Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
Retailing in India contributed approximately 10 percent to the nation's GDP as of 2022.
Answer: True
As of 2022, the Indian retail sector was a significant contributor to the national economy, accounting for approximately 10 percent of the country's GDP.
India's retail market was estimated to be valued at $1.3 trillion in 2022.
Answer: True
The Indian retail market demonstrated substantial scale and growth, with an estimated valuation of $1.3 trillion in 2022.
India is considered one of the slowest-growing retail markets globally due to its small population.
Answer: False
The source identifies India as one of the fastest-growing retail markets globally, attributing this growth primarily to its substantial population of 1.4 billion people.
The Economist forecasted that by 2020, India's retail market growth would be equivalent to the size of Germany's retail market.
Answer: False
The Economist projected that by 2020, the growth in India's retail market would be equivalent to the retail market size of France, not Germany.
In 2011, food constituted 70% of India's retail market but was significantly under-represented by organized retail.
Answer: True
In 2011, food represented a dominant 70% share of India's retail market, yet it was notably under-represented by organized retail formats, indicating substantial room for expansion.
India has the highest retail space per capita globally, with 2 square feet per person.
Answer: False
India possesses the lowest retail space per capita globally, with approximately 2 square feet per person, contrasting with higher figures in developed nations.
What was the estimated market value of India's retail market in 2022?
Answer: 1.3 trillion dollars
The Indian retail market was estimated to be valued at $1.3 trillion in 2022.
Which factor is primarily attributed to India being one of the fastest-growing retail markets globally?
Answer: Its substantial population of 1.4 billion people
India's status as one of the fastest-growing retail markets globally is primarily attributed to its large population, estimated at 1.4 billion people.
The Economist forecasted that by 2020, India's retail market growth would be equivalent to the size of which country's retail market?
Answer: France
The Economist projected that by 2020, the growth in India's retail market would be equivalent to the retail market size of France.
In 2011, what percentage of India's retail market did food represent?
Answer: 70%
In 2011, food constituted a significant 70% of India's total retail market.
How does India's retail space per capita compare to global averages?
Answer: It is the lowest in the world.
India's retail space per capita is the lowest globally, standing at approximately 2 square feet per person.
In 2003, India's retailing industry was dominated by large, incorporated supermarket chains.
Answer: False
In 2003, India's retail landscape was predominantly characterized by small, owner-operated businesses, rather than large, incorporated supermarket chains.
By 2010, larger format convenience stores and supermarkets constituted about 40 percent of India's retail industry.
Answer: False
By 2010, larger format stores such as convenience stores and supermarkets represented a modest share, approximately 4 percent, of India's total retail industry.
The National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS) defines the 'Unorganized sector' as including only unincorporated private enterprises employing ten or more workers.
Answer: False
The NCEUS defines the 'Unorganized sector' as comprising unincorporated private enterprises that employ fewer than ten workers.
According to the NCEUS, an 'Organized sector' enterprise is characterized by being incorporated and employing more than ten workers.
Answer: True
The NCEUS defines 'Organized sector' enterprises as those that are incorporated and employ more than ten workers.
Organized retailing began actively emerging in India in the mid to late 1990s with formats like Shoppers Stop and Westside.
Answer: True
The emergence of organized retailing in India commenced in the mid to late 1990s, marked by the introduction of formats such as department stores like Shoppers Stop and Westside.
By 2010, what proportion of India's retail industry was represented by larger format convenience stores and supermarkets?
Answer: Only about 4 percent
By 2010, larger format convenience stores and supermarkets constituted a relatively small portion, approximately 4 percent, of India's overall retail industry.
How does the NCEUS define the 'Unorganized sector' in India?
Answer: All unincorporated private enterprises employing fewer than ten workers.
The National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS) defines the 'Unorganized sector' as encompassing all unincorporated private enterprises that employ fewer than ten workers.
Which of the following is an example of 'Organised retailing' in India?
Answer: A Saravana Stores adapting to market dynamics
Organised retailing includes licensed and registered businesses, as well as privately owned traditional large businesses that adapt to market dynamics, such as Saravana Stores.
When did organized retailing actively begin to emerge in India with formats like department stores?
Answer: In the mid to late 1990s
Organized retailing in India began its active emergence in the mid to late 1990s, characterized by the introduction of department store formats.
What did The Economist suggest about the future coexistence of retail formats in India?
Answer: Unorganized small shopkeepers would likely continue to exist alongside large supermarkets.
The Economist suggested that unorganized small shopkeepers would likely persist alongside large organized supermarkets, as they often provide the most accessible shopping option for many consumers.
Which of the following is an example of 'Unorganised retailing' according to the source?
Answer: A vendor operating from a pavement
Unorganised retailing encompasses traditional, low-cost formats such as vendors operating from pavements or handcarts.
India's central government announced reforms in November 2011 to permit foreign direct investment (FDI) in single-brand retail stores only.
Answer: False
The November 2011 reforms announced by India's central government permitted foreign direct investment (FDI) in both single-brand and multi-brand retail stores.
In December 2011, the Indian government decided to permanently halt all multi-brand retail reforms.
Answer: False
In December 2011, the Indian government placed the multi-brand retail reforms on hold pending further consensus, rather than permanently halting them.
India approved reforms allowing 100% foreign ownership in single-brand stores in January 2012.
Answer: True
In January 2012, India enacted reforms that permitted foreign entities to hold 100% ownership in single-brand retail operations.
A key condition for 100% foreign ownership in single-brand stores was that retailers must source at least 30% of their goods from Indian small and medium-sized enterprises.
Answer: True
The reforms allowing 100% foreign ownership in single-brand retail included a stipulation that retailers must source a minimum of 30% of their goods from Indian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), village industries, artisans, and craftsmen.
Between 2000 and 2010, Indian retail attracted over $10 billion in foreign direct investment.
Answer: False
During the period of 2000 to 2010, Indian retail attracted approximately $1.8 billion in foreign direct investment, which was a small fraction of the total FDI inflow into India.
India's previous policy limited foreign single-brand retailers to 51% ownership, which was less restrictive than China's policy at the time.
Answer: False
The source indicates that India's prior policy restricted foreign single-brand retailers to 51% ownership, whereas China permitted 100% foreign ownership in both single-brand and multi-brand retail sectors. This makes India's policy comparatively more restrictive regarding ownership percentage.
What was the primary aim of the retail reforms announced by the Indian central government in November 2011?
Answer: To allow foreign direct investment in both multi-brand and single-brand stores.
The primary objective of the retail reforms announced in November 2011 was to permit foreign direct investment (FDI) in both multi-brand and single-brand retail sectors.
What action did the Indian government take in December 2011 regarding multi-brand retail reforms?
Answer: Placed the reforms on hold pending further consensus.
In December 2011, the Indian government decided to place the multi-brand retail reforms on hold, seeking further consensus on the policy.
What was the crucial condition imposed on foreign single-brand retailers in January 2012 reforms?
Answer: They must source at least 30% of goods from Indian SMEs.
A critical condition stipulated in the January 2012 reforms for 100% foreign ownership in single-brand stores was the requirement for retailers to source a minimum of 30% of their goods from Indian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
What was the total foreign direct investment (FDI) in Indian retail between 2000 and 2010?
Answer: Approximately $1.8 billion
Between 2000 and 2010, Indian retail attracted approximately $1.8 billion in foreign direct investment.
How did China's policy on foreign ownership in retail compare to India's previous policy (pre-2012)?
Answer: China allowed 100% ownership, while India limited it to 51%.
India's previous policy limited foreign single-brand retailers to 51% ownership, whereas China allowed 100% foreign ownership in both single-brand and multi-brand retail sectors.
Which of the following was suggested as a safeguard for FDI entry into India's multi-brand retail sector?
Answer: Ensuring no single retailer monopolizes procurement in an area.
A suggested safeguard for FDI entry into India's multi-brand retail sector was to ensure that no single retailer could monopolize the procurement of goods within a specific area.
Following the 2011 reforms, global retailers like Walmart and IKEA were expected to increase their presence in India.
Answer: True
The retail reforms enacted in 2011 signaled opportunities for global retailers such as Walmart and IKEA to expand their operations and presence within the Indian market.
IKEA planned to invest $1.9 billion and open 25 stores in India, but the local sourcing requirement was not a major concern for them.
Answer: False
IKEA planned a significant investment of $1.9 billion for 25 stores in India; however, the requirement for 30% local sourcing was identified as a major obstacle to their investment plans.
Which global retailers were expected to increase their presence in India following the 2011 reforms?
Answer: Walmart, Carrefour, and IKEA
Following the 2011 reforms, global retailers such as Walmart, Carrefour, and IKEA were anticipated to expand their operations and presence within India.
What was identified as a significant obstacle for IKEA's investment plans in India?
Answer: The requirement to source 30% of goods locally.
The stipulation requiring IKEA to source 30% of its goods locally was identified as a significant obstacle impacting its planned investment and expansion in India.
Inadequate integrated cold chain infrastructure is a major reason for India's high food spoilage rates.
Answer: True
A significant factor contributing to India's high rates of food spoilage is the deficiency in integrated cold chain infrastructure and related supply chain facilities.
Less than 1% of India's annual farm output is stored in cold chains, leading to significant losses for perishables.
Answer: True
The available cold storage infrastructure in India is insufficient, accommodating less than 1% of the annual farm output, which results in substantial losses for perishable goods.
Farmers in India typically receive about two-thirds of the final consumer price for their produce.
Answer: False
Contrary to the statement, the source indicates that Indian farmers typically receive approximately one-third of the final consumer price due to the extensive involvement of intermediaries. This contrasts with farmers in nations with greater organized retail penetration, who often receive up to two-thirds of the consumer price.
Middlemen and traditional retail chains in India capture over 60% of the final consumer price, impacting industry growth.
Answer: True
The margins captured by middlemen and traditional retail chains in India are substantial, often exceeding 60% of the final consumer price, which consequently hinders overall industry growth and farmer profitability.
Farmer associations like AIVGA supported retail reforms, believing middlemen currently offer fair prices to farmers.
Answer: False
Farmer associations, including AIVGA and Bharat Krishak Samaj, supported retail reforms precisely because they believed middlemen exploited farmers by offering unfair prices.
What is a primary reason cited for India's high food spoilage rates?
Answer: Inadequate integrated cold chain and infrastructure.
A primary reason cited for India's high food spoilage rates is the lack of adequate integrated cold chain infrastructure and supporting supply chain facilities.
What percentage of India's cold storage capacity is predominantly used for potatoes?
Answer: Approximately 80%
Approximately 80% of India's cold storage capacity is dedicated exclusively to the storage of potatoes.
What share of the final consumer price do Indian farmers typically receive due to the involvement of middlemen?
Answer: One-third
Due to the extensive network of middlemen, Indian farmers typically receive only about one-third of the final price paid by consumers for their produce.
What stance did farmer groups like Bharat Krishak Samaj take on retail reforms?
Answer: They supported reforms, advocating for direct sourcing from farmers.
Farmer groups, such as Bharat Krishak Samaj, supported retail reforms, advocating for direct sourcing from farmers to bypass exploitative middlemen.
Around 2010, the retail and logistics sector in India employed roughly 40 million people.
Answer: True
The retail and logistics sector in India was a significant employer, providing jobs for approximately 40 million individuals around the year 2010.
A McKinsey study found Indian retail labor productivity to be significantly higher than that of the United States in 2010.
Answer: False
A McKinsey study indicated that Indian retail labor productivity in 2010 was substantially lower than that of the United States, standing at approximately 6% of the US level.
If India's retail sector achieved productivity levels comparable to developed nations, over 50 million new jobs could potentially be created.
Answer: True
Enhancing India's retail sector productivity to levels comparable with developed economies could potentially lead to the creation of over 50 million new employment opportunities.
Critics of retail deregulation argued that foreign retailers would employ more people per unit of sales than local businesses.
Answer: False
Critics of retail deregulation argued that foreign retailers would employ fewer people per unit of sales compared to local businesses, potentially leading to job displacement.
Supporters countered job loss claims by citing Walmart's significant employment in the US and potential for job creation in India.
Answer: True
Proponents of retail reforms argued against job loss concerns by referencing Walmart's substantial employment figures in the US and projecting similar job creation potential within India.
A survey in early December 2011 showed that over 90% of consumers believed FDI in retail would lower prices and increase choice.
Answer: True
Consumer sentiment surveys conducted in early December 2011 revealed strong support for FDI in retail, with over 90% of consumers anticipating benefits such as lower prices and increased product variety.
How many people were employed in India's retail and logistics sector around 2010?
Answer: Approximately 40 million people
Around 2010, the retail and logistics sector in India provided employment for approximately 40 million individuals.
According to a McKinsey study, what was India's retail labor productivity compared to the United States in 2010?
Answer: 6% of the US level
A McKinsey study reported that in 2010, India's retail labor productivity was approximately 6% of that observed in the United States.
What potential benefit did supporters claim organized retail would bring regarding food prices?
Answer: It would help reduce high inflation rates and lower consumer prices.
Supporters argued that increased competition from organized retail would contribute to reducing high inflation rates and lowering consumer prices for food products.
What did economists and the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) anticipate as benefits of retail reform?
Answer: Reduced waste, improved hygiene, and increased consumer choice.
Economists and industry bodies like the CII anticipated that retail reforms would lead to reduced waste, improved hygiene standards, and a greater variety of choices for consumers.
What was the general sentiment among consumers surveyed in early December 2011 regarding FDI in retail?
Answer: Over 90% believed FDI would lower prices and increase choice.
Surveys conducted in early December 2011 indicated that over 90% of consumers held a positive view of FDI in retail, expecting it to result in lower prices and expanded consumer choice.
Which states initially expressed opposition to allowing foreign supermarkets?
Answer: West Bengal, Gujarat, and Bihar
States such as West Bengal, Gujarat, and Bihar were among those that initially expressed opposition to the allowance of foreign supermarkets.
What did supporters claim about the effect of competition from organized retailers on food inflation?
Answer: It would help reduce high inflation rates.
Supporters contended that increased competition stemming from organized retailers would positively impact food inflation by helping to reduce high rates.
What was the primary concern of opposition parties regarding the entry of foreign multi-brand retailers?
Answer: Potential decimation of local retailers and job losses.
Opposition parties primarily voiced concerns that the entry of foreign multi-brand retailers could lead to the decline of local businesses and significant job losses.