Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



Bicameral Legislatures: The Role and Evolution of Upper Houses

At a Glance

Title: Bicameral Legislatures: The Role and Evolution of Upper Houses

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Foundational Concepts of Bicameralism: 4 flashcards, 5 questions
  • Historical Evolution of Upper Houses: 7 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Powers and Functions of Upper Houses: 16 flashcards, 23 questions
  • Membership, Representation, and Structure: 11 flashcards, 24 questions
  • Abolition and Reform of Upper Houses: 5 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Global Naming Conventions for Upper Houses: 9 flashcards, 14 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 52
  • True/False Questions: 43
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 44
  • Total Questions: 87

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Bicameral Legislatures: The Role and Evolution of Upper Houses

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Upper house" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Bicameral Legislatures: The Role and Evolution of Upper Houses

Study Guide: Bicameral Legislatures: The Role and Evolution of Upper Houses

Foundational Concepts of Bicameralism

An upper house is typically larger in membership and possesses more power than a lower house.

Answer: False

Contrary to the statement, an upper house is generally characterized by a smaller membership and often possesses more restricted powers compared to its lower house counterpart.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the number of members in an upper house generally compare to a lower house?: An upper house typically has fewer members or seats than the lower house. However, there are notable exceptions, such as the United Kingdom parliament, where the House of Lords has a larger membership than the House of Commons.
  • How does an upper house typically compare to a lower house in terms of size and power?: Generally, the house formally designated as the upper house is smaller in terms of its membership and often possesses more restricted power compared to the lower house. This distinction in size and authority is a defining characteristic of bicameral systems.

A legislature composed of only one house is known as bicameral.

Answer: False

A legislature consisting of a single house is termed unicameral, whereas a bicameral system denotes a legislative body with two distinct chambers.

Related Concepts:

  • What term describes a legislature composed of only one house?: A legislature that consists of only one house, and therefore lacks both an upper and a lower house, is described as unicameral. Unicameral systems are simpler in structure, having a single legislative body.

What is an upper house in the context of a legislature?

Answer: One of two chambers that constitute a bicameral legislature.

Related Concepts:

  • What is an upper house in the context of a legislature?: An upper house is one of two chambers that constitute a bicameral legislature, with the other chamber being known as the lower house. Bicameralism refers to a legislative body having two houses or chambers, which is a common structure in many democratic governments.

How does an upper house typically compare to a lower house in terms of its membership and power?

Answer: It is generally smaller in membership and often possesses more restricted power.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the number of members in an upper house generally compare to a lower house?: An upper house typically has fewer members or seats than the lower house. However, there are notable exceptions, such as the United Kingdom parliament, where the House of Lords has a larger membership than the House of Commons.
  • How does an upper house typically compare to a lower house in terms of size and power?: Generally, the house formally designated as the upper house is smaller in terms of its membership and often possesses more restricted power compared to the lower house. This distinction in size and authority is a defining characteristic of bicameral systems.

What term describes a legislative body that consists of only one house?

Answer: Unicameral

Related Concepts:

  • What term describes a legislature composed of only one house?: A legislature that consists of only one house, and therefore lacks both an upper and a lower house, is described as unicameral. Unicameral systems are simpler in structure, having a single legislative body.

Historical Evolution of Upper Houses

The English Parliament clearly separated into two distinct chambers, the House of Lords and the House of Commons, around 1341.

Answer: True

Historical records indicate that the English Parliament formally bifurcated into the House of Lords and the House of Commons approximately in 1341, during the reign of King Edward III.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the English Parliament clearly separate into two distinct chambers, and what were they?: The English Parliament clearly separated into two distinct chambers around 1341, during the reign of King Edward III. These two chambers were the House of Lords, composed of archbishops, bishops, abbots, and nobility, and the House of Commons, which consisted of representatives from the shires and boroughs.

Spain's bicameral system began to evolve with the adoption of the Bayonne Statute in 1808, and its upper house was named the Senate with the constitution of 1837.

Answer: True

Spain's bicameral legislative structure indeed commenced its evolution with the Bayonne Statute in 1808, and the upper chamber was formally designated as the Senate under the constitution of 1837.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Spain's bicameral legislative system evolve in the 19th century?: Spain's bicameral system began to evolve with the adoption of the Bayonne Statute in 1808 and a liberal constitution in 1812 during resistance to Napoleonic invasions. In 1834, Queen Maria Christina established the House of Peers alongside the Deputies of the Realm, which was later named the Senate with the constitution of 1837. This upper house included royal princes, hereditary nobility, clergy, and appointed members based on population. The Spanish upper house was suppressed in 1923, and an elected regional chamber was established in 1977.

Portugal's Chamber of Most Worthy Peers, established in 1826, had its 90 members elected by popular vote.

Answer: False

The 90 members of Portugal's Chamber of Most Worthy Peers, established in 1826, were not popularly elected but were instead nominated by the monarch.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Chamber of Most Worthy Peers' in Portugal, and how were its members chosen?: The Chamber of Most Worthy Peers was established in Portugal in 1826 as the upper house of the Cortes Gerais, following the adoption of the constitution of 1822. Its 90 members were nominated by the monarch. This chamber was part of Portugal's legislative structure during a period of liberal wars.

After gaining independence in 1831, Belgium's Senate members were entirely appointed by the king.

Answer: False

Following its independence in 1831, Belgium's Senate members were selected through a hybrid system, involving both royal appointment and election by local authorities, not solely by the king.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Belgium establish its Senate after gaining independence from the Netherlands?: After gaining independence from the Netherlands in 1831, Belgium adopted a constitution that included a Senate. The members of this Senate were chosen through a mixed system, being partially appointed by the king and partially elected by local authorities.

Imperial Japan's House of Peers, established with the Meiji Constitution in 1889, was modeled after the British House of Lords.

Answer: False

Imperial Japan's House of Peers, instituted by the Meiji Constitution in 1889, was modeled after the Prussian House of Lords, not the British House of Lords.

Related Concepts:

  • Which countries modeled their upper houses after the Prussian House of Lords in the 19th century?: In the 19th century, the Landtag of Prussia had a Prussian House of Lords alongside its House of Representatives from 1850 onward. Imperial Japan, with its first modern Meiji Constitution in 1889, modeled its House of Peers after the Prussian House of Lords.

With the 1947 constitution, Japan's House of Peers was replaced by the House of Councillors, modeled after the United States Senate.

