Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 7
Plant stress measurement primarily focuses on quantifying the impact of biotic factors on plant health.
Answer: False
Plant stress measurement quantifies the impact of environmental factors, primarily focusing on abiotic factors like light, temperature, water, and nutrients, though biotic factors are also considered.
Plants are considered under stress only when their growth is completely halted.
Answer: False
Plants are considered under stress when they are subjected to less than ideal growing conditions, which can negatively affect growth, survival, and crop yields, not solely when growth is completely halted.
Light, temperature, water, and nutrients are considered the main abiotic factors investigated in plant stress research.
Answer: True
Plant stress research primarily investigates the response of plants to limitations or excesses of the main abiotic factors, which include light, temperature, water, and nutrients.
Pests, pathogens, and pollutants are never considered important stress factors in plant stress situations.
Answer: False
In addition to abiotic factors, pests, pathogens, and pollutants are considered important stress factors in particular plant stress situations.
The modern focus of plant stress measurement has shifted from visual assessments to instrumental analysis of internal plant processes.
Answer: True
The modern focus of plant stress measurement has shifted from visual assessments to using instruments and protocols that reveal the response of specific internal processes within the plant.
One objective of plant stress measurement is to identify species resistant to particular stress factors.
Answer: True
One of the three main objectives of plant stress measurement is identifying which species or subspecies are resistant to particular stress factors.
What is the fundamental definition of plant stress measurement?
Answer: The quantification of how environmental factors impact the health of plants.
Plant stress measurement is fundamentally defined as the quantification of how environmental factors impact the health of plants, assessing the effects of less than ideal growing conditions on plant vitality.
Which of the following is NOT considered a primary abiotic factor in plant stress research?
Answer: Pathogens
Primary abiotic factors include light, temperature, water, and nutrients. Pathogens are considered other important stress factors, not primary abiotic ones.
What has been the modern focus of plant stress measurement, moving beyond visual assessments?
Answer: Using instruments to reveal internal processes like photosynthesis and cell signaling.
The modern focus of plant stress measurement has shifted to using instruments and protocols that reveal the response of specific internal processes within the plant, such as photosynthesis and cell signaling.
Which of the following is one of the three main objectives of plant stress measurement?
Answer: To determine the optimal conditions for plant growth.
One of the three main objectives of plant stress measurement is to determine the optimal conditions for plant growth, such as optimizing water use in agriculture.
What type of instrument is commonly used to measure parameters related to photosynthesis for plant stress assessment?
Answer: Chlorophyll fluorometers
Among the most commonly used instruments for measuring plant stress are those that measure parameters related to photosynthesis, such as chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence (measured by fluorometers), and gas exchange.
Photosynthesis systems measure carbon assimilation by detecting changes in oxygen concentration within leaf chambers.
Answer: False
Photosynthesis systems measure carbon assimilation by using infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) to detect changes in carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration within leaf chambers.
Photosynthesis systems measure H2O changes to determine leaf transpiration and correct CO2 measurements due to overlapping light absorption spectra.
Answer: True
Photosynthesis systems measure H2O changes to determine leaf transpiration and to correct CO2 measurements, as the light absorption spectra for CO2 and H2O overlap.
When a plant is under stress, its carbon assimilation rate, designated as 'A,' typically increases.
Answer: False
When a plant is under stress, its carbon assimilation rate, designated as 'A,' typically decreases, indicating reduced photosynthetic activity.
CO2 infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) typically have an accuracy of approximately +/- 10 µmol or 10 ppm.
Answer: False
CO2 infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) typically have an accuracy of approximately +/- 1 µmol or 1 ppm.
Photosynthesis systems are often considered the standard for comparison with other instruments because they accurately measure carbon assimilation and transpiration even in stressed plants.
Answer: True
Photosynthesis systems are often considered the standard for comparison with other instruments because they are effective at accurately measuring carbon assimilation and transpiration even at the low rates found in stressed plants.
Advanced photosynthesis instruments can control microclimate parameters like temperature and humidity within the measuring chamber.
Answer: True
Advanced photosynthesis instruments offer variable microclimate control within the measuring chamber, allowing researchers to adjust parameters such as temperature, CO2 level, light level, and humidity.
How do photosynthesis systems measure carbon assimilation in plants?
Answer: By using infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) to detect changes in CO2 concentration.
Photosynthesis systems measure carbon assimilation by using infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) to detect changes in carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration within leaf chambers.
What is the critical measurement for most plant stress assessments using photosynthesis systems?
Answer: Carbon assimilation rate ('A')
The critical measurement for most plant stress assessments using photosynthesis systems is designated as 'A,' or the carbon assimilation rate.
What is the typical accuracy of CO2 infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) used in photosynthesis systems?
Answer: Approximately +/- 1 µmol or 1 ppm
CO2 infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) are typically capable of measuring CO2 concentrations with an accuracy of approximately +/- 1 µmol or 1 ppm.
Why are photosynthesis systems often considered the standard for comparing other plant stress instruments?
Answer: They are effective at accurately measuring carbon assimilation and transpiration even at low rates in stressed plants.
Photosynthesis systems are often considered the standard for comparison because they are effective at accurately measuring carbon assimilation and transpiration even at the low rates found in stressed plants.
Chlorophyll fluorescence provides insights into the health of the plant's root system.
Answer: False
Chlorophyll fluorescence offers insights into the health of the photosynthetic systems located within the leaf, not the root system.
Chlorophyll fluorometers measure the variable fluorescence of photosystem I to quantify plant stress.
Answer: False
Chlorophyll fluorometers are specifically designed to measure the variable fluorescence of photosystem II to quantify plant stress.
The Fv/Fm test is used to determine if plant stress affects photosystem II in a light-adapted state.
Answer: False
The Fv/Fm test is designed to determine whether plant stress is affecting photosystem II in a dark-adapted state.
Light energy absorbed by a leaf can be used in photochemistry, re-emitted as fluorescence, or dissipated as heat.
Answer: True
Light energy absorbed by a leaf can follow three competitive pathways: used in photochemistry, re-emitted as fluorescence, or dissipated as heat.
A higher Fv/Fm ratio indicates greater plant stress due to more open reaction centers being available.
Answer: False
A lower Fv/Fm ratio indicates greater plant stress due to fewer open reaction centers being available.
An Fv/Fm value of 0.79 to 0.84 is considered approximately optimal for many plant species.
Answer: True
An Fv/Fm value typically ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 is considered approximately optimal for many plant species.
What information does chlorophyll fluorescence provide about plant health?
Answer: Insights into the health of the photosynthetic systems within the leaf.
Chlorophyll fluorescence offers insights into the health of the photosynthetic systems located within the leaf.
Which photosystem's variable fluorescence do chlorophyll fluorometers specifically measure to assess plant stress?
Answer: Photosystem II
Chlorophyll fluorometers are specifically designed to measure the variable fluorescence of photosystem II to quantify plant stress.
What is the purpose of the Fv/Fm test in chlorophyll fluorescence measurement?
Answer: To determine whether plant stress is affecting photosystem II in a dark-adapted state.
The Fv/Fm test is designed to determine whether plant stress is affecting photosystem II in a dark-adapted state.
Which of the following is NOT one of the three competitive pathways for light energy absorbed by a leaf?
Answer: Converted directly into structural biomass.
The three competitive pathways for light energy absorbed by a leaf are: used in photochemistry, re-emitted as fluorescence, or dissipated as heat.
How does a lower Fv/Fm ratio indicate greater plant stress?
Answer: It indicates fewer open reaction centers being available.
A lower Fv/Fm ratio indicates greater plant stress due to fewer open reaction centers being available for photochemistry.
What is considered the approximate optimal Fv/Fm value range for many plant species?
Answer: 0.79 to 0.84
An Fv/Fm value typically ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 is considered approximately optimal for many plant species.
What does OJIP or OJIDP involve as a dark-adapted chlorophyll fluorescence technique?
Answer: Observing intermediate peaks and dips in the rise to maximum fluorescence.
OJIP or OJIDP is a dark-adapted chlorophyll fluorescence technique that involves observing intermediate peaks and dips in the rise to maximum fluorescence from minimum fluorescence on a high time resolution scale.
The Y(II) measuring protocol was developed by Luke Hendrickson in 2004.
Answer: False
The Y(II) measuring protocol was developed by Bernard Genty, with its first publications appearing in 1989 and 1990.
Y(II) indicates the amount of energy utilized in photochemistry by photosystem II under steady-state photosynthetic lighting conditions.
Answer: True
Y(II) indicates the amount of energy utilized in photochemistry by photosystem II while the plant is undergoing steady-state photosynthesis.
For C4 plants, Y(II) shows a curve-linear correlation with plant carbon assimilation under most stress types.
Answer: False
For C4 plants, Y(II) correlates linearly with plant carbon assimilation under most types of plant stress, while C3 plants show a curve-linear correlation.
Y(II) values are independent of light irradiation levels and leaf temperature.
Answer: False
Y(II) values vary with changes in light irradiation levels and leaf temperature, so these factors must be controlled or carefully measured.
Y(II) is less sensitive to plant stress types compared to Fv/Fm.
Answer: False
Y(II) has the advantage of being more sensitive to a larger number of plant stress types compared to Fv/Fm.
ETR stands for Electron Transport Rate and is calculated using Y(II), PAR, leaf absorption ratio, and Photosystem II to Photosystem I ratio.
Answer: True
ETR stands for electron transport rate and is calculated using Y(II), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) light level, the average ratio of light absorbed by the leaf (0.84), and the average ratio of Photosystem II to Photosystem I reaction centers (0.50).
Relative ETR values are valuable for stress measurements when comparing plants with vastly different light absorption characteristics.
Answer: False
Relative ETR values are valuable for stress measurements when comparing plants with similar light absorption characteristics, not vastly different ones.
If differences in leaf absorption ratios are a concern, using ETR instead of Y(II) is the best choice.
Answer: False
If differences in leaf absorption ratios are a concern, using Y(II) instead of ETR may be the best choice, as Y(II) does not directly incorporate the leaf absorption ratio.
Who developed the Y(II) measuring protocol?
Answer: Bernard Genty
The Y(II) measuring protocol was developed by Bernard Genty.
What does Y(II) indicate about a plant under steady-state photosynthetic lighting conditions?
Answer: The amount of energy utilized in photochemistry by photosystem II.
Y(II) indicates the amount of energy utilized in photochemistry by photosystem II while the plant is undergoing steady-state photosynthesis.
For C4 plants, how does Y(II) typically correlate with plant carbon assimilation under most types of stress?
Answer: It correlates linearly.
For most types of plant stress, Y(II) correlates linearly with plant carbon assimilation in C4 plants.
What environmental factors must be controlled or carefully measured when using the Y(II) parameter?
Answer: Light irradiation levels and leaf temperature.
When using the Y(II) parameter, light irradiation levels and leaf temperature must be either controlled or carefully measured, as Y(II) values vary with these factors.
What is the advantage of Y(II) over Fv/Fm in detecting plant stress?
Answer: Y(II) is more sensitive to a larger number of plant stress types.
Y(II) has the advantage of being more sensitive to a larger number of plant stress types compared to Fv/Fm.
In the ETR equation (ETR = Y(II) × PAR × 0.84 × 0.5), what does the value 0.84 represent?
Answer: The average ratio of light absorbed by the leaf.
In the ETR equation, 0.84 represents the average ratio of light absorbed by the leaf.
When are relative ETR values valuable for stress measurements?
Answer: When comparing one plant to another, provided they have similar light absorption characteristics.
Relative ETR values are valuable for stress measurements when comparing one plant to another, provided that the plants being compared have similar light absorption characteristics.
When might it be preferable to use Y(II) instead of ETR for plant stress measurements?
Answer: If differences in leaf absorption ratios are a concern or an unwanted variable.
If differences in leaf absorption ratios are a concern or an unwanted variable, then using Y(II) instead of ETR may be the best choice, as Y(II) does not directly incorporate the leaf absorption ratio into its calculation.
What factors can cause variations in leaf absorption characteristics, potentially affecting ETR measurements?
Answer: Water content, the age of the leaf, and other physiological conditions.
Leaf absorption characteristics can vary due to factors such as water content, the age of the leaf, and other physiological conditions, potentially affecting ETR measurements.
Quenching measurements have traditionally been used for assessing light stress and heat stress in plants.
Answer: True
Quenching measurements have traditionally been used for assessing light stress and heat stress in plants.
Luke Hendrickson's simplified lake model parameters allowed for the reintroduction of the NPQ parameter into the puddle model.
Answer: False
Luke Hendrickson's simplified lake model parameters allowed for the reintroduction of the NPQ parameter, which originated from the puddle model, back into the lake model.
What have quenching measurements traditionally been used for in plant stress studies?
Answer: Assessing light stress and heat stress.
Quenching measurements have traditionally been used for assessing light stress and heat stress in plants.
Who provided the initial lake model parameters for quenching measurements?
Answer: Dave Kramer
Dave Kramer provided the initial lake model parameters for quenching measurements in 2004.
Who simplified the lake model parameters for quenching measurements, allowing for the reintroduction of the NPQ parameter?
Answer: Luke Hendrickson
Luke Hendrickson provided simplified lake model parameters, which allowed for the reintroduction of the NPQ parameter into the lake model for quenching measurements.
Chlorophyll content meters use light transmission at two different wavelengths, one for leaf thickness and one for greenness.
Answer: True
Chlorophyll content meters use light transmission at two different wavelengths: infrared for leaf thickness and red light for greenness.
The CCI (Chlorophyll Content Index) uses a logarithmic scale, while the SPAD index uses a linear scale.
Answer: False
The CCI (Chlorophyll Content Index) uses a linear scale, whereas the SPAD index uses a logarithmic scale.
Chlorophyll content meters are commonly used for measuring nutrient plant stress, including nitrogen and sulfur stress.
Answer: True
Chlorophyll content meters are commonly used for measuring nutrient plant stress, specifically including nitrogen stress and sulfur stress.
A suggested threshold for fertigation is when the chlorophyll content index ratio of test plants to well-fertilized plants drops below 85%.
Answer: False
One paper suggests that when the ratio of the chlorophyll content index of test plants to well-fertilized plants drops below 95%, it is an indication that fertigation should occur.
How do chlorophyll content meters determine the greenness of leaves?
Answer: By measuring light transmission in the red light range.
Chlorophyll content meters use a wavelength in the red light range to determine the leaf's greenness.
What is the difference between the CCI (Chlorophyll Content Index) and SPAD index scales?
Answer: CCI uses a linear scale, while SPAD uses a logarithmic scale.
The CCI (Chlorophyll Content Index) uses a linear scale, whereas the SPAD index uses a logarithmic scale.
For what specific types of plant stress are chlorophyll content meters commonly used?
Answer: Nutrient plant stress, including nitrogen and sulfur stress.
Chlorophyll content meters are commonly used for measuring nutrient plant stress, specifically including nitrogen stress and sulfur stress.
What is a common practice for establishing a fertilization reference when using chlorophyll content meters in the field?
Answer: Using a well-fertilized stand of crops in a specific field.
It is common to use a well-fertilized stand of crops in a specific field as the fertilization reference when using chlorophyll content meters.
According to one paper, what chlorophyll content index ratio (test plants to well-fertilized plants) suggests that fertigation should occur?
Answer: Below 95%
One paper suggests that when the ratio of the chlorophyll content index of test plants to well-fertilized plants drops below 95%, it is an indication that fertigation should occur.
What is an important condition for obtaining the best results from chlorophyll content measurements?
Answer: Measurements should ideally be made when water deficits are not present in the plants.
For the best results, chlorophyll content measurements should ideally be made when water deficits are not present in the plants.
Combining photosynthesis systems with fluorometers is particularly effective for studying cold stress and drought stress.
Answer: True
Combining photosynthesis systems with fluorometers is particularly effective for studying cold stress and drought stress, providing diagnostic insights into plant physiological responses.
Chlorophyll fluorometers are generally more expensive and less portable than photosynthesis systems.
Answer: False
Chlorophyll fluorometers are generally less expensive, offer faster measurement times, and tend to be more portable than photosynthesis systems.
Chlorophyll fluorometers are sensitive to both nitrogen and sulfur stress at usable levels.
Answer: False
Chlorophyll fluorometers require a special assay to measure nitrogen stress at usable levels and will only detect sulfur stress at starvation levels, unlike chlorophyll content meters.
Combining photosynthesis systems with fluorometers is particularly effective for studying which types of plant stress?
Answer: Cold stress and drought stress.
Combining photosynthesis systems with fluorometers is particularly effective for studying cold stress and drought stress, providing diagnostic insights into plant physiological responses.
What are the advantages of chlorophyll fluorometers compared to photosynthesis systems for field measurements?
Answer: They are generally less expensive, offer faster measurement times, and tend to be more portable.
Chlorophyll fluorometers are generally less expensive, offer faster measurement times, and tend to be more portable, making them important for field measurements.