Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
An "Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter" (IM) in East Germany was a publicly acknowledged official tasked with gathering intelligence.
Answer: False
The designation 'Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter' (IM) signifies an *unofficial* collaborator, not a publicly acknowledged official. These individuals provided private information to the Stasi.
The Stasi deliberately chose terms like "Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter" to align their informant terminology with that of the Nazi regime's police forces.
Answer: False
The Stasi selected terms such as 'Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter' precisely to *distance* their informant vocabulary from that of the Nazi regime and avoid association with terms like 'V-Mann'.
The term "Informal collaborator (IM)" was always precisely defined by the Stasi, leaving no room for ambiguity.
Answer: False
The BStU has repeatedly noted that the term 'Informal collaborator (IM)' was often imprecise, necessitating careful investigation to determine individual roles and responsibilities.
Why did the Stasi choose specific terminology like "Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter"?
Answer: To differentiate their informant vocabulary from that of the preceding Nazi regime.
The Stasi selected terms such as 'Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter' precisely to *distance* their informant vocabulary from that of the Nazi regime and avoid association with terms like 'V-Mann'.
What did the BStU repeatedly emphasize regarding the definition of an "Informal collaborator (IM)"?
Answer: That the term was frequently imprecise, necessitating careful investigation.
The BStU consistently highlighted that the term 'Informal collaborator (IM)' was often imprecise, requiring careful investigation to ascertain individual roles and responsibilities.
The network of unofficial collaborators (IMs) was considered a minor tool of the East German state, lacking significant influence.
Answer: False
The network of unofficial collaborators (IMs) was considered a crucial instrument of repression and a vital pillar supporting the East German one-party state's power.
The IM network was primarily focused on operations outside of East Germany, with extensive activities documented abroad.
Answer: False
The IM network was almost exclusively a domestic operation within East Germany, with limited surviving information regarding extensive activities abroad.
The primary activities of Informal Collaborators involved gathering intelligence on foreign political dissidents.
Answer: False
The primary activities of Informal Collaborators typically involved gathering information on individuals within their domestic or work environments, including close friends and family members, rather than exclusively foreign political dissidents.
What was the primary role of an "Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter" (IM) in East Germany?
Answer: An informant providing private information to the Ministry for State Security (Stasi).
The primary role of an 'Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter' (IM) was to act as an informant, providing private information to the Stasi.
According to the source, what was the significance of the network of unofficial collaborators (IMs)?
Answer: A crucial instrument of repression and a pillar of the one-party state's power.
The network of unofficial collaborators (IMs) was considered a crucial instrument of repression and a vital pillar supporting the East German one-party state's power.
The IM network's operations outside of East Germany are described in the source as:
Answer: Almost exclusively domestic in nature, with limited surviving information regarding foreign activities.
The IM network's operations were predominantly domestic within East Germany, with comparatively little documented information available regarding activities abroad.
What were the typical subjects of reports filed by Informal Collaborators?
Answer: Observations on the behavior of individuals within their domestic or professional spheres.
Reports submitted by Informal Collaborators typically focused on observing and documenting the behavior of individuals within their immediate domestic or professional environments.
Before 1968, East German unofficial collaborators were referred to as "Vertrauensmänner" (V-Männer).
Answer: False
Prior to 1968, the term used for unofficial collaborators was 'Geheimer Informator' (Secret Informer), not 'Vertrauensmänner' (V-Männer).
Which term was used for unofficial collaborators in East Germany *before* 1968?
Answer: Geheimer Informator (Secret Informer)
Prior to 1968, the term used for unofficial collaborators was 'Geheimer Informator' (Secret Informer).
Which historical event led to a steep increase in the number of IMs in East Germany?
Answer: The aftermath of the 1953 uprising and the construction of the Berlin Wall
The number of IMs rose most steeply in the aftermath of the 1953 uprising and during the construction of the Berlin Wall.
The total number of individuals who ever worked as unofficial collaborators for the Stasi throughout its existence is estimated to be around 189,000.
Answer: False
While 189,000 is an estimate for a specific period (1989), the estimated total number of individuals who worked as unofficial collaborators throughout the Stasi's entire existence is approximately 624,000.
Helmut Müller-Enbergs' 2010 study suggested a lower number of IMs in 1989 than the Stasi's internal figures for 1988.
Answer: False
Helmut Müller-Enbergs' 2010 study estimated approximately 189,000 IMs in 1989, which is higher than the Stasi's internal figure of approximately 110,000 IMs for 1988.
Criticisms of Helmut Müller-Enbergs' higher IM figures suggest they might be accurate because they meticulously excluded anyone who never reported information.
Answer: False
Criticisms suggest Müller-Enbergs' figures might be inflated because they could include individuals counted multiple times or those who never actually reported information, contrary to meticulous exclusion.
The Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Records (BStU) disputes Helmut Müller-Enbergs' figure of 189,000 IMs.
Answer: False
Contrary to the statement, the Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Records (BStU) continues to accept Helmut Müller-Enbergs' figure of 189,000 IMs.
The BStU estimates that around 10,000 Stasi IMs operated in West Germany and West Berlin.
Answer: False
The BStU estimates that between 3,000 and 3,500 Stasi IMs operated in West Germany and West Berlin, not approximately 10,000.
The concentration of Informal Collaborators was relatively uniform across all regions of East Germany.
Answer: False
The concentration of Informal Collaborators varied significantly across East German regions, with some areas having much higher densities than others.
Approximately 83% of Informal Collaborators in East Germany were female.
Answer: False
Contrary to the statement, approximately 83% of Informal Collaborators in East Germany were male.
On average, an informal collaborator provided reports to the Stasi for less than two years.
Answer: False
On average, an informal collaborator provided reports to the Stasi for a duration of six to ten years, significantly longer than the period stated in the question.
What was the estimated *total* number of individuals who worked for the Stasi as unofficial collaborators throughout its entire existence?
Answer: Roughly 624,000
Throughout its lifetime, the Stasi had approximately 624,000 unofficial collaborators.
What criticism has been raised regarding Helmut Müller-Enbergs' higher estimates for the number of IMs?
Answer: The estimates may encompass individuals counted multiple times or those who never actively reported information.
A primary criticism is that Müller-Enbergs' higher figures might include individuals counted multiple times or those who never actively reported information, potentially inflating the count.
According to the BStU, how many Stasi IMs were estimated to be operating in West Germany and West Berlin?
Answer: Between 3,000 and 3,500
The BStU estimates that between 3,000 and 3,500 Stasi IMs operated in West Germany and West Berlin.
Which regions in East Germany reportedly had the *lowest* concentrations of IMs?
Answer: Berlin, Halle, and Leipzig
Regions such as Berlin, Halle, and Leipzig were reportedly characterized by the lowest concentrations of unofficial collaborators (IMs).
What demographic characteristic was most prominent among East German IMs?
Answer: Predominantly male
In terms of gender demographics, unofficial collaborators (IMs) in East Germany were predominantly male.
The 25-40 age group was notable among IMs because:
Answer: It was particularly well-represented, exceeding its proportion in the general population.
The 25-40 age cohort was notably well-represented among IMs, comprising a larger proportion of collaborators than their share in the general population.
What was the average duration an individual served as an informal collaborator, providing reports?
Answer: Between six and ten years
On average, an informal collaborator provided reports to the Stasi for a duration of six to ten years.
"Auskunftspersonen" (AKPs) were high-ranking officials used by the Stasi to manage informant networks.
Answer: False
'Auskunftspersonen' (AKPs) were informants utilized in residential areas to gather information about neighbors, often concealing their role by posing as representatives of local authorities or other official bodies, rather than high-ranking officials managing networks.
Official partners of the Stasi were typically low-level employees tasked with minor information gathering.
Answer: False
Official partners of the Stasi typically held key positions, often leadership roles, within businesses and state institutions, and were expected to provide information and follow Stasi directives.
IMAs (Unofficial collaborators with special tasks) were primarily used for domestic surveillance within East German cities.
Answer: False
IMAs (Unofficial collaborators with special tasks) were primarily employed for offensive operations targeting West Germany, including planting stories in Western media, rather than for domestic surveillance within East German cities.
IMBs (Unofficial collaborators with enemy-connections) were low-level informants with limited Stasi confidence.
Answer: False
IMBs (Unofficial collaborators with enemy-connections) were considered particularly important, enjoyed the Stasi's confidence, and had direct contact with individuals classified as hostile, contrary to being low-level informants with limited confidence.
IMEs were utilized for their specialist skills, such as handwriting analysis or toxicology, for surveillance and investigations.
Answer: True
IMEs (Unofficial collaborators in special deployment) were indeed employed by the Stasi for specialized tasks requiring unique expertise, such as forensic analysis, and for conducting investigations.
IMKs (Unofficial collaborators for Protection from Conspiracies) were mainly responsible for recruiting new informants.
Answer: False
IMKs (Unofficial collaborators for Protection from Conspiracies) were primarily utilized for logistical support, such as establishing safe houses and providing communication channels, rather than for recruiting new informants.
IMSs (Unofficial collaborators for Political-operative Penetration) operated in security-related areas and constituted the largest category under Mielke's classification.
Answer: True
IMSs operated in security-sensitive areas, reporting on behavior to identify potential threats, and indeed constituted the largest category under Erich Mielke's classification system.
GMSs (Social Security Employees) were primarily tasked with direct operations against perceived enemies of the state.
Answer: False
GMSs (Social Security Employees), who held leading positions in the economy and administration, were primarily tasked with information retrieval and assisting other IMs, but they generally did not participate directly in operations against perceived enemies of the state.
What type of informant did the Stasi utilize in residential areas, often posing as officials to gather information?
Answer: Auskunftspersonen (AKPs)
In residential areas, the Stasi utilized 'Auskunftspersonen' (AKPs) for information gathering, often posing as officials to encourage neighbors to speak.
"Official partners" of the Stasi typically held what kind of positions?
Answer: Key positions, frequently leadership roles, within businesses and institutions.
Official partners of the Stasi typically occupied key positions, often leadership roles, within businesses, state institutions, and social organizations.
The role of an IMA (Unofficial collaborator with special tasks) primarily involved:
Answer: Planting stories and conducting operations in West Germany.
The primary responsibilities of an IMA involved offensive operations targeting West Germany, such as planting stories in media outlets.
Which category of IM was described as particularly important, enjoying the Stasi's confidence and having direct contact with classified hostile individuals?
Answer: IMB (Unofficial collaborator with enemy-connections)
IMBs (Unofficial collaborators with enemy-connections) were considered particularly important due to their trust from the Stasi and direct contact with hostile individuals.
The primary function of IMS (Unofficial collaborators for Political-operative Penetration) was to:
Answer: Operate within security-sensitive areas, reporting observed behavior to preempt suspicious activities.
IMSs primarily functioned by operating in security-sensitive areas and reporting observed behavior to identify and prevent suspicious activities.
A sense of duty to defend the GDR was never cited as a motivation for becoming an Informal Collaborator.
Answer: False
A sense of duty to defend the GDR was indeed cited as a motivation for becoming an Informal Collaborator, alongside other factors such as political conviction or pressure.
The opening of Stasi archives led to widespread celebration and reconciliation among former East Germans.
Answer: False
The opening of Stasi archives resulted in significant personal tragedies and the breakdown of relationships due to the revelation of collaborator identities, rather than widespread celebration and reconciliation.
Refusing further collaboration with the Stasi guaranteed that former IMs faced no negative consequences.
Answer: False
Refusing further collaboration with the Stasi did not guarantee freedom from negative consequences; it could lead to employment destruction and Zersetzung measures.
The moral evaluation of collaboration with the Stasi is straightforward due to the clear-cut nature of the collaborators' actions.
Answer: False
The moral evaluation of collaboration with the Stasi is complex and difficult due to the varied circumstances and motivations behind individuals' involvement, rather than being straightforward.
Which of the following was cited as a motivation for becoming an Informal Collaborator?
Answer: Acting out of a sense of duty to defend the GDR.
A sense of duty to defend the GDR was cited as a motivation for becoming an Informal Collaborator, alongside other factors such as political conviction or personal gain.
What consequence could arise if a former IM refused further collaboration with the Stasi?
Answer: They might face employment destruction and Zersetzung measures.
Refusing further collaboration could lead to negative repercussions, including employment destruction and the application of Zersetzung measures.
The societal impact of opening the Stasi archives during German reunification primarily involved:
Answer: The revelation of collaborator identities, resulting in personal tragedies and relationship breakdowns.
The opening of the Stasi archives primarily led to the revelation of collaborator identities, causing significant personal tragedies and the breakdown of relationships.