Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
The Siege of Kőszeg, also known as the German campaign, occurred in 1532.
Answer: True
The Siege of Kőszeg, also referred to as the Siege of Güns or the German campaign, took place in 1532, involving the Ottoman army besieging the fort.
The defending garrison at Kőszeg was well-equipped with cannons and firearms.
Answer: False
The defending garrison at Kőszeg was notably ill-equipped, possessing no cannons and very few firearms, relying instead on their determination and the fort's defenses.
The defenders of Kőszeg used counter-mining to thwart Ottoman attempts to breach the walls.
Answer: True
The defenders of Kőszeg employed counter-mining tactics, digging tunnels to intercept and neutralize Ottoman mining operations aimed at breaching the city walls.
The siege of Kőszeg lasted only ten days.
Answer: False
The Siege of Kőszeg lasted for more than twenty-five days, significantly longer than ten days.
Ottoman artillery successfully breached the walls of Kőszeg, leading to an immediate surrender.
Answer: False
While Ottoman artillery damaged parts of the walls, it did not lead to an immediate surrender, as the defenders continued to resist fiercely.
The infobox 'Result' section indicates that the Kőszeg garrison failed to stop the Ottoman advance.
Answer: False
The infobox 'Result' section indicates that the Kőszeg garrison successfully prevented the Ottoman advance towards Vienna.
Approximately how many soldiers comprised the defending garrison at Kőszeg?
Answer: Approximately 700 to 800
The defending garrison at Kőszeg consisted of approximately 700 to 800 Croatian soldiers.
How long did the Siege of Kőszeg last?
Answer: More than 25 days
The Siege of Kőszeg lasted for more than twenty-five days.
What tactic did the defenders of Kőszeg employ against Ottoman mining attempts?
Answer: Using counter-mining tunnels
The defenders of Kőszeg employed counter-mining tactics, digging tunnels to intercept and neutralize Ottoman mining operations aimed at breaching the city walls.
What was the approximate duration of the Ottoman delay at Kőszeg?
Answer: Nearly four weeks
The Ottoman army was delayed at Kőszeg for nearly four weeks due to the determined defense.
Which of the following best describes the conclusion of the siege according to one version of the accounts?
Answer: The city agreed to a nominal surrender, allowing a token Ottoman force to raise their flag.
One version of the accounts suggests that the city agreed to a nominal surrender, permitting a token Ottoman force to raise their flag, rather than a full surrender or complete expulsion.
What does the aerial view of Jurisics Castle in Kőszeg primarily show?
Answer: The historical fort that was the site of the 1532 siege.
The aerial view of Jurisics Castle in Kőszeg primarily shows the historical fort itself, which was the site of the 1532 siege.
Nikola Jurišić, the commander of the Kőszeg defenders, was of Ottoman origin.
Answer: False
Nikola Jurišić, the commander of the Kőszeg defenders, was of Croatian origin, not Ottoman.
The Ottoman army numbered approximately 10,000 soldiers during the 1532 campaign.
Answer: False
The Ottoman army numbered over 100,000 soldiers during the 1532 campaign, significantly exceeding 10,000 troops.
Ferdinand I became involved in Hungary's succession because he was a direct heir to the Hungarian throne.
Answer: False
Ferdinand I became involved in Hungary's succession not as a direct heir, but through his marriage to King Louis II's sister and his subsequent election as King by Hungarian nobles.
Ferdinand I was confident in his assembled Christian forces to meet Suleiman's army in 1532.
Answer: False
Ferdinand I was not confident; he feared that his Christian forces would not be assembled in time to counter Suleiman's massive army, having withdrawn his main army and leaving Kőszeg with a small garrison.
Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha expected fierce resistance at Kőszeg due to its strong fortifications.
Answer: False
Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha did not expect fierce resistance, as he was unaware of the fort's limited defenses and likely anticipated a swift Ottoman victory.
Statues of Nikola Jurišić can be found in both Senj, Croatia, and Kőszeg, Hungary.
Answer: True
Statues honoring Nikola Jurišić, the defender of Kőszeg, are indeed located in both Senj, Croatia, and Kőszeg, Hungary.
Who was the Croatian captain leading the defense of Kőszeg against the Ottoman forces?
Answer: Nikola Jurišić
The defense of Kőszeg was led by Nikola Jurišić, a Croatian captain.
What was the estimated strength of the Ottoman army besieging Kőszeg in 1532?
Answer: Over 100,000 troops
The Ottoman army besieging Kőszeg in 1532 was estimated to be over 100,000 soldiers strong.
Why did Ferdinand I become involved in the succession dispute over Hungary?
Answer: He married King Louis II's sister and was elected King.
Ferdinand I became involved in Hungary's succession through his marriage to King Louis II's sister and his subsequent election as King by Hungarian nobles.
Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent led the Ottoman army during the 1532 campaign with the goal of capturing Vienna.
Answer: True
Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent led the extensive Ottoman army in 1532 with the primary objective of capturing Vienna, the Habsburg capital.
The Siege of Kőszeg took place long after the Ottoman defeat at the 1529 Siege of Vienna.
Answer: False
The Siege of Kőszeg in 1532 occurred only three years after the Ottoman defeat at the 1529 Siege of Vienna, placing it within a continuous period of Ottoman-Habsburg conflict.
The Battle of Mohács in 1526 led to the death of King Louis II and the end of independent Hungary, setting the stage for the Kőszeg conflict.
Answer: True
The decisive Ottoman victory at the Battle of Mohács in 1526 resulted in the death of King Louis II and the collapse of independent Hungarian rule, creating the conditions for subsequent Ottoman-Habsburg conflicts, including the events leading to the Siege of Kőszeg.
The 1529 Siege of Vienna was the second major attempt by Suleiman to capture the Habsburg capital.
Answer: False
The 1529 Siege of Vienna was the first major attempt by Suleiman the Magnificent to capture the Habsburg capital; his 1532 campaign was a subsequent effort.
The 'Little War in Hungary' began with Ferdinand I's capture of Esztergom in 1530.
Answer: True
The period of conflict known as the 'Little War in Hungary' is often considered to have begun with Ferdinand I's counter-attack in 1530, which included the capture of strategic forts like Esztergom.
Suleiman the Magnificent's 1532 campaign aimed to conquer territories in North Africa.
Answer: False
Suleiman the Magnificent's 1532 campaign was directed towards Habsburg territories in Central Europe, specifically aiming for Vienna, not North Africa.
In 1532, the Ottoman army followed its usual route directly towards Vienna after crossing the Drava River.
Answer: False
In 1532, the Ottoman army deviated from its usual route, turning west into Ferdinand's territory instead of proceeding directly towards Vienna after crossing the Drava River.
What was the primary objective of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent during his 1532 campaign?
Answer: To capture the Habsburg capital, Vienna.
Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent's primary objective during his 1532 campaign was to advance into Habsburg territory and capture Vienna.
Which battle preceding the Siege of Kőszeg resulted in the death of King Louis II and the end of independent Hungary?
Answer: The Battle of Mohács
The Battle of Mohács in 1526 led to the death of King Louis II and marked the end of independent Hungary, setting the stage for subsequent Ottoman-Habsburg conflicts.
What was the 'Little War in Hungary'?
Answer: The period of conflicts between Habsburgs and Ottomans following the 1529 Siege of Vienna.
The 'Little War in Hungary' refers to the series of conflicts between the Habsburgs and the Ottoman Empire that occurred after the 1529 Siege of Vienna.
How did the Ottoman army's route in 1532 differ from previous campaigns towards Vienna?
Answer: They turned west into Ferdinand's territory instead of taking the direct route.
In 1532, the Ottoman army deviated from its usual route, turning west into Ferdinand's Hungarian territory instead of proceeding directly towards Vienna after crossing the Drava River.
What event is considered the start of the 'Little War in Hungary'?
Answer: Ferdinand I's counter-attack and capture of Esztergom in 1530
The 'Little War in Hungary' is often considered to have begun with Ferdinand I's counter-attack in 1530, which included the capture of strategic forts like Esztergom.
What was the primary reason Ferdinand feared the Ottoman advance in 1532?
Answer: He lacked sufficient troops to defend Vienna.
Ferdinand feared the Ottoman advance in 1532 primarily because he lacked sufficient troops to effectively defend Vienna against Suleiman's massive army.
The defenders of Kőszeg successfully repelled the Ottoman army, preventing their advance towards Vienna.
Answer: True
The determined defense of Kőszeg is credited with halting the Ottoman advance towards Vienna, effectively preventing the siege of the Habsburg capital at that time.
The Ottoman withdrawal from Kőszeg was primarily due to a lack of interest in conquering Hungary.
Answer: False
The Ottoman withdrawal was influenced by factors such as the significant delay caused by the siege, the onset of adverse weather conditions, and the assembly of a large Imperial army, rather than a lack of interest in Hungary.
Kőszeg was a major fortress controlling a vital pass into Austria.
Answer: False
While Kőszeg was strategically located near the Austrian border, it was considered a small border fort, not a major fortress controlling a vital pass into Austria.
After Suleiman's withdrawal in 1532, the Habsburgs lost all territory previously held in Hungary.
Answer: False
Following Suleiman's withdrawal, Ferdinand I was able to reoccupy some territories, and the Habsburgs did not lose all territory previously held in Hungary.
The 1533 Treaty of Constantinople recognized Suleiman the Magnificent as the sole ruler of Hungary.
Answer: False
The 1533 Treaty of Constantinople confirmed John Zápolya's right to rule as king of all Hungary but also recognized Ferdinand's possession of certain territories, thus not making Suleiman the sole ruler.
The 1533 treaty successfully resolved the territorial dispute between Ferdinand I and John Zápolya.
Answer: False
The 1533 Treaty of Constantinople did not successfully resolve the territorial dispute; skirmishes continued, and the conflict over Hungary persisted.
The defense of Kőszeg is credited with saving Vienna by delaying the Ottoman army in 1532.
Answer: True
The defense of Kőszeg is historically significant because it is credited with saving Vienna by delaying the Ottoman advance, allowing time for a strong Imperial army to assemble.
Which of the following was NOT a factor contributing to the Ottoman withdrawal from Kőszeg?
Answer: A decisive defeat inflicted by Nikola Jurišić's forces.
While the siege caused delay, weather issues, and an Imperial army assembly contributed to the withdrawal, historical accounts do not describe a decisive defeat inflicted solely by Jurišić's forces as the primary reason for the Ottoman withdrawal.
What is the historical significance attributed to the defense of Kőszeg in 1532?
Answer: It is credited with saving Vienna by delaying the Ottoman advance.
The defense of Kőszeg is historically significant because it is credited with saving Vienna by delaying the Ottoman advance, allowing time for a strong Imperial army to assemble.
Which treaty concluded in 1533 between Suleiman and Ferdinand addressed the status of Hungary?
Answer: The Treaty of Constantinople
The Treaty of Constantinople, concluded in 1533 between Suleiman the Magnificent and Ferdinand I, addressed the ongoing disputes over Hungary.
Did the 1533 Treaty of Constantinople bring lasting peace to the region?
Answer: No, skirmishes continued, and the dispute persisted.
No, the 1533 Treaty of Constantinople did not bring lasting peace; skirmishes continued between the Habsburgs and Ottomans, and the dispute over Hungary persisted.
Which of the following best describes the strategic importance of Kőszeg's location?
Answer: It was near the Austrian border, controlling access into Habsburg territory.
Kőszeg's strategic importance lay in its location near the Austrian border, controlling access into Habsburg territory from Hungary, although it was considered a minor fort.
What was the outcome of the 1533 Treaty of Constantinople regarding the status of Ferdinand and the Grand Vizier?
Answer: It stipulated that Ferdinand was considered equal in status to the Ottoman Grand Vizier.
The 1533 Treaty of Constantinople stipulated that Ferdinand was considered equal in status to the Ottoman Grand Vizier, reflecting a diplomatic parity.
Which of the following statements accurately reflects the outcome of the 1533 Treaty of Constantinople regarding Hungary?
Answer: It confirmed John Zápolya's right to rule Hungary but acknowledged Ferdinand's possession of some territories.
The 1533 Treaty of Constantinople confirmed John Zápolya's right to rule Hungary while acknowledging Ferdinand's possession of certain territories he had reoccupied.
All historical accounts agree that Nikola Jurišić decisively defeated the Ottoman army and forced their retreat.
Answer: False
Historical accounts differ on the precise conclusion of the siege. While the defense was heroic and delayed the Ottomans, there is no universal agreement that Jurišić decisively defeated the entire army or forced a complete retreat solely through military action.
Suleiman's 1532 campaign was known as the 'Ottoman campaign' in Turkish sources.
Answer: False
Suleiman's 1532 campaign into Habsburg territory was referred to as the 'German campaign' (Alman Seferi) in Ottoman Turkish sources.
Historian Paolo Giovio believed the siege failed because the Ottomans brought excessively large siege guns.
Answer: False
Historian Paolo Giovio suggested the siege failed because the Ottomans lacked sufficiently large siege guns, expecting a field battle rather than a prolonged siege.
Kőszeg was known as Güns during the period it was under Habsburg jurisdiction.
Answer: True
The city is known as Kőszeg in Hungarian and Güns in German. During the period of the Ottoman-Habsburg wars, it was under Habsburg jurisdiction and referred to as Güns.
What did historian Paolo Giovio suggest was the reason for the failure of the siege at Güns (Kőszeg)?
Answer: The Ottomans lacked large siege guns and expected a field battle.
Historian Paolo Giovio suggested the siege of Güns failed because the Ottomans had not brought large siege guns, apparently expecting a field battle rather than a prolonged siege.
What was the dual name of the city during the Ottoman-Habsburg conflicts?
Answer: Kőszeg / Güns
The city is known as Kőszeg in Hungarian and Güns in German, a dual naming relevant during the Ottoman-Habsburg conflicts.
What was the 'German campaign' referred to in Ottoman Turkish sources regarding the 1532 events?
Answer: Suleiman the Magnificent's 1532 expedition into Habsburg territory.
The 'German campaign' (Alman Seferi) in Ottoman Turkish sources refers to Suleiman the Magnificent's 1532 military expedition into Habsburg territory, which included the Siege of Kőszeg.
The Siege of Kőszeg is also referred to by which other name in the source?
Answer: The Siege of Güns
The Siege of Kőszeg is also referred to as the Siege of Güns in the provided source material.