Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


Analysis of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Rankings

At a Glance

Title: Analysis of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Rankings

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Origin and Evolution of the Rankings: 8 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Ranking Methodology: Metrics and Weighting: 12 flashcards, 20 questions
  • Criticisms and Controversies: 14 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Institutional Impact and Influence: 9 flashcards, 14 questions
  • Recent Developments and Institutional Withdrawals: 9 flashcards, 9 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 52
  • True/False Questions: 30
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 30
  • Total Questions: 60

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Analysis of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Rankings

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Analysis of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Rankings

Study Guide: Analysis of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Rankings

Origin and Evolution of the Rankings

The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking is an annual publication detailing university performance.

Answer: True

The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking is indeed an annual compilation that assesses and presents data on university performance across the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • Could you define the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking constitutes an annual compilation of comparative assessments for higher education institutions situated within the United States, disseminated by the publication U.S. News & World Report.
  • When was the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking first published?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking was first published in 1983. It has since become a highly influential ranking system in the country.
  • What does the image accompanying the article depict?: The image shows the cover of the 2022 edition of the U.S. News & World Report magazine, specifically featuring its 'Best Colleges Ranking'. This visual element highlights the publication that is the subject of the article.

The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking was first published in the year 2000.

Answer: False

The inaugural publication of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking occurred in 1983, not 2000.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking first published?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking was first published in 1983. It has since become a highly influential ranking system in the country.
  • Could you define the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking constitutes an annual compilation of comparative assessments for higher education institutions situated within the United States, disseminated by the publication U.S. News & World Report.
  • What does the image accompanying the article depict?: The image shows the cover of the 2022 edition of the U.S. News & World Report magazine, specifically featuring its 'Best Colleges Ranking'. This visual element highlights the publication that is the subject of the article.

The image accompanying the article shows the cover of the 2014 edition of U.S. News & World Report magazine.

Answer: False

The source material indicates the accompanying image depicts the cover of the 2022 edition of U.S. News & World Report magazine, not the 2014 edition.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the image accompanying the article depict?: The image shows the cover of the 2022 edition of the U.S. News & World Report magazine, specifically featuring its 'Best Colleges Ranking'. This visual element highlights the publication that is the subject of the article.

The U.S. News & World Report rankings are divided into three main categories: National Universities, Liberal Arts Colleges, and Global Universities.

Answer: False

The U.S. News & World Report college rankings are divided into four main categories: National Universities, Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges. 'Global Universities' is not one of these primary divisions for the domestic ranking.

Related Concepts:

  • Into how many main categories are the U.S. News & World Report college rankings divided?: The U.S. News & World Report rankings are divided into four main categories: National Universities, Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges. The latter two categories are further subdivided by region (North, South, Midwest, and West).
  • Could you define the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking constitutes an annual compilation of comparative assessments for higher education institutions situated within the United States, disseminated by the publication U.S. News & World Report.
  • Have universities publicly set goals to improve their standing in the U.S. News & World Report rankings?: Yes, several universities have publicly stated goals related to improving their placement in the U.S. News & World Report rankings. This demonstrates the significant pressure institutions feel to perform well in these rankings.

Mel Elfin, founder of the rankings, justified the system's validity by pointing to the consistent top rankings of institutions like Harvard and Yale.

Answer: True

Mel Elfin, the founder, reportedly justified the rankings' validity by observing the consistent top placement of prestigious institutions such as Harvard and Yale, suggesting a circular logic based on pre-existing reputation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the founder of the U.S. News rankings, Mel Elfin, justify the system's validity?: According to a 2003 New York Times article, when asked how he knew his system was sound, Mel Elfin, the founder of the rankings, often responded that he knew it was valid because top-tier schools like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton consistently ranked at the top. This suggests a circular logic where the ranking confirmed the pre-existing prestige of certain institutions.

What is the primary function of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?

Answer: To publish an annual list ranking colleges and universities within the United States.

The primary function of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking is to compile and publish an annual list that ranks colleges and universities located within the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • Could you define the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking constitutes an annual compilation of comparative assessments for higher education institutions situated within the United States, disseminated by the publication U.S. News & World Report.
  • How influential is the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking in the United States?: The ranking has been described as the most influential institutional ranking in the United States. Its prominence significantly impacts how institutions are perceived and often influences student application decisions.
  • According to a 2010 University of Michigan study, what effect do U.S. News & World Report rankings have on college applications and admissions?: A 2010 study from the University of Michigan found that U.S. News & World Report rankings significantly influence college applications and admissions. The research indicated a lasting effect, particularly on students within the top 10% of their class, and also noted that rankings were increasingly aligning with survey assessments of reputation among college presidents.

When was the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking first introduced?

Answer: 1983

The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking was first introduced in the year 1983.

Related Concepts:

  • When was the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking first published?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking was first published in 1983. It has since become a highly influential ranking system in the country.
  • Could you define the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking constitutes an annual compilation of comparative assessments for higher education institutions situated within the United States, disseminated by the publication U.S. News & World Report.

Which of the following is NOT one of the main categories of U.S. News & World Report college rankings?

Answer: International Universities

The primary domestic categories for U.S. News & World Report college rankings are National Universities, Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges. 'International Universities' is not one of these standard classifications for the U.S. domestic rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • Into how many main categories are the U.S. News & World Report college rankings divided?: The U.S. News & World Report rankings are divided into four main categories: National Universities, Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges. The latter two categories are further subdivided by region (North, South, Midwest, and West).
  • Could you define the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?: The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking constitutes an annual compilation of comparative assessments for higher education institutions situated within the United States, disseminated by the publication U.S. News & World Report.
  • As of 2023, what is the general trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?: As of 2023, few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of the graduate schools in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings. The New York Times noted in September 2023 that this reflects the persistent 'psychic hold' these rankings maintain on American higher education, serving as an easy tool to attract applicants.

Ranking Methodology: Metrics and Weighting

In its 2023 edition, U.S. News & World Report ranked approximately 2,500 universities and colleges.

Answer: False

The 2023 edition of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking encompassed approximately 1,500 universities and colleges, not 2,500.

Related Concepts:

  • Approximately how many universities and colleges did U.S. News & World Report rank in its 2023 edition?: In its 2023 edition, U.S. News & World Report ranked close to 1,500 universities and colleges across the United States. This extensive scope reflects the broad reach of the ranking system.
  • Have universities publicly set goals to improve their standing in the U.S. News & World Report rankings?: Yes, several universities have publicly stated goals related to improving their placement in the U.S. News & World Report rankings. This demonstrates the significant pressure institutions feel to perform well in these rankings.
  • How were the changes made to the U.S. News ranking factors in 2023 perceived by critics?: The changes to the U.S. News ranking factors released with the 2023-24 edition were criticized by many as insufficient evidence of meaningful reform. Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, viewed the abrupt shifts in results as further proof that rankings are unreliable indicators of quality.

The 'Faculty resources' category is the most heavily weighted in the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings.

Answer: False

In the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings, the 'Outcomes' category holds the most weight (52%), not 'Faculty resources'.

Related Concepts:

  • What elements constitute the 'Faculty resources' category in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty resources' category, which makes up 11% of the ranking, includes three components: faculty salary (6%), the student-faculty ratio (3%), and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time (2%). These factors aim to reflect the quality and accessibility of academic staff.
  • What is the most heavily weighted category in the U.S. News National University rankings for 2023, and what percentage does it account for?: The 'Outcomes' category holds the most weight in the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings, accounting for 52% of the total score. This emphasizes the importance placed on student success after enrollment.
  • How were the changes made to the U.S. News ranking factors in 2023 perceived by critics?: The changes to the U.S. News ranking factors released with the 2023-24 edition were criticized by many as insufficient evidence of meaningful reform. Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, viewed the abrupt shifts in results as further proof that rankings are unreliable indicators of quality.

Graduation and retention rates are measured within the 'Faculty resources' category of the U.S. News rankings.

Answer: False

Graduation and retention rates are components of the 'Outcomes' category, not 'Faculty resources'. 'Faculty resources' pertains to faculty salary, student-faculty ratio, and full-time faculty proportion.

Related Concepts:

  • How are graduation and retention rates measured within the 'Outcomes' category of the U.S. News rankings?: Within the 'Outcomes' category, graduation and retention rates are assessed by two sub-factors: the proportion of students earning a degree within six years (weighted at 16%) and the percentage of first-year students who return for their second year (weighted at 5%). These metrics gauge student success and institutional persistence.
  • What elements constitute the 'Faculty resources' category in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty resources' category, which makes up 11% of the ranking, includes three components: faculty salary (6%), the student-faculty ratio (3%), and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time (2%). These factors aim to reflect the quality and accessibility of academic staff.
  • What is the most heavily weighted category in the U.S. News National University rankings for 2023, and what percentage does it account for?: The 'Outcomes' category holds the most weight in the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings, accounting for 52% of the total score. This emphasizes the importance placed on student success after enrollment.

The 'Graduation rate performance' metric assesses how well a university's actual graduation rates meet predictions for its entering class.

Answer: True

The 'Graduation rate performance' metric specifically evaluates the congruence between a university's observed six-year graduation rates and the predicted rates for its student cohort.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the 'Graduation rate performance' metric evaluate in the U.S. News National University rankings?: The 'Graduation rate performance' metric compares a university's actual six-year graduation rates against predictions for its entering class. This assesses how well the institution performs relative to its expected outcomes.
  • How are graduation and retention rates measured within the 'Outcomes' category of the U.S. News rankings?: Within the 'Outcomes' category, graduation and retention rates are assessed by two sub-factors: the proportion of students earning a degree within six years (weighted at 16%) and the percentage of first-year students who return for their second year (weighted at 5%). These metrics gauge student success and institutional persistence.

Social mobility in the U.S. News rankings focuses on the percentage of alumni who are employed in high-paying jobs.

Answer: False

Social mobility in the U.S. News rankings primarily assesses the success of institutions in graduating students who received federal Pell Grants and the performance of first-generation students, rather than focusing solely on alumni employment in high-paying jobs.

Related Concepts:

  • How does 'Social mobility' contribute to the U.S. News National University rankings?: Social mobility is measured by evaluating how effectively schools graduate students who received federal Pell Grants, which are typically awarded to students from lower-income backgrounds. It also considers the graduation rates and performance of first-generation students, aiming to assess how well institutions serve and advance students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Graduate indebtedness is a factor that accounts for 25% of the 'Outcomes' score in the U.S. News rankings.

Answer: False

Graduate indebtedness constitutes 5% of the 'Outcomes' score, not 25%. The 'Outcomes' category itself accounts for 52% of the total ranking score.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of 'Graduate indebtedness' in the U.S. News ranking methodology?: Graduate indebtedness is a factor that accounts for 5% of the 'Outcomes' score. It considers the typical average federal loan debt accumulated by student borrowers, suggesting a focus on the financial burden students face after graduation.
  • What is the most heavily weighted category in the U.S. News National University rankings for 2023, and what percentage does it account for?: The 'Outcomes' category holds the most weight in the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings, accounting for 52% of the total score. This emphasizes the importance placed on student success after enrollment.

'College Graduate Earning Potential' assesses whether graduates earn more than a typical high school graduate four years after degree completion, contributing 5% to the 'Outcomes' score.

Answer: True

This metric evaluates the earning potential of graduates who received federal loans, comparing their earnings four years post-degree to those of typical high school graduates, and it contributes 5% to the 'Outcomes' score.

Related Concepts:

  • How does 'College Graduate Earning Potential' factor into the U.S. News National University rankings?: This metric, worth 5% of the 'Outcomes' score, assesses the earning potential of college graduates who received federal loans. Specifically, it looks at whether these graduates earn more than a typical high school graduate four years after completing their degrees.
  • What is the significance of 'Graduate indebtedness' in the U.S. News ranking methodology?: Graduate indebtedness is a factor that accounts for 5% of the 'Outcomes' score. It considers the typical average federal loan debt accumulated by student borrowers, suggesting a focus on the financial burden students face after graduation.
  • How are graduation and retention rates measured within the 'Outcomes' category of the U.S. News rankings?: Within the 'Outcomes' category, graduation and retention rates are assessed by two sub-factors: the proportion of students earning a degree within six years (weighted at 16%) and the percentage of first-year students who return for their second year (weighted at 5%). These metrics gauge student success and institutional persistence.

The 'Faculty resources' category includes faculty salary, student-faculty ratio, and the proportion of full-time faculty.

Answer: True

The 'Faculty resources' component, weighted at 11%, indeed comprises faculty salary, the student-faculty ratio, and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time.

Related Concepts:

  • What elements constitute the 'Faculty resources' category in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty resources' category, which makes up 11% of the ranking, includes three components: faculty salary (6%), the student-faculty ratio (3%), and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time (2%). These factors aim to reflect the quality and accessibility of academic staff.
  • What does the 'Financial resources' metric assess in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Financial resources' metric, accounting for 8% of the ranking, evaluates the average spending per student on instruction, research, student services, and other related educational expenditures. This aims to reflect the investment an institution makes in its educational offerings.

The 'Expert opinion' component is determined by surveying undergraduate students about their satisfaction with faculty.

Answer: False

The 'Expert opinion' component is derived from surveys administered to college presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions, who rate the academic quality of peer institutions, not from undergraduate student satisfaction surveys.

Related Concepts:

  • How is 'Expert opinion' incorporated into the U.S. News National University rankings?: The 'Expert opinion' component, valued at 20%, is determined by surveying college presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions. They are asked to rate the academic quality of peer institutions they are familiar with on a scale from 1 (marginal) to 5 (distinguished).

The 'Financial resources' metric assesses the investment an institution makes in its educational offerings by evaluating average spending per student.

Answer: True

This metric, accounting for 8% of the ranking, quantifies institutional investment in education by examining average expenditures per student on instruction, research, and student services.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the 'Financial resources' metric assess in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Financial resources' metric, accounting for 8% of the ranking, evaluates the average spending per student on instruction, research, student services, and other related educational expenditures. This aims to reflect the investment an institution makes in its educational offerings.
  • What elements constitute the 'Faculty resources' category in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty resources' category, which makes up 11% of the ranking, includes three components: faculty salary (6%), the student-faculty ratio (3%), and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time (2%). These factors aim to reflect the quality and accessibility of academic staff.

Student selectivity is measured by the percentage of applicants who enroll and the graduation rate of the student body.

Answer: False

Student selectivity is primarily measured by standardized test scores of admitted students and the proportion of admitted students ranking in the upper percentiles of their high school class, not by enrollment percentage or overall graduation rate.

Related Concepts:

  • How are 'Student selectivity' metrics determined for the U.S. News National University rankings?: Student selectivity is measured by considering the standardized test scores of admitted students and the proportion of admitted students who ranked in the upper percentiles of their high school graduating class. These factors contribute 5% to the overall ranking.

The 'Faculty Research' component is based on the number of citations received for faculty papers while employed at the college.

Answer: True

This component, valued at 4%, quantifies the impact and recognition of faculty scholarship by assessing the citation counts of research papers produced by faculty during their tenure at the institution.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the basis for the 'Faculty Research' component in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty Research' component, worth 4% of the ranking, is based on the number of citations received for papers and research attributed to faculty members while they are employed at the college. This metric aims to quantify the impact and recognition of faculty scholarship.
  • What elements constitute the 'Faculty resources' category in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty resources' category, which makes up 11% of the ranking, includes three components: faculty salary (6%), the student-faculty ratio (3%), and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time (2%). These factors aim to reflect the quality and accessibility of academic staff.

In the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings, what category held the most weight, accounting for 52% of the score?

Answer: Outcomes

The 'Outcomes' category was the most heavily weighted in the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings, comprising 52% of the total score.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the most heavily weighted category in the U.S. News National University rankings for 2023, and what percentage does it account for?: The 'Outcomes' category holds the most weight in the 2023 U.S. News National University rankings, accounting for 52% of the total score. This emphasizes the importance placed on student success after enrollment.
  • Into how many main categories are the U.S. News & World Report college rankings divided?: The U.S. News & World Report rankings are divided into four main categories: National Universities, Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges. The latter two categories are further subdivided by region (North, South, Midwest, and West).
  • Approximately how many universities and colleges did U.S. News & World Report rank in its 2023 edition?: In its 2023 edition, U.S. News & World Report ranked close to 1,500 universities and colleges across the United States. This extensive scope reflects the broad reach of the ranking system.

How does the 'Graduation rate performance' metric specifically evaluate a university's success?

Answer: By comparing actual six-year graduation rates against predictions for the entering class.

This metric assesses success by comparing a university's actual six-year graduation rates against the predicted rates for its incoming student cohort.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the 'Graduation rate performance' metric evaluate in the U.S. News National University rankings?: The 'Graduation rate performance' metric compares a university's actual six-year graduation rates against predictions for its entering class. This assesses how well the institution performs relative to its expected outcomes.
  • How are graduation and retention rates measured within the 'Outcomes' category of the U.S. News rankings?: Within the 'Outcomes' category, graduation and retention rates are assessed by two sub-factors: the proportion of students earning a degree within six years (weighted at 16%) and the percentage of first-year students who return for their second year (weighted at 5%). These metrics gauge student success and institutional persistence.

Which metric within the 'Outcomes' category specifically assesses how well institutions serve students from lower-income backgrounds?

Answer: Social Mobility

The 'Social Mobility' metric is designed to evaluate how effectively institutions serve students from lower-income backgrounds, primarily by examining the graduation rates of Pell Grant recipients and first-generation students.

Related Concepts:

  • How are graduation and retention rates measured within the 'Outcomes' category of the U.S. News rankings?: Within the 'Outcomes' category, graduation and retention rates are assessed by two sub-factors: the proportion of students earning a degree within six years (weighted at 16%) and the percentage of first-year students who return for their second year (weighted at 5%). These metrics gauge student success and institutional persistence.
  • How does 'Social mobility' contribute to the U.S. News National University rankings?: Social mobility is measured by evaluating how effectively schools graduate students who received federal Pell Grants, which are typically awarded to students from lower-income backgrounds. It also considers the graduation rates and performance of first-generation students, aiming to assess how well institutions serve and advance students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
  • How does 'College Graduate Earning Potential' factor into the U.S. News National University rankings?: This metric, worth 5% of the 'Outcomes' score, assesses the earning potential of college graduates who received federal loans. Specifically, it looks at whether these graduates earn more than a typical high school graduate four years after completing their degrees.

What does the 'Faculty resources' category measure, contributing 11% to the overall ranking?

Answer: The average salary of faculty, student-faculty ratio, and proportion of full-time faculty.

The 'Faculty resources' category assesses the quality and accessibility of academic staff by measuring faculty salary levels, the student-faculty ratio, and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time.

Related Concepts:

  • What elements constitute the 'Faculty resources' category in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty resources' category, which makes up 11% of the ranking, includes three components: faculty salary (6%), the student-faculty ratio (3%), and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time (2%). These factors aim to reflect the quality and accessibility of academic staff.
  • What does the 'Financial resources' metric assess in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Financial resources' metric, accounting for 8% of the ranking, evaluates the average spending per student on instruction, research, student services, and other related educational expenditures. This aims to reflect the investment an institution makes in its educational offerings.
  • What is the basis for the 'Faculty Research' component in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty Research' component, worth 4% of the ranking, is based on the number of citations received for papers and research attributed to faculty members while they are employed at the college. This metric aims to quantify the impact and recognition of faculty scholarship.

How is the 'Expert opinion' component of the U.S. News rankings determined?

Answer: By surveying college presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions about peer institution quality.

The 'Expert opinion' component, which carries significant weight (20%), is determined by surveying academic leaders such as college presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions regarding their assessment of peer institution quality.

Related Concepts:

  • How is 'Expert opinion' incorporated into the U.S. News National University rankings?: The 'Expert opinion' component, valued at 20%, is determined by surveying college presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions. They are asked to rate the academic quality of peer institutions they are familiar with on a scale from 1 (marginal) to 5 (distinguished).
  • What was the National Opinion Research Center's assessment of the U.S. News methodology weights in 2000?: In 2000, the National Opinion Research Center reviewed the U.S. News methodology and stated that the weights assigned to different factors 'lack any defensible empirical or theoretical basis.' This critique questions the scientific or logical foundation of the ranking system's structure.
  • What did an exposé in the San Francisco Chronicle suggest about the U.S. News & World Report ranking methodology?: An exposé in the San Francisco Chronicle suggested that the elements within the U.S. News & World Report methodology are redundant and are primarily driven by financial incentives. This implies that the ranking criteria may not be purely academic or objective.

The 'Financial resources' metric assesses the investment an institution makes in its educational offerings by evaluating:

Answer: The average spending per student on educational expenditures.

The 'Financial resources' metric evaluates the average amount of money a university spends per student on instruction, research, and student services, reflecting its commitment to educational expenditures.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the 'Financial resources' metric assess in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Financial resources' metric, accounting for 8% of the ranking, evaluates the average spending per student on instruction, research, student services, and other related educational expenditures. This aims to reflect the investment an institution makes in its educational offerings.

Which factors are used to measure 'Student selectivity' in the U.S. News rankings?

Answer: Standardized test scores of admitted students and their high school class rank.

Student selectivity is measured by assessing the standardized test scores of admitted students and the proportion of those students who ranked in the upper percentiles of their high school graduating class.

Related Concepts:

  • How are 'Student selectivity' metrics determined for the U.S. News National University rankings?: Student selectivity is measured by considering the standardized test scores of admitted students and the proportion of admitted students who ranked in the upper percentiles of their high school graduating class. These factors contribute 5% to the overall ranking.

What does the 'Faculty Research' component, worth 4% of the ranking, quantify?

Answer: The impact and recognition of faculty scholarship through citation counts.

The 'Faculty Research' component quantifies the scholarly impact and recognition of faculty by measuring the citation counts of their research papers published during their tenure at the institution.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the basis for the 'Faculty Research' component in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty Research' component, worth 4% of the ranking, is based on the number of citations received for papers and research attributed to faculty members while they are employed at the college. This metric aims to quantify the impact and recognition of faculty scholarship.
  • What elements constitute the 'Faculty resources' category in the U.S. News rankings?: The 'Faculty resources' category, which makes up 11% of the ranking, includes three components: faculty salary (6%), the student-faculty ratio (3%), and the proportion of faculty members who are full-time (2%). These factors aim to reflect the quality and accessibility of academic staff.

Criticisms and Controversies

A primary criticism of the U.S. News rankings is that they rely heavily on peer-reviewed research papers published by faculty.

Answer: False

A significant criticism is not the reliance on peer-reviewed research, but rather the heavy dependence on potentially inaccurate or manipulated self-reported data and the encouragement of institutions to 'game the system'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the National Opinion Research Center's assessment of the U.S. News methodology weights in 2000?: In 2000, the National Opinion Research Center reviewed the U.S. News methodology and stated that the weights assigned to different factors 'lack any defensible empirical or theoretical basis.' This critique questions the scientific or logical foundation of the ranking system's structure.
  • What is a significant concern regarding SAT scores in the U.S. News & World Report college rankings?: A concern is that SAT scores play a role in the rankings, even though U.S. News does not have the authority to formally verify or recalculate the scores submitted by schools. This has led to documented instances where institutions have allegedly misrepresented their SAT scores to achieve a higher ranking.
  • As of 2023, what is the general trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?: As of 2023, few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of the graduate schools in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings. The New York Times noted in September 2023 that this reflects the persistent 'psychic hold' these rankings maintain on American higher education, serving as an easy tool to attract applicants.

A significant concern regarding SAT scores is that U.S. News verifies and recalculates all submitted scores to ensure accuracy.

Answer: False

A key concern is that U.S. News *does not* verify or recalculate submitted SAT scores, creating opportunities for misrepresentation and impacting data integrity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a significant concern regarding SAT scores in the U.S. News & World Report college rankings?: A concern is that SAT scores play a role in the rankings, even though U.S. News does not have the authority to formally verify or recalculate the scores submitted by schools. This has led to documented instances where institutions have allegedly misrepresented their SAT scores to achieve a higher ranking.

An exposé in the San Francisco Chronicle suggested the U.S. News methodology was primarily driven by academic rigor.

Answer: False

The San Francisco Chronicle exposé suggested the methodology was driven by financial incentives and redundancy, not primarily by academic rigor.

Related Concepts:

  • What did an exposé in the San Francisco Chronicle suggest about the U.S. News & World Report ranking methodology?: An exposé in the San Francisco Chronicle suggested that the elements within the U.S. News & World Report methodology are redundant and are primarily driven by financial incentives. This implies that the ranking criteria may not be purely academic or objective.
  • What was the National Opinion Research Center's assessment of the U.S. News methodology weights in 2000?: In 2000, the National Opinion Research Center reviewed the U.S. News methodology and stated that the weights assigned to different factors 'lack any defensible empirical or theoretical basis.' This critique questions the scientific or logical foundation of the ranking system's structure.
  • What was U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona's view on ranking systems like U.S. News in 2022?: In 2022, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona described ranking systems similar to U.S. News as 'a joke.' He stated that these systems have fostered an 'unhealthy obsession with selectivity' and called for a 'culture change' in higher education.

In 2000, the National Opinion Research Center found the weights assigned in the U.S. News methodology to have a strong empirical basis.

Answer: False

The National Opinion Research Center, in its 2000 review, concluded that the weights assigned in the U.S. News methodology 'lack any defensible empirical or theoretical basis,' questioning its foundation.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the National Opinion Research Center's assessment of the U.S. News methodology weights in 2000?: In 2000, the National Opinion Research Center reviewed the U.S. News methodology and stated that the weights assigned to different factors 'lack any defensible empirical or theoretical basis.' This critique questions the scientific or logical foundation of the ranking system's structure.

Which of the following is a significant criticism mentioned regarding the U.S. News & World Report rankings?

Answer: They encourage institutions to prioritize gaming the system over educational quality due to reliance on potentially inaccurate self-reported data.

A major criticism is that the rankings incentivize institutions to manipulate data for higher placement, often due to the reliance on self-reported information which may be inaccurate or misleading, potentially compromising genuine educational quality.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the National Opinion Research Center's assessment of the U.S. News methodology weights in 2000?: In 2000, the National Opinion Research Center reviewed the U.S. News methodology and stated that the weights assigned to different factors 'lack any defensible empirical or theoretical basis.' This critique questions the scientific or logical foundation of the ranking system's structure.
  • What is a significant concern regarding SAT scores in the U.S. News & World Report college rankings?: A concern is that SAT scores play a role in the rankings, even though U.S. News does not have the authority to formally verify or recalculate the scores submitted by schools. This has led to documented instances where institutions have allegedly misrepresented their SAT scores to achieve a higher ranking.
  • What is a significant criticism leveled against the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking?: A significant criticism is that the rankings have been denounced by numerous education experts. Detractors argue that the rankings rely on self-reported data, which can sometimes be inaccurate or even fraudulent, and that they encourage institutions to prioritize gaming the system over genuine educational quality.

What concern did Michele Tolela Myers raise in 2007 regarding U.S. News & World Report's handling of SAT scores for test-optional universities?

Answer: That U.S. News assigned invented scores significantly lower than the norm when scores were missing.

Michele Tolela Myers voiced concern in 2007 that U.S. News assigned invented SAT scores, approximately one standard deviation below the norm, for universities that did not submit scores, potentially disadvantaging test-optional institutions.

Related Concepts:

  • What concern did Michele Tolela Myers raise in 2007 about U.S. News & World Report's handling of SAT scores?: Michele Tolela Myers raised concerns that when U.S. News & World Report did not receive SAT scores for a university, it would assign an invented score approximately one standard deviation below the norm. She estimated this was about 200 SAT points lower than peer colleges, reasoning that test-optional universities might accept less academically capable students due to their policy.

According to Kevin Carey, what are the primary drivers of the U.S. News & World Report college rankings?

Answer: Fame, wealth, and exclusivity.

Kevin Carey posits that the U.S. News & World Report college rankings are predominantly driven by factors such as fame, wealth, and exclusivity, rather than purely academic merit or educational outcomes.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Kevin Carey of Education Sector, what are the main drivers of the U.S. News & World Report college rankings?: Kevin Carey asserts that the U.S. News & World Report rankings are largely determined by three factors: fame, wealth, and exclusivity. He believes the system mirrors superficial characteristics of elite institutions rather than focusing on educational quality or student outcomes.
  • What does Kevin Carey recommend as more important factors for students and parents to consider when choosing a college?: Kevin Carey suggests that parents and students should prioritize researching how well colleges and universities educate their students and how effectively they prepare them for success after graduation. He believes these aspects are more crucial than the prestige indicated by rankings.

How did U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona describe ranking systems like U.S. News in 2022?

Answer: As 'a joke' that fosters an 'unhealthy obsession with selectivity.'

In 2022, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona characterized ranking systems such as U.S. News as 'a joke,' asserting that they cultivate an 'unhealthy obsession with selectivity' and advocating for a cultural shift in higher education.

Related Concepts:

  • What was U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona's view on ranking systems like U.S. News in 2022?: In 2022, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona described ranking systems similar to U.S. News as 'a joke.' He stated that these systems have fostered an 'unhealthy obsession with selectivity' and called for a 'culture change' in higher education.
  • How were the changes made to the U.S. News ranking factors in 2023 perceived by critics?: The changes to the U.S. News ranking factors released with the 2023-24 edition were criticized by many as insufficient evidence of meaningful reform. Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, viewed the abrupt shifts in results as further proof that rankings are unreliable indicators of quality.

How were the changes made to the U.S. News ranking factors in the 2023-24 edition perceived by critics like Ted Mitchell?

Answer: As insufficient evidence of meaningful reform, highlighting unreliability.

Critics, including Ted Mitchell, perceived the modifications to the U.S. News ranking factors in the 2023-24 edition as insufficient evidence of genuine reform, underscoring the continued unreliability of the rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • How were the changes made to the U.S. News ranking factors in 2023 perceived by critics?: The changes to the U.S. News ranking factors released with the 2023-24 edition were criticized by many as insufficient evidence of meaningful reform. Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, viewed the abrupt shifts in results as further proof that rankings are unreliable indicators of quality.
  • What was U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona's view on ranking systems like U.S. News in 2022?: In 2022, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona described ranking systems similar to U.S. News as 'a joke.' He stated that these systems have fostered an 'unhealthy obsession with selectivity' and called for a 'culture change' in higher education.

Institutional Impact and Influence

The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking is considered the least influential ranking system in the United States.

Answer: False

Contrary to being the least influential, the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking is widely regarded as the most influential institutional ranking system within the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • According to a 2010 University of Michigan study, what effect do U.S. News & World Report rankings have on college applications and admissions?: A 2010 study from the University of Michigan found that U.S. News & World Report rankings significantly influence college applications and admissions. The research indicated a lasting effect, particularly on students within the top 10% of their class, and also noted that rankings were increasingly aligning with survey assessments of reputation among college presidents.
  • How influential is the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking in the United States?: The ranking has been described as the most influential institutional ranking in the United States. Its prominence significantly impacts how institutions are perceived and often influences student application decisions.
  • As of 2023, what is the general trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?: As of 2023, few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of the graduate schools in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings. The New York Times noted in September 2023 that this reflects the persistent 'psychic hold' these rankings maintain on American higher education, serving as an easy tool to attract applicants.

Princeton University was ranked as the highest university in the 2025-26 U.S. News & World Report rankings.

Answer: True

According to the source, Princeton University achieved the position of the highest-ranked university in the 2025-26 iteration of the U.S. News & World Report rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • Which university was identified as the highest-ranked in the 2025-26 U.S. News & World Report rankings?: Princeton University was named the highest-ranked university in the 2025-26 U.S. News & World Report rankings. This ranking considered criteria such as degree offerings at undergraduate and graduate levels, as well as research output.

On the release day of the 2014 rankings, usnews.com had over 20 million unique visitors.

Answer: False

On the release day of the 2014 rankings, usnews.com recorded 2.6 million unique visitors and 18.9 million page views, not over 20 million unique visitors.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the website traffic for usnews.com on the release day of the 2014 rankings?: On the release day of the 2014 rankings, the website usnews.com attracted 2.6 million unique visitors and generated 18.9 million page views. This indicates significant public interest in the rankings.

A 2010 University of Michigan study found that U.S. News rankings had minimal impact on college applications.

Answer: False

A 2010 University of Michigan study indicated that U.S. News rankings had a significant impact on college applications and admissions, particularly for students in the top 10% of their class.

Related Concepts:

  • According to a 2010 University of Michigan study, what effect do U.S. News & World Report rankings have on college applications and admissions?: A 2010 study from the University of Michigan found that U.S. News & World Report rankings significantly influence college applications and admissions. The research indicated a lasting effect, particularly on students within the top 10% of their class, and also noted that rankings were increasingly aligning with survey assessments of reputation among college presidents.
  • As of 2023, what is the general trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?: As of 2023, few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of the graduate schools in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings. The New York Times noted in September 2023 that this reflects the persistent 'psychic hold' these rankings maintain on American higher education, serving as an easy tool to attract applicants.
  • What correlation was found between a university's rank improvement and its applicant numbers in a 2011 study?: A 2011 study indicated that a one-rank improvement in university rankings led to an approximate 0.9% increase in the number of applicants. This suggests a direct relationship between ranking position and institutional attractiveness to prospective students.

A 2011 study showed that a one-rank improvement increased the number of applicants by approximately 5%.

Answer: False

A 2011 study found that a one-rank improvement led to an approximate 0.9% increase in applicants, not 5%.

Related Concepts:

  • What correlation was found between a university's rank improvement and its applicant numbers in a 2011 study?: A 2011 study indicated that a one-rank improvement in university rankings led to an approximate 0.9% increase in the number of applicants. This suggests a direct relationship between ranking position and institutional attractiveness to prospective students.

Universities have never publicly set goals to improve their standing in the U.S. News & World Report rankings.

Answer: False

Numerous universities have publicly declared goals aimed at enhancing their position within the U.S. News & World Report rankings, demonstrating the perceived importance of these rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • Have universities publicly set goals to improve their standing in the U.S. News & World Report rankings?: Yes, several universities have publicly stated goals related to improving their placement in the U.S. News & World Report rankings. This demonstrates the significant pressure institutions feel to perform well in these rankings.
  • As of 2023, what is the general trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?: As of 2023, few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of the graduate schools in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings. The New York Times noted in September 2023 that this reflects the persistent 'psychic hold' these rankings maintain on American higher education, serving as an easy tool to attract applicants.
  • What was U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona's view on ranking systems like U.S. News in 2022?: In 2022, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona described ranking systems similar to U.S. News as 'a joke.' He stated that these systems have fostered an 'unhealthy obsession with selectivity' and called for a 'culture change' in higher education.

Clemson University's president aimed to reach the top 50 among public universities by altering presentation of teacher salaries.

Answer: False

Clemson University's president aimed for a top 20 public university ranking, and actions included altering the presentation of teacher salaries and reducing class sizes, not specifically targeting the top 50.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific actions did Clemson University's president take to achieve a top 20 public university ranking?: In 2001, Clemson University's president, James Frazier Barker, made it a public goal to reach the top 20 among public universities. Actions taken included reducing class sizes and altering the presentation of teacher salaries, aiming to improve the university's performance in the publication's statistical rankings.

Arizona State University linked its president's compensation to a decrease in the school's U.S. News ranking in 2007.

Answer: False

Arizona State University linked its president's compensation to an *increase*, not a decrease, in the school's U.S. News ranking in 2007.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Arizona State University link its president's compensation to its U.S. News rankings?: In 2007, Arizona State University tied its university president's pay to an increase in the school's placement within the U.S. News rankings. This practice highlights the financial incentives that can be associated with ranking performance.

How is the influence of the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking described within the United States?

Answer: As the most influential institutional ranking.

The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking is widely characterized as the most influential institutional ranking system operating within the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • According to a 2010 University of Michigan study, what effect do U.S. News & World Report rankings have on college applications and admissions?: A 2010 study from the University of Michigan found that U.S. News & World Report rankings significantly influence college applications and admissions. The research indicated a lasting effect, particularly on students within the top 10% of their class, and also noted that rankings were increasingly aligning with survey assessments of reputation among college presidents.
  • How influential is the U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking in the United States?: The ranking has been described as the most influential institutional ranking in the United States. Its prominence significantly impacts how institutions are perceived and often influences student application decisions.
  • As of 2023, what is the general trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?: As of 2023, few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of the graduate schools in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings. The New York Times noted in September 2023 that this reflects the persistent 'psychic hold' these rankings maintain on American higher education, serving as an easy tool to attract applicants.

According to the source, Princeton University held which position in the 2025-26 U.S. News & World Report rankings?

Answer: Highest-ranked university

The source indicates that Princeton University was designated as the highest-ranked university in the 2025-26 U.S. News & World Report rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • Which university was identified as the highest-ranked in the 2025-26 U.S. News & World Report rankings?: Princeton University was named the highest-ranked university in the 2025-26 U.S. News & World Report rankings. This ranking considered criteria such as degree offerings at undergraduate and graduate levels, as well as research output.

What significant public interest was demonstrated on the release day of the 2014 U.S. News rankings, according to website traffic data?

Answer: 2.6 million unique visitors and 18.9 million page views.

Website traffic data for usnews.com on the 2014 rankings release day showed 2.6 million unique visitors and 18.9 million page views, indicating substantial public engagement.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the website traffic for usnews.com on the release day of the 2014 rankings?: On the release day of the 2014 rankings, the website usnews.com attracted 2.6 million unique visitors and generated 18.9 million page views. This indicates significant public interest in the rankings.

A 2010 University of Michigan study indicated that U.S. News rankings had a significant effect on:

Answer: College applications and admissions, especially for top students.

The 2010 University of Michigan study concluded that U.S. News rankings exerted a significant influence on college applications and admissions, particularly impacting the decisions of high-achieving students.

Related Concepts:

  • According to a 2010 University of Michigan study, what effect do U.S. News & World Report rankings have on college applications and admissions?: A 2010 study from the University of Michigan found that U.S. News & World Report rankings significantly influence college applications and admissions. The research indicated a lasting effect, particularly on students within the top 10% of their class, and also noted that rankings were increasingly aligning with survey assessments of reputation among college presidents.

What was the finding of a 2011 study regarding the relationship between a university's rank improvement and its applicant pool?

Answer: A one-rank improvement led to approximately a 0.9% increase in applicants.

A 2011 study demonstrated a positive correlation, indicating that a single-rank improvement in university rankings corresponded to an approximate 0.9% increase in the number of applicants.

Related Concepts:

  • What correlation was found between a university's rank improvement and its applicant numbers in a 2011 study?: A 2011 study indicated that a one-rank improvement in university rankings led to an approximate 0.9% increase in the number of applicants. This suggests a direct relationship between ranking position and institutional attractiveness to prospective students.

What action did Clemson University's president, James Frazier Barker, take in 2001 to improve the university's ranking?

Answer: Reduced class sizes and altered the presentation of teacher salaries.

In 2001, Clemson University's president, James Frazier Barker, implemented strategies such as reducing class sizes and modifying the reporting of teacher salaries as part of an effort to enhance the university's standing in the rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific actions did Clemson University's president take to achieve a top 20 public university ranking?: In 2001, Clemson University's president, James Frazier Barker, made it a public goal to reach the top 20 among public universities. Actions taken included reducing class sizes and altering the presentation of teacher salaries, aiming to improve the university's performance in the publication's statistical rankings.

Recent Developments and Institutional Withdrawals

Reed College was the last institution to stop submitting its data for the U.S. News survey in the late 1990s.

Answer: False

Reed College was the *first* institution to stop submitting data in 1995, initiating a trend that saw other institutions follow suit later.

Related Concepts:

  • Which college initiated the movement to boycott the U.S. News & World Report college rankings survey in the 1990s?: Reed College was the first institution to stop submitting its data for the U.S. News & World Report college rankings survey, doing so in 1995. This marked the beginning of a movement by some institutions to withdraw from the survey.
  • Besides Reed College, which other institutions were noted for criticizing or boycotting the U.S. News survey in the late 1990s?: In addition to Reed College, Alma College, Stanford University, and St. John's College were also noted for criticizing or boycotting the U.S. News & World Report survey during the late 1990s. This indicates a broader dissatisfaction with the ranking system among some educational institutions.

Which institution was the first to stop submitting its data for the U.S. News & World Report college rankings survey in 1995?

Answer: Reed College

Reed College was the pioneering institution to cease its participation in the U.S. News & World Report college rankings survey, doing so in 1995.

Related Concepts:

  • Which college initiated the movement to boycott the U.S. News & World Report college rankings survey in the 1990s?: Reed College was the first institution to stop submitting its data for the U.S. News & World Report college rankings survey, doing so in 1995. This marked the beginning of a movement by some institutions to withdraw from the survey.
  • Besides Reed College, which other institutions were noted for criticizing or boycotting the U.S. News survey in the late 1990s?: In addition to Reed College, Alma College, Stanford University, and St. John's College were also noted for criticizing or boycotting the U.S. News & World Report survey during the late 1990s. This indicates a broader dissatisfaction with the ranking system among some educational institutions.

What did Professor Michael Thaddeus report about Columbia University's data submission in 2022?

Answer: That Columbia University had misreported data, causing its ranking to drop significantly.

Professor Michael Thaddeus reported in 2022 that Columbia University had submitted inaccurate data, which led to a substantial decline in its ranking from second to 18th place.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the impact on Columbia University's undergraduate ranking after the 2022 revelations of faulty data submission?: Following the February 2022 revelations by Professor Michael Thaddeus that Columbia University had submitted faulty data, its undergraduate program's ranking dropped significantly from second to 18th place in the 2022-2023 rankings. This highlights the sensitivity of rankings to data accuracy.
  • What specific criticism did a Columbia University professor make in 2022 regarding the university's ranking data?: In 2022, a professor at Columbia University, Michael Thaddeus, challenged the validity of the university's ranking data. His report revealed that Columbia University had misreported data to U.S. News & World Report, leading to a significant drop in its ranking from second to 18th place.

Why did the dean of Yale Law School state the school was withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings?

Answer: Because the rankings were considered 'profoundly flawed' and hindering progress.

The dean of Yale Law School cited that the U.S. News rankings were 'profoundly flawed' and actively impeded progress, leading to the school's decision to withdraw its participation.

Related Concepts:

  • What reason did the dean of Yale Law School provide for the school's withdrawal from the U.S. News rankings?: The dean of Yale Law School stated that the U.S. News rankings were 'profoundly flawed' and that their approach not only fails to advance the legal profession but actively hinders progress. This marked a significant departure from a long-standing participation in the rankings.

Which prominent law schools followed Yale Law School's lead in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings?

Answer: Harvard and UC Berkeley

Following Yale Law School's withdrawal, Harvard Law School and UC Berkeley School of Law were among the prominent institutions that subsequently announced their cessation of participation in the U.S. News rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • What reason did the dean of Yale Law School provide for the school's withdrawal from the U.S. News rankings?: The dean of Yale Law School stated that the U.S. News rankings were 'profoundly flawed' and that their approach not only fails to advance the legal profession but actively hinders progress. This marked a significant departure from a long-standing participation in the rankings.
  • Which other prominent law schools joined Yale Law School in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings?: Following Yale Law School's withdrawal, Harvard Law School and UC Berkeley School of Law quickly announced their participation cessation. Subsequently, law schools at Georgetown, Columbia, Stanford, the University of Michigan, Duke, Northwestern, UCLA, UC Irvine, UC Davis, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Washington, and New York University also withdrew, citing similar reasons.

As of 2023, what was the trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?

Answer: Few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of graduate schools in withdrawing.

As of 2023, the trend indicated that relatively few undergraduate institutions had joined the boycott initiated by graduate schools, suggesting the rankings still held considerable sway over undergraduate institutional decisions.

Related Concepts:

  • As of 2023, what is the general trend regarding undergraduate schools joining the boycott of U.S. News rankings initiated by graduate schools?: As of 2023, few undergraduate schools had followed the lead of the graduate schools in withdrawing from the U.S. News rankings. The New York Times noted in September 2023 that this reflects the persistent 'psychic hold' these rankings maintain on American higher education, serving as an easy tool to attract applicants.
  • Which medical schools announced their withdrawal from cooperation with U.S. News & World Report rankings in January 2023?: In January 2023, the medical schools at Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai all announced they would cease cooperating with the U.S. News & World Report rankings. This followed the trend of withdrawal seen in law schools.

Which medical schools were among those that announced withdrawal from cooperation with U.S. News & World Report rankings in January 2023?

Answer: Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia

In January 2023, the medical schools at Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia were among several institutions that announced their withdrawal from cooperation with the U.S. News & World Report rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • Which medical schools announced their withdrawal from cooperation with U.S. News & World Report rankings in January 2023?: In January 2023, the medical schools at Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai all announced they would cease cooperating with the U.S. News & World Report rankings. This followed the trend of withdrawal seen in law schools.

Columbia University stated its undergraduate schools would no longer participate in U.S. News rankings because the rankings:

Answer: Unduly influenced applicants and distilled the university's profile into data categories.

Columbia University cited that the rankings unduly influenced applicants and reduced the institution's complex profile to simplistic data categories as reasons for its undergraduate schools' withdrawal from participation.

Related Concepts:

  • What reason did Columbia University provide for its undergraduate schools no longer participating in the U.S. News rankings?: Columbia University stated that its undergraduate schools would no longer participate in the U.S. News rankings because such rankings unduly influence applicants and 'distill a university’s profile into a composite of data categories.' This decision followed revelations that the university had submitted faulty data in the past.
  • What specific criticism did a Columbia University professor make in 2022 regarding the university's ranking data?: In 2022, a professor at Columbia University, Michael Thaddeus, challenged the validity of the university's ranking data. His report revealed that Columbia University had misreported data to U.S. News & World Report, leading to a significant drop in its ranking from second to 18th place.
  • What was the impact on Columbia University's undergraduate ranking after the 2022 revelations of faulty data submission?: Following the February 2022 revelations by Professor Michael Thaddeus that Columbia University had submitted faulty data, its undergraduate program's ranking dropped significantly from second to 18th place in the 2022-2023 rankings. This highlights the sensitivity of rankings to data accuracy.

What was the impact on Columbia University's undergraduate ranking in the 2022-2023 rankings following revelations of faulty data submission?

Answer: It dropped from second to 18th place.

Following the revelations of faulty data submission in 2022, Columbia University's undergraduate ranking experienced a significant decline, falling from second place to 18th in the 2022-2023 rankings.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the impact on Columbia University's undergraduate ranking after the 2022 revelations of faulty data submission?: Following the February 2022 revelations by Professor Michael Thaddeus that Columbia University had submitted faulty data, its undergraduate program's ranking dropped significantly from second to 18th place in the 2022-2023 rankings. This highlights the sensitivity of rankings to data accuracy.
  • What reason did Columbia University provide for its undergraduate schools no longer participating in the U.S. News rankings?: Columbia University stated that its undergraduate schools would no longer participate in the U.S. News rankings because such rankings unduly influence applicants and 'distill a university’s profile into a composite of data categories.' This decision followed revelations that the university had submitted faulty data in the past.
  • What specific criticism did a Columbia University professor make in 2022 regarding the university's ranking data?: In 2022, a professor at Columbia University, Michael Thaddeus, challenged the validity of the university's ranking data. His report revealed that Columbia University had misreported data to U.S. News & World Report, leading to a significant drop in its ranking from second to 18th place.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy