Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



Anthropological Concepts: The Term 'Tribe'

At a Glance

Title: Anthropological Concepts: The Term 'Tribe'

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Conceptualizing the Tribe: 15 flashcards, 19 questions
  • Etymology and Historical Context: 3 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Critiques and Revisions of the Term: 3 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Tribalism in Societal Development: 5 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Contemporary Tribes and Identity: 14 flashcards, 20 questions
  • Associated Sociopolitical Structures: 14 flashcards, 15 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 54
  • True/False Questions: 41
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 29
  • Total Questions: 70

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Anthropological Concepts: The Term 'Tribe'

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Tribe" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Anthropological Concepts: The Term 'Tribe'

Study Guide: Anthropological Concepts: The Term 'Tribe'

Conceptualizing the Tribe

Sociology is the primary discipline that utilizes the term 'tribe' for categorizing human social groups.

Answer: False

The primary discipline that utilizes the term 'tribe' for categorizing human social groups is anthropology, not sociology.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.
  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.
  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.

Within anthropological classification, a tribe is generally considered larger than a chiefdom but smaller than a lineage.

Answer: False

In anthropological classification, a tribe is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan but smaller than a chiefdom, contrary to the statement.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.
  • What is the definition of a tribe as a political unit, according to the text?: A tribe is defined as a political unit formed from an organization of families, which can include clans and lineages. This organization is based on social or ideological solidarity among its members.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.

Elman Service's classification system categorizes societies into five main types, including bands, tribes, chiefdoms, civilizations, and empires.

Answer: False

Elman Service's classification primarily categorizes societies into four main types: bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and civilizations, not typically including empires as a distinct fifth category in the initial formulation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Elman Service's contribution to the classification of societies in anthropology?: Anthropologist Elman Service proposed a system of classification for societies across all human cultures, focusing on the evolution of social inequality and the role of the state. His system categorizes societies into four main types: hunter-gatherer bands, tribal societies with limited rank, stratified tribal societies led by chieftains (chiefdoms), and civilizations with complex hierarchies and governments.
  • How does Service's classification define tribal societies?: In Elman Service's classification, tribal societies are characterized by having some limited instances of social rank and prestige. This places them above egalitarian bands but below more stratified societies like chiefdoms.
  • Based on Elman Service's classification, what are the characteristics of the first category of societies?: The first category in Elman Service's classification consists of hunter-gatherer bands. These societies are generally described as egalitarian, meaning they typically lack significant social hierarchy or stratification.

Hunter-gatherer bands, according to Elman Service's classification, are typically described as egalitarian.

Answer: True

Hunter-gatherer bands, as categorized by Elman Service, are generally described as egalitarian societies, lacking significant social hierarchy.

Related Concepts:

  • Based on Elman Service's classification, what are the characteristics of the first category of societies?: The first category in Elman Service's classification consists of hunter-gatherer bands. These societies are generally described as egalitarian, meaning they typically lack significant social hierarchy or stratification.
  • How does Service's classification define tribal societies?: In Elman Service's classification, tribal societies are characterized by having some limited instances of social rank and prestige. This places them above egalitarian bands but below more stratified societies like chiefdoms.
  • What is Elman Service's contribution to the classification of societies in anthropology?: Anthropologist Elman Service proposed a system of classification for societies across all human cultures, focusing on the evolution of social inequality and the role of the state. His system categorizes societies into four main types: hunter-gatherer bands, tribal societies with limited rank, stratified tribal societies led by chieftains (chiefdoms), and civilizations with complex hierarchies and governments.

Morton Fried's studies found that tribes consistently exhibit homogenous populations and share singular, undisputed leaders.

Answer: False

Morton Fried's studies highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries and heterogeneity, challenging the notion of consistently homogenous populations and singular leaders.

Related Concepts:

  • What characteristics did Morton Fried identify in tribes that challenged the traditional concept?: Morton Fried's 1975 study, 'The Notion of the Tribe,' highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries, heterogeneity, and dynamism. He provided examples of tribes with members speaking different languages, practicing different rituals, or sharing leaders with other tribes, concluding they are not parochial entities.
  • According to Morton Fried, how might tribalism arise?: Morton Fried suggested that tribalism could arise as a reaction to the formation of complex political structures. He posited that bands might organize into tribes as a means to resist the violence and exploitation often associated with early kingdoms and states.

It is easy to apply a universal conceptual framework to the term 'tribe' due to the cultural uniformity among tribal societies.

Answer: False

It is difficult to apply a universal conceptual framework to the term 'tribe' because it attempts to encompass diverse cultures and peoples, leading to conflicting scholarly conclusions.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is it difficult to apply a universal conceptual framework to the term 'tribe'?: It is difficult to apply a universal conceptual framework to the term 'tribe' because it attempts to encompass diverse cultures and peoples. This diversity leads different anthropologists to draw conflicting conclusions about the nature, structure, and practices of tribal societies.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.
  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.

A 'leveling mechanism' in tribal societies is designed to increase disparities in social status and wealth.

Answer: False

A 'leveling mechanism' in tribal societies refers to social or cultural practices that work to reduce or prevent significant disparities in social status or wealth, thereby maintaining a degree of egalitarianism.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'leveling mechanism' refer to in the context of social status within tribes?: A leveling mechanism, in the context of tribal societies, refers to social or cultural practices that work to reduce or prevent significant disparities in social status or wealth. These mechanisms help maintain a degree of egalitarianism, even within societies that might have some social ranking.

A 'big man' leader in anthropological terms gains influence primarily through inherited status.

Answer: False

A 'big man' leader in anthropological terms gains influence primarily through personal charisma, generosity, and resource mobilization, rather than through inherited status.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'big man' in anthropological terms, as mentioned in the text?: A 'big man' is a type of leader described in anthropological contexts, particularly in societies like those found in Papua New Guinea. These leaders often gain influence through personal charisma, generosity, and the ability to mobilize resources and followers, rather than through inherited status.

'Ethnicity' is never considered a factor contributing to tribal membership or definition.

Answer: False

Ethnicity, signifying a shared sense of identity based on common cultural, linguistic, or ancestral origins, is often considered a factor that can contribute to the formation and definition of a tribe.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'ethnicity' signify in relation to tribal groups?: Ethnicity, in the context of tribal groups, refers to a shared sense of identity based on common cultural, linguistic, ancestral, or national origins. It is one of the factors that can contribute to the formation and definition of a tribe.
  • What factors can contribute to tribal membership?: Membership in a tribe can be based on a variety of factors, including kinship (like belonging to a clan), ethnicity or perceived race, language, shared dwelling place, political affiliation, religious beliefs, oral traditions, and cultural practices.

'Tribalism' can refer to a strong sense of loyalty and adherence to one's tribe or ethnic group.

Answer: True

'Tribalism' refers to the state of being organized into or characterized by tribes, and can also describe a strong sense of loyalty and adherence to one's tribe or ethnic group.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'tribalism' as a concept in social science?: Tribalism refers to the state of being organized into or characterized by tribes. In social science, it can also describe a strong sense of loyalty and adherence to one's tribe or ethnic group, sometimes contrasted with broader national or political identities.
  • What is 'neotribalism'?: Neotribalism is a concept that describes the resurgence or formation of tribal-like social structures or identities in modern or postmodern societies. It suggests a return to smaller, more localized, and identity-based group affiliations.
  • What is the definition of a tribe as a political unit, according to the text?: A tribe is defined as a political unit formed from an organization of families, which can include clans and lineages. This organization is based on social or ideological solidarity among its members.

A 'tribal chief's' roles and powers are universally consistent across all tribal structures.

Answer: False

A 'tribal chief's' roles and powers are not universally consistent, varying significantly depending on the particular tribal structure and cultural context.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'tribal chief'?: A tribal chief is an individual who holds a leadership position within a tribe. The specific roles, powers, and legitimacy of a tribal chief can vary significantly depending on the particular tribal structure and cultural context.

What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?

Answer: Anthropology

The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology, where it refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.
  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.
  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.

In anthropological classification, how is a 'tribe' typically contrasted in size with other social groups?

Answer: Larger than a lineage but smaller than a chiefdom

In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.
  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.

Which anthropologist proposed a classification system categorizing societies into bands, tribal societies, chiefdoms, and civilizations?

Answer: Elman Service

Anthropologist Elman Service proposed a system of classification for societies across all human cultures, focusing on the evolution of social inequality and the role of the state, categorizing them into bands, tribal societies, chiefdoms, and civilizations.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Elman Service's contribution to the classification of societies in anthropology?: Anthropologist Elman Service proposed a system of classification for societies across all human cultures, focusing on the evolution of social inequality and the role of the state. His system categorizes societies into four main types: hunter-gatherer bands, tribal societies with limited rank, stratified tribal societies led by chieftains (chiefdoms), and civilizations with complex hierarchies and governments.

Morton Fried's 1975 study highlighted which characteristic of tribes that challenged traditional concepts?

Answer: Fluid boundaries and heterogeneity

Morton Fried's study highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries and heterogeneity, challenging traditional concepts that viewed them as rigid, parochial entities.

Related Concepts:

  • What characteristics did Morton Fried identify in tribes that challenged the traditional concept?: Morton Fried's 1975 study, 'The Notion of the Tribe,' highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries, heterogeneity, and dynamism. He provided examples of tribes with members speaking different languages, practicing different rituals, or sharing leaders with other tribes, concluding they are not parochial entities.
  • According to Morton Fried, how might tribalism arise?: Morton Fried suggested that tribalism could arise as a reaction to the formation of complex political structures. He posited that bands might organize into tribes as a means to resist the violence and exploitation often associated with early kingdoms and states.
  • What are 'secondary' tribes according to Morton Fried's theory?: 'Secondary' tribes, as proposed by Morton Fried, are not direct descendants of pre-state tribes but rather developed from pre-state bands. They are seen as modern products of state expansion, often formed to serve the interests of expanding states or to defend against them.

In the context of tribal societies, what is a 'leveling mechanism'?

Answer: A practice that reduces or prevents significant disparities in social status or wealth

A leveling mechanism, in the context of tribal societies, refers to social or cultural practices that work to reduce or prevent significant disparities in social status or wealth, helping to maintain a degree of egalitarianism.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'leveling mechanism' refer to in the context of social status within tribes?: A leveling mechanism, in the context of tribal societies, refers to social or cultural practices that work to reduce or prevent significant disparities in social status or wealth. These mechanisms help maintain a degree of egalitarianism, even within societies that might have some social ranking.

What is the basis of leadership for a 'big man' in anthropological terms?

Answer: Personal charisma, generosity, and resource mobilization

A 'big man' is a type of leader described in anthropological contexts, particularly in societies like those found in Papua New Guinea. These leaders often gain influence through personal charisma, generosity, and the ability to mobilize resources and followers, rather than through inherited status.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'big man' in anthropological terms, as mentioned in the text?: A 'big man' is a type of leader described in anthropological contexts, particularly in societies like those found in Papua New Guinea. These leaders often gain influence through personal charisma, generosity, and the ability to mobilize resources and followers, rather than through inherited status.

What distinguishes 'ritual warfare' from other forms of conflict?

Answer: It involves specific ceremonies, rules, or symbolic meanings

Ritual warfare refers to conflicts between groups that are conducted with specific ceremonies, rules, or symbolic meanings, often distinct from warfare aimed solely at territorial conquest or resource acquisition.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'ritual warfare' as it relates to tribal societies?: Ritual warfare refers to conflicts between groups that are conducted with specific ceremonies, rules, or symbolic meanings, often distinct from warfare aimed solely at territorial conquest or resource acquisition. It can serve social or political functions within tribal contexts.

What is the significance of 'ethnicity' in relation to tribal groups?

Answer: It is a factor that can contribute to the formation and definition of a tribe

Ethnicity, in the context of tribal groups, refers to a shared sense of identity based on common cultural, linguistic, ancestral, or national origins, and it is one of the factors that can contribute to the formation and definition of a tribe.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'ethnicity' signify in relation to tribal groups?: Ethnicity, in the context of tribal groups, refers to a shared sense of identity based on common cultural, linguistic, ancestral, or national origins. It is one of the factors that can contribute to the formation and definition of a tribe.
  • What is 'tribalism' as a concept in social science?: Tribalism refers to the state of being organized into or characterized by tribes. In social science, it can also describe a strong sense of loyalty and adherence to one's tribe or ethnic group, sometimes contrasted with broader national or political identities.
  • What factors can contribute to tribal membership?: Membership in a tribe can be based on a variety of factors, including kinship (like belonging to a clan), ethnicity or perceived race, language, shared dwelling place, political affiliation, religious beliefs, oral traditions, and cultural practices.

Etymology and Historical Context

The modern English word 'tribe' derives directly from the Latin word 'tribus', bypassing Middle English.

Answer: False

The modern English word 'tribe' derives from Latin 'tribus' via Middle English, not directly from Latin bypassing Middle English.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the origin of the English word 'tribe'?: The modern English word 'tribe' originates from Middle English 'tribu,' which itself derives from the Latin word 'tribus.' The Latin term is believed to stem from a Proto-Indo-European compound meaning 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.'
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.

The Latin word 'tribus' is believed to derive from a Proto-Indo-European compound signifying 'three lands'.

Answer: False

The Latin word 'tribus' is believed to derive from a Proto-Indo-European compound *'tri-dṽh₁u/o-', which signifies 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division,' not 'three lands'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the etymological connection between the Latin 'tribus' and Proto-Indo-European?: The Latin word 'tribus' is believed to derive from the Proto-Indo-European compound *'tri-dṽh₁u/o-', which signifies 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.' This suggests an ancient concept related to division or organization.
  • What is the origin of the English word 'tribe'?: The modern English word 'tribe' originates from Middle English 'tribu,' which itself derives from the Latin word 'tribus.' The Latin term is believed to stem from a Proto-Indo-European compound meaning 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.'

What is the origin of the English word 'tribe'?

Answer: Latin

The modern English word 'tribe' originates from Middle English 'tribu,' which itself derives from the Latin word 'tribus.' The Latin term is believed to stem from a Proto-Indo-European compound meaning 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.'

Related Concepts:

  • What is the origin of the English word 'tribe'?: The modern English word 'tribe' originates from Middle English 'tribu,' which itself derives from the Latin word 'tribus.' The Latin term is believed to stem from a Proto-Indo-European compound meaning 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.'
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.
  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.

What is the etymological connection between the Latin 'tribus' and Proto-Indo-European?

Answer: 'Rendered in three' or 'tripartite division'

The Latin word 'tribus' is believed to derive from the Proto-Indo-European compound *'tri-dṽh₁u/o-', which signifies 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division,' suggesting an ancient concept related to division or organization.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the etymological connection between the Latin 'tribus' and Proto-Indo-European?: The Latin word 'tribus' is believed to derive from the Proto-Indo-European compound *'tri-dṽh₁u/o-', which signifies 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.' This suggests an ancient concept related to division or organization.
  • What is the origin of the English word 'tribe'?: The modern English word 'tribe' originates from Middle English 'tribu,' which itself derives from the Latin word 'tribus.' The Latin term is believed to stem from a Proto-Indo-European compound meaning 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.'
  • According to the Oxford English Dictionary, what are the possible origins of the Latin word 'tribus'?: The Oxford English Dictionary suggests that the Latin word 'tribus' may have originated either from borrowing from a Romance language like Old French 'tribu,' or directly from Latin itself. The Middle English plural 'tribuz' (circa 1250) might represent a direct borrowing from the Latin plural 'tribus.'

Critiques and Revisions of the Term

The term 'tribe' began facing significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology around the 1990s.

Answer: False

The term 'tribe' began facing significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology from the late 1950s and 1960s, not around the 1990s.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.
  • What negative connotations has the term 'tribe' acquired?: The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations, similar to the word 'Indian,' that are associated with colonialism. This has contributed to its reduced usage in some academic circles.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.

J. Clyde Mitchell attributed doubts about the term 'tribe' primarily to the lack of archaeological evidence.

Answer: False

J. Clyde Mitchell attributed doubts about the term 'tribe' to inconsistent definitions among scholars and increased global involvement with industrial nations, not solely to a lack of archaeological evidence.

Related Concepts:

  • What did J. Clyde Mitchell state about the scrutiny of the term 'tribe' in anthropology?: J. Clyde Mitchell noted in 1970 that the tribe, once a respected analytical category, had recently come under scrutiny. He attributed these doubts to the increasing involvement of peoples worldwide in political, economic, and social relationships with industrial nations, and to differing scholarly definitions of the term.
  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.

Anthropologist Martin van Bruinessen found that standard anthropological terms like 'tribe' perfectly described the social reality of Kurdistan.

Answer: False

Martin van Bruinessen found that standard anthropological terms like 'tribe' acted as a 'straitjacket' that did not fit the social reality of Kurdistan, illustrating the challenges of applying universal categories.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticism did Martin van Bruinessen offer regarding the application of anthropological terms to Kurdish society?: Anthropologist Martin van Bruinessen argued that standard anthropological terms like 'tribe,' 'clan,' and 'lineage' acted as a 'straitjacket' that did not fit the social reality of Kurdistan. This illustrates the challenges of applying universal categories to specific cultural contexts.

When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?

Answer: From the late 1950s and 1960s

The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.
  • What did J. Clyde Mitchell state about the scrutiny of the term 'tribe' in anthropology?: J. Clyde Mitchell noted in 1970 that the tribe, once a respected analytical category, had recently come under scrutiny. He attributed these doubts to the increasing involvement of peoples worldwide in political, economic, and social relationships with industrial nations, and to differing scholarly definitions of the term.
  • What negative connotations has the term 'tribe' acquired?: The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations, similar to the word 'Indian,' that are associated with colonialism. This has contributed to its reduced usage in some academic circles.

What did J. Clyde Mitchell attribute the doubts about the term 'tribe' to?

Answer: Inconsistent definitions among scholars and increased global involvement with industrial nations

J. Clyde Mitchell noted that doubts about the term 'tribe' arose from inconsistent definitions among scholars and the increasing involvement of peoples worldwide in political, economic, and social relationships with industrial nations.

Related Concepts:

  • What did J. Clyde Mitchell state about the scrutiny of the term 'tribe' in anthropology?: J. Clyde Mitchell noted in 1970 that the tribe, once a respected analytical category, had recently come under scrutiny. He attributed these doubts to the increasing involvement of peoples worldwide in political, economic, and social relationships with industrial nations, and to differing scholarly definitions of the term.
  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.

What criticism did Martin van Bruinessen offer regarding the application of anthropological terms to Kurdish society?

Answer: They acted as a 'straitjacket' that did not fit the social reality of Kurdistan

Anthropologist Martin van Bruinessen argued that standard anthropological terms like 'tribe' acted as a 'straitjacket' that did not fit the social reality of Kurdistan, illustrating the challenges of applying universal categories to specific cultural contexts.

Related Concepts:

  • What criticism did Martin van Bruinessen offer regarding the application of anthropological terms to Kurdish society?: Anthropologist Martin van Bruinessen argued that standard anthropological terms like 'tribe,' 'clan,' and 'lineage' acted as a 'straitjacket' that did not fit the social reality of Kurdistan. This illustrates the challenges of applying universal categories to specific cultural contexts.
  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.

Tribalism in Societal Development

Morton Fried argued that a tribal stage was an absolute necessity in the transition from a single settlement to a complex state-structured polity.

Answer: False

Morton Fried argued that a tribal stage was not an absolute necessity in the transition from a single settlement to a complex state, suggesting it could be a reaction to complex structures rather than a required preliminary step.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Morton Fried argue about the necessity of a tribal stage in societal evolution?: Morton Fried argued in 1967 that a tribal stage, as defined by scholars like Sahlins and Service, was not an absolute necessity in the transition from a single settlement to a complex state-structured polity. He suggested that tribalism could be a reaction to the formation of complex political structures.
  • According to Morton Fried, how might tribalism arise?: Morton Fried suggested that tribalism could arise as a reaction to the formation of complex political structures. He posited that bands might organize into tribes as a means to resist the violence and exploitation often associated with early kingdoms and states.
  • What characteristics did Morton Fried identify in tribes that challenged the traditional concept?: Morton Fried's 1975 study, 'The Notion of the Tribe,' highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries, heterogeneity, and dynamism. He provided examples of tribes with members speaking different languages, practicing different rituals, or sharing leaders with other tribes, concluding they are not parochial entities.

'Secondary' tribes, according to Morton Fried's theory, are direct descendants of pre-state tribes.

Answer: False

According to Morton Fried, 'secondary' tribes are modern products of state expansion, not direct descendants of pre-state tribes; they often developed from pre-state bands.

Related Concepts:

  • What are 'secondary' tribes according to Morton Fried's theory?: 'Secondary' tribes, as proposed by Morton Fried, are not direct descendants of pre-state tribes but rather developed from pre-state bands. They are seen as modern products of state expansion, often formed to serve the interests of expanding states or to defend against them.
  • According to Morton Fried, how might tribalism arise?: Morton Fried suggested that tribalism could arise as a reaction to the formation of complex political structures. He posited that bands might organize into tribes as a means to resist the violence and exploitation often associated with early kingdoms and states.
  • What characteristics did Morton Fried identify in tribes that challenged the traditional concept?: Morton Fried's 1975 study, 'The Notion of the Tribe,' highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries, heterogeneity, and dynamism. He provided examples of tribes with members speaking different languages, practicing different rituals, or sharing leaders with other tribes, concluding they are not parochial entities.

States may encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes to extend their administrative and economic influence.

Answer: True

States may encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes to extend their administrative and economic influence, often by requiring or encouraging centralized polities on their frontiers.

Related Concepts:

  • How might states encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes?: States may encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes to extend their administrative and economic influence into hinterlands where direct political control is costly. By requiring or encouraging people on their frontiers to form more centralized polities, states can facilitate the production of surpluses and taxes, and ensure leadership responsive to state needs.
  • How do bands form 'secondary' tribes as a defense against state expansion?: Bands can form 'secondary' tribes as a defensive strategy against state expansion by creating more clearly bounded and centralized polities. These new structures can generate surpluses to support a standing army for defense and establish leadership capable of coordinating economic and military activities.
  • What are 'secondary' tribes according to Morton Fried's theory?: 'Secondary' tribes, as proposed by Morton Fried, are not direct descendants of pre-state tribes but rather developed from pre-state bands. They are seen as modern products of state expansion, often formed to serve the interests of expanding states or to defend against them.

According to Morton Fried, how might tribalism arise in societal evolution?

Answer: As a reaction to the formation of complex political structures

Morton Fried suggested that tribalism could arise as a reaction to the formation of complex political structures, positing that bands might organize into tribes as a means to resist the violence and exploitation often associated with early kingdoms and states.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Morton Fried, how might tribalism arise?: Morton Fried suggested that tribalism could arise as a reaction to the formation of complex political structures. He posited that bands might organize into tribes as a means to resist the violence and exploitation often associated with early kingdoms and states.
  • What characteristics did Morton Fried identify in tribes that challenged the traditional concept?: Morton Fried's 1975 study, 'The Notion of the Tribe,' highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries, heterogeneity, and dynamism. He provided examples of tribes with members speaking different languages, practicing different rituals, or sharing leaders with other tribes, concluding they are not parochial entities.
  • What did Morton Fried argue about the necessity of a tribal stage in societal evolution?: Morton Fried argued in 1967 that a tribal stage, as defined by scholars like Sahlins and Service, was not an absolute necessity in the transition from a single settlement to a complex state-structured polity. He suggested that tribalism could be a reaction to the formation of complex political structures.

According to Morton Fried's theory, what are 'secondary' tribes?

Answer: Modern products of state expansion

'Secondary' tribes, as proposed by Morton Fried, are not direct descendants of pre-state tribes but rather modern products of state expansion, often formed to serve the interests of expanding states or to defend against them.

Related Concepts:

  • What are 'secondary' tribes according to Morton Fried's theory?: 'Secondary' tribes, as proposed by Morton Fried, are not direct descendants of pre-state tribes but rather developed from pre-state bands. They are seen as modern products of state expansion, often formed to serve the interests of expanding states or to defend against them.
  • What characteristics did Morton Fried identify in tribes that challenged the traditional concept?: Morton Fried's 1975 study, 'The Notion of the Tribe,' highlighted that tribes often exhibit fluid boundaries, heterogeneity, and dynamism. He provided examples of tribes with members speaking different languages, practicing different rituals, or sharing leaders with other tribes, concluding they are not parochial entities.
  • According to Morton Fried, how might tribalism arise?: Morton Fried suggested that tribalism could arise as a reaction to the formation of complex political structures. He posited that bands might organize into tribes as a means to resist the violence and exploitation often associated with early kingdoms and states.

How might states encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes?

Answer: By requiring or encouraging centralized polities on their frontiers

States may encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes by requiring or encouraging people on their frontiers to form more centralized polities, which can facilitate the production of surpluses and taxes, and ensure leadership responsive to state needs.

Related Concepts:

  • How might states encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes?: States may encourage the formation of 'secondary' tribes to extend their administrative and economic influence into hinterlands where direct political control is costly. By requiring or encouraging people on their frontiers to form more centralized polities, states can facilitate the production of surpluses and taxes, and ensure leadership responsive to state needs.
  • How do bands form 'secondary' tribes as a defense against state expansion?: Bands can form 'secondary' tribes as a defensive strategy against state expansion by creating more clearly bounded and centralized polities. These new structures can generate surpluses to support a standing army for defense and establish leadership capable of coordinating economic and military activities.
  • What are 'secondary' tribes according to Morton Fried's theory?: 'Secondary' tribes, as proposed by Morton Fried, are not direct descendants of pre-state tribes but rather developed from pre-state bands. They are seen as modern products of state expansion, often formed to serve the interests of expanding states or to defend against them.

Contemporary Tribes and Identity

The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations similar to the word 'nation'.

Answer: False

The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations similar to the word 'Indian,' often associated with colonialism, rather than 'nation'.

Related Concepts:

  • What negative connotations has the term 'tribe' acquired?: The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations, similar to the word 'Indian,' that are associated with colonialism. This has contributed to its reduced usage in some academic circles.
  • When did the term 'tribe' begin to face significant controversy and deprecation in anthropology?: The term 'tribe' was commonly used in anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s, after which it began to attract controversy and scholarly challenges regarding its utility as an analytical category.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.

Survival International distinguishes between 'tribal' and 'indigenous' peoples by stating that tribal peoples lack special status in international law.

Answer: False

Survival International distinguishes tribal peoples by their special status acknowledged in international law, not by a lack thereof.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Survival International distinguish between 'tribal' and 'indigenous' peoples?: Survival International emphasizes the distinction between 'tribal' and 'indigenous' peoples, noting that tribal peoples possess a special status acknowledged in international law. They also face unique problems in addition to those common to the broader category of indigenous peoples.

Most tribes today remain isolated from modern state systems.

Answer: False

Few tribes today remain isolated from modern state systems; many have lost their traditional functions to state institutions like taxation and law courts.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the general trend for tribes in relation to modern state systems?: Few tribes today remain isolated from modern state systems. Many have lost their traditional functions, such as collecting tithes, administering justice, and defending territory, as these roles have been taken over by state institutions like taxation, law courts, and the military. This has often led to a decline in cultural identity for many tribes.

Native American tribes in North America are considered sovereign nations.

Answer: True

Native American tribes in North America are considered sovereign nations, possessing inherent rights to self-governance and maintaining a government-to-government relationship with the federal government.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the status of Native American tribes in North America regarding sovereignty?: Native American tribes in North America are considered sovereign nations. They have either retained their sovereignty or been granted legal recognition by the federal government, which acknowledges their inherent right to self-governance.
  • What is the legal status of Native American tribes within the United States according to the provided text?: In the United States, Native American tribes are legally recognized as having 'domestic dependent nation' status. They maintain a government-to-government relationship with the federal government, signifying a degree of inherent sovereignty.
  • What is 'tribal sovereignty'?: Tribal sovereignty refers to the inherent right of a tribe to govern itself and its territory, independent of external governmental control. This concept is particularly relevant in the context of indigenous nations interacting with national governments.

Yemen is notable as the least tribal nation in the Arab world.

Answer: False

Yemen is notable as the most tribal nation in the Arab world, characterized by the significant influence of tribal leaders and their integration into the state.

Related Concepts:

  • What makes Yemen notable in the context of tribal structures in the Arab world?: Yemen is notable as the most tribal nation in the Arab world. This is largely due to the significant influence of tribal leaders and their deep integration into various aspects of the Yemeni state.
  • Approximately how many tribes are estimated to exist in Yemen?: Estimates for the number of tribes in Yemen vary, with approximately 200 tribes being commonly cited. However, some reports suggest there may be more than 400 tribes in the country.

The creation of 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST) in India was based on colonial administrative divisions unrelated to community needs.

Answer: False

The creation of 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST) in India was based on advocacy for special protections for certain communities, leading to lists of those deserving support, rather than solely on unrelated colonial administrative divisions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the context for the creation of 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST) in India?: India's Constituent Assembly debated special provisions for certain communities, referred to as 'Adibasi' or 'aboriginal.' Jaipal Singh, representing the Munda tribe, advocated for these provisions, leading to the creation of lists of communities deserving special protections, which became known as 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST).

George Catlin's 1834 painting depicts Comanche warriors attempting to lance an Osage warrior.

Answer: True

George Catlin's 1834 painting depicts Comanche warriors attempting to lance an Osage warrior during a tribal conflict on the plains.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the image caption describe regarding George Catlin's painting?: The image caption describes a painting by George Catlin from 1834 depicting a tribal war on the plains. It specifically shows Comanche warriors attempting to lance an Osage warrior.

Pashtuns are described as constituting the world's smallest tribal society.

Answer: False

Pashtuns are described as constituting the world's largest tribal society, with an estimated population of over 60 million people across numerous tribes and clans.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the image caption reveal about Pashtuns?: The image caption indicates that Pashtuns in Afghanistan and Pakistan constitute the world's largest tribal society. It estimates their population at over 60 million people, comprising between 350 and 400 tribes and clans.

The map of 'uncontacted tribes' illustrates their distribution as depicted around the start of the 20th century.

Answer: False

The map of 'uncontacted tribes' illustrates their distribution as depicted around the start of the 21st century, showing indigenous groups remaining isolated from the modern world.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the map of 'uncontacted tribes' illustrate?: The map of 'uncontacted tribes' illustrates the geographical distribution of indigenous groups who remain isolated from the modern world, as depicted around the start of the 21st century.

'Neotribalism' describes the decline of localized, identity-based group affiliations in modern societies.

Answer: False

'Neotribalism' describes the resurgence or formation of tribal-like social structures or identities in modern or postmodern societies, suggesting a return to localized, identity-based group affiliations.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'neotribalism'?: Neotribalism is a concept that describes the resurgence or formation of tribal-like social structures or identities in modern or postmodern societies. It suggests a return to smaller, more localized, and identity-based group affiliations.

'Tribal sovereignty' means a tribe must submit to external governmental control.

Answer: False

'Tribal sovereignty' refers to a tribe's inherent right to govern itself and its territory, independent of external governmental control, not submission to it.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'tribal sovereignty'?: Tribal sovereignty refers to the inherent right of a tribe to govern itself and its territory, independent of external governmental control. This concept is particularly relevant in the context of indigenous nations interacting with national governments.
  • What is the legal status of Native American tribes within the United States according to the provided text?: In the United States, Native American tribes are legally recognized as having 'domestic dependent nation' status. They maintain a government-to-government relationship with the federal government, signifying a degree of inherent sovereignty.
  • What is the status of Native American tribes in North America regarding sovereignty?: Native American tribes in North America are considered sovereign nations. They have either retained their sovereignty or been granted legal recognition by the federal government, which acknowledges their inherent right to self-governance.

What is the legal status of Native American tribes within the United States according to the text?

Answer: Domestic dependent nations with a government-to-government relationship

In the United States, Native American tribes are legally recognized as having 'domestic dependent nation' status, maintaining a government-to-government relationship with the federal government.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the legal status of Native American tribes within the United States according to the provided text?: In the United States, Native American tribes are legally recognized as having 'domestic dependent nation' status. They maintain a government-to-government relationship with the federal government, signifying a degree of inherent sovereignty.
  • What is the status of Native American tribes in North America regarding sovereignty?: Native American tribes in North America are considered sovereign nations. They have either retained their sovereignty or been granted legal recognition by the federal government, which acknowledges their inherent right to self-governance.

The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations similar to which other word?

Answer: Indian

The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations, similar to the word 'Indian,' that are associated with colonialism, contributing to its reduced usage in some academic circles.

Related Concepts:

  • What negative connotations has the term 'tribe' acquired?: The term 'tribe' has acquired negative connotations, similar to the word 'Indian,' that are associated with colonialism. This has contributed to its reduced usage in some academic circles.
  • What is the primary discipline that uses the term 'tribe' to categorize human social groups?: The predominant worldwide use of the term 'tribe' in English is within the discipline of anthropology. This usage refers to a category of human social group, though its definition is often debated among scholars.
  • What is the origin of the English word 'tribe'?: The modern English word 'tribe' originates from Middle English 'tribu,' which itself derives from the Latin word 'tribus.' The Latin term is believed to stem from a Proto-Indo-European compound meaning 'rendered in three' or 'tripartite division.'

How does Survival International distinguish between 'tribal' and 'indigenous' peoples?

Answer: Tribal peoples possess a special status acknowledged in international law

Survival International emphasizes the distinction between 'tribal' and 'indigenous' peoples, noting that tribal peoples possess a special status acknowledged in international law and face unique problems in addition to those common to the broader category of indigenous peoples.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Survival International distinguish between 'tribal' and 'indigenous' peoples?: Survival International emphasizes the distinction between 'tribal' and 'indigenous' peoples, noting that tribal peoples possess a special status acknowledged in international law. They also face unique problems in addition to those common to the broader category of indigenous peoples.

What has been the general trend for tribes in relation to modern state systems?

Answer: Few tribes remain isolated; many lost functions to states

Few tribes today remain isolated from modern state systems; many have lost their traditional functions, such as collecting tithes or administering justice, as these roles have been taken over by state institutions.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the general trend for tribes in relation to modern state systems?: Few tribes today remain isolated from modern state systems. Many have lost their traditional functions, such as collecting tithes, administering justice, and defending territory, as these roles have been taken over by state institutions like taxation, law courts, and the military. This has often led to a decline in cultural identity for many tribes.

Which regions are given as examples where states encouraged the formation of more centralized polities, sometimes labeled 'aboriginal tribes'?

Answer: United States and British India

The text provides the United States and British India as examples where states encouraged the formation of more centralized polities, often labeling these communities as 'aboriginal tribes'.

Related Concepts:

  • What examples are given for tribes that developed due to state expansion?: The text provides the example of tribes in the United States and British India as instances where states encouraged the formation of more centralized polities. These communities were often labeled 'aboriginal tribes' by colonial powers.

What is the status of Native American tribes in North America regarding sovereignty?

Answer: Retained sovereignty or granted legal recognition

Native American tribes in North America are considered sovereign nations, having either retained their sovereignty or been granted legal recognition by the federal government, acknowledging their inherent right to self-governance.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the status of Native American tribes in North America regarding sovereignty?: Native American tribes in North America are considered sovereign nations. They have either retained their sovereignty or been granted legal recognition by the federal government, which acknowledges their inherent right to self-governance.
  • What is the legal status of Native American tribes within the United States according to the provided text?: In the United States, Native American tribes are legally recognized as having 'domestic dependent nation' status. They maintain a government-to-government relationship with the federal government, signifying a degree of inherent sovereignty.
  • What is 'tribal sovereignty'?: Tribal sovereignty refers to the inherent right of a tribe to govern itself and its territory, independent of external governmental control. This concept is particularly relevant in the context of indigenous nations interacting with national governments.

What makes Yemen notable in the context of tribal structures in the Arab world?

Answer: It is the most tribal nation with deep integration of leaders

Yemen is notable as the most tribal nation in the Arab world, largely due to the significant influence of tribal leaders and their deep integration into various aspects of the Yemeni state.

Related Concepts:

  • What makes Yemen notable in the context of tribal structures in the Arab world?: Yemen is notable as the most tribal nation in the Arab world. This is largely due to the significant influence of tribal leaders and their deep integration into various aspects of the Yemeni state.
  • Approximately how many tribes are estimated to exist in Yemen?: Estimates for the number of tribes in Yemen vary, with approximately 200 tribes being commonly cited. However, some reports suggest there may be more than 400 tribes in the country.

What was the context for the creation of 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST) in India?

Answer: Advocacy for special protections

India's 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST) were created following advocacy by representatives of certain communities, such as Jaipal Singh for the Munda tribe, leading to special provisions and protections for these groups.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the context for the creation of 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST) in India?: India's Constituent Assembly debated special provisions for certain communities, referred to as 'Adibasi' or 'aboriginal.' Jaipal Singh, representing the Munda tribe, advocated for these provisions, leading to the creation of lists of communities deserving special protections, which became known as 'Scheduled Tribes' (ST).

What does the image caption reveal about Pashtuns?

Answer: They are the largest tribal society globally

The image caption indicates that Pashtuns in Afghanistan and Pakistan constitute the world's largest tribal society, with an estimated population of over 60 million people comprising between 350 and 400 tribes and clans.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the image caption reveal about Pashtuns?: The image caption indicates that Pashtuns in Afghanistan and Pakistan constitute the world's largest tribal society. It estimates their population at over 60 million people, comprising between 350 and 400 tribes and clans.

Associated Sociopolitical Structures

'Pantribal sodalities' are defined as kinship groups that operate exclusively within a single tribe.

Answer: False

'Pantribal sodalities' are defined as organizations that span across multiple tribes, potentially serving unifying or coordinating functions, not kinship groups operating exclusively within a single tribe.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'pantribal sodalities' refer to in the context of tribal organization?: Pantribal sodalities are mentioned as a form of leadership or organization within tribal structures. They represent groups that span across multiple tribes, potentially serving unifying or coordinating functions.
  • What is 'tribalism' as a concept in social science?: Tribalism refers to the state of being organized into or characterized by tribes. In social science, it can also describe a strong sense of loyalty and adherence to one's tribe or ethnic group, sometimes contrasted with broader national or political identities.

'Segmentary lineage' is a form of organization based on shared territory rather than kinship.

Answer: False

'Segmentary lineage' is a form of social and political organization common in tribal societies, structuring groups based on kinship, not shared territory.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'segmentary lineage' in the context of tribal political organization?: A segmentary lineage is a form of social and political organization common in tribal societies. It structures groups based on kinship, where larger segments are composed of smaller, related segments, often used for political and social coordination.
  • What is the definition of a tribe as a political unit, according to the text?: A tribe is defined as a political unit formed from an organization of families, which can include clans and lineages. This organization is based on social or ideological solidarity among its members.

'Customary law' refers to written legal codes established by modern state governments.

Answer: False

'Customary law' refers to the unwritten rules and norms that govern behavior and resolve disputes within a community, often predating or existing alongside formal legal systems.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of 'customary law' in relation to tribes?: Customary law refers to the unwritten rules and norms that govern behavior and resolve disputes within a community. For tribes, customary law often plays a central role in maintaining social order and resolving conflicts, predating or existing alongside formal legal systems.

'Ritual warfare' is primarily conducted for territorial conquest and resource acquisition.

Answer: False

'Ritual warfare' refers to conflicts conducted with specific ceremonies, rules, or symbolic meanings, often distinct from warfare aimed solely at territorial conquest or resource acquisition.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'ritual warfare' as it relates to tribal societies?: Ritual warfare refers to conflicts between groups that are conducted with specific ceremonies, rules, or symbolic meanings, often distinct from warfare aimed solely at territorial conquest or resource acquisition. It can serve social or political functions within tribal contexts.
  • What is 'tribal warfare'?: Tribal warfare refers to armed conflict between or among tribal groups. The nature and causes of tribal warfare can vary widely, encompassing resource competition, political disputes, or cultural rivalries.

A 'chiefdom' represents a political organization less complex and hierarchical than a tribe.

Answer: False

A 'chiefdom' represents a form of political organization that is generally more complex and hierarchical than a tribe, typically characterized by hereditary leadership.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'chiefdom' in the context of political organization, as contrasted with a tribe?: A chiefdom represents a form of political organization that is hierarchically larger and more complex than a tribe. Chiefdoms are typically characterized by hereditary leadership and a more centralized authority structure.
  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.
  • What is the definition of a tribe as a political unit, according to the text?: A tribe is defined as a political unit formed from an organization of families, which can include clans and lineages. This organization is based on social or ideological solidarity among its members.

A 'petty kingdom' is a political entity generally considered smaller and less complex than a chiefdom.

Answer: False

A 'petty kingdom' is generally considered larger and more complex than a chiefdom, representing a level of political organization that surpasses that of tribal structures.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'petty kingdom' in relation to tribal and chiefdom structures?: A petty kingdom is a political entity that is generally considered larger and more complex than a chiefdom. It represents a level of political organization that typically surpasses that of tribal structures.

'State formation' refers to the process of developing decentralized, kin-based groups.

Answer: False

'State formation' refers to the historical process by which centralized authority and monopoly over the legitimate use of force develop, contrasting with decentralized, kin-based groups.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'state formation' in the context of anthropology?: State formation refers to the historical process by which political entities develop into states, characterized by centralized authority, defined territory, and monopoly over the legitimate use of force. This process is often contrasted with the development of tribal societies.
  • What does the term 'stateless society' imply in relation to tribal structures?: A 'stateless society' is a society that lacks a centralized government or state apparatus. Many tribal societies are historically considered stateless, relying on kinship, segmentary lineages, or other forms of organization for governance and social order.
  • What examples are given for tribes that developed due to state expansion?: The text provides the example of tribes in the United States and British India as instances where states encouraged the formation of more centralized polities. These communities were often labeled 'aboriginal tribes' by colonial powers.

'Political economy in anthropology' examines the interplay between political power, economic systems, and social structures.

Answer: True

'Political economy in anthropology' examines the interplay between political power, economic systems, and social structures within different societies, analyzing resource control and distribution.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'political economy in anthropology'?: Political economy in anthropology examines the interplay between political power, economic systems, and social structures within different societies. It analyzes how resources are controlled, distributed, and how economic activities influence political organization, including in tribal contexts.

'Circumscription theory' explains state emergence primarily through increased population mobility.

Answer: False

'Circumscription theory' explains state emergence through factors limiting population movement, such as environmental or social barriers, not primarily through increased population mobility.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the relevance of 'circumscription theory' to understanding tribal or state development?: Circumscription theory, in anthropology, offers explanations for how states emerge, often relating to environmental or social factors that limit population movement and encourage the development of more complex political structures. It is a concept relevant to understanding the evolution beyond tribal societies.

'Stateless societies' are characterized by the presence of a strong central government.

Answer: False

'Stateless societies' are characterized by the absence of a strong central government or state apparatus, relying instead on kinship or other forms of organization for governance.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'stateless society' imply in relation to tribal structures?: A 'stateless society' is a society that lacks a centralized government or state apparatus. Many tribal societies are historically considered stateless, relying on kinship, segmentary lineages, or other forms of organization for governance and social order.

'Tribal warfare' is exclusively focused on resource acquisition.

Answer: False

'Tribal warfare' is not exclusively focused on resource acquisition; it can encompass various social, political, or ritualistic motivations and meanings.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'tribal warfare'?: Tribal warfare refers to armed conflict between or among tribal groups. The nature and causes of tribal warfare can vary widely, encompassing resource competition, political disputes, or cultural rivalries.

What does the term 'pantribal sodalities' refer to in the context of tribal organization?

Answer: Organizations that span across multiple tribes

Pantribal sodalities are organizations that span across multiple tribes, potentially serving unifying or coordinating functions within a broader cultural or geographical area.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'pantribal sodalities' refer to in the context of tribal organization?: Pantribal sodalities are mentioned as a form of leadership or organization within tribal structures. They represent groups that span across multiple tribes, potentially serving unifying or coordinating functions.

What is 'customary law' in relation to tribes?

Answer: Unwritten rules and norms within a community

Customary law refers to the unwritten rules and norms that govern behavior and resolve disputes within a community. For tribes, customary law often plays a central role in maintaining social order and resolving conflicts.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of 'customary law' in relation to tribes?: Customary law refers to the unwritten rules and norms that govern behavior and resolve disputes within a community. For tribes, customary law often plays a central role in maintaining social order and resolving conflicts, predating or existing alongside formal legal systems.

How does a 'chiefdom' compare to a 'tribe' in political organization?

Answer: More complex and hierarchical

A 'chiefdom' represents a form of political organization that is generally more complex and hierarchical than a tribe, typically characterized by hereditary leadership and a more centralized authority structure.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a 'chiefdom' in the context of political organization, as contrasted with a tribe?: A chiefdom represents a form of political organization that is hierarchically larger and more complex than a tribe. Chiefdoms are typically characterized by hereditary leadership and a more centralized authority structure.
  • How is the concept of a 'tribe' typically contrasted with other social and kinship groups in anthropology?: In anthropology, the concept of a tribe is often contrasted with other social and kinship groups by placing it hierarchically. It is generally considered larger than a lineage or clan, but smaller than a chiefdom, ethnicity, nation, or state. These terms themselves can also be subject to dispute.
  • What is the definition of a tribe as a political unit, according to the text?: A tribe is defined as a political unit formed from an organization of families, which can include clans and lineages. This organization is based on social or ideological solidarity among its members.

What does the term 'state formation' refer to in anthropology?

Answer: Centralized authority and monopoly on force

State formation refers to the historical process by which political entities develop into states, characterized by centralized authority, defined territory, and monopoly over the legitimate use of force, often contrasted with the development of tribal societies.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'state formation' in the context of anthropology?: State formation refers to the historical process by which political entities develop into states, characterized by centralized authority, defined territory, and monopoly over the legitimate use of force. This process is often contrasted with the development of tribal societies.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy