Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



The R.38 Airship: Design, Service, and Tragedy

At a Glance

Title: The R.38 Airship: Design, Service, and Tragedy

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Design and Specifications: 13 flashcards, 7 questions
  • Development and Procurement: 8 flashcards, 14 questions
  • Operational Context and Testing: 9 flashcards, 14 questions
  • The Catastrophe: 10 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Inquiries and Analysis: 6 flashcards, 7 questions
  • Legacy and Impact: 3 flashcards, 5 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 49
  • True/False Questions: 34
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 22
  • Total Questions: 56

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The R.38 Airship: Design, Service, and Tragedy

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "R38-class airship" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The R.38 Airship: Design, Service, and Tragedy

Study Guide: The R.38 Airship: Design, Service, and Tragedy

Design and Specifications

Constructor-Commander C. I. R. Campbell was responsible for leading the design team of the R.38 class airships.

Answer: True

Design work for the R.38 class airships was conducted by an Admiralty team led by Constructor-Commander C. I. R. Campbell of the Royal Corps of Navy Constructors.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.
  • Who led the design work for the R.38 class airships?: Design work was conducted by an Admiralty team led by Constructor-Commander C. I. R. Campbell of the Royal Corps of Navy Constructors.

R.39 was planned as a variant of the R.38 class with a significantly reduced length.

Answer: False

R.39 was planned to be identical to the R.38. The variants R.40 and R.41 were planned with a reduced length due to manufacturing shed limitations.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the planned variants of the R.38 class, and why was their design modified?: The original plan included three more ships: R.39 (identical to R.38), and R.40 and R.41, which were variants with a reduced length of 690 feet. This reduction was necessary due to the limited size of existing manufacturing sheds.
  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

The R.38's hull contained 14 hydrogen-filled gasbags and featured 13-sided mainframes spaced approximately 50 feet apart.

Answer: True

The R.38's hull structure included 14 gasbags and 13-sided mainframes positioned approximately 49 feet apart, constructed from diamond-shaped trusses.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • Describe the internal structure of the R.38's hull.: The hull contained 14 hydrogen-filled gasbags. It featured 13-sided mainframes spaced 49 feet apart, constructed from diamond-shaped trusses. These were connected by 13 main and 12 secondary longitudinal girders, along with a trapezoidal keel. Two secondary ring frames were positioned between each pair of mainframes.
  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

Who was the lead designer for the R.38 class airships within the Admiralty team?

Answer: Constructor-Commander C. I. R. Campbell

Design work for the R.38 class airships was conducted by an Admiralty team led by Constructor-Commander C. I. R. Campbell of the Royal Corps of Navy Constructors.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

Why were R.40 and R.41 planned as variants with reduced length compared to the original R.38 design?

Answer: Due to limitations of existing manufacturing sheds.

The variants R.40 and R.41 were planned with a reduced length of 690 feet specifically because the existing manufacturing sheds were not large enough to accommodate the full length of the original R.38 design.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the planned variants of the R.38 class, and why was their design modified?: The original plan included three more ships: R.39 (identical to R.38), and R.40 and R.41, which were variants with a reduced length of 690 feet. This reduction was necessary due to the limited size of existing manufacturing sheds.

How were the six Sunbeam Cossack engines distributed on the R.38 airship?

Answer: In three pairs: one aft of the control car, one amidships, and one at the aft.

The six Sunbeam Cossack III engines were housed in individual cars and arranged in three pairs: one pair located aft of the control car, one pair amidships, and the third pair situated at the aft of the airship.

Related Concepts:

  • How were the engines arranged on the R.38 airship?: Six Sunbeam Cossack III engines were housed in individual cars. These were arranged in three pairs: one pair located aft of the control car, one pair amidships, and the third pair situated at the aft of the airship. Each engine drove a two-bladed pusher propeller.
  • How many Sunbeam Cossack III engines powered the R.38/ZR-2, and what was the horsepower of each?: The airship was powered by six Sunbeam Cossack III V-12 engines, each producing 350 horsepower (260 kW).

What were the key dimensions of the R.38/ZR-2 airship?

Answer: Length: 695 ft, Diameter: 85 ft 4 in

The R.38/ZR-2 airship had a length of 695 feet (212 meters) and a diameter of 85 feet 4 inches (26.01 meters).

Related Concepts:

  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

Development and Procurement

Four airships of the R.38 class were initially ordered; however, only the R.38 was completed following the armistice.

Answer: True

The Admiralty initially ordered four airships of the R.38 class. Following the armistice with Germany, orders for three of these—R.39, R.40, and R.41—were subsequently canceled, leaving only R.38 to be completed.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • How many airships of the R.38 class were initially ordered, and what happened to most of them?: The Admiralty initially ordered four airships of the R.38 class. Following the armistice with Germany, orders for three of these—R.39, R.40, and R.41—were subsequently canceled, leaving only R.38 to be completed.
  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.

The R.38 was sold to the United States Army Air Service after its completion.

Answer: False

The R.38 was sold to the United States Navy, not the Army Air Service, and was designated ZR-2 prior to its completion.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

The United States Navy requested modifications to the R.38's stern to improve its balance before completion.

Answer: True

The US Navy requested modifications, including adding weight to the stern, to ensure proper balance of the R.38 before its completion.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the planned variants of the R.38 class, and why was their design modified?: The original plan included three more ships: R.39 (identical to R.38), and R.40 and R.41, which were variants with a reduced length of 690 feet. This reduction was necessary due to the limited size of existing manufacturing sheds.
  • What structural modifications did the United States Navy request for the R.38 before its completion?: The US Navy requested modifications to the bow to allow mooring to a mast, access from the keel to the mast, and the addition of weight to the stern to ensure proper balance.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

The US Navy was interested in acquiring rigid airships after WWI partly because their attempts to secure Zeppelins as war reparations failed.

Answer: True

Following World War I, the US Navy sought to expand its fleet of rigid airships. Their initial efforts to obtain Zeppelins as war reparations were unsuccessful as German crews deliberately destroyed them.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was the United States Navy particularly interested in acquiring rigid airships after World War I?: The US Navy sought to expand its fleet with rigid airships. They initially hoped to obtain Zeppelins as war reparations, but these were deliberately destroyed by their crews.
  • What other rigid airships were the US Navy planning or building around the same time they acquired the R.38?: The US Navy had placed an order for a new Zeppelin (which became the USS Los Angeles) to be paid for by Germany, and they also planned to build one in the United States (which became the USS Shenandoah).

The USS Los Angeles was the only other large rigid airship the US Navy was pursuing around the time they acquired the R.38.

Answer: False

Around the time of acquiring the R.38, the US Navy was also pursuing the USS Shenandoah, which was built in the United States, in addition to ordering a Zeppelin that became the USS Los Angeles.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.

The United States Navy purchased the R.38 for £500,000.

Answer: False

The agreement for the purchase of the R.38 by the United States Navy was finalized for £300,000.

Related Concepts:

  • For how much did the United States Navy purchase the R.38?: The agreement for the purchase of the R.38 by the United States Navy was finalized in October 1919 for a sum of £300,000.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

Demands for economy from the Exchequer and the US Navy's commander Maxwell contributed to risks being taken with the R.38 project.

Answer: True

The confluence of demands for economy from the Exchequer and the influence of US Navy commander Maxwell led to risks being accepted in the R.38 project, despite contemporary concerns.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the text, what factors converged to cause risks to be taken with the R.38 project?: The demands of the Exchequer (for economy) and the US Navy's commander Maxwell converged to cause risks to be taken, which were questioned at the time but ignored with fatal consequences.

Following the armistice after World War I, what happened to the majority of the R.38 class airships initially ordered?

Answer: Three were canceled due to budget cuts.

