Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


Foundations and Dimensions of Sustainability

At a Glance

Title: Foundations and Dimensions of Sustainability

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Conceptual Foundations and Historical Evolution: 12 flashcards, 18 questions
  • Dimensions and Interrelations of Sustainability: 12 flashcards, 23 questions
  • Challenges, Criticisms, and Barriers to Sustainability: 12 flashcards, 17 questions
  • Pathways and Strategies for Sustainability Transformation: 15 flashcards, 18 questions
  • Measurement, Governance, and Economic Models: 9 flashcards, 13 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 60
  • True/False Questions: 47
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 42
  • Total Questions: 89

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Foundations and Dimensions of Sustainability

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Sustainability" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Foundations and Dimensions of Sustainability

Study Guide: Foundations and Dimensions of Sustainability

Conceptual Foundations and Historical Evolution

The Latin root 'sustinere' implies that sustainability is fundamentally about the ability to persist and endure over an extended period.

Answer: True

The Latin root 'sustinere' directly translates to 'to hold up, support, uphold, or endure,' which forms the basis of sustainability's meaning as the ability to continue over time.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of sustainability, considering its Latin origin?: Sustainability is derived from the Latin word 'sustinere,' meaning to hold up, support, uphold, or endure. Therefore, its fundamental definition is the ability to continue over a long period of time, implying persistence and resilience.

UNESCO defines 'sustainability' as the processes and pathways to achieve a goal, while 'sustainable development' is the long-term goal itself.

Answer: False

UNESCO defines 'sustainability' as the long-term goal and 'sustainable development' as the processes and pathways to achieve that goal, which is the inverse of the statement.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the distinction between 'sustainability' and 'sustainable development' as defined by UNESCO?: UNESCO distinguishes between the two by stating that 'sustainability' is often considered a long-term goal, such as achieving a more sustainable world, while 'sustainable development' refers to the various processes and pathways employed to reach that goal.

Sustainability is a 'normative concept,' meaning its pursuit involves aligning scientific knowledge with societal values and aspirations for the future.

Answer: True

As a 'normative concept,' sustainability is based on what is valued and desirable, requiring the integration of scientific knowledge with societal aspirations for the future.

Related Concepts:

  • What does it mean for sustainability to be considered a 'normative concept'?: Sustainability is regarded as a 'normative concept,' meaning it is based on what people value or find desirable. The pursuit of sustainability involves connecting scientific knowledge with applications that align with people's aspirations for the future.

The Brundtland Commission's 1987 report defined sustainable development as meeting future generations' needs without compromising the present generation's ability to meet their own.

Answer: False

The Brundtland Commission's 1987 report defined sustainable development as meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Brundtland Commission influence the modern understanding of sustainability and sustainable development?: The 1983 UN Brundtland Commission significantly influenced the modern use of the term 'sustainability' by providing a widely adopted definition of sustainable development in its 1987 report, 'Our Common Future.' This report defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their own needs, popularizing the concept in policy discussions.

The Oxford Dictionary of English defines sustainability as the property of being environmentally sustainable, specifically avoiding the long-term depletion of natural resources.

Answer: True

The Oxford Dictionary of English defines sustainability as the property of being environmentally sustainable, specifically focusing on avoiding the long-term depletion of natural resources.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the Oxford Dictionary of English, what is the specific definition of sustainability?: The Oxford Dictionary of English defines sustainability as 'the property of being environmentally sustainable; the degree to which a process or enterprise is able to be maintained or continued while avoiding the long-term depletion of natural resources'.

Hans Carl von Carlowitz introduced 'Nachhaltigkeit' in the 18th century, applying it to agriculture to ensure continuous crop yields.

Answer: False

Hans Carl von Carlowitz introduced 'Nachhaltigkeit' in the 18th century, applying it to forestry to ensure the long-term responsible use of timber, not agriculture.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is credited with introducing the concept of 'Nachhaltigkeit' (sustainability) in the context of forestry, and what did it mean?: Hans Carl von Carlowitz (1645–1714) is credited with introducing the concept of 'Nachhaltigkeit' in German, which applied to forestry. In his 1713 work 'Silvicultura oeconomica,' he defined it as the long-term responsible use of a natural resource, specifically timber, ensuring continuous and ongoing use through conservation and replanting.

Historically, the concept of sustainability broadened from forestry to a general preservation of environmental resources for future generations, influenced by a 1972 book by Ernst Basler.

Answer: True

The concept of sustainability historically broadened from its origins in forestry to a more general preservation of environmental resources for future generations, a shift influenced by Ernst Basler's 1972 book.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the historical usage of 'sustainability' evolve from forestry to broader environmental concerns?: Historically, sustainability referred to environmental sustainability, specifically the long-term use of natural resources like forests. The shift to a broader preservation of environmental resources to sustain the world for future generations can be traced to a 1972 book by Ernst Basler.

The Brundtland Report viewed sustainable development as a global concept linking environmental and social issues, emphasizing its importance for both developing and industrialized nations.

Answer: True

The Brundtland Report indeed described the environment and development as inseparable, viewing sustainable development as a global concept linking environmental and social issues relevant to both developing and industrialized nations.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Brundtland Report describe the relationship between the environment and development in the context of sustainability?: The Brundtland Report described the environment and development as inseparable in the search for sustainability, viewing sustainable development as a global concept that links environmental and social issues. It emphasized its importance for both developing and industrialized countries.

Paul Crutzen proposed the concept of the Anthropocene to describe a geological epoch where human activities significantly impact Earth's systems.

Answer: True

Paul Crutzen is credited with proposing the concept of the Anthropocene, recognizing the profound and lasting impact of human activities on Earth's geology and ecosystems.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Anthropocene, and who proposed this concept?: The Anthropocene is a proposed geological epoch that acknowledges the significant impact human activities now have on Earth's geology and ecosystems. This concept was proposed by Paul Crutzen.

The vagueness of the term 'sustainability' is universally seen as a negative aspect, hindering its practical application.

Answer: False

While often criticized for its vagueness, the 'fuzziness' of sustainability can also be viewed positively, fostering flexibility and enabling a wider array of diverse approaches to achieve its fundamental goals.

Related Concepts:

  • How can the vagueness of the term 'sustainability' be seen as a positive aspect?: While sustainability is often criticized for its vagueness, some argue that this 'fuzziness' can actually be liberating. It means that the basic goal of sustainability—maintaining or improving desirable conditions—can be pursued with more flexibility, allowing for diverse approaches and interpretations.

What is the fundamental meaning of sustainability, derived from its Latin origin 'sustinere'?

Answer: The ability to continue over a long period of time, implying persistence and resilience.

Derived from the Latin 'sustinere,' the fundamental meaning of sustainability is the capacity to persist and endure over an extended duration.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of sustainability, considering its Latin origin?: Sustainability is derived from the Latin word 'sustinere,' meaning to hold up, support, uphold, or endure. Therefore, its fundamental definition is the ability to continue over a long period of time, implying persistence and resilience.

According to UNESCO, what is the distinction between 'sustainability' and 'sustainable development'?

Answer: Sustainability is the long-term goal, and sustainable development refers to the processes to reach that goal.

UNESCO differentiates 'sustainability' as the overarching long-term goal and 'sustainable development' as the operational processes and pathways undertaken to achieve that goal.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the distinction between 'sustainability' and 'sustainable development' as defined by UNESCO?: UNESCO distinguishes between the two by stating that 'sustainability' is often considered a long-term goal, such as achieving a more sustainable world, while 'sustainable development' refers to the various processes and pathways employed to reach that goal.

What does it mean for sustainability to be considered a 'normative concept'?

Answer: It is based on what people value or find desirable, connecting science with aspirations.

To be a 'normative concept' means that sustainability is rooted in societal values and aspirations, requiring the integration of scientific knowledge with what is considered desirable for the future.

Related Concepts:

  • What does it mean for sustainability to be considered a 'normative concept'?: Sustainability is regarded as a 'normative concept,' meaning it is based on what people value or find desirable. The pursuit of sustainability involves connecting scientific knowledge with applications that align with people's aspirations for the future.

The 1983 UN Brundtland Commission significantly influenced the modern understanding of sustainability by:

Answer: Providing a widely adopted definition of sustainable development in its 1987 report.

The 1983 UN Brundtland Commission profoundly shaped the modern understanding of sustainability by delivering a widely adopted definition of sustainable development in its influential 1987 report, 'Our Common Future'.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Brundtland Commission influence the modern understanding of sustainability and sustainable development?: The 1983 UN Brundtland Commission significantly influenced the modern use of the term 'sustainability' by providing a widely adopted definition of sustainable development in its 1987 report, 'Our Common Future.' This report defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their own needs, popularizing the concept in policy discussions.
  • How did the Brundtland Report describe the relationship between the environment and development in the context of sustainability?: The Brundtland Report described the environment and development as inseparable in the search for sustainability, viewing sustainable development as a global concept that links environmental and social issues. It emphasized its importance for both developing and industrialized countries.

Who is credited with introducing the concept of 'Nachhaltigkeit' (sustainability) in the context of forestry?

Answer: Hans Carl von Carlowitz

Hans Carl von Carlowitz is recognized for introducing the concept of 'Nachhaltigkeit' (sustainability) in the 18th century, specifically within the domain of forestry management.

Related Concepts:

  • Who is credited with introducing the concept of 'Nachhaltigkeit' (sustainability) in the context of forestry, and what did it mean?: Hans Carl von Carlowitz (1645–1714) is credited with introducing the concept of 'Nachhaltigkeit' in German, which applied to forestry. In his 1713 work 'Silvicultura oeconomica,' he defined it as the long-term responsible use of a natural resource, specifically timber, ensuring continuous and ongoing use through conservation and replanting.

How did the Brundtland Report describe the relationship between the environment and development in the context of sustainability?

Answer: As inseparable, linking environmental and social issues globally.

The Brundtland Report articulated the relationship between environment and development as inseparable, framing sustainable development as a global concept that integrates environmental and social concerns.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Brundtland Report describe the relationship between the environment and development in the context of sustainability?: The Brundtland Report described the environment and development as inseparable in the search for sustainability, viewing sustainable development as a global concept that links environmental and social issues. It emphasized its importance for both developing and industrialized countries.

Who proposed the concept of the Anthropocene, a geological epoch acknowledging human impact on Earth's systems?

Answer: Paul Crutzen

Paul Crutzen is credited with proposing the concept of the Anthropocene, recognizing the profound and lasting impact of human activities on Earth's geology and ecosystems.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Anthropocene, and who proposed this concept?: The Anthropocene is a proposed geological epoch that acknowledges the significant impact human activities now have on Earth's geology and ecosystems. This concept was proposed by Paul Crutzen.

How can the vagueness of the term 'sustainability' be seen as a positive aspect?

Answer: It allows for more flexibility and diverse approaches to achieving its basic goal.

The inherent 'fuzziness' or vagueness of sustainability can be advantageous, fostering flexibility and enabling a wider array of diverse approaches to achieve its fundamental objective of maintaining or improving desirable conditions.

Related Concepts:

  • How can the vagueness of the term 'sustainability' be seen as a positive aspect?: While sustainability is often criticized for its vagueness, some argue that this 'fuzziness' can actually be liberating. It means that the basic goal of sustainability—maintaining or improving desirable conditions—can be pursued with more flexibility, allowing for diverse approaches and interpretations.

Dimensions and Interrelations of Sustainability

Modern definitions of sustainability primarily emphasize the economic dimension, with environmental concerns being secondary.

Answer: False

Modern usage of sustainability, particularly in discussions of climate change and biodiversity loss, often emphasizes the environmental dimension, not primarily the economic.

Related Concepts:

  • How is sustainability generally understood in modern usage, and what dimension is often emphasized?: In modern usage, sustainability generally refers to a state where the environment, economy, and society can continue to exist over a long period. Many definitions, including those addressing climate change and biodiversity loss, emphasize the environmental dimension.

The economic dimension of sustainability is controversial due to the inherent tension between universal welfare and environmental conservation.

Answer: True

The economic dimension is controversial due to the tension between achieving 'welfare and prosperity for all' and the imperative of environmental conservation, often requiring difficult trade-offs.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary controversy surrounding the economic dimension of sustainability?: The economic dimension of sustainability is controversial because there is tension between the ideas of 'welfare and prosperity for all' and environmental conservation, often necessitating trade-offs. Scholars discuss this under the concepts of 'weak and strong sustainability'.

Sustainable development has a single goal: to meet human development goals.

Answer: False

Sustainable development has two linked goals: meeting human development goals and enabling natural systems to provide necessary resources and services, not a single goal.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the two linked goals of sustainable development?: Sustainable development has two linked goals: first, to meet human development goals, and second, to enable natural systems to continue providing the natural resources and ecosystem services necessary for economies and society. This focuses on economic development, social development, and environmental protection for future generations.

Scholars commonly distinguish two dimensions of sustainability: environmental and economic.

Answer: False

Scholars commonly distinguish three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic, not just two.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the three commonly distinguished dimensions of sustainability, and what are they often called?: Scholars usually distinguish three different dimensions of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic. These are often referred to as three pillars, dimensions, components, aspects, perspectives, factors, or goals.

The popular Venn diagram representing the three intersecting circles of sustainability first appeared in a 1997 article by Edward Barbier.

Answer: False

The popular Venn diagram of sustainability's three intersecting circles first appeared in a 1987 article by Edward Barbier, not 1997.

Related Concepts:

  • When and by whom did the popular Venn diagram representing the three intersecting circles of sustainability first appear?: The popular representation of sustainability as three intersecting circles, or a Venn diagram, first appeared in a 1987 article by the economist Edward Barbier.

Many experts consider the environmental dimension of sustainability to be the most important because it sets limits for economic and social development.

Answer: True

Many experts indeed consider the environmental dimension, or planetary integrity, to be paramount because it establishes the fundamental limits for both economic and social development.

Related Concepts:

  • In the hierarchy of sustainability dimensions, which one is often considered the most important by many experts, and why?: Many experts consider the environmental dimension, also termed planetary integrity or ecological integrity, to be the most important. This is because it sets limits to economic and social development, implying that without a healthy environment, other forms of sustainability cannot be achieved.

The 'SDG wedding cake model' illustrates that the economy is the foundational basis for society and the environment.

Answer: False

The 'SDG wedding cake model' illustrates a hierarchy where the environmental dimension is foundational, containing society, which in turn contains the economy, thereby emphasizing environmental limits.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'nested ellipses' diagram and the 'SDG wedding cake model' used to illustrate regarding sustainability dimensions?: Both the 'nested ellipses' diagram and the 'SDG wedding cake model' illustrate a hierarchy among the three dimensions of sustainability. They show that the environmental dimension (biosphere system) is the foundational basis, containing society, which in turn contains the economy, thereby emphasizing environmental limits.

The Brundtland report asserts that poverty is solely a consequence of environmental problems, not a cause.

Answer: False

The Brundtland report explicitly states that poverty both causes environmental problems and results from them, highlighting a reciprocal relationship.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the Brundtland report connect poverty with environmental problems?: The Brundtland report states that poverty both causes environmental problems and results from them. Therefore, effectively addressing environmental problems necessitates understanding and tackling the underlying factors of world poverty and inequality.

A socially sustainable society is one where people do not face structural obstacles in areas like health, influence, and impartiality.

Answer: True

A socially sustainable society is defined as one where individuals are not subjected to structural impediments in fundamental areas such as health, influence, competence, impartiality, and meaning-making.

Related Concepts:

  • What is one definition of a socially sustainable society?: One definition states that a society is socially sustainable if its people do not face structural obstacles in key areas such as health, influence, competence, impartiality, and meaning-making. This implies a society where individuals have equitable access to fundamental well-being and participation.

Some scholars argue that all domains of sustainability, including ecological and economic, are fundamentally social, placing social issues at the core.

Answer: True

Some scholars indeed contend that all domains of sustainability, including ecological and economic, are fundamentally social, thereby positioning social issues at the very core of sustainability discourse.

Related Concepts:

  • Why do some scholars place social issues at the very center of sustainability discussions?: Some scholars place social issues at the very center of sustainability discussions, suggesting that all domains of sustainability—ecological, economic, political, and cultural—are fundamentally social. From this perspective, social sustainability encompasses all human activities and their relationship with the natural world.

Gender equity is irrelevant to social sustainability, as climate change impacts all groups equally.

Answer: False

Gender equity is a crucial aspect of social sustainability because women and marginalized groups are disproportionately affected by climate-related issues and often lack representation in environmental policymaking.

Related Concepts:

  • How does gender equity relate to social sustainability and climate change?: Gender equity is a crucial aspect of social sustainability, as women and marginalized groups are disproportionately affected by climate-related issues and sustainability efforts. They face unequal consequences from natural disasters, carbon taxes, and transportation changes, and often lack representation in environmental policymaking despite being tasked with solving climate issues.

Weak sustainability posits that human-made capital can largely replace natural capital, often through technological advancements.

Answer: True

Weak sustainability is characterized by the belief that human-made capital can largely substitute for natural capital, often facilitated by technological progress.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference between 'weak sustainability' and 'strong sustainability' in the debate about environmental and economic dimensions?: In the debate about environmental and economic dimensions, 'weak sustainability' suggests that human-made capital can replace most natural capital, often through environmental technologies. In contrast, 'strong sustainability' posits that nature provides irreplaceable functions, such as biodiversity and fertile soils, that technology cannot replicate, thus emphasizing the preservation of ecological integrity.

Which dimension of sustainability is often emphasized in modern usage, particularly when addressing climate change and biodiversity loss?

Answer: The environmental dimension.

In modern discourse, particularly concerning climate change and biodiversity loss, the environmental dimension of sustainability is frequently emphasized.

Related Concepts:

  • How is sustainability generally understood in modern usage, and what dimension is often emphasized?: In modern usage, sustainability generally refers to a state where the environment, economy, and society can continue to exist over a long period. Many definitions, including those addressing climate change and biodiversity loss, emphasize the environmental dimension.

What is the primary controversy surrounding the economic dimension of sustainability?

Answer: The tension between 'welfare and prosperity for all' and environmental conservation.

The core controversy in the economic dimension of sustainability stems from the inherent tension and potential trade-offs between universal welfare and the imperative of environmental conservation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary controversy surrounding the economic dimension of sustainability?: The economic dimension of sustainability is controversial because there is tension between the ideas of 'welfare and prosperity for all' and environmental conservation, often necessitating trade-offs. Scholars discuss this under the concepts of 'weak and strong sustainability'.

What are the two linked goals of sustainable development?

Answer: To meet human development goals and enable natural systems to provide necessary resources and services.

Sustainable development is characterized by two interconnected goals: fulfilling human development needs and ensuring that natural systems can continuously provide the essential resources and ecosystem services for society and economies.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the two linked goals of sustainable development?: Sustainable development has two linked goals: first, to meet human development goals, and second, to enable natural systems to continue providing the natural resources and ecosystem services necessary for economies and society. This focuses on economic development, social development, and environmental protection for future generations.

Which of the following are the three commonly distinguished dimensions of sustainability?

Answer: Environmental, social, and economic.

Scholars consistently identify environmental, social, and economic as the three core dimensions, or pillars, of sustainability.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the three commonly distinguished dimensions of sustainability, and what are they often called?: Scholars usually distinguish three different dimensions of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic. These are often referred to as three pillars, dimensions, components, aspects, perspectives, factors, or goals.

Who was the economist responsible for the popular Venn diagram representing the three intersecting circles of sustainability in 1987?

Answer: Edward Barbier

The economist Edward Barbier is credited with introducing the widely recognized Venn diagram illustrating the three intersecting circles of sustainability in a 1987 article.

Related Concepts:

  • When and by whom did the popular Venn diagram representing the three intersecting circles of sustainability first appear?: The popular representation of sustainability as three intersecting circles, or a Venn diagram, first appeared in a 1987 article by the economist Edward Barbier.

Which dimension of sustainability do many experts consider the most important, setting limits for economic and social development?

Answer: The environmental dimension (planetary integrity).

Many experts prioritize the environmental dimension, often termed planetary or ecological integrity, as it fundamentally sets the boundaries for both economic and social development.

Related Concepts:

  • In the hierarchy of sustainability dimensions, which one is often considered the most important by many experts, and why?: Many experts consider the environmental dimension, also termed planetary integrity or ecological integrity, to be the most important. This is because it sets limits to economic and social development, implying that without a healthy environment, other forms of sustainability cannot be achieved.

What do the 'nested ellipses' diagram and the 'SDG wedding cake model' illustrate regarding sustainability dimensions?

Answer: A hierarchy where the environmental dimension is foundational, containing society, which contains the economy.

Both the 'nested ellipses' diagram and the 'SDG wedding cake model' depict a hierarchical relationship among sustainability dimensions, positioning the environmental dimension as the foundational basis that encompasses society and, subsequently, the economy.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'nested ellipses' diagram and the 'SDG wedding cake model' used to illustrate regarding sustainability dimensions?: Both the 'nested ellipses' diagram and the 'SDG wedding cake model' illustrate a hierarchy among the three dimensions of sustainability. They show that the environmental dimension (biosphere system) is the foundational basis, containing society, which in turn contains the economy, thereby emphasizing environmental limits.

How does the Brundtland report connect poverty with environmental problems?

Answer: It states that poverty both causes environmental problems and results from them.

The Brundtland report establishes a reciprocal relationship between poverty and environmental problems, asserting that poverty acts as both a cause and a consequence of environmental degradation.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the Brundtland report connect poverty with environmental problems?: The Brundtland report states that poverty both causes environmental problems and results from them. Therefore, effectively addressing environmental problems necessitates understanding and tackling the underlying factors of world poverty and inequality.

What is one definition of a socially sustainable society?

Answer: A society where people do not face structural obstacles in key areas like health, influence, and impartiality.

A socially sustainable society is characterized by the absence of structural impediments to individuals' well-being and participation in critical areas such as health, influence, competence, impartiality, and meaning-making.

Related Concepts:

  • What is one definition of a socially sustainable society?: One definition states that a society is socially sustainable if its people do not face structural obstacles in key areas such as health, influence, competence, impartiality, and meaning-making. This implies a society where individuals have equitable access to fundamental well-being and participation.

Why do some scholars place social issues at the very center of sustainability discussions?

Answer: Because all domains of sustainability (ecological, economic, political, cultural) are fundamentally social.

Some scholars argue for the centrality of social issues in sustainability, positing that all other domains—ecological, economic, political, and cultural—are fundamentally social constructs or manifestations.

Related Concepts:

  • Why do some scholars place social issues at the very center of sustainability discussions?: Some scholars place social issues at the very center of sustainability discussions, suggesting that all domains of sustainability—ecological, economic, political, and cultural—are fundamentally social. From this perspective, social sustainability encompasses all human activities and their relationship with the natural world.

What is the difference between 'weak sustainability' and 'strong sustainability'?

Answer: Weak sustainability suggests human-made capital can replace natural capital, while strong sustainability posits nature provides irreplaceable functions.

The distinction lies in their view of capital substitutability: weak sustainability allows for human-made capital to replace natural capital, whereas strong sustainability emphasizes the irreplaceable functions of natural capital.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference between 'weak sustainability' and 'strong sustainability' in the debate about environmental and economic dimensions?: In the debate about environmental and economic dimensions, 'weak sustainability' suggests that human-made capital can replace most natural capital, often through environmental technologies. In contrast, 'strong sustainability' posits that nature provides irreplaceable functions, such as biodiversity and fertile soils, that technology cannot replicate, thus emphasizing the preservation of ecological integrity.

Challenges, Criticisms, and Barriers to Sustainability

Dominant institutional frameworks that lead to market failures for public goods are considered intrinsic barriers to achieving a sustainability transformation.

Answer: False

Dominant institutional frameworks leading to market failures for public goods are considered extrinsic barriers to sustainability, not intrinsic ones.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some of the barriers that need to be addressed to achieve a sustainability transformation?: To achieve a sustainability transformation, many barriers must be addressed. Some arise from nature's complexity, while others are extrinsic to the concept, such as dominant institutional frameworks that may lead to market failures for public goods.
  • What are some extrinsic barriers to sustainability related to dominant institutional frameworks?: Extrinsic barriers to sustainability related to dominant institutional frameworks include market mechanisms failing for public goods, existing societies, economies, and cultures encouraging increased consumption, and a structural imperative for growth in competitive market economies, all of which inhibit necessary societal change.

The idea of sustainability has been criticized for being vague and potentially an impossible goal, with no country currently meeting citizens' needs within planetary boundaries.

Answer: True

Sustainability has been criticized for its vagueness and for potentially being an impossible goal, as no country currently meets its citizens' needs without exceeding planetary boundaries.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some criticisms leveled against the idea of sustainability?: The idea of sustainability has been criticized for being vague and merely a buzzword, and some argue that it might be an impossible goal to achieve. Experts also note that no country currently meets its citizens' needs without exceeding planetary boundaries.

The World Economic Forum in 2020 highlighted that less than a quarter of the world's GDP is vulnerable to nature loss.

Answer: False

The World Economic Forum in 2020 highlighted that over half of the world's GDP, specifically $44 trillion, is vulnerable to nature loss, not less than a quarter.

Related Concepts:

  • What economic risk did the World Economic Forum highlight in 2020 concerning nature?: In 2020, the World Economic Forum highlighted that $44 trillion of economic value generation, representing more than half of the world's GDP, depends on nature and is therefore vulnerable to nature loss. This loss is attributed to factors like land and sea use change, climate change, natural resource use, pollution, and invasive species.

Trade-offs between sustainability dimensions are rare because environmental, social, and economic goals are inherently aligned.

Answer: False

Trade-offs between sustainability dimensions are common and a frequent topic of debate because balancing environmental, social, and economic goals is often difficult due to their differing priorities.

Related Concepts:

  • Why are trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability a common topic for debate?: Trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability are a common topic for debate because balancing environmental, social, and economic goals is difficult, often due to disagreements about their relative importance. This necessitates integrating, balancing, and reconciling these dimensions, as humans must choose whether to prioritize or compromise ecological integrity.
  • What is the primary controversy surrounding the economic dimension of sustainability?: The economic dimension of sustainability is controversial because there is tension between the ideas of 'welfare and prosperity for all' and environmental conservation, often necessitating trade-offs. Scholars discuss this under the concepts of 'weak and strong sustainability'.

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2005 found that most of the 24 ecosystem services measured had improved over the preceding 50 years.

Answer: False

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2005 concluded that only four of the 24 ecosystem services measured had improved over the preceding 50 years, with most being in decline or precarious condition.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2005 conclude about ecosystem services?: The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2005, which measured 24 ecosystem services, concluded that only four had improved over the preceding 50 years, while 15 were in serious decline and five were in a precarious condition, indicating a widespread degradation of natural support systems.

The 'value-action gap' describes a situation where people consistently act in accordance with their stated environmental convictions.

Answer: False

The 'value-action gap' refers to the disconnect between individuals' stated environmental convictions and their actual behaviors, indicating an inconsistency rather than consistent action.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'value-action gap' as an intrinsic barrier to sustainability?: The 'value-action gap' is an intrinsic barrier to sustainability that reflects the common phenomenon where people often do not act in accordance with their stated convictions or values regarding environmental protection. This disconnect makes it difficult to translate good intentions into sustainable behaviors.

Dennis Meadows criticized the Brundtland definition of sustainability, arguing it often fails to meet present needs and diminishes future generations' options.

Answer: True

Dennis Meadows criticized the Brundtland definition, asserting that it often leads to self-deception, failing to genuinely meet present needs and frequently diminishing the options available to future generations.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did Dennis Meadows criticize the Brundtland definition of sustainability?: Dennis Meadows criticized the Brundtland definition of sustainability, arguing that many people deceive themselves by using it. He contended that the needs of the present generation are often not truly met, and economic activities aimed at current needs frequently diminish the options available to future generations.

Greenwashing is a transparent marketing practice that accurately informs consumers about a product's environmental benefits.

Answer: False

Greenwashing is a deceptive marketing practice that provides misleading information about the environmental sustainability of products or activities, rather than transparently informing consumers.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'greenwashing,' and why is it a concern for investors and consumers?: Greenwashing is a deceptive marketing practice where a company or organization provides misleading information about the environmental sustainability of a product, policy, or activity. It is a concern for investors because it exposes them to risk, and for consumers because it can lead to confusion and mistrust regarding the authenticity of eco-labels and claims.

Which of the following is an extrinsic barrier to achieving a sustainability transformation?

Answer: Dominant institutional frameworks leading to market failures for public goods.

Extrinsic barriers to sustainability transformation include dominant institutional frameworks that result in market failures for public goods, hindering societal change.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some of the barriers that need to be addressed to achieve a sustainability transformation?: To achieve a sustainability transformation, many barriers must be addressed. Some arise from nature's complexity, while others are extrinsic to the concept, such as dominant institutional frameworks that may lead to market failures for public goods.
  • What are some extrinsic barriers to sustainability related to dominant institutional frameworks?: Extrinsic barriers to sustainability related to dominant institutional frameworks include market mechanisms failing for public goods, existing societies, economies, and cultures encouraging increased consumption, and a structural imperative for growth in competitive market economies, all of which inhibit necessary societal change.

What economic risk did the World Economic Forum highlight in 2020 concerning nature?

Answer: That $44 trillion of economic value generation, more than half of the world's GDP, depends on nature and is vulnerable to nature loss.

In 2020, the World Economic Forum underscored the significant economic risk posed by nature loss, revealing that $44 trillion, or over half of the global GDP, is dependent on nature and thus vulnerable.

Related Concepts:

  • What economic risk did the World Economic Forum highlight in 2020 concerning nature?: In 2020, the World Economic Forum highlighted that $44 trillion of economic value generation, representing more than half of the world's GDP, depends on nature and is therefore vulnerable to nature loss. This loss is attributed to factors like land and sea use change, climate change, natural resource use, pollution, and invasive species.

Why are trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability a common topic for debate?

Answer: Because balancing these goals is difficult due to disagreements about their relative importance.

Trade-offs among sustainability dimensions are frequently debated because reconciling environmental, social, and economic objectives is challenging, often due to divergent views on their relative importance and priorities.

Related Concepts:

  • Why are trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability a common topic for debate?: Trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability are a common topic for debate because balancing environmental, social, and economic goals is difficult, often due to disagreements about their relative importance. This necessitates integrating, balancing, and reconciling these dimensions, as humans must choose whether to prioritize or compromise ecological integrity.

What is the concept of 'planetary boundaries'?

Answer: The limits of Earth's carrying capacity that should not be crossed to prevent irreversible harm.

The concept of 'planetary boundaries' delineates the Earth's carrying capacity limits, which, if transgressed, risk triggering irreversible and potentially catastrophic environmental changes.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the concept of 'planetary boundaries,' and what environmental issues do they involve?: The concept of 'planetary boundaries' refers to the limits of Earth's carrying capacity, which should not be crossed to prevent irreversible harm to the planet. These boundaries involve environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss (now referred to as change in biosphere integrity), biogeochemical pollution (nitrogen and phosphorus), ocean acidification, land use, freshwater scarcity, ozone depletion, atmospheric aerosols, and chemical pollution (now called introduction of novel entities).

What did the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2005 conclude about ecosystem services?

Answer: Only four had improved, while most were in decline or precarious condition.

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment of 2005 revealed a concerning trend: only four of the 24 ecosystem services evaluated had improved over the preceding 50 years, with the majority experiencing decline or precarious conditions.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2005 conclude about ecosystem services?: The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2005, which measured 24 ecosystem services, concluded that only four had improved over the preceding 50 years, while 15 were in serious decline and five were in a precarious condition, indicating a widespread degradation of natural support systems.

What is the 'value-action gap' as an intrinsic barrier to sustainability?

Answer: The disconnect between people's stated environmental convictions and their actual behaviors.

The 'value-action gap' represents an intrinsic barrier to sustainability, describing the common discrepancy between individuals' expressed environmental values and their actual, often inconsistent, behaviors.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'value-action gap' as an intrinsic barrier to sustainability?: The 'value-action gap' is an intrinsic barrier to sustainability that reflects the common phenomenon where people often do not act in accordance with their stated convictions or values regarding environmental protection. This disconnect makes it difficult to translate good intentions into sustainable behaviors.

Which of the following is an extrinsic barrier to sustainability related to dominant institutional frameworks?

Answer: Market mechanisms failing for public goods.

Extrinsic barriers to sustainability, particularly those stemming from dominant institutional frameworks, include the failure of market mechanisms to adequately account for public goods, leading to their degradation.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some extrinsic barriers to sustainability related to dominant institutional frameworks?: Extrinsic barriers to sustainability related to dominant institutional frameworks include market mechanisms failing for public goods, existing societies, economies, and cultures encouraging increased consumption, and a structural imperative for growth in competitive market economies, all of which inhibit necessary societal change.
  • What are some of the barriers that need to be addressed to achieve a sustainability transformation?: To achieve a sustainability transformation, many barriers must be addressed. Some arise from nature's complexity, while others are extrinsic to the concept, such as dominant institutional frameworks that may lead to market failures for public goods.

Why did Dennis Meadows criticize the Brundtland definition of sustainability?

Answer: He argued it often fails to meet present needs and diminishes future generations' options.

Dennis Meadows critiqued the Brundtland definition, contending that its application frequently results in a failure to genuinely meet present needs and, paradoxically, reduces the options available to future generations.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did Dennis Meadows criticize the Brundtland definition of sustainability?: Dennis Meadows criticized the Brundtland definition of sustainability, arguing that many people deceive themselves by using it. He contended that the needs of the present generation are often not truly met, and economic activities aimed at current needs frequently diminish the options available to future generations.

What is 'greenwashing'?

Answer: A deceptive marketing practice that provides misleading information about environmental sustainability.

Greenwashing is a deceptive marketing tactic involving the provision of misleading information regarding the environmental sustainability of a product, policy, or activity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'greenwashing,' and why is it a concern for investors and consumers?: Greenwashing is a deceptive marketing practice where a company or organization provides misleading information about the environmental sustainability of a product, policy, or activity. It is a concern for investors because it exposes them to risk, and for consumers because it can lead to confusion and mistrust regarding the authenticity of eco-labels and claims.

Pathways and Strategies for Sustainability Transformation

The Rio Declaration from 1992 and Agenda 2030 from 2015 have reinforced sustainability by focusing exclusively on its environmental dimension.

Answer: False

The Rio Declaration and Agenda 2030 reinforced sustainability by balancing its economic, social, and environmental dimensions, not by focusing exclusively on the environmental aspect.

Related Concepts:

  • What international agreements have reinforced the concept of sustainability with economic, social, and environmental dimensions?: The Rio Declaration from 1992, along with its associated plan Agenda 21, and Agenda 2030 from 2015, which includes the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), have all reinforced the concept of sustainability by balancing its economic, social, and environmental dimensions.

The IPAT formula suggests that increasing environmental sustainability can be achieved by increasing human population, affluence, and technology.

Answer: False

The IPAT formula indicates that environmental impact is proportional to population, affluence, and technology; therefore, increasing these factors would generally decrease, not increase, environmental sustainability.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the IPAT formula measure the environmental impact of humans, and what does it imply for increasing environmental sustainability?: The IPAT formula, which emerged in the 1970s, measures the environmental impact of humans as proportional to human population, affluence, and technology. This implies that increasing environmental sustainability can be achieved by controlling human population, reducing consumption and affluence, or developing innovative green technologies like renewable energy.

A sustainability transformation is a simple, single-layered process focused solely on technological advancements.

Answer: False

A sustainability transformation is a complex, deep, and system-wide process that encompasses changes in technology, economy, society, values, and goals, not a simple, single-layered process focused solely on technology.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'sustainability transformation' or 'transition,' and what does it entail?: A 'sustainability transformation' or 'transition' refers to a deep, system-wide change affecting technology, economy, society, values, and goals. It is a complex, multi-layered process that must occur at all scales, from local communities to global governance institutions, and often involves political debate and challenges to existing power structures.

A sustainability transition requires fundamental value changes, including an emphasis on material sufficiency and global equity.

Answer: True

Achieving a sustainability transition necessitates fundamental shifts in societal values, including a greater emphasis on quality of life, material sufficiency, human solidarity, global equity, and an affinity with nature.

Related Concepts:

  • What fundamental value changes are required for a sustainability transition?: A sustainability transition requires major changes in societies' fundamental values and organizing principles. These new values would emphasize the quality of life and material sufficiency, human solidarity and global equity, and an affinity with nature and environmental sustainability.

Sustainability transitions can only be led by government initiatives, excluding market or citizen-led processes.

Answer: False

Sustainability transitions can be driven by various overlapping processes, including those led by technology, markets, government, or citizens, not exclusively by government initiatives.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the four possible overlapping processes that can lead to sustainability transitions?: Sustainability transitions can come about through four possible overlapping processes, each with different political dynamics: these processes can be led by technology, markets, government, or citizens.

The 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals' includes 17 SDGs and pledges to protect the planet through sustainable consumption and climate action.

Answer: True

The 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals' indeed comprises 17 SDGs and includes a primary pledge to protect the planet through sustainable consumption, resource management, and urgent climate action.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals,' and what is its primary pledge?: The 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals' refers to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agreed upon by the United Nations in 2015. Its primary pledge is to protect the planet from degradation, including through sustainable consumption and production, managing natural resources sustainably, and taking urgent action on climate change to support present and future generations.

Eco-economic decoupling is measured by tracking changes in the emission intensity associated with economic output.

Answer: True

Eco-economic decoupling is precisely measured by monitoring changes in the emission intensity relative to economic output, aiming to separate environmental impact from economic growth.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'eco-economic decoupling,' and how is it measured?: Eco-economic decoupling is the idea of resolving trade-offs between economic growth and environmental conservation by separating 'environmental bads' from 'economic goods.' It means using fewer resources per unit of economic output and reducing the environmental impact of economic activities, and it is measured by tracking changes in the emission intensity associated with economic output.

Absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling is widely achieved and sufficient on its own to reduce environmental pressures.

Answer: False

Absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling is considered rare and, even when achieved, is deemed insufficient on its own, requiring complementary sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict reduction targets.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling considered rare and insufficient on its own?: Absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling is considered rare, and even when achieved in some industrialized countries (e.g., decoupling GDP growth from CO2 emissions), it is deemed insufficient on its own. Experts argue it must be accompanied by sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict enforcement of absolute reduction targets to truly reduce environmental pressures.

The 'circular economy' aims to decouple environmental pressure from economic growth by designing out waste and keeping materials in use.

Answer: True

The 'circular economy' model seeks to decouple environmental pressure from economic growth by prioritizing the design-out of waste and pollution, maintaining materials in use, and regenerating natural systems.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the goal of the 'circular economy' concept in business?: The goal of the 'circular economy' concept in business is to decouple environmental pressure from economic growth. This involves designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems, moving away from a linear 'take, make, waste' model.

Which international agreements have reinforced the concept of sustainability by balancing its economic, social, and environmental dimensions?

Answer: The Rio Declaration (1992) and Agenda 2030 (2015).

The Rio Declaration of 1992 and Agenda 2030 of 2015 are key international agreements that have significantly reinforced the concept of sustainability by advocating for a balance across its economic, social, and environmental dimensions.

Related Concepts:

  • What international agreements have reinforced the concept of sustainability with economic, social, and environmental dimensions?: The Rio Declaration from 1992, along with its associated plan Agenda 21, and Agenda 2030 from 2015, which includes the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), have all reinforced the concept of sustainability by balancing its economic, social, and environmental dimensions.

According to the IPAT formula, which factor is NOT implied as a way to increase environmental sustainability?

Answer: Increasing per capita resource consumption.

The IPAT formula posits that environmental impact is directly proportional to population, affluence, and technology; therefore, increasing per capita resource consumption would diminish, not enhance, environmental sustainability.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the IPAT formula measure the environmental impact of humans, and what does it imply for increasing environmental sustainability?: The IPAT formula, which emerged in the 1970s, measures the environmental impact of humans as proportional to human population, affluence, and technology. This implies that increasing environmental sustainability can be achieved by controlling human population, reducing consumption and affluence, or developing innovative green technologies like renewable energy.

What does a 'sustainability transformation' or 'transition' entail?

Answer: A deep, system-wide change affecting technology, economy, society, values, and goals.

A 'sustainability transformation' or 'transition' signifies a profound, system-wide alteration encompassing technology, economy, society, values, and overarching goals, requiring multi-scalar and often politically charged changes.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'sustainability transformation' or 'transition,' and what does it entail?: A 'sustainability transformation' or 'transition' refers to a deep, system-wide change affecting technology, economy, society, values, and goals. It is a complex, multi-layered process that must occur at all scales, from local communities to global governance institutions, and often involves political debate and challenges to existing power structures.

What fundamental value changes are required for a sustainability transition?

Answer: Emphasis on quality of life, material sufficiency, human solidarity, global equity, and affinity with nature.

A sustainability transition necessitates fundamental shifts in societal values, prioritizing quality of life, material sufficiency, human solidarity, global equity, and a deep affinity with nature.

Related Concepts:

  • What fundamental value changes are required for a sustainability transition?: A sustainability transition requires major changes in societies' fundamental values and organizing principles. These new values would emphasize the quality of life and material sufficiency, human solidarity and global equity, and an affinity with nature and environmental sustainability.

What are the four possible overlapping processes that can lead to sustainability transitions?

Answer: Technology, markets, government, or citizens.

Sustainability transitions can emerge from four distinct yet overlapping processes: those driven by technology, markets, government policies, or citizen initiatives.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the four possible overlapping processes that can lead to sustainability transitions?: Sustainability transitions can come about through four possible overlapping processes, each with different political dynamics: these processes can be led by technology, markets, government, or citizens.

What is the primary pledge of the 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals'?

Answer: To protect the planet from degradation through sustainable consumption, resource management, and climate action.

The 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals' primarily pledges to safeguard the planet from degradation through sustainable consumption and production, responsible natural resource management, and urgent climate action.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals,' and what is its primary pledge?: The 'Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals' refers to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agreed upon by the United Nations in 2015. Its primary pledge is to protect the planet from degradation, including through sustainable consumption and production, managing natural resources sustainably, and taking urgent action on climate change to support present and future generations.

How is 'eco-economic decoupling' measured?

Answer: By tracking changes in the emission intensity associated with economic output.

Eco-economic decoupling is quantified by monitoring the changes in emission intensity relative to economic output, indicating the extent to which economic growth is separated from environmental impact.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'eco-economic decoupling,' and how is it measured?: Eco-economic decoupling is the idea of resolving trade-offs between economic growth and environmental conservation by separating 'environmental bads' from 'economic goods.' It means using fewer resources per unit of economic output and reducing the environmental impact of economic activities, and it is measured by tracking changes in the emission intensity associated with economic output.

Why is absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling considered insufficient on its own?

Answer: Because it must be accompanied by sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict absolute reduction targets.

Absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling, while desirable, is deemed insufficient on its own; it requires complementary sufficiency-oriented strategies and stringent absolute reduction targets to effectively alleviate environmental pressures.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling considered rare and insufficient on its own?: Absolute long-term eco-economic decoupling is considered rare, and even when achieved in some industrialized countries (e.g., decoupling GDP growth from CO2 emissions), it is deemed insufficient on its own. Experts argue it must be accompanied by sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict enforcement of absolute reduction targets to truly reduce environmental pressures.

What is the goal of the 'circular economy' concept in business?

Answer: To decouple environmental pressure from economic growth by designing out waste and keeping materials in use.

The 'circular economy' aims to decouple environmental pressure from economic growth by systematically designing out waste and pollution, ensuring products and materials remain in use, and regenerating natural systems.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the goal of the 'circular economy' concept in business?: The goal of the 'circular economy' concept in business is to decouple environmental pressure from economic growth. This involves designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems, moving away from a linear 'take, make, waste' model.

Measurement, Governance, and Economic Models

A universal set of sustainability indicators exists, making the measurement of sustainability straightforward across all contexts.

Answer: False

Measuring sustainability is challenging because the concept is complex and contextual, and a universal set of sustainability indicators does not exist.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is measuring sustainability considered challenging?: Measuring sustainability is challenging because the concept itself is complex, contextual, and dynamic, lacking a fixed definition. While indicators have been developed for environmental, social, and economic aspects, a universal set of sustainability indicators does not exist.

Global organizations like the UN and WTO are highly effective in enforcing global sustainability regulations due to their strong sanctioning mechanisms.

Answer: False

Global organizations such as the UN and WTO often lack suitable sanctioning mechanisms, which hinders their effectiveness in enforcing global sustainability regulations.

Related Concepts:

  • How do global organizations like the UN and WTO face challenges in enforcing global sustainability regulations?: Existing global organizations like the UN and WTO are seen as inefficient in enforcing current global regulations because they often lack suitable sanctioning mechanisms. This makes it difficult to ensure compliance with international agreements.

Environmental and social costs are often unaddressed in market prices because the entities creating them typically do not pay for these 'externalities.'

Answer: True

Environmental and social costs are frequently externalized, meaning the entities responsible for creating them do not bear the financial burden, leading to these costs not being reflected in market prices.

Related Concepts:

  • How do environmental and social costs often go unaddressed in market prices, and what is needed to resolve this?: Environmental and social costs often go unaddressed because the entity creating them typically does not pay for them, and market prices do not reflect these 'externalities.' Government policy or local governance is usually required to resolve this problem, for example, through taxation, subsidies, or legal limits on damaging practices.

Doughnut economics establishes a social minimum standard and recognizes planetary carrying capacity as an ecological limit.

Answer: True

Doughnut economics, as developed by Kate Raworth, integrates social minimum standards with the recognition of planetary ecological limits, creating a framework for sustainable economic activity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'doughnut economics,' and how does it integrate social and environmental sustainability into economic thinking?: Doughnut economics, developed by Kate Raworth, integrates social and environmental sustainability into economic thinking by establishing a social dimension as a minimum standard for society to aspire to, while simultaneously recognizing the planet's carrying capacity as an outer ecological limit.

Government action is often necessary for managing natural resources because market forces alone tend to lead to over-exploitation.

Answer: True

Government intervention is frequently essential for managing natural resources and environmental issues, as reliance solely on market forces often results in the long-term over-exploitation and degradation of these resources.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is government action often necessary for managing natural resources and environmental issues?: Government action is often necessary for managing natural resources and environmental issues because leaving these entirely to market forces typically leads to the over-exploitation and destruction of natural resources in the long run. Market prices often fail to reflect the true environmental and social costs.

Elinor Ostrom proposed that common natural resources are best managed exclusively by national governments.

Answer: False

Elinor Ostrom proposed local governance (self-governance) as an effective alternative to both market forces and national government for managing common natural resources, not exclusive national government management.

Related Concepts:

  • What alternative to market forces and national government did Elinor Ostrom propose for managing common natural resources?: Elinor Ostrom, a Nobel Prize winner in Economics, proposed local governance (or self-governance) as a third option, besides market forces or national government, for managing common natural resources. She demonstrated that local communities can successfully establish rules for the use and maintenance of shared resources like pastures and forests, leading to both economic and ecological sustainability.

Multilateral international agreements are highly effective in achieving sustainability due to strong enforcement mechanisms and comprehensive regulation for all actors.

Answer: False

Multilateral international agreements face significant challenges in achieving sustainability, including a reliance on voluntary commitments, a lack of robust enforcement mechanisms, and gaps in regulation for international actors.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some challenges faced by multilateral international agreements and intergovernmental organizations in achieving sustainability?: Multilateral international agreements and intergovernmental organizations face challenges such as reliance on voluntary commitments (like Nationally Determined Contributions), a lack of enforcement mechanisms for existing regulations, gaps in regulation for international actors, and criticisms regarding their legitimacy and democracy.

The 'triple bottom line' accounting framework focuses solely on financial profit in sustainable business practices.

Answer: False

The 'triple bottom line' accounting framework integrates ecological, social, and economic concerns ('people, planet, and profit'), not solely financial profit, into sustainable business practices.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'triple bottom line' accounting framework in sustainable business practices?: The 'triple bottom line' is an accounting framework used in sustainable business practices that integrates ecological, social, and economic concerns. It uses the phrase 'people, planet, and profit' to represent these three dimensions, aiming for a holistic view of business performance.

Why is measuring sustainability considered challenging?

Answer: Because the concept is complex, contextual, dynamic, and lacks a universal set of indicators.

Measuring sustainability is inherently challenging due to its complex, contextual, and dynamic nature, coupled with the absence of a universally agreed-upon set of indicators.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is measuring sustainability considered challenging?: Measuring sustainability is challenging because the concept itself is complex, contextual, and dynamic, lacking a fixed definition. While indicators have been developed for environmental, social, and economic aspects, a universal set of sustainability indicators does not exist.

What is a key challenge faced by global organizations like the UN and WTO in enforcing global sustainability regulations?

Answer: They often lack suitable sanctioning mechanisms.

A significant challenge for global organizations like the UN and WTO in enforcing sustainability regulations is the frequent absence of suitable sanctioning mechanisms, which impedes compliance.

Related Concepts:

  • How do global organizations like the UN and WTO face challenges in enforcing global sustainability regulations?: Existing global organizations like the UN and WTO are seen as inefficient in enforcing current global regulations because they often lack suitable sanctioning mechanisms. This makes it difficult to ensure compliance with international agreements.
  • What are some challenges faced by multilateral international agreements and intergovernmental organizations in achieving sustainability?: Multilateral international agreements and intergovernmental organizations face challenges such as reliance on voluntary commitments (like Nationally Determined Contributions), a lack of enforcement mechanisms for existing regulations, gaps in regulation for international actors, and criticisms regarding their legitimacy and democracy.

What is 'doughnut economics' designed to integrate into economic thinking?

Answer: Social minimum standards and planetary ecological limits.

Doughnut economics, conceptualized by Kate Raworth, aims to integrate both social minimum standards and the Earth's planetary ecological limits into a holistic framework for economic thought and practice.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'doughnut economics,' and how does it integrate social and environmental sustainability into economic thinking?: Doughnut economics, developed by Kate Raworth, integrates social and environmental sustainability into economic thinking by establishing a social dimension as a minimum standard for society to aspire to, while simultaneously recognizing the planet's carrying capacity as an outer ecological limit.

What alternative to market forces and national government did Elinor Ostrom propose for managing common natural resources?

Answer: Local governance (self-governance).

Elinor Ostrom advocated for local governance, or self-governance, as a viable and effective alternative to centralized government or market forces for the sustainable management of common natural resources.

Related Concepts:

  • What alternative to market forces and national government did Elinor Ostrom propose for managing common natural resources?: Elinor Ostrom, a Nobel Prize winner in Economics, proposed local governance (or self-governance) as a third option, besides market forces or national government, for managing common natural resources. She demonstrated that local communities can successfully establish rules for the use and maintenance of shared resources like pastures and forests, leading to both economic and ecological sustainability.

What is the 'triple bottom line' accounting framework in sustainable business practices?

Answer: A framework that integrates ecological, social, and economic concerns ('people, planet, and profit').

The 'triple bottom line' is an accounting framework that holistically integrates ecological, social, and economic performance, often summarized as 'people, planet, and profit,' in sustainable business practices.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'triple bottom line' accounting framework in sustainable business practices?: The 'triple bottom line' is an accounting framework used in sustainable business practices that integrates ecological, social, and economic concerns. It uses the phrase 'people, planet, and profit' to represent these three dimensions, aiming for a holistic view of business performance.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy