Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


The Tai Language Family: Structure, History, and Classification

At a Glance

Title: The Tai Language Family: Structure, History, and Classification

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Tai Language Family: Classification and Demographics: 6 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Nomenclature and Linguistic Identity: 7 flashcards, 11 questions
  • Historical Origins and Early Linguistic Evidence: 7 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Traditional Tai Language Classifications: 9 flashcards, 14 questions
  • Phylogenetic and Phonological Analyses: 16 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Writing Systems and Comparative Lexicon: 9 flashcards, 11 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 57
  • True/False Questions: 40
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 39
  • Total Questions: 79

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The Tai Language Family: Structure, History, and Classification

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Tai languages" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The Tai Language Family: Structure, History, and Classification

Study Guide: The Tai Language Family: Structure, History, and Classification

Tai Language Family: Classification and Demographics

Tai languages are classified as a branch of the Kra–Dai language family, sometimes further subgrouped under Kam–Tai and Be–Tai.

Answer: True

Tai languages are indeed a branch of the Kra–Dai language family, with further subgroupings sometimes including Kam–Tai and Be–Tai.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the broader linguistic classification of the Tai languages?: The Tai languages are classified as a branch of the Kra–Dai language family. Within this family, they are sometimes considered part of the Kam–Tai and then the Be–Tai subgroups before reaching the Tai classification.

The geographic distribution of Tai languages is limited to Southeast Asia, with no significant presence in China or India.

Answer: False

Tai languages are geographically distributed across Southern China, Southeast Asia, and parts of Northeast India, indicating a broader presence than just Southeast Asia.

Related Concepts:

  • Where are Tai languages geographically distributed?: Tai languages are geographically distributed across Southern China, specifically in regions like Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan, and Guangdong. They are also widely spoken throughout Southeast Asia and in parts of Northeast India.

Standard Thai, Lao, Shan, and Zhuang are among the most widely spoken languages within the Tai family.

Answer: True

Standard Thai, Lao, Shan, and Zhuang are explicitly mentioned as some of the most widely spoken languages within the Tai family.

Related Concepts:

  • Which are some of the most widely spoken languages within the Tai family?: The Tai languages include some of the most widely spoken languages of the Tai–Kadai family. These include Standard Thai (also known as Siamese), which is the national language of Thailand; Lao (or Laotian), the national language of Laos; Shan language, spoken in Myanmar; and Zhuang, a major language in China's Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.

The Zhuang people are China's second-largest minority ethnic group, primarily residing in Hunan province.

Answer: False

The Zhuang people constitute China's largest minority ethnic group, not the second-largest, and primarily reside in Guangxi, not Hunan province.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the Zhuang language and its speakers in China?: Zhuang is a significant Tai language spoken by the Zhuang people, who constitute China's largest minority ethnic group. With a population of 15.55 million, they primarily reside in Guangxi, with others scattered across Yunnan, Guangdong, Guizhou, and Hunan provinces.

In Vietnam, Central Tai languages are known as Zhuang, while in China, they are referred to as Tay and Nung.

Answer: False

The statement reverses the geographic distribution: Central Tai languages are known as Zhuang in China, and Tay and Nung in Vietnam.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Central Tai languages called in China and Vietnam?: Central Tai languages are designated as Zhuang in China, whereas in Vietnam, they are known as Tay and Nung.

Standard Zhuang is based on the dialect spoken in Wuming District's Shuangqiao.

Answer: True

Standard Zhuang is indeed based on the dialect spoken in Shuangqiao (双桥) within Wuming District.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the dialectal basis for Standard Zhuang?: Standard Zhuang is founded upon the dialect spoken in Shuangqiao (双桥), located within Wuming District.

What is the broader linguistic classification to which Tai languages belong?

Answer: Kra–Dai

Tai languages are classified as a branch of the Kra–Dai language family.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the broader linguistic classification of the Tai languages?: The Tai languages are classified as a branch of the Kra–Dai language family. Within this family, they are sometimes considered part of the Kam–Tai and then the Be–Tai subgroups before reaching the Tai classification.

In which region of China are Tai languages NOT explicitly mentioned as being geographically distributed?

Answer: Sichuan

The geographic distribution of Tai languages in China explicitly mentions Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan, and Guangdong, but not Sichuan.

Related Concepts:

  • Where are Tai languages geographically distributed?: Tai languages are geographically distributed across Southern China, specifically in regions like Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan, and Guangdong. They are also widely spoken throughout Southeast Asia and in parts of Northeast India.

Which of these languages is the national language of Laos and a widely spoken language within the Tai family?

Answer: Lao

Lao (or Laotian) is identified as the national language of Laos and one of the most widely spoken languages within the Tai family.

Related Concepts:

  • Which are some of the most widely spoken languages within the Tai family?: The Tai languages include some of the most widely spoken languages of the Tai–Kadai family. These include Standard Thai (also known as Siamese), which is the national language of Thailand; Lao (or Laotian), the national language of Laos; Shan language, spoken in Myanmar; and Zhuang, a major language in China's Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.

What is the population size of the Zhuang people, China's largest minority ethnic group?

Answer: 15.55 million

The Zhuang people, China's largest minority ethnic group, have a population of 15.55 million.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the Zhuang language and its speakers in China?: Zhuang is a significant Tai language spoken by the Zhuang people, who constitute China's largest minority ethnic group. With a population of 15.55 million, they primarily reside in Guangxi, with others scattered across Yunnan, Guangdong, Guizhou, and Hunan provinces.

What are the Central Tai languages called in Vietnam?

Answer: Tay and Nung

In Vietnam, the Central Tai languages are known as Tay and Nung, while in China they are referred to as Zhuang.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Central Tai languages called in China and Vietnam?: Central Tai languages are designated as Zhuang in China, whereas in Vietnam, they are known as Tay and Nung.

What is the dialectal basis for Standard Zhuang?

Answer: The dialect spoken in Shuangqiao, Wuming District.

Standard Zhuang is based on the dialect spoken in Shuangqiao (双桥), located in Wuming District.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the dialectal basis for Standard Zhuang?: Standard Zhuang is founded upon the dialect spoken in Shuangqiao (双桥), located within Wuming District.

Nomenclature and Linguistic Identity

The Tai language family is exclusively known as Tai languages, without any alternative names.

Answer: False

The Tai language family is also known by alternative names such as Zhuang–Tai or Daic languages, which are used interchangeably.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the primary names used to refer to the Tai language family?: The Tai language family is primarily known as Tai, Zhuang–Tai, or Daic languages. These terms are used interchangeably to refer to this branch of the Kra–Dai language family.

In English linguistics, 'Thai' is the generic name for the language family, while 'Tai' refers specifically to the national language of Thailand.

Answer: False

In English linguistics, 'Tai' is the generic name for the language family, while 'Thai' refers to the national language of Thailand. The question reverses these definitions.

Related Concepts:

  • How is 'Tai' distinguished from 'Thai' in the institutional context of Thailand?: Within Thailand's institutional context, 'Tai' (and its Thai-script spelling without a final -y) is specifically used to refer to varieties of the language family not indigenous to Thailand or spoken there only due to recent immigration. In this specific usage, 'Thai' itself is not categorized as a 'Tai' language.
  • How is the term 'Tai' generally used in English linguistics?: In English linguistics, 'Tai' is the established generic name for the language family. However, cognates such as 'Thai' and 'Dai' are also employed by speakers of many Tai languages.

Anthony Diller noted that Lao scholars have suggested Thai should be considered a member of the Lao language family, rather than Lao being classified as Tai.

Answer: True

Anthony Diller indeed reported that Lao scholars have expressed a preference for classifying Thai as part of the Lao language family, challenging the conventional classification.

Related Concepts:

  • What alternative perspectives exist regarding the classification of Lao and Thai languages, according to Anthony Diller?: According to Anthony Diller, Lao scholars have expressed a preference for classifying Thai as a member of the Lao language family, rather than Lao being subordinate to Tai. This perspective is sometimes supported by references to ancient Chinese characters for 'Lao'.

Paul K. Benedict (1975) used the term 'Thai' to refer to a narrower grouping than what is now generally called 'Tai'.

Answer: False

Paul K. Benedict (1975) used 'Thai' to refer to a *broader* grouping, encompassing what is now generally called 'Tai', not a narrower one.

Related Concepts:

  • How have some scholars, like Benedict, used the term 'Thai' in earlier linguistic works?: In earlier linguistic scholarship, such as that by Paul K. Benedict (1975), the term 'Thai' was used to denote a broader grouping, encompassing what is now generally referred to as 'Tai'. This usage led to designations like 'proto-Thai' and 'Austro-Thai'.

In Thailand's institutional context, 'Tai' is used to denote varieties of the language family not spoken in Thailand or spoken there only due to recent immigration.

Answer: True

In Thailand's institutional context, 'Tai' specifically refers to varieties of the language family that are not indigenous to Thailand or are present due to recent immigration.

Related Concepts:

  • How is 'Tai' distinguished from 'Thai' in the institutional context of Thailand?: Within Thailand's institutional context, 'Tai' (and its Thai-script spelling without a final -y) is specifically used to refer to varieties of the language family not indigenous to Thailand or spoken there only due to recent immigration. In this specific usage, 'Thai' itself is not categorized as a 'Tai' language.

Scholars like William J. Gedney and Li Fang-Kuei preferred 'Thai' over 'Siamese' for the standard language of Thailand to emphasize its connection to the broader Tai family.

Answer: False

Scholars like Gedney and Li Fang-Kuei preferred 'Siamese' over 'Thai' for the standard language of Thailand to *reduce confusion* between the national language and the broader Tai language family, not to emphasize connection.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did scholars like Gedney and Li prefer 'Siamese' over 'Thai' for the standard language of Thailand?: Scholars such as William J. Gedney and Li Fang-Kuei preferred the term 'Siamese' over 'Thai' for the standard language of Thailand. This preference aimed to mitigate potential confusion for English speakers between 'Thai' (referring to the national language) and 'Tai' (referring to the broader language family), particularly given the subtle phonetic distinctions.

Michel Ferlus proposed that the ethnonyms Tai/Thai originated from the etymon *k(ə)ri:, meaning 'human being'.

Answer: True

Michel Ferlus's etymological research indeed suggests that the ethnonyms Tai/Thai evolved from the Proto-Tai etymon *k(ə)ri:, signifying 'human being'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Michel Ferlus's proposed etymology for the ethnonyms Tai/Thai?: Michel Ferlus posits that the ethnonyms Tai/Thai (or Tay/Thay) originated from the etymon *k(ə)ri:, meaning 'human being'. This evolution involved a series of phonetic transformations, including consonant shifts and diphthongization, culminating in forms such as *dajA in Proto-Southwestern Tai, and subsequently tʰajA2 in Siamese and Lao, or tajA2 in other Southwestern and Central Tai languages.

Which of the following is NOT an alternative name used to refer to the Tai language family?

Answer: Austro-Thai

The Tai language family is known by names such as Tai, Zhuang–Tai, and Daic languages. 'Austro-Thai' refers to a broader, hypothesized macrofamily, not an alternative name for the Tai family itself.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the term 'Tai' generally used in English linguistics?: In English linguistics, 'Tai' is the established generic name for the language family. However, cognates such as 'Thai' and 'Dai' are also employed by speakers of many Tai languages.
  • What are the primary names used to refer to the Tai language family?: The Tai language family is primarily known as Tai, Zhuang–Tai, or Daic languages. These terms are used interchangeably to refer to this branch of the Kra–Dai language family.

According to Anthony Diller, what alternative perspective have Lao scholars expressed regarding the classification of Lao and Thai?

Answer: That Thai should be considered a member of the Lao language family.

Anthony Diller noted that Lao scholars have suggested that Thai should be considered a member of the Lao language family, rather than Lao being classified under Tai.

Related Concepts:

  • What alternative perspectives exist regarding the classification of Lao and Thai languages, according to Anthony Diller?: According to Anthony Diller, Lao scholars have expressed a preference for classifying Thai as a member of the Lao language family, rather than Lao being subordinate to Tai. This perspective is sometimes supported by references to ancient Chinese characters for 'Lao'.

Why did scholars like Gedney and Li prefer 'Siamese' over 'Thai' for the standard language of Thailand?

Answer: To reduce confusion between the national language and the broader language family.

Scholars such as William J. Gedney and Li Fang-Kuei preferred 'Siamese' to 'Thai' for the standard language of Thailand to reduce potential confusion between the national language and the broader Tai language family.

Related Concepts:

  • Why did scholars like Gedney and Li prefer 'Siamese' over 'Thai' for the standard language of Thailand?: Scholars such as William J. Gedney and Li Fang-Kuei preferred the term 'Siamese' over 'Thai' for the standard language of Thailand. This preference aimed to mitigate potential confusion for English speakers between 'Thai' (referring to the national language) and 'Tai' (referring to the broader language family), particularly given the subtle phonetic distinctions.

What is Michel Ferlus's proposed etymon for the ethnonyms Tai/Thai?

Answer: *k(ə)ri:

Michel Ferlus proposed that the ethnonyms Tai/Thai originated from the etymon *k(ə)ri:, meaning 'human being'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Michel Ferlus's proposed etymology for the ethnonyms Tai/Thai?: Michel Ferlus posits that the ethnonyms Tai/Thai (or Tay/Thay) originated from the etymon *k(ə)ri:, meaning 'human being'. This evolution involved a series of phonetic transformations, including consonant shifts and diphthongization, culminating in forms such as *dajA in Proto-Southwestern Tai, and subsequently tʰajA2 in Siamese and Lao, or tajA2 in other Southwestern and Central Tai languages.

Historical Origins and Early Linguistic Evidence

Jerold A. Edmondson dated the split between Zhuang and Southwestern Tai languages to the 19th century, based on the adoption of family names by the Thai.

Answer: False

Jerold A. Edmondson dated the split between Zhuang and Southwestern Tai languages to between 112 BCE and the 5th–6th century AD, citing the shared exonym for Vietnamese and the differing timelines for adopting family names.

Related Concepts:

  • What evidence did Jerold A. Edmondson use to date the split between Zhuang and Southwestern Tai languages?: Jerold A. Edmondson presented two lines of evidence: first, the shared exonym kəʔuA1 for Vietnamese among both Zhuang and Thai peoples, derived from Jiaozhi in Vietnam; and second, the observation that indigenous Bai Yue received family names from northern rulers during the Northern and Southern dynasties, while the Thai adopted family names only in the 19th century. Based on these, he proposed the split occurred between 112 BCE and the 5th–6th century AD.

Pittayawat Pittayaporn (2014) suggests the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages began between the 8th and 10th centuries AD, based on Chinese loanwords.

Answer: True

Pittayawat Pittayaporn (2014) indeed proposed that the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages commenced between the 8th and 10th centuries AD, a conclusion supported by the analysis of Chinese loanwords.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages likely begin, according to Pittayawat Pittayaporn?: Drawing on layers of Chinese loanwords identified in Proto-Southwestern Tai and other historical data, Pittayawat Pittayaporn (2014) posits that the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages commenced between the 8th and 10th centuries AD.

Proto-Kra–Dai, the ancestral language of Tai languages, is hypothesized to have originated in the Lower Yangtze valleys of present-day China.

Answer: True

The hypothesized origin of Proto-Kra–Dai, the ancestral language of the Tai family, is indeed the Lower Yangtze valleys in modern-day China.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the hypothesized origin of Proto-Kra–Dai, the ancestral language of Tai languages?: Proto-Kra–Dai, the reconstructed ancestral language from which the Tai languages descend, is hypothesized to have originated in the Lower Yangtze valleys of present-day China.

Ancient Chinese texts referred to all non-Sinitic languages spoken in the Lower Yangtze valleys as 'Han'.

Answer: False

Ancient Chinese texts referred to non-Sinitic languages and their speakers in the Lower Yangtze valleys as 'Yue', not 'Han'.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ancient Chinese texts refer to non-Sinitic languages spoken in the Lower Yangtze valleys?: Ancient Chinese texts referred to the non-Sinitic languages and their speakers across the extensive Lower Yangtze valleys as 'Yue'.

The 'Song of the Yue Boatman' is a crucial direct record of non-Sinitic speech from pre-Qin and Han times, transcribed in 528 BC.

Answer: True

The 'Song of the Yue Boatman', transcribed in 528 BC, is considered a vital direct record of non-Sinitic speech from the pre-Qin and Han periods, offering insights into ancient South China languages.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Song of the Yue Boatman' in historical-comparative linguistics?: The 'Song of the Yue Boatman' (Yueren Ge 越人歌), phonetically transcribed in Chinese characters in 528 BC, represents one of the rare direct records of non-Sinitic speech from pre-Qin and Han periods. Its resemblance to modern Zhuang has been crucial for identifying the origins of languages spoken in ancient South China.

Zhengzhang Shangfang (1991) used modern Thai pronunciation to analyze the 'Song of the Yue Boatman', building on Wei Qingwen's work.

Answer: False

Zhengzhang Shangfang (1991) utilized 13th-century Thai orthography for the analysis of the 'Song of the Yue Boatman', not modern Thai pronunciation, because it preserved older linguistic features.

Related Concepts:

  • How did linguists Wei Qingwen and Zhengzhang Shangfang contribute to the decipherment of the 'Song of the Yue Boatman'?: In the early 1980s, Zhuang linguist Wei Qingwen analyzed the 'Song of the Yue Boatman' using reconstructed Old Chinese, noting a strong resemblance to modern Zhuang vocabulary. Subsequently, Zhengzhang Shangfang (1991) advanced this work by employing 13th-century Thai orthography for comparative analysis, recognizing its preservation of older linguistic features compared to modern pronunciation.

What was one piece of evidence Jerold A. Edmondson used to date the split between Zhuang and Southwestern Tai languages?

Answer: The shared exonym kəʔuA1 for Vietnamese among Zhuang and Thai peoples.

Jerold A. Edmondson cited the shared exonym kəʔuA1 for Vietnamese among Zhuang and Thai peoples as evidence for dating the split between Zhuang and Southwestern Tai languages.

Related Concepts:

  • What evidence did Jerold A. Edmondson use to date the split between Zhuang and Southwestern Tai languages?: Jerold A. Edmondson presented two lines of evidence: first, the shared exonym kəʔuA1 for Vietnamese among both Zhuang and Thai peoples, derived from Jiaozhi in Vietnam; and second, the observation that indigenous Bai Yue received family names from northern rulers during the Northern and Southern dynasties, while the Thai adopted family names only in the 19th century. Based on these, he proposed the split occurred between 112 BCE and the 5th–6th century AD.

When did Pittayawat Pittayaporn (2014) suggest the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages likely began?

Answer: Sometime between the 8th and 10th centuries AD

Pittayawat Pittayaporn (2014) suggested that the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages likely began between the 8th and 10th centuries AD, based on Chinese loanwords.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages likely begin, according to Pittayawat Pittayaporn?: Drawing on layers of Chinese loanwords identified in Proto-Southwestern Tai and other historical data, Pittayawat Pittayaporn (2014) posits that the dispersal of Southwestern Tai languages commenced between the 8th and 10th centuries AD.

Where is Proto-Kra–Dai, the ancestral language of Tai languages, hypothesized to have originated?

Answer: The Lower Yangtze valleys

Proto-Kra–Dai, the ancestral language of Tai languages, is hypothesized to have originated in the Lower Yangtze valleys of present-day China.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the hypothesized origin of Proto-Kra–Dai, the ancestral language of Tai languages?: Proto-Kra–Dai, the reconstructed ancestral language from which the Tai languages descend, is hypothesized to have originated in the Lower Yangtze valleys of present-day China.

What term did ancient Chinese texts use to refer to non-Sinitic languages and their speakers in the Lower Yangtze valleys?

Answer: Yue

Ancient Chinese texts referred to non-Sinitic languages and their speakers in the Lower Yangtze valleys as 'Yue'.

Related Concepts:

  • How did ancient Chinese texts refer to non-Sinitic languages spoken in the Lower Yangtze valleys?: Ancient Chinese texts referred to the non-Sinitic languages and their speakers across the extensive Lower Yangtze valleys as 'Yue'.

What makes the 'Song of the Yue Boatman' significant in historical-comparative linguistics?

Answer: It provides a direct record of non-Sinitic speech from pre-Qin and Han times.

The 'Song of the Yue Boatman' is significant because it offers one of the few direct records of non-Sinitic speech from the pre-Qin and Han periods.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Song of the Yue Boatman' in historical-comparative linguistics?: The 'Song of the Yue Boatman' (Yueren Ge 越人歌), phonetically transcribed in Chinese characters in 528 BC, represents one of the rare direct records of non-Sinitic speech from pre-Qin and Han periods. Its resemblance to modern Zhuang has been crucial for identifying the origins of languages spoken in ancient South China.

Which linguist used 13th-century Thai orthography for comparison when analyzing the 'Song of the Yue Boatman'?

Answer: Zhengzhang Shangfang

Zhengzhang Shangfang (1991) utilized 13th-century Thai orthography for comparative analysis in deciphering the 'Song of the Yue Boatman'.

Related Concepts:

  • How did linguists Wei Qingwen and Zhengzhang Shangfang contribute to the decipherment of the 'Song of the Yue Boatman'?: In the early 1980s, Zhuang linguist Wei Qingwen analyzed the 'Song of the Yue Boatman' using reconstructed Old Chinese, noting a strong resemblance to modern Zhuang vocabulary. Subsequently, Zhengzhang Shangfang (1991) advanced this work by employing 13th-century Thai orthography for comparative analysis, recognizing its preservation of older linguistic features compared to modern pronunciation.

Traditional Tai Language Classifications

André-Georges Haudricourt (1956) proposed a three-way distinction for Tai languages: Dioi, Tai proper, and Central Tai.

Answer: False

André-Georges Haudricourt (1956) proposed a two-way distinction for Tai languages: the 'Dioi group' and 'Tai proper', not a three-way distinction including Central Tai.

Related Concepts:

  • What was André-Georges Haudricourt's (1956) primary classification of Tai languages?: André-Georges Haudricourt (1956) proposed a bipartite distinction for Tai languages, categorizing them into the 'Dioi group' and 'Tai proper'.

Haudricourt identified the absence of aspirated stops and affricates as a characteristic of the Dioi group, which are common in Tai proper.

Answer: True

Haudricourt indeed noted the absence of aspirated stops and affricates as a distinguishing feature of the Dioi group, contrasting with their prevalence in Tai proper.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the key characteristics that Haudricourt identified for the Dioi group?: Haudricourt identified several distinctive features for the Dioi group, including an 'r-' sound corresponding to the lateral 'l-' found in other Tai languages, unique vowel system characteristics (e.g., different vowels for 'tail'), and the absence of aspirated stops and affricates, which are prevalent in Tai proper.

Li Fang-Kuei (1977) classified Tai languages into Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai, with Thai included in the Southwestern branch.

Answer: True

Li Fang-Kuei's (1977) classification established three sister branches: Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai, with Thai being a member of the Southwestern branch.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Li Fang-Kuei (1977) classify the Tai languages?: Li Fang-Kuei (1977) categorized the Tai languages into three sister branches: Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai (which includes Thai).

Li Fang-Kuei's Northern group corresponds to Haudricourt's Tai proper category.

Answer: False

Li Fang-Kuei's Northern group corresponds to Haudricourt's *Dioi group*, while Li's Central and Southwestern groups together correspond to Haudricourt's 'Tai proper' category.

Related Concepts:

  • How do Li Fang-Kuei's classification groups relate to Haudricourt's earlier distinctions?: Li Fang-Kuei's Northern group aligns with Haudricourt's Dioi group. Li's Central and Southwestern groups collectively correspond to Haudricourt's broader 'Tai proper' category. Notably, some languages Haudricourt listed under 'Tai proper,' such as Tho (Tày), Longzhou, and Nung, were reclassified by Li as 'Central Tai'.

Central Tai is widely considered a monophyletic group in Li Fang-Kuei's classification scheme.

Answer: False

A known issue with Li Fang-Kuei's classification is that Central Tai does not appear to be a monophyletic group.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a known issue with Li Fang-Kuei's classification of Central Tai?: Despite the widespread acceptance of Li Fang-Kuei's classification scheme, the Central Tai group does not appear to be monophyletic, implying it may not consist of a single ancestral language and all its direct descendants.

Gedney (1989) proposed that Northern Tai forms a distinct subgroup with Central Tai, separate from Southwestern Tai.

Answer: False

Gedney (1989) proposed that Central and Southwestern Tai form a distinct subgroup, with Northern Tai as a separate sister branch, which is the opposite of the statement.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Gedney's (1989) classification differ from Li Fang-Kuei's?: Gedney (1989) proposed that Central and Southwestern Tai constitute a distinct subgroup, with Northern Tai forming a separate sister branch. This top-level branching aligns with Haudricourt's (1956) earlier distinction.

Luo Yongxian (1997) introduced a 'Northwestern Tai' branch, including languages like Ahom and Shan, as coordinate to other Tai branches.

Answer: True

Luo Yongxian (1997) indeed introduced a 'Northwestern Tai' branch, which includes languages such as Ahom and Shan, and considered it coordinate to the other Tai branches.

Related Concepts:

  • Which languages are included in Luo Yongxian's Northwestern Tai branch?: Luo Yongxian's Northwestern Tai branch encompasses languages such as Ahom, Shan, Dehong Dai, and Khamti.
  • What new branch did Luo Yongxian (1997) introduce in his Tai language classification?: Luo Yongxian (1997) introduced a fourth coordinate branch, 'Northwestern Tai,' into the classification of Tai languages, alongside Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai.

André-Georges Haudricourt (1956) primarily divided Tai languages into which two groups?

Answer: Dioi group and Tai proper

André-Georges Haudricourt (1956) primarily divided Tai languages into the 'Dioi group' and 'Tai proper'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was André-Georges Haudricourt's (1956) primary classification of Tai languages?: André-Georges Haudricourt (1956) proposed a bipartite distinction for Tai languages, categorizing them into the 'Dioi group' and 'Tai proper'.

Which characteristic did Haudricourt identify for the Dioi group?

Answer: A divergent vowel system.

Haudricourt identified a divergent vowel system as a key characteristic of the Dioi group, among other features like an 'r-' sound corresponding to 'l-' in other Tai languages and the absence of aspirated stops and affricates.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the key characteristics that Haudricourt identified for the Dioi group?: Haudricourt identified several distinctive features for the Dioi group, including an 'r-' sound corresponding to the lateral 'l-' found in other Tai languages, unique vowel system characteristics (e.g., different vowels for 'tail'), and the absence of aspirated stops and affricates, which are prevalent in Tai proper.

Which of the following languages was NOT included in Haudricourt's 'Dioi group'?

Answer: Shan

Haudricourt's 'Dioi group' included Yei Zhuang, Yongbei Zhuang, Youjiang Zhuang, and Bouyei (Buyi). Shan was classified under his 'Tai proper' group.

Related Concepts:

  • Which languages did Haudricourt include in his 'Dioi group' and 'Tai proper' classifications?: Haudricourt's Dioi group comprised Yei Zhuang, Yongbei Zhuang, Youjiang Zhuang, and Bouyei (Buyi). His Tai proper group encompassed Ahom, Shan, Siamese (Thai), Lao, White Tai (Tai Dón), Black Tai (Tai Dam), Southern Zhuang, Tho (Tày), and Nung.

How did Li Fang-Kuei (1977) classify the Tai languages?

Answer: Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai

Li Fang-Kuei (1977) classified the Tai languages into three sister branches: Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Li Fang-Kuei (1977) classify the Tai languages?: Li Fang-Kuei (1977) categorized the Tai languages into three sister branches: Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai (which includes Thai).

What is a known issue with Li Fang-Kuei's classification of Central Tai?

Answer: It does not appear to be a monophyletic group.

A known issue with Li Fang-Kuei's classification is that the Central Tai group does not appear to be monophyletic.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a known issue with Li Fang-Kuei's classification of Central Tai?: Despite the widespread acceptance of Li Fang-Kuei's classification scheme, the Central Tai group does not appear to be monophyletic, implying it may not consist of a single ancestral language and all its direct descendants.

Which new branch did Luo Yongxian (1997) introduce into the classification of Tai languages?

Answer: Northwestern Tai

Luo Yongxian (1997) introduced a fourth branch, 'Northwestern Tai', into the classification of Tai languages.

Related Concepts:

  • What new branch did Luo Yongxian (1997) introduce in his Tai language classification?: Luo Yongxian (1997) introduced a fourth coordinate branch, 'Northwestern Tai,' into the classification of Tai languages, alongside Northern Tai, Central Tai, and Southwestern Tai.

Which of the following languages is included in Luo Yongxian's Northwestern Tai branch?

Answer: Ahom

Luo Yongxian's Northwestern Tai branch includes languages such as Ahom, Shan, Dehong Dai, and Khamti.

Related Concepts:

  • Which languages are included in Luo Yongxian's Northwestern Tai branch?: Luo Yongxian's Northwestern Tai branch encompasses languages such as Ahom, Shan, Dehong Dai, and Khamti.

Phylogenetic and Phonological Analyses

Pittayawat Pittayaporn's (2009) classification is based on identifying shared innovations, and it considers Central Tai to be a monophyletic group.

Answer: False

While Pittayaporn's (2009) classification is based on shared innovations, it considers Central Tai to be *paraphyletic*, not monophyletic, and consequently splits it into multiple branches.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the basis of Pittayawat Pittayaporn's (2009) preliminary classification of Tai languages?: Pittayawat Pittayaporn's (2009) preliminary classification of Tai languages is predicated on identifying clusters of shared innovations, which are unique linguistic changes potentially associated with more than one branch.
  • How did Pittayaporn's (2009) classification address the Central Tai branch and Zhuang varieties?: In Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, Central Tai is considered paraphyletic and is consequently disaggregated into multiple branches. The Zhuang varieties of Chongzuo, particularly those situated in the Zuo River valley near the Vietnam border, exhibit the highest degree of internal diversity.

In Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, the Zhuang varieties of Chongzuo are noted for having the least internal diversity.

Answer: False

Pittayaporn's (2009) classification notes that the Zhuang varieties of Chongzuo, particularly those in the Zuo River valley, exhibit the *most* internal diversity, not the least.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Pittayaporn's (2009) classification address the Central Tai branch and Zhuang varieties?: In Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, Central Tai is considered paraphyletic and is consequently disaggregated into multiple branches. The Zhuang varieties of Chongzuo, particularly those situated in the Zuo River valley near the Vietnam border, exhibit the highest degree of internal diversity.

According to Pittayaporn (2009), Proto-Tai *uj, *uw became *aj, *aw in Subgroup N, but *iː, *uː in Subgroups Q and B.

Answer: True

Pittayaporn's (2009) analysis of Proto-Tai reflexes shows that *uj, *uw evolved into *aj, *aw in Subgroup N, but into *iː, *uː in Subgroups Q and B.

Related Concepts:

  • What phonological shifts are observed in Proto-Tai reflexes across subgroups Q, N, B, and C, according to Pittayaporn (2009)?: According to Pittayaporn (2009), Proto-Tai reflexes demonstrate specific phonological shifts: *ɯj, *ɯw, *ɯɤ became *aj, *aw, *aɤ in Subgroup Q, but *i:, *u:, *ɤ: in Subgroups N and B. Similarly, *uj, *uw became *iː, *uː in Q and B, but *aj, *aw in N. Proto-Tai *we, *wo became *eː, *oː in Q, B, and C, but *iː, *uː in N. Other shifts include *ʔm̥.r- to *br- in Q and *ʔr- in N and C, and *k.t- to *tr- in N and C.

At node E in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, the sound change *k.r- becoming *qr- was observed.

Answer: False

At node E, the sound changes observed were *p.t- becoming *p.r- and *ʔm̥ changing to *ʔm. The change *k.r- becoming *qr- occurred at node G.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific sound changes occurred at node E in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification?: At node E, the sound changes observed were *p.t- becoming *p.r- and *ʔm̥ changing to *ʔm.
  • What specific sound changes occurred at node G in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification?: At node G, the sound change observed was *k.r- becoming *qr-.

Jerold A. Edmondson's (2013) classification of Tai languages utilized computational phylogenetic analysis to infer evolutionary relationships.

Answer: True

Jerold A. Edmondson's (2013) classification of Tai languages was indeed based on computational phylogenetic analysis, a method for inferring evolutionary relationships.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the methodology used in Jerold A. Edmondson's (2013) classification of Tai languages?: Jerold A. Edmondson's (2013) classification of Tai languages employed computational phylogenetic analysis, a method that utilizes computational algorithms to infer evolutionary relationships among languages.

Edmondson's (2013) phylogenetic analysis concluded that Central Tai is a coherent, monophyletic branch.

Answer: False

Edmondson's (2013) phylogenetic analysis showed that Northern Tai, Southwestern Tai, Tay, and Nung are coherent branches, but it did not conclude that Central Tai is a coherent, monophyletic branch.

Related Concepts:

  • Which branches were shown to be coherent in Edmondson's (2013) phylogenetic analysis?: Edmondson's (2013) phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that Northern Tai, Southwestern Tai, Tay, and Nung constitute coherent branches within the Tai language family.

Buyi, Yay, Po-Ai, Wuming Zhuang, and Mashan Zhuang were included in Edmondson's (2013) Northern Tai branch.

Answer: True

Edmondson's (2013) Northern Tai branch indeed included Buyi, Yay, Po-Ai, Wuming Zhuang, and Mashan Zhuang.

Related Concepts:

  • Which languages did Edmondson (2013) include in his Northern Tai branch?: Edmondson's (2013) Northern Tai branch encompassed Buyi, Yay, Po-Ai, Wuming Zhuang, and Mashan Zhuang.

What was the primary basis of Pittayawat Pittayaporn's (2009) preliminary classification of Tai languages?

Answer: Identifying clusters of shared innovations.

Pittayawat Pittayaporn's (2009) preliminary classification of Tai languages was primarily based on identifying clusters of shared innovations.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the basis of Pittayawat Pittayaporn's (2009) preliminary classification of Tai languages?: Pittayawat Pittayaporn's (2009) preliminary classification of Tai languages is predicated on identifying clusters of shared innovations, which are unique linguistic changes potentially associated with more than one branch.

In Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, which Tai branches remained intact, consistent with Li Fang-Kuei's 1977 system?

Answer: Southwestern Tai and Northern Tai

In Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, the Southwestern Tai and Northern Tai branches remained intact, consistent with Li Fang-Kuei's 1977 system.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Tai branches remained intact in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, similar to Li Fang-Kuei's 1977 system?: In Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, the Southwestern Tai and Northern Tai branches retained their integrity, consistent with Li Fang-Kuei's 1977 classification system.

According to Pittayaporn (2009), what happened to Proto-Tai *we, *wo in Subgroup N?

Answer: They became *iː, *uː.

According to Pittayaporn (2009), Proto-Tai *we, *wo became *iː, *uː in Subgroup N.

Related Concepts:

  • What phonological shifts are observed in Proto-Tai reflexes across subgroups Q, N, B, and C, according to Pittayaporn (2009)?: According to Pittayaporn (2009), Proto-Tai reflexes demonstrate specific phonological shifts: *ɯj, *ɯw, *ɯɤ became *aj, *aw, *aɤ in Subgroup Q, but *i:, *u:, *ɤ: in Subgroups N and B. Similarly, *uj, *uw became *iː, *uː in Q and B, but *aj, *aw in N. Proto-Tai *we, *wo became *eː, *oː in Q, B, and C, but *iː, *uː in N. Other shifts include *ʔm̥.r- to *br- in Q and *ʔr- in N and C, and *k.t- to *tr- in N and C.

What specific sound changes occurred at node E in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification?

Answer: *p.t- becoming *p.r- and *ʔm̥ changing to *ʔm

At node E in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, the sound changes observed were *p.t- becoming *p.r- and *ʔm̥ changing to *ʔm.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific sound changes occurred at node E in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification?: At node E, the sound changes observed were *p.t- becoming *p.r- and *ʔm̥ changing to *ʔm.

What methodology did Jerold A. Edmondson (2013) use for his Tai language classification?

Answer: Computational phylogenetic analysis.

Jerold A. Edmondson (2013) employed computational phylogenetic analysis as the methodology for his Tai language classification.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the methodology used in Jerold A. Edmondson's (2013) classification of Tai languages?: Jerold A. Edmondson's (2013) classification of Tai languages employed computational phylogenetic analysis, a method that utilizes computational algorithms to infer evolutionary relationships among languages.

Which languages did Edmondson (2013) classify under the core Central Tai subgroup?

Answer: Nung Chau, Pingxiang Zhuang, Leiping Zhuang, Ningming Zhuang

Edmondson (2013) classified Nung Chau, Pingxiang Zhuang, Leiping Zhuang, and Ningming Zhuang under the core Central Tai subgroup.

Related Concepts:

  • Which languages did Edmondson (2013) classify under the core Central Tai subgroup?: Under the core Central Tai subgroup, Edmondson (2013) classified Nung Chau, Pingxiang Zhuang, Leiping Zhuang, and Ningming Zhuang.

What specific sound changes occurred at node K in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification?

Answer: *eː, *oː becoming *ɛː, *ɔː

At node K in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification, the sound changes observed were *eː, *oː becoming *ɛː, *ɔː.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific sound changes occurred at node K in Pittayaporn's (2009) classification?: At node K, the sound changes observed were *eː, *oː becoming *ɛː, *ɔː.

Which languages did Edmondson (2013) include in his Northern Tai branch?

Answer: Buyi, Yay, Po-Ai, Wuming Zhuang, and Mashan Zhuang

Edmondson (2013) included Buyi, Yay, Po-Ai, Wuming Zhuang, and Mashan Zhuang in his Northern Tai branch.

Related Concepts:

  • Which languages did Edmondson (2013) include in his Northern Tai branch?: Edmondson's (2013) Northern Tai branch encompassed Buyi, Yay, Po-Ai, Wuming Zhuang, and Mashan Zhuang.

Writing Systems and Comparative Lexicon

Many Southwestern Tai languages use writing systems derived from the Brahmi script.

Answer: True

Many Southwestern Tai languages indeed employ writing systems that trace their origins to the ancient Indian Brahmi script.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the common writing systems used for Southwestern Tai languages?: Many Southwestern Tai languages utilize alphabets that are derived from the Brahmi script, an ancient Indian writing system.

Zhuang languages are exclusively written using a romanized alphabet, having completely abandoned the traditional Sawndip.

Answer: False

While a romanized alphabet is officially used for Zhuang languages, the traditional Sawndip writing system, based on Chinese characters, remains in use today.

Related Concepts:

  • How are Zhuang languages traditionally and officially written?: Zhuang languages are traditionally written using Chinese characters known as Sawndip. While a romanized alphabet is now officially employed, the traditional Sawndip writing system remains in use today.

The Proto-Tai word for 'wind' is reconstructed as *dluom, which evolved into /lɔm/ in Thai and /lɔ́m/ in Lao.

Answer: True

The Proto-Tai word for 'wind' is reconstructed as *dluom, and its reflexes in Thai and Lao are indeed /lɔm/ and /lɔ́m/ respectively.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the word for 'wind' compare across various Tai languages?: The Proto-Tai word for 'wind' is reconstructed as *dluom. This has evolved into /lɔm/ in Thai, /lɔ́m/ in Lao, /lɔm/ in Northern Thai, /lɔ́m/ in Shan, /lôːm/ in Tai Lü, /ɣum˧˥/ in Standard Zhuang, and 'lum' in Ahom.

The Proto-Tai word for 'earth' is reconstructed as *ʔdin, which evolved into /din/ in Thai and /dìn/ in Lao.

Answer: True

The Proto-Tai word for 'earth' is reconstructed as *ʔdin, and its reflexes in Thai and Lao are indeed /din/ and /dìn/ respectively.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the word for 'earth' compare across various Tai languages?: The Proto-Tai word for 'earth' is reconstructed as *ʔdin. This has evolved into /din/ in Thai, /dìn/ in Lao, /din/ in Northern Thai, /lìn/ in Shan, /dín/ in Tai Lü, /dei˧/ in Standard Zhuang, and 'nin' in Ahom.

The Proto-Tai word for 'fire' is reconstructed as *wɯjA, which evolved into /faːj/ in Thai and /fáːj/ in Lao.

Answer: False

While the Proto-Tai word for 'fire' is reconstructed as *wɯjA and evolved into /faːj/ in Thai and /fáːj/ in Lao, the statement is incomplete as the flashcard indicates it also evolved into distinct forms in Northern Thai, Shan, Tai Lü, Standard Zhuang, and Ahom.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the word for 'fire' compare across various Tai languages?: The Proto-Tai word for 'fire' is reconstructed as *wɯjA. This has evolved into /faːj/ in Thai, /fáːj/ in Lao, /faːj/ in Northern Thai, /pʰáːj/ or /fáːj/ in Shan, /fâːj/ in Tai Lü, /fei˧˥/ in Standard Zhuang, and 'phai' in Ahom.

From which ancient writing system are many Southwestern Tai languages' alphabets derived?

Answer: Brahmi script

Many Southwestern Tai languages utilize alphabets derived from the ancient Indian Brahmi script.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the common writing systems used for Southwestern Tai languages?: Many Southwestern Tai languages utilize alphabets that are derived from the Brahmi script, an ancient Indian writing system.

What is the traditional writing system for Zhuang languages?

Answer: Sawndip

The traditional writing system for Zhuang languages is Sawndip, which uses Chinese characters.

Related Concepts:

  • How are Zhuang languages traditionally and officially written?: Zhuang languages are traditionally written using Chinese characters known as Sawndip. While a romanized alphabet is now officially employed, the traditional Sawndip writing system remains in use today.

What is the Proto-Tai word reconstructed for 'water'?

Answer: *C.namC

The Proto-Tai word reconstructed for 'water' is *C.namC.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the word for 'water' compare across various Tai languages?: The Proto-Tai word for 'water' is reconstructed as *C.namC. This has evolved into /náːm/ in Thai, /nâːm/ in Lao, /náːm/ in Northern Thai, /nâːm/ in Shan, /naːm/ in Tai Lü, /ɣaem˧˨/ in Standard Zhuang, and 'nam' in Ahom.

How does the Proto-Tai word for 'heart' (*cɯʔA) typically appear in Standard Zhuang?

Answer: /sim/

The Proto-Tai word for 'heart' (*cɯʔA) typically appears as /sim/ in Standard Zhuang.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the word for 'heart' compare across various Tai languages?: The Proto-Tai word for 'heart' is reconstructed as *cɯʔA. This has evolved into /hǔa tɕaːj/ in Thai, /hǔa tɕàːj/ in Lao, /hǔa tɕɔj/ in Northern Thai, /hɔ̀ tɕɤ/ in Shan, /hɔ́ tɕaːj/ in Tai Lü, /sim/ in Standard Zhuang, and 'chau' in Ahom.

Which of the following is NOT a specific writing system mentioned for Tai languages?

Answer: Devanagari script

Specific writing systems mentioned for Tai languages include Thai script, Lao script, and Shan script. Devanagari script is an Indic script but not specifically listed as a Tai writing system in the provided text.

Related Concepts:

  • Can you list some of the specific writing systems used for Tai languages?: Specific writing systems employed for Tai languages include Thai script, Lao script, Sawndip, Shan script, Ahom script, Tai Viet script, Tai Le script, New Tai Lue alphabet, and Tai Tham script.

The Proto-Tai word for 'town' is reconstructed as *mɯəŋA. How does this compare to its form in Shan?

Answer: /mɔ́ŋ/

The Proto-Tai word for 'town' (*mɯəŋA) evolved into /mɔ́ŋ/ in Shan.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the word for 'town' compare across various Tai languages?: The Proto-Tai word for 'town' is reconstructed as *mɯəŋA. This has evolved into /mɯ̄aŋ/ in Thai, /mɯ́ːaŋ/ in Lao, /mɯ̄aŋ/ in Northern Thai, /mɔ́ŋ/ in Shan, /mɔ̂ŋ/ in Tai Lü, /mɯŋ˧/ in Standard Zhuang, and 'mvng' in Ahom.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy