Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
The New People Society, an organization comprising Taiwanese students studying in mainland China, is credited with initiating the Petition Movement.
Answer: False
Contrary to the assertion, the New People Society, which initiated the movement, was composed of Taiwanese students studying in Japan, not mainland China.
The origins of the Petition Movement can be traced back to the 'Law 63 Repealing Movement' in 1918.
Answer: True
The 'Law 63 Repealing Movement' of 1918 is identified as a significant precursor and origin point for the subsequent Petition Movement.
The movement gained significant traction and support primarily due to the initial efforts of students studying abroad.
Answer: False
While students studying in Japan were crucial initiators, the movement's significant traction and broader support evolved over time, involving various groups and later gaining wider public sympathy.
The 'Great Petition' is mentioned as a related topic, suggesting a comparison to other significant petitioning efforts.
Answer: True
The reference to the 'Great Petition' indicates a contextual link, suggesting that the Taiwanese movement can be understood in relation to other historical instances of large-scale petitioning.
Who were the primary initiators of the Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament?
Answer: The New People Society, comprising Taiwanese students studying in Japan
The movement was initiated by the New People Society, an organization formed by Taiwanese students studying in Japan.
What earlier movement served as the origin for the Petition Movement?
Answer: The Law 63 Repealing Movement
The Petition Movement's origins are traced back to the 'Law 63 Repealing Movement' which occurred in 1918.
What was the New People Society?
Answer: An organization of Taiwanese students studying in Japan that initiated the movement
The New People Society was an organization founded by Taiwanese students studying in Japan, and it was instrumental in initiating the Petition Movement.
What negative effect did 'Law 63' supposedly have on Taiwan, according to Lin Cheng-lu?
Answer: It undermined Taiwan's uniqueness and independence.
Lin Cheng-lu argued that the authoritarian system established by 'Law 63' detrimentally affected Taiwan's uniqueness and independence.
The central objective of the Petition Movement was to achieve complete independence for Taiwan from Japanese rule.
Answer: False
The primary objective of the movement was not complete independence, but rather the establishment of an autonomous parliament within the framework of Japanese rule.
The Petition Movement represented a shift from modern political activism to armed resistance against Japanese rule.
Answer: False
The movement signified a transition from armed struggle towards modern political activism, focusing on petitions and advocacy rather than violent confrontation.
The Petition Movement primarily utilized armed conflict and sabotage as its main forms of activism.
Answer: False
The movement's primary methodology was modern political activism, characterized by petitions and advocacy, marking a departure from earlier reliance on armed conflict.
The movement's goal was to establish a parliament that operated independently of the Japanese government.
Answer: False
The objective was to establish an autonomous parliament, implying self-governance within Taiwan, but not complete independence from the Japanese government.
What was the central objective of the Petition Movement?
Answer: To establish an autonomous parliament in Taiwan through petitions
The primary goal was to advocate for the establishment of an autonomous parliament in Taiwan by submitting petitions to the Japanese Imperial Diet.
The Petition Movement represented a significant change in Taiwanese resistance tactics by shifting focus from:
Answer: Armed struggle to modern political activism
The movement marked a strategic shift, moving away from armed resistance towards organized political activism, including petitioning and advocacy.
What does the term 'modern-style political activism' emphasize in the context of this movement?
Answer: Focus on petitions, advocacy, and political engagement
'Modern-style political activism' in this context refers to organized efforts centered on petitions, advocacy, and engagement with established political structures, distinguishing it from armed struggle.
Which of the following is mentioned as an alternative name for the Petition Movement?
Answer: The Taiwan Representative Assembly campaign
The movement is also referred to as the Taiwan Representative Assembly campaign, reflecting its core objective.
Lin Hsien-tang was a key leader who founded the League for the Establishment of a Formosan Parliament in 1923.
Answer: True
Lin Hsien-tang, a prominent figure in the movement, established the League for the Establishment of a Formosan Parliament in 1923 to advance the cause of a Taiwanese parliament.
Lin Cheng-lu proposed focusing the movement's efforts on armed rebellion rather than political advocacy.
Answer: False
Lin Cheng-lu advocated for shifting the movement's focus towards establishing a Taiwanese parliament through political advocacy, not armed rebellion.
Lin Cheng-lu believed that 'Law 63' strengthened Taiwan's autonomy and independence.
Answer: False
Lin Cheng-lu contended that the authoritarian system established by 'Law 63' undermined Taiwan's uniqueness and independence, rather than strengthening it.
The League for the Establishment of a Formosan Parliament was founded after the petitioning efforts had already concluded.
Answer: False
The League for the Establishment of a Formosan Parliament was founded in 1923, during the petitioning phase of the movement which began in 1921.
Lin Cheng-lu advocated for the parliament based on principles of authoritarian rule.
Answer: False
Lin Cheng-lu based his proposal for a Taiwanese parliament on the principles of Japanese constitutional politics, advocating for representative government.
In what year was the League for the Establishment of a Formosan Parliament founded?
Answer: 1923
The League for the Establishment of a Formosan Parliament was founded in 1923 by Lin Hsien-tang.
What was Lin Cheng-lu's key proposal regarding the direction of the movement?
Answer: To shift the focus towards advocating for a Taiwanese parliament.
Lin Cheng-lu proposed redirecting the movement's efforts towards advocating for the establishment of a Taiwanese parliament.
What was Lin Cheng-lu's primary motivation for proposing a Taiwanese parliament?
Answer: To counter the negative impact of Law 63 on Taiwan's uniqueness and independence
Lin Cheng-lu's primary motivation stemmed from his belief that 'Law 63' negatively impacted Taiwan's distinctiveness and autonomy, leading him to advocate for a parliament.
The Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament predominantly occurred during the latter half of the 20th century.
Answer: False
The historical record indicates that the Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament was primarily active during the first half of the 20th century, not the latter half.
The petitioning phase of the movement spanned more than two decades, from 1921 to 1934.
Answer: False
The petitioning phase of the movement lasted for 14 years, from 1921 to 1934, not over two decades.
A total of 10 petitions were submitted to the Japanese Imperial Diet during the movement.
Answer: False
The historical records indicate that 15 petitions were submitted to the Japanese Imperial Diet throughout the duration of the movement.
The Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament was the shortest significant political movement during the Japanese colonial period.
Answer: False
The Petition Movement is recognized as the longest political movement during the Japanese colonial period in Taiwan, spanning 14 years.
The first petition for a Taiwanese parliament was submitted on January 30, 1921, to the Japanese Governor-General's Office.
Answer: False
The initial petition was submitted on January 30, 1921, but it was directed to the Japanese Imperial Diet, not the Governor-General's Office.
The Petition Movement officially concluded in 1934, after 14 years of petitioning efforts.
Answer: True
The movement formally terminated in 1934, marking the culmination of 14 years of sustained petitioning activities.
During which historical period did the Petition Movement primarily take place?
Answer: The first half of the 20th century, under Japanese rule
The movement occurred during the first half of the 20th century, a period when Taiwan was under Japanese colonial administration.
How long did the petitioning phase of the movement last?
Answer: 14 years
The petitioning phase of the movement spanned a total of 14 years.
To which legislative body were the petitions submitted during the movement?
Answer: The Japanese Imperial Diet
The petitions were submitted to the Japanese Imperial Diet, the national legislative body of Japan at the time.
How many petitions were submitted in total during the movement?
Answer: 15
A total of 15 petitions were submitted to the Japanese Imperial Diet throughout the movement's duration.
In what year did the Petition Movement officially terminate?
Answer: 1934
The Petition Movement officially concluded in the year 1934.
What was the significance of the Japanese Imperial Diet in relation to the movement?
Answer: It was the target of the petitions seeking parliamentary establishment.
The Japanese Imperial Diet served as the primary recipient of the petitions, representing the legislative body to which the movement directed its demands for a Taiwanese parliament.
The 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance' was successfully established and operated throughout the movement without interference.
Answer: False
The 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance,' formed during the movement's preparations, was subsequently banned by the Taiwan Governor-General, Den Kenjiro.
The banning of the 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance' led to a decrease in public support for the movement.
Answer: False
Following the banning of the alliance and the subsequent 'Incident of Security Maintenance,' the movement actually experienced an increase in support from both Taiwanese citizens and sympathetic Japanese public opinion.
The Japanese colonial government employed democratic dialogue and negotiation to address the movement's demands.
Answer: False
The Japanese colonial government primarily utilized suppression tactics, including 'fascist suppression,' rather than engaging in democratic dialogue or negotiation with the movement.
Den Kenjiro, the Governor-General of Taiwan, supported the formation of the 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance'.
Answer: False
Governor-General Den Kenjiro did not support the 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance'; instead, he banned its formation due to concerns about social order.
What happened to the 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance' formed during the movement's preparations?
Answer: It was banned by the Taiwan Governor-General, Den Kenjiro.
The 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance' was banned by Governor-General Den Kenjiro, preventing its full operation.
What event occurred as a direct consequence of the banning of the 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance'?
Answer: The 'Incident of Security Maintenance'
The banning of the 'Taiwan Parliament Period Alliance' led directly to the 'Incident of Security Maintenance,' highlighting the government's response to organized political activity.
What type of suppression did the Japanese colonial government employ that contributed to the movement's termination?
Answer: Fascist suppression
The Japanese colonial government utilized 'fascist suppression' tactics, creating an environment that made sustained political activism increasingly untenable.
The 'Incident of Security Maintenance' resulted in:
Answer: Increased support for the movement from Taiwanese citizens and Japanese public opinion.
The 'Incident of Security Maintenance,' occurring after the banning of the alliance, paradoxically led to increased support for the movement from both Taiwanese citizens and segments of Japanese public opinion.
The dissolution of the Taiwanese People's Party in 1931 strengthened the petition movement's organizational support.
Answer: False
The dissolution of the Taiwanese People's Party in 1931 removed a key organizational support structure, thereby weakening the petition movement.
The limited local elections introduced in Taiwan in 1935 were unrelated to the Petition Movement.
Answer: False
The introduction of limited local elections in 1935 is considered an outcome influenced by the sustained efforts and political pressure generated by the Petition Movement.
The movement contributed to the development of the rule of law and the pursuit of constitutional values in Taiwan.
Answer: True
Through its organized political advocacy, the movement played a role in fostering the principles of the rule of law and promoting the aspiration for constitutional governance in Taiwan.
The Petition Movement was ultimately successful in establishing a fully autonomous Taiwanese parliament before the end of Japanese rule.
Answer: False
Despite its sustained efforts, the movement did not achieve its ultimate goal of establishing a fully autonomous Taiwanese parliament during the period of Japanese rule.
The movement's duration and methods contributed to the development of Taiwan's legal and political landscape.
Answer: True
The sustained nature and the political activism employed by the movement significantly influenced the evolution of Taiwan's legal framework and political discourse.
Which factor significantly weakened the movement's organizational support, contributing to its end?
Answer: The dissolution of the Taiwanese People's Party
The dissolution of the Taiwanese People's Party in 1931 removed a crucial organizational pillar, significantly weakening the movement's support structure.
What significant electoral reform was introduced in Taiwan in 1935, influenced by the movement?
Answer: Limited local elections initiating autonomous governance
In 1935, limited local elections were introduced in Taiwan, marking a step towards local autonomous governance, influenced by the movement's sustained advocacy.
How did the Petition Movement contribute to the development of the rule of law in Taiwan?
Answer: By promoting principles of the rule of law through organized political advocacy
The movement's engagement in organized political advocacy and petitioning helped to promote the principles of the rule of law and constitutionalism in Taiwan.
How did the movement influence Japanese policy or governance in Taiwan?
Answer: It influenced the introduction of partial elections for local governance in 1935.
The sustained efforts of the movement contributed to the Japanese colonial government's decision to introduce partial elections for local governance in 1935.
What was the ultimate outcome of the 15 petitions submitted by the movement over 14 years?
Answer: The achievement of significant reforms like limited local elections, though not a full parliament.
While the ultimate goal of a fully autonomous parliament was not achieved, the movement's efforts resulted in significant reforms, including the introduction of limited local elections.