Answer: True

The 1947 Japanese constitution indeed replaced the Imperial House of Peers with the House of Councillors, which was designed with the United States Senate as its structural model.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Japan's upper house change with its 1947 constitution?: With the adoption of the 1947 constitution, Imperial Japan's House of Peers, which was modeled after the Prussian House of Lords, was replaced by the House of Councillors. This new upper house was modeled after the United States Senate, reflecting a shift in legislative structure.

Which historical body is identified as the first upper house of a bicameral legislature as understood today?

Answer: The medieval House of Lords in England.

Related Concepts:

  • Where did the concept of an upper house originate historically?: The concept of an upper house has ancient roots, with the senate of the ancient Roman kingdom (established around 755 BC) serving as an early assembly of aristocrats advising the king. However, the first upper house of a bicameral legislature, as we understand it today, was the medieval House of Lords in England.

Around what year did the English Parliament clearly separate into the House of Lords and the House of Commons?

Answer: 1341

Related Concepts:

  • When did the English Parliament clearly separate into two distinct chambers, and what were they?: The English Parliament clearly separated into two distinct chambers around 1341, during the reign of King Edward III. These two chambers were the House of Lords, composed of archbishops, bishops, abbots, and nobility, and the House of Commons, which consisted of representatives from the shires and boroughs.

In Spain, when did Queen Maria Christina establish the House of Peers, which was later named the Senate?

Answer: 1834

Related Concepts:

  • How did Spain's bicameral legislative system evolve in the 19th century?: Spain's bicameral system began to evolve with the adoption of the Bayonne Statute in 1808 and a liberal constitution in 1812 during resistance to Napoleonic invasions. In 1834, Queen Maria Christina established the House of Peers alongside the Deputies of the Realm, which was later named the Senate with the constitution of 1837. This upper house included royal princes, hereditary nobility, clergy, and appointed members based on population. The Spanish upper house was suppressed in 1923, and an elected regional chamber was established in 1977.

How were the 90 members of Portugal's Chamber of Most Worthy Peers chosen when it was established in 1826?

Answer: They were nominated by the monarch.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Chamber of Most Worthy Peers' in Portugal, and how were its members chosen?: The Chamber of Most Worthy Peers was established in Portugal in 1826 as the upper house of the Cortes Gerais, following the adoption of the constitution of 1822. Its 90 members were nominated by the monarch. This chamber was part of Portugal's legislative structure during a period of liberal wars.

After gaining independence in 1831, how were members of Belgium's Senate chosen?

Answer: Through a mixed system of royal appointment and local election.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Belgium establish its Senate after gaining independence from the Netherlands?: After gaining independence from the Netherlands in 1831, Belgium adopted a constitution that included a Senate. The members of this Senate were chosen through a mixed system, being partially appointed by the king and partially elected by local authorities.

What replaced Imperial Japan's House of Peers with the adoption of the 1947 constitution?

Answer: The House of Councillors.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Japan's upper house change with its 1947 constitution?: With the adoption of the 1947 constitution, Imperial Japan's House of Peers, which was modeled after the Prussian House of Lords, was replaced by the House of Councillors. This new upper house was modeled after the United States Senate, reflecting a shift in legislative structure.
  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Japan and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Japan is 'Sangiin,' which translates to 'House of Councillors.' This chamber was established after 1947, replacing the former House of Peers.

Powers and Functions of Upper Houses

In a parliamentary system, an upper house typically holds significantly more power than the lower house, especially regarding fiscal policy.

Answer: False

In parliamentary systems, an upper house generally possesses substantially less power than the lower house, particularly concerning fiscal policy, which is typically the exclusive domain of the lower chamber.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the typical power differences for an upper house in a parliamentary system compared to a lower house?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house typically holds significantly less power than the lower house. It often votes on only limited legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments, and usually cannot initiate most types of legislation, especially those concerning supply, money, or fiscal policy. Furthermore, it generally cannot vote a motion of no confidence against the government, or such an action is far less common than in the lower house.
  • What specific legislative matters might an upper house in a parliamentary system be limited to?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house may be limited to voting on specific legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments. This means its role in shaping the majority of laws is often restricted, focusing instead on foundational legal changes.
  • Can an upper house in a parliamentary system typically initiate legislation related to money or fiscal policy?: No, an upper house in a parliamentary system typically cannot initiate most kinds of legislation, especially those pertaining to supply, money, or fiscal policy. These financial matters are usually the exclusive domain of the lower house, which is considered to be more directly representative of the populace.

An upper house in a parliamentary system generally cannot vote a motion of no confidence against the government.

Answer: True

In parliamentary systems, the authority to initiate or vote on a motion of no confidence against the government is typically reserved for the lower house, making such actions rare or impossible for the upper house.

Related Concepts:

  • What role does an upper house play regarding motions of no confidence in a parliamentary system?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house generally cannot vote a motion of no confidence against the government, or such an act is much less common than in the lower house. The power to remove a government through a no-confidence vote typically rests with the lower house, which forms the government.
  • What are the typical power differences for an upper house in a parliamentary system compared to a lower house?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house typically holds significantly less power than the lower house. It often votes on only limited legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments, and usually cannot initiate most types of legislation, especially those concerning supply, money, or fiscal policy. Furthermore, it generally cannot vote a motion of no confidence against the government, or such an action is far less common than in the lower house.

In a presidential system, an upper house may have equal or nearly equal power with the lower house.

Answer: True

In contrast to parliamentary systems, an upper house within a presidential framework often holds powers that are equal or nearly equal to those of the lower house, and may possess distinct responsibilities.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the powers of an upper house differ in a presidential system compared to a parliamentary system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have equal or nearly equal power with the lower house, a significant difference from parliamentary systems where its powers are often more restricted. Additionally, it may possess specific powers not granted to the lower house, such as advising on executive appointments or ratifying treaties.
  • What unique powers might an upper house possess in a presidential system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have unique powers such as giving advice and consent to executive decisions, including the appointments of cabinet ministers, judges, or ambassadors. It may also hold the sole power to try impeachment cases against executive or judicial officials, following resolutions from the lower house, and the sole power to ratify treaties.
  • What specific powers are often granted to upper houses in presidential systems to compensate for other restrictions?: In presidential systems, upper houses are frequently granted specific powers to compensate for any restrictions they might face. These often include requiring their approval for executive appointments to the cabinet and other offices, and having the sole authority to give consent for the ratification and abrogation of foreign treaties.

Unique powers of an upper house in a presidential system include the sole power to ratify treaties and try impeachment cases.

Answer: True

In a presidential system, an upper house frequently holds unique powers, such as the exclusive authority to ratify international treaties and to conduct impeachment trials initiated by the lower house.

Related Concepts:

  • What unique powers might an upper house possess in a presidential system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have unique powers such as giving advice and consent to executive decisions, including the appointments of cabinet ministers, judges, or ambassadors. It may also hold the sole power to try impeachment cases against executive or judicial officials, following resolutions from the lower house, and the sole power to ratify treaties.
  • What specific powers are often granted to upper houses in presidential systems to compensate for other restrictions?: In presidential systems, upper houses are frequently granted specific powers to compensate for any restrictions they might face. These often include requiring their approval for executive appointments to the cabinet and other offices, and having the sole authority to give consent for the ratification and abrogation of foreign treaties.
  • How do the powers of an upper house differ in a presidential system compared to a parliamentary system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have equal or nearly equal power with the lower house, a significant difference from parliamentary systems where its powers are often more restricted. Additionally, it may possess specific powers not granted to the lower house, such as advising on executive appointments or ratifying treaties.

In a semi-presidential system like France, the Government cannot legislate normal laws without the Senate's agreement.

Answer: False

In a semi-presidential system such as France, the Government retains the capacity to legislate normal laws even without the explicit agreement of the Senate, as stipulated by Article 45 of the constitution.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the characteristics of an upper house's power in a semi-presidential system?: In a semi-presidential system, an upper house may have less power than the lower house, as seen in France where the Government can legislate normal laws without the Senate's agreement (Article 45 of the constitution). However, it may have equal power to the lower house regarding the constitution or territorial collectivities, and while it may not vote a motion of no confidence, it can investigate State cases and propose bills for the lower house's consideration.

In parliamentary systems, the upper house's primary function is often described as a 'house of review' to scrutinize legislation.

Answer: True

The upper house in parliamentary systems frequently functions as a 'house of review,' primarily tasked with scrutinizing legislation passed by the lower house and proposing amendments to enhance its quality.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary function of an upper house in a parliamentary system, often described as a 'house of review'?: In parliamentary systems, the upper house is frequently seen as an advisory body or a 'house of review' chamber. Its primary function is to scrutinize legislation that may have been drafted too quickly in the lower house and to suggest amendments, even though the lower house may ultimately reject these suggestions.
  • What specific legislative matters might an upper house in a parliamentary system be limited to?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house may be limited to voting on specific legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments. This means its role in shaping the majority of laws is often restricted, focusing instead on foundational legal changes.

The Italian Senate exemplifies 'perfect bicameralism' because it possesses the same powers as its lower counterpart.

Answer: True

The Italian Senate is a prime example of 'perfect bicameralism,' as it holds legislative powers identical to those of the Chamber of Deputies, requiring mutual consent for legislation and government formation.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the Italian Senate exemplify 'perfect bicameralism' in a parliamentary system?: The Italian Senate is a notable exception in parliamentary systems because it possesses the same powers as its lower counterpart, a characteristic known as 'perfect bicameralism' or 'equal bicameralism.' Any law can be initiated in either house and must be approved in the same form by both, and the government requires the consent of both houses to remain in office.

Under the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, the British House of Lords gained the power to prevent the passage of all bills indefinitely.

Answer: False

The Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 significantly curtailed the British House of Lords' power, limiting its ability to delay most bills to a maximum of one year, and money bills to one month, rather than granting indefinite veto power.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 affect the power of the House of Lords to delay legislation?: Under the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, the British House of Lords can no longer prevent the passage of most bills. However, it retains the power to delay the passage of a bill with which it disagrees for up to one year, while economic bills can only be delayed for one month. This allows for further debate and reconsideration.

The British House of Lords is sometimes seen as having a special role in safeguarding the uncodified UK Constitution and civil liberties.

Answer: True

Beyond its legislative review function, the British House of Lords is often regarded as having a crucial role in protecting the uncodified Constitution of the United Kingdom and upholding civil liberties against potentially hasty legislative changes.

Related Concepts:

  • What special role is sometimes attributed to the British House of Lords regarding the UK Constitution?: The British House of Lords is sometimes seen as having a special role in safeguarding the uncodified Constitution of the United Kingdom and important civil liberties against ill-considered changes. This function highlights its role as a check on the power of the elected lower house.
  • What is the role of the British House of Lords as a revising chamber?: The British House of Lords serves as a revising chamber, scrutinizing legislation that originates in the House of Commons. Its role is to debate bills, propose amendments, and ensure thorough consideration of proposed laws, although its power to prevent passage is limited.

An upper house without an absolute veto has no means to influence legislation.

Answer: False

Even without an absolute veto, an upper house can significantly influence legislation by delaying bills, prompting reconsideration by the lower chamber, or causing controversial measures to be abandoned.

Related Concepts:

  • Besides a formal veto, how can an upper house in a parliamentary system influence or defeat legislation?: Even without an absolute veto, an upper house in a parliamentary system can influence or defeat legislation by providing the lower chamber an opportunity to reconsider or abandon a controversial measure. It can also delay a bill, potentially causing it to miss the legislative schedule or to be postponed until a new lower house, elected after a general election, no longer wishes to proceed with it.

In recent times, there has been a general trend in parliamentary systems to strengthen the powers of upper houses.

Answer: False

The prevailing trend in contemporary parliamentary systems has been a weakening of upper house powers relative to their lower counterparts, with some even facing abolition or reduced legislative authority.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the general trend regarding the powers of upper houses in parliamentary systems in recent times?: In recent times, there has been a general trend in parliamentary systems to weaken the powers of upper houses relative to their lower counterparts. This has led to some upper houses being fully abolished, while others have had their powers reduced through constitutional or legislative amendments. Additionally, conventions have developed that discourage upper houses from obstructing government business for frivolous or partisan reasons.

Upper houses in parliamentary systems typically have less power over secondary or delegated legislation than over primary legislation.

Answer: False

While generally subordinate regarding primary legislation, upper houses in parliamentary systems may possess greater power, including the capacity to fully veto, secondary or delegated legislation, which are laws made by executive bodies.

Related Concepts:

  • How do upper houses in parliamentary systems handle secondary or delegated legislation?: Although typically constitutionally subordinate to the lower house regarding primary legislation, upper houses in parliamentary systems may possess greater power over the passage of secondary or delegated legislation. For instance, both the German Bundesrat and the British House of Lords have the capacity to fully veto delegated legislation, which refers to laws made by executive bodies under powers granted by primary legislation.

In a parliamentary system, which of the following legislative matters is an upper house typically limited to voting on?

Answer: Constitutional amendments.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific legislative matters might an upper house in a parliamentary system be limited to?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house may be limited to voting on specific legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments. This means its role in shaping the majority of laws is often restricted, focusing instead on foundational legal changes.
  • What are the typical power differences for an upper house in a parliamentary system compared to a lower house?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house typically holds significantly less power than the lower house. It often votes on only limited legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments, and usually cannot initiate most types of legislation, especially those concerning supply, money, or fiscal policy. Furthermore, it generally cannot vote a motion of no confidence against the government, or such an action is far less common than in the lower house.
  • How do upper houses in parliamentary systems handle secondary or delegated legislation?: Although typically constitutionally subordinate to the lower house regarding primary legislation, upper houses in parliamentary systems may possess greater power over the passage of secondary or delegated legislation. For instance, both the German Bundesrat and the British House of Lords have the capacity to fully veto delegated legislation, which refers to laws made by executive bodies under powers granted by primary legislation.

What is a key difference in power for an upper house in a presidential system compared to a parliamentary system?

Answer: It may have equal or nearly equal power with the lower house.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the powers of an upper house differ in a presidential system compared to a parliamentary system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have equal or nearly equal power with the lower house, a significant difference from parliamentary systems where its powers are often more restricted. Additionally, it may possess specific powers not granted to the lower house, such as advising on executive appointments or ratifying treaties.
  • What unique powers might an upper house possess in a presidential system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have unique powers such as giving advice and consent to executive decisions, including the appointments of cabinet ministers, judges, or ambassadors. It may also hold the sole power to try impeachment cases against executive or judicial officials, following resolutions from the lower house, and the sole power to ratify treaties.
  • What specific powers are often granted to upper houses in presidential systems to compensate for other restrictions?: In presidential systems, upper houses are frequently granted specific powers to compensate for any restrictions they might face. These often include requiring their approval for executive appointments to the cabinet and other offices, and having the sole authority to give consent for the ratification and abrogation of foreign treaties.

Which of the following is a unique power an upper house might possess in a presidential system?

Answer: The sole power to ratify treaties.

Related Concepts:

  • What unique powers might an upper house possess in a presidential system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have unique powers such as giving advice and consent to executive decisions, including the appointments of cabinet ministers, judges, or ambassadors. It may also hold the sole power to try impeachment cases against executive or judicial officials, following resolutions from the lower house, and the sole power to ratify treaties.
  • How do the powers of an upper house differ in a presidential system compared to a parliamentary system?: In a presidential system, an upper house may have equal or nearly equal power with the lower house, a significant difference from parliamentary systems where its powers are often more restricted. Additionally, it may possess specific powers not granted to the lower house, such as advising on executive appointments or ratifying treaties.
  • What specific powers are often granted to upper houses in presidential systems to compensate for other restrictions?: In presidential systems, upper houses are frequently granted specific powers to compensate for any restrictions they might face. These often include requiring their approval for executive appointments to the cabinet and other offices, and having the sole authority to give consent for the ratification and abrogation of foreign treaties.

In a semi-presidential system like France, what is true regarding the Senate's power over normal laws?

Answer: The Government can legislate normal laws without the Senate's agreement.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the characteristics of an upper house's power in a semi-presidential system?: In a semi-presidential system, an upper house may have less power than the lower house, as seen in France where the Government can legislate normal laws without the Senate's agreement (Article 45 of the constitution). However, it may have equal power to the lower house regarding the constitution or territorial collectivities, and while it may not vote a motion of no confidence, it can investigate State cases and propose bills for the lower house's consideration.

In parliamentary systems, what is the primary function of an upper house, often described as a 'house of review'?

Answer: To scrutinize legislation and suggest amendments.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary function of an upper house in a parliamentary system, often described as a 'house of review'?: In parliamentary systems, the upper house is frequently seen as an advisory body or a 'house of review' chamber. Its primary function is to scrutinize legislation that may have been drafted too quickly in the lower house and to suggest amendments, even though the lower house may ultimately reject these suggestions.
  • What specific legislative matters might an upper house in a parliamentary system be limited to?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house may be limited to voting on specific legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments. This means its role in shaping the majority of laws is often restricted, focusing instead on foundational legal changes.

Which country's Senate is an example of 'perfect bicameralism' in a parliamentary system?

Answer: The Italian Senate.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the Italian Senate exemplify 'perfect bicameralism' in a parliamentary system?: The Italian Senate is a notable exception in parliamentary systems because it possesses the same powers as its lower counterpart, a characteristic known as 'perfect bicameralism' or 'equal bicameralism.' Any law can be initiated in either house and must be approved in the same form by both, and the government requires the consent of both houses to remain in office.

How do the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 affect the British House of Lords' power over most bills?

Answer: They limited the House of Lords' ability to prevent passage, allowing only a delay of up to one year for most bills.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 affect the power of the House of Lords to delay legislation?: Under the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, the British House of Lords can no longer prevent the passage of most bills. However, it retains the power to delay the passage of a bill with which it disagrees for up to one year, while economic bills can only be delayed for one month. This allows for further debate and reconsideration.
  • What is the role of the British House of Lords as a revising chamber?: The British House of Lords serves as a revising chamber, scrutinizing legislation that originates in the House of Commons. Its role is to debate bills, propose amendments, and ensure thorough consideration of proposed laws, although its power to prevent passage is limited.

What special role is sometimes attributed to the British House of Lords regarding the UK Constitution?

Answer: Safeguarding the uncodified Constitution and civil liberties.

Related Concepts:

  • What special role is sometimes attributed to the British House of Lords regarding the UK Constitution?: The British House of Lords is sometimes seen as having a special role in safeguarding the uncodified Constitution of the United Kingdom and important civil liberties against ill-considered changes. This function highlights its role as a check on the power of the elected lower house.
  • What is the role of the British House of Lords as a revising chamber?: The British House of Lords serves as a revising chamber, scrutinizing legislation that originates in the House of Commons. Its role is to debate bills, propose amendments, and ensure thorough consideration of proposed laws, although its power to prevent passage is limited.

Besides a formal veto, how can an upper house in a parliamentary system influence legislation?

Answer: By providing the lower chamber an opportunity to reconsider or abandon a controversial measure.

Related Concepts:

  • Besides a formal veto, how can an upper house in a parliamentary system influence or defeat legislation?: Even without an absolute veto, an upper house in a parliamentary system can influence or defeat legislation by providing the lower chamber an opportunity to reconsider or abandon a controversial measure. It can also delay a bill, potentially causing it to miss the legislative schedule or to be postponed until a new lower house, elected after a general election, no longer wishes to proceed with it.
  • How do upper houses in parliamentary systems handle secondary or delegated legislation?: Although typically constitutionally subordinate to the lower house regarding primary legislation, upper houses in parliamentary systems may possess greater power over the passage of secondary or delegated legislation. For instance, both the German Bundesrat and the British House of Lords have the capacity to fully veto delegated legislation, which refers to laws made by executive bodies under powers granted by primary legislation.

What has been the general trend regarding the powers of upper houses in parliamentary systems in recent times?

Answer: A general trend to weaken their powers relative to lower counterparts.

Related Concepts:

  • What has been the general trend regarding the powers of upper houses in parliamentary systems in recent times?: In recent times, there has been a general trend in parliamentary systems to weaken the powers of upper houses relative to their lower counterparts. This has led to some upper houses being fully abolished, while others have had their powers reduced through constitutional or legislative amendments. Additionally, conventions have developed that discourage upper houses from obstructing government business for frivolous or partisan reasons.
  • What specific legislative matters might an upper house in a parliamentary system be limited to?: In a parliamentary system, an upper house may be limited to voting on specific legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments. This means its role in shaping the majority of laws is often restricted, focusing instead on foundational legal changes.
  • How do upper houses in parliamentary systems handle secondary or delegated legislation?: Although typically constitutionally subordinate to the lower house regarding primary legislation, upper houses in parliamentary systems may possess greater power over the passage of secondary or delegated legislation. For instance, both the German Bundesrat and the British House of Lords have the capacity to fully veto delegated legislation, which refers to laws made by executive bodies under powers granted by primary legislation.

Regarding secondary or delegated legislation, what power might upper houses in parliamentary systems possess?

Answer: They may possess greater power, including the capacity to fully veto it.

Related Concepts:

  • How do upper houses in parliamentary systems handle secondary or delegated legislation?: Although typically constitutionally subordinate to the lower house regarding primary legislation, upper houses in parliamentary systems may possess greater power over the passage of secondary or delegated legislation. For instance, both the German Bundesrat and the British House of Lords have the capacity to fully veto delegated legislation, which refers to laws made by executive bodies under powers granted by primary legislation.

Membership, Representation, and Structure

Members of an upper house are always popularly elected in most countries.

Answer: False

Membership in an upper house is not universally determined by popular election; in many nations, members are selected through indirect election, ex officio appointments, or direct appointment.

Related Concepts:

  • How do members of an upper house typically gain their positions, beyond popular election?: In many countries, members of an upper house are not popularly elected. Instead, their membership may be indirect, ex officio (by virtue of holding another office), or by appointment. This method is often intended to create a chamber composed of experts or distinguished citizens who might not necessarily be chosen through direct elections.

Upper houses in Australia and its states are typically elected by proportional representation, while lower houses usually are not.

Answer: True

In Australia, upper houses at both federal and state levels commonly employ proportional representation for elections, a method that often contrasts with the simple majority systems used for lower house elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some alternative methods of electing members to an upper house compared to a lower house?: Members of an upper house may be elected using a different voting system than that employed for the lower house. For example, upper houses in Australia and its states are typically elected by proportional representation, while lower houses usually are not. This can lead to different political compositions and mandates for the two chambers.
  • What happened to Queensland's Legislative Council in Australia?: The Australian state of Queensland once had an appointed Legislative Council, which served as its upper house. However, this council was abolished in 1922, making Queensland unicameral. All other Australian states continue to maintain bicameral systems, though their upper house members are now directly elected.

In some bicameral systems, less populated regions may receive better representation in the lower house than in the upper house.

Answer: False

In many bicameral systems, less populated regions are often granted disproportionately better representation in the upper house to ensure their voice is heard, balancing the population-based representation of the lower house.

Related Concepts:

  • How is representation structured in some upper houses, particularly concerning less populated regions?: In some bicameral systems, less populated states, provinces, or administrative divisions may receive better representation in the upper house than in the lower house. This means that representation is not always intended to be proportional to the population, often aiming to ensure that smaller entities have a stronger voice in the legislature.

Members of an upper house often have shorter terms than those in the lower house and are always elected all at once.

Answer: False

Members of an upper house typically serve longer terms than their lower house counterparts, and their elections are frequently staggered, with only a portion of members elected at any given time, rather than all at once.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the typical term lengths for members of an upper house, and can they be dissolved?: Members of an upper house often have longer terms than those in the lower house, and in some cases, terms may even be for life. Additionally, members may be elected in portions for staggered terms rather than all at once. In many countries, the upper house cannot be dissolved at all, or can only be dissolved under more limited circumstances than the lower house, providing greater stability.

The British House of Lords is an exception to the general rule that an upper house has fewer members than the lower house.

Answer: True

The British House of Lords is indeed an exception to the general principle, as it possesses a larger membership than the House of Commons, which is the lower house of the UK Parliament.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the number of members in an upper house generally compare to a lower house?: An upper house typically has fewer members or seats than the lower house. However, there are notable exceptions, such as the United Kingdom parliament, where the House of Lords has a larger membership than the House of Commons.

An upper house usually has a lower age of candidacy requirement than the lower house.

Answer: False

Typically, an upper house imposes a higher age requirement for candidacy compared to the lower house, reflecting an expectation of greater experience or maturity among its members.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the usual age requirement for candidacy in an upper house?: An upper house usually has a higher age of candidacy requirement than the lower house. This often reflects an intention for the upper chamber to be composed of more experienced or seasoned individuals.

The 1999 constitutional standoff between the Labour Government and the House of Lords resulted in the complete expulsion of all hereditary peers.

Answer: False

The 1999 constitutional dispute between the Labour Government and the House of Lords did not lead to the complete expulsion of all hereditary peers; instead, the Weatherill Amendment preserved 92 hereditary peers within the chamber.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe an instance of a constitutional standoff between the British House of Lords and the House of Commons.: An example of a constitutional standoff occurred in 1999 when the Labour Government attempted to expel all hereditary peers from the House of Lords. The Lords responded by threatening to obstruct the government's entire legislative agenda, leading to negotiations between the Shadow Leader of the House, Viscount Cranborne, and the Labour Government. This resulted in the Weatherill Amendment to the House of Lords Act 1999, which preserved 92 hereditary peers in the chamber.

Members of the Canadian Senate are appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Answer: True

The members of the Canadian Senate are indeed appointed by the Governor General, acting on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, a system designed to ensure diverse representation and expertise.

Related Concepts:

  • How are members of the Canadian Senate chosen?: Members of the Senate of Canada are appointed by the Governor General, who acts on the advice of the Prime Minister. This appointment system is intended to bring in individuals with diverse expertise and experience, rather than relying solely on popular election.

The British House of Lords and the Japanese House of Peers both had entirely hereditary seats until the late 20th century.

Answer: False

While the British House of Lords retained hereditary seats until 1999, the Japanese House of Peers, which also had hereditary members, was abolished in 1947, making the statement that *both* had entirely hereditary seats until the late 20th century inaccurate.

Related Concepts:

  • What historical examples exist of upper houses with entirely hereditary seats?: Historically, some upper houses had seats that were entirely hereditary, meaning membership was passed down through families. Notable examples include the British House of Lords until 1999 and the Japanese House of Peers until its abolition in 1947.
  • How did Japan's upper house change with its 1947 constitution?: With the adoption of the 1947 constitution, Imperial Japan's House of Peers, which was modeled after the Prussian House of Lords, was replaced by the House of Councillors. This new upper house was modeled after the United States Senate, reflecting a shift in legislative structure.

All members of India's Rajya Sabha are nominated by the President of India.

Answer: False

The Rajya Sabha, India's upper house, primarily consists of members nominated by various states and union territories, with only 12 members nominated by the President of India.

Related Concepts:

  • How are members of the Rajya Sabha in India selected?: Members of the Rajya Sabha, which is India's upper house, are primarily nominated by various states and union territories. Additionally, 12 members are nominated by the President of India, ensuring a mix of elected and appointed representation.

Before the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, members of the United States Senate were chosen by state legislatures.

Answer: True

Prior to the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, United States Senators were indirectly elected by state legislatures, rather than through direct popular vote.

Related Concepts:

  • How were members of the United States Senate chosen before the Seventeenth Amendment?: Before the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, members of the United States Senate were chosen by state legislatures. This meant that senators were indirectly elected, representing the interests of their respective states rather than being directly chosen by popular vote.

The senates of Australia, Brazil, and the United States demonstrate disproportionate representation by allocating a fixed number of members from each state, regardless of the state's population.

Answer: True

The senates of Australia, Brazil, and the United States exemplify disproportionate representation by assigning an equal, fixed number of elected members to each state, irrespective of its population size, thereby ensuring regional equity.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the senates of Australia, Brazil, and the United States demonstrate disproportionate representation?: The senates of Australia, Brazil, and the United States demonstrate disproportionate representation because they allocate a fixed number of elected members from each state, regardless of the state's population. This structure ensures that smaller states have an equal voice to larger states in the upper chamber, balancing population-based representation in the lower house.

Beyond popular election, how do members of an upper house typically gain their positions in many countries?

Answer: Through indirect election, ex officio, or appointment.

Related Concepts:

  • How do members of an upper house typically gain their positions, beyond popular election?: In many countries, members of an upper house are not popularly elected. Instead, their membership may be indirect, ex officio (by virtue of holding another office), or by appointment. This method is often intended to create a chamber composed of experts or distinguished citizens who might not necessarily be chosen through direct elections.

How are upper houses in Australia and its states typically elected, differing from their lower houses?

Answer: By proportional representation.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some alternative methods of electing members to an upper house compared to a lower house?: Members of an upper house may be elected using a different voting system than that employed for the lower house. For example, upper houses in Australia and its states are typically elected by proportional representation, while lower houses usually are not. This can lead to different political compositions and mandates for the two chambers.
  • What happened to Queensland's Legislative Council in Australia?: The Australian state of Queensland once had an appointed Legislative Council, which served as its upper house. However, this council was abolished in 1922, making Queensland unicameral. All other Australian states continue to maintain bicameral systems, though their upper house members are now directly elected.

In some bicameral systems, how is representation structured concerning less populated regions in the upper house?

Answer: They receive better representation than in the lower house.

Related Concepts:

  • How is representation structured in some upper houses, particularly concerning less populated regions?: In some bicameral systems, less populated states, provinces, or administrative divisions may receive better representation in the upper house than in the lower house. This means that representation is not always intended to be proportional to the population, often aiming to ensure that smaller entities have a stronger voice in the legislature.

What is a common characteristic of term lengths for members of an upper house?

Answer: They often have longer terms, and may be elected in portions for staggered terms.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the typical term lengths for members of an upper house, and can they be dissolved?: Members of an upper house often have longer terms than those in the lower house, and in some cases, terms may even be for life. Additionally, members may be elected in portions for staggered terms rather than all at once. In many countries, the upper house cannot be dissolved at all, or can only be dissolved under more limited circumstances than the lower house, providing greater stability.

Which country's parliament is cited as an exception where the upper house has a larger membership than the lower house?

Answer: The United Kingdom.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the number of members in an upper house generally compare to a lower house?: An upper house typically has fewer members or seats than the lower house. However, there are notable exceptions, such as the United Kingdom parliament, where the House of Lords has a larger membership than the House of Commons.

What is the usual age requirement for candidacy in an upper house compared to a lower house?

Answer: It is usually higher.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the usual age requirement for candidacy in an upper house?: An upper house usually has a higher age of candidacy requirement than the lower house. This often reflects an intention for the upper chamber to be composed of more experienced or seasoned individuals.

What was the outcome of the 1999 constitutional standoff between the Labour Government and the House of Lords regarding hereditary peers?

Answer: The Weatherill Amendment preserved 92 hereditary peers in the chamber.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe an instance of a constitutional standoff between the British House of Lords and the House of Commons.: An example of a constitutional standoff occurred in 1999 when the Labour Government attempted to expel all hereditary peers from the House of Lords. The Lords responded by threatening to obstruct the government's entire legislative agenda, leading to negotiations between the Shadow Leader of the House, Viscount Cranborne, and the Labour Government. This resulted in the Weatherill Amendment to the House of Lords Act 1999, which preserved 92 hereditary peers in the chamber.

How are members of the Canadian Senate chosen?

Answer: They are appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Related Concepts:

  • How are members of the Canadian Senate chosen?: Members of the Senate of Canada are appointed by the Governor General, who acts on the advice of the Prime Minister. This appointment system is intended to bring in individuals with diverse expertise and experience, rather than relying solely on popular election.

Which of the following had entirely hereditary seats until 1947?

Answer: The Japanese House of Peers.

Related Concepts:

  • What historical examples exist of upper houses with entirely hereditary seats?: Historically, some upper houses had seats that were entirely hereditary, meaning membership was passed down through families. Notable examples include the British House of Lords until 1999 and the Japanese House of Peers until its abolition in 1947.

How are members of the Rajya Sabha in India primarily selected?

Answer: Primarily nominated by various states and union territories.

Related Concepts:

  • How are members of the Rajya Sabha in India selected?: Members of the Rajya Sabha, which is India's upper house, are primarily nominated by various states and union territories. Additionally, 12 members are nominated by the President of India, ensuring a mix of elected and appointed representation.

Before the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, how were members of the United States Senate chosen?

Answer: By state legislatures.

Related Concepts:

  • How were members of the United States Senate chosen before the Seventeenth Amendment?: Before the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, members of the United States Senate were chosen by state legislatures. This meant that senators were indirectly elected, representing the interests of their respective states rather than being directly chosen by popular vote.

The senates of Australia, Brazil, and the United States demonstrate disproportionate representation by doing what?

Answer: Allocating a fixed number of elected members from each state, regardless of population.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the senates of Australia, Brazil, and the United States demonstrate disproportionate representation?: The senates of Australia, Brazil, and the United States demonstrate disproportionate representation because they allocate a fixed number of elected members from each state, regardless of the state's population. This structure ensures that smaller states have an equal voice to larger states in the upper chamber, balancing population-based representation in the lower house.

Abolition and Reform of Upper Houses

Nebraska is the only US state with a unicameral legislature, achieved by abolishing its upper house in 1934.

Answer: False

Nebraska is indeed the sole U.S. state with a unicameral legislature, but this was achieved by abolishing its *lower* house in 1934, not its upper house.

Related Concepts:

  • Which US state is unique for having a unicameral legislature, and how did it achieve this?: Nebraska is the only state in the United States with a unicameral legislature. It achieved this by abolishing its lower house in 1934, while the Senate of Nebraska, which had previously functioned as the upper house, continued to assemble as the sole legislative body.

Queensland's Legislative Council, its upper house, was abolished in 1922, making the state unicameral.

Answer: True

Queensland, an Australian state, transitioned to a unicameral system in 1922 following the abolition of its appointed Legislative Council, which served as its upper house.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to Queensland's Legislative Council in Australia?: The Australian state of Queensland once had an appointed Legislative Council, which served as its upper house. However, this council was abolished in 1922, making Queensland unicameral. All other Australian states continue to maintain bicameral systems, though their upper house members are now directly elected.

The Senate of the Philippines was abolished from 1972 to 1987 and then re-instituted with a new constitution in 1987.

Answer: True

The Senate of the Philippines experienced periods of abolition, notably from 1972 to 1987, before being re-established as part of a bicameral Congress under the 1987 constitution.

Related Concepts:

  • When and why was the Senate of the Philippines abolished and restored?: The Senate of the Philippines was abolished and restored twice. It was first abolished from 1935 to 1945 when a unicameral National Assembly convened, and then re-instituted via a constitutional amendment in 1941. It was abolished again from 1972 to 1987 when Congress was closed and a new constitution instituted a unicameral Parliament, but it was re-instituted with the restoration of a bicameral Congress through the adoption of a new constitution in 1987.

In a referendum, the Irish public voted to abolish the Seanad Éireann, with Fianna Fáil being the only major party to support its retention.

Answer: False

The Irish public, in a referendum, voted by a narrow margin to *retain* the Seanad Éireann, contrary to the statement, with Fianna Fáil being the only major party advocating for its retention.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the Irish referendum on abolishing the Seanad Éireann?: A previous government of Ireland (the 31st Dáil) held a referendum on the abolition of its upper house, the Seanad Éireann. However, the Irish public voted by a narrow margin to retain it. Interestingly, both the conservative-leaning Fine Gael and left-leaning Sinn Féin supported the abolition, while the centrist Fianna Fáil was the only major party to support its retention.

Which of the following countries is listed as having abolished its upper house to adopt a unicameral system?

Answer: New Zealand.

Related Concepts:

  • List some countries that have abolished their upper houses to adopt unicameral systems.: Many jurisdictions have abolished their upper houses to adopt unicameral systems, including Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Mauritania, New Zealand, Peru, Sweden, Turkey, and Venezuela. Several Indian states, Brazilian states, and Canadian provinces, as well as Queensland in Australia, have also transitioned to unicameral legislatures.

How did Nebraska become the only US state with a unicameral legislature?

Answer: It abolished its lower house in 1934.

Related Concepts:

  • Which US state is unique for having a unicameral legislature, and how did it achieve this?: Nebraska is the only state in the United States with a unicameral legislature. It achieved this by abolishing its lower house in 1934, while the Senate of Nebraska, which had previously functioned as the upper house, continued to assemble as the sole legislative body.

When was Queensland's Legislative Council, its upper house, abolished?

Answer: 1922

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to Queensland's Legislative Council in Australia?: The Australian state of Queensland once had an appointed Legislative Council, which served as its upper house. However, this council was abolished in 1922, making Queensland unicameral. All other Australian states continue to maintain bicameral systems, though their upper house members are now directly elected.

The Senate of the Philippines was abolished and re-instituted during which two periods?

Answer: 1935-1945 and 1972-1987.

Related Concepts:

  • When and why was the Senate of the Philippines abolished and restored?: The Senate of the Philippines was abolished and restored twice. It was first abolished from 1935 to 1945 when a unicameral National Assembly convened, and then re-instituted via a constitutional amendment in 1941. It was abolished again from 1972 to 1987 when Congress was closed and a new constitution instituted a unicameral Parliament, but it was re-instituted with the restoration of a bicameral Congress through the adoption of a new constitution in 1987.

What was the outcome of the Irish referendum on abolishing the Seanad Éireann?

Answer: The public voted by a narrow margin to retain it.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the Irish referendum on abolishing the Seanad Éireann?: A previous government of Ireland (the 31st Dáil) held a referendum on the abolition of its upper house, the Seanad Éireann. However, the Irish public voted by a narrow margin to retain it. Interestingly, both the conservative-leaning Fine Gael and left-leaning Sinn Féin supported the abolition, while the centrist Fianna Fáil was the only major party to support its retention.

Global Naming Conventions for Upper Houses

The most common title for an upper house globally is 'Legislative Council'.

Answer: False

The most prevalent title for an upper house worldwide is 'Senate,' rather than 'Legislative Council,' which is used in specific jurisdictions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the most common title for an upper house globally?: By far the most common title for an upper house globally is 'Senate.' This term is widely used across various countries and political systems to designate the upper legislative chamber.
  • Name some countries or entities that use 'Legislative Council' as the title for their upper house.: The title 'Legislative Council' is used for upper houses in several Indian states, the Isle of Man, and every Australian state that maintains a bicameral system. This term signifies a legislative body, often with a specific role in reviewing or initiating laws.

Germany and Austria use the title 'Federal Council' (Bundesrat) for their upper houses.

Answer: True

Both Germany and Austria designate their upper legislative chambers as the 'Federal Council,' known as Bundesrat in German, reflecting their federal structures.

Related Concepts:

  • Which countries use 'Federal Council' or 'Federation Council' for their upper house?: Germany and Austria use the title 'Federal Council' (Bundesrat in German) for their upper houses, while Russia uses 'Federation Council.' These titles reflect the federal structure of these nations, where the upper chamber often represents the constituent states or regions.

The 'Council of States' is the title for the upper house in Switzerland and India.

Answer: True

The title 'Council of States' is indeed employed for the upper houses in both Switzerland and India, emphasizing their role in representing constituent states or cantons.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Council of States' in Switzerland and India?: The 'Council of States' is the title for the upper house in Switzerland and India (where it is known as the Rajya Sabha). This name emphasizes its role in representing the individual states or cantons within a federal system, ensuring their interests are heard at the national level.

The unique title for the upper house in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 'Dom naroda,' translates to 'House of Elders.'

Answer: False

The unique title for Bosnia and Herzegovina's upper house, 'Dom naroda,' translates to 'House of Peoples,' not 'House of Elders.'

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Bosnia and Herzegovina and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 'Dom naroda,' which translates to 'House of Peoples.' This name highlights its role in representing the different constituent peoples or ethnic groups within the country.

Japan's upper house, 'Sangiin,' translates to 'House of Representatives.'

Answer: False

Japan's upper house, 'Sangiin,' translates to 'House of Councillors,' distinguishing it from the 'House of Representatives,' which is the lower chamber.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Japan and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Japan is 'Sangiin,' which translates to 'House of Councillors.' This chamber was established after 1947, replacing the former House of Peers.

The 'Golaha Guurtida' in Somaliland translates to 'House of Elders.'

Answer: True

In Somaliland, the upper house is known as the 'Golaha Guurtida,' which accurately translates to 'House of Elders,' signifying a body of respected, experienced individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Somaliland and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Somaliland is 'Golaha Guurtida,' which translates to 'House of Elders.' This name suggests a body composed of respected, experienced individuals, often playing a role in traditional governance and conflict resolution.

Thailand's upper house, 'Wutthisapha,' translates to 'Senior Council' or 'Senate.'

Answer: True

Thailand's upper house, 'Wutthisapha,' is correctly translated as 'Senior Council' or 'Senate,' indicating a chamber composed of senior or experienced members.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Thailand and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Thailand is 'Wutthisapha,' which translates to 'Senior Council' or 'Senate.' This title implies a chamber composed of experienced or senior members, often with a role in reviewing legislation and providing stability.

What is the most common title for an upper house globally?

Answer: Senate.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the most common title for an upper house globally?: By far the most common title for an upper house globally is 'Senate.' This term is widely used across various countries and political systems to designate the upper legislative chamber.

Which countries use the title 'Federal Council' (Bundesrat) for their upper houses?

Answer: Germany and Austria.

Related Concepts:

  • Which countries use 'Federal Council' or 'Federation Council' for their upper house?: Germany and Austria use the title 'Federal Council' (Bundesrat in German) for their upper houses, while Russia uses 'Federation Council.' These titles reflect the federal structure of these nations, where the upper chamber often represents the constituent states or regions.

The 'Council of States' is the title for the upper house in which two countries?

Answer: Switzerland and India.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Council of States' in Switzerland and India?: The 'Council of States' is the title for the upper house in Switzerland and India (where it is known as the Rajya Sabha). This name emphasizes its role in representing the individual states or cantons within a federal system, ensuring their interests are heard at the national level.

What is the English translation of Bosnia and Herzegovina's upper house title, 'Dom naroda'?

Answer: House of Peoples.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Bosnia and Herzegovina and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 'Dom naroda,' which translates to 'House of Peoples.' This name highlights its role in representing the different constituent peoples or ethnic groups within the country.

What is the English translation for Japan's upper house, 'Sangiin'?

Answer: House of Councillors.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Japan and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Japan is 'Sangiin,' which translates to 'House of Councillors.' This chamber was established after 1947, replacing the former House of Peers.

The 'Golaha Guurtida' is the unique title for the upper house in which country?

Answer: Somaliland.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Somaliland and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Somaliland is 'Golaha Guurtida,' which translates to 'House of Elders.' This name suggests a body composed of respected, experienced individuals, often playing a role in traditional governance and conflict resolution.

What is the English translation for Thailand's upper house, 'Wutthisapha'?

Answer: Senior Council or Senate.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique title for the upper house in Thailand and its translation?: The unique title for the upper house in Thailand is 'Wutthisapha,' which translates to 'Senior Council' or 'Senate.' This title implies a chamber composed of experienced or senior members, often with a role in reviewing legislation and providing stability.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy