Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



ResearchGate: A Comprehensive Overview of the Academic Social Network

At a Glance

Title: ResearchGate: A Comprehensive Overview of the Academic Social Network

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • ResearchGate: Founding and Core Operations: 7 flashcards, 17 questions
  • Growth, Funding, and Business Strategy: 6 flashcards, 18 questions
  • Platform Features and User Interaction: 2 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Controversies: Ethics and Metrics: 8 flashcards, 23 questions
  • Legal and Copyright Challenges: 6 flashcards, 16 questions
  • Academic Impact and Demographics: 6 flashcards, 18 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 35
  • True/False Questions: 50
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 48
  • Total Questions: 98

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about ResearchGate: A Comprehensive Overview of the Academic Social Network

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "ResearchGate" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: ResearchGate: A Comprehensive Overview of the Academic Social Network

Study Guide: ResearchGate: A Comprehensive Overview of the Academic Social Network

ResearchGate: Founding and Core Operations

ResearchGate was initially launched in Berlin, Germany, before relocating its headquarters to Boston, Massachusetts.

Answer: False

ResearchGate was launched in May 2008, initially starting in Boston, Massachusetts, before relocating its headquarters to Berlin, Germany.

Related Concepts:

  • When was ResearchGate launched, and what is the current location of its headquarters?: ResearchGate was launched in May 2008. While it initially began in Boston, Massachusetts, its headquarters are now situated in Berlin, Germany.

One of ResearchGate's core functions is to enable scientists to share academic papers and find collaborators for their research.

Answer: True

ResearchGate's primary function is to facilitate the sharing of academic papers and help researchers find collaborators for their work.

Related Concepts:

  • What is ResearchGate, and what are its primary functions as an academic social networking site?: ResearchGate is a commercial social networking platform for scientists and researchers. Its core functions include facilitating the sharing of academic papers, enabling users to engage in question-and-answer forums, and assisting researchers in identifying potential collaborators for their projects.

Ijad Madisch, a computer scientist, co-founded ResearchGate and currently serves as its CEO.

Answer: False

Ijad Madisch, a virologist, co-founded ResearchGate and serves as its CEO. Horst Fickenscher is the computer scientist co-founder.

Related Concepts:

  • Who are the co-founders of ResearchGate, and what are their professional backgrounds?: ResearchGate was co-founded by virologist Ijad Madisch, who also holds the position of CEO, physician Sören Hofmayer, and computer scientist Horst Fickenscher.

ResearchGate members are restricted to uploading only peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers to their profiles.

Answer: False

ResearchGate members can upload a variety of research output, including papers, data, book chapters, negative results, patents, research proposals, methods, presentations, and software source code.

Related Concepts:

  • What diverse types of research output can members upload to their ResearchGate profiles?: ResearchGate members can upload a broad spectrum of research output to their profiles, including academic papers, datasets, book chapters, reports on negative results, patents, research proposals, methodological descriptions, presentations, and software source code.

To become a member of ResearchGate, an individual must have an email address from a recognized academic institution.

Answer: True

Individuals wishing to become site members must have an email address from a recognized institution or be manually confirmed as a published researcher.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the eligibility requirements for individuals seeking to become registered members of ResearchGate?: To become a registered member of ResearchGate, individuals must possess an email address from a recognized academic institution or undergo manual confirmation as a published researcher. Accessing articles, however, does not necessitate registration.

The New York Times described ResearchGate's platform as a unique, entirely novel social media concept with no parallels to existing sites.

Answer: False

The New York Times described ResearchGate's platform as a 'mashup' of popular social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, indicating parallels to existing sites.

Related Concepts:

  • How did The New York Times characterize ResearchGate's platform in terms of its social media features?: The New York Times characterized ResearchGate's platform as a 'mashup' of popular social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, reflecting its integration of personal networking, microblogging, and professional connection functionalities specifically adapted for the scientific community.

ResearchGate requires all uploaded materials to undergo a rigorous peer review process, similar to traditional academic journals.

Answer: False

ResearchGate does not require peer review for uploaded materials, which differs significantly from traditional academic journals.

Related Concepts:

  • How does ResearchGate's content submission policy diverge from that of traditional peer-reviewed academic journals?: ResearchGate's content submission policy differs from traditional academic journals in that it neither imposes fees for uploading materials nor mandates peer review for such content. This contrasts sharply with the typical submission fees and rigorous peer review processes characteristic of academic journals.

ResearchGate's content approach, which does not require peer review for uploaded materials, is a key difference from traditional academic journals.

Answer: True

ResearchGate does not require peer review for uploaded materials, a significant departure from the practices of traditional academic journals.

Related Concepts:

  • How does ResearchGate's content submission policy diverge from that of traditional peer-reviewed academic journals?: ResearchGate's content submission policy differs from traditional academic journals in that it neither imposes fees for uploading materials nor mandates peer review for such content. This contrasts sharply with the typical submission fees and rigorous peer review processes characteristic of academic journals.

What is the primary function of ResearchGate?

Answer: To facilitate the sharing of academic papers and help researchers find collaborators.

ResearchGate's primary function is to facilitate the sharing of academic papers, enable users to ask and answer questions, and help researchers find collaborators for their work.

Related Concepts:

  • What is ResearchGate, and what are its primary functions as an academic social networking site?: ResearchGate is a commercial social networking platform for scientists and researchers. Its core functions include facilitating the sharing of academic papers, enabling users to engage in question-and-answer forums, and assisting researchers in identifying potential collaborators for their projects.

In what year was ResearchGate launched?

Answer: 2008

ResearchGate was launched in May 2008.

Related Concepts:

  • When was ResearchGate launched, and what is the current location of its headquarters?: ResearchGate was launched in May 2008. While it initially began in Boston, Massachusetts, its headquarters are now situated in Berlin, Germany.

Who among the following is NOT listed as a founder of ResearchGate?

Answer: Matt Cohler

ResearchGate was founded by Ijad Madisch, Sören Hofmayer, and Horst Fickenscher. Matt Cohler was a partner at Benchmark who joined the board after the first funding round.

Related Concepts:

  • Who are the co-founders of ResearchGate, and what are their professional backgrounds?: ResearchGate was co-founded by virologist Ijad Madisch, who also holds the position of CEO, physician Sören Hofmayer, and computer scientist Horst Fickenscher.

Which of the following types of content can ResearchGate members upload to their profiles?

Answer: Papers, data, book chapters, and software source code.

Members can upload a variety of research output, including papers, data, book chapters, negative results, patents, research proposals, methods, presentations, and software source code.

Related Concepts:

  • What diverse types of research output can members upload to their ResearchGate profiles?: ResearchGate members can upload a broad spectrum of research output to their profiles, including academic papers, datasets, book chapters, reports on negative results, patents, research proposals, methodological descriptions, presentations, and software source code.

What is a requirement for individuals to become site members of ResearchGate?

Answer: An email address from a recognized institution or manual confirmation as a published researcher.

Individuals who wish to become site members must have an email address from a recognized institution or be manually confirmed as a published researcher.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the eligibility requirements for individuals seeking to become registered members of ResearchGate?: To become a registered member of ResearchGate, individuals must possess an email address from a recognized academic institution or undergo manual confirmation as a published researcher. Accessing articles, however, does not necessitate registration.

How did The New York Times describe ResearchGate's platform?

Answer: As a 'mashup' of popular social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

The New York Times described ResearchGate's platform as a 'mashup' of popular social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

Related Concepts:

  • How did The New York Times characterize ResearchGate's platform in terms of its social media features?: The New York Times characterized ResearchGate's platform as a 'mashup' of popular social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, reflecting its integration of personal networking, microblogging, and professional connection functionalities specifically adapted for the scientific community.

How does ResearchGate's approach to content differ from traditional peer-reviewed journals?

Answer: It does not charge fees for uploads nor require peer review for uploaded materials.

ResearchGate does not charge fees for users to upload content to its site, nor does it require peer review for uploaded materials, unlike traditional academic journals.

Related Concepts:

  • How does ResearchGate's content submission policy diverge from that of traditional peer-reviewed academic journals?: ResearchGate's content submission policy differs from traditional academic journals in that it neither imposes fees for uploading materials nor mandates peer review for such content. This contrasts sharply with the typical submission fees and rigorous peer review processes characteristic of academic journals.

ResearchGate's headquarters are located in which city?

Answer: Berlin, Germany

ResearchGate's headquarters are located in Berlin, Germany.

Related Concepts:

  • When was ResearchGate launched, and what is the current location of its headquarters?: ResearchGate was launched in May 2008. While it initially began in Boston, Massachusetts, its headquarters are now situated in Berlin, Germany.

What was the profession of ResearchGate co-founder Sören Hofmayer?

Answer: Physician

ResearchGate was co-founded by physician Sören Hofmayer.

Related Concepts:

  • Who are the co-founders of ResearchGate, and what are their professional backgrounds?: ResearchGate was co-founded by virologist Ijad Madisch, who also holds the position of CEO, physician Sören Hofmayer, and computer scientist Horst Fickenscher.

Growth, Funding, and Business Strategy

ResearchGate's user base grew from 25,000 in 2009 to over 1 million by 2011.

Answer: True

ResearchGate's user base expanded from 25,000 users in 2009 to more than 1 million users by 2011.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe ResearchGate's user growth trajectory during its initial years of operation.: ResearchGate demonstrated substantial user growth in its early operational period, increasing from 25,000 users in 2009 to over 1 million by 2011, reflecting its burgeoning appeal within the research community.

Bill Gates was among the investors in ResearchGate's Series A financing round in 2010.

Answer: False

Bill Gates contributed to ResearchGate's Series C financing round in June 2013, not the Series A round in 2010.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify some of the prominent investors who contributed to ResearchGate's early funding rounds.: ResearchGate secured funding from several notable investors. Benchmark led its initial round in 2010, followed by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund in February 2012. The Series C financing in June 2013 included a $35 million investment from individuals such as Bill Gates.

ResearchGate's business strategy, as described by its CEO, primarily focused on charging researchers subscription fees for premium features.

Answer: False

ResearchGate's business strategy, as articulated by CEO Ijad Madisch, focused on highly targeted advertising based on the analysis of user activities, not subscription fees.

Related Concepts:

  • What was ResearchGate's core business strategy, as outlined by CEO Ijad Madisch?: CEO Ijad Madisch described ResearchGate's business strategy as centered on highly targeted advertising, leveraging the analysis of user activities. He envisioned a model where users could directly purchase scientific products, such as a microscope mentioned in a paper, estimating the annual global expenditure on science at $1 trillion.

ResearchGate's employee count increased tenfold from 2011 to 2014.

Answer: True

ResearchGate's employee count grew from 12 in 2011 to 120 in 2014, which is a tenfold increase.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail ResearchGate's employee growth from 2011 to 2016.: ResearchGate demonstrated substantial employee growth, increasing from 12 employees in 2011 to 120 in 2014, and reaching approximately 300 employees by 2016, a figure that included a sales team of 100.

ResearchGate reported increasing profits in 2014 and 2015, indicating a strong financial position.

Answer: False

ResearchGate reported increasing financial losses, from €5.4 million in 2014 to €6.2 million in 2015.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe ResearchGate's financial performance in 2014 and 2015.: ResearchGate reported escalating financial losses in 2014 and 2015, with losses increasing from €5.4 million to €6.2 million, respectively. Despite these figures, the CEO maintained an optimistic outlook regarding the company's eventual path to profitability.

As of September 2023, ResearchGate reported having 15 million users.

Answer: False

As of September 2023, ResearchGate reported having 25 million users.

Related Concepts:

  • What was ResearchGate's reported user count as of September 2023?: As of September 2023, ResearchGate reported a user base of 25 million, signifying its ongoing expansion and influence within the global scientific and research community.

ResearchGate's initial funding round in 2010 was led by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund.

Answer: False

ResearchGate's first funding round in 2010 was led by Benchmark; Peter Thiel's Founders Fund led the second round in February 2012.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify some of the prominent investors who contributed to ResearchGate's early funding rounds.: ResearchGate secured funding from several notable investors. Benchmark led its initial round in 2010, followed by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund in February 2012. The Series C financing in June 2013 included a $35 million investment from individuals such as Bill Gates.

ResearchGate's CEO, Ijad Madisch, estimated that approximately $100 billion is spent on science annually.

Answer: False

ResearchGate's CEO, Ijad Madisch, estimated that $1 trillion is spent on science annually, not $100 billion.

Related Concepts:

  • What was ResearchGate's core business strategy, as outlined by CEO Ijad Madisch?: CEO Ijad Madisch described ResearchGate's business strategy as centered on highly targeted advertising, leveraging the analysis of user activities. He envisioned a model where users could directly purchase scientific products, such as a microscope mentioned in a paper, estimating the annual global expenditure on science at $1 trillion.

ResearchGate's employee growth included a sales staff of 100 by 2016.

Answer: True

By 2016, ResearchGate had approximately 300 employees, which included a sales staff of 100.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail ResearchGate's employee growth from 2011 to 2016.: ResearchGate demonstrated substantial employee growth, increasing from 12 employees in 2011 to 120 in 2014, and reaching approximately 300 employees by 2016, a figure that included a sales team of 100.

ResearchGate's financial losses increased from €5.4 million in 2015 to €6.2 million in 2014.

Answer: False

ResearchGate's financial losses increased from €5.4 million in 2014 to €6.2 million in 2015, not the other way around.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe ResearchGate's financial performance in 2014 and 2015.: ResearchGate reported escalating financial losses in 2014 and 2015, with losses increasing from €5.4 million to €6.2 million, respectively. Despite these figures, the CEO maintained an optimistic outlook regarding the company's eventual path to profitability.

What was ResearchGate's user growth from 2009 to 2011?

Answer: From 25,000 to over 1 million users.

ResearchGate's user base grew from 25,000 in 2009 to more than 1 million users by 2011.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe ResearchGate's user growth trajectory during its initial years of operation.: ResearchGate demonstrated substantial user growth in its early operational period, increasing from 25,000 users in 2009 to over 1 million by 2011, reflecting its burgeoning appeal within the research community.

Which notable investor contributed $35 million in Series C financing to ResearchGate in June 2013?

Answer: Bill Gates

Bill Gates was among the investors who contributed $35 million in Series C financing to ResearchGate in June 2013.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify some of the prominent investors who contributed to ResearchGate's early funding rounds.: ResearchGate secured funding from several notable investors. Benchmark led its initial round in 2010, followed by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund in February 2012. The Series C financing in June 2013 included a $35 million investment from individuals such as Bill Gates.

According to CEO Ijad Madisch, what was ResearchGate's primary business strategy?

Answer: Highly targeted advertising based on user activities.

CEO Ijad Madisch articulated ResearchGate's business strategy as focusing on highly targeted advertising based on the analysis of user activities.

Related Concepts:

  • What was ResearchGate's core business strategy, as outlined by CEO Ijad Madisch?: CEO Ijad Madisch described ResearchGate's business strategy as centered on highly targeted advertising, leveraging the analysis of user activities. He envisioned a model where users could directly purchase scientific products, such as a microscope mentioned in a paper, estimating the annual global expenditure on science at $1 trillion.

What was ResearchGate's approximate employee count by 2016?

Answer: 300

ResearchGate's employee count grew to approximately 300 employees by 2016.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail ResearchGate's employee growth from 2011 to 2016.: ResearchGate demonstrated substantial employee growth, increasing from 12 employees in 2011 to 120 in 2014, and reaching approximately 300 employees by 2016, a figure that included a sales team of 100.

What was ResearchGate's financial situation in 2015?

Answer: A loss of €6.2 million.

ResearchGate reported a financial loss of €6.2 million in 2015.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe ResearchGate's financial performance in 2014 and 2015.: ResearchGate reported escalating financial losses in 2014 and 2015, with losses increasing from €5.4 million to €6.2 million, respectively. Despite these figures, the CEO maintained an optimistic outlook regarding the company's eventual path to profitability.

As of September 2023, what was the reported user count for ResearchGate?

Answer: 25 million

As of September 2023, ResearchGate reported having 25 million users.

Related Concepts:

  • What was ResearchGate's reported user count as of September 2023?: As of September 2023, ResearchGate reported a user base of 25 million, signifying its ongoing expansion and influence within the global scientific and research community.

What was the employee count of ResearchGate in 2011?

Answer: 12

ResearchGate had 12 employees in 2011.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail ResearchGate's employee growth from 2011 to 2016.: ResearchGate demonstrated substantial employee growth, increasing from 12 employees in 2011 to 120 in 2014, and reaching approximately 300 employees by 2016, a figure that included a sales team of 100.

What was the financial loss reported by ResearchGate in 2014?

Answer: €5.4 million

ResearchGate reported a financial loss of €5.4 million in 2014.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe ResearchGate's financial performance in 2014 and 2015.: ResearchGate reported escalating financial losses in 2014 and 2015, with losses increasing from €5.4 million to €6.2 million, respectively. Despite these figures, the CEO maintained an optimistic outlook regarding the company's eventual path to profitability.

Platform Features and User Interaction

ResearchGate's features for user interaction include a blogging feature for short reviews of peer-reviewed articles and private chat rooms for discussing confidential topics.

Answer: True

ResearchGate offers a blogging feature for short reviews of peer-reviewed articles and private chat rooms for sharing data, editing shared documents, or discussing confidential topics.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific features does ResearchGate provide to facilitate user interaction and collaborative research?: ResearchGate offers features such as following research interests and other members, a blogging function for concise reviews of peer-reviewed articles, and a Q&A system that directs inquiries to users with pertinent expertise. Additionally, it includes private chat rooms for data sharing, collaborative document editing, and confidential discussions.

ResearchGate includes a job board specifically designed to connect researchers with employment opportunities in their fields.

Answer: True

ResearchGate features a research-focused job board that serves as a platform for connecting scientists and researchers with employment opportunities relevant to their fields.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the function of ResearchGate's dedicated job board?: ResearchGate incorporates a research-focused job board designed to connect scientists and researchers with pertinent employment opportunities, thereby enhancing the platform's professional development offerings.

ResearchGate's Q&A system is designed to field questions to users with relevant expertise.

Answer: True

ResearchGate offers a system that fields questions to users with relevant expertise as part of its interaction and collaboration features.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific features does ResearchGate provide to facilitate user interaction and collaborative research?: ResearchGate offers features such as following research interests and other members, a blogging function for concise reviews of peer-reviewed articles, and a Q&A system that directs inquiries to users with pertinent expertise. Additionally, it includes private chat rooms for data sharing, collaborative document editing, and confidential discussions.

Which of these is a feature offered by ResearchGate for user interaction and collaboration?

Answer: A system that fields questions to users with relevant expertise.

ResearchGate offers a system that fields questions to users with relevant expertise as a feature for user interaction and collaboration.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific features does ResearchGate provide to facilitate user interaction and collaborative research?: ResearchGate offers features such as following research interests and other members, a blogging function for concise reviews of peer-reviewed articles, and a Q&A system that directs inquiries to users with pertinent expertise. Additionally, it includes private chat rooms for data sharing, collaborative document editing, and confidential discussions.

What is the purpose of ResearchGate's 'job board' feature?

Answer: To connect scientists and researchers with employment opportunities.

ResearchGate's research-focused job board serves as a platform for connecting scientists and researchers with employment opportunities relevant to their fields.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the function of ResearchGate's dedicated job board?: ResearchGate incorporates a research-focused job board designed to connect scientists and researchers with pertinent employment opportunities, thereby enhancing the platform's professional development offerings.

Which of the following is NOT a feature of ResearchGate's user interaction and collaboration tools?

Answer: A system for anonymous peer review of submitted articles.

ResearchGate offers features like following research interests, a blogging feature, and private chat rooms, but not a system for anonymous peer review of submitted articles.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific features does ResearchGate provide to facilitate user interaction and collaborative research?: ResearchGate offers features such as following research interests and other members, a blogging function for concise reviews of peer-reviewed articles, and a Q&A system that directs inquiries to users with pertinent expertise. Additionally, it includes private chat rooms for data sharing, collaborative document editing, and confidential discussions.

Controversies: Ethics and Metrics

The 'RG Score' was a highly praised author-level metric known for its transparent calculation methodology and reliability.

Answer: False

The 'RG Score' was criticized for having questionable reliability and an unknown, intransparent calculation methodology.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'RG Score,' and what were the primary criticisms leveled against it?: The 'RG Score' was an author-level metric introduced by ResearchGate in 2012. It faced significant criticism for its questionable reliability, opaque calculation methodology, and lack of reproducibility. Concerns were also raised about its incorporation of the journal impact factor into user scores, leading to recommendations against its use in academic evaluations. ResearchGate discontinued the RG Score after July 2022.

ResearchGate was criticized for sending unsolicited email invitations that appeared to be personally sent by users, a practice it discontinued in November 2016.

Answer: True

ResearchGate faced criticism for sending unsolicited email invitations that were automatically generated and appeared personal, a practice it stated was discontinued as of November 2016.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific criticisms did ResearchGate encounter regarding its email invitation practices?: ResearchGate faced criticism for dispatching unsolicited email invitations to coauthors of its users' articles. These emails, which appeared to be personally sent but were automatically generated without explicit user consent (unless opted out), led to boycotts and a negative perception among some researchers. The platform stated it ceased this practice in November 2016.

ResearchGate readily removed automatically generated profiles for non-users upon request, addressing concerns about misrepresentation.

Answer: False

ResearchGate was criticized for often refusing to remove automatically generated profiles for non-users upon request, leading to concerns about misrepresentation.

Related Concepts:

  • What issues arose from ResearchGate's practice of automatically generating profiles for non-users?: ResearchGate was criticized for automatically creating profiles for non-users by aggregating affiliations, publication records, and PDFs from public web sources. This practice caused annoyance and a sense of misrepresentation among researchers who did not desire a presence on the site, particularly when requests for profile removal were denied.

The RG Score showed a strong positive correlation with network centrality, meaning the most active users typically had high scores.

Answer: False

The RG Score was found to be negatively correlated with network centrality, meaning that the most active users on ResearchGate typically did not have high RG scores.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the RG Score correlate with other academic and institutional metrics?: The RG Score exhibited correlations with existing author-level metrics. Notably, it showed a negative correlation with network centrality, implying that highly active users often did not possess high RG Scores. While it demonstrated a strong positive correlation with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level, its correlation with Elsevier SciVal rankings for individual authors was weak.

ResearchGate received widespread praise for its swift action in removing Benjamin Levin, a convicted sex offender, from its platform.

Answer: False

ResearchGate faced criticism for its decision not to remove Benjamin Levin, a convicted sex offender, from its platform, leading to protests and account deletions by other researchers.

Related Concepts:

  • What controversy arose concerning ResearchGate's handling of a convicted sex offender's presence on its platform?: ResearchGate drew significant criticism from Canadian authorities and the global research community for its refusal to remove Benjamin Levin, a convicted child pornographer and registered sex offender, from its platform. Levin, known as 'Research Ben,' had published numerous papers on ResearchGate, many related to child pornography and pedophilia, prompting protests and account deletions from other researchers.

A 2014 study found that a dormant ResearchGate account automatically generated hundreds of invitations and was attributed to a large number of publications without active user input.

Answer: True

A 2014 study found that a dormant ResearchGate account, using default settings, automatically generated 297 invitations and was attributed to more than 430 publications over a 16-month period.

Related Concepts:

  • What did a 2014 study reveal about automated activity and publication attribution on dormant ResearchGate accounts?: A 2014 study by the Association for Information Systems demonstrated that a dormant ResearchGate account, operating with default settings, automatically dispatched 297 invitations to 38 individuals over 16 months and was erroneously attributed to over 430 publications. This raised significant concerns regarding automated platform activity and the potential for misrepresentation of researchers' work.

ResearchGate directly hosts all PDF versions of articles found by its crawler on its own servers.

Answer: False

ResearchGate displayed scraped PDFs embedded in a frame, with an 'External Download' button indicating the file was not actually hosted directly on ResearchGate's servers.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ResearchGate display PDF articles that were scraped from external websites?: ResearchGate utilized a web crawler to locate PDF versions of articles on authors' and publishers' websites. These PDFs were then embedded within a frame on the ResearchGate platform, creating the impression that they were directly uploaded by the author, despite an 'External Download' button indicating that the files were not hosted on ResearchGate's servers.

ResearchGate was praised for its robust safeguards against unethical academic practices like predatory journals and fake impact ratings.

Answer: False

ResearchGate was criticized for failing to provide adequate safeguards against unethical academic practices such as fake publishers, 'ghost journals,' predatory publication fees, and fake impact ratings.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticisms were directed at ResearchGate regarding its safeguards against unethical academic practices?: ResearchGate faced criticism for its perceived inadequacy in safeguarding against 'the dark side of academic writing.' This encompassed concerns about its leniency toward issues such as fake publishers, 'ghost journals,' predatory publication fees, and fabricated impact ratings, all of which could undermine the integrity of the research disseminated on the platform.

The RG Score was removed by ResearchGate after July 2022 due to its widespread acceptance and reliability.

Answer: False

The RG Score was removed by ResearchGate after July 2022 due to criticisms regarding its questionable reliability and unknown calculation methodology.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'RG Score,' and what were the primary criticisms leveled against it?: The 'RG Score' was an author-level metric introduced by ResearchGate in 2012. It faced significant criticism for its questionable reliability, opaque calculation methodology, and lack of reproducibility. Concerns were also raised about its incorporation of the journal impact factor into user scores, leading to recommendations against its use in academic evaluations. ResearchGate discontinued the RG Score after July 2022.

The RG Score was noted to incorporate the journal impact factor into the user score.

Answer: True

The 'RG Score' was noted to incorporate the journal impact factor into the user score, which was a point of criticism.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'RG Score,' and what were the primary criticisms leveled against it?: The 'RG Score' was an author-level metric introduced by ResearchGate in 2012. It faced significant criticism for its questionable reliability, opaque calculation methodology, and lack of reproducibility. Concerns were also raised about its incorporation of the journal impact factor into user scores, leading to recommendations against its use in academic evaluations. ResearchGate discontinued the RG Score after July 2022.

The RG Score showed a strong positive correlation with Elsevier SciVal rankings of individual authors.

Answer: False

The RG Score showed only a weak correlation with Elsevier SciVal rankings of individual authors, though a strong positive correlation with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the RG Score correlate with other academic and institutional metrics?: The RG Score exhibited correlations with existing author-level metrics. Notably, it showed a negative correlation with network centrality, implying that highly active users often did not possess high RG Scores. While it demonstrated a strong positive correlation with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level, its correlation with Elsevier SciVal rankings for individual authors was weak.

Why was the 'RG Score' criticized?

Answer: It had questionable reliability and an unknown calculation methodology.

The 'RG Score' was criticized for having questionable reliability and an unknown, intransparent calculation methodology.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'RG Score,' and what were the primary criticisms leveled against it?: The 'RG Score' was an author-level metric introduced by ResearchGate in 2012. It faced significant criticism for its questionable reliability, opaque calculation methodology, and lack of reproducibility. Concerns were also raised about its incorporation of the journal impact factor into user scores, leading to recommendations against its use in academic evaluations. ResearchGate discontinued the RG Score after July 2022.

ResearchGate faced criticism for which of the following practices, discontinued in November 2016?

Answer: Sending unsolicited email invitations that appeared personal.

ResearchGate was criticized for sending unsolicited email invitations that appeared to be personally sent by users, a practice it discontinued in November 2016.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific criticisms did ResearchGate encounter regarding its email invitation practices?: ResearchGate faced criticism for dispatching unsolicited email invitations to coauthors of its users' articles. These emails, which appeared to be personally sent but were automatically generated without explicit user consent (unless opted out), led to boycotts and a negative perception among some researchers. The platform stated it ceased this practice in November 2016.

How did ResearchGate handle automatically generated profiles for non-users?

Answer: It scraped details from the web and often refused removal requests.

ResearchGate automatically generated profiles for non-users by scraping details from the web and was criticized for often refusing removal requests for these pages.

Related Concepts:

  • What issues arose from ResearchGate's practice of automatically generating profiles for non-users?: ResearchGate was criticized for automatically creating profiles for non-users by aggregating affiliations, publication records, and PDFs from public web sources. This practice caused annoyance and a sense of misrepresentation among researchers who did not desire a presence on the site, particularly when requests for profile removal were denied.

How did the RG Score correlate with network centrality?

Answer: Negative correlation.

The RG Score was found to be negatively correlated with network centrality, meaning that the most active users on ResearchGate typically did not have high RG scores.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the RG Score correlate with other academic and institutional metrics?: The RG Score exhibited correlations with existing author-level metrics. Notably, it showed a negative correlation with network centrality, implying that highly active users often did not possess high RG Scores. While it demonstrated a strong positive correlation with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level, its correlation with Elsevier SciVal rankings for individual authors was weak.

ResearchGate faced criticism for its decision regarding which individual?

Answer: A convicted sex offender who published papers on the site.

ResearchGate faced criticism for its decision not to remove Benjamin Levin, a convicted sex offender, from its platform.

Related Concepts:

  • What controversy arose concerning ResearchGate's handling of a convicted sex offender's presence on its platform?: ResearchGate drew significant criticism from Canadian authorities and the global research community for its refusal to remove Benjamin Levin, a convicted child pornographer and registered sex offender, from its platform. Levin, known as 'Research Ben,' had published numerous papers on ResearchGate, many related to child pornography and pedophilia, prompting protests and account deletions from other researchers.

A 2014 study by the Association for Information Systems highlighted issues with ResearchGate's automated activity, including a dormant account generating how many invitations over 16 months?

Answer: 297

A 2014 study found that a dormant ResearchGate account automatically generated 297 invitations to 38 people over a 16-month period.

Related Concepts:

  • What did a 2014 study reveal about automated activity and publication attribution on dormant ResearchGate accounts?: A 2014 study by the Association for Information Systems demonstrated that a dormant ResearchGate account, operating with default settings, automatically dispatched 297 invitations to 38 individuals over 16 months and was erroneously attributed to over 430 publications. This raised significant concerns regarding automated platform activity and the potential for misrepresentation of researchers' work.

How did ResearchGate display PDFs that were scraped from other websites?

Answer: It displayed them embedded in a frame, with an 'External Download' button.

ResearchGate displayed scraped PDFs embedded in a frame, appearing as if uploaded by the author, with an 'External Download' button indicating they were not hosted on ResearchGate's servers.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ResearchGate display PDF articles that were scraped from external websites?: ResearchGate utilized a web crawler to locate PDF versions of articles on authors' and publishers' websites. These PDFs were then embedded within a frame on the ResearchGate platform, creating the impression that they were directly uploaded by the author, despite an 'External Download' button indicating that the files were not hosted on ResearchGate's servers.

ResearchGate was criticized for failing to provide adequate safeguards against which of the following unethical academic practices?

Answer: Fake publishers and predatory publication fees.

ResearchGate was criticized for failing to provide adequate safeguards against unethical academic practices such as fake publishers, 'ghost journals,' publishers with 'predatory' publication fees, and fake impact ratings.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticisms were directed at ResearchGate regarding its safeguards against unethical academic practices?: ResearchGate faced criticism for its perceived inadequacy in safeguarding against 'the dark side of academic writing.' This encompassed concerns about its leniency toward issues such as fake publishers, 'ghost journals,' predatory publication fees, and fabricated impact ratings, all of which could undermine the integrity of the research disseminated on the platform.

The RG Score was removed by ResearchGate after which month and year?

Answer: July 2022

ResearchGate announced the removal of its 'RG Score' after July 2022.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'RG Score,' and what were the primary criticisms leveled against it?: The 'RG Score' was an author-level metric introduced by ResearchGate in 2012. It faced significant criticism for its questionable reliability, opaque calculation methodology, and lack of reproducibility. Concerns were also raised about its incorporation of the journal impact factor into user scores, leading to recommendations against its use in academic evaluations. ResearchGate discontinued the RG Score after July 2022.

What was the correlation between the RG Score and Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) university rankings at the institutional level?

Answer: A strong positive correlation.

The RG Score showed a strong positive correlation with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the RG Score correlate with other academic and institutional metrics?: The RG Score exhibited correlations with existing author-level metrics. Notably, it showed a negative correlation with network centrality, implying that highly active users often did not possess high RG Scores. While it demonstrated a strong positive correlation with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level, its correlation with Elsevier SciVal rankings for individual authors was weak.

What was the main reason for the criticism regarding ResearchGate's display of scraped PDFs?

Answer: They appeared to be uploaded by the author, but were not hosted directly on ResearchGate.

ResearchGate displayed scraped PDFs embedded in a frame, appearing as if they had been uploaded by the author, but were not hosted directly on ResearchGate's servers, leading to criticism.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ResearchGate display PDF articles that were scraped from external websites?: ResearchGate utilized a web crawler to locate PDF versions of articles on authors' and publishers' websites. These PDFs were then embedded within a frame on the ResearchGate platform, creating the impression that they were directly uploaded by the author, despite an 'External Download' button indicating that the files were not hosted on ResearchGate's servers.

Which of the following was NOT a criticism raised about ResearchGate's safeguards against unethical academic practices?

Answer: Failure to detect plagiarism in uploaded content.

Criticisms included leniency towards fake publishers, predatory publication fees, and fake impact ratings, but not specifically failure to detect plagiarism.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticisms were directed at ResearchGate regarding its safeguards against unethical academic practices?: ResearchGate faced criticism for its perceived inadequacy in safeguarding against 'the dark side of academic writing.' This encompassed concerns about its leniency toward issues such as fake publishers, 'ghost journals,' predatory publication fees, and fabricated impact ratings, all of which could undermine the integrity of the research disseminated on the platform.

Legal and Copyright Challenges

A study found that less than 10% of papers uploaded to ResearchGate infringed copyright, indicating strong adherence to publisher policies.

Answer: False

A study found that over half of the papers uploaded to ResearchGate appeared to infringe copyright because authors uploaded the publisher's version.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the primary copyright infringement issues associated with ResearchGate?: ResearchGate encountered substantial criticism for copyright infringement, as a study revealed that more than half of uploaded papers appeared to violate copyright due to authors sharing publisher-version PDFs. This issue prompted legal actions from major publishers and scientific associations.

The lawsuit between ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society was settled in September 2023.

Answer: True

ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society settled their lawsuit on September 15, 2023.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the lawsuit between ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society settled, and what was its objective?: The lawsuit involving ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society was settled on September 15, 2023. The settlement sought to balance support for researchers with the copyright concerns articulated by the publishers.

In January 2023, ResearchGate partnered with Springer Nature to distribute open access content.

Answer: False

In January 2023, ResearchGate partnered with Sage Publishing, not Springer Nature, to distribute open access content.

Related Concepts:

  • With which publisher did ResearchGate establish a partnership in January 2023 for open access content distribution?: In January 2023, ResearchGate formed a partnership with Sage Publishing to facilitate the distribution of open access content, thereby broadening the accessibility of research materials via its platform.

In September 2017, the STM demanded that ResearchGate implement pre-release checks for copyright violations on uploaded articles.

Answer: True

In September 2017, the STM demanded that ResearchGate alter its handling of uploaded articles to include pre-release checks for copyright violations.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific demands did the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) make to ResearchGate in September 2017?: In September 2017, the STM, through its legal representatives, demanded that ResearchGate implement pre-release checks for copyright violations on uploaded articles, cease extracting and modifying content and metadata from hosted articles, and discontinue copying and downloading published journal content to build internal databases. These demands were made under threat of legal action for copyright infringement.

The Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS) supported legal action against ResearchGate, with major publishers like Elsevier and Wiley signing their statement.

Answer: True

The Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS) issued a statement supporting legal action against ResearchGate, signed by major publishers including Elsevier and Wiley.

Related Concepts:

  • Which major publishers supported the legal action against ResearchGate initiated by the Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS)?: The Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS) garnered support for its legal action against ResearchGate from several major publishers, including the American Chemical Society, Brill Publishers, Elsevier, Wiley, and Wolters Kluwer, all of whom signed its supporting statement.

ResearchGate's agreement with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme allowed these publishers to premoderate article uploads.

Answer: False

Under the agreement, publishers would be notified when their articles were uploaded to ResearchGate, but they would not have the ability to premoderate the uploads.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the terms of the agreement ResearchGate reached with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme regarding article uploads?: ResearchGate reached an agreement with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme concerning article uploads. This accord stipulated that these publishers would receive notifications when their articles were uploaded to ResearchGate, but they would not possess the authority to premoderate the content.

The settlement between ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society aimed to exclusively benefit publishers by restricting content sharing.

Answer: False

The settlement aimed to provide a solution to support researchers while addressing the copyright concerns raised by the publishers, not exclusively to benefit publishers.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the lawsuit between ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society settled, and what was its objective?: The lawsuit involving ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society was settled on September 15, 2023. The settlement sought to balance support for researchers with the copyright concerns articulated by the publishers.

The International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) demanded that ResearchGate cease extracting and modifying content from hosted articles.

Answer: True

The STM demanded that ResearchGate cease extracting and modifying content from hosted articles and metadata, among other requests, in September 2017.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific demands did the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) make to ResearchGate in September 2017?: In September 2017, the STM, through its legal representatives, demanded that ResearchGate implement pre-release checks for copyright violations on uploaded articles, cease extracting and modifying content and metadata from hosted articles, and discontinue copying and downloading published journal content to build internal databases. These demands were made under threat of legal action for copyright infringement.

ResearchGate's agreement with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme meant publishers would not be notified when their articles were uploaded.

Answer: False

Under the agreement, publishers would be notified when their articles were uploaded to ResearchGate, but they would not have the ability to premoderate.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the terms of the agreement ResearchGate reached with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme regarding article uploads?: ResearchGate reached an agreement with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme concerning article uploads. This accord stipulated that these publishers would receive notifications when their articles were uploaded to ResearchGate, but they would not possess the authority to premoderate the content.

What was a significant issue regarding copyright infringement on ResearchGate?

Answer: Over half of uploaded papers appeared to infringe copyright due to authors uploading publisher's versions.

A study found that over half of the papers uploaded to ResearchGate appeared to infringe copyright because authors uploaded the publisher's version.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the primary copyright infringement issues associated with ResearchGate?: ResearchGate encountered substantial criticism for copyright infringement, as a study revealed that more than half of uploaded papers appeared to violate copyright due to authors sharing publisher-version PDFs. This issue prompted legal actions from major publishers and scientific associations.

When was the lawsuit between ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society settled?

Answer: September 2023

The lawsuit between ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society was settled on September 15, 2023.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the lawsuit between ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society settled, and what was its objective?: The lawsuit involving ResearchGate, Elsevier, and the American Chemical Society was settled on September 15, 2023. The settlement sought to balance support for researchers with the copyright concerns articulated by the publishers.

With which publisher did ResearchGate partner in January 2023 to distribute open access content?

Answer: Sage Publishing

In January 2023, ResearchGate partnered with Sage Publishing to distribute open access content.

Related Concepts:

  • With which publisher did ResearchGate establish a partnership in January 2023 for open access content distribution?: In January 2023, ResearchGate formed a partnership with Sage Publishing to facilitate the distribution of open access content, thereby broadening the accessibility of research materials via its platform.

In September 2017, what was one of the key demands made by the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) to ResearchGate?

Answer: To implement pre-release checks for copyright violations on uploaded articles.

The STM demanded that ResearchGate implement pre-release checks for copyright violations on uploaded articles, among other requests.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific demands did the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) make to ResearchGate in September 2017?: In September 2017, the STM, through its legal representatives, demanded that ResearchGate implement pre-release checks for copyright violations on uploaded articles, cease extracting and modifying content and metadata from hosted articles, and discontinue copying and downloading published journal content to build internal databases. These demands were made under threat of legal action for copyright infringement.

Which of the following publishers signed the statement by the Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS) supporting legal action against ResearchGate?

Answer: Elsevier

Elsevier was among several major publishers who signed the statement by the Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS) supporting legal action against ResearchGate.

Related Concepts:

  • Which major publishers supported the legal action against ResearchGate initiated by the Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS)?: The Coalition for Responsible Sharing (CfRS) garnered support for its legal action against ResearchGate from several major publishers, including the American Chemical Society, Brill Publishers, Elsevier, Wiley, and Wolters Kluwer, all of whom signed its supporting statement.

What was a key aspect of the agreement ResearchGate reached with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme regarding article uploads?

Answer: Publishers would be notified of uploads but could not premoderate.

Under the agreement, publishers would be notified when their articles were uploaded to ResearchGate, but they would not have the ability to premoderate the uploads.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the terms of the agreement ResearchGate reached with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme regarding article uploads?: ResearchGate reached an agreement with Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press, and Thieme concerning article uploads. This accord stipulated that these publishers would receive notifications when their articles were uploaded to ResearchGate, but they would not possess the authority to premoderate the content.

Which of the following was NOT a demand made by the STM to ResearchGate in September 2017?

Answer: Require all users to pay a fee for uploading articles.

The STM's demands included pre-release checks for copyright, ceasing content extraction/modification, and stopping the creation of internal databases from published content, but not requiring users to pay upload fees.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific demands did the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) make to ResearchGate in September 2017?: In September 2017, the STM, through its legal representatives, demanded that ResearchGate implement pre-release checks for copyright violations on uploaded articles, cease extracting and modifying content and metadata from hosted articles, and discontinue copying and downloading published journal content to build internal databases. These demands were made under threat of legal action for copyright infringement.

Academic Impact and Demographics

A 2014 study indicated that ResearchGate was the largest academic social network in terms of active users, despite other services potentially having more registered users.

Answer: True

A 2014 study by Nature and a 2016 article in Times Higher Education indicated that ResearchGate was the largest academic social network in terms of active users, though other services might have more registered users.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ResearchGate's active user base compare to other academic social networks, according to studies in 2014 and 2016?: A 2014 study by Nature and a 2016 article in Times Higher Education identified ResearchGate as the largest academic social network by active users, although other platforms might have more registered users. A 2015–2016 survey also noted that Google Scholar maintained a comparable number of academic profiles.

A 2009 BusinessWeek article highlighted ResearchGate's potential to promote innovation by connecting scientists in developing countries with their peers in industrialized nations.

Answer: True

A 2009 BusinessWeek article described ResearchGate as a 'potentially powerful link' for promoting innovation in developing countries by connecting scientists globally.

Related Concepts:

  • How did a 2009 BusinessWeek article characterize ResearchGate's potential impact on innovation, particularly in developing countries?: A 2009 BusinessWeek article lauded ResearchGate as a 'potentially powerful link' for fostering innovation in developing countries. It emphasized the platform's capacity to connect scientists globally, attributing its appeal to its user-friendliness and its role in significant international collaborations.

Academic reception of ResearchGate has been overwhelmingly negative, with most academics refusing to use it.

Answer: False

Academic reception of ResearchGate has been generally positive, with an accepting audience, though often used as an 'online CV'.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the general academic reception of ResearchGate, and how is it often utilized by researchers?: Academic reception of ResearchGate has been largely positive, with literature reviews indicating an accepting user base and comprehensive conceptual coverage. However, some studies suggest that many academics primarily use the platform as an 'online CV' rather than for extensive question-and-answer interactions.

As of 2014, China had a particularly high number of ResearchGate users compared to its number of publishing researchers.

Answer: False

As of 2014, China had relatively few ResearchGate users when compared to its number of publishing researchers, while Brazil had a particularly high number.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the international distribution of ResearchGate users as observed in 2014.: In 2014, the international adoption of ResearchGate was uneven. Brazil, for instance, exhibited a notably high number of users, whereas China had comparatively fewer users relative to its population of publishing researchers.

While ResearchGate attracts users from diverse fields, the majority are involved in medicine or biology.

Answer: True

Most of ResearchGate's users are involved in medicine or biology, although it attracts participants from a diverse range of other fields.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the predominant professional fields of ResearchGate users, and what other disciplines are represented?: While the majority of ResearchGate users are engaged in medicine or biology, the platform also draws participants from a wide array of other fields, including engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology.

The widespread use of ResearchGate contributed to 'big deal' cancellations by library systems due to reduced perceived value of 'toll access' subscriptions.

Answer: True

The widespread usage of ResearchGate was identified as a factor that reduced the apparent value of subscriptions to 'toll access' resources, leading to 'big deal' cancellations by several library systems worldwide.

Related Concepts:

  • What impact did the widespread adoption of ResearchGate have on library subscriptions to 'toll access' resources?: The extensive use of ResearchGate was cited as a contributing factor to the diminished perceived value of 'toll access' journal subscriptions, resulting in 'big deal' cancellations by numerous library systems globally. This indicated that researchers could access content via ResearchGate, thereby reducing their dependence on costly journal subscriptions.

The 2015–2016 survey indicated that Google Scholar had significantly fewer academic profiles than ResearchGate.

Answer: False

A 2015–2016 survey indicated that Google Scholar had almost as many academic profiles as ResearchGate.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ResearchGate's active user base compare to other academic social networks, according to studies in 2014 and 2016?: A 2014 study by Nature and a 2016 article in Times Higher Education identified ResearchGate as the largest academic social network by active users, although other platforms might have more registered users. A 2015–2016 survey also noted that Google Scholar maintained a comparable number of academic profiles.

ResearchGate's popularity in developing countries was attributed to its complex interface and limited cross-country collaboration features.

Answer: False

ResearchGate's popularity in developing countries was attributed to its ease of use and its involvement in notable cross-country collaborations, not a complex interface or limited features.

Related Concepts:

  • How did a 2009 BusinessWeek article characterize ResearchGate's potential impact on innovation, particularly in developing countries?: A 2009 BusinessWeek article lauded ResearchGate as a 'potentially powerful link' for fostering innovation in developing countries. It emphasized the platform's capacity to connect scientists globally, attributing its appeal to its user-friendliness and its role in significant international collaborations.

ResearchGate's user base includes participants from fields such as engineering, law, and psychology, in addition to medicine and biology.

Answer: True

While most users are in medicine or biology, ResearchGate also attracts participants from engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the predominant professional fields of ResearchGate users, and what other disciplines are represented?: While the majority of ResearchGate users are engaged in medicine or biology, the platform also draws participants from a wide array of other fields, including engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology.

According to a 2014 study by Nature, how did ResearchGate compare to other academic social networks?

Answer: It was the largest in terms of active users.

A 2014 study by Nature indicated that ResearchGate was the largest academic social network in terms of active users.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ResearchGate's active user base compare to other academic social networks, according to studies in 2014 and 2016?: A 2014 study by Nature and a 2016 article in Times Higher Education identified ResearchGate as the largest academic social network by active users, although other platforms might have more registered users. A 2015–2016 survey also noted that Google Scholar maintained a comparable number of academic profiles.

A 2009 BusinessWeek article described ResearchGate as a 'potentially powerful link' for promoting innovation in which context?

Answer: In developing countries by connecting scientists globally.

A 2009 BusinessWeek article highlighted ResearchGate's potential to promote innovation in developing countries by connecting scientists from these nations with their peers in industrialized nations.

Related Concepts:

  • How did a 2009 BusinessWeek article characterize ResearchGate's potential impact on innovation, particularly in developing countries?: A 2009 BusinessWeek article lauded ResearchGate as a 'potentially powerful link' for fostering innovation in developing countries. It emphasized the platform's capacity to connect scientists globally, attributing its appeal to its user-friendliness and its role in significant international collaborations.

What was the general academic reception of ResearchGate?

Answer: Generally positive, with an accepting audience, though often used as an 'online CV'.

Academic reception of ResearchGate has been generally positive, with an accepting audience, though some studies noted it is often used as an 'online CV'.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the general academic reception of ResearchGate, and how is it often utilized by researchers?: Academic reception of ResearchGate has been largely positive, with literature reviews indicating an accepting user base and comprehensive conceptual coverage. However, some studies suggest that many academics primarily use the platform as an 'online CV' rather than for extensive question-and-answer interactions.

As of 2014, which country had a particularly high number of ResearchGate users?

Answer: Brazil

As of 2014, Brazil had a particularly high number of ResearchGate users, while China had relatively few.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the international distribution of ResearchGate users as observed in 2014.: In 2014, the international adoption of ResearchGate was uneven. Brazil, for instance, exhibited a notably high number of users, whereas China had comparatively fewer users relative to its population of publishing researchers.

What is the primary professional field of most ResearchGate users?

Answer: Medicine or biology

Most of ResearchGate's users are involved in medicine or biology, though it attracts participants from diverse fields.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the predominant professional fields of ResearchGate users, and what other disciplines are represented?: While the majority of ResearchGate users are engaged in medicine or biology, the platform also draws participants from a wide array of other fields, including engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology.

The widespread usage of ResearchGate was identified as a factor contributing to what phenomenon?

Answer: 'Big deal' cancellations by library systems worldwide.

The widespread usage of ResearchGate was identified as a factor that reduced the apparent value of subscriptions to 'toll access' resources, leading to 'big deal' cancellations by several library systems worldwide.

Related Concepts:

  • What impact did the widespread adoption of ResearchGate have on library subscriptions to 'toll access' resources?: The extensive use of ResearchGate was cited as a contributing factor to the diminished perceived value of 'toll access' journal subscriptions, resulting in 'big deal' cancellations by numerous library systems globally. This indicated that researchers could access content via ResearchGate, thereby reducing their dependence on costly journal subscriptions.

What did a 2015–2016 survey indicate about Google Scholar compared to ResearchGate in terms of academic profiles?

Answer: Google Scholar had almost as many profiles.

A 2015–2016 survey indicated that Google Scholar had almost as many academic profiles as ResearchGate.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ResearchGate's active user base compare to other academic social networks, according to studies in 2014 and 2016?: A 2014 study by Nature and a 2016 article in Times Higher Education identified ResearchGate as the largest academic social network by active users, although other platforms might have more registered users. A 2015–2016 survey also noted that Google Scholar maintained a comparable number of academic profiles.

What was the primary reason for ResearchGate's popularity in developing countries, according to a 2009 BusinessWeek article?

Answer: Its ease of use and involvement in cross-country collaborations.

ResearchGate's popularity in developing countries was attributed to its ease of use and its involvement in notable cross-country collaborations.

Related Concepts:

  • How did a 2009 BusinessWeek article characterize ResearchGate's potential impact on innovation, particularly in developing countries?: A 2009 BusinessWeek article lauded ResearchGate as a 'potentially powerful link' for fostering innovation in developing countries. It emphasized the platform's capacity to connect scientists globally, attributing its appeal to its user-friendliness and its role in significant international collaborations.

Which of the following fields is NOT explicitly mentioned as attracting participants to ResearchGate, besides medicine or biology?

Answer: History

ResearchGate attracts participants from engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology, in addition to medicine or biology, but history is not explicitly mentioned.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the predominant professional fields of ResearchGate users, and what other disciplines are represented?: While the majority of ResearchGate users are engaged in medicine or biology, the platform also draws participants from a wide array of other fields, including engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy