Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
The Second Battle of Mora took place on February 2, 1847.
Answer: False
The source indicates the Second Battle of Mora occurred on February 1, 1847, not February 2, 1847.
The Second Battle of Mora was fought in the vicinity of Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Answer: False
The Second Battle of Mora took place in and around the village of Mora, New Mexico, not in the vicinity of Santa Fe.
The United States forces were defeated in the Second Battle of Mora.
Answer: False
The United States forces achieved a victory in the Second Battle of Mora.
Both American and Mexican forces sustained significant casualties in the Second Battle of Mora.
Answer: False
While Mexican forces sustained casualties, the United States forces reported no casualties in the Second Battle of Mora.
The Second Battle of Mora took place before the First Battle of Mora.
Answer: False
The First Battle of Mora occurred on January 24, 1847, preceding the Second Battle of Mora on February 1, 1847.
When did the Second Battle of Mora take place?
Answer: February 1, 1847
The Second Battle of Mora occurred on February 1, 1847, as part of the Taos Revolt during the Mexican-American War.
What was the reported outcome for the United States forces in the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: A decisive victory for the United States
The United States forces achieved a decisive victory in the Second Battle of Mora.
How many American casualties were reported during the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: None
No American casualties were reported during the Second Battle of Mora.
The Second Battle of Mora was an isolated event unrelated to the Mexican-American War.
Answer: False
The Second Battle of Mora was an integral part of the Taos Revolt, which occurred during the broader Mexican-American War.
The Second Battle of Mora was the final military action of the entire Taos Revolt.
Answer: False
The Second Battle of Mora was a significant engagement, but the Taos Revolt concluded with the Battle of Cienega Creek on July 9, 1847.
The Second Battle of Mora was part of which specific revolt?
Answer: The Taos Revolt
The Second Battle of Mora was a key engagement within the Taos Revolt, a significant uprising against U.S. occupation in New Mexico.
What event immediately preceded the Second Battle of Mora and motivated Captain Morin's actions?
Answer: The defeat and death of Captain Israel R. Hendley at the First Battle of Mora
The preceding defeat and death of Captain Israel R. Hendley at the First Battle of Mora directly motivated Captain Morin's subsequent expedition to Mora.
Which battle is identified in the source as the final engagement of the Taos Revolt?
Answer: The Battle of Cienega Creek
The Battle of Cienega Creek, led by Captain Morin, is identified as the final engagement of the Taos Revolt.
Which cited work by David Sievert Lavender is mentioned in the article?
Answer: Bent's Fort
The cited work by David Sievert Lavender is 'Bent's Fort'.
What context does the campaignbox provide for the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: It fell under the New Mexico and Arizona Campaign.
The campaignbox places the Second Battle of Mora within the context of the New Mexico and Arizona Campaign during the Mexican-American War.
What did the source suggest about the conclusion of the Taos Revolt?
Answer: The revolt ended with the Battle of Cienega Creek, led by Captain Morin.
The source suggests that the Taos Revolt concluded with the Battle of Cienega Creek, led by Captain Morin.
Captain Israel R. Hendley commanded the US forces at the Second Battle of Mora.
Answer: False
Captain Israel R. Hendley was killed in the First Battle of Mora; Captain Jesse I. Morin commanded the US forces at the Second Battle of Mora.
US forces significantly outnumbered their Mexican counterparts at the Second Battle of Mora.
Answer: False
Both United States and Mexican forces were approximately equal in strength, with around 200 men each, at the Second Battle of Mora.
Captain Hendley's previous expedition was well-equipped with artillery, contributing to its success.
Answer: False
Captain Hendley's previous expedition to Mora was notably lacking in artillery support, which proved to be a disadvantage.
Captain Morin's forces lacked artillery support during the Second Battle of Mora.
Answer: False
Captain Morin's forces were equipped with howitzer cannons, providing crucial artillery support during the Second Battle of Mora.
The bodies of American casualties from the First Battle of Mora were buried on the battlefield.
Answer: False
The bodies of American casualties from the First Battle of Mora were returned to the garrison at Las Vegas and buried there.
Who commanded the United States forces during the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: Captain Jesse I. Morin
Captain Jesse I. Morin led the United States forces during the Second Battle of Mora.
What was the approximate strength of the Mexican forces, including militia and allies, at the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: Roughly 200 men
The Mexican forces, comprising militia and allies, numbered approximately 200 during the Second Battle of Mora.
What key piece of military equipment gave Captain Morin's forces an advantage over Captain Hendley's previous expedition?
Answer: Howitzer cannons
The deployment of howitzer cannons provided Captain Morin's forces with a significant tactical advantage over Captain Hendley's previous expedition, which lacked artillery.
How did the US troops initiate their attack during the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: By launching an artillery barrage on the fort
The United States troops commenced their attack by initiating an artillery barrage on the fort defending the town of Mora.
What happened to the bodies of the American casualties from the First Battle of Mora?
Answer: They were returned to the garrison at Las Vegas for burial.
The remains of American casualties from the First Battle of Mora were transported back to the Las Vegas garrison for burial.
What was the nature of the fighting described during the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: Short skirmishes in the streets with little effective defense from rebels
The fighting during the Second Battle of Mora was characterized by short skirmishes in the streets, with limited effective resistance from the rebels.
What was the nature of the US Army's previous expedition to Mora, led by Captain Hendley?
Answer: It marched without artillery against superior enemy numbers.
Captain Hendley's previous expedition to Mora marched without artillery and faced superior enemy numbers, leading to its defeat.
Noncombatants remained in Mora and actively participated in the fighting alongside the insurgents.
Answer: False
Upon hearing the artillery barrage, many noncombatants fled Mora, seeking refuge in the surrounding mountains, rather than participating in the fighting.
The town of Mora remained largely undamaged after the Second Battle of Mora.
Answer: False
The town of Mora was left in ruins as a result of the fighting and the use of American artillery during the Second Battle of Mora.
A US government proclamation stated that only the Upper Mora settlement was burned.
Answer: False
A US government proclamation from February 15, 1847, stated that both the Upper and Lower Mora settlements were burned to the ground by the US Army.
Captain Morin ordered his troops to spare nearby ranches and crops after the battle.
Answer: False
Captain Morin ordered the destruction of settlements, ranches, and crops belonging to the fleeing inhabitants following the Second Battle of Mora.
Following the US Army's departure, the settlements of Mora were permanently abandoned.
Answer: False
After the US Army departed, the New Mexican civilians eventually returned to Mora and commenced the process of rebuilding their settlements.
What was the condition of the town of Mora following the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: It was left in ruins due to the fighting and artillery use.
Following the Second Battle of Mora, the town was left in ruins as a consequence of the combat and the use of artillery.
What action did Captain Morin order regarding the settlements of Mora and surrounding areas after the battle?
Answer: To pursue fleeing inhabitants and destroy settlements, ranches, and crops
Captain Morin ordered his troops to pursue fleeing inhabitants and to destroy the settlements of Upper and Lower Mora, along with nearby ranches and crops.
What did the US government proclamation of February 15, 1847, state regarding the Mora settlements?
Answer: That the US Army had burned the Upper and Lower Mora settlements to the ground.
A US government proclamation issued on February 15, 1847, declared that the US Army had burned both the Upper and Lower Mora settlements.
How did noncombatants react to the US artillery barrage during the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: They fled Mora seeking refuge in the surrounding mountains.
Upon hearing the US artillery barrage, noncombatants in Mora fled the town and sought refuge in the surrounding mountainous terrain.
What happened to the crops and livestock of the fleeing inhabitants after the Second Battle of Mora?
Answer: They were destroyed by Captain Morin's men.
Captain Morin's men destroyed the crops and livestock belonging to the inhabitants who had fled Mora.
What did Captain Morin order regarding the settlements of Upper and Lower Mora after the battle?
Answer: They were to be completely destroyed, along with nearby ranches and crops.
Following the battle, Captain Morin ordered the complete destruction of the Upper and Lower Mora settlements, as well as nearby ranches and crops.
Seventeen Mexican insurgents were captured during the Second Battle of Mora.
Answer: True
Seventeen Mexican insurgents were indeed captured following the Second Battle of Mora.
Captured insurgents were tried for desertion under Mexican military law.
Answer: False
Captured insurgents were tried for treason under the Kearny Code, the legal framework established by the United States for occupied New Mexico.
Captured insurgents were tried under Spanish colonial law.
Answer: False
Captured insurgents were tried under the Kearny Code, the legal framework governing the US provisional government in New Mexico, not Spanish colonial law.
Lewis Hector Garrard praised the American trials as a model of justice and fairness.
Answer: False
Lewis Hector Garrard, an eyewitness, found the trials unjust and expressed moral distress, viewing them as a perversion of justice.
Under which legal framework were the captured insurgents tried for treason?
Answer: The Kearny Code
The captured insurgents were tried for treason under the Kearny Code, which governed the US provisional government in New Mexico.
What was Lewis Hector Garrard's perspective on the trials of the insurgents?
Answer: He believed the trials were unjust and felt sickened by them.
Lewis Hector Garrard, an eyewitness, felt the trials were unjust and deeply disturbing to him.
What happened to the original Taos Revolt insurrectionists, including Pablo Montoya, shortly after the revolt?
Answer: They were tried and executed in Taos.
The principal insurrectionists of the Taos Revolt, including leader Pablo Montoya, were tried and subsequently executed in Taos shortly after the revolt.
Who served on the courts and juries that tried the captured insurgents?
Answer: Individuals associated with the American victims.
The courts and juries responsible for trying the captured insurgents were composed of individuals connected to the American victims.
What is the historical significance of the executions that took place in the Taos Valley following the revolt?
Answer: They were the first known executions by hanging in the region.
The executions conducted in the Taos Valley following the revolt are historically significant as the first known instances of capital punishment by hanging in the region.
Captain Hendley's expedition was prompted by peaceful diplomatic overtures from the New Mexican populace.
Answer: False
Captain Hendley's expedition was a response to the assassinations of American government employees and traders in the region, not peaceful overtures.
Captain Morin justified his "scorched earth" actions as a necessary measure to establish new trade routes.
Answer: False
Captain Morin justified his 'scorched earth' tactics primarily as revenge for the death of Captain Hendley at the First Battle of Mora, viewing them as a necessary response to insurgent aggression.
Americans generally acknowledged that their military advance onto homesteads was a provocation for the conflict.
Answer: False
Many Americans held the view that the militia acted without provocation, interpreting the killings of civilian traders as outright murder, despite US military advances onto homesteads.
Besides revenge for Captain Hendley's death, what other factor prompted Captain Morin's expedition to Mora?
Answer: To respond to assassinations of American government employees and traders
Captain Morin's expedition was also prompted by a series of assassinations targeting American government employees and traders in the region.
According to Lewis Hector Garrard, what was a major hypocrisy of the American actions in New Mexico?
Answer: Americans conquered the territory and then prosecuted its inhabitants for treason.
Garrard criticized the American actions as hypocritical, noting the conquest of the territory followed by the prosecution of its inhabitants for treason.
What was the primary motivation behind Captain Hendley's expedition to Mora?
Answer: To respond to the assassinations of American government employees and traders.
Captain Hendley's expedition to Mora was primarily motivated by the need to address the assassinations of American government employees and traders.