Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 did not significantly improve voting access for Americans.
Answer: False
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were landmark pieces of legislation that significantly dismantled discriminatory practices, thereby substantially improving voting access for many Americans, particularly African Americans.
Following the Fifteenth Amendment, African American men experienced a significant decrease in voter turnout in the South during Reconstruction.
Answer: False
The Fifteenth Amendment, ratified in 1870, granted voting rights to African American men. During the Reconstruction era, this led to high voter turnout among Black men in the South, often matching or exceeding white turnout in many areas.
After Reconstruction, Southern states implemented policies like poll taxes and literacy tests to suppress Black voters.
Answer: True
Following the Reconstruction era, Southern states enacted various measures, including poll taxes and literacy tests, designed to disenfranchise Black voters and circumvent the protections afforded by the Fifteenth Amendment.
The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 granted voting rights to Native Americans, overriding all previous Supreme Court decisions on the matter.
Answer: False
The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 was a significant step toward enfranchising Native Americans, but it did not override all previous Supreme Court decisions or immediately grant universal suffrage, as state laws still varied.
The Nineteenth Amendment, ratified in 1920, guarantees women the right to vote nationwide.
Answer: True
The ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920 marked the culmination of the women's suffrage movement, constitutionally securing the right to vote for women across the United States.
The Twenty-sixth Amendment lowered the voting age to 21 for all citizens.
Answer: False
The Twenty-sixth Amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age to 18 for all citizens, not 21.
Jim Crow laws enforced racial segregation and disenfranchised Black citizens primarily in the Northern United States.
Answer: False
Jim Crow laws were primarily enacted and enforced in the Southern United States from the late 19th to the mid-20th century, enforcing racial segregation and disenfranchising Black citizens.
Paramilitary groups like the White League were used during Reconstruction to support Black political participation.
Answer: False
Paramilitary groups such as the White League were employed during Reconstruction to disrupt Republican organizing and intimidate Black voters, thereby suppressing their political participation.
The Compromise of 1877 led to the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, ending federal protection for civil rights.
Answer: True
The Compromise of 1877 resulted in the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, effectively ending federal protection for civil rights and allowing for the re-establishment of white supremacy and disenfranchisement measures.
Between 1890 and 1910, Southern states adopted measures like poll taxes and literacy tests that increased Black political participation.
Answer: False
Between 1890 and 1910, Southern states implemented poll taxes, literacy tests, and other restrictive measures that drastically decreased, rather than increased, Black political participation.
The 'Eight Box Law' in South Carolina was designed to assist illiterate voters in casting their ballots correctly.
Answer: False
South Carolina's 'Eight Box Law' was designed as a voter suppression tool, making it difficult for illiterate voters, both Black and white, to cast their ballots correctly by requiring them to place votes into specific boxes.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to end discriminatory voting practices, with a key provision requiring federal 'pre-clearance' for voting law changes in certain states.
Answer: True
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to combat discriminatory voting practices. A crucial element was the pre-clearance requirement, mandating that jurisdictions with a history of discrimination seek federal approval before implementing changes to voting laws.
Which historical legislation significantly improved voting access for many Americans?
Answer: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were pivotal legislative achievements that dismantled discriminatory voting practices and significantly enhanced access to the ballot for numerous citizens.
How did the Fifteenth Amendment impact African American suffrage during the Reconstruction era?
Answer: It resulted in high voter turnout among African American men, often matching or exceeding White turnout.
The Fifteenth Amendment enabled high voter turnout among African American men during Reconstruction, with their participation levels frequently equaling or surpassing those of white voters in several Southern states.
Which of the following was a method used by Southern states after Reconstruction to suppress Black voters?
Answer: Using poll taxes and literacy tests.
Following Reconstruction, Southern states employed poll taxes and literacy tests as primary mechanisms to disenfranchise Black voters and circumvent the protections of the Fifteenth Amendment.
What was the effect of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 on Native American suffrage?
Answer: It was a significant step towards enfranchising Native Americans.
The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 represented a crucial advancement in Native American suffrage, although state-level barriers persisted for some time.
Which amendment ultimately prohibited poll taxes nationwide?
Answer: The Twenty-fourth Amendment
The Twenty-fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1964, abolished the poll tax as a requirement for voting in federal elections.
What was the culmination of the women's suffrage movement?
Answer: The ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment.
The ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920 marked the successful conclusion of the long-standing women's suffrage movement, guaranteeing women the right to vote.
What is the significance of the Twenty-sixth Amendment regarding voting age?
Answer: It lowered the voting age to 18 for all citizens.
The Twenty-sixth Amendment established the national voting age at 18, ensuring that citizens aged 18 and older have the right to vote.
Jim Crow laws, enforced from the late 19th to mid-20th century, primarily targeted which region of the United States?
Answer: The Southern United States.
Jim Crow laws, which enforced racial segregation and disenfranchisement, were predominantly enacted and enforced throughout the Southern United States during the late 19th and mid-20th centuries.
How did paramilitary groups contribute to voter suppression during Reconstruction?
Answer: By disrupting Republican organizing and intimidating Black voters.
Paramilitary groups during Reconstruction actively suppressed Black political participation by disrupting Republican activities and intimidating voters, thereby undermining the electoral process.
What was the consequence of the Compromise of 1877 regarding federal protection of civil rights in the South?
Answer: It led to the withdrawal of federal troops, ending protection for civil rights.
The Compromise of 1877 resulted in the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, effectively ending federal oversight and protection for civil rights, which facilitated the re-establishment of disenfranchisement policies.
Which of the following was NOT a measure used by Southern states between 1890 and 1910 to disenfranchise Black voters?
Answer: Automatic voter registration.
Automatic voter registration was not a measure used by Southern states between 1890 and 1910 to disenfranchise voters; rather, it is a modern reform aimed at increasing registration.
What was the purpose of South Carolina's 'Eight Box Law'?
Answer: To act as a voter suppression tool against illiterate voters.
South Carolina's 'Eight Box Law' was implemented to disenfranchise illiterate voters by requiring them to correctly place ballots into multiple designated boxes.
The Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) upheld the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act's enforcement formula.
Answer: False
In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the Supreme Court declared the coverage formula of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 unconstitutional, effectively weakening federal oversight of state voting laws that had a history of discrimination.
The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of poll taxes in the 1937 case Breedlove v. Suttles.
Answer: True
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of poll taxes in the 1937 case Breedlove v. Suttles, a stance that persisted until the Twenty-fourth Amendment prohibited them in federal elections.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that Ohio must stop purging infrequent voters from its rolls.
Answer: False
In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that Ohio could continue its practice of purging infrequent voters from its rolls, reversing a lower court decision and allowing states to remove voters who do not participate in federal elections for extended periods.
What was the key outcome of the Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County v. Holder (2013)?
Answer: It declared the enforcement formula of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) invalidated the coverage formula of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, thereby removing the requirement for certain states to obtain federal pre-clearance for changes to their voting laws.
What was the Supreme Court's 2018 ruling regarding Ohio's voter roll purges?
Answer: Ohio could continue purging infrequent voters from the rolls.
In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that Ohio could continue its practice of purging infrequent voters from voter rolls, reversing a lower court decision.
Voter suppression exclusively involves illegal actions aimed at preventing eligible citizens from voting.
Answer: False
Voter suppression encompasses a range of actions, both legal and illegal, designed to prevent eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote. Illegal actions include intimidation and coercion, while legal actions can involve restrictive registration deadlines or voter ID requirements.
Concerns over electoral integrity have historically been cited as justifications for voter restrictions in the U.S.
Answer: True
Proponents of voter restrictions frequently cite concerns about electoral integrity as a rationale for implementing measures such as voter ID laws or purges. However, critics argue that documented instances of voter fraud are rare and that these measures disproportionately disenfranchise eligible voters.
Poll taxes were primarily used in Northern states to disenfranchise poor voters.
Answer: False
Poll taxes were predominantly implemented in Southern states starting in the late 19th century, primarily serving to disenfranchise African Americans and poor whites.
Literacy tests were applied uniformly to all voters across the United States to ensure comprehension.
Answer: False
Literacy tests were often applied unevenly and discriminatorily, particularly in Southern states, to disenfranchise Black voters and poor whites, while exemptions were frequently granted to others.
Voter intimidation and coercion are considered illegal forms of voter suppression.
Answer: True
Voter intimidation and coercion are explicitly illegal tactics used to suppress voting, employing fear or duress to prevent eligible citizens from casting their ballots.
The 'caging lists' tactic involves mailing first-class mail marked 'return to sender' to challenge voter registrations.
Answer: False
The 'caging lists' tactic involves mailing first-class mail marked 'do not forward' to challenge voter registrations if the mail is returned as undeliverable, indicating the voter may no longer reside at that address.
Limitations on early voting have been used to suppress turnout, particularly among voters who utilize these options less frequently.
Answer: False
Limitations on early voting have been used to suppress turnout, particularly among minority voters who tend to utilize early voting options more frequently. Reducing early voting periods can disproportionately affect these groups.
Excessive lines at polling places can deter voters and are not considered a voter suppression tactic.
Answer: False
Excessive lines at polling places can deter voters, particularly those with limited time or resources, and are considered a tactic of voter suppression, often resulting from insufficient polling resources or deliberate delays.
Voting procedure disinformation involves providing voters with accurate information about election processes.
Answer: False
Voting procedure disinformation involves intentionally spreading false information about election processes, such as polling times, locations, or registration deadlines, to confuse and deter voters.
Candidate impersonation tactics involve spreading false information about candidates to mislead voters.
Answer: True
Candidate impersonation is a voter suppression tactic that uses fake communications, such as texts or videos, to spread false information about candidates, aiming to mislead voters and influence their electoral decisions.
Alabama's felony disenfranchisement law is criticized for disproportionately affecting African Americans.
Answer: True
Alabama's felony disenfranchisement law is criticized for its disproportionate impact on African Americans, with critics arguing it is rooted in historical practices designed to suppress non-white voters.
Georgia's 'exact match' policy for voter registration primarily flagged voters with common, easily verifiable names.
Answer: False
Georgia's 'exact match' policy for voter registration disproportionately flagged voters with common names or variations (like hyphens or suffixes), leading to the suspension of thousands of registrations, predominantly among minority voters.
What is the primary definition of voter suppression in the United States?
Answer: Legal and illegal actions preventing eligible citizens from voting.
Voter suppression encompasses a spectrum of legal and illegal actions intended to obstruct eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote, often targeting specific demographic groups.
Poll taxes, implemented primarily in Southern states starting in the 1890s, primarily disenfranchised which groups?
Answer: African Americans and poor whites.
Poll taxes were strategically employed in Southern states to disenfranchise African Americans and poor white citizens, effectively limiting their participation in the electoral process.
How were literacy tests often applied to disenfranchise voters?
Answer: They were often applied unevenly, with stricter tests for African Americans and exemptions for others.
Literacy tests were frequently administered in a discriminatory manner, imposing more rigorous standards on African Americans while offering exemptions to others, thereby serving as a tool for disenfranchisement.
Which of the following is an example of an illegal form of voter suppression?
Answer: Voter intimidation or coercion.
Voter intimidation and coercion are illegal methods used to suppress voting, employing threats or duress to prevent eligible citizens from casting their ballots.
What is the 'caging lists' tactic used in voter suppression?
Answer: Mailing first-class mail marked 'do not forward' to challenge registrations if returned.
The 'caging lists' tactic involves sending mail marked 'do not forward' to voters; if returned, it is used to challenge their registration, suggesting they are no longer at the address.
How have limitations on early voting been used as a suppression tactic?
Answer: By reducing early voting periods, particularly affecting minority voters who use them more.
Reducing early voting periods can suppress turnout, especially among minority voters who rely on these extended options, as seen in cases where such laws were found to have discriminatory intent.
How can excessive lines at polling places function as voter suppression?
Answer: By deterring voters, especially when caused by limiting voting machines or excessive challenges.
Excessive lines at polling places can deter voters, particularly those with time constraints, and are considered a suppression tactic often resulting from insufficient resources or deliberate delays.
What is the purpose of voting procedure disinformation?
Answer: To intentionally provide false information about when, where, or how to vote.
Voting procedure disinformation aims to mislead voters by providing incorrect information about election processes, potentially preventing them from casting valid ballots.
What tactic involves using fake communications like texts or videos to spread false information about a candidate?
Answer: Candidate impersonation.
Candidate impersonation is a voter suppression tactic that utilizes fabricated communications to disseminate false information about candidates, aiming to mislead the electorate.
What criticism has been leveled against Alabama's felony disenfranchisement law?
Answer: It disproportionately affects African Americans and is rooted in historical white supremacy.
Alabama's felony disenfranchisement law faces criticism for its disproportionate impact on African Americans and its historical roots in white supremacist efforts to suppress non-white voting.
Florida's 1998 voter purge, using database matching, accurately removed only ineligible voters.
Answer: False
Florida's 1998 voter purge, utilizing database matching, was criticized for wrongly removing eligible voters, including many whose names were similar to those of convicted felons, disproportionately affecting minority populations.
In Georgia's 2008 voter purges, reliance on Social Security data for verification was cited as a reason for wrongful removals.
Answer: True
Georgia's 2008 voter purges faced criticism, with the ACLU noting that reliance on Social Security data for verification led to the wrongful removal of thousands of registered voters, potentially violating federal laws.
Brooklyn's 2015-2016 voter purges disproportionately affected majority-Hispanic districts.
Answer: True
An analysis of Brooklyn's 2015-2016 voter purges, which removed over 120,000 voters, indicated a disproportionate impact on majority-Hispanic districts, although affected voters were later reinstated.
A federal appeals court found North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law to be discriminatory against African American voters.
Answer: True
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law, ruling that it was enacted with discriminatory intent against African American voters.
The 1838 Gallatin County Election Day Battle involved voter suppression based on political party affiliation.
Answer: False
The 1838 Gallatin County Election Day Battle was an instance of voter suppression based on religious or group affiliation, specifically targeting Mormons, rather than political party affiliation.
Conservative leader Paul Weyrich believed that increasing the voting populace would enhance electoral leverage.
Answer: False
Conservative leader Paul Weyrich expressed the view that reducing the voting populace would increase electoral leverage, stating, 'our leverage in the elections ... goes up as the voting populace goes down.'
In 1981, the RNC successfully challenged voter registrations in African-American neighborhoods, leading to their removal from rolls.
Answer: True
In 1981, the RNC challenged voter registrations in African-American neighborhoods based on returned mail, leading to the removal of voters from the rolls. This practice resulted in a consent decree prohibiting the RNC from similar actions.
The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal aimed to help Democratic voters secure transportation.
Answer: False
The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal involved Republican officials making hang-up calls to the Democratic Party's voter transportation lines, intending to hinder Democratic voters' access to polling places.
During the 2004 presidential election, Voters Outreach of America was accused of discarding Republican voter registration forms.
Answer: False
During the 2004 election, Voters Outreach of America was accused of collecting Republican registration forms while discarding Democratic ones, potentially preventing voters from being registered.
Michigan Republican state legislator John Pappageorge suggested suppressing the Detroit vote to improve election chances.
Answer: True
Michigan Republican state legislator John Pappageorge was quoted suggesting the need to suppress the vote in Detroit to improve election outcomes for his party.
In Ohio's 2004 election, tactics included creating long queues in wards leaning towards Republican candidates.
Answer: False
In Ohio's 2004 election, tactics included creating long queues in wards leaning towards John Kerry by reducing the number of voting machines and excessively challenging voters, which a federal court later found to be illegal.
Four Kerry campaign workers were convicted for slashing tires of vans intended for transporting Republican voters in Wisconsin.
Answer: True
Four employees of John Kerry's campaign were convicted for slashing the tires of vans rented by the Wisconsin Republican Party, which were intended for transporting voters and monitors.
During the 2006 Virginia Senate election, Democratic voters received calls falsely stating that voting would lead to arrest.
Answer: True
During the 2006 Virginia Senate election, documented incidents included phone calls to Democratic voters falsely informing them that voting would result in arrest, a tactic aimed at suppressing turnout.
The Obama campaign sought to stop a 'caging scheme' in Michigan in 2008 that used foreclosure lists to challenge voters.
Answer: True
The Obama campaign took action to halt an alleged 'caging scheme' in Michigan in 2008, which reportedly used foreclosure lists to challenge voters based on their addresses.
The ACLU of Michigan filed a lawsuit challenging a state law that automatically reinstated purged voter registrations.
Answer: False
The ACLU of Michigan filed a lawsuit challenging a state law that nullified voter registrations if voter ID cards were returned as undeliverable, rather than a law that automatically reinstated purged registrations.
During the 2008 Election Day incident in Philadelphia, members of the New Black Panther Party were accused of voter encouragement.
Answer: False
During the 2008 Election Day incident in Philadelphia, members of the New Black Panther Party were accused of voter intimidation, not encouragement, with one individual carrying a billy club near a polling place.
The Bob Ehrlich campaign in 2010 used Election Day robocalls to inform voters that polls had closed early.
Answer: True
The Bob Ehrlich campaign in 2010 employed Election Day robocalls that falsely informed voters that polls had closed early, a tactic aimed at suppressing turnout.
Paul Schurick, Ehrlich's campaign manager, was acquitted of charges related to the 2010 robocalls.
Answer: False
Paul Schurick, Ehrlich's campaign manager, was convicted of charges related to the 2010 robocalls, receiving penalties including home detention.
Montgomery County Republicans planned to move early-voting sites away from densely populated areas in 2015.
Answer: True
In 2015, Montgomery County Republicans proposed moving early-voting sites from densely populated areas to more sparsely populated, Republican-leaning locations, drawing accusations of voter suppression.
Kris Kobach's Documentary Proof of Citizenship law in Kansas was found to illegally refuse applications from U.S. citizens.
Answer: True
Kris Kobach's Documentary Proof of Citizenship law in Kansas was ruled illegal by a federal judge, who found it improperly refused over 31,000 applications from U.S. citizens.
A Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upheld North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law, finding it non-discriminatory.
Answer: False
A Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling struck down North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law, finding it was enacted with discriminatory intent against African American voters.
North Dakota's voter ID law requiring a residential address adversely affected Native American voters.
Answer: True
North Dakota's voter ID law, which required a residential address, disproportionately affected Native American voters, many of whom lacked such identification and were consequently denied the right to vote.
A federal judge found Wisconsin's voter ID law to be an effective deterrent against voter impersonation.
Answer: False
A federal judge found Wisconsin's voter ID law led to 'real incidents of disenfranchisement,' particularly in minority communities, and undermined election confidence, calling it 'a cure worse than the disease' due to the lack of evidence for widespread voter impersonation.
President Trump's Election Integrity Commission was led by Kris Kobach, known for advocating strict voter ID laws.
Answer: True
President Trump's Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity was indeed led by Kris Kobach, who was known for his advocacy of strict voter ID laws and the Crosscheck system, leading critics to suggest the commission's purpose was voter suppression.
The Crosscheck system, used by the Election Integrity Commission, was found to have a highly accurate algorithm for identifying double registrations.
Answer: False
The Crosscheck system, employed by the Election Integrity Commission, was found to have a flawed algorithm that generated numerous false positives, identifying approximately 200 inaccurate instances of double registration for every one legitimate case.
Alabama closed DMV offices more frequently in counties with low Black populations after the Shelby County v. Holder decision.
Answer: False
Following the Shelby County v. Holder decision, Alabama closed DMV offices more frequently in counties with high Black populations, raising concerns about voter access, particularly for obtaining required identification.
In Louisville, Georgia, Black senior citizens were prevented from boarding a bus for early voting due to claims of improper political activity.
Answer: True
In Louisville, Georgia, Black senior citizens participating in an early voting bus tour were prevented from boarding by a county clerk who cited 'political activity' rules, leading to accusations of voter suppression.
The Indiana NAACP and League of Women Voters sued Indiana to stop a law allowing voter purges without notification.
Answer: True
The Indiana NAACP and League of Women Voters filed a federal lawsuit in 2017 to challenge a state law that permitted voter purges without prior notification to the affected individuals.
Wisconsin's 2019 voter purges, pushed by WILL, were argued by critics to target voters in Republican-leaning areas.
Answer: False
Critics argued that Wisconsin's 2019 voter purges, initiated following a report from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) and pushed by the conservative group WILL, targeted voters in Democratic-leaning areas, not Republican-leaning ones.
Texas closed more voting places than any other Southern state in 2020 and limited absentee ballot drop-off locations.
Answer: True
In 2020, Texas led Southern states in closing voting places and implemented a limit of one absentee ballot drop-off location per county, actions that drew legal challenges and criticism for restricting voting access.
Arizona Representative John Kavanagh stated that voting 'quality' is more important than 'quantity' of voters.
Answer: True
Arizona Representative John Kavanagh articulated a viewpoint prioritizing 'voting quality' over 'quantity,' suggesting a preference for fewer, more scrutinized votes, a sentiment critics linked to historical voter suppression efforts.
Ohio's Republican Secretary of State cancelled voter registrations in late 2023, deviating from the norm of alerting voter groups.
Answer: True
In late 2023, Ohio's Republican Secretary of State cancelled approximately 26,000 voter registrations shortly before an election, a move criticized for deviating from standard practices of notifying voter advocacy groups.
What issue arose with Florida's 1998 voter purges based on database matching?
Answer: It wrongly purged voters whose names were similar to convicted felons.
Florida's 1998 voter purges, using database matching, were criticized for erroneously removing eligible voters, particularly those with names similar to convicted felons, thereby impacting minority voters.
In Georgia's 2008 voter purges, what was a criticism regarding the state's methods?
Answer: Reliance on Social Security data led to wrongful removals, potentially violating federal laws.
A significant criticism of Georgia's 2008 voter purges was the state's reliance on Social Security data for verification, which resulted in the wrongful removal of registered voters and potential violations of federal law.
Which demographic was disproportionately impacted by voter purges in Brooklyn between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: Majority-Hispanic districts.
Analysis of voter purges in Brooklyn between 2015 and 2016 indicated a disproportionate impact on majority-Hispanic districts.
What did a federal appeals court rule regarding North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law?
Answer: The law targeted African Americans with 'almost surgical precision.'
A federal appeals court ruled that North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law was enacted with discriminatory intent, targeting African Americans with 'almost surgical precision.'
The 1838 Gallatin County Election Day Battle is cited as an early instance of voter suppression based on what affiliation?
Answer: Religious or group affiliation.
The 1838 Gallatin County Election Day Battle is recognized as an early example of voter suppression targeting individuals based on their religious or group affiliation, specifically Mormons.
What did conservative leader Paul Weyrich suggest about the relationship between voter numbers and electoral leverage?
Answer: Fewer voters increase electoral leverage.
Conservative leader Paul Weyrich posited that electoral leverage is enhanced by a reduction in the voting populace, suggesting a strategic advantage in lower voter turnout.
What tactic did the RNC employ in the 1980s that led to a consent decree?
Answer: Challenging voter registrations based on returned mail ('caging').
In the 1980s, the RNC engaged in challenging voter registrations based on returned mail ('caging'), a practice that resulted in a consent decree prohibiting such activities targeting minority communities.
What was the goal of the phone jamming tactic used in the 2002 New Hampshire Senate election?
Answer: To tie up Democratic Party phone lines, hindering voter transportation.
The phone jamming tactic in the 2002 New Hampshire Senate election aimed to disrupt the Democratic Party's communication lines, thereby impeding their efforts to arrange voter transportation.
What allegations were made against Voters Outreach of America during the 2004 presidential election?
Answer: They collected Republican registration forms but discarded Democratic ones.
Voters Outreach of America faced allegations during the 2004 election of collecting Republican registration forms while discarding Democratic ones, potentially preventing voters from being registered.
What controversial statement was attributed to Michigan Republican John Pappageorge regarding the 2004 election?
Answer: 'If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we're going to have a tough time.'
Michigan Republican John Pappageorge reportedly stated, 'If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we're going to have a tough time,' indicating a strategy to reduce voter turnout in a specific area.
What voter suppression tactics were identified in Ohio during the 2004 presidential election?
Answer: Creating long queues in wards leaning towards John Kerry.
In Ohio's 2004 election, tactics included creating long queues in wards favoring John Kerry by limiting voting machines and excessively challenging voters, actions deemed illegal by a federal court.
What happened to Kerry campaign workers in Wisconsin related to the 2004 election?
Answer: They were convicted for slashing tires of vans meant for Republican voters.
Four Kerry campaign workers were convicted for slashing the tires of vans intended for transporting Republican voters and monitors in Wisconsin during the 2004 election.
Which of the following voter suppression incidents occurred during the 2006 Virginia Senate election?
Answer: All of the above.
During the 2006 Virginia Senate election, documented suppression tactics included fliers urging voters to skip the election, false calls about polling hours, and robocalls falsely stating voting would lead to arrest.
What was the alleged 'caging scheme' the Obama campaign sought to stop in Michigan in 2008?
Answer: Using foreclosure lists to challenge voters at the polls.
The alleged 'caging scheme' the Obama campaign sought to stop in Michigan in 2008 involved using foreclosure lists to challenge voters based on their residency status at the polls.
What legal challenge did the ACLU of Michigan pursue regarding voter rolls in 2008?
Answer: Challenging a law that nullified registrations if voter ID cards were returned as undeliverable.
The ACLU of Michigan challenged a state law that automatically nullified voter registrations if voter ID cards were returned as undeliverable, arguing it wrongly purged voters.
What occurred during the 2008 Election Day incident in Philadelphia involving the New Black Panther Party?
Answer: They stood in uniform near a polling place, with one carrying a billy club and allegedly shouting slurs.
During the 2008 Election Day incident in Philadelphia, members of the New Black Panther Party were present near a polling place in uniform, with one carrying a billy club and reportedly using slurs, leading to accusations of intimidation.
How did the Bob Ehrlich campaign allegedly attempt voter suppression in the 2010 Maryland gubernatorial election?
Answer: By using robocalls falsely stating polls had closed early.
The Bob Ehrlich campaign allegedly used robocalls to falsely inform voters that polls had closed early, a tactic aimed at suppressing turnout in the 2010 Maryland gubernatorial election.
What was the outcome for Paul Schurick, Ehrlich's campaign manager, regarding the 2010 robocalls?
Answer: He was convicted and received penalties including home detention.
Paul Schurick, Ehrlich's campaign manager, was convicted for his role in the 2010 robocalls and received penalties including home detention.
What accusation did Democrats make against Montgomery County Republicans regarding early-voting sites in 2015?
Answer: They were moving sites from densely populated areas to sparsely populated, more Republican-friendly ones.
Democrats accused Montgomery County Republicans in 2015 of voter suppression by proposing to move early-voting sites from densely populated areas to less populated, more Republican-leaning locations.
Kris Kobach's Documentary Proof of Citizenship law in Kansas was found to illegally refuse applications from how many U.S. citizens?
Answer: Over 31,000
A federal judge ruled that Kris Kobach's Documentary Proof of Citizenship law in Kansas illegally rejected over 31,000 applications from U.S. citizens.
What did a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling state about North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law's intent?
Answer: It was enacted with clear 'discriminatory intent' against African Americans.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that North Carolina's 2016 voter ID law was enacted with clear 'discriminatory intent' targeting African Americans.
What issue did Native American voters face with North Dakota's voter ID law?
Answer: The law required a residential address on IDs, which many lacked.
North Dakota's voter ID law, requiring a residential address, posed a significant barrier for Native American voters, many of whom did not possess IDs with this specific information.
What did a federal judge find regarding Wisconsin's voter ID law?
Answer: It led to 'real incidents of disenfranchisement,' particularly in minority communities.
A federal judge determined that Wisconsin's voter ID law resulted in 'real incidents of disenfranchisement,' especially impacting minority communities, and undermined confidence in elections.
What was the stated purpose of President Trump's Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity?
Answer: To prevent voter fraud.
President Trump's Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity was ostensibly established to investigate alleged voter fraud, though critics suggested its true aim was voter suppression.
What issue was raised regarding the Crosscheck system used by the Election Integrity Commission?
Answer: It had a flawed algorithm returning many false positives.
The Crosscheck system, utilized by the Election Integrity Commission, was criticized for its flawed algorithm, which generated a high number of false positives, potentially leading to the wrongful removal of eligible voters.
How did Alabama's actions following the Shelby County v. Holder decision raise voter suppression concerns?
Answer: By implementing a strict photo ID law and closing DMV offices more frequently in counties with high Black populations.
Alabama's post-Shelby County v. Holder actions, including a strict photo ID law and the closure of DMV offices in predominantly Black counties, raised significant concerns about voter suppression.
What voter suppression allegations were made against Georgia's Secretary of State Brian Kemp in 2018 concerning voter registration?
Answer: His office used an 'exact match' policy that disproportionately flagged minority voters.
Georgia's Secretary of State Brian Kemp faced allegations of voter suppression in 2018 due to his office's 'exact match' policy, which disproportionately flagged minority voters' registration applications.
What happened in Louisville, Georgia, in October 2018, concerning a voter bus tour?
Answer: A county clerk claimed the bus tour constituted 'political activity,' preventing boarding.
In Louisville, Georgia, Black senior citizens were prevented from boarding an early voting bus tour when a county clerk invoked rules against 'political activity,' leading to claims of voter suppression.
What legal challenge did the Indiana NAACP and League of Women Voters file in 2017?
Answer: To stop a law allowing voter purges without notification.
In 2017, the Indiana NAACP and League of Women Voters filed a lawsuit to challenge a state law permitting voter purges without prior notification to the affected individuals.
What was the context of Wisconsin's 2019 voter purges ordered by a judge?
Answer: They were based on a report from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) and pushed by a conservative group.
Wisconsin's 2019 voter purges were ordered by a judge following a report from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) and were advocated for by the conservative group Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL).
How did Texas limit absentee voting in 2020?
Answer: By limiting absentee ballot drop-off locations to one per county.
In 2020, Texas limited absentee voting by restricting drop-off locations to one per county, a measure that faced legal challenges and was later blocked by courts.
What did Arizona Representative John Kavanagh suggest regarding voting 'quality'?
Answer: Voting quality is more important than quantity.
Arizona Representative John Kavanagh expressed the view that 'voting quality' should be prioritized over 'quantity,' a statement critics associated with historical voter suppression tactics.
What actions by Ohio's Republican Secretary of State drew criticism in late 2023?
Answer: Cancelling approximately 26,000 voter registrations shortly before an election.
Ohio's Republican Secretary of State faced criticism in late 2023 for cancelling roughly 26,000 voter registrations shortly before an election, deviating from standard notification practices.
Since the Shelby County v. Holder decision, there has been a decrease in legislative efforts to restrict voting access.
Answer: False
Following the Shelby County v. Holder ruling in 2013, there has been a notable increase in legislative efforts to restrict voting access across numerous states, rather than a decrease.
Literacy tests were officially prohibited as a voting eligibility requirement in 1970 through an amendment to the Voting Rights Act.
Answer: True
An amendment to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 officially prohibited the use of literacy tests as a voting eligibility requirement in 1970, removing a significant barrier to suffrage.
The 2016 presidential election was the first in 50 years held without the full protections of the original Voting Rights Act.
Answer: True
The 2016 presidential election marked the first time in five decades that the election was conducted without the full protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, following the Shelby County v. Holder decision.
The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread efforts to expand mail-in voting without any subsequent challenges.
Answer: False
While the COVID-19 pandemic prompted expansions of mail-in voting, these efforts were met with numerous challenges and restrictions from various groups and political actors.
Following the 2020 election, Republican lawmakers nationwide proposed new laws to restrict voting access, often citing false claims of fraud.
Answer: True
In the aftermath of the 2020 election, Republican lawmakers across the country introduced legislation aimed at restricting voting access, frequently citing unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud.
Automatic voter registration laws enacted since 2015 aim to increase voter turnout by simplifying the registration process.
Answer: True
Automatic voter registration laws, implemented in various states since 2015, are designed to enhance voter turnout by streamlining the registration process, often linking it to interactions with government agencies like the DMV.
The John Lewis Voting Rights Act seeks to restore provisions of the 1965 Voting Rights Act weakened by the Shelby County v. Holder decision.
Answer: True
The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act aims to reinstate key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that were diminished by the Supreme Court's ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, thereby strengthening federal oversight of voting laws.
According to the Brennan Center for Justice, what trend was observed in voting restriction bills after the Shelby County v. Holder decision?
Answer: A notable increase, with over 361 bills introduced across 47 states.
The Brennan Center for Justice reported a substantial rise in legislative efforts to restrict voting access following the Shelby County v. Holder decision, with over 361 such bills introduced in 47 states.
When were literacy tests officially prohibited as a voting eligibility requirement?
Answer: 1970, via an amendment to the Voting Rights Act.
Literacy tests were officially banned as a voting eligibility requirement in 1970 through an amendment to the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
What was significant about the 2016 presidential election concerning voting rights protections?
Answer: It was held without the full protections of the original Voting Rights Act.
The 2016 presidential election was notable for being the first in 50 years conducted without the complete protections afforded by the original Voting Rights Act, following the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder.
What is the stated objective of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act?
Answer: To restore provisions of the 1965 Voting Rights Act weakened by Shelby County v. Holder.
The John Lewis Voting Rights Act aims to reinstate key provisions of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that were weakened by the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder, thereby reinforcing federal protections for voting rights.