book about film to win the National Book Award in the Arts and Letters category in 1974, underscoring the critical recognition Kael's work garnered.
  • Which of Kael's books won the National Book Award, and why was this significant?: Kael's collection 'Deeper into Movies' (1973) received the U.S. National Book Award in Arts and Letters. This marked a significant achievement, as it was the first time a nonfiction book dedicated to film criticism had been granted this prestigious award.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

According to Roger Ebert, what was the nature of Pauline Kael's influence on American film culture?

Answer: She had a significant positive influence, characterized by a personal, opinionated style.

Roger Ebert asserted that Pauline Kael exerted a profoundly positive influence on American film culture, largely due to her highly personal and opinionated critical methodology.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Roger Ebert, what significant influence did Pauline Kael have on American film culture?: Roger Ebert posited that Pauline Kael exerted a more positive influence on the climate for film in America than any other single individual over the three decades preceding her death. He emphasized her personal, non-theoretical approach, noting her reviews were valued for their style, humor, and energy.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Woody Allen, while admiring Kael's writing, identified a key weakness in her critical approach. What was it?

Answer: Lack of judgment

Woody Allen, despite his admiration for Kael's wit and style, identified a significant flaw in her critical approach: a perceived lack of sound judgment.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Woody Allen characterize Pauline Kael's critical abilities?: Woody Allen lauded Kael's passion, wit, writing style, and extensive film knowledge, but critically noted her deficiency in judgment, which he found surprising at times.
  • What was Kael's philosophy regarding her writing style and the concept of objectivity in criticism?: Kael aimed to cultivate a more accessible writing style, moving away from academic formality towards a humanistic and conversational voice. She actively critiqued 'saphead objectivity,' integrating personal reflections into her reviews.
  • What was Kael's view on the term "film" versus "movies"?: Pauline Kael generally avoided the term 'film,' considering it potentially elitist. She preferred 'movies,' aligning with her objective to make film criticism accessible to a broader audience.

Renata Adler's critique of Kael's book 'When the Lights Go Down' was notably harsh, describing the work as:

Answer: Jarringly, piece by piece, line by line, and without interruption, worthless.

Renata Adler's review of Kael's 'When the Lights Go Down' was exceptionally critical, famously characterizing the book as 'jarringly, piece by piece, line by line, and without interruption, worthless.'

Related Concepts:

  • What was Renata Adler's critique of Kael's book "When the Lights Go Down"?: Renata Adler published a highly critical review of Kael's 'When the Lights Go Down,' describing the book in the 'New York Review of Books' as 'jarringly, piece by piece, line by line, and without interruption, worthless,' and faulting its perceived lack of intelligence and sensibility.

How did Richard Corliss contrast Kael's writing style with that of Andrew Sarris?

Answer: He described Kael's as 'loping, derisive, intimate, gag-packed' versus Sarris's dense, theory-influenced prose.

Richard Corliss characterized Kael's style as 'loping, derisive, intimate, gag-packed,' contrasting it sharply with Andrew Sarris's dense, theory-laden prose.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Richard Corliss's comparison of Kael's writing style to Andrew Sarris's?: Richard Corliss contrasted Kael's 'loping, derisive, intimate, gag-packed' style, which he likened to Lenny Bruce, with Andrew Sarris's prose, described as 'dense, balanced, aphoristic, alliterative' and influenced by French film theory.

What term was sometimes used, often derisively, for the younger critics influenced by Kael's writing style?

Answer: The Paulettes

Younger critics who emulated Pauline Kael's distinctive critical style were sometimes referred to, often dismissively, as 'The Paulettes'.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Kael's influence extend to younger critics, and what term was used for them?: Kael's influence extended to a generation of younger critics who adopted her writing style. These critics were sometimes disparagingly referred to as 'The Paulettes,' and they significantly shaped the landscape of national film criticism.
  • How did Kael's style blend high and low culture in her reviews?: Kael's writing style characteristically merged references to high culture, such as literary figures, with informal and sometimes coarse language, creating a distinctive and engaging critical voice accessible to a wide readership.
  • What was Richard Corliss's comparison of Kael's writing style to Andrew Sarris's?: Richard Corliss contrasted Kael's 'loping, derisive, intimate, gag-packed' style, which he likened to Lenny Bruce, with Andrew Sarris's prose, described as 'dense, balanced, aphoristic, alliterative' and influenced by French film theory.

George Lucas paid tribute to Pauline Kael by naming a character after her in which film?

Answer: Willow

George Lucas honored Pauline Kael by naming the villainous character 'General Kael' in his 1988 film 'Willow'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was George Lucas's tribute to Pauline Kael in his film "Willow"?: George Lucas honored Pauline Kael by naming a character, the villainous 'General Kael,' in his 1988 film 'Willow.' Kael herself noted this as an 'hommage à moi' (a tribute to me).

Quentin Tarantino described Pauline Kael as being as influential on his aesthetic as:

Answer: Any director

Quentin Tarantino has stated that Pauline Kael's critical writings were as influential on his aesthetic development as any film director.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Quentin Tarantino describe Pauline Kael's influence on his aesthetic?: Quentin Tarantino stated that Pauline Kael was as influential on his aesthetic development as any director, having avidly read her criticism throughout his formative years.

What distinction did Pauline Kael's book 'Deeper into Movies' achieve upon winning the National Book Award?

Answer: It was the first nonfiction book about film to win the award.

'Deeper into Movies' achieved the significant distinction of being the inaugural nonfiction book concerning film to secure the National Book Award.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of Kael's book "Deeper into Movies" winning the National Book Award?: 'Deeper into Movies' achieved the distinction of being the first nonfiction book about film to win the National Book Award in the Arts and Letters category in 1974, underscoring the critical recognition Kael's work garnered.
  • Which of Kael's books won the National Book Award, and why was this significant?: Kael's collection 'Deeper into Movies' (1973) received the U.S. National Book Award in Arts and Letters. This marked a significant achievement, as it was the first time a nonfiction book dedicated to film criticism had been granted this prestigious award.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

Which organization awards the Pauline Kael Breakout Award?

Answer: The Florida Film Critics Circle

The Pauline Kael Breakout Award is presented annually by the Florida Film Critics Circle.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Pauline Kael Breakout Award, and who awards it?: The Pauline Kael Breakout Award is an annual accolade presented by the Florida Film Critics Circle to recognize an outstanding contribution to cinema, honoring the spirit of Kael's influential criticism.
  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.

The 2018 documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael' explored Kael's work and her influence within which context?

Answer: The male-dominated fields of cinema and film criticism

The documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael' examined her career and impact within the context of cinema and film criticism, fields historically dominated by men.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was Pauline Kael and what was her primary occupation?: Pauline Kael was a prominent American film critic, most renowned for her extensive tenure at 'The New Yorker' magazine from 1968 to 1991. Her critical output was distinguished by its wit, strong opinions, and incisive focus, often challenging prevailing critical consensus.
  • What was the subject of the 2018 documentary "What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael"?: The 2018 documentary 'What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael,' narrated by Sarah Jessica Parker, explored Kael's critical work and her significant influence within the predominantly male domains of cinema and film criticism.
  • What role did Pauline Kael play in bringing attention to international and New Hollywood cinema?: Pauline Kael was instrumental in introducing American readers to international cinema and actively championed directors associated with the New Hollywood movement, thereby lending significant visibility to their artistic aims and sensibilities.

David Thomson suggested that Kael helped establish the idea that movies:

Answer: Belonged to the audience and spoke to society.

David Thomson proposed that Kael was instrumental in fostering the notion that movies were intrinsically linked to the audience and served as a medium for societal discourse.

Related Concepts:

  • How did David Thomson describe Kael's impact on the perception of movies in society?: David Thomson suggested that Kael helped establish the perception that movies belonged to the audience and served as a vital commentary on society, making them appear as a 'most telling, deeply felt impression of who we were and might be.'

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy