Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
In plurality voting systems, candidates are elected solely based on receiving more than 50% of the total votes cast.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. Plurality voting requires a candidate to receive the most votes, not necessarily more than 50% of the total votes cast. Achieving over 50% constitutes a majority, which is a distinct electoral condition.
The First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system mandates that a candidate must secure an absolute majority of votes to be declared the winner.
Answer: False
This assertion is incorrect. FPTP is a plurality system, meaning the candidate with the highest number of votes wins, irrespective of whether that number constitutes an absolute majority (more than 50%).
Which electoral system designates the candidate who receives more votes than any other single candidate, irrespective of whether they attain an absolute majority?
Answer: Plurality voting
Plurality voting systems elect the candidate with the highest number of votes, which may not necessarily exceed 50% of the total votes cast.
What is the fundamental distinction between a two-round system and First-Past-The-Post (FPTP)?
Answer: The two-round system requires a candidate to win an absolute majority to win in the first round, unlike FPTP.
The primary difference lies in the winning condition for the first round: FPTP elects the candidate with the most votes (a plurality), whereas a two-round system typically requires an absolute majority (over 50%) to win outright in the first round, necessitating a runoff if this threshold is not met.
The 'winner-takes-all' principle, as applied in single-member districts, signifies that:
Answer: The winning candidate receives the seat, while votes for other candidates do not contribute to representation for that district.
This principle dictates that the candidate securing the plurality of votes wins the sole seat for the district, rendering votes for non-winning candidates inconsequential for representation in that specific district.
Within plurality block voting systems, each voter casts a single vote, irrespective of the number of seats being contested.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. In plurality block voting, voters cast multiple votes, typically equal to the number of seats available in the district.
The limited voting system permits electors to cast a quantity of votes equivalent to the total number of seats available within a multi-member district.
Answer: False
This is inaccurate. Limited voting systems require voters to cast fewer votes than the number of seats available, distinguishing it from systems where voters can cast votes equal to the number of seats.
The Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV) system permits voters to cast multiple votes within multi-member electoral districts.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. In the SNTV system, voters are restricted to casting only a single vote, even in districts where multiple representatives are to be elected.
Party block voting, also referred to as general ticket plurality, is an electoral mechanism wherein the party securing the most votes claims all available seats within a given district.
Answer: True
This statement accurately describes party block voting, where the party that garnishes the highest number of votes wins all seats in the district.
Plurality block voting and party block voting represent identical electoral mechanisms for multi-winner districts.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. While both are plurality systems for multi-winner districts, plurality block voting allows voters to cast votes for individual candidates, whereas party block voting is list-based, awarding all seats to the winning party.
What is the widely recognized designation for the single-member district plurality voting system?
Answer: First-past-the-post (FPTP)
The single-member district plurality voting system is commonly known as First-Past-The-Post (FPTP).
Within which multi-winner plurality electoral system do voters cast a number of votes equivalent to the number of seats available?
Answer: Plurality Block Voting
Plurality block voting is characterized by voters casting as many votes as there are seats to be filled in a multi-member district.
What defining characteristic distinguishes the 'Limited Voting' system within multi-member districts?
Answer: Voters cast more votes than one, but fewer votes than the number of seats.
Limited voting is defined by electors casting more votes than one, but fewer votes than the total number of seats available in the district.
Which electoral system, utilized in multi-member districts, permits only a single vote per elector yet operates on a semi-proportional basis?
Answer: Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV)
The Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV) system employs a single vote per voter in multi-member districts and is considered a semi-proportional method.
What is an alternative designation for 'Party Block Voting'?
Answer: General Ticket Plurality
Party Block Voting is also commonly referred to as General Ticket Plurality.
Which characteristic is associated with the 'Party Block Voting' system?
Answer: The party winning the most votes in a district wins all the seats for that district.
A key characteristic of Party Block Voting is that the political party securing the plurality of votes in a district wins all available seats for that district.
In plurality voting systems, the designation of 'wasted votes' exclusively encompasses ballots cast for candidates who fail to win the election.
Answer: False
This is inaccurate. 'Wasted votes' in plurality systems include not only votes for losing candidates but also any surplus votes cast for a winning candidate beyond what was necessary for their victory.
The phenomenon known as the spoiler effect may result in the election of a candidate who is less favored by voters who initially supported a third-party candidate.
Answer: True
This statement accurately describes the spoiler effect, wherein votes for a minor candidate can inadvertently cause a more preferred major candidate to lose.
Tactical voting is characterized by electors selecting their most preferred candidate, without consideration for that candidate's likelihood of winning the election.
Answer: False
This definition is incorrect. Tactical voting occurs when a voter casts a ballot for a candidate they perceive as more viable, rather than their most preferred candidate, in an effort to influence the election's outcome.
The practice of gerrymandering exhibits diminished effectiveness within plurality voting systems when contrasted with proportional representation systems.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. Plurality voting systems, particularly those with single-member districts, are highly susceptible to gerrymandering, as boundary manipulation can create 'safe seats' and dilute opposition votes.
Duverger's Law posits that electoral systems employing plurality voting mechanisms foster the proliferation of more than two dominant political parties.
Answer: False
This statement contradicts Duverger's Law. The law suggests that plurality voting systems, especially those using the first-past-the-post method, tend to consolidate political competition into a two-party system.
The 'winner-takes-all' principle inherent in single-member plurality systems guarantees representation for every candidate who receives votes.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. The 'winner-takes-all' principle ensures representation only for the single candidate who wins the election in that district; votes for all other candidates do not result in representation.
The 'spoiler effect' is less probable in electoral systems designed to elect only a single representative.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. The spoiler effect is a significant concern precisely in single-winner elections, where votes cast for a minor candidate can alter the outcome between the major contenders.
Plurality voting systems face criticism for potentially diminishing voter turnout, stemming from sentiments of disenfranchisement among the electorate.
Answer: True
This statement is accurate. The structure of plurality systems, particularly in 'safe seats,' can lead voters to feel their participation is inconsequential, potentially reducing turnout.
The United Kingdom's adoption of the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system frequently leads to smaller parties securing a disproportionately large number of parliamentary seats relative to their overall vote share.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. The UK's FPTP system typically results in smaller parties receiving a disproportionately *small* number of seats compared to their vote share, often leading to significant disproportionality.
The 'spoiler effect' constitutes a primary concern predominantly within multi-winner electoral contests.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. The spoiler effect is a significant issue primarily in single-winner elections, where votes cast for a minor candidate can alter the outcome between the major contenders.
Duverger's Law provides an explanation for how plurality voting might foster the development of a multi-party system.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. Duverger's Law posits that plurality voting systems, particularly first-past-the-post, tend to encourage a two-party system, not a multi-party system.
The 'winner-takes-all' characteristic of the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system can result in significant disproportionality between a party's share of the popular vote and its allocation of seats.
Answer: True
This statement is accurate. The winner-takes-all nature of FPTP often leads to outcomes where the distribution of seats does not closely reflect the overall distribution of votes.
What is the principal criticism leveled against the phenomenon of 'wasted votes' within plurality systems such as FPTP?
Answer: They include votes for losing candidates and surplus votes for winners, reducing overall representation.
The primary criticism is that 'wasted votes' encompass ballots for losing candidates and surplus votes for winners, thereby diminishing the overall representational efficacy of the electoral system.
In plurality voting, which category of candidate is most likely to benefit from the 'spoiler effect'?
Answer: A candidate who draws votes away from a major candidate with similar views.
The spoiler effect typically benefits a candidate whose vote draw is similar to that of a major contender, potentially causing the major contender to lose.
Under a plurality system, what is a common motivation for a voter to engage in 'tactical voting'?
Answer: To vote for a candidate more likely to win, rather than their most preferred candidate, to avoid 'wasting' their vote.
Voters engage in tactical voting in plurality systems to support a candidate perceived as more viable, thereby preventing their vote from being 'wasted' on a candidate unlikely to win, even if that candidate is their true preference.
In what manner does gerrymandering leverage the characteristics of plurality voting systems?
Answer: By manipulating boundaries to create 'safe seats' and dilute opposition votes, leveraging wasted votes.
Gerrymandering exploits plurality systems by manipulating district boundaries to create 'safe seats' for one party and dilute the opposition's voting power, effectively maximizing the number of 'wasted votes' for the opposing side.
As posited by Duverger's Law, what is the characteristic long-term consequence of first-past-the-post voting on a nation's party system?
Answer: It leads to a stable two-party system.
Duverger's Law predicts that first-past-the-post electoral systems tend to foster the development and maintenance of a stable two-party system.
In the context of the 2000 US Presidential Election, the 'spoiler effect' suggests that the candidacy of which individual may have influenced the final outcome?
Answer: Ralph Nader
The presence of Ralph Nader as a third-party candidate is often cited as a potential factor in the 2000 US Presidential Election, suggesting he may have drawn votes away from Al Gore, thereby influencing the outcome.
What is a potential consequence arising from plurality voting systems that tend to foster a two-party system?
Answer: Reduced incentive for voters to participate, leading to apathy.
A tendency towards a two-party system, driven by plurality voting, can reduce voter engagement as individuals may feel their vote has less impact or that the available choices are limited, potentially leading to political apathy.
Within the framework of plurality voting, what does the practice of 'tactical voting' imply?
Answer: Voting for a candidate likely to win, not necessarily the most preferred.
Tactical voting implies that an elector casts a ballot for a candidate perceived as more likely to win, rather than their most preferred candidate, to strategically influence the election's outcome.
The process of vote counting in plurality voting systems is generally more straightforward than in systems such as instant-runoff voting.
Answer: True
This statement is accurate. Plurality voting typically involves a simple tally of votes for each candidate, whereas systems like instant-runoff voting require more complex procedures involving vote transfers.
A principal argument advanced in support of plurality voting is its capacity to cultivate extensive coalition governments.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. Plurality voting systems are more commonly associated with the formation of single-party governments or, at best, limited coalitions, rather than broad ones.
Plurality voting systems are widely lauded for their efficacy in ensuring proportional representation.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. Plurality voting systems are frequently criticized for their *lack* of proportional representation, often leading to significant disproportionality between vote share and seat allocation.
Which of the following represents a frequently cited argument supporting plurality voting systems?
Answer: They are simple and familiar to voters and administrators.
A primary argument in favor of plurality voting is its simplicity and familiarity, making it accessible and understandable for both voters and election administrators.
The 'Majority criterion' stipulates that a candidate must secure the most votes, even if this total falls below 50% of the electorate's ballots.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. The Majority criterion requires that a candidate preferred by a majority (more than 50%) of voters must win the election. Plurality systems do not always satisfy this criterion.
Sir Peter Kenilorea contended that the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system, as implemented in the Solomon Islands, fostered political stability and encouraged a focus on policy development.
Answer: False
This assertion is inaccurate. Sir Peter Kenilorea argued that the FPTP system in the Solomon Islands contributed to political instability, encouraged voters to focus on material desires rather than policy, and made elections susceptible to corruption.
The 'efficiency gap' serves as a metric for quantifying the influence of gerrymandering on the results of elections.
Answer: True
This statement is accurate. The efficiency gap is a quantitative measure employed to assess the extent of partisan gerrymandering by analyzing the distribution of 'wasted votes'.
In the illustrative example concerning the Tennessee capital, the city that ultimately won the designation secured more than 60% of the total votes cast.
Answer: False
This statement is incorrect. In the Tennessee capital example, the winning city received 42% of the vote, which constituted a plurality but not a majority.
The United Kingdom's electorate voted against adopting the Alternative Vote (AV) system during a referendum held in 2011.
Answer: True
This statement is accurate. In the 2011 referendum, voters in the UK rejected the proposal to replace the existing first-past-the-post system with the Alternative Vote.
Canada employs a proportional representation system for the conduct of its national elections.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. Canada utilizes the first-past-the-post (FPTP) system, a form of plurality voting, for its federal elections, not a proportional representation system.
The 'no favorite betrayal' criterion implies that electors must rank their most preferred candidate first to ensure their vote is effectively counted.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. The 'no favorite betrayal' criterion posits that voters should not be penalized for voting sincerely for their favorite candidate; they should not have to vote strategically to achieve a desirable outcome.
The 'Independence of Clones' criterion is typically upheld by first-past-the-post electoral systems.
Answer: False
This statement is inaccurate. First-past-the-post systems generally fail the 'Independence of Clones' criterion, as the introduction or removal of similar candidates can alter the election outcome.
The calculation of the 'efficiency gap' entails a comparison of the wasted votes attributable to each political party.
Answer: True
This statement is accurate. The efficiency gap metric quantifies gerrymandering by comparing the number of 'wasted votes' for the two major parties.
What is the primary objective of the 'efficiency gap' metric in electoral analysis?
Answer: The degree of gerrymandering in electoral districts.
The efficiency gap metric is designed to quantify the extent of partisan gerrymandering by analyzing the distribution of 'wasted votes' between competing parties.
What potential outcome of plurality voting does the Tennessee capital election example serve to illustrate?
Answer: A candidate can win with a plurality, even if most voters preferred someone else.
The Tennessee example demonstrates how a candidate can win a plurality of votes without achieving majority support, meaning a majority of voters may have preferred a different outcome.
Among the countries cited, which one employs the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system for its general elections?
Answer: United Kingdom
The United Kingdom utilizes the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system for its general elections.
What was the outcome of the 2011 referendum held in the United Kingdom regarding electoral reform?
Answer: Voters rejected the proposal to switch to the Alternative Vote (AV) system.
In the 2011 referendum, the British electorate voted against adopting the Alternative Vote (AV) system.
Which electoral criterion is frequently violated by plurality systems, compelling voters to engage in strategic voting rather than expressing their genuine preference?
Answer: The No Favorite Betrayal Criterion
The 'No Favorite Betrayal' criterion is often violated in plurality systems, as voters may feel compelled to vote for a more viable candidate than their true favorite to avoid a less desirable outcome.
The 'Independence of Clones' criterion addresses the impact on election outcomes resulting from:
Answer: The addition or removal of candidates very similar to others.
This criterion concerns whether the introduction or withdrawal of candidates closely resembling existing contenders alters the election's result, which is a failure point for many plurality systems.
What contribution did Sir Peter Kenilorea identify regarding the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system in the Solomon Islands?
Answer: Political instability and susceptibility to corruption.
Sir Peter Kenilorea highlighted that the FPTP system in the Solomon Islands contributed to political instability and made elections vulnerable to corruption and undue influence.