The Admiralty initially ordered four airships of the R.38 class. Following the armistice with Germany, orders for three of these—R.39, R.40, and R.41—were subsequently canceled, leaving only R.38 to be completed.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • How many airships of the R.38 class were initially ordered, and what happened to most of them?: The Admiralty initially ordered four airships of the R.38 class. Following the armistice with Germany, orders for three of these—R.39, R.40, and R.41—were subsequently canceled, leaving only R.38 to be completed.
  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

What designation did the United States Navy give to the R.38 airship after purchasing it?

Answer: ZR-2

The R.38 was sold to the United States Navy and designated ZR-2 prior to its completion.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

What issue significantly complicated the manufacturing process for the R.38 after the contract was re-awarded?

Answer: Nationalization of the facility and confused responsibilities.

Following the re-ordering of the contract, the nationalization of the manufacturing facility at Cardington led to confused responsibilities between various authorities, significantly complicating the production process.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

Which modification did the US Navy request for the R.38's bow section?

Answer: To allow mooring to a mast.

The United States Navy requested modifications to the R.38's bow section to facilitate mooring to a mast and to allow access from the keel to the mast.

Related Concepts:

  • What structural modifications did the United States Navy request for the R.38 before its completion?: The US Navy requested modifications to the bow to allow mooring to a mast, access from the keel to the mast, and the addition of weight to the stern to ensure proper balance.

Why did the US Navy initially fail in their attempt to acquire German Zeppelins after WWI?

Answer: The German crews deliberately destroyed them.

The US Navy sought to obtain German Zeppelins as war reparations following World War I. However, their efforts were thwarted as the German crews deliberately destroyed the airships.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was the United States Navy particularly interested in acquiring rigid airships after World War I?: The US Navy sought to expand its fleet with rigid airships. They initially hoped to obtain Zeppelins as war reparations, but these were deliberately destroyed by their crews.
  • What other rigid airships were the US Navy planning or building around the same time they acquired the R.38?: The US Navy had placed an order for a new Zeppelin (which became the USS Los Angeles) to be paid for by Germany, and they also planned to build one in the United States (which became the USS Shenandoah).

Besides the R.38 (ZR-2), what other large rigid airship was the US Navy planning or building around the same time?

Answer: USS Shenandoah

Concurrent with its pursuit of the R.38 (ZR-2), the US Navy was also planning and constructing the USS Shenandoah, a large rigid airship built in the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

What was the purchase price agreed upon between the UK and the US Navy for the R.38?

Answer: £300,000

The agreement for the purchase of the R.38 by the United States Navy was finalized in October 1919 for a sum of £300,000.

Related Concepts:

  • For how much did the United States Navy purchase the R.38?: The agreement for the purchase of the R.38 by the United States Navy was finalized in October 1919 for a sum of £300,000.

Operational Context and Testing

During World War I, the R.38 class airships were initially conceived for reconnaissance missions over the North Sea.

Answer: True

The R.38 class airships were designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, with their intended role being long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.
  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

Upon its initial flight, the R.38 was recognized as the largest airship globally.

Answer: True

At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

The Admiralty required the R.38 class airships to patrol for a minimum of 10 days at altitudes up to 10,000 feet.

Answer: False

The Admiralty's performance requirements for the R.38 class included patrolling for six days at ranges up to 300 miles from base and reaching altitudes of up to 22,000 feet.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • What specific performance requirements did the Admiralty set for the R.38 class airships in June 1918?: The Admiralty's performance requirements for the R.38 class included patrolling for six days at ranges up to 300 miles from its base and reaching altitudes of up to 22,000 feet. A heavy armament load was also specified for escorting surface vessels.

J. E. M. Pritchard proposed 200 hours of flight testing for the R.38 before its handover.

Answer: False

J. E. M. Pritchard proposed a total of 150 hours of flight testing, comprising 100 hours of initial testing and an additional 50 hours to be flown by the American crew.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the proposed flight testing schedule for the R.38 before its handover to the US Navy?: J. E. M. Pritchard proposed 100 hours of flight testing, including flights in rough weather, followed by an additional 50 hours flown by an American crew before the transatlantic crossing.

Air Commodore Edward Maitland agreed with the abbreviated testing schedule proposed by Commander Maxfield.

Answer: False

Air Commodore Edward Maitland strongly disagreed with the abbreviated testing schedule, finding it 'appalling.' Commander Maxfield had advocated for completing tests in a single day.

Related Concepts:

  • Who disagreed with the proposed extensive testing schedule for the R.38, and what was the Air Ministry's final decision?: Commander Maxfield of the Howden Detachment disagreed, urging completion of tests in one day. Air Commodore Edward Maitland also disagreed, finding the abbreviated schedule appalling. The Air Ministry ultimately ruled that 50 hours of testing would be sufficient.
  • What advice did Air Commodore E. M. Maitland give regarding speed trials, and why was it significant?: Maitland urged that all future speed trials be conducted at higher altitudes, similar to the practice of the Germans when testing fragile Zeppelins, upon which the R.38 design was based. This advice was significant given the concerns about the airship's strength.

The R.38's first flight revealed issues with the engine performance.

Answer: False

The first flight of the R.38 revealed problems related to the over-balance of its control surfaces, not engine performance.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

During its third flight, the R.38 experienced failures in several girders near the aft engine cars.

Answer: False

During its third flight, the R.38 experienced failures in several girders located near the midship engine cars, not the aft ones.

Related Concepts:

  • What structural failures were observed during the third flight of the R.38 over the North Sea?: During the third flight, several girders in the vicinity of the midship engine cars failed. Specifically, girders of intermediate frame 7b and longitudinal Girder F failed in one place, while frame 7a and longitudinal F' each failed in two locations.
  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

Air Commodore E. M. Maitland advised conducting speed trials at higher altitudes, similar to German Zeppelin testing practices.

Answer: True

Air Commodore E. M. Maitland recommended that all future speed trials be conducted at higher altitudes, mirroring the practice used by the Germans when testing fragile Zeppelins, upon which the R.38 design was based.

Related Concepts:

  • What advice did Air Commodore E. M. Maitland give regarding speed trials, and why was it significant?: Maitland urged that all future speed trials be conducted at higher altitudes, similar to the practice of the Germans when testing fragile Zeppelins, upon which the R.38 design was based. This advice was significant given the concerns about the airship's strength.

What was the primary intended role of the R.38 class airships for the Royal Navy?

Answer: Long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • How many airships of the R.38 class were initially ordered, and what happened to most of them?: The Admiralty initially ordered four airships of the R.38 class. Following the armistice with Germany, orders for three of these—R.39, R.40, and R.41—were subsequently canceled, leaving only R.38 to be completed.
  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.

What record did the R.38 hold at the time of its initial flight?

Answer: Largest airship in the world.

At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.

Related Concepts:

  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

Which of the following was NOT among the performance requirements set by the Admiralty for the R.38 class in June 1918?

Answer: Operating at speeds exceeding 80 mph.

The Admiralty's performance requirements for the R.38 class included patrolling for six days, reaching altitudes of up to 22,000 feet, and maintaining a range of 300 miles from base. Operating at speeds exceeding 80 mph was not specified as a requirement.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

What was the total proposed flight testing duration recommended by J. E. M. Pritchard before the R.38's handover?

Answer: 150 hours

J. E. M. Pritchard proposed a total of 150 hours of flight testing for the R.38 before its handover, comprising 100 hours of initial testing and an additional 50 hours to be flown by the American crew.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the proposed flight testing schedule for the R.38 before its handover to the US Navy?: J. E. M. Pritchard proposed 100 hours of flight testing, including flights in rough weather, followed by an additional 50 hours flown by an American crew before the transatlantic crossing.

Which senior officer found the abbreviated testing schedule for the R.38 'appalling'?

Answer: Air Commodore Edward Maitland

Air Commodore Edward Maitland strongly disagreed with the abbreviated testing schedule proposed for the R.38, finding it 'appalling.'

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

What critical structural failures were observed during the R.38's third flight over the North Sea?

Answer: Failure of several girders near the midship engine cars.

During its third flight, the R.38 experienced failures in several girders located near the midship engine cars, indicating significant structural stress.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.
  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

The Catastrophe

The R.38 airship met its end in 1921 over the Humber Estuary, not the English Channel.

Answer: False

The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

Related Concepts:

  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.

The R.38's final flight was intended to reach RNAS Pulham for mooring to a mast.

Answer: True

The intended destination for the R.38 on its final flight was RNAS Pulham in Norfolk, where it could be moored to a mast, a facility not available at its departure point.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.

The R.38 broke apart during a low-speed ascent.

Answer: False

The R.38 broke apart during turning trials conducted at a speed of approximately 62.7 mph and an altitude of 2,500 feet, involving control reversals, not during a low-speed ascent.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

Eyewitnesses reported the R.38's hull cracking open and separating into two sections before crashing.

Answer: True

Eyewitness accounts described the hull creasing diagonally towards the stern, both ends drooping, the hull cracking open with crew members falling out, and the two main sections separating.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

Following the structural break-up, the aft section of the R.38 caught fire and exploded.

Answer: False

After the structural break-up, the forward section of the R.38 caught fire and exploded, while the aft section descended more slowly.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

The wreckage of the R.38 primarily fell onto the city of Hull.

Answer: False

The wreckage of the R.38 fell into the shallow waters of the Humber Estuary, adjacent to Hull, rather than directly onto the city itself.

Related Concepts:

  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

Flight Lieutenant Archibald Herbert Wann, the British Commanding Officer, was among those killed in the R.38 crash.

Answer: False

Flight Lieutenant Archibald Herbert Wann, the British Commanding Officer of the R.38, was one of the few survivors of the crash.

Related Concepts:

  • Who were the commanding officers present on the R.38 during its final flight, and what was their fate?: Air Commodore E. M. Maitland, the experienced commander of the Howden base, and J. E. M. Pritchard, the officer in charge of flight testing, were aboard and were killed in the crash. Flight Lieutenant Archibald Herbert Wann, R.38's British Commanding Officer, survived.

Rigger Norman Otto Walker was the only American crew member to survive the R.38 disaster.

Answer: True

Rigger Norman Otto Walker was indeed the sole American crew member to survive the catastrophic event.

Related Concepts:

  • Who was the sole American survivor of the R.38 disaster?: The only American to survive was Rigger Norman Otto Walker.

In which body of water did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship crash after its structural failure?

Answer: The Humber Estuary

The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

Related Concepts:

  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

Inquiries and Analysis

Commander Jerome Hunsacker and Charles Burgess expressed concerns about the R.38's structural integrity, noting a lack of safety factor.

Answer: True

Following girder failures during testing, Commander Jerome Hunsacker and Charles Burgess raised concerns. Burgess specifically concluded that the airship's transverses were barely adequate and lacked a sufficient safety factor.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.
  • What specific concerns were raised by US Navy personnel regarding the R.38's structural integrity?: Following significant girder failures during testing, Commander Jerome Hunsacker and Charles Burgess raised questions. Burgess concluded that the airship's transverses were only just strong enough and lacked a safety factor.

Only one official inquiry was held into the R.38 disaster.

Answer: False

Three separate official inquiries were convened to investigate the R.38 disaster.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

The first inquiry concluded that the structure failed due to extreme control forces and criticized the lack of independent design scrutiny.

Answer: True

The initial inquiry, chaired by Sir John Salmond, determined that the structure failed under extreme control forces and criticized the system where design and airworthiness inspection were handled by a single authority, suggesting insufficient scrutiny.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary conclusion of the first inquiry, chaired by Sir John Salmond?: This inquiry concluded that the structure failed while extreme control forces were being exerted. It also criticized the system where a single authority was responsible for both design and airworthiness inspection, suggesting the design should have undergone more thorough scrutiny.

The Admiralty's inquiry determined that the R.38's design incorporated several new features that compromised its strength.

Answer: False

The Admiralty's inquiry concluded that the R.38's design did not incorporate new features that compromised its strength, but rather that there was no existing body capable of adequately advising on its structural integrity at the time.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

The technical Committee of Enquiry found that the R.38's design adequately accounted for aerodynamic stresses.

Answer: False

The technical Committee of Enquiry, chaired by Mervyn O'Gorman, concluded that the R.38's design had made no allowance for aerodynamic stresses, which, when combined with the maneuvers performed, weakened the hull.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

What specific structural concern did Charles Burgess raise about the R.38's design after testing?

Answer: The transverses lacked a sufficient safety factor.

Following girder failures during testing, Charles Burgess concluded that the airship's transverses were barely adequate and lacked a sufficient safety factor, indicating a critical structural weakness.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

What did the technical Committee of Enquiry, chaired by Mervyn O'Gorman, conclude was the primary cause of the R.38's failure?

Answer: Inadequate allowance for aerodynamic stresses in the design.

The technical Committee of Enquiry concluded that the R.38's design had made no allowance for aerodynamic stresses. While it could withstand normal loads, the maneuvers performed introduced stresses that the structure could not safely endure.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the conclusion of the second inquiry, held by the Admiralty?: This inquiry concluded that the design did not incorporate new features affecting strength and stated that there was no existing body capable of advising on the structural strength of the R.38 at the time.

Legacy and Impact

The R.38 disaster had little impact on the design considerations for subsequent British airships.

Answer: False

The R.38 disaster significantly influenced the design of subsequent British airships, such as the R.100 and R.101, by prompting rigorous investigations into airship structures.

Related Concepts:

  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • What impact did the R.38 disaster have on the design of subsequent British airships?: The disaster led to a rigorous investigation of airship structures before the design of the next two British airships, the R.100 and the R.101.

The R.38 Memorial Prize was established to honor the airship's successful transatlantic flight.

Answer: False

The R.38 Memorial Prize was established in December 1922 by the Royal Aeronautical Society as an annual award for technical papers on airships, not to commemorate a successful flight.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.
  • What was the purpose of the R.38 Memorial Prize?: Established in December 1922 by the Royal Aeronautical Society, the prize was intended to be an annual award for technical papers on airships, open to international competition.

The first R.38 Memorial Prize was awarded for a paper on the airship's operational history.

Answer: False

The first R.38 Memorial Prize was awarded to C.P. Burgess, Jerome Hunsacker, and Starr Truscott for their paper titled 'The Strength of Rigid Airships,' focusing on structural integrity rather than operational history.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose of the R.38 Memorial Prize?: Established in December 1922 by the Royal Aeronautical Society, the prize was intended to be an annual award for technical papers on airships, open to international competition.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • What significant distinction did the R.38 hold at the time of its first flight?: At the time of its first flight, the R.38 held the distinction of being the largest airship in the world.

How did the R.38 disaster influence the design of subsequent British airships like the R.100 and R.101?

Answer: It prompted rigorous investigation of airship structures.

The R.38 disaster led to a rigorous investigation into airship structural integrity, which directly influenced the design considerations for subsequent British airships, including the R.100 and R.101.

Related Concepts:

  • What impact did the R.38 disaster have on the design of subsequent British airships?: The disaster led to a rigorous investigation of airship structures before the design of the next two British airships, the R.100 and the R.101.
  • What was the primary purpose for which the R.38 class airships were designed?: Designed for Britain's Royal Navy during the concluding months of the First World War, the R.38 class airships, also designated as the A class, were intended for long-range patrol duties over the North Sea.
  • When and where did the R.38 (ZR-2) airship meet its end, and what was the immediate consequence?: The R.38 (ZR-2) airship suffered catastrophic structural failure and was destroyed on August 24, 1921, over Hull, England, subsequently crashing into the Humber Estuary.

What type of prize was established in December 1922 in memory of the R.38 disaster?

Answer: An annual award for technical papers on airships.

Established in December 1922 by the Royal Aeronautical Society, the R.38 Memorial Prize was intended as an annual award for technical papers focusing on airship design and technology.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose of the R.38 Memorial Prize?: Established in December 1922 by the Royal Aeronautical Society, the prize was intended to be an annual award for technical papers on airships, open to international competition.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy